CNS metastases in breast cancer: old challenge, new frontiers

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib-based regimens in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective real-world data study

OBJECTIVE

Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown efficacy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study explored the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC patients in the real world.

METHODS

From September 2018 to February 2022, 137 female patients with HER2-positive MBC treated in this center were enrolled in this study. The follow-up period ended on January 12, 2023. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), central nervous system (CNS)-PFS, CNS-ORR, CNS-CBR, CNS-DCR, and adverse event (AE) were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The ORR, DCR and CBR were 41.98 % (55/131), 87.79 % (115/131) and 44.27 % (58/131) in this cohort, respectively. The median PFS for this cohort was 10.37 months [95 % confidence interval (CI): 9.205-11.535] and the median OS was 37.53 months (not reached). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that trastuzumab sensitivity was an independent predictor of improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.579 (0.371-0.904, p=0.016)] and improved OS [0.410 (0.213-0.790, p=0.008)]. Patients treated with a pyrotinib-based regimen as second-line and third-or-post-line therapy had poorer PFS [second-line: 3.315 (1.832-6.000, p<0.001); third-or-post-line: 3.304 (1.749-6.243, p<0.001)] and OS [second-line: 4.631 (1.033-20.771, p=0.045); third-or-post-line: 5.738 (1.212-27.174, p=0.028)]. There were 38 brain metastases (BM) patients in this study, the CNS-mPFS [14.37 months (7.815-20.925) vs. 7.83 months (7.047-8.613), p=0.375] and mOS [not reached vs. 36.40 months (18.551-54.249), p=0.034] were better in brain radiotherapy (BRT) group than NBRT group. 18.98 % (26/137) of patients experienced grade 3 or higher diarrhea. No AE-related death was reported.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the promising antitumor activity and acceptable safety of real-world pyrotinib-based regimens for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC patients, particularly those who are trastuzumab-sensitive and who are receiving pyrotinib-based regimens as advanced first-line therapy. It has also been demonstrated that these regimens combined with BRT, provide better intracranial responses and long-term survival benefits for these patients with BM.

Case report: outcome of anlotinib treatment in breast cancer patient with brain metastases

Brain metastases (BM) represent a common and severe complication of breast cancer (BC), emerging in approximately 10%-16% of all BC patients. The prevalent approach for treating BC patients with BM encompasses a multimodal strategy, combining surgery, whole brain radiation therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Yet, a concrete guideline for localized treatment strategies remains elusive, while systemic treatments like small-molecule-targeted therapy and immunotherapy are still in the clinical trial phase. This case study presents a significant clinical response to anlotinib treatment in a patient with estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, complicated by BM. After the standard first-line treatment including albumin-bound paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, and a second-line treatment involving pyrotinib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy did not produce the desired results, the patient was then administered anlotinib in combination with pyrotinib and letrozole as a third-line treatment, which led to a partial response (PR). The findings suggest that anti-angiogenic therapy, specifically anlotinib, could be regarded as a promising therapeutic option for BC patients with BM.

Genomic Discovery and Structure-Activity Exploration of a Novel Family of Enzyme-Activated Covalent Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors

Fungi have historically been the source of numerous important medicinal compounds, but full exploitation of their genetic potential for drug development has been hampered in traditional discovery paradigms. Here we describe a radically different approach, top-down drug discovery (TD3), starting with a massive digital search through a database of over 100,000 fully genomicized fungi to identify loci encoding molecules with a predetermined human target. We exemplify TD3 by the selection of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) as targets and the discovery of two molecules, 1 and 2, which inhibit therapeutically important human CDKs. 1 and 2 exhibit a remarkable mechanism, forming a site-selective covalent bond to the CDK active site Lys. We explored the structure-activity relationship via semi- and total synthesis, generating an analog, 43, with improved kinase selectivity, bioavailability, and efficacy. This work highlights the power of TD3 to identify mechanistically and structurally novel molecules for the development of new medicines.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Central Nervous System Neoplasms in Adults: CNS Metastases

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms, with an increasing incidence that is due in part to an overall increase in primary cancers, improved neuroimaging modalities leading to increased detection, better systemic therapies, and longer patient survival.

OBJECTIVE

To identify cancer patients at a higher risk of developing CNS metastases and to evaluate associated prognostic factors.

METHODS

Review of imaging referral guidelines, response criteria, interval imaging assessment, modality of choice, as well as the association of clinical, serological, and imaging findings as per various cancer societies.

RESULTS

Quantitative response assessment of target and non-target brain metastases as well as an interval imaging protocol set up based on primary histological diagnosis and therapy status are discussed as per various cancer societies and imaging programs.

CONCLUSION

Predictive factors in the primary tumor as well as independent variables of brain metastases like size, number, and response to therapy are necessary in management. The location of CNS metastases, symptomatic disease, as well as follow up imaging findings form a skeletal plan to prognosticate the disease, keeping in mind all the available new advanced therapy options of surgery, radiation, and immunotherapy that improve patient outcome significantly.

Whole-brain radiation therapy plus simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases from breast cancers

Background

The effect of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) plus simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in brain metastasis from breast cancers has not been demonstrated.

Method

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed consecutive breast cancer patients who developed brain metastasis and were treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy plus WBRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-SIB approaches. We analyzed clinical outcomes, prognostic factors and patterns of treatment failure.

Result

A total of 27 patients were eligible for analysis. Four (14.8%) patients achieved clinical complete response and 14 (51.9%) had partial response of brain lesions. The other nine patients were not evaluated for brain tumor response. The median brain progression-free survival was 8.60 (95% CI [6.43-13.33]) months and the median overall survival was 16.8 (95% CI [13.3-27.7]) months. Three patients had in-field failure, five had out-field failure and two had in-field and out-field failure.

Conclusion

WBRT plus SIB led to improved tumor control and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis.

Association Between 18F-FDG PET Activity and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET could help differentiate HER2-positive from HER2-negative breast cancer brain metastases.

Methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study of a cohort of 14 histologically proven breast cancer brain metastases, we analyzed both preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and HER2 status of the resected/biopsied brain specimens. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the lesions were normalized to contralateral normal white matter and compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

The study cohort was comprised of 12 women with breast cancer with a mean age of 59 years (range: 43-76 years) with a total of 14 distinct brain metastatic lesions. The SUVmax ratio of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases was significantly greater than that of HER2-negative lesions (3.98 vs 1.79, U = 38.00, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

The SUVmax ratio may help to identify the HER2 status of breast cancer brain metastases, if validated prospectively.

Standard-of-Care Treatment for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Options

Prior to the advent of the HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, HER2+ breast cancer (BC) was considered an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Over the past 25 years, innovations in molecular biology, pathology, and early therapeutics have transformed the treatment landscape. With the advent of multiple HER2-directed therapies, there have been immense improvements in oncological outcomes in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Currently, 8 HER2-targeted therapies are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of early-stage and/or advanced/metastatic disease. Nonetheless, approximately 25% of patients develop recurrent disease or metastasis after HER2-targeted therapy and most patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) die from their disease. Given the many mechanisms of resistance to HER2-directed therapy, there is a pressing need to further personalize care for patients with HER2+ MBC, by the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers, and the development of novel therapies and combination regimens to overcome therapeutic resistance. Of particular interest are established and novel antibody-drug conjugates, as well as other novel therapeutics and multifaceted approaches to harness the immune system (checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and vaccine therapy). Herein, we discuss standard-of-care treatment of HER2+ MBC, including the management of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Furthermore, we highlight novel treatment approaches for HER2+ MBC, including endeavors to personalize therapy, and discuss ongoing controversies and challenges.

