Effect of Edaravone Combined with Anticoagulant Therapy on the Serum hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α Levels and Activity of Daily Living in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction

Diagnostic value and clinical significance of lncRNA LINC01123 combined with fibrinogen in acute cerebral infarction

OBJECTIVE

To explore the diagnostic value and clinical significance of lncRNA LINC01123 (LINC01123) binding fibrinogen in acute cerebral infarction (ACI) by evaluating the expression and potential molecular mechanism of LINC01123 in patients with acute cerebral infarction.

METHODS

The clinical data of all the volunteers were collected. The level of serum LINC01123 in ACI patients was detected by RT-qPCR. The relationship between LINC01123 and fibrinogen was studied via Pearson's correlation analysis. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of LINC01123 and fibrinogen for ACI. The risk factors of ACI were investigated by Binary Logistic regression analysis. And the targeting relationship between LINC01123 and downstream miR-361-3p was verified through luciferase activity assay.

RESULTS

Serum LINC01123 and fibrinogen levels were upregulated in ACI patients compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001), and there was a positive correlation between them (r = 0.6537, P < 0.001). In predicting the occurrence of ACI, LINC01123 and fibrinogen have high diagnostic value, and the AUC of combined diagnosis was 0.961, and the sensitivity and specificity (92.54%, 85.82%) were more significant. Meanwhile, LINC01123 and fibrinogen were confirmed to be independent risk factors for ACI (P < 0.0001). Mechanistically, miR-361-3p is the target of LINC01123. The expression of miR-361-3p was low in the serum of ACI patients, which was negatively correlated with the LINC01123 expression (r = -0.6885, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

LINC01123 combined with fibrinogen may have important reference value in the diagnosis of ACI as serum markers, which may become clinical indicators to predict the occurrence of ACI.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined with Arterial Thrombolysis (Bridging Therapy) Effectively Improves Vascular Recanalization Rate in Patients with Cerebral Infarction

Objective

To explore the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis combined with arterial thrombolysis (bridging therapy) in patients with acute cerebral infarction and its effect on serum inflammatory factors.

Methods

The case data of 138 patients with acute cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital from February 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment plan they received, patients were assigned to two groups, namely, an observation group (n = 71) treated with bridging therapy and a control group (n = 67) treated with intravenous thrombolysis alone. The following indexes were recorded and compared between the two groups: treatment efficacy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, activities of daily living, incidence rates of vascular recanalization, intracranial hemorrhage and reembolization after treatment, levels of inflammatory factors before and after treatment, levels of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and fibrinogen (FIB) before and 1 week after treatment, and modified Rankin Scale scores 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

Results

Compared with the control group, the therapeutic efficacy, neurological function, activities of daily living, and vascular recanalization were markedly better in the observation group (P > 0.05). In addition, the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and reembolization was statistically lower in the observation group (P < 0.05). No marked difference was found between the two groups in terms of pretreatment serum inflammatory factors and coagulation function (P > 0.05), while the above indicators improved statistically after treatment in both groups, with comparatively more obvious improvement in the observation group. It was also observed that, compared with the control group, the modified Rankin Scale score in the observation group was significantly better at 3 and 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Bridging therapy can improve the vascular recanalization rate among patients suffering from acute cerebral infarction, reduce the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and reembolization, and improve the prognosis and neurological function of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.