1
|
Stokholm JR, Vinberg M, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Kessing LV. Study protocol: group-based psychoeducation for relatives of patients with bipolar disorder-a large scale real-world randomized controlled parallel group trial, the R-bipolar RCT. Trials 2024; 25:342. [PMID: 38783322 PMCID: PMC11119791 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08172-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relatives of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) often experience emotional burden with stress and depressive symptoms that again increase the likelihood of destabilization and relapses in the patient. The effects of group-based psychoeducation have not been investigated in large-scale real-world settings. We are currently conducting a large-scale real-world randomized controlled parallel group trial (RCT) to test whether group-based psychoeducation for 200 relatives to patients with BD improves mood instability and other critical outcomes in relatives and the corresponding patients with BD. METHODS The trial is designed as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized trial with a balanced randomization 1:1 to either group-based psychoeducation or a waiting list for approximately 4 months and subsequent group-based psychoeducation. The primary outcome measure is mood instability calculated based on daily smartphone-based mood self-assessments. Other relevant outcomes are measured, including patients' reported outcomes, assessing self-assessed burden, self-efficacy, and knowledge about BD. DISCUSSION This protocol describes our currently ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims at investigating group-based psychoeducation as an intervention for relatives of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD). The study is the first large-scale real-world RCT to focus on a relatively short intervention of psychoeducation (6 sessions of 2 h each) in a large group of relatives (approximately 30 participants per group). With this focus, we wish to test an intervention that is feasible to implement in real-life psychiatric settings with limited budgets and time. It is also the first study to use mood instability in relatives as the primary outcome measure and to investigate whether mood instability and other affective symptoms in patients and relatives covary. It could be considered as limitations, that the trial is not blinded and does not include long-term follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06176001. Registered on 2023-12-19. The study is approved by the data agency (P-2021-809). The project was allowed to be initiated without permission from the Scientific Ethical Committees for the Capital Region, because it according to section 1, paragraph 4 of the Committee Act was not defined as a health scientific intervention study (case number 21063013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ravneberg Stokholm
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, The Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Maj Vinberg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Early Multimodular Prevention and Intervention Research Institution (EMPIRI), Mental Health Centre Northern Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, The Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Vedel Kessing
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, The Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lespine LF, de Martène B, Zeltner B, Chenu B, Berbey CD, Rey R. Leo program, a short multi-family skill-based psychoeducational program for caregivers of relatives living with a severe mental disorder: a retrospective pilot study. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1374540. [PMID: 38784162 PMCID: PMC11112345 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1374540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Caring for a relative with a severe mental disorder (SMD) is associated with high levels of burden and poor physical and mental health. There is a dire need for family psychoeducational programs that can be provided as early as possible. This manuscript describes the pilot testing of "Leo" a motivational-based psychoeducational program for caregivers of individuals with a SMD. The Leo program aims to provide caregivers with skills to best support their relative and to adopt self-care behaviors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed medical records of caregivers who enrolled in a short, multi-family, skill-based psychoeducational program, consisting of eight 3-hour sessions over 8 weeks. Outcomes of interest included: i) adherence to the program, ii) satisfaction and perceived usefulness, and iii) pre-post changes in self-reported levels of depression (CES-D), burden (ZBI), and skills (10 Likert-scaled items). A network analysis was used to investigate the relationships between pre-post changes in self-evaluated skills and pre-post changes in burden and depression levels. Results Over the 91 enrolled participants, 87 (95.6%) completed the program attending at least 5/8 sessions, 80.5% attending all sessions. Seventy-six caregivers fulfilled the questionnaires at baseline and after the program, and were included in the analysis. Although there was no evidence for significant change in self-reported depression levels (Cohen's d=0.19, p=0.210), burden scores and all evaluated skills were improved post-intervention, with medium to strong effect size (Cohen's ds from 0.47 to 0.87; p<0.001). Network output indicated that increased self-evaluated competence in 5 skills were associated with a global improvement in caregivers' burden and/or depression scores. Post-intervention, 89.7% of caregivers were "very satisfied" and 82.1% found the program "extremely useful". Conclusion This pilot retrospective study shows high levels of satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and adherence to "Leo", a short, multi-family, skill-based psychoeducational program with promising results in improving caregivers' burden, self-evaluated competence in coping with caregiving demands and in self-care behaviors. This study provides preliminary insights into the mechanisms by which family psychoeducation might alleviate burden of care. A larger-scaled, controlled, randomized study with follow-up assessments is warranted to determine how burden, depression, and skills, as well as their inter-relationships, evolve over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Ferdinand Lespine
- Center for Caregivers in Psychiatry of Lyon, Le Vinatier Hospital, Bron, France
- Division for Clinical Research and Innovation, Le Vinatier Hospital, Bron, France
| | | | - Blandine Zeltner
- School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France
| | | | | | - Romain Rey
- Center for Caregivers in Psychiatry of Lyon, Le Vinatier Hospital, Bron, France
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France
- University Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center U1028 UMR5292, PSYR2, Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sampogna G, Brohan E, Luciano M, Chowdhary N, Fiorillo A. Psychosocial interventions for carers of people with severe mental and substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry 2023; 66:e98. [PMID: 37997647 PMCID: PMC10755580 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental disorders - such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and substance use disorders - exert a negative impact not only on affected people but also on their carers. To support carers of people with severe mental disorders, several psychosocial interventions have been developed. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether psychosocial interventions for carers of persons with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or substance use disorders produce benefit/harm with respect to a series of outcomes - including subjective and objective burden, depressive symptoms, well-being/quality of life, sleep, skills/knowledge, self-efficacy, physical health - as compared to standard support/support as usual or other control conditions. RESULTS In carers of persons with schizophrenia, psychoeducational interventions were associated with significant improvement in personal burden, well-being, and knowledge about the illness; and a supportive-educational intervention with an improvement in personal burden. In carers of persons with bipolar disorder, psychoeducational interventions were associated with significant improvement in personal burden and depressive symptoms; family-led supportive interventions with an improvement in family burden; family-focused intervention and online "mi.spot" intervention with a significant reduction in depressive symptoms. Psychosocial interventions used for carers of persons with substance use disorders were found to be overall effective on the level of well-being, but the low number of trials did not allow detection of differences between the various psychosocial interventions. CONCLUSIONS The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate, suggesting the need for further better-quality research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Sampogna
- Department of Mental Health, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training, Naples, Italy
| | - Elaine Brohan
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mario Luciano
- Department of Mental Health, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training, Naples, Italy
| | - Neerja Chowdhary
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Fiorillo
- Department of Mental Health, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siegel-Ramsay JE, Sharp SJ, Ulack CJ, Chiang KS, Lanza di Scalea T, O'Hara S, Carberry K, Strakowski SM, Suarez J, Teisberg E, Wallace S, Almeida JRC. Experiences that matter in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study using the capability, comfort and calm framework. Int J Bipolar Disord 2023; 11:13. [PMID: 37079153 PMCID: PMC10119352 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-023-00293-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When assessing the value of an intervention in bipolar disorder, researchers and clinicians often focus on metrics that quantify improvements to core diagnostic symptoms (e.g., mania). Providers often overlook or misunderstand the impact of treatment on life quality and function. We wanted to better characterize the shared experiences and obstacles of bipolar disorder within the United States from the patient's perspective. METHODS We recruited 24 individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder and six caretakers supporting someone with the condition. Participants were involved in treatment or support services for bipolar disorder in central Texas. As part of this qualitative study, participants discussed their everyday successes and obstacles related to living with bipolar disorder during personalized, open-ended interviews. Audio files were transcribed, and Nvivo software processed an initial thematic analysis. We then categorized themes into bipolar disorder-related obstacles that limit the patient's capability (i.e., function), comfort (i.e., relief from suffering) and calm (i.e., life disruption) (Liu et al., FebClin Orthop 475:315-317, 2017; Teisberg et al., MayAcad Med 95:682-685, 2020). We then discuss themes and suggest practical strategies that might improve the value of care for patients and their families. RESULTS Issues regarding capability included the struggle to maintain identity, disruptions to meaningful employment, relationship loss and the unpredictable nature of bipolar disorder. Comfort related themes included the personal perception of diagnosis, social stigma and medication issues. Calm themes included managing dismissive doctors, finding the right psychotherapist and navigating financial burdens. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative data from patients with bipolar disorder helps identify gaps in care or practical limitations to treatment. When we listen to these individuals, it is clear that treatments must also address the unmet psychosocial impacts of the condition to improve patient care, capability and calm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Siegel-Ramsay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - S J Sharp
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - C J Ulack
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - K S Chiang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - T Lanza di Scalea
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - S O'Hara
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - K Carberry
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - S M Strakowski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - J Suarez
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- The City University of New York School of Labor and Urban Studies, New York, NY, USA
| | - E Teisberg
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Dell Medical School and McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
| | - S Wallace
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Dell Medical School and McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
| | - J R C Almeida
