A 12-year-old girl with hemolytic uremic syndrome as initial symptom of systemic lupus erythematosus and a literature review

Systemic lupus erythematosus presenting with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can present with a diverse array of hematologic manifestations, among which atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare entity. SLE-triggered aHUS has significant morbidity and mortality without timely intervention, yet its frequency remains uncertain and optimal strategies for complement-directed therapies are largely expert-driven. We performed a comprehensive literature review and present a case of a 23-year-old female newly diagnosed with SLE/class IV lupus nephritis who developed aHUS that rapidly responded to the C5 antagonist, eculizumab. Review of the current literature identified forty-nine published cases of SLE with concurrent aHUS and revealed a predilection for aHUS in younger SLE patients, concurrent presentation with lupus nephritis, anti-dsDNA positivity, and complement system abnormalities. Over seventy percent of cases used eculizumab as complement-directed therapy with a trend towards faster time to improvement in laboratory parameters, though reported outcomes were highly variable. Early recognition of aHUS in SLE is pivotal in guiding appropriate therapeutic interventions, and prompt initiation of eculizumab may reduce the potential morbidity associated with plasmapheresis and additional immunosuppression. While eculizumab showcases promising results, its optimal timing and duration remain elusive. An understanding of a patients' complement genetics could aid management strategies, and ongoing research into complement-targeted therapies offers promising avenues for both SLE and aHUS treatment.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and complement blockade: established and emerging uses of complement inhibition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a diagnosis that has captured the interest of specialists across multiple fields. The hallmark features of aHUS are microangiopathic hemolysis and thrombocytopenia, which creates a diagnostic dilemma because of the occurrence of these findings in a wide variety of clinical disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

In most of the instances, aHUS is a diagnosis of exclusion after ruling out causes such as Shigella toxin, acquired or genetic a disintegrin and metalloproteinase thrombospondin motif 13 deficiency (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura), and vitamin B12 deficiency. In the purest sense, aHUS is a genetic condition that is activated (or unmasked) by an environmental exposure. However, it is now evident that complement activation is a feature of many diseases. Variants in complement regulatory genes predispose to microangiopathic hemolysis in many rheumatologic, oncologic, and drug-induced vascular, obstetric, peritransplant, and infectious syndromes.

SUMMARY

Many 'hemolysis syndromes' overlap clinically with aHUS, and we review the literature on the treatment of these conditions with complement inhibition. New reports on the treatment of C3 glomerulopathy, Shiga toxin-related classic hemolytic uremic syndrome, and medication-related thrombotic microangiopathy will be reviewed as well.

A case of patient with renal lupus with an initial presentation of hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by streptococcal infection

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease that is presented in a myriad of ways. Renal involvement is common in SLE and usually presents clinically as glomerulonephritis. We describe patients with SLE presented initially with hemolytic uremic syndrome which is a distinctive initial presentation.

Plasmapheresis Is Associated With Better Renal Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis Patients With Thrombotic Microangiopathy: A Case Series Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of plasmapheresis in patients with lupus nephritis-combined thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in a Chinese cohort.Clinical and therapeutic data of patients with lupus nephritis-combined TMA were collected retrospectively. A comparison between those with and without plasmapheresis was performed.Seventy patients with renal biopsy-proven TMA in lupus nephritis were treated with conventional combined corticosteroid and immunosuppressive agents as induction therapy, 9 of the 70 patients received additional plasmapheresis. The plasmapheresis group presented with more severe SLE and renal activity indices, including a significant higher ratio of neurologic disorder (P = 0.025), lower level of platelet count (P = 0.009), higher value of serum creatinine (P = 0.038), higher percentage of anti-cardiolipin antibodies positive (P = 0.001), and higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index scores (P = 0.012), than that of the nonplasmapheresis group. However, the plasmapheresis group had a significant higher rate of remission and a lower ratio of treatment failure than that of the nonplasmapheresis group (P = 0.03). As the baseline data were significantly different between the 2 groups, the propensity score match was further designed to avoid retrospective bias. After re-analysis, the plasmapheresis group still had a significant higher rate of remission and a lower ratio of treatment failure than that of the nonplasmapheresis group (P = 0.018). More importantly, the plasmapheresis group had significant less composite endpoints than that of the nonplasmapheresis group (P = 0.005).Our study suggested that additional plasmapheresis on conventional induction therapy may benefit patients with lupus nephritis-combined TMA, which warrants further explorations.

Thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study in North Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) co-existing with SLE is rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the triggering factors, clinical features and outcomes of SLE patients with TMA in Northern Taiwan.

METHODS

Twenty-five TMA cases out of 2461 SLE patients admitted to Taipei Veterans General Hospital, between 2000 and 2010, were enrolled.

