Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Vaginal microbial profile of cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: the potential involvement of Lactobacillus iners in recurrence

The vaginal microbiome is an immune defense against reproductive diseases and can serve as an important biomarker for cervical cancer. However, the intrinsic relationship between the recurrence and the vaginal microbiome in patients with cervical cancer before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy is poorly understood. Here, we analyzed 125 vaginal microbial profiles from a patient cohort of stage IB-IVB cervical cancer using 16S metagenomic sequencing and deciphered the microbial composition and functional characteristics of the recurrent and non-recurrent both before and after chemoradiotherapy. We demonstrated that the abundance of beneficial bacteria and stability of the microbial community in the vagina decreased in the recurrence group, implying the unique characteristics of the vaginal microbiome for recurrent cervical cancer. Moreover, using machine learning, we identified Lactobacillus iners as the most important biomarker, combined with age and other biomarkers (such as Ndongobacter massiliensis, Corynebacterium pyruviciproducens ATCC BAA-1742, and Prevotella buccalis), and could predict cancer recurrence phenotype before chemoradiotherapy. This study prospectively employed rigorous bioinformatics analysis and highlights the critical role of vaginal microbiota in post-treatment cervical cancer recurrence, identifying promising biomarkers with prognostic significance in the context of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. The role of L. iners in determining chemoradiation resistance in cervical cancer warrants further detailed investigation. Our results expand our understanding of cervical cancer recurrence and help develop better strategies for prognosis prediction and personalized therapy.

Efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Particle therapy, mainly including carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), has dose distribution advantages compared to photon radiotherapy. It has been widely reported as a promising treatment method for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its application in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is relatively rare, and its efficacy and safety are inconclusive. This study aimed to provide systematic evidence for evaluating the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable LA-NSCLC.

METHODS

To retrieve published literature, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library until September 4, 2022. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 2 and 5 years. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity. The pooled clinical outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using STATA 15.1.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible studies with a total sample size of 851 patients were included. The pooled data demonstrated that the OS, PFS, and LC rates at 2 years of LA-NSCLC treated by particle therapy were 61.3% (95% CI = 54.7-68.7%), 37.9% (95% CI = 33.8-42.6%) and 82.2% (95% CI = 78.7-85.9%), respectively. The pooled 5-year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 41.3% (95% CI = 27.1-63.1%), 25.3% (95% CI = 16.3-39.4%), and 61.5% (95% CI = 50.7-74.6%), respectively. Subgroup analysis stratified by treatment type showed that the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT, PBT combined with concurrent chemotherapy) group had better survival benefits than the PBT and CIRT groups. The incidence rates of grade 3/4 esophagitis, dermatitis, and pneumonia in LA-NSCLC patients after particle therapy were 2.6% (95% CI = 0.4-6.0%), 2.6% (95% CI = 0.5-5.7%) and 3.4% (95% CI = 1.4-6.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Particle therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in LA-NSCLC patients.

Incorporation of SKI-G-801, a Novel AXL Inhibitor, With Anti-PD-1 Plus Chemotherapy Improves Anti-Tumor Activity and Survival by Enhancing T Cell Immunity

A recently developed treatment strategy for lung cancer that combines immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy has been applied as a standard treatment for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and it has improved the outcomes of chemotherapy. Maintenance treatment with anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1) enhances the effect of immunochemical combination therapy and improves therapeutic efficacy, which contributes toward a significant improvement in patient survival rates. The AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL), which is expressed in tumor cells, plays an essential role in the resistance of cancers to chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and stimulates signaling associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metastatic cancer. AXL is thus an attractive target for controlling resistance to anti-tumor therapies. In this study, we examined the effect of AXL inhibitors on immune activation and tumor growth in TC1 and C3PQ mouse tumor models, in the context of clinical immunotherapy/chemotherapy and maintenance treatment, using an aPD-1 with/without pemetrexed. To determine the optimal timing for administration of SKI-G-801, an AXL inhibitor, we investigated its anti-tumor effects based on inclusion at the immunochemotherapy and maintenance therapy stages. We also performed flow cytometry-based immune profiling of myeloid cells and lymphoid cells at different points in the treatment schedule, to investigate the immune activation and anti-tumor effects of the AXL inhibitor. The addition of SKI-G-801 to the immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy stage, as well as the maintenance therapy stage, produced the best anti-tumor results, and significant tumor growth inhibition was observed in both the TC1 and C3PQ models. Both models also exhibited increased proportion of effector memory helper T cells and increased expression of CD86⁺ macrophages. Especially, regulatory T cells were significantly reduced in the TC1 tumor model and there was an increase in central memory cytotoxic T cell infiltration and an increased proportion of macrophages with high CD80 expression in the C3PQ tumor model. These results suggest increased infiltration of T cells, consistent with previous studies using AXL inhibitors. It is expected that the results from this study will serve as a stepping stone for clinical research to improve the existing standard of care.

Concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiotherapy yields significant results in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with thoracic radiotherapy alone. However, whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy is optimal remains unclear. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent vs sequential chemoradiotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for RCTs focusing on concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with NSCLC. The pooled-effect estimate was calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and publication biases were also evaluated. A total of 14 RCTs (2634 patients with NSCLC) were selected for the final meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not increase the 1-year survival rates; however, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates. Moreover, although there were no significant differences between concurrent and sequential chemoradiotherapy in terms of distant relapse and locoregional plus distant relapse, concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of locoregional relapse. Furthermore, concurrent chemoradiotherapy yielded positive results with respect to overall response rates. Unfortunately, concurrent chemoradiotherapy could result in esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, and reduced leukocyte and platelet counts in patients with NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be significantly beneficial in terms of long-term survival and locoregional relapse, although it increases the risk of grade 3 (or greater) adverse events.

X-ray-Induced Cherenkov Optical Triggering of Caged Doxorubicin Released to the Nucleus for Chemoradiation Activation

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used for advanced cancers, but the chemotherapy is dose limited by normal tissue toxicity. Localized X-ray activation of chemotherapy could overcome this, as studied here, with release from self-assembled nanomicelles (NMs) created from copolymers loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) having a photocleavable o-nitrobenzyl ester (o-Ne) group. The micelles demonstrated release of DOX from X-ray-induced Cherenkov light and conversion from a caged hydrophobic form to hydrophilic DOX, which achieves nuclear localization. Folate on the exterior of the NMs directed them for effective intracellular uptake prior to irradiation. Irradiation with 8 Gy released the DOX, which then entered the cell nucleus, providing near-complete in vivo tumor eradication and negligible off-target organ damage. Micelles were assembled from molecular component materials that are commonly in human use. This study realizes triple targeting in chemoradiation with potential for cell-receptor-mediated uptake, localized radiotherapy activation, and nuclear relocalization, all leading to limited off-target toxicity.

Telomerase peptide vaccination in NSCLC: a phase II trial in stage III patients vaccinated after chemoradiotherapy and an 8-year update on a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

We report two clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients evaluating immune response, toxicity, and clinical outcome after vaccination with the telomerase peptide GV1001: a phase II trial (CTN-2006) in patients vaccinated after chemoradiotherapy and an 8-year update on a previously reported phase I/II trial (CTN-2000).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CTN-2006: 23 inoperable stage III patients received radiotherapy (2 Gy × 30) and weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m(2)), followed by GV1001 vaccination. CTN-2000: 26 patients were vaccinated with two telomerase peptides (GV1001 and I540). The immune responses were evaluated by T-cell proliferation and cytokine assays.

RESULTS

CTN-2006 trial: a GV1001-specific immune response developed in 16/20 evaluable patients. Long-term immunomonitoring showed persisting responses in 13 subjects. Serious adverse events were not observed. Immune responders recorded a median PFS of 371 days, compared with 182 days for nonresponders (P = 0.20). CTN-2000 trial update: 13/24 evaluable subjects developed a GV1001 response. The immune responders achieved increased survival compared with nonresponders (median 19 months vs. 3.5 months; P < 0.001). Follow-up of four long-time survivors showed that they all harbored durable GV1001-specific T-cell memory responses and IFNγ(high)/IL-10(low)/IL-4(low) cytokine profiles. Two patients are free of disease after 108 and 93 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination with GV1001 is well tolerated, immunizes the majority of NSCLC patients and establishes durable T-cell memory. The considerable immune response rate and low toxicity in the phase II trial support the concept of combining chemoradiotherapy with vaccination. The survival advantage observed for immune responders warrants a randomized trial.