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Psychoeducational groups for close relatives of patients with borderline personality disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2022:10.1007/s00406-022-01395-8. [PMID: 35294615 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01395-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Psychoeducational groups for family members of patients with schizophrenia have proven to be effective. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) implies serious impairment in interpersonal relationships. Close relatives of individuals with BPD also show high levels of burden and need support. Psychoeducational groups could help to cope with the interactional problems in a relationship with a person with BPD. A manualised psychoeducational programme of 10 group sessions for close relatives of patients with BPD was tested. Measures administered at pretest and after 10 sessions were: perceived burden (IEQ-EU), knowledge about the disorder (WFBBPS-A) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF). For formative evaluation, a "Group Therapy Session Questionnaire" (participant and therapist version; GTS-A, GTS-T) was used. A total of 33 persons in three groups took part. Pre-post evaluations revealed a significantly lower level of burden and a significantly better knowledge about the disorder after participating in the psychoeducational group. Reduction of burden correlated significantly with the assessment of patients' symptom severity and carers' level of burden at study entry. There was no change in the quality of life. The participants and therapists generally rated the psychoeducational sessions very positively. The highest ratings were found in the sessions about communication skills and coping with crises. Findings indicate that the psychoeducational programme is well accepted and supportive for persons with close relationships to patients with BPD.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hansen NH, Bjerrekær L, Pallesen KJ, Juul L, Fjorback LO. The effect of mental health interventions on psychological distress for informal caregivers of people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:949066. [PMID: 36276315 PMCID: PMC9583525 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.949066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Informal caregivers of people with a mental illness are at increased risk of developing depression, anxiety, and stress, so preventive interventions are needed. METHOD The review was reported in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018094454). The PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched in June 2019. The Cochrane Risk of Bias and Jadad scale scores were used to assess study quality. Inclusion criteria were: RCTs of informal caregiver interventions regardless of the care receiver's mental illness and intervention modality. Interventions should be compared to a waitlist, treatment as usual or active control, taught in real-time by a mental health professional, include an outcome measure on psychological distress, and published in a peer-reviewed journal article in English. RCTs were excluded if the intervention was given in dyads (caregiver + care receiver), limited to the provision of respite care where the patient sample included a mix of both physical and psychological illnesses, unpublished, not peer-reviewed, study protocols, or dissertations. RESULTS A total of 2,148 studies were identified; of these, 44 RCT studies met the inclusion criteria, and 31 had sufficient data to conduct a meta-analysis including subgroup analysis (N = 1,899). The systematic review showed that thirty-one out of the 44 RCTs had an effect of the intervention on decreasing psychological distress. The results of the meta-analysis, which included informal caregiver interventions, compared to waitlist, treatment as usual, or active control, regardless of care-receiver mental illness or intervention modality showed a small effect of -0.32 (95% CI -0.53 to -0.11). The heterogeneity of the included studies was high (I 2 = 78). The subgroup analysis included manualized interventions lasting at least 8 weeks and the subgroup analysis that included an active control showed a small effect and low heterogeneity. Lack of active control and long-term follow-up is a limitation of most of the studies. CONCLUSION The evidence supports that several interventions improve the mental health of caregivers. Manualized interventions ≥ 8 weeks with active participation are most effective. Future RCTs should improve methodology, and research should investigate which intervention modality is most effective for what kind of caregiver. Future research should clearly specify what the included intervention components are, use longer follow-up times, and conduct mediational analyses to better understand what mechanisms create the effect of an intervention. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Identifier: CRD42018094454.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanja Holland Hansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lasse Bjerrekær
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karen Johanne Pallesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lise Juul
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Overby Fjorback
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rabelo JL, Cruz BF, Ferreira JDR, Viana BDM, Barbosa IG. Psychoeducation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review. World J Psychiatry 2021; 11:1407-1424. [PMID: 35070785 PMCID: PMC8717031 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder characterized by mood swings. Psychosocial interventions, such as psychoeducation, play an essential role in promoting social rehabilitation and improving pharmacological treatment.
AIM To investigate the role of psychoeducation in BD.
METHODS A systematic review of original studies regarding psychoeducation interventions in patients with BD and their relatives was developed. A systematic literature search was performed using the Medline, Scopus, and Lilacs databases. No review articles or qualitative studies were included in the analysis. There were no date restriction criteria, and studies published up to April 2021 were included.
RESULTS A total of forty-seven studies were selected for this review. Thirty-eight studies included patients, and nine included family members. Psychoeducation of patients and family members was associated with a lower number of new mood episodes and a reduction in number and length of stay of hospitalizations. Psychoeducational interventions with patients are associated with improved adherence to drug treatment. The strategies studied in patients and family members do not interfere with the severity of symptoms of mania or depression or with the patient's quality of life or functionality. Psychoeducational interventions with family members do not alter patients' adherence to pharmacotherapy.
CONCLUSION Psychoeducation as an adjunct strategy to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of BD leads to a reduction in the frequency of new mood episodes, length of hospital stay and adherence to drug therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Lemos Rabelo
- Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Medical Investigation–School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Programa de Extensão em Psiquiatria e Psicologia de Idosos, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Breno Fiuza Cruz
- Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Medical Investigation–School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Programa de Extensão em Psiquiatria e Psicologia de Idosos, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Department of Mental Health, School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - Bernardo de Mattos Viana
- Programa de Extensão em Psiquiatria e Psicologia de Idosos, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Department of Mental Health, School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Izabela Guimarães Barbosa
- Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Medical Investigation–School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Programa de Extensão em Psiquiatria e Psicologia de Idosos, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Department of Mental Health, School of Medicine, UFMG, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Casarez RL, Soares JC, Meyer TD. Psychoeducation for caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder-Lessons learned from a feasibility study. J Affect Disord 2021; 287:367-371. [PMID: 33836364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and potential efficacy of a 7-week psychoeducation intervention implemented in a group setting. The intervention was based on Miklowitz's (2008) psychoeducation component of Family-Focused Therapy. METHOD This was a feasibility randomized controlled trial study using a 2-group design (intervention and wait-list control). Twelve adult family members of those with bipolar disorder were randomized to receive 7 psychoeducation sessions immediately or after a 7-week waiting period. Outcomes were caregiver burden, depression, mental-well being, health status, and cortisol and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Frequencies and percentages were used to calculate feasibility measures. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to assess change over time during treatment. RESULTS Twelve participants were recruited out of a projected sample size of 40. Feasibility rates included the following: 85% retention rate, 100% data collection rate, 94% attendance rate. The mean satisfaction score was 17.25, with potential scores of 4-20. There were trends in improvement in some of the variables (caregiver burden, mental well-being, IL-6) from pre-to post-intervention. LIMITATION The study lacked a sufficient sample size. CONCLUSION Although some feasibility results were positive and the participants were satisfied with the intervention, recruitment was challenging. The study setting was near downtown in a sprawling urban area. Also, potential participants often assume multiple role responsibilities. They often lacked the time to physically attend the sessions. Future studies could incorporate teleconference or virtual environment platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Casarez
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Jair C Soares
- McGovern Medical School, Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Thomas D Meyer
- McGovern Medical School, Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Valls È, Bonnín CM, Torres I, Brat M, Prime-Tous M, Morilla I, Segú X, Solé B, Torrent C, Vieta E, Martínez-Arán A, Reinares M, Sánchez-Moreno J. Efficacy of an integrative approach for bipolar disorder: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med 2021; 52:1-12. [PMID: 33858527 PMCID: PMC9811269 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721001057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) represents one of the most therapeutically complex psychiatric disorders. The development of a feasible comprehensive psychological approach to complement pharmacotherapy to improve its clinical management is required. The main objective of the present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to test the efficacy of a novel adjunctive treatment entitled integrative approach in patients with BD, including: psychoeducation, mindfulness training, and functional remediation. METHODS This is a parallel two-armed, rater-blind RCT of an integrative approach plus treatment as usual (TAU), v. TAU alone. Participants were recruited at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and randomized to one of the two conditions. They were assessed at baseline and after finishing the intervention. The main outcome variable included changes in psychosocial functioning assessed through the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). RESULTS After finishing the treatment, the repeated-measures analyses revealed a significant group × time interaction in favor of the patients who received the integrative approach (n = 28) compared to the TAU group (n = 37) (Pillai's trace = 0.10; F(1,57) = 6.9; p = 0.01), improving the functional outcome. Significant effects were also found in two out of the six domains of the FAST, including the cognitive domain (Pillai's trace = 0.25; F(1,57) = 19.1; p < 0.001) and leisure time (Pillai's trace = 0.11; F(1,57) = 7.15; p = 0.01). Regarding the secondary outcomes, a significant group × time interaction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale changes was detected (Pillai's trace = 0.08; F(1,62) = 5.6; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION This preliminary study suggests that the integrative approach represents a promising cost-effective therapy to improve psychosocial functioning and residual depressive symptoms in patients suffering from BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Èlia Valls
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - C. Mar Bonnín
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Imma Torres
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mercè Brat
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mireia Prime-Tous
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ivette Morilla
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Xavier Segú
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Brisa Solé
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Carla Torrent
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Anabel Martínez-Arán
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - María Reinares
