HER2-Overexpressing Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Increased Risk of Ipsilateral Invasive Recurrence, Receptor Discordance with Recurrence

Systematic assessment of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a perspective on the potential clinical relevance

In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.

Critical Roles of SRC-3 in the Development and Progression of Breast Cancer, Rendering It a Prospective Clinical Target

Breast cancer (BCa) is the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumor in women and is also one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Most breast tumors are hormone-dependent and estrogen signaling plays a critical role in promoting the survival and malignant behaviors of these cells. Estrogen signaling involves ligand-activated cytoplasmic estrogen receptors that translocate to the nucleus with various co-regulators, such as steroid receptor co-activator (SRC) family members, and bind to the promoters of target genes and regulate their expression. SRC-3 is a member of this family that interacts with, and enhances, the transcriptional activity of the ligand activated estrogen receptor. Although SRC-3 has important roles in normal homeostasis and developmental processes, it has been shown to be amplified and overexpressed in breast cancer and to promote malignancy. The malignancy-promoting potential of SRC-3 is diverse and involves both promoting malignant behavior of tumor cells and creating a tumor microenvironment that has an immunosuppressive phenotype. SRC-3 also inhibits the recruitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with effector function and promotes stemness. Furthermore, SRC-3 is also involved in the development of resistance to hormone therapy and immunotherapy during breast cancer treatment. The versatility of SRC-3 in promoting breast cancer malignancy in this way makes it a good target, and methodical targeting of SRC-3 probably will be important for the success of breast cancer treatment.

Phase II Trial of Nelipepimut-S Peptide Vaccine in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

NeuVax is a vaccine comprised of the HER2-derived MHC class I peptide E75 (nelipepimut-S, NPS) combined with GM-CSF. We completed a randomized trial of preoperative vaccination with NeuVax versus GM-CSF alone in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The primary objective was to evaluate for NPS-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive DCIS were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to NeuVax versus GM-CSF alone and received two inoculations prior to surgery. The number of NPS-specific CTL was measured pre-vaccination, at surgery, and 1 and 3 to 6 months post-operation by dextramer assay. Differences in CTL responses between groups and between pre-vaccination and 1-month post-operation were analyzed using a two-sample t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The incidence and severity of adverse events were compared between groups. Overall, 45 patients were registered; 20 patients were HLA-A2 negative, 7 declined participation, 1 withdrew, and 4 failed screening for other reasons. The remaining 13 were randomized to NeuVax (n = 9) or GM-CSF alone (n = 4). Vaccination was well-tolerated with similar treatment-related toxicity between groups with the majority (>89%) of adverse events being grade 1. The percentage of NPS-specific CTLs increased in both arms between baseline (pre-vaccination) and 1-month post-operation. The increase was numerically greater in the NPS+GM-CSF arm, but the difference was not statistically significant. NPS+GM-CSF is safe and well-tolerated when given preoperatively to patients with DCIS. In patients with HLA-A2-positive DCIS, two inoculations with NPS+GM-CSF can induce in vivo immunity and a continued antigen-specific T-cell response 1-month postsurgery.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

This trial showed that vaccination of patients with HLA-A2-positive DCIS with NeuVax in the preoperative setting can induce a sustained antigen-specific T-cell response. This provides proof of principle that vaccination in the preoperative or adjuvant setting may stimulate an adaptive immune response that could potentially prevent disease recurrence.

Risk factors for breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis differ from those for invasive recurrence

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ is rare, making it difficult to predict which patients are at risk and to identify whether risk factors for this outcome are the same as those for invasive recurrence. We aimed to identify whether risk factors for invasive recurrences are similar to those for breast cancer death after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for female patients diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Cumulative incidence was estimated by treatment group using competing risks. Competing risks regression was then performed for the development of in-breast invasive recurrence with competing risks of breast and non-breast cancer death. Competing risks regression was then again performed for development of breast cancer mortality with the competing risk of non-breast cancer death.