Chemo-radiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: concurrent or sequential? It's no longer the question: a systematic review

There has been conflicting evidence concerning the best sequence of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) for advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC). To investigate whether current clinical trials can clarify this schedule and offer further bases for clinical decision making, we performed a systematic review of 11 trials (2,043 patients; concurrent-1,019, sequential-1,024) that compared concurrent RT-CT with sequential arm in advanced NSCLC patients. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Pooled median ratios (MRs) and progression-free-survival ratios (FRs) for median survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the weighted sum of the log ratio of MR and FR of individual study. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective response rate, relapse control rate, and toxic events were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel estimate. Results confirmed that concurrent RT-CT determined a statistically significant increase in median survival time (16.3 vs. 13.9 months; MR = 1.17,95%CI:1.09-1.26), response rate (64.0% vs. 56.3%; OR = 1.38,95%CI:1.10-1.72), and tumor-relapse control (OR = 0.82,95%CI:0.69-0.97), though at the expense of increased hematological toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) and non-hematological toxicity (nausea/vomiting, stomatitis, and esophagitis). Similar results were obtained from the sensitivity analysis of all Phase-III/trials designed to evaluate the primary end point of OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that concurrent strategy was mainly associated with improved loco-regional control (OR = 0.68,95%CI:0.52-0.87). However, no difference in PFS is shown. While careful interpretation of our conclusions is required because of potential bias, the present study, to some extent, exhibits the superiority of the concurrent arm over the sequential in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Further improvements will be obtained by optimizing the conditions for a concurrent regimen.

High frequency of radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent radiotherapy and gemcitabine after induction with gemcitabine and carboplatin

INTRODUCTION

The combination of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most favorable chemotherapy regimen, timing of full-dose chemotherapy, and optimal combination of chemotherapy with radiation remain to be determined. Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine concurrent with radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin for locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven NSCLC stage IIIA and -B received carboplatin (area under the curve of 2.5) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for two cycles, followed by conventional fractioned thoracic radiotherapy and concomitant weekly gemcitabine 200 mg/m, and finally, consolidation chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Inclusion was discontinued because of high-grade 3 to 5 radiation-pneumonitis events (6 of 19 patients, 31.6%), including one treatment-related death associated with radiation pneumonitis. Median follow-up was 11.9 months. Most common grades 3/4 hematological side effects comprised anemia, neutropenia 3 of 19 patients, each (15.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4 of 19, 21.1%) during induction. Partial response was observed in 10 patients (52.6%) following induction chemotherapy. After concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, overall response was 68.4%. Four patients (21.1%) underwent surgical resection. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12 +/- 1 month (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-14.1) and 21 +/- 3.5 months (95% CI, 14-27.9 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent radiotherapy with gemcitabine after induction with gemcitabine and carboplatin showed a high-response rate; however, it is associated with excessive pulmonary toxicity. Adjustments in gemcitabine dosage during radiotherapy or changes in radiotherapy planning could reduce toxicity.

Telomerase-specific virotherapy for human squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Replication-selective tumor-specific viruses present a novel approach for treatment of neoplastic disease. They are designed to induce lysis after propagation within the tumor. Human telomerase is active in over 85% of primary cancers and its activity correlates closely with human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression.

OBJECTIVES

Oncolytic viruses, Telomelysin and TelomeScan, that combine the specificity of hTERT promoter-based expression systems with the lytic efficacy of replicative viruses were developed. The goal was to confirm the efficacy of the viruses for human squamous cell carcinoma.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is characterized by locoregional spread, and is clinically accessible, making it an attractive target for intratumoral virotherapy. The viruses replicated efficiently and induced killing in a panel of human cancer cell lines including SCCHN cells in vitro and in vivo. These results illustrate the potential of telomerase-specific oncolytic viruses for treatment of human SCCHN.