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - José Sánchez-Moreno
- Barcelona Bipolar Disorders and Depressive Unit, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hansen NH, Juul L, Pallesen KJ, Fjorback LO. Effect of a Compassion Cultivation Training Program for Caregivers of People With Mental Illness in Denmark: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e211020. [PMID: 33683334 PMCID: PMC7941195 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Caregivers of people with mental illness are at increased risk of developing depression, anxiety, and stress. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of a compassion cultivation training (CCT) program on decreasing caregiver psychological distress. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This waitlist-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 2 different community settings in Denmark. Caregivers were excluded if they had a diagnosed and untreated mental illness, addiction, meditation practice, or current psychotherapeutic treatment. Enrollment occurred between May 2018 and March 2019. A repeated measurement model was used to examine the impact of the intervention. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to July 7, 2020. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized 1-to-1 to an 8-week CCT course or waitlist control. Block randomization was used with 40 participants in each block. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was reduction in psychological distress, as measured by the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS). Baseline, postintervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-up measurements were collected. RESULTS Among 192 participants assessed for eligibility, 161 participants were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 52.6 [12.5] years; 142 [88.2%] women), with 79 participants randomized to the CCT intervention and 82 participants in the waitlist control group. At baseline, the mean (SD) DASS scores for the intervention vs control groups were 10.89 (8.66) vs 10.80 (8.38) for depression, 6.89 (6.48) vs 6.68 (5.33) for anxiety, and 14.96 (7.90) vs 15.77 (7.40) for stress. The CCT group experienced statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome in mean change from baseline vs the control group at postintervention (adjusted mean difference: depression, -4.16 [95% CI, -6.75 to -1.58]; P = .002; anxiety, -2.24 [95% CI, -3.99 to -0.48]; P = .01; stress, -4.20 [95% CI, -6.73 to -1.67]; P = .001), the 3-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference: depression, -3.78 [95% CI, -6.40 to -1.17]; P = .005; anxiety, -2.50 [95% CI, -4.27 to -0.73]; P = .006; stress, -3.76 [95% CI, -6.32 to -1.21]; P = .004), and the 6-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference: depression: -4.24 [95% CI, -6.97 to -1.52]; P = .002; anxiety, -2.12 [95% CI, -3.96 to -0.29]; P = .02; stress: -3.79 [95% CI, -6.44 to -1.13]; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that CCT was superior to the waitlist control in supporting caregivers' mental health. Statistically and clinically significant reductions in psychological distress were found and sustained at the 6-month follow-up. The improvements noted in this randomized clinical trial could serve to encourage implementation of future evidence-based programs for caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03730155.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanja Holland Hansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lise Juul
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karen-Johanne Pallesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Overby Fjorback
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valls È, Sánchez-Moreno J, Bonnín CM, Solé B, Prime-Tous M, Torres I, Brat M, Gavin P, Morilla I, Montejo L, Jiménez E, Varo C, Torrent C, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Vieta E, Martínez-Arán A, Reinares M. Effects of an integrative approach to bipolar disorders combining psychoeducation, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and functional remediation: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL 2020; 13:165-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
12
|
McWilliams S, Egan P, Jackson D, Renwick L, Foley S, Behan C, Fitzgerald E, Fetherston A, Turner N, Kinsella A, O’Callaghan E. Caregiver psychoeducation for first-episode psychosis. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 25:33-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2009] [Revised: 08/18/2009] [Accepted: 08/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionInternational best-practice guidelines for the management of first-episode psychosis have recommended the provision of psychoeducation for multifamily groups. While there is ample evidence of their efficacy in multiepisode psychosis, there is a paucity of evidence supporting this approach specifically for first-episode psychosis. We sought to determine whether a six-week caregiver psychoeducation programme geared specifically at first-episode psychosis improves caregiver knowledge and attitudes.MethodsCaregivers of people with first-episode psychosis completed a 23-item adapted version of the self-report Family Questionnaire (KQ) and a 17-item adapted version of the self-report Drug Attitudes Inventory (DAI) before and after the six-week DETECT Information and Support Course (DISC). Using a Generalised Linear Repeated Measures Model, we analyzed the differences in proportions of correct answers before and after the programme.ResultsOver a 24-month study period, 31 caregivers (13 higher socioeconomic; 13 lower socioeconomic; five unspecified socioeconomic; 19 female; 12 male) participated in the DISC programme and completed inventories before and after the course. Knowledge of psychosis and specific knowledge of medication treatment improved among caregivers overall (p < .01; effect sizes 0.78 and 0.94 respectively). There were no significant gender or socioeconomic differences in any improvement.DiscussionThis study confirms that caregiver psychoeducation specifically for first-episode psychosis directly improves knowledge of the illness overall and, in particular, knowledge of medication. Gender is not a factor in this, while the lack of any socioeconomic differences dispels the myth that patients in lower socioeconomic groups are disadvantaged because their caregivers know less.
Collapse
|
13
|
L’éducation thérapeutique : un levier pour modifier les perceptions du trouble bipolaire chez les aidants familiaux. Encephale 2019; 45:239-244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
14
|
Casarez RL, Barlow E, Iyengar SM, Soares JC, Meyer TD. Understanding the role of m-health to improve well-being in spouses of patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2019; 250:391-396. [PMID: 30877862 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Spouses and partners of individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) experience significant burden. As there are some limitations to standard psychosocial caregiver interventions, mobile health technology (mHealth) may be a way to reduce burden and improve well-being in these caregivers. The purpose of this study was to explore how the well-being of spouses or partners of patients with BD can be improved through mHealth technology. METHODS Using a qualitative design, we conducted five focus groups and one in-depth individual interview to collect information from participants about what they would expect from such a device. The sample consists of thirteen participants (eleven spouses and two partners). The age range was 29-65, with eight females and five males. Data were collected using minimally structured interviews and independently analyzed by the authors using content analysis. RESULTS Results indicated that the mHealth device many be helpful in at least six areas: reduction of stressors, decreased social isolation, improving communication in the relationship between the spouses, speaking with children about the illness, managing medications, and providing information on resources. CONCLUSION Mobile health technology may be a feasible, available, and cost-effective support tool for spouses and partners of individuals with BD, especially in reducing caregiver stress. Future research is needed to develop the application and test its effectiveness on health outcomes in a larger trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Casarez
- Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sriram M Iyengar
- Biomedical Informatics Core, Clinical Science and Translational Research, Texas A & M University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jair C Soares
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Thomas D Meyer
- McGovern Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baruch E, Pistrang N, Barker C. Psychological interventions for caregivers of people with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2018; 236:187-198. [PMID: 29747136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Clinical guidelines recommend that psychological interventions be offered to caregivers of people with bipolar disorder. However, there is little clarity about the efficacy of such interventions. This review examined the efficacy of psychological interventions in improving caregiver-focused outcomes, including burden, psychological symptoms and knowledge. METHOD A systematic search for controlled trials was conducted using a combination of electronic database searches (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL), and hand searches. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Outcomes were meta-analysed using Review Manager (RevMan). RESULTS Nine studies met inclusion criteria. All meta-analyses compared psychoeducation to a control. At post-treatment there was a large effect of psychoeducation on burden (g = -0.8, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.27). However, there was high heterogeneity, confidence intervals were wide, and the effect was not maintained at follow-up. The apparent effect of psychoeducation on psychological symptoms was driven by a single outlying study. There was a very large effect on knowledge at post-treatment (g = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.39, 3.82) and follow-up (g = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.85, 3.98). LIMITATIONS There was considerable diversity in study methodology and quality. The number of included studies and sample sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS This review provides tentative meta-analytic evidence for the efficacy of psychoeducation in improving caregiver burden at post-treatment, and knowledge at post-treatment and follow-up. Services could consider offering psychoeducation as part of a multi-disciplinary package of care. However, more methodologically rigorous research is needed before clinical recommendations can be made with confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Baruch
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
| | - Nancy Pistrang
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Chris Barker
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Burden and Expressed Emotion in Caregivers of Bipolar Affective Disorder-Mania: A Cross-Sectional Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40737-018-0112-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
17
|
Crespo-Maraver M, Doval E, Fernández-Castro J, Giménez-Salinas J, Prat G, Bonet P. [Caregiver's health: adaption and validation in a Spanish population of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI)]. GACETA SANITARIA 2018; 33:348-355. [PMID: 29627117 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To adapt and to validate the Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI) in a Spanish population, providing empirical evidence of its internal consistency, internal structure and validity. METHOD Psychometric validation of the adapted version of the ECI. One hundred and seventy-two caregivers (69.2% women), mean age 57.51 years (range: 21-89) participated. Demographic and clinical data, standardized measures (ECI, suffering scale of SCL-90-R, Zarit burden scale) were used. The two scales of negative evaluation of the ECI most related to serious mental disorders (disruptive behaviours [DB] and negative symptoms [NS]) and the two scales of positive appreciation (positive personal experiences [PPE], and good aspects of the relationship [GAR]) were analyzed. Exploratory structural equation modelling was used to analyze the internal structure. The relationship between the ECI scales and the SCL-90-R and Zarit scores was also studied. RESULTS The four-factor model presented a good fit. Cronbach's alpha (DB: 0.873; NS: 0.825; PPE: 0.720; GAR: 0.578) showed a higher homogeneity in the negative scales. The SCL-90-R scores correlated with the negative ECI scales, and none of the ECI scales correlated with the Zarit scale. CONCLUSIONS The Spanish version of the ECI can be considered a valid, reliable, understandable and feasible self-report measure for its administration in the health and community context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariacruz Crespo-Maraver
- División de Salud Mental, Grupo SaMIS, Fundació Althaia de Manresa - Xarxa Assistencial i Universitària de Manresa, Manresa (Barcelona), España; Departamento de Psicología Básica, Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Barcelona), España.