Abemaciclib-induced lung damage leading to discontinuation in brain metastases from breast cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

This case report addresses the dearth of effective therapeutic interventions for central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. It presents a unique case of a woman with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who developed brain metastasis. The report highlights her initial favorable response to abemaciclib and letrozole therapy prior to the discontinuation due to drug-induced lung damage (DILD).

CASE SUMMARY

In this comprehensive case summary, we present the clinical course of a woman in her 60s, who 11 years following primary breast cancer surgery, was diagnosed with multiple brain metastases. As a third-line systemic therapy, she underwent treatment with abemaciclib and letrozole. This treatment approach yielded a near-partial response in her metastatic brain lesions. However, abemaciclib administration ceased due to the emergence of DILD, as confirmed by a computed tomography scan. The DILD improved after 1 mo of cessation. Despite ongoing therapeutic efforts, the patient's condition progressively deteriorated, ultimately resulting in death due to progression of the brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the challenge of managing adverse events in responsive brain metastasis patients, given the scarcity of therapeutic options.

Multidisciplinary management of HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: An evidence-based pragmatic approach moving from pathophysiology to clinical data

INTRODUCTION

About 30-50 % of stage IV HER2+ breast cancers (BC) will present brain metastases (BMs). Their management is based on both local treatment and systemic therapy. Despite therapeutic advances, BMs still impact on survival and quality of life and the development of more effective systemic therapies represents an unmet clinical need.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough analysis of the published literature including ongoing clinical trials has been performed, investigating concepts spanning from the pathophysiology of tumor microenvironment to clinical considerations with the aim to summarize the current and future locoregional and systemic strategies.

RESULTS

Different trials have investigated monotherapies and combination treatments, highlighting how the blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a major problem hindering diffusion and consequently efficacy of such options. Trastuzumab has long been the mainstay of systemic therapy and over the last two decades other HER2-targeted agents including lapatinib, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine, as well as more recently neratinib, tucatinib, and trastuzumab deruxtecan, have been introduced in clinical practice after showing promising results in randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

We ultimately propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm for clinicians treating HER2 + BCs patients with BMs.

Clinicogenomic factors and treatment patterns among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases in the United States

BACKGROUND

This retrospective, real-world study evaluated the prevalence of brain metastases, clinicodemographic characteristics, systemic treatments, and factors associated with overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the US. We also described the genomic characterization of 180 brain metastatic specimens and frequency of clinically actionable genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

De-identified electronic health records-derived data of adult patients diagnosed with aNSCLC between 2011 and 2017 were analyzed from a US-nationwide clinicogenomic database.

RESULTS

Of 3257 adult patients with aNSCLC included in the study, approximately 31% (n = 1018) had brain metastases. Of these 1018 patients, 71% (n = 726) were diagnosed with brain metastases at initial NSCLC diagnosis; 57% (n = 583) of patients with brain metastases received systemic treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy combinations were the most common first-line therapy; single-agent chemotherapies, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and platinum-based chemotherapy combinations were used in second line. Patients with brain metastases had a 1.56 times greater risk of death versus those with no brain metastases. In the brain metastatic specimens (n = 180), a high frequency of genomic alterations in the p53, MAPK, PI3K, mTOR, and cell-cycle associated pathways was observed.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of brain metastases at initial clinical presentation and associated poor prognosis for patients in this cohort underscores the importance of early screening for brain metastasis in NSCLC. Genomic alterations frequently identified in this study emphasize the continued need for genomic research and investigation of targeted therapies in patients with brain metastases.

The tumor-nerve circuit in breast cancer

It is well established that innervation is one of the updated hallmarks of cancer and that psychological stress promotes the initiation and progression of cancer. The breast tumor environment includes not only fibroblasts, adipocytes, endothelial cells, and lymphocytes but also neurons, which is increasingly discovered important in breast cancer progression. Peripheral nerves, especially sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory nerves, have been reported to play important but different roles in breast cancer. However, their roles in the breast cancer progression and treatment are still controversial. In addition, the brain is one of the favorite sites of breast cancer metastasis. In this review, we first summarize the innervation of breast cancer and its mechanism in regulating cancer growth and metastasis. Next, we summarize the neural-related molecular markers in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. In addition, we review drugs and emerging technologies used to block the interactions between nerves and breast cancer. Finally, we discuss future research directions in this field. In conclusion, the further research in breast cancer and its interactions with innervated neurons or neurotransmitters is promising in the clinical management of breast cancer.

Long-term survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: subanalysis of the BMBC registry

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients develop brain metastases (BM). Prognosis of patients with BM is poor and long-term survival is rare. Identification of factors associated with long-term survival is important for improving treatment modalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2889 patients of the national registry for BM in BC (BMBC) were available for this analysis. Long-term survival was defined as overall survival (OS) in the upper third of the failure curve resulting in a cut-off of 15 months. A total of 887 patients were categorized as long-term survivors.

RESULTS

Long-term survivors compared to other patients were younger at BC and BM diagnosis (median 48 versus 54 years and 53 versus 59 years), more often had HER2-positive tumors (59.1% versus 36.3%), less frequently luminal-like (29.1% versus 35.7%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (11.9% versus 28.1%), showed better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) at the time of BM diagnosis (ECOG 0-1, 76.9% versus 51.0%), higher pathological complete remission rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (21.6% versus 13.7%) and lower number of BM (n = 1, BM 40.9% versus 25.4%; n = 2-3, BM 26.5% versus 26.7%; n ≥4, BM 32.6% versus 47.9%) (P < 0.001). Long-term survivors had leptomeningeal metastases (10.4% versus 17.5%) and extracranial metastases (ECM, 73.6% versus 82.5%) less frequently, and asymptomatic BM more often at the time of BM diagnosis (26.5% versus 20.1%), (P < 0.001). Median OS in long-term survivors was about two times higher than the cut-off of 15 months: 30.9 months [interquartile range (IQR) 30.3] overall, 33.9 months (IQR 37.1) in HER2-positive, 26.9 months (IQR 22.0) in luminal-like and 26.5 months (IQR 18.2) in TNBC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, long-term survival of BC patients with BM was associated with better ECOG PS, younger age, HER2-positive subtype, lower number of BM and less extended visceral metastases. Patients with these clinical features might be more eligible for extended local brain and systemic treatment.

Treatment options for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Many systemic treatment options are available for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer brain metastases. However, it is unclear which pharmacological treatment option is the most beneficial.

Methods

We searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and conference abstracts according to keywords. We extracted progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) data, and overall response rate (ORR) from randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis treatment for meta-analysis and analyzed different drug-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

Three randomized controlled trials and seven single-arm clinical studies with 731 patients with HER2-positive brain metastases from breast cancer involving at least seven drugs were included. In randomized controlled trials, our results showed that trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improved PFS and OS in patients and was superior to other drug regimens. In the single-arm study, the ORR was more pronounced for the trastuzumab deruxtecan and pyrotinib plus capecitabine regimens (ORR, 73.33%; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 44.90%-92.21%; ORR, 74.58%; 95% CI, 61.56%-85.02%, respectively). We found that the main AEs of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) were nausea and fatigue, while the main AE of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs and large monoclonal antibodies was diarrhea.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab deruxtecan was shown to be the most significant in improving survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases in network meta-analysis, and in single-arm study, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan and pyrotinib plus capecitabine regimen had the highest ORR. The main AEs associated with ADC, large monoclonal antibodies, and TKI drugs were nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea, respectively.

