Effectiveness of new push/pull hemodiafiltration for arthralgia in long-term hemodialysis patients

Engineering perspective on the evolution of push/pull-based dialysis treatments

The incidence of kidney disease is rapidly increasing worldwide, and techniques and devices for treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have been evolving. Better outcomes achieved by convective treatment have encouraged the use of synthetic membranes with high water permeability in clinical setups, and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are now preferred forms of convective therapy in ESRD patients. Push/pull-based dialysis strategies have also been examined to increase convective mass transfer in ESRD patients. The push/pull technique uses the entire membrane as a forward filtration domain for a period of time. However, backfiltration must accompany the forward filtration to compensate for the fluid depletion resulting from the forward filtration, making it necessary to switch the membranes to a backfiltration domain. This paper attempts to describe the advancement of push/pull-based renal supportive treatments in terms of their technical description, hemodialytic efficacy including fluid management accuracy and applicability for clinical use. How the optimization of push and pull actions could translate into better convective efficiency will also be discussed in depth.

Push/pull hemodiafiltration: technical aspects and clinical effectiveness

Push/pull hemodiafiltration (HDF) is characterized by alternate repetition of filtration and backfiltration during hemodialysis with high-flux membrane. In the pressure-controlled push/pull (PC P/P) HDF system, which is the newest push/pull HDF system, there are about 25 repetitions of dilution and concentration of the blood while it passes through the hemodiafilter. Hence, the PC P/P is functionally close to the predilution mode of on-line HDF. In the PC P/P, body fluid is replaced usually by more than 120 L of dialysate during the 4 h treatment. In selecting a hemodiafilter for PC P/P, one must be certain that the blood flow channels in the hemodiafilter do not collapse by the positive pressure on the dialysate side in the backfiltration phase. Thus, the polyacrylonitrile hollow-fiber hemodiafilter and polysulfon hollow-fiber hemodiafilter are suitable for PC P/P. In the short term, PC P/P has been reported to be effective against joint pain, itchiness, insomnia, irritability, and restless leg syndrome experienced by hemodialysis patients. Midterm clinical effectiveness of PC P/P includes the requisite lowering of the erythropoietin dose and improvement in skin pigmentation. The albumin loss per treatment with the PC P/P was significantly lower than that with the conventional HDF approach when a protein-permeable membrane is used. In terms of the removal rate of prolactin, no significant difference was found between PC P/P and conventional HDF. On the other hand, the removal rates of myoglobin and beta2M, where molecular size was smaller than prolactin, was significantly greater with the PC P/P than with conventional HDF.