Telomerase-specific virotheranostics for human head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Long-term outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) remain unsatisfactory despite advances in combination of treatment modalities. SCCHN is characterized by locoregional spread and it is clinically accessible, making it an attractive target for intratumoral biological therapies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

OBP-301 is a type 5 adenovirus that contains the replication cassette in which the human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter drives expression of the E1 genes. OBP-401 contained the replication cassette and the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene. The antitumor effects of OBP-301 were evaluated in vitro by the sodium 30-[1-(phenylaminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis(4-methoxy-6-nitro)benzene sulfonic acid hydrate assay and in vivo in an orthotopic xenograft model. Virus spread into the lymphatics was also orthotopically assessed by using OBP-401.

RESULTS

Intratumoral injection of OBP-301 resulted in the shrinkage of human SCCHN tumors orthotopically implanted into the tongues of BALB/c nu/nu mice and significantly recovered weight loss by enabling oral ingestion. The levels of GFP expression following ex vivo infection of OBP-401 may be of value as a positive predictive marker for the outcome of telomerase-specific virotherapy. Moreover, whole-body fluorescent imaging revealed that intratumorally injected OBP-401 could visualize the metastatic lymph nodes, indicating the ability of the virus to traffic to the regional lymphatic area and to selectively replicate in neoplastic lesions, resulting in GFP expression and cell death in metastatic lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results illustrate the potential of telomerase-specific oncolytic viruses for a novel therapeutic and diagnostic approach, termed theranostics, for human SCCHN.

Combined chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: current status and future development

Currently, combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the standard treatment approach for locally advanced NSCLC patients. Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, although associated with increased acute toxicity, has demonstrated to be the better strategy over sequential chemoradiotherapy, and it is to be considered a standard approach in patients with good performance status (0-1). However, the approach to locally advanced NSCLC and to chemo-radiotherapy regimens remains heterogeneous among oncologists, and clinical outcomes are yet disappointing. Thus, the search of new strategies is mandatory. The main fields of research aiming at improving the survival of locally advanced NSCLC patients are: the addition of further combination chemotherapy as induction or consolidation to concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, and the integration of molecularly targeted therapies into conventional chemo-radiotherapy regimens.

FDG-PET Evaluation of Response to Treatment

This article discusses evaluating response after and during therapy in various settings and for the types of cancers for which ample evidence demonstrates that PET imaging with flourodeoxyglucose provides a valuable surrogate for response to therapy. It also briefly discusses pitfalls in obtaining an optimal assessment of response and issues that need further attention for this modality to become established as an independent predictor of response to anticancer therapy.

Phase I trial of sirolimus combined with radiation and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The safety and tolerability of sirolimus combined with thoracic radiation and cisplatin was evaluated in patients with lung cancer. In parallel, the effects of sirolimus were studied in a murine model of radiation pneumonitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The phase I trial evaluated standard three-dimensional conformal thoracic radiation therapy (60 Gy) and weekly cisplatin (25 mg/m2 i.v.) in combination with escalating doses of oral sirolimus. Sirolimus drug levels and inhibition of mTOR signaling to ribosomal S6 protein were assessed in blood. The effects of sirolimus administered during and after whole thoracic radiation of C57BL6/J mice were evaluated by monitoring mouse breathing rates and survival.

RESULTS

Seven patients with stage III lung cancer were accrued to the clinical study. None of the four patients treated with 2 mg/day sirolimus developed dose-limiting toxicities. Three patients were treated with 5 mg/day sirolimus, and one patient at this dose level had dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 dysphagia. However, the maximally tolerated dose of sirolimus in this regimen was not defined because the study was terminated prematurely because of loss of funding. In the mouse experiments, concomitant sirolimus treatment was not associated with an increase in radiation-associated morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with sirolimus, radiation, and cisplatin was well tolerated in patients.

Effect of Amifostine on Response Rates in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated on Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Amifostine can reduce the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, but concerns remain regarding its possible tumor-protective effects. Studies with sufficient statistical power to address this question are lacking.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a meta-analysis of all published clinical trials involving locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, who had been randomized to treatment with amifostine vs. no amifostine or placebo. Random effects estimates of the relative risk of overall, partial, and complete response were obtained.