Current Standards and Future Outlooks in Metastatic Her2-Positive Breast Cancer

Background

Approximately 20% of all breast cancer cases show overexpression or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) [Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(4):632-41]. With the introduction of trastuzumab, lapatinib, and pertuzumab to the realm of treatment, a new era of antibody-drug conjugates had only begun. Within the last two decades, survival for patients with this tumor subtype has fundamentally improved.

Summary

Beginning with a taxane plus trastuzumab/pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab deruxtecan, the first- and second-line treatments are set in stone. With the introduction of tucatinib as a newer tyrosine kinase inhibitor in combination with capecitabine and trastuzumab, there is one efficient line of treatment available after trastuzumab deruxtecan or even earlier in selected cases with active brain metastasis. Especially for later stages of disease, several combination strategies are under investigation. There is still a lack of positive results on immune checkpoint inhibition combined with Her2-targeted therapy, but hopefully an extension to the treatment algorithm will be on its way soon.

Key Messages

With the HER2CLIMB trial, patients with brain metastasis were no longer excluded from bigger trials, and international guidelines implemented its presence or absence in their decision trees [N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):597-609]. Curing Her2-positive metastatic breast cancer, or at least living a long life with this disease, is increasingly becoming a reality.

Efficacy and safety of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with colorectal cancer: What should we expect from a meta-analysis?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an effective therapeutic target for breast and stomach cancers. However, the application of HER2-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of HER2-targeted therapy in CRC by performing a meta-analysis of relevant studies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov database to retrieve relevant studies. STATA 16 was used for the statistical analysis. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of treatment‑related adverse events (TRAEs) were used as the outcome indicators analyzed by random- or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients from nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall ORR and DCR were 27.5% (95% CI 16.8% to 39.6%) and 68.9% (95% CI 55.4% to 81.0%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found in PFS among these studies and the overall median PFS was 4.35 months (95% CI 3.70 to 4.99). The overall incidence of all-grade and grade 3 or higher adverse events were 93.5% (95% CI 88.4% to 97.4%) and 16.8% (95% CI 4.8% to 33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-targeted therapy was confirmed as a promising treatment for colorectal cancer, warranting further high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials to verify.

HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases responds favorably to pyrotinib and trastuzumab-based treatment: A case report and literature review

For HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with the brain involved at initial diagnosis, there was no standard regimen before 2022 when the HER2CLIMB trial published its final overall survival analysis, and the prognosis is relatively poor under the current treatment strategy. We herein reported a case of a female patient who was initially diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases, receiving pyrotinib and trastuzumab-based systematic therapy after palliative craniocerebral radiotherapy as the first-line systematic therapy. During the treatment, the tumor lesions showed obvious regression, and chemotherapy drugs were gradually removed from the regimen. The patient continued receiving trastuzumab and pyrotinib for HER2-targeted therapy. She had achieved more than 26 months of progression-free survival and the disease was stable during the evaluation in April 2022. Radiotherapy followed by dual HER2-targeted therapy of macromolecular monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and micromolecular TKI pyrotinib plus chemotherapy could be an alternative option for this subtype of patients and need to be further verified by future clinical trials.

Systemic treatments for breast cancer brain metastasis

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in females and BC brain metastasis (BCBM) is considered as the second most frequent brain metastasis. Although the advanced treatment has significantly prolonged the survival in BC patients, the prognosis of BCBM is still poor. The management of BCBM remains challenging. Systemic treatments are important to maintain control of central nervous system disease and improve patients' survival. BCBM medical treatment is a rapidly advancing area of research. With the emergence of new targeted drugs, more options are provided for the treatment of BM. This review features currently available BCBM treatment strategies and outlines novel drugs and ongoing clinical trials that may be available in the future. These treatment strategies are discovered to be more efficacious and potent, and present a paradigm shift in the management of BCBMs.

Assessment of Spinal Metastases Surgery Risk Stratification Tools in Breast Cancer by Molecular Subtype

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer molecular features and modern therapies are not included in spine metastasis prediction algorithms.

OBJECTIVE

To examine molecular differences and the impact of postoperative systemic therapy to improve prognosis prediction for spinal metastases surgery and aid surgical decision making.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multi-institutional study of patients who underwent spine surgery for symptomatic breast cancer spine metastases from 2008 to 2021 at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital. We studied overall survival, stratified by breast cancer molecular subtype, and calculated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and laboratory values. We tested the performance of established models (Tokuhashi, Bauer, Skeletal Oncology Research Group, New England Spinal Metastases Score) to predict and compare all-cause.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients surgically treated for breast cancer spine metastases were identified (100% female sex; median age, 56 years [IQR, 36-84 years]). The 1-year probabilities of survival for hormone receptor positive, hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+, and triple-negative breast cancer were 63% (45 of 71), 83% (10 of 12), 0% (0 of 3), and 12% (1 of 8), respectively ( P < .001). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a higher proportion of visceral metastases, brain metastases, and poor physical activity at baseline. Postoperative chemotherapy and endocrine therapy were associated with prolonged survival. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group prognostic model had the highest discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.81]). The performance of all prognostic scores improved when preoperative molecular data and postoperative systemic treatment plans was considered.

CONCLUSION

Spine metastases risk tools were able to predict prognosis at a significantly higher degree after accounting for molecular features which guide treatment response.

Pyrotinib combining with radiotherapy on breast cancer with brain metastasis

With the extensive application of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) targeted therapy, the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) has been improved greatly. Due to the lack of prospective randomized controlled studies; however, the treatment of active brain metastasis (BM) remains a difficulty in clinic. Based upon the retrospective studies, an effective approach of radiotherapy combined with pyrotinib in HER2-positive BCBM treatment was investigated in present research. In all, 29 patients who had active BM in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) combined with pyrotinib from January 2019 to May 2021 were enrolled. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), objective response rate (ORR), and drug-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed among patients undergoing WBRT combined with concurrent or sequence pyrotinib + capecitabine. After the systematic treatments using WBRT combined with pyrotinib + capecitabine, the mPFS and mOS of BM patients were 6.5 months and 15.5 months, respectively. PFS (7.2 vs 6.2 months, p = 0.038) and OS (19.0 vs 14.0 months, p = 0.014) were longer after sequence treatments than those after concurrent treatment. The central nervous system (CNS) ORR of sequence treatment was superior to that of concurrent treatment (80.4% vs 58.6%, p < 0.05). Vomiting (17.2%) and diarrhea (10.3%) were the most common adverse reactions ⩾ grade 3. WBRT combined with pyrotinib is safe and effective for the treatments of active BM in HER2-positive BC. WBRT combined with sequence pyrotinib + capecitabine is more effective and less toxic than concurrent treatment. Therefore, sequence treatment is potentially a preferred regimen for patients with active BM in HER2-positive BC. The size and number of BM lesions, presence or absence of hepatic metastasis, and combination mode of radiotherapy and targeted therapy are independent risk factors for active BM prognosis.

Pyrotinib-based treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

Extensive application of anti-HER2 targeted therapy improves significantly the HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) prognosis, however, it is still difficult to treat brain metastasis. In current study, we explored effective approaches via combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis in patients with HER2-positive advanced BC based upon clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Current study included 61 HER2-positive BC patients with brain metastases (BM) who were treated by pyrotinib-based regimens. The systemic regimens included pyrotinib combined with capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel, and pyrotinib combined with vinorelbine. Patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and objective response rate (ORR), as well as drug-related adverse events (AEs) in regard of each combination regimen were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pyrotinib-based systemic therapy resulted in 8.6 months median PFS (mPFS) and 18.0 months median OS (mOS) among the BM patients. Regarding different regimens, the combination of pyrotinib with nab-paclitaxel was superior to the combination with capecitabine and vinorelbine with respect to PFS and OS. The central nervous system (CNS) ORR did not showcase significant difference among 3 regimens, however, nab-paclitaxel combined regimen obtained the best peripheral ORR (84.6%) (p ≤ .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib-based combination therapy is safe for HER2-positive brain metastasis treatment. Compared with vinorelbine or capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel is more effective with less toxicity, which is the preferable regimen for HER2-positive brain metastasis.KEY MESSAGESPresent investigation investigated effective methods through combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis with HER2-positive advanced brain cancer. The outcomes verified that pyrotinib-based combination therapy was safe and efficient to treat HER2-positive brain metastasis. Therefore, it is effective to treat brain metastasis applying anti-HER2 targeted therapies although pyrotinib showcases efficiency regarding its treatments for the metastasis.

