Telomerase-specific virotherapy in an animal model of human head and neck cancer

An oncolytic virus as a promising candidate for the treatment of radioresistant oral squamous cell carcinoma

We evaluated the usefulness of an oncolytic virus (Suratadenoturev; OBP-301) against radioresistant oral squamous cell carcinoma. We confirmed the expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase and the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor in cell lines. Also, we examined the potential presence in a patient who has received existing therapy that is amenable to treatment with OBP-301. We evaluated: (1) the antitumor effects of OBP-301 alone and in combination with radiotherapy on radioresistant cell lines, (2) the molecular mechanism underlying the radiosensitizing effect and cell death increased by the combination therapy, and (3) the antitumor effect of the combination therapy in vivo using xenograft models (a radioresistant cell line-derived xenograft in mouse and a patient-derived xenograft). Human telomerase reverse transcriptase and the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor were expressed in all cell lines. OBP-301 decreased the proliferative activity of these cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner, and significantly enhanced the antitumor effect of irradiation. Phosphorylated STAT3 and its downstream molecules, which correlated with apoptosis and autophagy, showed significant changes in expression after treatment with OBP-301. The combination therapy exerted a significant antitumor effect versus radiotherapy alone in both xenograft models. Combination of OBP-301 with radiotherapy exerts a synergistic effect and may represent a promising treatment for radioresistant oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical utility of recombinant adenoviral human p53 gene therapy: current perspectives

Gene therapy has promised to be a highly effective antitumor treatment by introducing a tumor suppressor gene or the abrogation of an oncogene. Among the potential therapeutic transgenes, the tumor suppressor gene p53 serves as an attractive target. Restoration of wild-type p53 function in tumors can be achieved by introduction of an intact complementary deoxyribonucleic acid copy of the p53 gene using a suitable viral vector, in most cases an adenoviral vector (Adp53). Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that Adp53 triggers a dramatic tumor regression response in various cancers. These viruses are engineered to lack certain early proteins and are thus replication defective, including Gendicine, SCH-58500, and Advexin. Several types of tumor-specific p53-expressing conditionally replicating adenovirus vectors (known as replication-competent CRAdp53 vectors) have been developed, such as ONYX 015, AdDelta24-p53, SG600-p53, OBP-702, and H101. Various clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the safety and efficiency of these adenoviral vectors. In this review we will talk about the biological mechanisms, clinical utility, and therapeutic potentials of the replication-deficient Adp53-based and replication-competent CRAdp53-based gene therapy.

Antitumor effects of telomerase-specific replication-selective oncolytic viruses for adenoid cystic carcinoma cell lines

We evaluated the antitumor effect of a telomerase-specific replication-selective adenovirus (Telomelysin, OBP-301) for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in vitro and in vivo. Adenovirus E1 gene expression was controlled by human telomerase reverse transcription (hTERT). Infection of ACC cells by OBP-301 induced high E1A mRNA expression and subsequent oncolytic cell death in a dose-dependent manner. Using OBP-401 (TelomeScan), a genetically engineered adenovirus that carries the GFP gene under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter at the deleted E3 region of OBP-301, ACC cells expressed bright GFP fluorescence as early as 12 h after OBP-401 infection. The fluorescence intensity gradually increased in a time-dependent manner, followed by rapid cell death due to the cytopathic effect of OBP-401, as evidenced by the floating, highly light-refractive cells using phase-contrast microscopy. Effects of intratumorally injected OBP-401 against established Acc2 xenograft tumors were seen in BALB/c nu/nu mice. The levels of GFP expression following ex vivo infection of OBP-401 may be of value as a positive predictive marker for the outcome of telomerase-specific virotherapy. Our data clearly indicated that telomerase-specific oncolytic adenoviruses have significant therapeutic potential against human ACC in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that treatment with OBP-301 and OBP-401 may improve the quality of life of oral cancer patients.