| | - Eduardo Doval
- Departamento de Psicobiología y de Metodología en Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Barcelona), España
| | - Jordi Fernández-Castro
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Barcelona), España
| | - Jordi Giménez-Salinas
- División de Salud Mental, Grupo SaMIS, Fundació Althaia de Manresa - Xarxa Assistencial i Universitària de Manresa, Manresa (Barcelona), España
| | - Gemma Prat
- División de Salud Mental, Grupo SaMIS, Fundació Althaia de Manresa - Xarxa Assistencial i Universitària de Manresa, Manresa (Barcelona), España
| | - Pere Bonet
- División de Salud Mental, Grupo SaMIS, Fundació Althaia de Manresa - Xarxa Assistencial i Universitària de Manresa, Manresa (Barcelona), España
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kessing LV, Bauer M, Nolen WA, Severus E, Goodwin GM, Geddes J. Effectiveness of maintenance therapy of lithium vs other mood stabilizers in monotherapy and in combinations: a systematic review of evidence from observational studies. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20:419-431. [PMID: 29441712 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For the first time to present a systematic review of observational studies on the efficiency of lithium monotherapy in comparison with other maintenance mood stabilizers in monotherapy and in combination. METHODS As part of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force on Lithium Treatment, we undertook a systematic literature search of non-randomized controlled observational studies on (i) lithium monotherapy vs treatment with another maintenance mood stabilizer in monotherapy and (ii) lithium in combination with other mood stabilizers vs monotherapy. RESULTS In eight out of nine identified studies including a total of < 14 000 patients, maintenance lithium monotherapy was associated with improved outcome compared with another mood stabilizer in monotherapy, including valproate, lamotrigine, olanzapine, quetiapine, unspecified anticonvulsants, carbamazepine/lamotrigine, unspecified atypical antipsychotics and unspecified antipsychotics. Among the four identified studies including a total of > 4000 patients comparing maintenance combination therapy with maintenance monotherapy, a few combination therapies were found to be superior to monotherapy in some analyses, but many were not. CONCLUSIONS The results show the superiority in real life of lithium monotherapy compared with monotherapy with other maintenance mood stabilizers. The four largest register-based studies largely addressed confounding, but, as ever, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the observational findings substantially add to the findings from randomized controlled trials, whose designs often limit the validity of comparison between medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Vedel Kessing
- Department O, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Bauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Willem A Nolen
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuel Severus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Guy M Goodwin
- University Department of Psychiatry and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - John Geddes
- University Department of Psychiatry and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zegwaard MI, Aartsen MJ, Grypdonck MHF, Cuijpers P. Trust: an essential condition in the application of a caregiver support intervention in nursing practice. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:47. [PMID: 28148235 PMCID: PMC5288942 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1209-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent policy of deinstitutionalization of health care in Western countries has resulted in a growing number of people - including elderly - with severe mental illness living in the community where they rely on families and others for support in daily living. Caregiving for partners, parents, children, and significant others can be a stressful experience and has been associated with psychosocial problems and poorer physical health. To support caregivers, a new, complex, nurse-led caregiver - centered intervention was developed. The intervention focuses on preventing deterioration in the wellbeing of caregivers. The objective of this study is to obtain a better understanding of the potentials of this new intervention. METHODS We applied an interpretative qualitative field study at two Dutch mental health care institutes. Thirteen caregivers participated in a one-time semi-structured interview. RESULTS From the caregivers' perspective, a trusting relationship between caregivers and the mental health nurse is an essential condition for the depth and hence the effectiveness of the caregiver-centered counseling intervention. In this trusting relationship three overlapping and mutually reinforcing phases were identified (1) phase of engagement, (2) recognition of personal needs and (3) hope and optimism. Each phase encompasses key experiences that enhanced trust in that phase. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative relationships between caregivers and mental health nurses provide a framework in which the mental health nurse can assess and help not only patients but also caregivers to gain insight into their situation and take on new roles and responsibilities in ways that promote their wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian I. Zegwaard
- Altrecht Mental Health Care, Gedachtengang 1, 3705 WH Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Marja J. Aartsen
- 0000 0000 9151 4445grid.412414.6NOVA Norwegain Social Research, Oslo and Akershus University College, Postbox 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130 Norway
| | - Mieke HF Grypdonck
- 0000 0001 2069 7798grid.5342.0University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, block 5K3, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- 0000 0004 1754 9227grid.12380.38Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, 1081, BT The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rexhaj S, Leclerc C, Bonsack C, Golay P, Favrod J. Feasibility and Accessibility of a Tailored Intervention for Informal Caregivers of People with Severe Psychiatric Disorders: a Pilot Study. Front Psychiatry 2017; 8:178. [PMID: 28983262 PMCID: PMC5613087 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a new tailored intervention for informal caregivers: the Ensemble (Together) program. METHODS An open pre-post within-subject comparison pilot study was conducted. Twenty-one informal caregivers completed the five-session Ensemble program. Two measurement tools were used: The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Life Orientation Scale (LOT-R). RESULTS The results showed that informal caregivers were in need of individual support and were ready to participate in the Ensemble program independent of the patient's diagnosis or stage of illness. The participants were very satisfied, and 95.4% completed the program. The preliminary results also showed that in five sessions, informal caregivers' Global Severity Index measured by the BSI and their optimism about their future (measured by the LOT-R) were significantly improved. CONCLUSION This pilot study provided preliminary results concerning the feasibility and acceptability of the tailored Ensemble program and indicates the need for a randomized trial. The Ensemble program is appropriate for both the acute and chronic phases of disease. Individualized brief and useful interventions for informal caregivers may provide more positive outcomes in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyhrete Rexhaj
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Health Care, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Nursing Sciences, La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Leclerc
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Health Care, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charles Bonsack
- Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Golay
- Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Favrod
- Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Nursing Sciences, La Source, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reinares M, Bonnín CM, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Colom F, Solé B, Jiménez E, Torrent C, Comes M, Martínez-Arán A, Sánchez-Moreno J, Vieta E. Family functioning in bipolar disorder: Characteristics, congruity between patients and relatives, and clinical correlates. Psychiatry Res 2016; 245:66-73. [PMID: 27526319 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Functional improvement has become one of the aims of the treatment of bipolar disorder. However, scant attention has been given to family functioning, even though it has a role in the illness outcome and is affected by the disorder. The aims of this study were to compare family functioning reported by euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls; explore the level of congruence in the perception of family environment between patients with bipolar disorder and their relatives; and analyse the relationship between clinical variables and family functioning. The sample comprised 82 adult euthymic subjects with bipolar disorder, 82 family caregivers of these patients and 47 healthy controls. Participants completed the Family Environment Scale. Results showed moderate correlations and a mean pattern almost identical between relatives' and patients' reported scores in family functioning subscales. There were significant differences between patients and controls, favourable for the latter, in the subscales cohesion (p<0.005), expressiveness (p=0.002), conflict (p=0.038), intellectual-cultural orientation (p=0.001), active-recreational orientation (p<0.005), and a non-significant trend in organization (p=0.064). Significant associations were found between family environment and clinical variables of severity. These findings contribute to increasing the understanding of family functioning in bipolar disorder and highlight the importance of family work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Reinares
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - C Mar Bonnín
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Colom
- Mental Health Group, IMIM-Hospital del Mar-CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Brisa Solé
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Jiménez
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carla Torrent
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Comes
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anabel Martínez-Arán
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Sánchez-Moreno
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Family psychoeducation for major depressive disorder - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:427. [PMID: 27577267 PMCID: PMC5006499 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1549-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Major depressive disorder has been shown to affect many domains of family life including family functioning. Conversely, the influence of the family on the course of the depression, including the risk of relapse, is one reason for targeting the family in interventions. The few studies conducted within this area indicate that family psychoeducation as a supplement to traditional treatment can effectively reduce the risk of relapse in patients with major depression as well as being beneficial for the relatives involved. However, the evidence is currently limited. This study will investigate the effect of family psychoeducation compared to social support on the course of the illness in patients with major depressive disorder. Method/design The study is designed as a dual center, two-armed, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Relatives are randomized to participate in one of two conditions: either four sessions of manualized family psychoeducation or four sessions in a social support group led by a health care professional. Patients will not participate in the groups and will continue their treatment as usual. A total of 100 patients, each accompanied by one relative, will be recruited primarily from two outpatient clinics in the Capital Region of Denmark. The primary outcome is the occurrence of depressive relapse at 9-month follow-up defined as a score ≥7 on the Hamilton six-item subscale. Secondary outcomes will include time to relapse. Discussion It is hoped that the results from this study will help to clarify the mechanisms behind any beneficial changes due to family psychoeducation and provide information on the long-term effect of this intervention for both patient and relatives. If the results are positive, the family psychoeducation program may be suitable for implementation within a clinical setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02348827, registered 5 January 2015.