Antitumor response and quality of life: is there a need to sacrifice? Clinical observation: long-term and safe control of the disease using a combination of ribociclib with letrozole. Case report

Metastatic luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC) occupies a leading place in the global structure of morbidity and mortality among women. The current gold standard of first-line treatment is the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors, among which ribociclib with letrozole is distinguished. According to the MONALEESA-2 study, the addition of ribociclib to letrozole significantly increased the median overall survival to 63.9 months, reducing the risk of death by 24%. The safety profile of the combination is manageable, and the development of adverse events led to the interruption of therapy only in 7.5% of cases. A study of the actual clinical practice of CompLEEment-1 also confirmed the safety and effectiveness of the combination. Maintaining and improving the quality of life is one of the main tasks in the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC. According to the MONALEESA-2 study, the addition of ribociclib significantly affects the maintenance of quality of life and leads to a decrease in the intensity of pain syndrome. The published data allowed us to assign a combination of ribociclib and letrozole 4 points on the ESMO-MCBS scale. The safety of long-term use of the combination in the first line of treatment illustrated by clinical observation. The patient's progression-free survival during therapy was 40 months, which significantly exceeds the data of the MONALEESA-2 and CompLEEment-1 studies. The maximum effect (partial response according to RECIST 1.1 -40%) achieved after 24 weeks and persisted for 24 months. Clinically, the patient noted a decrease in the severity of the pain syndrome after 8 weeks of therapy. Against the background of therapy, it was possible to maintain the quality of life without sacrificing antitumor efficacy.

Impact of intestinal dysbiosis on breast cancer metastasis and progression

Breast cancer has a high mortality rate among malignant tumors, with metastases identified as the main cause of the high mortality. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota has become a key factor in the development, treatment, and prognosis of breast cancer. The many microorganisms that make up the gut flora have a symbiotic relationship with their host and, through the regulation of host immune responses and metabolic pathways, are involved in important physiologic activities in the human body, posing a significant risk to health. In this review, we build on the interactions between breast tissue (including tumor tissue, tissue adjacent to the tumor, and samples from healthy women) and the microbiota, then explore factors associated with metastatic breast cancer and dysbiosis of the gut flora from multiple perspectives, including enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, antibiotic use, changes in gut microbial metabolites, changes in the balance of the probiotic environment and diet. These factors highlight the existence of a complex relationship between host-breast cancer progression-gut flora. Suggesting that gut flora dysbiosis may be a host-intrinsic factor affecting breast cancer metastasis and progression not only informs our understanding of the role of microbiota dysbiosis in breast cancer development and metastasis, but also the importance of balancing gut flora dysbiosis and clinical practice.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Spotlight on HER2

ABSTRACT

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are composed of monoclonal antibodies linked to a cytotoxic payload, enabling targeted delivery of more potent chemotherapy. In the past decade, there has been rapid development of ADCs aimed at different types of breast cancer. The success of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has led to the evolution of several ADCs targeting HER2-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab-emtansine, the first approved ADC targeting HER2-positive breast cancer, has become standard of care for patients with high-risk early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More recently, the observation of the bystander effect, in which ADCs target both antigen-positive cells and adjacent antigen-negative cells, has led to the reclassification of "HER2-low" breast cancer and the development of trastuzumab-deruxtecan to target this population. This article reviews the history of HER2-directed ADCs in breast cancer as well as ongoing ADCs in development.

Surface modified Genistein phytosome for Breast Cancer Treatment: In-vitro Appraisal, Pharmacokinetics, and In-vivo Antitumor Efficacy

Based on phytosomes advantages over liposomes, hyaluronic acid (HA) with/out pegylated phospholipid was used to develop surface-modified genistein (Gen) phytosome as Gen pegylated hyaluophytosomes (G-PHA) and Gen hyaluophytosomes (G-HA) as novel delivery systems for breast cancer treatment. In this study, in-vitro characterization of G-HA and G-PHA shows PS 144.2 ±1.266 nm and 220.3 ±2.51 nm, ZP -30.9 ±0.75 and -32.06 ±0.305 respectively. Morphological elucidation shows HA covers the surface of G-HA and the presence of a transparent layer of PEG surrounding G-PHA. In-vitro release shows a significant slow Gen release from G-HA, and G-PHA compared to Gen solution and Gen phytosomes. In-vivo bioavailability data shows improvement in bioavailability for G-HA and G-PHA compared to Gen suspension (AUC_0- T: :3.563 ±0.067, 2.092 ±0.058, 0.374 ±0.085 µg/ml*h respectively). Therapeutic evaluation of the prepared targeted formulations was carried out by subcutaneous injection in an EAC-induced breast cancer model in mice. G-HA and G-PHA show a promising chemotherapeutic effect in terms of lowering the tumor size and tumor biomarkers (CEA: -34.6, -44.7 & CA15.3: -77.8, -81.6 respectively). This reduction in their values compared to Gen phytosomes, Gen suspension, and the control group is attributed to high Gen accumulation at the target organ owing to targeting properties of HA that are used in phytosomal surface modification in G-HA. Additionally, the presence of MPEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE in G-PHA tends to improve interstitium lymphatic drainage following SC administration, resulting in maximizing the therapeutic benefits of breast cancer despite the difference in pharmacokinetics behavior compared to G-HA. These formulations can be further studied for metastatic breast cancer.

An FDA-Approved Antifungal, Ketoconazole, and Its Novel Derivative Suppress tGLI1-Mediated Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis by Inhibiting the DNA-Binding Activity of Brain Metastasis-Promoting Transcription Factor tGLI1

The goal of this study is to identify pharmacological inhibitors that target a recently identified novel mediator of breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM), truncated glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (tGLI1). Inhibitors of tGLI1 are not yet available. To identify compounds that selectively kill tGLI1-expressing breast cancer, we screened 1527 compounds using two sets of isogenic breast cancer and brain-tropic breast cancer cell lines engineered to stably express the control, GLI1, or tGLI1 vector, and identified the FDA-approved antifungal ketoconazole (KCZ) to selectively target tGLI1-positive breast cancer cells and breast cancer stem cells, but not tGLI1-negative breast cancer and normal cells. KCZ's effects are dependent on tGLI1. Two experimental mouse metastasis studies have demonstrated that systemic KCZ administration prevented the preferential brain metastasis of tGLI1-positive breast cancer and suppressed the progression of established tGLI1-positive BCBM without liver toxicities. We further developed six KCZ derivatives, two of which (KCZ-5 and KCZ-7) retained tGLI1-selectivity in vitro. KCZ-7 exhibited higher blood-brain barrier penetration than KCZ/KCZ-5 and more effectively reduced the BCBM frequency. In contrast, itraconazole, another FDA-approved antifungal, failed to suppress BCBM. The mechanistic studies suggest that KCZ and KCZ-7 inhibit tGLI1's ability to bind to DNA, activate its target stemness genes Nanog and OCT4, and promote tumor proliferation and angiogenesis. Our study establishes the rationale for using KCZ and KCZ-7 for treating and preventing BCBM and identifies their mechanism of action.

