One-year evaluation of the preventative effect of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate on eosinophilic inflammation of asthmatic peripheral airways

Real life clinical study design supporting the effectiveness of extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone/formoterol at the level of small airways of asthmatics

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to establish how treatment with inhaled extra-fine beclomethasone/formoterol (I-EF-BDP/F) formulation differs from other combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA), we studied lung function and markers of airway inflammation upon switching to the extra-fine formulation and after 8 weeks of treatment with it.

METHODS

We carried out a real-life clinical observation of undercontrolled asthmatic patients switched over from dry powder inhalers of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol to I-EF-BDP/F (Foster(®), Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Italy). The effects of 8-weeks of treatment were documented by means of visual analog scale (VAS), quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), spirometry and markers of airway or systemic inflammation: exhaled breath temperature (EBT), blood eosinophils (Eos), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP). Before/after treatment differences between forced vital capacity percent of predicted (%FVC), a simple indicator of small airways involvement, were calculated and subjects were ranked accordingly to reflect the magnitude of the therapeutic response. Subjects above the 75th percentile (n = 15), "top responders", were then compared with those below the 25th percentile (n = 15) "poor responders".

RESULTS

On average, the 59 patients completing the study (mean age ± SD 51 ± 12 years, 38 women) had significant improvement in VAS and QLQ scores at the end of the treatment period (49.1 ± 2.4 vs. 73.1 ± 2.05 and 146.1 ± 2.7 vs. 176.7.1 ± 3.4 respectively, P < 0.001), but not in the inflammatory indicators (EBT, CRP and Eos). However, when comparing the "top responders" with the "poor responders", significant improvement in these inflammatory indicators was observed: EBT significantly decreased from 34.04/mean/± 0.30/s.e.m./[°C] to 33.57 ± 0.33, P = 0.003, Eos in blood fell from 381.7 ± 91.2 [cells/μL] to 244.2 ± 43.2, P = 0.02. Before/after treatment differences in hsCRP decreased significantly in the top responders compared with the poor responders (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Asthmatic subjects who had the most improvement in FVC after transition to I-EF-BDP/F from other combined ICS/LABA preparations also demonstrated a significant decrease in some indicators of airway/systemic inflammation. These results support the notion that I-EF-BDP/F exerts an effect also at the level of the small airways through a reduction of the level of air trapping. Patients in whom inflammation of the small airways plays an important clinical role are the ones to derive most benefit from this small airways tailored treatment. However, improved compliance due to the "promise of a new drug" effect should also be considered as contributing to the treatment results.

Extrafine inhaled corticosteroid therapy in the control of asthma

Small airways disease plays an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but assessment of small airways impairment is not easy in everyday clinical practice. The small airways can be examined by several invasive and noninvasive methods, most of which can at present be used only in the experimental setting. Inhalers providing extrafine inhaled corticosteroid particle sizes may achieve sufficient deposition in the peripheral airways. Many studies have reported the beneficial effects of extrafine inhaled corticosteroids on inflammation, ie, on dysfunction in both the central and distal airways in asthmatics, and there are some data on asthma phenotypes in which the small airways seem to be affected more than in other phenotypes, including nocturnal asthma, severe steroid-dependent or difficult-to-treat asthma, asthma complicated by smoking, elderly asthmatic patients and/or patients with fixed airflow obstruction, and asthmatic children. The relevant randomized controlled clinical trials indicate that the efficacy of extrafine and nonextrafine inhaled corticosteroid formulations is similar in terms of primary endpoints, but there are certain clinically important endpoints for which the extrafine formulations show additional benefits.

Lung function changes in asthmatic children treated with HFA-BDP

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Asthma guidelines suggest that normal or near normal lung function should be one of the goals for good asthma control. Therefore, children with chronic persistent asthma and reduced peripheral airway function were assessed after the replacement of conventional inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with an extrafine aerosol formulation, hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethoasone diproprionate (HFA-BDP).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Lung function and clinical details were studied in children with moderate persistent asthma who regularly attended the pediatric pulmonary outpatient clinic at Kosair Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

SUBJECTS

A total of 20 children, 7 girls and 13 boys, with stable asthma but reduced forced expiratory flows between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF(25-75) ) were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

After the initial assessment, each subject was switched from conventional ICS to HFA-BDP. All other medications remained the same. Reassessment of lung function and clinical status was performed at least 3 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

FEF(25-75) increased from a mean of 50.75% to 68.85% predicted (P < 0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) also increased significantly from 84.6% to 93.8% predicted (P = 0.001). No changes asthma symptoms were observed.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional ICS, the use of HFA-BDP in asthmatic children significantly improves airflow in both the large and the peripheral airways without loss of asthma control.

