Prolongation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Surgery: Seeking the Optimal Number of Cycles in Serous Ovarian Cancer

The evaluation of miR-1181 and miR-4314 as serum microRNA biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis and prognosis

AIM

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most ominous tumor of gynecological cancers due to its poor early detection rate and unfavorable prognosis. To date, there is no reliable screening method for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer at an early stage. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules, and their main function is to regulate gene expression. The present study compared the serum miR-1181 and miR-4314 levels in patients with EOC and healthy controls to measure the diagnostic and prognostic value as candidate biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected serum samples from a total of 135 participants (69 patients with EOC and 66 healthy controls). Relative expressions of miR-1181 and miR-4314 were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (qPCR).

RESULTS

The present study revealed that both serum miR-1181 and miR-4314 levels in patients with EOC were significantly increased compared to healthy controls for each marker. In addition, there was a significant relationship between miR-1181 and miR-4314 overexpressions and the stage and prognosis of the disease. Finally, patients with high expression levels of miR-1181 and miR-4314 had significantly shorter survival rates than those with low expression levels.

CONCLUSION

The current study proposed that serum miR-1181 and miR-4314 could discriminate the EOC patients from healthy controls. In addition, both miR-1181 and miR-4314 may be predictive biomarkers for ovarian cancer prognosis. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings of the present study.

3-4 Cycles versus 6 Cycles Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Survival Is Not Determined by the Number of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after 3-4 cycles or 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Out of 219 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, 123 patients received 3-4 cycles and 96 patients received 6 cycles of platinum-based NACT. Afterward, laparotomy was performed for interval cytoreductive surgery.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found for DFS and OS of the patients who received 3-4 cycles and those who received 6 cycles of NACT (HR: 1.047, 95.0% CI [0.779-1.407]; p: 0.746 for DFS, and HR: 1.181, 95.0% CI [0.818-1.707]; p: 0.368 for OS). Evaluating 123 patients who received 3-4 cycles of NACT, 87 patients (70.7%) without macroscopic residual tumor after interval cytoreductive surgery had significantly longer DFS and OS compared to 36 patients (29.3%) with any residual tumor (HR: 1.830, 95.0% CI [1.194-2.806]; p: 0.003 for DFS, and HR: 1.946, 95.0% CI [1.166-3.250]; p: 0.009 for OS). 96 patients who received 6 courses of NACT were evaluated; 63 patients (65.6%) without macroscopic residual tumor after interval cytoreductive surgery had significantly longer DFS and OS than 33 patients (34.4%) with any residual tumor (HR: 1.716, 9 5.0% CI [1.092-2.697]; p: 0.010 for DFS, and HR: 1.921, 95.0% CI [1.125-3.282]; p: 0.013 for OS).

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, there is no significant difference in DFS and OS between 3 and 4 cycles or 6 cycles of NACT. The most important factor determining survival is whether macroscopic residual tumor tissue remains after interval cytoreductive surgery following NACT.

Optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles prior to interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents a treatment option in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) who are not good candidates for primary debulking surgery. Usually, 3 cycles of chemotherapy before surgery have been considered the best option for patient survival, although quite often some patients receive more than 3 cycles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the optimal number of NACT cycles reporting better survival in AEOC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched for original articles that analyzed the relationship between the number of chemotherapy cycles and clinical outcomes in AEOC patients before interval debulking surgery (IDS). The main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies comprising 7,005 patients diagnosed with AEOC were included in our analysis. In terms of survival, the reviewed studies dividing the patients in ≤3 NACT cycles vs. >3, showed a trend for a decrease in PFS and a significant reduction in OS with an increasing number of cycles, while a difference in both PFS and OS was revealed if early IDS included patients with 4 NACT cycles. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the complex characteristics of AEOC patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our review and meta-analysis revealed that there is not enough evidence to determine the optimal number of NACT treatments before surgery. Further research in the form of well-designed randomized controlled trials is necessary to address this issue.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022334959.