ABL kinases regulate translation in HER2+ cells through Y-box-binding protein 1 to facilitate colonization of the brain

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+/ERBB2) breast cancer often present with brain metastasis. HER2-targeted therapies have not been successful to treat brain metastases in part due to poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrance and emergence of resistance. Here, we report that Abelson (ABL) kinase allosteric inhibitors improve overall survival and impair HER2+ brain metastatic outgrowth in vivo. Mechanistically, ABL kinases phosphorylate the RNA-binding protein Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1). ABL kinase inhibition disrupts binding of YB-1 to the ERBB2 mRNA and impairs translation, leading to a profound decrease in HER2 protein levels. ABL-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of YB-1 promotes HER2 translation. Notably, loss of YB-1 inhibits brain metastatic outgrowth and impairs expression of a subset of ABL-dependent brain metastatic targets. These data support a role for ABL kinases in the translational regulation of brain metastatic targets through YB-1 and offer a therapeutic target for HER2+ brain metastasis patients.

Long‑term remission under Disitamab Vedotin (RC48) in HR‑positive/HER2‑positive metastatic breast cancer with brain meningeal, and bone marrow involvement: A case report

Breast cancer (BC) with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is closely associated with an elevated risk of multiple distant metastases and unfavorable prognosis. Disitamab Vedotin (RC48) is a newly developed antibody-drug conjugate targeting HER2, which is comprised of hertuzumab coupled to monomethyl auristatin E via a cleavable linker. Pre-clinical studies indicated its strong anti-tumor activity in HER2-positive and low HER2 expression models of BC. The present study reported on the case of a 60-year-old postmenopausal female who suffered from fatigue and was diagnosed with a right-sided BC tumor. The diagnosis was stage IV (cT4N3M1) hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma with systemic metastases (brain included). The patient initially responded well to 26 cycles of the first-line anti-HER2 targeted therapy plus chemotherapy (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+nab-paclitaxel) combined with whole-brain radiotherapy. However, both extracranial and intracranial lesions achieved progressive disease (PD), which eventually occurred during 5 sequential cycles of maintenance therapy. Subsequently, 4 cycles of second-line treatment (trastuzumab + pyrotinib + capecitabin) were continued until the levels of blood tumor markers CEA, CA15-3 and CA125 were elevated, and systemic PD was able to be attained (the brain metastases were rated as stable disease). Finally, the patient received RC48 as the third-line therapy and achieved a durable and effective clinical response. To date, the patient has benefited from 12 cycles of RC48 without any severe adverse effects. The overall survival was >3 years. The present study showcased that RC48 was effective and tolerable for a patient with HR- and HER2-positive BMBC.

Local and systemic therapy in breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases

PURPOSE

As survival of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer is poor and incidence rates are increasing, there is a growing need for better treatment strategies. In the current study, the efficacy of local and systemic therapies was analyzed in breast cancer patients with CNS metastases.

METHODS

Medical records from breast cancer patients with brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) treated at a tertiary referral center and a teaching hospital between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively studied. Main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival. Analyses were performed among patients with brain metastases (BM) and patients with LM, for the different systemic and local therapies for CNS metastases, and for subgroups based on breast cancer subtypes.

RESULTS

We identified 155 patients, 97 with BM and 58 with LM. Median OS was 15.9 months for patients with BM and 1.5 months for patients with LM. Median OS was significantly longer for HER2-positive patients with BM (22.8 months) vs triple negative (8.4 months) and hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (5.9 months) (P < 0.001). Patients with BM receiving both local and systemic therapy also had a longer median OS (21.8 months), compared to the other three subgroups (local therapy only: 9.9 months, systemic therapy only: 4.3 months, no therapy: 0.5 months, P < 0.001). No significant difference in OS was observed between different systemic treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients with BM show longest median OS when the subtype is HER2-positive and when they are treated with both local and systemic therapy.

Targeting Cell Cycle Progression in HER2+ Breast Cancer: An Emerging Treatment Opportunity

The development of HER2-targeted therapies has dramatically improved patient survival and patient management and increased the quality of life in the HER2+ breast cancer patient population. Due to the activation of compensatory pathways, patients eventually suffer from resistance to HER2-directed therapies and develop a more aggressive disease phenotype. One of these mechanisms is the crosstalk between ER and HER2 signaling, especially the CDK4/6-Cyclin D-Rb signaling axis that is commonly active and has received attention for its potential role in regulating tumor progression. CDK 4/6 inhibitors interfere with the binding of cell-cycle-dependent kinases (CDKs) with their cognate partner cyclins, and forestall the progression of the cell cycle by preventing Rb phosphorylation and E2F release that consequentially leads to cancer cell senescence. CDK 4/6 inhibitors, namely, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, in combination with anti-estrogen therapies, have shown impressive outcomes in hormonal receptor-positive (HR+) disease and have received approval for this disease context. As an extension of this concept, preclinical/clinical studies incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors with HER2-targeted drugs have been evaluated and have shown potency in limiting tumor progression, restoring therapeutic sensitivity, and may improving the management of the disease. Currently, several clinical trials are examining the synergistic effects of CDK 4/6 inhibitors with optimized HER2-directed therapies for the (ER+/-) HER2+ population in the metastatic setting. In this review, we aim to interrogate the burden of HER2+ disease in light of recent treatment progress in the field and examine the clinical benefit of CDK 4/6 inhibitors as a replacement for traditional chemotherapy to improve outcomes in HER2+ breast cancer.

Characteristics of patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: subanalysis of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Registry

Background

Up to 40% of patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer develop brain metastases (BMs). Understanding of clinical features of these patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs is vital.

Patients and methods

A total of 2948 patients from the Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer registry were available for this analysis, of whom 1311 had primary tumors with the HER2-positive subtype.

Results

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and BMs were—when compared with HER2-negative patients—slightly younger at the time of breast cancer and BM diagnosis, had a higher pathologic complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a higher tumor grade. Furthermore, extracranial metastases at the time of BM diagnosis were less common in HER2-positive patients, when compared with HER2-negative patients. HER2-positive patients had more often BMs in the posterior fossa, but less commonly leptomeningeal metastases. The median overall survival (OS) in all HER2-positive patients was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval 11.4-14.4). The following factors were associated with shorter OS (multivariate analysis): older age at BM diagnosis [≥60 versus <60 years: hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, P < 0.001], lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (2-4 versus 0-1: HR 1.59, P < 0.001), higher number of BMs (2-3 versus 1: HR 1.30, P = 0.082; ≥4 versus 1: HR 1.51, P = 0.004; global P = 0.015), BMs in the fossa anterior (HR 1.71, P < 0.001), leptomeningeal metastases (HR 1.63, P = 0.012), symptomatic BMs at diagnosis (HR 1.35, P = 0.033) and extracranial metastases at diagnosis of BMs (HR 1.43, P = 0.020). The application of targeted therapy after the BM diagnosis (HR 0.62, P < 0.001) was associated with longer OS. HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive patients showed longer OS than HER2-positive/hormone receptor-negative patients (median 14.3 versus 10.9 months; HR 0.86, P = 0.03), but no differences in progression-free survival were seen between both groups.

Conclusions

We identified factors associated with the prognosis of HER2-positive patients with BMs. Further research is needed to understand the factors determining the longer survival of HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive patients.

•

Patients with HER2-positive BMs from breast cancer have the best prognosis compared with other tumor subtypes.

•

Among HER2-positive patients, hormone receptor-positive patients have the longest survival.

•

HER2-targeted therapy is significantly associated with a better prognosis in patients with BMs.