RESULTS

Seven randomized trials involving 601 patients were identified. Response rate data were available for six studies (552 patients). The pooled relative risk (RR) estimate was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.18; p = 0.18), 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.78; p = 0.33), and 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.26; p = 0.95) for overall, complete, and partial response, respectively (a RR >1 indicates improvement in response with amifostine compared with the control arm). The results were similar after sensitivity analyses. No evidence was found of treatment effect heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Amifostine has no effect on tumor response in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Phase I study of cisplatin analogue nedaplatin, paclitaxel, and thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients in good general condition, but where the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has not been determined.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer received nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) and paclitaxel on day 1 every 4 weeks for 3-4 cycles and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions for 6 weeks) starting on day 1. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated from 120 mg/m2 in level 1, 135 mg/m2 in level 2 to 150 mg/m2 in level 3.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (14 males and 4 females, with a median age of 62.5 years) were evaluated in this study. Full cycles of chemotherapy were administered in 83% of patients in level 1, and in 50% of patients in levels 2 and 3. No more than 50% of patients developed grade 4 neutropenia. Transient grade 3 esophagitis and infection were noted in one patient, and unacceptable pneumonitis was noted in three (17%) patients, two of whom died of the toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), evaluated in 15 patients, noted in one of the six patients in level 1, three of the six patients in level 2 and one of the three patients in level 3. One DLT at level 2 developed later as radiation pneumonitis. Thus, the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be level 1. The overall response rate (95% confidence interval) was 67% (41-87%) with 12 partial responses.

CONCLUSION

The doses of paclitaxel and nedaplatin could not be escalated as a result of severe pulmonary toxicity.

Exploitable mechanisms for combining drugs with radiation: concepts, achievements and future directions

Widening indications for combining radiation therapy with cytotoxic or molecular-targeted drugs have mainly been driven by pragmatic clinical trials. With a flurry of novel drugs in various stages of preclinical and clinical development there is a need to revise the framework that has traditionally been used for discussing possible drug-radiation interactions, especially because many of the new drugs are directed at a specific molecular target. Spatial cooperation, cytotoxic enhancement, biological cooperation, temporal modulation and normal tissue protection are proposed as five primary exploitable mechanisms for the rational combination of drugs with radiation for cancer therapy. These five mechanisms produce different clinical outcomes and, therefore, the optimum clinical end point for assessing therapeutic benefit will depend on the mechanism tested. The dependence of outcome on these mechanisms also affects the selection of preclinical models and the optimum scheduling of the two modalities, i.e. the timing and dosing of the drug relative to the radiation dose fractions. These considerations are discussed in some detail for each mechanism and illustrated with specific clinical examples. Multi-modality therapy for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma is used to illustrate these concepts. Further clinical progress in this field will require hypothesis-driven trials to ensure efficient identification of treatments with the most favorable risk:benefit ratio.

Combined modality therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. among both men and women. Approximately 45% of patients present with stage III disease. A proportion of these patients is amenable to surgical resection; however, the majority are "unresectable." For patients with unresectable stage IIIA/B disease, thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) was considered the standard of care until the late 1980s despite a very poor 5-year survival rate. Several clinical trials demonstrated that the combination of chemotherapy and TRT was superior to TRT alone. Based on these data, combined modality therapy became the standard of care for patients with good performance status. Recent trials have shown that concurrent chemoradiotherapy offers a significant survival advantage over sequential chemoradiotherapy. Despite a substantial number of clinical trials, important questions on the optimal treatment paradigm remain. The most effective chemotherapy combination, the use of induction or consolidation chemotherapy in addition to the concurrent portion of therapy, and the optimal dose of chemotherapy with concurrent TRT have yet to be determined. The optimal total dose, fractionation, acceleration, treatment volume, and tumor targeting remain questions related to the TRT portion of therapy. Although significant progress has been made, the majority of patients experience locoregional or distant progression of their disease and die within 5 years of diagnosis. Thus, continued development and participation in clinical trials is crucial to further improvements in the treatment of patients with stage III disease.