Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices

Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) encompasses a wide array of invasive devices, which provide short-term hemodynamic support for multiple clinical indications. Although initially developed for the management of cardiogenic shock, indications for MCS have expanded to include prophylactic insertion prior to high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment of acute circulatory failure following cardiac surgery, and bridging of end-stage heart failure patients to more definitive therapies, such as left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplantation. A wide variety of devices are available to provide left ventricular, right ventricular, or biventricular support. The choice of a temporary MCS device requires consideration of the clinical scenario, patient characteristics, institution protocols, and provider familiarity and training. In this review, the most common forms of left, right, and biventricular temporary MCS are discussed, along with their indications, contraindications, complications, cannulations, hemodynamic effects, and available clinical data.

Cardiogenic Shock and the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Assist Devices

Percutaneous mechanical assist devices are used in patients with cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this article is to familiarize critical care nurses with the various types of percutaneous mechanical assist devices, including the intra-aortic balloon pump, the Impella device, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and the TandemHeart device. Each type of device requires specific nursing care. In a patient with cardiogenic shock, the monitoring, care, and interventions provided by an experienced critical care nurse can make the difference between survival and death.

Role of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in the development of bleeding complications in patients treated with Impella RP devices

Axial flow pumps are standard treatment in cases of cardiogenic shock and high-risk interventions in cardiology and cardiac surgery, although the optimal anticoagulation strategy remains unclear. We evaluated whether laboratory findings could predict bleeding complications and acquired von Willebrand syndrome (avWS) among patients who were treated using axial flow pumps. We retrospectively evaluated 60 consecutive patients who received Impella devices (Impella RP: n = 20, Impella CP/5.0: n = 40; Abiomed Inc., Danvers, USA) between January 2019 and December 2020. Thirty-two patients (53.3%) experienced major or fatal bleeding complications (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium score of > 3) despite intravenous heparin being used to maintain normal activated partial thromboplastin times (40–50 s). Extensive testing was performed for 28 patients with bleeding complications (87.5%). Relative to patients with left ventricular support, patients with right ventricular support were less likely to develop avWS (87.5% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.035). Bleeding was significantly associated with avWS (odds ratio [OR]: 20.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3–128.5; p = 0.001) and treatment duration (OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.09–1.55; p = 0.003). Patients with avWS had longer Impella treatment than patients without avWS (2 days [1–4.7 days] vs. 7.3 days [3.2–13.0 days]). Bleeding complications during Impella support were associated with avWS in our cohort, while aPTT monitoring was not sufficient to prevent bleeding complications. A more targeted anticoagulation monitoring might be needed for patients who receive Impella devices.

Biventricular Impella (Bi-Pella) in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: The First Case from the Middle East

Cardiogenic shock (CS) associated with biventricular failure (BiVF) carries significant in-hospital morbidity and mortality. We describe here the successful use of percutaneous biventricular Impella (Bi-Pella) for cardiogenic shock secondary to acute biventricular myocardial infarctions (AMI-CS), as guided by parameters such as mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), central venous pressure (CVP), and cardiac power output (CPO). We aim to highlight the promising outcomes of timely implanted biventricular Impella in (AMI-CS).

Biventricular Impella use in pediatric patients with severe graft dysfunction from acute rejection after heart transplantation

Rejection with severe hemodynamic compromise is a significant source of morbidity and mortality for pediatric heart transplant patients. Traditionally, treatment for these patients includes inotropes and escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) when necessary. There is increasing interest in using percutaneous ventricular assistive devices in the pediatric population as a less invasive alternative to ECMO. We report the largest case series to date of biventricular support using percutaneous Impella devices. Retrospective case series was performed by chart review. Hemodynamics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and indices of end organ function were collected before and after Impella placement. A 14-year-old male, 18-year-old male, and 19-year-old female, all status post heart transplant, presented with severely decreased biventricular function due to presumed clinical rejection, requiring maximal inotropic support without improvement. In all the three cases, simultaneous Impella CP and RP devices were placed percutaneously. Prior to implantation, LVEFs were 40%, 23%, and 25%, respectively. Hemodynamics measured invasively prior to device placement showed elevated filling pressures. Adverse events while on support included bleeding, hemolysis, and right femoral arterial dissection during implantation. All patients were successfully weaned from the devices and survived to discharge. The average time of right-sided support and total support was 11 days and 13 days, respectively. After device removal, right-sided pressures and echocardiographic measurements showed improvement in all patients. Bilateral Impella configuration (BiPella) is a viable option for temporary mechanical circulatory support in pediatric patients with significant graft dysfunction.