RESULTS

When TMA occurred, 16 (64.0%) patients had infection; 22 (88.0%) were in an active disease state with a SLEDAI score >10. Among the infection group, 13 (81.3%) had an increase in the SLEDAI score of ≥ 4. We found that older age (≥ 50 years), low platelets (≤ 20,000/nm(3)), presence of infection, acute renal failure (ARF) or four or more TMA features were independent risk factors for persistent haematological abnormalities (P < 0.05); older age (≥ 50 years) and a high reticulocyte index (>2%) were the risk factors for persistent renal function impairment (P < 0.05). The overall mortality rate was 52.0% (13 out of 25); older age (≥ 40 years), low complement value, presence of infection (P < 0.001), two or more infection sources, ARF and four or more TMA features were the statistically significant factors contributing to a higher mortality rate. Patients receiving plasma exchange seven times or more had a significantly higher rate of improvement in renal function and haematological abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that infection was one of the major triggers for the flare-up of SLE disease activity and occurrence of TMA in SLE. Infection is also a strong risk factor for outcome in SLE patients with TMA. Plasma exchange can be considered as an adjuvant treatment modality.

Prognostic impact of atypical presentation in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to assess the rate of atypical manifestations at onset in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate their effect on disease outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. A manifestation was considered atypical if it was not included in the American College Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE but was reported in literature as associated with SLE. Unfavorable outcome was considered presence of organ damage in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index at the last available evaluation.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were enrolled in the study; 24% presented atypical clinical features at onset. Univariate analysis showed a significant association of worse outcome variables with the presence of atypical manifestations at onset (P = .004), as well as renal involvement (P = .027). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that atypical manifestations at onset (P = .018), renal involvement at onset or during follow up (P = .024), and central nervous system disease involvement during follow up (P = .021) were independent predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a relatively high rate of atypical onset in pediatric SLE. Presence of atypical manifestations at presentation and early kidney disease correlate with poor outcome. Similarly, during follow-up, kidney and central nervous system diseases are associated with worse outcome.

Clinical-pathological features and prognosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the clinical-pathological features and the prognosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical-pathological data and prognosis in 8 patients with LN complicating with TTP.

RESULTS

Thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia, neurologic symptoms, and renal dysfunction were the clinical manifestations in 8 patients. Six patients had fever. Eight patients presented with rapid progressive glomerulonephritis, and 1 patient with continuous gross hematuria. The histologic features of the 8 patients were thrombotic microangiopathy lesions. Immune-suppressive therapies were administrated in all patients, and blood purification therapy was applied in 7 patients. Three cases involved plasma exchange and/or immunoabsorption. Seven patients received a median follow-up of 12 months. One patient died, 3 cases received peritoneal dialysis, and 1 case failed to follow-up. During follow-up, 1 case was able to stop peritoneal dialysis, and 1 case changed to hemodialysis. The other 3 patients continued with stable renal function.

CONCLUSION

The patients with LN with TTP have severe clinical-pathological changes. Active treatment including renal replacement therapy, plasma exchange, and immunoabsorption are promising.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome: an overview

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is the most common cause of acute renal failure in children. The syndrome is defined by triad of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure (ARF). Incomplete HUS is ARF with either haemolytic anaemia or thrombocytopenia. HUS is classified into two subgroups. Typical HUS usually occurs after a prodrome of diarrhoea (D+HUS), and atypical (sporadic) HUS (aHUS), which is not associated with diarrhoea (D-HUS). The majority of D+HUS worldwide is caused by Shiga toxin-producing Esherichia coli (STEC), type O157:H7, transmitted to humans via different vehicles. Currently there are no specific therapies preventing or ameliorating the disease course. Although there are new therapeutic modalities in the horizon for D+HUS, present recommended therapy is merely symptomatic. Parenteral volume expansion may counteract the effect of thrombotic process before development of HUS and attenuate renal injury. Use of antibiotics, antimotility agents, narcotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be avoided during the acute phase. Prevention is best done by preventing primary STEC infection. Underlying aetiology in many cases of aHUS is unknown. A significant number may result from underlying infectious diseases, namely Streptococcus pneumoniae and human immunedeficiency virus. Variety of genetic forms include HUS due to deficiencies of factor H, membrane cofactor protein, Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS 13) and intracellular defect in vitamin B12 metabolism. There are cases of aHUS with autosomal recessive and dominant modes of inheritance. Drug-induced aHUS in post-transplantation is due to calcineurin-inhibitors. Systemic lupus erythematosus and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome may also present with aHUS. Therapy is directed mainly towards underlying cause.

A classification of hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related disorders

The diagnostic terms hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are based on historical and overlapping clinical descriptions. Advances in understanding some of the causes of the syndrome now permit many patients to be classified according to etiology. The increased precision of a diagnosis based on causation is important for considering logical approaches to treatment and prognosis. It is also essential for research. We propose a classification that accommodates both a current understanding of causation (level 1) and clinical association in cases for whom cause of disease is unclear (level 2). We tested the classification in a pediatric disease registry of HUS. The revised classification is a stimulus to comprehensive investigation of all cases of HUS and TTP and is expected to increase the proportion of cases in whom a level 1 etiological diagnosis is confirmed.