Post-operative residual disease and number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles in patients with advanced ovarian cancer is still disputed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles and role of optimal cytoreduction on the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological details were examined. Patients were evaluated combining the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-namely, 'interval debulking surgery' after up to four neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, and 'delayed debulking surgery' after more than four cycles of therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients were included in the study. Complete cytoreduction with no residual peritoneal disease (CC0) was achieved in 74 (74%) patients with interval debulking surgery and 124 (66.7%) patients with delayed interval debulking. Of those with residual disease, there were 26/88 (29.5%) patients in the interval debulking surgery group and 62/88 (70.5%) patients in the delayed debulking surgery group. Comparison of patients with delayed debulking-CC0 and interval debulking-CC0 showed no difference in progression-free survival (p=0.3) or overall survival (p=0.4), while significantly worse outcomes were observed in patients with interval debulking-CC1 (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). Specifically, patients with interval debulking-CC1 had an approximately 67% increased risk of disease progression (p=0.04; HR=2.01 (95% CI 1.04 to 4.18)) and a 69% higher risk of death than patients with delayed debulking-CC0 (p=0.03; HR=2.34 (95% CI 1.11 to 4.67)).

CONCLUSION

Increasing the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles does not worsen patient outcomes if complete resection is achieved. Nevertheless, additional prospective trials are necessary to establish the optimum number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles.

Timing of interval debulking surgery and postoperative chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the prognostic relevance of the time to interval debulking surgery (TTS) and the time to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

A retrospective real-word study included 658 patients with histologically confirmed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received NACT at seven tertiary hospitals in China from June 2008 to June 2020. TTS was defined as the time interval from the completion of NACT to the time of interval debulking surgery (IDS). TTC was defined as the time interval from the completion of NACT to the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PACT).

RESULTS

The median TTS and TTC were 25 (IQR, 20-29) and 40 (IQR, 33-49) days, respectively. Patients with TTS > 25 days were older (55 vs. 53 years, P = 0.012) and received more NACT cycles (median, 3 vs. 2, P = 0.002). Similar results were observed in patients with TTC > 40 days. In the multivariate analyses, TTS and TTC were not associated with PFS when stratified by median, quartile, or integrated as continuous variables (all P > 0.05). However, TTS and TTC were significantly associated with worse OS when stratified by median (P = 0.018 and 0.018, respectively), quartile (P = 0.169, 0.014, 0.027 and 0.012, 0.001, 0.033, respectively), or integrated as continuous variables (P = 0.018 and 0.011, respectively). Similarly, increasing TTS and TTC intervals were associated with a higher risk of death (P_trend = 0.016 and 0.031, respectively) but not with recurrence (P_trend = 0.103 and 0.381, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The delays of IDS and PACT after the completion of NACT have adverse impacts on OS but no impacts on PFS, which indicates that reducing delays of IDS and PACT might ameliorate the outcomes of ovarian cancer patients treated with NACT.

Does timing of treatment have an effect on survival in ovarian carcinoma?

Background and Purpose: Optimal cytoreduction (CRS) is the main treatment modality in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Inoperable OC at the time of diagnosis may become eligible for CRS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aimed to investigate the effect of the time between NACT-CRS and CRS-adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in OC patients. Materials and Methods: Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of sixty-nine patients with OC who underwent CRS after NACT between December 2009 and May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age was 61.1, and the median overall survival (OS) was 75.8 months. The median time from the end of NACT to CRS was 6.53 weeks, and the median time from CRS to initiation of adjuvant therapy was 4.8 weeks. The mean OS was 123.4 months in patients with a NACT-CRS interval of 6.53 weeks or less, and it was 61.6 months in patients above this period (p>0.05). The OS was 75.7 months in patients with an interval between CRS and adjuvant therapy of 4.8 weeks or less and 55.1 months compared to those with 4.8 weeks or more (p>0.05). Conclusion: It was shown numerically, although not statistically significant, that a long time between NACT and CRS and CRS-adjuvant therapy had a negative effect on OS.