•

On average, two HER2-targeted therapy lines were administered prior to the development of BMs.

•

New compounds are urgently needed to improve the outcome of this subgroup of patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival for advanced male breast cancer

Male breast cancer is a rare disease. Many experiences of male breast cancer were derived of female breast cancer. However, there are huge differences between two groups. We conducted this study to find a reliable prognostic model for advanced male breast cancer. The cohort was selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into training and validation group. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used for prognostic assessment and a nomogram was built. Calibration curves and concordance index were compiled to determine predictive and discriminatory capacity. The time-dependent receiver operating curves and the decision curve analysis was used to verify the model's ability. Two hundred and eighty individuals were enrolled. The cumulative rates of 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 98.6%, 72% and 57.9%. The C-indexes for OS were 0.835 (95%CI, 0.777-0.893) in the training group and 0.765 (95%CI, 0.668-0.862) in the validation group. The calibration curves confirmed the consistency of the nomogram both in the training and validation group. The time-dependent receiver operating curves and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram had better prediction capacity than TNM stage system for advanced male breast cancer. The nomogram we built was a reliable and solid predictive model.

Brain Microvascular Pericytes—More than Bystanders in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Brain tissue contains the highest number of perivascular pericytes compared to other organs. Pericytes are known to regulate brain perfusion and to play an important role within the neurovascular unit (NVU). The high phenotypic and functional plasticity of pericytes make this cell type a prime candidate to aid physiological adaptations but also propose pericytes as important modulators in diverse pathologies in the brain. This review highlights known phenotypes of pericytes in the brain, discusses the diverse markers for brain pericytes, and reviews current in vitro and in vivo experimental models to study pericyte function. Our current knowledge of pericyte phenotypes as it relates to metastatic growth patterns in breast cancer brain metastasis is presented as an example for the crosstalk between pericytes, endothelial cells, and metastatic cells. Future challenges lie in establishing methods for real-time monitoring of pericyte crosstalk to understand causal events in the brain metastatic process.

Ribociclib plus letrozole in subgroups of special clinical interest with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analysis of the phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 trial

Background

The phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 study evaluated ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Outcomes were investigated in the following subgroups: central nervous system (CNS) metastases, prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2, and visceral metastases plus prior chemotherapy for advanced disease or ECOG PS 2.

Patients and methods

Patients with HR+, HER2– ABC without prior hormonal treatment for advanced disease received oral ribociclib (600 mg once daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg once daily, continuous). Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability, assessed via occurrence of adverse events (AEs); key secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), overall response rate, and clinical benefit rate.

Results

51 patients had CNS metastases, 194 received prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, 112 had ECOG PS 2, 146 had visceral metastases plus prior chemotherapy, and 77 had visceral metastases plus ECOG PS 2. Safety results were consistent with those in the overall CompLEEment-1 population; no new safety concerns were identified. The AE profile was manageable with low rates of discontinuations due to AEs. TTP in patients with CNS metastases was consistent with the overall study population and shorter for other patient subgroups. Each patient subgroup achieved meaningful clinical benefit from treatment, consistent with the overall population.

Conclusion

These findings confirm the clinical benefit of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in high-risk patient subgroups of clinical interest commonly underrepresented in clinical trials.

•

CompLEEment-1 evaluated ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with HR+, HER2– ABC.

•

Outcomes were evaluated in 5 patient subgroups with traditionally poor prognosis.

•

The AE profile was manageable; there were low rates of discontinuations due to AEs.

•

Patients in each subgroup achieved meaningful clinical benefit from treatment.

Unraveling Cancer Metastatic Cascade Using Microfluidics-based Technologies

Cancer has long been a leading cause of death. The primary tumor, however, is not the main cause of death in more than 90% of cases. It is the complex process of metastasis that makes cancer deadly. The invasion metastasis cascade is the multi-step biological process of cancer cell dissemination to distant organ sites and adaptation to the new microenvironment site. Unraveling the metastasis process can provide great insight into cancer death prevention or even treatment. Microfluidics is a promising platform, that provides a wide range of applications in metastasis-related investigations. Cell culture microfluidic technologies for in vitro modeling of cancer tissues with fluid flow and the presence of mechanical factors have led to the organ-on-a-chip platforms. Moreover, microfluidic systems have also been exploited for capturing and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that provide crucial information on the metastatic behavior of a tumor. We present a comprehensive review of the recent developments in the application of microfluidics-based systems for analysis and understanding of the metastasis cascade from a wider perspective.

Under-served groups remain underserved as eligibility criteria routinely exclude them from breast cancer trials

OBJECTIVES

Under-served groups are populations unrepresented or disengaged from medical research or services despite a disproportionately high healthcare burden. Under-served groups may be directly (age, pregnancy as examples) or indirectly excluded (provision of written information in one language only as example) from trial enrolment by strict eligibility exclusions. The purpose of our study was to assess eligibility criteria in published phase III breast cancer clinical trials to determine whether they excluded under-served groups either directly, or indirectly.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Medline was searched for phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating interventional drugs for breast cancer in high-impact journals published between January 1^st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020. 5133 eligible trials were returned and 40 selected, by simple randomization, for inclusion.

RESULTS

All 40 trials had multiple exclusions that affected recruitment of under-served groups. Clinical or scientific rationale for the recorded inclusion and exclusion criteria was under-reported in 39 of 40 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial eligibility criteria exclude under-served groups from breast cancer trials. Trialists should provide a justification for each eligibility criterion and funders, reviewers, ethics committees, and others should demand one. Without this under-served groups will remain just that: under-served.

Salvage Treatment for Progressive Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Thirty percent of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, and 15% of patients with the remaining subtypes of breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Available treatment methods include surgery and radiotherapy. However, some individuals will experience intracranial progression despite prior local treatment. This situation remains a challenge. In the case of progressing lesions amenable to local therapy, the choice of a treatment method must consider performance status, cancer burden, possible toxicity, and previously applied therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy rather than whole-brain radiotherapy should be used only if feasible. If local therapy is unfeasible, selected patients, especially those with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, may benefit from systemic therapy.

Abstract

Survival of patients with breast cancer has increased in recent years due to the improvement of systemic treatment options. Nevertheless, the occurrence of brain metastases is associated with a poor prognosis. Moreover, most drugs do not penetrate the central nervous system because of the blood–brain barrier. Thus, confirmed intracranial progression after local therapy is especially challenging. The available methods of salvage treatment include surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. This narrative review discusses possible strategies of salvage treatment for progressive brain metastases in breast cancer. It covers possibilities of repeated local treatment using the same method as applied previously, other methods of local therapy, and options of salvage systemic treatment. Repeated local therapy may provide a significant benefit in intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival. However, it could lead to significant toxicity. Thus, the choice of optimal methods should be carefully discussed within the multidisciplinary tumor board.

Stereotactic Radiation and Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Single Institution Series

(1) Background: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of fractionated SRT (fSRT) and pertuzumab-trastuzumab (PT) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). (2) Methods: Patients with HER2+ BCBM who received FSRT from 2015 to 2019 were identified. Patients were included if they were treated with fSRT within 21 days of receiving PT. All lesions were treated with LINAC-based fSRT to a total dose of 27 Gy delivered in three consecutive fractions. All patients received concurrent PT. Patients were evaluated 4-6 weeks after SRS and subsequently every 2-3 months with MRI re-imaging (3) Results: A total of 49 patients with HER2+ brain metastases were identified. Of these patients, a total of 10 patients with 32 HER2+ BCBM were treated with concurrent SRT and PT and included in the analysis. No local progression was observed. Overall response rate was 68.7%. Only one patient developed asymptomatic radionecrosis. Median time to BM occurrence was 15.6 (range: 1-40.5 months). Distant intracranial failure occurred in 4/10 patients (40.0%). Overall BCBM median survival was 33.9 months (95%CI 24.1-43.6). Mean duration of PT treatment was 27.9 months (range: 10.1-53.7 months). (4) Conclusions: In our single institution experience, fSRT and PT showed to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with an adequate overall response rate.