Collapse
|
23
|
Brief group psychoeducation for caregivers of individuals with bipolar disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2016; 200:31-6. [PMID: 27116364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder is associated with significant impairment in personal and social functioning for the individual and their caregivers. Psychoeducation for caregivers is beneficial, but interventions have typically required a significant time commitment and have not assessed changes in self-efficacy. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief, two-session psychoeducational intervention for caregivers. It was hypothesized that the intervention would reduce caregiver burden and distress, and increase bipolar disorder knowledge and bipolar disorder self-efficacy. METHODS Participants (N=32) were randomized to immediate or waitlist control conditions. The intervention involved two, 150-minute group sessions spaced one-week apart. At pre-, post-, and one-month follow-up participants completed the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21), Burden Assessment Scale, Knowledge of Bipolar Disorder Scale, and a Bipolar Disorder Self-efficacy Scale. RESULTS Compared to the waitlist control group, the immediate treatment group demonstrated large and significant reductions in caregiver burden, and increases in bipolar disorder knowledge and bipolar disorder self-efficacy. These improvements maintained or increased to follow-up. No significant change was observed on the DASS-21. LIMITATIONS Reliance on self-report and the sample comprised mostly of parents and partners, so it unclear if results generalize to other carer groups. CONCLUSIONS Large and enduring improvements in carer burden, knowledge, and bipolar disorder self-efficacy can be achieved from a very brief, two-session intervention.
Collapse
|
24
|
de Souza MS, da Silva RA, Molina MAL, Jansen K, de Lima Ferreira L, Kelbert EF, Soares JM, de Mattos Souza LD. Six-session caregiver psychoeducation on bipolar disorder: Does it bring benefits to caregivers? Int J Soc Psychiatry 2016; 62:377-85. [PMID: 26975694 DOI: 10.1177/0020764016636909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the impact of psychoeducational intervention on the levels of burden, of self-esteem and quality of life in caregivers of patients diagnosed with Bipolar Disorders. METHOD In this randomized clinical trial, changes in degree of burden, levels of self-esteem and quality of life were evaluated. Caregivers could participate in the group of psychoeducation (six sessions) or usual treatment (without psychoeducation following a manual). RESULTS There were no significant differences regarding levels of objective burden between groups. Both groups presented improvement in subjective burden scores throughout the interventions. Objective burden scores showed significant reduction in the usual treatment group (p = .003) and a trend toward decrease in the psychoeducational intervention (p = .081). There are no differences regarding improvement in perceived self-esteem and quality of life when comparing means between the groups with and without intervention. CONCLUSION A six-session caregiver psychoeducational intervention on bipolar disorder did not bring benefits to caregiver's health. A longer longitudinal follow-up study would be crucial to see whether there were differences in degree of burden, perceived self-esteem and quality of life over time in caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Karen Jansen
- Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPel), Pelotas, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bijker L, Kleiboer A, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Donker T. E-care 4 caregivers - an online intervention for nonprofessional caregivers of patients with depression: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:193. [PMID: 27068807 PMCID: PMC4827207 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1320-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nonprofessional caregivers are highly important in the everyday life of patients with depression. Yet, they may experience increased levels of burden, stress, depression, and anxiety. Therefore, there is a need for interventions that relieve symptoms and are accessible and time-efficient. This paper describes the protocol of a pilot study to evaluate (1) the feasibility of an online self-management intervention, E-care 4 caregivers, for the nonprofessional caregiver of patients with depression, and (2) the initial effects of E-care 4 caregivers on psychological distress, subjective burden, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life. Methods/design The study is a randomized controlled trial in which we are comparing the E-care 4 caregivers online intervention with a wait list control group. Eighty-four nonprofessional caregivers of patients with depression aged 18 years or older are being recruited from among the general population. Feasibility is determined by semistructured telephone interviews evaluating the subjects’ satisfaction with the intervention and by using a questionnaire on the user-friendliness of the system. The primary outcome measure used to examine the initial effects of the intervention is psychological distress. Secondary outcome measures are subjective burden, symptoms of anxiety and depression, level of mastery, and quality of life. Assessments will be done at baseline and 6 weeks later. Statistical analysis of the effects of the intervention will be carried out on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion E-care 4 caregivers could potentially benefit nonprofessional caregivers, as well as patients and professionals indirectly. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register identifier: NTR5268. Registered on 30 June 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bijker
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - A Kleiboer
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Riper
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T Donker
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Perlick DA, Berk L, Kaczynski R, Gonzalez J, Link B, Dixon L, Grier S, Miklowitz DJ. Caregiver burden as a predictor of depression among family and friends who provide care for persons with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2016; 18:183-91. [PMID: 27004622 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Over one-third of caregivers of people with bipolar disorder report clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. This study examined the causal relationship between depression and caregiver burden in a large sample of caregivers of adult patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS Participants were 500 primary caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).This study evaluates the strength and direction of the associations between caregiver burden and depressive symptoms at baseline and at six- and 12-month follow-up using cross-lagged panel analyses, controlling for the clinical status of patients and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Higher levels of overall caregiver burden at baseline were associated with increased levels of depressive symptoms among caregivers at follow-up (F = 8.70, df = 1,290, p < 0.001), after controlling for baseline caregiver depression, gender, race, age, social support, and patients' clinical status. By contrast, caregiver depression at baseline was not significantly associated with caregiver burden at follow-up (F = 1.65, p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS Caregiver burden is a stronger predictor of caregiver depressive symptoms over time than the reverse. Interventions that help alleviate caregiver burden may decrease depressive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Perlick
- James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and VISN 3 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Bronx, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lesley Berk
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Kaczynski
- Veterans Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jodi Gonzalez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Bruce Link
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Dixon
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Practice Innovations, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Savannah Grier
- James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and VISN 3 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Bronx, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David J Miklowitz
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reinares M, Bonnín C, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Sánchez-Moreno J, Colom F, Vieta E. The role of family interventions in bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2016; 43:47-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Revised: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
28
|
Neely J, Miklowitz D, Le Couteur A, Ryan V, Vale L, McGovern R, Sharma A. A feasibility study of a Family Focused Treatment for Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder-the FAB study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2015; 1:43. [PMID: 27965821 PMCID: PMC5153680 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0038-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial of Family Focused Treatment for Adolescents UK (FFT-A UK) in the management of early-onset bipolar disorder (EOBD) (under 18 years). The FFT-A has been evaluated in the USA to augment the pharmacological treatment of adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD). The FFT-A UK has been condensed to 16 sessions over approximately 6 months to be utilised within the UK National Health Service. Research from the USA suggests that families experience high levels of distress, stress, burden and family disharmony when living with a young person who has BD. The FFT-A UK is a family-based approach designed to increase understanding of BD (psycho-education), improve communication and increase ability to problem-solve. Methods/Design The trial will examine the feasibility of a randomised, parallel group, non-blinded design and the procedures of a subsequent definitive trial. Thirty-three young people with BD and their families will be recruited. Participants will complete measures at baseline, on completion of the 6-month treatment and again after a further 6 months. The self-report measures include the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), Conflict Behaviour Questionnaire aka ‘Interaction Behaviour Questionnaire’, EuroQuol EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-Y. Primary outcomes will be rates of eligibility, recruitment and retention, estimates of the variability in the self-report measures and assessment of the intervention delivery in the study population. Participants’ qualitative views on the measures and intervention will be sought to confirm the acceptability of intervention and study design. The health economics component will establish how cost-effectiveness will be assessed in a future definitive trial. Discussion The study will produce a full trial protocol and amendments to the FFT-A UK to inform a well-designed multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy in the management of EOBD. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN59769322
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Neely
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
| | - David Miklowitz
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 760 Westwood Plaza Room 58-217, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1759 USA
| | - Ann Le Couteur
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Vicky Ryan
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK ; Complex Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Adolescent Bipolar Service, Walkergate Park Hospital, Benfield, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE6 4QD UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kolostoumpis D, Bergiannaki JD, Peppou LE, Louki E, Fousketaki S, Patelakis A, Economou MP. Effectiveness of Relatives’ Psychoeducation on Family Outcomes in Bipolar Disorder. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2015.1076292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
30
|
