Anatomical Variations of the Superficial Radial Nerve Encountered during Radial Forearm Free Flap Elevation

The superficial branch of the radial nerve and sensory disturbance in the radial forearm flap donor-site

Introduction

Sensory disturbance due to injury of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) is a donor-site morbidity of the radial forearm (RF) flap. The relationship between the SBRN preservation method and the post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site was retrospectively investigated.

Methods

We included 39 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with a free RF flap at Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2014 and March 2018. The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the SBRN preservation method: group 1, zero preservation, excision of the entire SBRN; group 2, main trunk preservation, excision of all branches except the main trunk of the SBRN; and group 3, complete preservation, preservation of the entire SBRN. Objective sensations and subjective symptoms at the flap donor-site were analyzed.

Results

The mean objective sensory scores were 3.18, 2.97, and 1.78 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 were significant (p = 0.0035 and p = 0.037, respectively). The mean subjective symptom scores were 2.40, 1.33, and 1.40 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 were significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.019, respectively).

Conclusions

Zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development at the flap donor-site than the complete preservation method. Despite inevitable objective hypoesthesia, the main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest; however, in case of perforator crossing, main trunk preservation is another option.

The Branching and Innervation Pattern of the Radial Nerve in the Forearm: Clarifying the Literature and Understanding Variations and Their Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

This study attempted to clarify the innervation pattern of the muscles of the distal arm and posterior forearm through cadaveric dissection.

METHODS

Thirty-five cadavers were dissected to expose the radial nerve in the forearm. Each muscular branch of the nerve was identified and their length and distance along the nerve were recorded. These values were used to determine the typical branching and motor entry orders.

RESULTS

The typical branching order was brachialis, brachioradialis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, supinator, extensor digitorum, extensor carpi ulnaris, abductor pollicis longus, extensor digiti minimi, extensor pollicis brevis, extensor pollicis longus and extensor indicis. Notably, the radial nerve often innervated brachialis (60%), and its superficial branch often innervated extensor carpi radialis brevis (25.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The radial nerve exhibits significant variability in the posterior forearm. However, there is enough consistency to identify an archetypal pattern and order of innervation. These findings may also need to be considered when planning surgical approaches to the distal arm, elbow and proximal forearm to prevent an undue loss of motor function. The review of the literature yielded multiple studies employing inconsistent metrics and terminology to define order or innervation.