Value of Transvaginal Two-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Atypical Ovarian Corpus Luteum Hematoma

Diagnostic Value of Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Ovarian Cancer

Objective

Explore the value of two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer, so as to provide the basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Methods

A total of 100 suspected ovarian cancer patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the research subjects, including 62 ovarian cancer patients (ovarian cancer group) and 38 ovarian benign tumor patients (benign group). Two-dimensional vaginal ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were performed in both groups. The differences in PI, RI, EDV, PSV, and VM parameters of the two groups as well as those of patients with ovarian cancer of different grades were compared. Record the contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters such as AT, TTP and IMAX, and determine the diagnostic value.

Results

The PI and RI of the ovarian cancer group were lower than those of the benign ovarian tumor group, and the EDV, PSV and VM of the ovarian cancer group were higher than those of the benign ovarian tumor group (p < 0.05). The PI and RI of the patients in stage I–II of the ovarian cancer group were higher than those in stage III–IV, and the EDV, PSV and VM were lower than those in the patients in stage III–IV, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed that the AT and TTP values in the ovarian cancer group were significantly shorter than those in the benign group, and the peak intensity was significantly higher than that in the benign group, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of two-dimensional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer were high, 95.16%(59/62), 86.84%(33/38), 92.19%(59/64), 91.67%(33/36) and 92.00%(92/100), respectively.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to some extent makes up for the deficiencies of conventional ultrasound, is helpful to detect early ovarian cancer, and can be used for the differential diagnosis of small ovarian tumors with difficult two-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis. Two-dimensional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound can effectively improve the detection rate and differential diagnosis value of ovarian cancer, which is of great significance in the early diagnosis and differentiation of ovarian cancer.

Ultrasound screening of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer has a high mortality rate. The most common serous type spreads rapidly throughout the peritoneal cavity when 5-year survival is 10%. If diagnosed in earlier stages where the cancer is still confined to the ovary, this survival rate is about 90%. This is the reason to be interested in screening at earlier stages in the average-risk general population. Thus, annual transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) alone or as a multimodal screening test following serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) has been investigated. Ultrasound lacks sensitivity and specificity; new contrast-enhanced approaches might improve these. When the serum marker is combined with ultrasound and interpreted by a rise in the level rather than by a fixed cut-off, improved sensitivity and specificity and a late but not significant reduction in mortality are observed. Further investigations could highlight the interest of a shorter than annual screening, of a long-term follow-up and new contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques.