Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: new observations on the retinal phenotype - clinical and molecular report of an Italian family

Clinical and genetic features in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in Chinese cohort

PURPOSE

To provide a genotype and phenotype characterization of the BEST1 mutation in Chinese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) through multimodal imaging and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Seventeen patients from 17 unrelated families of Chinese origin with ARB were included in a retrospective cohort study. Phenotypic characteristics, including anterior segment features, were assessed by multimodal imaging. Multigene panel testing, involving 586 ophthalmic disease-associated genes, and Sanger sequencing were performed to identify disease-causing variants.

RESULTS

Among 17 ARB patients, the mean follow-up was 15.65 months and average onset age was 30.53 years (range: 9-68). Best corrected visual acuity ranged from light perception to 0.8. EOG recordings showed a typically decreased Arden ratio in 12 patients, and a normal or slightly decreased Arden ratio in two patients. Anterior features included shallow anterior chambers (16/17), ciliary pronation (16/17), iris bombe (13/17), iridoschisis (2/17), iris plateau (1/17), narrow angles (16/17) and reduced axial lengths (16/17). Sixteen patients had multiple bilateral small, round, yellow vitelliform deposits distributed throughout the posterior pole, surrounding the optic disc. Initial diagnoses included angle-closure glaucoma (four patients), Best disease (three patients), and central serous chorioretinopathy secondary to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (one patient), with the remainder diagnosed with ARB. Fourteen patients underwent preventive laser peripheral iridotomy, four of whom also received combined trabeculectomy and iridotomy in both eyes for uncontrolled intraocular pressure. One patient received intravitreal conbercept for CNV. Overall, 15 distinct disease-causing variants of BEST1 were identified, with 14 (82.35%) patients having missense mutations. Common mutations included p. Arg255-256 and p. Ala195Val (both 23.68%), with the most frequent sites in exons 7 and 5.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive characterization of anterior segment and genetic features in ARB, with a wide array of morphological abnormalities. Findings are relevant for refining clinical practices and genetic counseling and advancing pathogenesis research.

Peripapillary Sparing in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To demonstrate that peripapillary sparing on autofluorescence images is a characteristic feature of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional case series and review of previous published cases.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients with ARB.

METHODS

Ophthalmic assessment included best-corrected visual acuity testing, electrophysiologic examinations, and multimodal retinal imaging. Retinal imaging included OCT, blue-light autofluorescence imaging, fundus photography, and widefield pseudocolor and autofluorescence fundus imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of peripapillary sparing on fundus autofluorescence images.

RESULTS

Relatively normal-appearing peripapillary autofluorescence was identified in all patients, independent of the disease stage or presence of widespread changes on autofluorescence widefield images. OCT images of the peripapillary region revealed mild structural abnormalities, including a thinned outer nuclear layer and intraretinal or subretinal fluid. A review of previously published cases confirmed peripapillary sparing as consistent feature on fundus autofluorescence images. Genetic analysis revealed 10 previously reported mutations, 1 novel missense (c.83T>A; p.Ile28Asn) and 2 novel truncating (c.658C>T; p.Gln220* and c.1370C>G; p.Ser457*) variants in BEST1.

CONCLUSIONS

In ARB patients, peripapillary sparing is a consistent feature on fundus autofluorescence images, whereas the same region is less preserved on OCT images.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB)

Mutations in BEST1 cause several phenotypes including autosomal dominant (AD) Best vitelliform macular dystrophy type 2 (BVMD), AD vitreo-retino-choroidopathy (ADVIRC), and retinitis pigmentosa-50 (RP50). A rare subtype of Bestrophinopathy exists with biallelic mutations in BEST1. Its frequency is estimated to be 1/1,000,000 individuals. Here we report 6 families and searched for a genotype-phenotype correlation. All patients were referred due to reduced best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ranging from 0.1/10 to 3/10. They all showed vitelliform lesions located at the macula, sometimes extending into the midperiphery, along the vessels and the optic disc. Onset of the disease varied from the age of 3 to 25 years. Electrooculogram (EOG) revealed reduction in the EOG light rise in all patients. Molecular analysis revealed previously reported mutations p.(E35K);(E35K), p.(L31M);(L31M), p.(R141H);(A195V), p.(R202W);(R202W), and p.(Q220*);(Q220*) in five families. One family showed a novel mutation: p.(E167G);(E167G). All mutations were heterozygous in the parents. In one family, heterozygous children showed various reductions in the EOG light rise and autofluorescent deposits. Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB), although rare, can be recognized by its phenotype and should be validated by molecular analysis. Genotype-phenotype correlations are difficult to establish and will require the analysis of additional cases.

Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD or BVMD) is one of the most common macular dystrophies, affecting 1 in 10,000 individuals. The clinical presentation varies, depending on the stage of the disease at which the patient presents, usually one of these five stages: Previtelliform Vitelliform (Figs. 16.1, 16.2, 16.3 and 16.4) Pseudohypopyon Vitelliruptive (Fig. 16.5) Atrophic.

Multifocal Best's disease: The importance of genetic tests

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

Our objective is to describe a multifocal vitelliform presentation of Best's disease. The lesions in this disease may vary in size and shape, some may be a disc diameter in size, and often have some irregularity in their contour. The case is described of a 21-year-old male patient referred to our ophthalmology department due to a progressive loss of vision. His poor visual acuity was confirmed, and a complete examination was performed, in which macular flecks were observed, with yellow pigment arranged in oval distribution near their periphery. Due to the suspicion of Best's multifocal disease, genetic tests were performed. Multifocal vitelliform disease with the same features as those in Best's disease occurs most frequently in patients with a normal electro-oculogram (EOG), and a normal family history.

CONCLUSION

Best's multifocal disease must be suspected in case of multiple vitelliruptive lesions close to the posterior pole. Genetic testing is essential for its diagnosis.

A unique case series of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy exhibiting multigenerational inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. It has a variable phenotype with white flecks in the retina, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, macular edema, choroidal neovascularization, hyperopia, and electrophysiological abnormalities. We describe a family with ARB and multigenerational inheritance.

METHODS

Three generations of a Middle Eastern family (a woman, one son, and two grandchildren) were evaluated by our ocular genetics team. Eye examinations, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Genetic testing was obtained on examined patients and available relatives.

RESULTS

The proband demonstrated counting fingers vision and white flecks in the retinal periphery, with macular subretinal fluid (SRF), loss of outer photoreceptor segments, and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on OCT. Two grandchildren demonstrated decreased vision, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, and SRF on OCT. Two grandchildren examined elsewhere were reported to be similarly affected. A son's examination was normal except for extra-macular scars (from prior toxoplasmosis) and ERM. Genetic history revealed consanguinity and testing showed homozygosity for BEST1 mutations in the proband and two grandchildren c.473G>A/c.473G>A (R218H /R218H) and heterozygosity in two unaffected sons and two unaffected daughters-in-law c.473G>A/WT (p.R218H/WT).

DISCUSSION

We present a consanguineous family of five affected individuals with ARB and four confirmed carriers. Their pedigree was consistent with dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance. Genetic testing clarified the diagnosis and mode of inheritance. We describe the genetic findings, phenotypic variability, and recessive inheritance of an often dominantly inherited mutation as notable elements in their case.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy in Japanese Cohort

PURPOSE

To report the clinical and genetic findings of 9 Japanese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter observational case series.

METHODS

Nine ARB patients from 7 unrelated Japanese families that were examined in 3 institutions in Japan were studied. A series of ophthalmic examinations including fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, electrooculography (EOG), electroretinography, and the results of genetic analysis were reviewed.

RESULTS

Genetic analyses identified 7 pathogenic variants in BEST1 including 2 novel variants, c.478G>C (p.A160P) and c.948+1delG. Homozygous variants were found in 4 families and compound heterozygous variants were found in 3 families. Two patients were diagnosed as ARB only after the whole exome sequencing analyses. The Arden ratio of the EOG was less than 1.5 in all 7 patients tested. Vitelliform lesions typical for Best vitelliform macular dystrophy were not seen in any of the patients. Seven patients shared some of the previously described features of ARB: subretinal deposits, extensive subretinal fluid, and cystoid macular edema (CME). However, the other 2 patients with severe retinal degeneration lacked these features. Focal choroidal excavations were present bilaterally in 2 patients. One case had a marked reduction of the CME and expansion of subretinal deposits over an 8-year of follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese ARB patients had some but not all of the previously described features. Genetic analyses are essential to diagnose ARB correctly in consequence of considerable phenotypic variations.

Detailed analysis of family with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with new BEST1 mutation

Purpose

To describe the clinical and genetic findings in a patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and his healthy parents.

Methods

The patient and his healthy non-consanguineous parents underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluations including electro-oculography (EOG), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

The FAF images showed multiple spots of increased autofluorescence, and the sites of these spots corresponded to the yellowish deposits detected by ophthalmoscopy. SD-OCT showed cystoid macular changes and a shallow serous macular detachment. The Arden ratio of the EOG was markedly reduced to 1.1 in both eyes. Genetic analysis of the proband detected two sequence variants of the BEST1 gene in the heterozygous state: a novel variant c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 and an already described c.763C>T, p.R255W variant associated with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy and ARB. The proband’s father carried the c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 variant in the heterozygous state, and the mother carried the c.763C>T, p.R255W variant in the heterozygous state. The parents who were heterozygous for the BEST1 variants had normal visual acuity, EOG, SD-OCT, and FAF images.

Conclusions

In a truncating BEST1 mutation, the phenotype associated with ARB is most likely due to a marked decrease in the expression of BEST1 promoted by the nonsense-mediated decay surveillance mechanism, and it may depend on the position of the premature termination of the codon created.

New best1 mutations in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To report the ocular phenotype in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy and carriers, and to describe novel BEST1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected and subsequently genetically proven autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy underwent full ophthalmic examination and investigation with fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed through direct Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Five affected patients from four families were identified. Mean age was 16 years (range, 6-42 years). All affected patients presented with reduced visual acuity and bilateral, hyperautofluorescent subretinal yellowish deposits within the posterior pole. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated submacular fluid and subretinal vitelliform material in all patients. A cystoid maculopathy was seen in all but one patient. In 1 patient, the location of the vitelliform material was seen to change over a follow-up period of 3 years despite relatively stable vision. Visual acuity and fundus changes were unresponsive to topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and systemic steroids. Carriers had normal ocular examinations including normal fundus autofluorescence. Three novel mutations were detected.

CONCLUSION

Three novel BEST1 mutations are described, suggesting that many deleterious variants in BEST1 resulting in haploinsufficiency are still unknown. Mutations causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy are mostly located outside of the exons that usually harbor vitelliform macular dystrophy-associated dominant mutations.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: differential diagnosis and treatment options

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten patients with ARB from 7 different families.

METHODS

All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography (FA). In all probands, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), full-field electroretinography (ERG), electro-oculography (EOG), and Goldmann perimetry were performed. In selected patients, multifocal ERG was performed. Blood samples were obtained to analyze the BEST1 gene for biallelic mutations that confirmed the diagnosis of ARB.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age at onset; visual acuity; fundus appearance; characteristics on FA, FAF, OCT, full-field ERG, and EOG; BEST1 gene mutations; and genotype-phenotype correlation.

RESULTS

The age at onset varied widely, from 2 to 54 years. A spectrum of fundus abnormalities was observed, such as multifocal yellowish subretinal deposits, subretinal fibrous scars, and cystoid intraretinal fluid collections in the macula. All ARB patients were hyperopic, and some had shallow anterior chamber angles that predisposed them to angle-closure glaucoma. The EOG results were abnormal in all patients. The full-field ERG results were abnormal in 8 ARB patients, whereas 2 patients demonstrated normal cone and rod responses on full-field ERG. Nine ARB patients carried biallelic mutations in the BEST1 gene, and in 1 patient with a characteristic ARB phenotype, only 1 mutation could be identified. Seven different mutations were detected, including 4 novel mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy is a recognizable phenotype caused by autosomal recessively inherited mutations in the BEST1 gene. A differential diagnosis with other conditions can be made on the basis of marked autofluorescence changes in combination with an absent light rise on the EOG that outweighs the full-field ERG abnormalities, which point to the BEST1-related hereditary nature of the disease. A number of currently available therapeutic options should be considered in ARB, a disease that seems to be a suitable candidate for future gene therapy.