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor pelitinib regulates radiation-induced p65-dependent telomerase activation in squamous cell carcinoma

Our earlier studies indicated that ionizing radiation (IR) induces NF-κB-dependent clonal expansion of therapy resistant tumor cells. Herein, we investigated whether mitigation of NF-κB-dependent telomerase activation by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor can enhance IR-induced celling killing. SCC-4 and SCC-9 cells exposed to IR with or without Pelitinib were examined for NF-κB and hTERT transcription using luciferase reporter assays. NF-κB-dependent hTERT transcription was confirmed by either muting NF-κB or by using hTERT constructs lacking NF-κB binding sites. hTERT, mRNA, telomerase activity and cell survival of tumor cells were analyzed using QPCR, TRAP and clonogenic assay, respectively. Pelitinib inhibited IR-induced NF-κB, telomerase activity and hTERT transactivation. Ionizing radiation-induced telomerase activity is regulated at the transcriptional level by triggering TERT promoter activation. Functional NF-κB mediates telomerase activity by binding to the κB binding region in the promoter region of TERT. Elimination of the NF-κB recognition site on telomerase or muting NF-κB compromises IR-induced telomerase promoter activation. We found that Pelitinib inhibited IR-induced TERT transcription, transactivation and telomerase activation in IR-exposed and NF-κB-overexpressed cells. Furthermore, Pelitinib potentiates IR-induced cell killing. Our results strongly suggest that IR-induced NF-κB-mediated cell survival is supported by telomerase activation. We propose that if this pathway can be inhibited with Pelitinib treatment, one could further enhance therapeutic outcome in squamous cell carcinoma.

Examination of the optimal condition on the in vitro sensitivity to telomelysin in head and neck cancer cell lines

OBJECTIVE

Telomelysin (OBP-301) is a telomerase-specific replication-competent adenovirus with a human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter. Telomelysin has a strong antitumor effect on a variety of cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and combining telomelysin treatment with paclitaxel or cisplatin enhances the antitumor effect on HNSCC. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the antitumor activity of telomelysin and tumor cell doubling time(DT), S-phase fraction, and E1A expression. We also investigated whether the antitumor effects of OBP-301-resistant tumor cells are enhanced by cisplatin, paclitaxel, or streptolysin O.

METHODS

The tumor cell DT of 17 human HNSCC cell lines was examined. Antitumor activities of telomelysin (OBP-301) for each HNSCC cell line were examined by MTT assay. Cell cycle analysis was conducted by flowcytometry. E1A gene expressions after infection with telomelysin, hTERT, CAR (Cocksackie Adenovirus Receptor), and c-Myc were examined by quantitative PCR, and E1A expressions were examined again after pretreatment with cisplatin, paclitaxel, or streptolysin O. Correlations were analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between telomelysin sensitivity and DT, S-phase fraction and early E1A expression, and pretreatment with cisplatin, paclitaxel, and streptolysin O increased infectivity of telomelysin-resistant HNSCC cell lines.

CONCLUSION

These findings are useful for advancing clinical trials, and suggest that adjuvant telomelysin treatment would be effective even in telomelysin-resistant HNSCC cell lines.

Oncolytic Viruses for Cancer Therapy: Overcoming the Obstacles

Targeted therapy of cancer using oncolytic viruses has generated much interest over the past few years in the light of the limited efficacy and side effects of standard cancer therapeutics for advanced disease. In 2006, the world witnessed the first government-approved oncolytic virus for the treatment of head and neck cancer. It has been known for many years that viruses have the ability to replicate in and lyse cancer cells. Although encouraging results have been demonstrated in vitro and in animal models, most oncolytic viruses have failed to impress in the clinical setting. The explanation is multifactorial, determined by the complex interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment, the virus, and the host immune response. This review focuses on discussion of the obstacles that oncolytic virotherapy faces and recent advances made to overcome them, with particular reference to adenoviruses.