Pretherapeutic Plasma Fibrinogen Level is an Independent Survival Predictor in Renal Cell Carcinoma

High Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen Independently Predicts a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Nonmetastatic RCC

Background: This study aims to determine the relationship between preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels and the prognosis of patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data and prognostic information of 1194 nonmetastatic RCC patients who received radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery between 2005 and 2015 at our institution. Serum was collected for fibrinogen detection in the week prior to curative operation, and prognostic information was regularly collected by specially trained personnel. The cut-off value of the preoperative plasma fibrinogen level was defined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The chi-square test was used to analyse the association between preoperative fibrinogen level and clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival curves, and significant differences were determined by the log-rank test. Other significant prognostic factors were evaluated by the Cox multivariate proportional hazard model.

Results: The median follow-up period after radical or partial nephrectomy was 42.4 months (ranging from 0.433 to 146.37 months). The optimal preoperative plasma fibrinogen concentration was 3.975 g/L. The preoperative fibrinogen level was significantly associated with age, pathological T stage, sarcomatoid differentiation, necrosis and vein tumour thrombus (all p<0.05). High plasma fibrinogen levels were related to poor prognosis in terms of OS (p<0.001), CSS (p<0.001) and PFS (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative fibrinogen level remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 3.22, 95%CI: 1.87-5.55, p<0.001), CSS (HR: 4.12, 95%: 2.15-7.89, p<0.001) and PFS (HR: 3.137, 95%CI: 2.17-4.53, p<0.001).

Conclusions: High preoperative plasma fibrinogen level is an independent negative prognostic factor for OS, CSS and PFS in patients with non-metastatic RCC. Preoperative plasma fibrinogen could be an ideal indicator for evaluating the outcomes of postoperative patients with nonmetastatic RCC.

The Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Plasma Fibrinogen in Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: Growing evidence suggests pretreatment fibrinogen can serve as a prognostic marker in various malignancies. However, there are contradictory results about the prognostic role of fibrinogen in urological cancers. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pretreatment plasma fibrinogen and survival outcomes in urological cancers. Methods: After a systematic search of PubMed and Embase, we included 14 studies in our meta-analysis, and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using a fixed-effect model. Results: Our results indicate that pretreatment plasma fibrinogen is a prognostic factor in urological cancers (OS: HR=2.21, 95% CI=1.91-2.57, P<0.001, CSS: HR=2.67, 95% CI=2.23-3.19, P<0.001). Elevated pretreatment plasma fibrinogen is associated with poorer survival in prostate cancer (OS: HR=2.26, 95% CI=1.47-3.48, P<0.001; CSS: HR=2.42, 95% CI=1.44-4.07, P=0.001), renal cell carcinoma (OS: HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.75-2.61, P<0.001; CSS: HR=2.99, 95% CI=2.29-3.89, P<0.001) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (OS: HR=2.34, 95% CI=1.81-3.02, P<0.001; CSS: HR=2.43, 95% CI=1.84-3.20, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that plasma fibrinogen has a more negative impact on survival in Caucasian patients (OS: HR=2.52, 95% CI=1.95-3.25, P<0.001; CSS: HR=2.83, 95% CI=1.92-4.17, P<0.001) than Asian patients (OS: HR=2.07, 95% CI=1.73-2.49, P<0.001; CSS: HR=2.63, 95% CI=2.14-3.22, P<0.001). The prognostic value of fibrinogen is also consistent when stratified by different cut-off values. Conclusions: These results show that high pretreatment plasma fibrinogen levels can predict poorer OS and CSS in patients with urological cancers.

A Novel Predictor of Survival with Renal Cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To validate plasma fibrinogen and serum cholesterol levels as prognostic factors for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to explore the prognostic value of their combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical data for 1360 RCC patients after nephrectomy were collected. X-tile software was used to determine the cutoff values. The association between clinicopathological factors and fibrinogen and cholesterol levels was determined, and factors predicting survival were examined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 67 months (interquartile range 36-74 months). On univariate and multivariate analysis, both preoperative plasma fibrinogen and serum cholesterol were independent prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). By combining the two factors, we developed a novel index, fibrinogen-cholesterol (FC) score and found it to have better prognostic accuracy than the two factors alone. FC was an independent prognostic factor for both CSS (FC score = 1: hazard ratio [HR] = 3.207, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.775-5.793; FC score = 2: HR = 5.516, 95% CI = 2.891-10.527) and PFS (FC score = 1: HR = 2.178, 95% CI = 1.545-3.071; FC score = 2: HR = 3.709, 95% CI = 2.355-5.840).

CONCLUSION

Both preoperative plasma fibrinogen and serum cholesterol levels are independent prognostic factors for CSS and PFS in RCC patients after nephrectomy. A novel indicator, FC score, could be considered a novel preoperative prognostic index in RCC.

Clinical and Prognostic Effect of Plasma Fibrinogen in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background. Although numerous studies have shown that plasma fibrinogen is linked to renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk, the consistency and magnitude of the effect of plasma fibrinogen are unclear. The aim of the study was to explore the association between plasma fibrinogen and RCC prognosis. Methods. An electronic search of Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, and the Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant studies published prior to June 1, 2016. Results. A total of 3744 patients with RCC from 7 published studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prognostic and clinical relevance of plasma fibrinogen are evaluated in RCC patients. Statistical significance of the combined hazard ratio (HR) was detected for overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Our pooled results showed that elevated plasma fibrinogen was significantly associated with clinical stage and Fuhrman grading. The level of plasma fibrinogen was not found to be associated with tumor type and gender. Conclusions. Elevated plasma fibrinogen is a strong indicator of poorer prognosis of patients with RCC, whereas the plasma fibrinogen is not significantly associated with tumor type. Therefore, plasma fibrinogen could be used in patients with RCC for risk stratification and decision providing a proper therapeutic strategy.

Prognostic Value of Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, many studies have shown that the serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level is related to the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We launched this meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of serum LDH in patients with RCC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for information on serum LDH and the outcome of RCC through June 14, 2016. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and integrated from the matching studies.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies including 6629 patients with RCC were incorporated in this meta-analysis. Patients whose serum LDH levels were elevated had a lower OS (HR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.69-2.69, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the pooled data showed that a higher serum LDH level was a negative prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.48-2.04, P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analyses indicated elevated serum LDH was associated with poor survival in different tumor types. Elevated serum LDH was significantly associated with worse prognosis for patients with all stages of RCC (OS, HR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.09-5.33), metastatic RCC (OS, HR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.57-2.59; CSS, HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.49-2.15), and non-metastatic RCC (OS, HR = 3.67, CI = 1.33-10.13). Besides, elevated serum LDH also indicated a worse prognosis in subgroups of cut-off values, analysis types and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that serum LDH levels are associated with the outcomes of RCC and can be used as a valuable biomarker for monitoring prognoses.