RESULTS

A total of 29,515 patients were identified. Of them, 164 patients suffered breast cancer mortality without an intervening invasive recurrence, and 44 suffered breast cancer mortality after an invasive in-breast recurrence. On competing risks analysis for invasive in-breast recurrence, significant factors included lesion size >5 cm (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.04, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 0.0005, 95% confidence interval 0.0003-0.0007, P < .001), other race (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.52, P = .002), Black race (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.46, P = .04), age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 0.99, confidence interval 0.98-1.00, P = .02), low-grade disease (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.96, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.77, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.44, P < .001). Significant factors for breast cancer mortality included age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.05, P < .001), Black race (hazard ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval 2.08-3.99, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 6.02, 95% confidence interval 1.39-26.07, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.72, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.92, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that risk factors for in-breast invasive recurrence after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ differ from risk factors for breast cancer mortality and development of metastatic recurrence. In-breast invasive recurrence is not the only consideration for breast cancer specific mortality in ductal carcinoma in situ patients.

Accurate genome-wide genotyping from archival tissue to explore the contribution of common genetic variants to pre-cancer outcomes

PURPOSE

The contribution of common genetic variants to pre-cancer progression is understudied due to long follow-up time, rarity of poor outcomes and lack of available germline DNA collection. Alternatively, DNA from diagnostic archival tissue is available, but its somatic nature, limited quantity and suboptimal quality would require an accurate cost-effective genome-wide germline genotyping methodology.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Blood and tissue DNA from 10 individuals were used to benchmark the accuracy of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) genotypes, Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) or HLA haplotypes using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lc-WGS) and genotype imputation. Tissue-derived PRS were further evaluated for 36 breast cancer patients (11.7 years median follow-up time) diagnosed with DCIS and used to model the risk of Breast Cancer Subsequent Events (BCSE).

RESULTS

Tissue-derived germline DNA profiling resulted in accurate genotypes at common SNPs (blood correlation r2 > 0.94) and across 22 disease-related polygenic risk scores (PRS, mean correlation r = 0.93). Imputed Class I and II HLA haplotypes were 96.7% and 82.5% concordant with clinical-grade blood HLA haplotypes, respectively. In DCIS patients, tissue-derived PRS was significantly associated with BCSE (HR = 2, 95% CI 1.2-3.8). The top and bottom decile patients had an estimated 28% and 5% chance of BCSE at 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Archival tissue DNA germline profiling using lc-WGS and imputation, represents a cost and resource-effective alternative in the retrospective design of long-term disease genetic studies. Initial results in breast cancer suggest that common risk variants contribute to pre-cancer progression.

The clinical significance of HER2 expression in DCIS

HER2 is an established prognostic and predictive marker for patients with invasive breast cancer. The clinical and biological significance of HER2 overexpression in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains poorly defined. DCIS is a heterogeneous disease and some patients with DCIS will not progress to invasive breast cancer. However, clinically significant recurrence rates have been reported after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS and approximately half of these cases will be life-threatening invasive recurrences. Since the incidence of DCIS is rising due to the widespread use of screening mammography, there is robust interest in selecting high-risk DCIS patients that may benefit from adjuvant therapies. Molecular prognostic and predictive models in early invasive breast cancer help clinicians identify patients that will benefit from chemotherapy. Molecular subtyping and profiling could also be useful in treating DCIS patients. According to current practice guidelines, HER2 testing is not recommended in DCIS patients. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that HER2-positive DCIS cases may be associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters and increased recurrence rates. This review summarizes the existing body of evidence linking HER2 expression and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in DCIS. HER2, as well as its correlation with other clinicopathological markers might be a useful prognostic and predictive marker, helping clinical decision-making in DCIS patients.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Analysis of Chinese Population of 617 Patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinicopathological characteristics of breast DCIS in Chinese women and compare with that of patients in western countries.

METHOD

From December 2005 to December 2015, 617 women diagnosed with pure DCIS after surgery at our institution were enrolled, and the clinicopathological characteristics were described.

RESULTS

In this study, the percentage of patients detected on screening, diagnosed at ≤50 years of age, with tumor size ≤2.0 cm, and with low-intermediate grade was 39.4%, 56.7%, 72.6%, and 77.4%, respectively, as compared to 50-80%, 20-30%, 70-90%, and 40-60% in published reports from western countries. The percentage of ER-positive patients was 76.3% in this study, which is similar to the mean expression rate of ER (mean: 68.7%, range: 49-96.6%) reported previously.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinicopathological characteristics of Chinese DCIS patients include less detection on screening, younger age at diagnosis, and more low-intermediate nuclear grade.