Impact of Training on Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems on Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Novices: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study

The value of stereoscopic three-dimensional vision on dental students' performance in a virtual reality simulator

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to quantitatively investigate the impact of stereoscopic three-dimensional (3D) vision on students' performance when compared with that of two-dimensional (2D) vision in a 3D virtual reality (VR) simulator.

METHODS

Twenty-four dental students (second- and fourth-year BDS) were assigned to perform three operative tasks under 3D and 2D viewing conditions on a Virteasy (HRV) simulator. Groups were crossed over and all students performed the same tasks under the alternate viewing conditions. The performance was evaluated by (1) accuracy, (2) outside target area removal, and (3) tooth cutting time, automatically using the generated feedback.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants completed all sessions. The results revealed a statistically significant effect of 3D vision over 2D vision on students' performance in terms of accuracy (p = 0.035). Stereoscopic 3D vision showed significant effect on outside target area removal in the first task (p = 0.035). Tooth cutting time was the same under both conditions (p = 0.766). The findings revealed improvement in accuracy score and reduction in outside target area removal over the course of the experiment under both conditions. Comparing the difference in 3D effect in the early and advanced learning groups revealed no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Utilizing stereoscopic 3D vision in the training session improved students' perception of depth which led to more accurate tooth cutting within the target area, and less outside target area removal. However, 3D shows a limited impact on task completion time.

Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic surgery underwent great improvements during the last few years. This review aims to compare the performance of Trainee Surgeons using 2D versus 3D/4 K laparoscopy. A systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's Library and Scopus. The following words and key phrases have been searched: "Two-dimensional vision", "Three-dimensional vision", "2D and 3D laparoscopy", "Trainee surgeons". This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement 2020. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022328045. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two observational studies were included in the systematic review. Two trials were carried out in a clinical setting, and twenty-two trials were performed in a simulated setting. In studies involving the use of a box trainer, the number of errors in the 2D laparoscopic group was significantly higher than in the 3D laparoscopic group during the performance of FLS skill tasks: peg transfer (MD: -0.82; 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.47; p < 0.00001), cutting (MD: - 1.09; 95% CI - 1.50 to - 0.69 p < 0.00001), suturing (MD: - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.83 to - 0.13 p = 0.007), However, in clinical studies, there was no significant difference in the time taken for laparoscopic total hysterectomy (MD: 8.71; 95% CI - 13.55 to 30.98; p = 0.44) and vaginal cuff closure (MD: 2.00; 95% CI - 0.72 to - 4.72; p = 0.15) between 2D group and 3D group. 3D laparoscopy facilitates learning for novice surgeons and shows improvements in their laparoscopic performance.

A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices

BACKGROUND

Stereoscopic (3D) imaging can be used to facilitate the learning of basic laparoscopic tasks. Its advantages over traditional endoscopic (2D) imaging include better depth perception and spatial orientation. However, the transition between 3D and 2D imaging systems has not been previously studied. This study compares the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills in a laparoscopic-naïve population using both imaging systems, and explores the possibility of a secondary learning curve in the transition between systems.

METHODS

26 novice learners were randomly allocated into two arms and taught to perform two basic laparoscopic tasks adopted from the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) curriculum, peg transfer (T1) and pattern cutting (T2) using either 2D or 3D imaging systems. These tasks were repeated until proficiency was achieved. Participants in each arm then repeated the tasks in the other viewing system (2D/3D vs 3D/2D). The parameters measured were: (a) time taken to complete the task and (b) number of attempts to achieve proficiency.

RESULTS

There was a significant shortening of time required to achieve proficiency in T2 using a 3D system (mean difference-in-differences =  - 65.4, 95% CI - 103.6 to - 27.2, t(24) =  - 3.5, p value = 0.002) but no difference between 2D and 3D imaging systems for T1, a simpler task. Sub-group analysis of T1 and T2 between the 2D/3D and 3D/2D arms showed the presence of a secondary learning curve in the 2D/3D arm for both tasks, (T1: β-estimate - 2.68, 95% CI - 3.68 to - 1.68, p value = 0.0003; T2: β-estimate - 2.45, 95% CI - 3.75 to - 1.14, p value 0.004), but in the 3D/2D arm there was a secondary learning curve only for T2. (β-estimate 2.60, 95% CI 1.45-3.76, p value 0.001) CONCLUSION: 3D imaging can be an effective tool to speed the acquisition of proficiency in basic laparoscopic tasks for novice learners, especially in more complex tasks such as pattern cutting. The skills learned in 3D imaging can translate into 2D, albeit with a secondary learning curve.

The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018

BACKGROUND

The use of 3D laparoscopic systems is expanding. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community.

METHODS

Systematic reviews of the PubMed and Embase libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of 3D on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by an international surgical and engineering expert panel which were presented and voted at the EAES annual congress, London, May 2018.