Brain metastases: increasingly precision medicine-a narrative review

Objective

To broadly review the modern management of brain metastases.

Background

Brain metastases are the commonest neurological manifestation of cancer and a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients. Brain metastases are increasing in frequency, as a result of longer life expectancy of cancer patients, more sensitive methods for brain metastasis detection and an ageing population. The proportional incidence of brain metastases according to cancer of origin, from greatest to least, is lung cancer, melanoma, renal, breast and colorectal cancers. Patients with lung cancer and melanoma are most likely to have brain metastases at diagnosis. Brain metastases cause a variety of symptoms, depending on their size and location, whether they cause mass effect and oedema, compression of the brain parenchyma, or focal neurological deficits. The major differential diagnoses of brain metastases include primary tumours and vascular/inflammatory lesions. Prognosis is dependent on the site, number and volume of lesions, the patients’ performance status, age and the activity and extent of extracranial disease.

Methods

English literature articles in PubMed from 1950 to June 2021 were reviewed. Article bibliographies provided further references.

Conclusions

Treatment of brain metastasis patients has moved from considering them as a homogenous population of patients, to individualised treatment. In those brain metastases patients of satisfactory performance status with a solitary lesion, especially one in a non-eloquent/accessible area causing significant mass effect and/or raised intracranial pressure or for whom the diagnosis is in doubt (histology needed), surgical resection is usually the treatment of choice. For multiple brain metastases, radiotherapy with or without systemic therapies are usually employed. For relatively fit patients with limited numbers of brain metastases (e.g., 4 or less), stereotactic radiosurgery is standard of care. Current clinical trials are testing the efficacy of stereotactic treatment alone for >4 brain metastases (although it is increasingly used for such patients in many centres) as well as integration of local therapies with targeted and immunological therapies in appropriately selected cases. In certain circumstances, cranial irradiation can be omitted.

Alliance A011801 (compassHER2 RD): postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of A011801 (CompassHER2 RD), an ongoing prospective, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial. Eligible patients in the United States (US) and Canada with high-risk (defined as ER-negative and/or node-positive) HER2-positive (HER2+) residual disease (RD) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 and placebo, versus T-DM1 and tucatinib. Patients have also received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, if indicated per standard of care guidelines. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1 plus tucatinib is superior to iDFS with T-DM1 plus placebo; other outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Correlative biomarker, quality of life (QoL) and pharmacokinetic (PK) end points are also evaluated.

Novel prognostic classification predicts overall survival of patients receiving salvage whole-brain radiotherapy for recurrent brain metastasis from breast cancer: A recursive partitioning analysis (KROG 16-12)

Background

To investigate outcomes of salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for recurrent brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC), to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS), and to propose a novel prognostic classification for OS in these patients.

Materials and methods

We identified 54 patients who had received salvage WBRT as the second brain-focused treatment for recurrent BM from BC (2000–2014). The median follow-up duration was 4.9 months. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to develop a model to predict OS at the time of salvage WBRT.

Results

The median OS was 6.8 months. OS according to BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), modified breast-GPA, and updated breast-GPA did not represent our cohort. In the multivariate analysis, a long time before salvage WBRT (≥16 months), control of primary BC or extracranial metastases, systemic treatment after salvage WBRT, and administration of a biologically effective dose for an α/β of 10 Gy (BED10) of salvage WBRT >37.5 Gy showed superior OS. We proposed three RPA classes based on the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and BED10 of salvage WBRT: class I, class II, and class III. In this model, patients with class I experienced the best OS (34.6 months; class II, 5.0 months; class III, 2.4 months; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our RPA classification according to the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and the dose of salvage WBRT, significant differences in OS were observed. The subsequent use of a systemic treatment showed better OS.

•

Multicenter retrospective study of salvage WBRT for recurrent brain metastasis.

•

Subsequent use of systemic treatment after salvage WBRT showing better OS.

•

Limitations of previous graded prognostic assessments for recurrent brain metastasis.

•

Novel RPA classification consisting of four simple clinical factors predicts OS.

HER2-low breast cancer could be associated with an increased risk of brain metastasis

PURPOSE

The HER2-low breast cancer is a newly recognized entity with the clinical characteristics is yet to be defined. We hypothesized that HER2-low breast cancer could lead to an increased rate of brain metastases in patients with localized breast cancer. We tested this hypothesis in a large cohort of breast cancer patients with long follow-up.

METHODS

We included 2686 adult breast cancer patients followed up in Hacettepe University Cancer Center. Patients with 1 + positive HER2 expression and 2 + HER2 expression with a negative FISH were categorized as HER2-low disease. We evaluated the brain metastasis risk with binary logistic regression analyses and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

During a median 95.4 (IQR 72.6-123.1) month follow-up, 184 patients developed brain metastasis (6.9%). The brain metastases were developed in 5.1% of the patients with HER2-negative disease, 8.5% of the patients with HER2-low disease, and 10.1% of the patients with HER2-positive disease. A multivariable binary logistic regression model demonstrated an increased risk of brain metastasis in patients with HER2-low disease (OR: 1.611, 95% CI 1.055-2.460, p = 0.027) and in HER2-positive patients (OR: 1.837, 95% CI 1.308-2.580, p < 0.001). Additionally, HR + -HER2-low disease was associated with a decreased DFS compared to HR + -HER2-negative disease (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed an increased risk of brain metastasis in localized breast cancer patients with HER2-low disease. We think that a high level of vigilance and a low threshold for brain imaging could benefit HER2-low breast cancer patients similar to the patients with HER-positive disease.

Full population results from the core phase of CompLEEment-1, a phase 3b study of ribociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in an expanded population

PURPOSE

CompLEEment-1 is a phase 3b trial in an expanded patient population with hormone receptor-positive (HR +), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), the largest current trial of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in ABC.

METHODS

Patients treated with ≤ 1 line of prior chemotherapy and no prior endocrine therapy for ABC received ribociclib 600 mg/day (3-weeks-on/1-week-off) plus letrozole 2.5 mg/day and additionally monthly goserelin/leuprolide in men and pre-/perimenopausal women. Eligibility criteria allowed inclusion of patients with stable CNS metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability, and secondary objectives were efficacy and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Overall, 3,246 patients were evaluated (median follow-up 25.4 months). Rates of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were 95.2% and 67.5%, respectively. Treatment-related discontinuations due to all grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 12.9% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. Rates of all-grade AEs of special interest (AESI) were as follows: neutropenia (74.5%), increased alanine aminotransferase (16.2%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (14.1%), and QTcF prolongation (6.7%); corresponding values for grade ≥ 3 AESI were 57.2%, 7.7%, 5.7%, and 1.0%, respectively. Median time to progression was 27.1 months (95% confidence interval, 25.7 to not reached). Patient QoL was maintained during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Safety and efficacy data in this expanded population were consistent with the MONALEESA-2 and MONALEESA-7 trials and support the use of ribociclib plus letrozole in the first-line setting for patients with HR + , HER2- ABC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

linicalTrials.gov NCT02941926.

Prognostic value of pretreatment MRI texture features in breast cancer brain metastasis treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) was recommended for treating patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM), but predictions of the existing prognostic models for therapeutic responsiveness vary substantially.