Group Psychoeducation for Relatives of Persons With Bipolar Disorder: Perceived Benefits for Participants and Patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 2015; 203:730-4. [PMID: 26313039 DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Psychoeducation is a key element in the management of patients with bipolar disorders. The present study explored the perception of patients and family members with respect to group psychoeducation for relatives. Patients (n = 20) and relatives (n = 26) were assessed with questionnaires about perceived benefits and quality of life (median 4 years after participation). A large majority (>80%) of relatives acknowledged benefits with respect to easier detection of the early warning signs of relapse, improved quality of life, feeling more involved, and engaging in higher quality caregiving activities. Patients were less positive in general, but agreed that the program had helped them deal with crises, increased their feeling of being understood by relatives, and promoted positive changes in the family (>60%). Perceived positive changes in the family were associated with higher quality of life for relatives and patients. The present study highlights the importance of communication enhancement in group psychoeducation for relatives.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kessing LV. Treatment Options in Bipolar Disorder: Lessons from Population-Based Registers with Focus on Lithium. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40501-015-0047-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
32
|
Yesufu-Udechuku A, Harrison B, Mayo-Wilson E, Young N, Woodhams P, Shiers D, Kuipers E, Kendall T. Interventions to improve the experience of caring for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206:268-74. [PMID: 25833867 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal caregiving is an integral part of the care of people with severe mental illness, but the support needs of those providing such care are not often met. AIMS To determine whether interventions provided to people caring for those with severe mental illness improve the experience of caring and reduce caregiver burden. METHOD We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions delivered by health and social care services to informal carers (i.e. family or friends who provide support to someone with severe mental illness). RESULTS Twenty-one RCTs with 1589 carers were included in the review. There was evidence suggesting that the carers' experience of care was improved at the end of the intervention by psychoeducation (standardised mean difference -1.03, 95% CI -1.69 to -0.36) and support groups (SMD = -1.16, 95% CI -1.96 to -0.36). Psychoeducation had a benefit on psychological distress more than 6 months later (SMD = -1.79, 95% CI -3.01 to -0.56) but not immediately post-intervention. Support interventions had a beneficial effect on psychological distress at the end of the intervention (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI -1.48 to -0.49) as did problem-solving bibliotherapy (SMD = -1.57, 95% CI -1.79 to -1.35); these effects were maintained at follow-up. The quality of the evidence was mainly low and very low. Evidence for combining these interventions and for self-help and self-management was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Carer-focused interventions appear to improve the experience of caring and quality of life and reduce psychological distress of those caring for people with severe mental illness, and these benefits may be gained in first-episode psychosis. Interventions for carers should be considered as part of integrated services for people with severe mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Bronwyn Harrison
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Norman Young
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Peter Woodhams
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - David Shiers
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Tim Kendall
- Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, PhD, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Bronwyn Harrison, BSc, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Norman Young, MSc, Cardiff and Vale UHB and Cardiff University, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff; Peter Woodhams, MCIPD, Carer, Alveston, Stratford upon Avon; David Shiers, MBChB, retired GP, National Audit of Schizophrenia, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; Elizabeth Kuipers, PhD, Department of Clinical Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, and National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit, London; Tim Kendall, FRCPsych, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Efficacy of psychoeducational family intervention for bipolar I disorder: A controlled, multicentric, real-world study. J Affect Disord 2015; 172:291-9. [PMID: 25451428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assessed the efficacy of the Falloon model of psychoeducational family intervention (PFI), originally developed for schizophrenia management and adapted to bipolar I disorder. The efficacy of the intervention was evaluated in terms of improvement of patients׳ social functioning and reduction of family burden. METHODS This was a multicentre, real-world, controlled, outpatient trial carried out in 11 randomly recruited Italian mental health centres. Enroled patients and key-relatives were consecutively allocated either to receive PFI and Treatment As Usual (TAU) or to a waiting list receiving TAU alone. The efficacy of the intervention was evaluated in terms of improvement in patients׳ social functioning (primary outcome) and reduction of family burden (secondary outcome). RESULTS Of the 137 recruited families, 70 were allocated to the experimental group and 67 to the control group. At the end of the intervention, significant improvements in patients׳ social functioning and in relatives׳ burden were found in the treated group compared to TAU. This effect of the intervention remained also after controlling for several confounding patient׳s socio-demographic and clinical factors. The experimental intervention had an impact also on other outcome measures, such as patients׳ clinical status and personal burden. LIMITATIONS Lack of an active control group. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study clearly show that the psychoeducational family intervention according to the Falloon model is effective in improving the social outcome of patients with bipolar I disorder.
Collapse
|
34
|
Miziou S, Tsitsipa E, Moysidou S, Karavelas V, Dimelis D, Polyzoidou V, Fountoulakis KN. Psychosocial treatment and interventions for bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2015; 14:19. [PMID: 26155299 PMCID: PMC4493813 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-015-0057-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic disorder with a high relapse rate, significant general disability and burden and with a psychosocial impairment that often persists despite pharmacotherapy. This indicates the need for effective and affordable adjunctive psychosocial interventions, tailored to the individual patient. Several psychotherapeutic techniques have tried to fill this gap, but which intervention is suitable for each patient remains unknown and it depends on the phase of the illness. METHODS The papers were located with searches in PubMed/MEDLINE through May 1st 2015 with a combination of key words. The review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Items for Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS The search returned 7,332 papers; after the deletion of duplicates, 6,124 remained and eventually 78 were included for the analysis. The literature supports the usefulness only of psychoeducation for the relapse prevention of mood episodes and only in a selected subgroup of patients at an early stage of the disease who have very good, if not complete remission, of the acute episode. Cognitive-behavioural therapy and interpersonal and social rhythms therapy could have some beneficial effect during the acute phase, but more data are needed. Mindfulness interventions could only decrease anxiety, while interventions to improve neurocognition seem to be rather ineffective. Family intervention seems to have benefits mainly for caregivers, but it is uncertain whether they have an effect on patient outcomes. CONCLUSION The current review suggests that the literature supports the usefulness only of specific psychosocial interventions targeting specific aspects of BD in selected subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Miziou
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloníki, Greece
| | | | | | - Vangelis Karavelas
- Division of Neurosciences, 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 6, Odysseos Street (1st Parodos, Ampelonon Str.), Pournari Pylaia, 55535 Thessaloníki, Greece
| | - Dimos Dimelis
- Division of Neurosciences, 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 6, Odysseos Street (1st Parodos, Ampelonon Str.), Pournari Pylaia, 55535 Thessaloníki, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
- Division of Neurosciences, 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 6, Odysseos Street (1st Parodos, Ampelonon Str.), Pournari Pylaia, 55535 Thessaloníki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Effectiveness of a behavioral family psychoeducational program for Egyptian patients with bipolar disorder and their caregivers. MIDDLE EAST CURRENT PSYCHIATRY 2014. [DOI: 10.1097/01.xme.0000453069.21124.74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
36
|
Reinares M, Sánchez-Moreno J, Fountoulakis KN. Psychosocial interventions in bipolar disorder: what, for whom, and when. J Affect Disord 2014; 156:46-55. [PMID: 24439829 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Revised: 12/09/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition with a high relapse rate, morbidity and psychosocial impairment that often persist despite pharmacotherapy, highlighting the need for adjunctive psychosocial treatments. It is still unclear which populations are most likely to benefit from which approach and the best timing to implement them. METHODS A review was conducted with the aim to determine what the efficacious psychological treatments are, for whom and when. Randomized-controlled trials and key studies in adults with BD published until June 2013 were included RESULTS The adjunctive psychological treatments most commonly tested in BD were cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and family intervention. The efficacy of specific adjunctive psychosocial interventions has been proven not only in short- but also long-term follow-up for some treatments. Outcomes vary between studies, with most trials focused on clinical variables like recurrence prevention or symptom reduction and less attention, although gradually expanding, paid to other aspects such as psychosocial functioning. The samples were usually in remission or with mild symptoms when recruited but there were a few studies with acute patients, which resulted in discrepant findings. The efficacy of psychological interventions seems to differ depending on the characteristics of the subjects and the course of the illness. Different approaches, such as functional remediation and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, have begun to be tested in BD. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity of comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive psychological treatments can improve BD outcomes. Although several moderators and mediators have been identified, more research is needed to design shorter but effective interventions tailored to the characteristics of the target population. Ideally, the treatment should be introduced as soon as possible, although it does not mean that more complex patients would not benefit from psychotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Reinares
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José Sánchez-Moreno
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Crandall EK, Ruggero CJ, Bain K, Kilmer J. Adjustment Difficulties and Caregiving Burdens Faced by College Students with a Parent with Bipolar or Depressive Disorders. JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT PSYCHOTHERAPY 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/87568225.2014.854678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