[Therapeutic approach to the distal airways in asthma]

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects both the large-caliber airways and the smaller-caliber bronchioles. In the last few years, a major therapeutic advance has been made with the development of new systems of inhalation solutions, which produce extra-fine particles, achieving better lung deposition throughout the airways and reducing oropharyngeal deposition. These formulations have improved the effectiveness of bronchodilation and particularly the antiinflammatory effect. The use of long-acting b2-adrenergic steroids in extra-fine formulation, whether alone or in combinations of fixed doses, improves drug distribution throughout the bronchial tree, enhancing the therapeutic effect with lower doses of drugs. Leukotriene receptor antagonists have shown their effect on the small airways in asthmatic patients, both in studies of pulmonary resistance and pulmonary volumes and in imaging studies.

Targeting small airways in asthma: improvement in clinical benefit?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Disease control is not achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with asthma. Recent advances in aerosol formulations and delivery devices may offer more effective therapy. This review will focus on the importance and potential clinical benefit of targeting the lung periphery in adult asthma by means of ultra-fine aerosols.

RESULTS

Ultra-fine formulations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have improved lung deposition up to at least 50%, primarily in the peripheral airways. Ultra-fine formulations of ICS provide equivalent asthma control to non-ultra-fine ICS at approximately half the daily dose, with no increased risk of systemic effects. Clinical studies of adults with asthma have shown a greater effect of ultra-fine ICS, compared with non-ultra-fine ICS, on quality of life, small airway patency, and markers of pulmonary and systemic inflammation, but no difference with regard to conventional clinical indices of lung function and asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma patients treated with ultra-fine ICS, compared with non-ultra-fine ICS, have at least similar chance of achieving asthma control at a lower daily dose. Further clinical studies are needed to explore whether treatment with ultra-fine formulations of ICS will change the natural history of asthma and prevent airway remodelling in both the large and small airways.

The small airways and distal lung compartment in asthma and COPD: a time for reappraisal

The involvement of small airways in the pathogenesis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been debated for a long time. However, a proper definition of small airway disease is still lacking, and neither a widely accepted biomarker nor a functional parameter to assess small airway abnormalities and to explore the effect of tested compounds on small airways is available. Aiming towards increased knowledge and consensus on this topic, this perspective paper intends to (i) strengthen awareness among the scientific community on the role of small airways in asthma and COPD; (ii) examine the pros and cons of some biological, functional and imaging parameters in the assessment of small airway abnormalities; and (iii) discuss the evidence for distal airway pharmacological targeting in asthma and COPD.

Irreversiblity of remodeled features on high-resolution computerized tomography scans of asthmatic patients on conventional therapy: a 6-year longitudinal study

Airway remodeling can be assessed using high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) scanning of both parenchymal-and airway abnormalities in patients with asthma. The aim of this study was to examine structural changes in large and small airways of asthmatic patients using HRCT to determine if remodeling changes had occurred after prolonged use of conventional anti-asthma therapy. HRCT scans were evaluated prospectively for evidence of the following abnormalities: bronchial wall thickening (BWT), bronchiectasis, mucoid impactions, small centrilobular opacities, thick linear opacities, focal hyperlucency, and emphysema. Fifty mild and moderate asthmatics were enrolled in the study group. These abnormalities were re-evaluated in the patients after the passage of 6 years of regular anti-asthma medication. Forty-six of the patients completed the study. The probability of finding at least one abnormality by HRCT investigation was statistically higher in the second scan than in the first (26 patients [56.5%] versus 18 patients [39.1%], p = 0.02]. Irreversibility ratios of abnormalities were 80%, 100%, 75%, 87.7%, 77.8%, and 100% for BWT, bronchiectasis, small centrilobular opacities, focal hyperlucency, thick linear opacity, and emphysema, respectively. The ratios for newly detected structural abnormalities were 25%, 2.5%, 0%, 7.9%, 8.1%, and 0% for BWT, bronchiectasis, small centrilobular opacities, focal hyperlucency, thick linear opacity, and emphysema, respectively. New occurrences and progression in BWT are associated with the duration of asthma affliction (p = 0.03). The results of our study indicate that HRCT remodeling features, once occurring, are irreversible in most of the patients, and new remodeling features also occur despite administering the standard asthma treatment.