RESULTS

9967 abstracts were screened with 138 articles included. 18 statements and two recommendations were generated and approved. 3D significantly shortened operative time (mean difference 11 min (8% [95% CI 20.29-1.72], I² 96%)). A significant reduction in complications was observed when 3D systems were used (RR 0.75, [95 CI% 0.60-0.94], I² 0%) particularly for cases involving laparoscopic suturing (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35-0.90], I² 0%). In 69 box trainer or simulator studies, 64% concluded trainees were significant faster and 62% performed fewer errors when using 3D.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of 3D vision in laparoscopy to reduce the operative time (grade of recommendation: low). Future robust clinical research is required to specifically investigate the potential benefit of 3D laparoscopy system on complication rates (grade of recommendation: high).

The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018

BACKGROUND

The use of 3D laparoscopic systems is expanding. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community.

METHODS

Systematic reviews of the PubMed and Embase libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of 3D on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by an international surgical and engineering expert panel which were presented and voted at the EAES annual congress, London, May 2018.

RESULTS

9967 abstracts were screened with 138 articles included. 18 statements and two recommendations were generated and approved. 3D significantly shortened operative time (mean difference 11 min (8% [95% CI 20.29-1.72], I² 96%)). A significant reduction in complications was observed when 3D systems were used (RR 0.75, [95 CI% 0.60-0.94], I² 0%) particularly for cases involving laparoscopic suturing (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35-0.90], I² 0%). In 69 box trainer or simulator studies, 64% concluded trainees were significant faster and 62% performed fewer errors when using 3D.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of 3D vision in laparoscopy to reduce the operative time (grade of recommendation: low). Future robust clinical research is required to specifically investigate the potential benefit of 3D laparoscopy system on complication rates (grade of recommendation: high).

A Suggestion on How to Compare 2D and 3D Laparoscopy: A Qualitative Analysis of the Literature and Randomized Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The results of studies comparing two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy have shown variable results. We aimed to review the literature and develop an appropriate instrument to compare 2D and 3D laparoscopy. We further aimed to use the data extracted to perform a pilot study.

METHODS

Sixty-seven recent articles on 3D laparoscopy were reviewed and data extracted on factors influencing outcome variables. These variables were used to design a pilot study of 28 novices using a randomized crossover design. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

Seven themes were identified to influence the outcome of 3D studies: applied technique (1), experience of subjects (2), study design (3), learning curve (4), subjective qualitative reports (5), laparoscopic tasks (6), and chosen outcome variables (7). The consecutively developed five laparoscopic simulation tasks contained placing a rubber band over hooks, ring and pearl transfer, threading a pipe cleaner through loops, and placing a suturise. The pilot study showed a primary benefit of 3D laparoscopy that was unrelated to repetition. Two tasks served well to assess first-time performance, and two tasks promise to serve well to assess a learning curve if performed repeatedly.

CONCLUSION

We were able to identify important issues influencing the outcome of studies analyzing 3D laparoscopy. These may help evaluate future studies. The developed tasks resulted in meaningful data in favor of 3D visualization, but further studies are necessary to confirm the pilot test results.

Trauma laparoscopy: A prospect of skills training (cohort study)

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic laparoscopy is well-accepted in management of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) with the rate of missed injuries below 1%. However, there is a reluctance to accept therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma society. The possible reason is a lack of laparoscopic skills by trauma surgeons. Moreover, no formal laparoscopy training program for trauma exists. The aim of this study was to interrogated our laparoscopy training particularly in trauma setting, and to investigate a possible relation between the seniority of surgeons performing the procedures and the complication rates.

METHODS

All patients managed laparoscopically for PAT from January 2012 to December 2015 were analyzed. The seniority of operating surgeon was correlated with adverse outcomes, and with conversion. Surgeon-consultant (SC), assistant-consultant (AC), surgeon-senior-resident (SSR) and surgeon-junior-resident (SJC) groups were identified. Laparoscopic maneuvers used in this cohort were investigated and the set of essential laparoscopic skills was identified. The laparoscopic training program at our institution was described and discussed.

RESULTS

Out of 283 patients with PAT approached with laparoscopy 33 (11.7%) were converted to laparotomy. Majority (49.6%) of laparoscopy was performed by senior resident. Consultant was an operating surgeon in 21.2% and an assistant in 8% of cases. Consultant was involved in cases with higher severity of injury and the complication rate was higher in the SC and AC groups. Essential laparoscopic skills were camera navigation, mobilization of intraabdominal organs, bowel run and intracorporeal suturing. During training, a senior resident was involved in 19% of operations for trauma. Trauma constituted 16% of all laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy for trauma can be safely performed by residents under appropriate supervision. Laparoscopic skills should preferably be obtained during elective non-trauma procedures and transferred to trauma setting. Multimodal goal-directed, proctored training with regular assessments and feedback is effective and skills are transferable to trauma setting.