Bipolar disorder is an episodic condition usually requiring long-term, often life-long, treatment to control acute symptoms and stabilize mood. Clinicians face several challenges when deciding on the most appropriate long-term management strategy for patients with bipolar disorder, and consideration must be given to the heterogeneity of symptoms, tolerability and patient acceptability as well as individual history of response. Numerous treatments are available for the management of bipolar disorder, including lithium, divalproex, conventional antipsychotics, the anticonvulsant lamotrigine, and several newer atypical agents, including olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. Antidepressants may also have a role in managing acute depressive episodes but are not recommended as monotherapy in either acute or long-term maintenance treatment. Studies suggest that pharmacologic treatment given in conjunction with cognitive therapy or group psychoeducation is superior to usual care. This article reviews current treatment options and management strategies for the long-term maintenance of health in patients with bipolar disorder. Particular emphasis is given to the atypical agents and psychosocial strategies aimed at optimizing treatment adherence and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Vieta
- Clinical Institute of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, Rossello 140, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Berk L, Berk M, Dodd S, Kelly C, Cvetkovski S, Jorm AF. Evaluation of the acceptability and usefulness of an information website for caregivers of people with bipolar disorder. BMC Med 2013; 11:162. [PMID: 23844755 PMCID: PMC3717000 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder is associated with extreme mood symptoms, disability and suicide risk. Close family or friends often have a primary role in supporting an adult with bipolar disorder. However, not all support is helpful and there is little publicly accessible evidence-based information to guide caregivers. Caregiver burden increases the risk of caregiver depression and health problems. To help fill the information gap, expert clinicians, caregivers and consumers contributed to the development of guidelines for caregivers of adults with bipolar disorder using the Delphi consensus method. This paper reports on an evaluation of the acceptability and usefulness of the online version of the guidelines, http://www.bipolarcaregivers.org. METHODS Visitors to the website responded to an initial online survey about the usefulness of the information (N=536). A more detailed follow-up feedback survey was emailed to web users who were adult caregivers of adults with bipolar disorder a month later (N=121). The feedback was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to establish user appraisals of the online information, whether and how caregivers applied the information and ways it could be improved. RESULTS The majority of users (86.4% to 97.4%) found the various sections of the website useful. At follow-up, nearly 93% of caregivers reported that the information was relevant to them and 96% thought it would help others. Most respondents said that the information was supportive and encouraged adaptive control appraisals. However, a few respondents who were experiencing complex family problems, or who cared for a person with severe chronic bipolar disorder did not appraise it as positively. Nevertheless, over two-thirds of the caregivers reported using the information. Optional interactive features were recommended to maximize benefits. CONCLUSIONS Overall, http://www.bipolarcaregivers.org was appraised positively and used. It appears useful to close family and friends seeking basic information and reassurance, and may be an inexpensive way to disseminate guidelines for caregivers. Those who care for people with more severe and chronic bipolar disorder, or who have complex family problems might benefit from more specialized interventions, suggesting the importance of a stepped-care approach to supporting caregivers. The potential of evidence-based, collaboratively developed information websites to enhance caregiver and consumer outcomes merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Adaptation and analysis of psychometric features of the Caregiver Risk Screen: a tool for detecting the risk of burden in family caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr 2013; 25:755-64. [PMID: 23388522 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610212002426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are a limited number of scales available in the Spanish language that can be used to detect burden among individuals who care for a dependent family member. The purpose of this work was to adapt and validate the Caregiver Risk Screen (CRS) scale developed by Guberman et al. (2001) (Guberman, N., Keefe, J., Fancey, P., Nahmiash, D. and Barylak, L. (2001). Development of Screening and Assessment Tools for Family Caregivers: Final Report. Montreal, Canada: Health Transition Fund). METHODS The sample was made up of 302 informal caregivers of dependent family members (average age 57.3 years, and 78.9% were women). Scale structure was subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent and convergent validity were assessed by correlation with validated questionnaires for measuring burden (Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI)) and psychological health (SCL-90-R). RESULTS The results show a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86), suitable fit of the one-dimensional model tested via confirmatory factor analysis (GFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.097), and appropriate convergent validity with similar constructs (r = 0.77 with ZBI; and r-values between 0.45 and 0.63 with SCL-90-R dimensions). CONCLUSIONS The findings are promising in terms of their adaptation of the CRS to Spanish, and the results enable us to draw the conclusion that the CRS is a suitable tool for assessing and detecting strain in family caregivers. Nevertheless, new research is required that explores all the psychometric features on the scale.
Collapse
|
41
|
Rusner M, Carlsson G, Brunt D, Nyström M. Towards a more liveable life for close relatives of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2013; 22:162-9. [PMID: 22712875 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00852.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The life of close relatives of persons with bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with emotional distress, depression, and a high level of use of mental health care. Illness-related changes of their life situation endanger relationships, social life, finances, and occupational functioning. Understanding of facilitating conditions for close relatives is still a neglected research area. The aim of the present study thus was to explore what makes the life of close relatives of persons with BD more liveable. A lifeworld phenomenological approach was used. The findings reveal that keeping distance, having stability in everyday life, and strengthening equality through transparent communication are conditions that enable close relatives to influence the unpredictable and its consequences and thus make life more liveable. This implies contributions from close relatives, the person with BD, and the caring services. We propose that health-care support should not be divided in support for the patient and/or the close relatives but instead be designed as support for the 'patient and close relatives' as a unit. Professional caregivers need to take responsibility for creating intersubjective settings for the person with BD and their close relatives to share their needs and make joint plans for how to influence the illness-related life issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Rusner
- School of Health Sciences, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Permanyer-Miralda G, Adam P, Guillamón I, Solans-Domènech M, Pons JMV. Characteristics of Spanish articles of "scientific quality" cited in clinical practice guidelines on mental health. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL 2013; 6:150-9. [PMID: 23395541 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2012.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2012] [Revised: 11/01/2012] [Accepted: 11/06/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The study aims to illustrate the impact of Spanish research in clinical decision making. To this end, we analysed the characteristics of the most significant Spanish publications cited in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on mental health. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a descriptive qualitative study on the characteristics of ten articles cited in Spanish CPG on mental health, and selected for their "scientific quality". We analysed the content of the articles on the basis of the following characteristics: topics, study design, research centres, scientific and practical relevance, type of funding, and area or influence of the reference to the content of the guidelines. RESULTS Among the noteworthy studies, some basic science studies, which have examined the establishment of genetic associations in the pathogenesis of mental illness are included, and others on the effectiveness of educational interventions. The content of those latter had more influence on the GPC, because they were cited in the summary of the scientific evidence or in the recommendations. Some of the outstanding features in the selected articles are the sophisticated designs (experimental or analytical), and the number of study centres, especially in international collaborations. Debate or refutation of previous findings on controversial issues may have also contributed to the extensive citation of work. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of studies in the CPG is not a sufficient condition of "quality", but their description can be instructive for the design of future research or publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda
- Unidad de Epidemiología, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Vall Hebron, Barcelona, España; Agència d'Informació, Avaluació i Qualitat en Salut, (Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya), Barcelona, España; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, España
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Scott J, Colom F, Pope M, Reinares M, Vieta E. The prognostic role of perceived criticism, medication adherence and family knowledge in bipolar disorders. J Affect Disord 2012; 142:72-6. [PMID: 22944191 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2011] [Revised: 04/04/2012] [Accepted: 04/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In schizophrenia, high levels of critical comments by significant others are associated with early relapse, especially if medication adherence is sub-optimal. Levels of criticism may be influenced by family knowledge about both the disorder and its treatment. No study has explored whether this combination factors influence outcome in adults with bipolar disorders. METHODS Medication adherence was assessed in 81 individuals with bipolar disorder of whom 75 rated perceived criticism by an identified 'significant other' as well as their own perceived sensitivity. 33 (of the 75) had a close family member who agreed to completed an assessment of their knowledge and understanding of bipolar disorders. Psychiatric admissions were then recorded prospectively over 12 months. RESULTS Perceived criticism and medication adherence were significant predictors of admission. In the patient-family member dyads (n=33), the odds ratio (OR) for admission was 3.3 (95% confidence intervals 1.3-8.6) in individuals with low levels of medication adherence, high perceived criticism, and a family member with poor knowledge and understanding. LIMITATIONS The small sub-sample of patient-family member dyads means those findings require replication. Sensitivity to criticism by professional caregivers may not equate to that by relatives. CONCLUSIONS Perceived criticism may be a simple but robust clinical predictor of relapse in mood disorders. High levels of perceived criticism, poor understanding of bipolar disorder by a significant other, and sub-optimal treatment adherence are risk factors for hospitalization in adults with bipolar disorders that are potentially modifiable through the use of strategic psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Scott