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment clinical, MRI radiologic, and texture features in patients with BCBM undergoing GKS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of 81 BCBMs in 44 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Progressive disease was defined as an increase of at least 20% in the longest diameter of the target lesion or the presence of new intracranial lesions on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) imaging. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CE-T1W images, T2-weighted (T2W) images, and ADC maps. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to identify independent predictors associated with BCBM-specific progression-free survival (PFS). A nomogram was constructed and its calibration ability was assessed.

RESULTS

The cumulative BCBM-specific PFS was 52.27% at six months and 11.36% at one year, respectively. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06; P = 0.004) and CE-T1W-based kurtosis (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57-0.92; P = 0.008) were the independent predictors. The combination of CE-T1W-based kurtosis and age displayed a higher C-index (C-index 0.70; 95% CI 0.63-0.77) than did CE-T1W-based kurtosis (C-index 0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.73) or age (C-index 0.63; 95% CI 0.56-0.70) alone. The nomogram based on the combinative model provided a better performance over age (P < 0.05). The calibration curves elucidated good agreement between prediction and observation for the probability of 7- and 12-month BCBM-specific PFS.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment CE-T1W-based kurtosis combined with age could improve prognostic ability in patients with BCBM undergoing GKS.

Pyrotinib Treatment in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis: Exploratory Final Analysis of Real-World, Multicenter Data

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have poor prognoses. Pyrotinib has shown promising antitumor activity in MBC to improve progression-free survival (PFS). However, findings based on real-world data to analyze whether pyrotinib affects overall survival (OS) remain scarce.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This real-world study is an exploratory analysis of brain metastasis (BM) and the final update of our preceding study of 168 patients with HER2⁺ MBC. PFS, OS, tumor mutation burden (TMB), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pyrotinib treatment led to a median PFS time of 8.00 months and a median OS of 19.07 months in the 168 participants. High TMB was associated with poor OS (P = 0.0072) and PFS (P = 0.0028). In the 39 patients with BM, the median PFS and OS were 8.67 and 13.93 months, respectively. The surgery/radiation (S/R) group of patients with BM had prolonged survival (PFS: 9.97 vs. 7.73 months P = 0.19; OS: 20.67 vs. 12.43 months P = 0.021) compared with the no surgery/no radiation group (NS/NR). The CBR was 58.6% (S/R) vs. 41.4% (NS/NR), while the ORR was 24.1% (S/R) vs. 31.0% (NS/NR).

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib shows promise as a novel pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of BM and should be evaluated further. Surgical or radiotherapy in combination with pyrotinib was found to statistically improve OS in our cohort. TMB could be an exploratory biomarker for predicting PFS and OS, but its clinical application still needs further verification.

Implementing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in HER2-positive breast cancer: state of the art and future directions

The development of anti-HER2 agents has been one of the most meaningful advancements in the management of metastatic breast cancer, significantly improving survival outcomes. Despite the efficacy of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies, concurrent chemotherapy is still needed to maximize response. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of therapeutics that combines an antigen-specific antibody backbone with a potent cytotoxic payload, resulting in an improved therapeutic index. Two anti-HER2 ADCs have been approved by the FDA with different indications in HER2-positive breast cancer. Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was the first-in-class HER2-targeting ADC, initially approved in 2013 for metastatic patients who previously received trastuzumab and a taxane, and the label was expanded in 2019 to include adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based therapy. In 2020, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was the second approved ADC for patients who had received at least 2 lines of anti-HER2-based therapy in the metastatic setting. The success of these two agents has transformed the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer and has re-energized the field of ADC development. Given their advanced pharmaceutical properties, next-generation HER2-targeted ADCs have the potential to be active beyond traditional HER2-positive breast cancer and may be effective in cells with low expression of HER2 or ERBB2 mutations, opening a spectrum of new possible clinical applications. Ongoing challenges include improving target-specificity, optimizing the toxicity profile, and identifying biomarkers for patient selection. The aim of this review is to summarize the principal molecular, clinical, and safety characteristics of approved and experimental anti-HER2 ADCs, contextualizing the current and future landscape of drug development.

The role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer

The introduction of trastuzumab and other subsequent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies dramatically shifted the treatment landscape of HER2+ breast cancer, changing the natural history of the disease. There is no standard-of-care for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in third and later lines of treatment; however, continued use of anti-HER2 therapies is recommended. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target HER2 and other HER family receptors play a central role in this setting. TKIs have demonstrated various degrees of efficacy against central nervous system (CNS) metastases, which are a major clinical challenge for patients with HER2+ MBC. The TKIs lapatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib have received regulatory approval for the treatment of HER2+ MBC, while pyrotinib and afatinib have been evaluated in this setting. These TKIs vary by molecular weight, HER protein specificity and reversibility of binding and in turn have unique safety profiles. Toxicities reported in clinical trials of TKIs in HER2+ MBC that may require specific management strategies include diarrhoea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome and rash. Here, we review the efficacy data, including CNS activity, and the safety profiles of the TKIs, and we provide guidance on adverse event management. Finally, we discuss how to incorporate the TKIs into the HER2+ MBC treatment algorithm.

Autocrine GM-CSF signaling contributes to growth of HER2+ breast leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) occurs when tumor cells spread to the cerebrospinal fluid-containing leptomeninges surrounding the brain and spinal cord. LC is an ominous complication of cancer with a dire prognosis. Although any malignancy can spread to the leptomeninges, breast cancer, particularly the HER2+ subtype, is its most common origin. HER2+ breast LC (HER2+ LC) remains incurable, with few treatment options, and the molecular mechanisms underlying proliferation of HER2+ breast cancer cells in the acellular, protein, and cytokine-poor leptomeningeal environment remain elusive. Therefore, we sought to characterize signaling pathways that drive HER2+ LC development as well as those that restrict its growth to leptomeninges. Primary HER2+ LC patient-derived ("Lepto") cell lines in co-culture with various central nervous system (CNS) cell types revealed that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC), the largest population of dividing cells in the CNS, inhibited HER2+ LC growth in vitro and in vivo, thereby limiting the spread of HER2+ LC beyond the leptomeninges. Cytokine array-based analyses identified Lepto cell-secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an oncogenic autocrine driver of HER2+ LC growth. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based analyses revealed that the OPC-derived protein TPP1 proteolytically degrades GM-CSF, decreasing GM-CSF signaling and leading to suppression of HER2+ LC growth and limiting its spread. Lastly, intrathecal delivery of neutralizing anti-GM-CSF antibodies and a pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor (CCT137690) synergistically inhibited GM-CSF and suppressed activity of GM-CSF effectors, reducing HER2+ LC growth in vivo. Thus, OPC suppress GM-CSF-driven growth of HER2+ LC in the leptomeningeal environment, providing a potential targetable axis.

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors: A new promise for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer represents a heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, including both oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative tumours. A deeper understanding of the crosstalk between ER and HER2 receptor pathways has led to the development of treatment strategies consisting of a simultaneous blockade of both signalling pathways, as a reasonable approach to prevent the onset of mechanisms of resistance.

METHODS

This review was based on the material searched on PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases and on conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 15 December 2020. The search strategy included the following keywords: 'HER2-positive breast cancer', 'CDK4-6 inhibitors' and 'PI3K inhibitors', and was adapted for use with different bibliographic databases.

RESULTS

CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors are two classes of agents already approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Recently, promising data with their use have been also shown in HER2+ disease. Results from preclinical and clinical studies are shedding light on the role of these classes of agents in HER2+ breast cancer, and are paving the road for a forthcoming change in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment landscape for HER2+ breast cancer is rapidly changing, and CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors represent a new promising strategy to improve patients' outcomes.