Integrative Medicine for Postoperative Patients: A Survey of Korean Medicine Doctors

Analysis of factors associated with the use of Korean medicine after spinal surgery using a nationwide database in Korea

Many patients in Korea use Korean Medicine (KM) after spine surgery, but related research is lacking. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze factors affecting the use and costs of KM using nationally representative data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, South Korea. Patients who underwent spinal surgery for spinal diseases from 2011 to 2014 were followed up for 5 years, and their medical care was described. The association between patient and spinal surgery characteristics and the use of KM was analyzed. A two-part model was used to analyze factors affecting the use of KM in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Of 11,802 patients who underwent spinal surgery, 11,367 who met the inclusion criteria were included. Overall, 55.5% were female, 32.3% were aged ≥ 70 years, and 50.2% received KM treatment during the follow-up period. Open discectomy was the most common surgical procedure performed (58.6%), and 40.2% of surgeries were performed because of lumbar disc disorder. Female sex, older age, high Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and use of KM before surgery were associated with increased KM use and expenditure after surgery. In conclusion, patient characteristics, rather than surgical characteristics, appeared to be more strongly associated with the use of KM after surgery, particularly prior experience with KM use. This study is significant in that it analyzed the entire spine surgery to provide a comprehensive view of the use of KM after spine surgery and analyzed the impact of various factors related patients and surgical characteristics on KM use. The results of this study may be useful to patients with spinal diseases, clinicians, and policymakers.

Development of Key Performance Indicators for Capturing Impact of Pharmaceutical Care in Palestinian Integrative Healthcare Facilities: A Delphi Consensus Study

Background

The current study was performed to develop a consensus-based core inventory of key performance indicators (KPIs) to be used in capturing the impact of pharmaceutical care in healthcare facilities that employ integrative medicine paradigm in Palestine.

Methods

A panel of healthcare professionals and risk/quality assurance managers was composed employing a judgmental sampling technique. The study tool was a questionnaire. Views and opinions of the panelists on the roles of pharmacists in caring for patients admitted to or visiting healthcare facilities that employ integrative medicine were collected using 11 statements. An initial inventory of activities and services that potentially can be used as KPIs was compiled from the literature and interviews with key contact experts in the domain. Three iterative Delphi rounds were conducted among the panelists (n = 50) to achieve formal consensus on the KPIs that should be used. The consensus-based KPIs were ordered by the scores of the panelists.

Results

A total of 8 consensus-based KPIs were developed. The KPIs related to the number of problems related to medications and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) that were resolved by pharmacists and CAM practitioners (p < 0.0001), number of patients for whom reconciliations were documented (p < 0.0001), number of patients receiving direct, comprehensive, and/or collaborative care (p < 0.0001), and number of patients for whom pharmacists and CAM practitioners were involved in implementing a therapeutic plan (p < 0.05) were rated significantly higher than the KPI (#8) related to the participation in multi-healthcare provider discussions/deliberations.

Conclusions

Consensus-based KPIs that can be used in capturing the impact of evidence-based CAM and pharmaceutical care of patients in healthcare facilities that employ integrative medicine paradigm were developed. Future studies are still needed to investigate if implementing these KPIs might promote evidence-based CAM and pharmaceutical care in healthcare facilities that employ the integrative medicine paradigm.

The Affirmation – Tapping on Pain Perception and Serotonin Serum Level of Post – Caesarian Section patients

Introduction: Affirmation - tapping interventions have been shown to reduce pain complaints in post-operative patients completing conventional treatment. This is thought to be due to serotonin performance but clinical studies have not been conducted. The aim was to compare the mean perception of the pain reported by post-operative patients given affirmation- tapping treatment with another treatment as a complementary nursing intervention. This was to see if the performance of the serotonin serum level is different from in other treatments.Methods: We used a randomized post-test only control group design carried out in parallel in post-caesarean section patients. The sample totaled 40 patients divided into four groups (10 in affirmation, 10 in tapping, 10 in affirmation-tapping and 10 in the control). They were obtained through simple random sampling. The instruments included affirmation-tapping guidelines, Elisa kits and the McGill - Melzack Pain Questionnaire short-form (MPQsf). The independent variable was the intervention of affirmation-tapping and the dependent variables were pain perception and serotonin level. The data was analyzed using simple linear regression.Results: The average variant of the serotonin levels in the affirmation-tapping treatment group was higher and thus differed significantly from the other groups.Conclusion: Affirmation-tapping as a complementary nursing intervention can increase the serotonin serum levels of the post-caesarean section patients by complementing conventional treatments. Participant pain complaints were lowest in the affirmation-tapping group with the highest serotonin levels present and these were significantly different to the other groups. Affirmation – tapping was recommended as a complementary intervention in nursing post-operative patients that complements conventional treatment.