- Academic Psychiatry, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Perlick DA, Gonzalez J, Michael L, Huth M, Culver J, Kaczynski R, Calabrese J, Miklowitz DJ. Rumination, gender, and depressive symptoms associated with caregiving strain in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2012; 126:356-62. [PMID: 22607486 PMCID: PMC3870006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01874.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the associations between indices of caregiving strain, ruminative style, depressive symptoms, and gender among family members of patients with bipolar disorder. METHOD One hundred and fifty primary caregivers of patients enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) participated in a cross-sectional study to evaluate the role of ruminative style in maintaining depressive symptoms associated with caregiving strain. Patient lifetime diagnosis and current episode status were evaluated by the Affective Disorder Evaluation and the Clinical Monitoring Form. Caregivers were evaluated within 30 days of the patient on measures of family strain, depressive symptoms, and ruminative style. RESULTS Men and women did not differ on depression, caregiver strain, or ruminative style scores. Scores suggest an overall mild level of depression and moderate caregiver strain for the sample. Greater caregiver strain was significantly associated (P<0.05) with rumination and level of depressive symptoms, controlling for patient clinical status and demographic variables. Rumination reduced the apparent association between strain and depression by nearly half. Gender was not significantly associated with depression or rumination. CONCLUSION Rumination helps explain depressive symptoms experienced by both male and female caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder. Interventions for caregivers targeted at decreasing rumination should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. A. Perlick
- Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY,JJ Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and VISN 3 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - J. Gonzalez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - L. Michael
- Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - M. Huth
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI
| | - J. Culver
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - R. Kaczynski
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - J. Calabrese
- Department of Psychiatry, Case-Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - D. J. Miklowitz
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Provencher MD, Hawke LD, Bélair M, Guimond AJ. La psychoéducation pour les troubles bipolaires : recension des écrits et recommandations pour le système de santé québécois. SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC 2012; 37:157-87. [DOI: 10.7202/1012650ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Le trouble bipolaire est une maladie chronique caractérisée par une récurrence des rechutes thymiques, et par des symptômes résiduels interférant avec le fonctionnement de l’individu. La pharmacothérapie demeure la pierre angulaire du traitement. Malheureusement, la médication a des effets limités sur certains aspects de la maladie, sans compter qu’une grande proportion de patients présente des problèmes d’observance à leur traitement pharmacologique. Cette recension des écrits aborde le rôle de la psychoéducation comme traitement complémentaire dans la prise en charge des patients bipolaires. Les différentes modalités de psychoéducation structurée, dont deux programmes psychoéducatifs manualisés appuyés par des données probantes, sont présentées. Dans une perspective de transfert des connaissances, des recommandations pour l’implantation de la psychoéducation dans le système de santé québécois sont proposées.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin D. Provencher
- Psychologue
- Professeur agrégé, École de psychologie de l’Université Laval, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec
| | - Lisa D. Hawke
- Candidate au doctorat, École de psychologie de l’Université Laval
| | - Meggy Bélair
- Candidate au doctorat, École de psychologie de l’Université Laval
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fountoulakis KN, Kasper S, Andreassen O, Blier P, Okasha A, Severus E, Versiani M, Tandon R, Möller HJ, Vieta E. Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 262 Suppl 1:1-48. [PMID: 22622948 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-012-0323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The current statement is a systematic review of the available data concerning the efficacy of medication treatment of bipolar disorder (BP). A systematic MEDLINE search was made concerning the treatment of BP (RCTs) with the names of treatment options as keywords. The search was updated on 10 March 2012. The literature suggests that lithium, first and second generation antipsychotics and valproate and carbamazepine are efficacious in the treatment of acute mania. Quetiapine and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are also efficacious for treating bipolar depression. Antidepressants should only be used in combination with an antimanic agent, because they can induce switching to mania/hypomania/mixed states/rapid cycling when utilized as monotherapy. Lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine and aripiprazole are efficacious during the maintenance phase. Lamotrigine is efficacious in the prevention of depression, and it remains to be clarified whether it is also efficacious for mania. There is some evidence on the efficacy of psychosocial interventions as an adjunctive treatment to medication. Electroconvulsive therapy is an option for refractory patients. In acute manic patients who are partial responders to lithium/valproate/carbamazepine, adding an antipsychotic is a reasonable choice. The combination with best data in acute bipolar depression is lithium plus lamotrigine. Patients stabilized on combination treatment might do worse if shifted to monotherapy during maintenance, and patients could benefit with add-on treatment with olanzapine, valproate, an antidepressant, or lamotrigine, depending on the index acute phase. A variety of treatment options for BP are available today, but still unmet needs are huge. Combination therapy may improve the treatment outcome but it also carries more side-effect burden. Further research is necessary as well as the development of better guidelines and algorithms for the step-by-step rational treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 6 Odysseos str./1st Parodos Ampelonon str., Pylaia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fountoulakis KN. Refractoriness in bipolar disorder: definitions and evidence-based treatment. CNS Neurosci Ther 2011; 18:227-37. [PMID: 22070611 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00259.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Defining refractoriness in bipolar disorder is complex and should concern and include either every phase and pole or the disorder as a whole. The data on the treatment of refractory bipolar patients are sparse. Combination and add-on studies suggest that in acutely manic patients partial responders to lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine, a good strategy would be to add haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole. Adding oxcarbazepine to lithium is also a choice. There are no reliable data concerning the treatment of refractory bipolar depressives and also there is no compelling data for the maintenance treatment of refractory patients. It seems that patients stabilized on combination treatment might do worse if shifted from combination. Conclusively there are only limited and sometimes confusing data on the treatment of refractory bipolar patients. Further focused research is necessary on this group of patients.
Collapse
|
48
|
Berk L, Jorm AF, Kelly CM, Dodd S, Berk M. Development of guidelines for caregivers of people with bipolar disorder: a Delphi expert consensus study. Bipolar Disord 2011; 13:556-70. [PMID: 22017224 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00942.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Close family and friends are often a primary source of support for a person with bipolar disorder. However, there is a lack of information for caregivers about ways to provide helpful support and take care of themselves. Rates of caregiver burden are high and increase the risk of caregiver depression and health problems. This study aimed to develop guidelines to assist caregivers of adults with bipolar disorder to be informed about bipolar disorder and to support the person without neglecting their own wellbeing. METHODS The Delphi method was used to assess consensus between international expert panels of 45 caregivers, 47 consumers, and 51 clinicians about what information to include in the caregiver guidelines. Initial online survey items were based on the existing literature. Subsequent surveys included new or reworded items suggested by panel members and items that needed re-rating. Items endorsed by at least 80% of all three panels formed the content of the guidelines. RESULTS Nearly 86% of the 626 survey items were endorsed. The items covered information on the illness, treatment, and suggestions on ways caregivers can provide support and take care of themselves in the different phases of illness and wellness, and information on dealing with specific real-life challenges. Although consensus rates were high, meaningful areas of difference between panels were found (e.g., collaboration issues). CONCLUSIONS The guidelines provide comprehensive introductory information, suggestions, and resources for caregivers. Access to relevant information may help caregivers to cope constructively with the person's bipolar disorder and their caregiving situation. The content of the guidelines could be used to help formulate a stepped-care approach to supporting caregivers, ranging from basic information and pamphlets to brief training courses and specialized family or caregiver interventions based on need and accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Berk
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jönsson PD, Wijk H, Danielson E, Skärsäter I. Outcomes of an educational intervention for the family of a person with bipolar disorder: a 2-year follow-up study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2011; 18:333-41. [PMID: 21418433 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01671.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the outcomes of an educational intervention for family members living with a person with bipolar disorder. A longitudinal study was conducted comprising a 10-session educational intervention designed for families with members in outpatient mental health care. Thirty-four family members agreed to participate. Data were collected on five occasions, at baseline and during a 2-year follow-up through self-assessment instruments: the Carers of Older People in Europe Index, the Jalowiec Coping Scale-40, the Sense of Coherence questionnaire and the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale. The results showed that the condition had a considerable negative impact on the family members as carers, but the educational intervention increased their understanding, which facilitated the management of their lives. A significant improvement in stress management was seen over time and social functioning was retained. The study showed that families living with one member with bipolar disorder benefited from the educational intervention in terms of increasing understanding of the condition and reducing stress. Mental health care needs to develop educational interventions further and offer the families support to strengthen their ability to manage with the situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P D Jönsson
- Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences/Vårdalinstitutet and Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services in Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Madigan K, Egan P, Brennan D, Hill S, Maguire B, Horgan F, Flood C, Kinsella A, O'Callaghan E. A randomised controlled trial of carer-focussed multi-family group psychoeducation in bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2011; 27:281-4. [PMID: 21334858 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2010] [Revised: 12/15/2010] [Accepted: 12/16/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In a RCT of family psychoeducation, 47 carers of 34 patients were allocated to one of three groups; Multifamily Group Psychoeducation, Solution Focussed Group Therapy or Treatment as Usual. Carers in both the MFGP intervention and the SFGP arm demonstrated greater knowledge and reduction in burden than those in the TAU arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Madigan
- Cluain Mhuire Family Centre, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co. Dublin and Health Research Board, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|