Possible contribution of cytomegalovirus infection to the high risk of (recurrent) venous thrombosis after renal transplantation

Role of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation on the subsequent risk of atherosclerotic and thrombotic events

Background and aims

Whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases the risk of cardiovascular complications after kidney transplantation (KT) through different indirect effects remains controversial.

Methods

We analyzed the incidence of post-transplant atherosclerotic (PAEs) and thrombotic events (PTEs) in 465 KT recipients according to the previous exposure to any level or high-level (≥1,000 IU/mL) CMV viremia (either asymptomatic or clinical disease) by means of landmark analysis beyond days 30, 180 and 360 after transplantation. Proportional hazards models were constructed with death and graft loss as competing risks.

Results

After a median of 722 days, the cumulative incidences of PAE and PTE were 6.0% each. Most PAEs (53.6%) occurred beyond post-transplant day 360, whereas most PTEs (60.7%) were diagnosed between days 30-180.The incidence of PAE beyond day 180 was higher among patients with previous CMV viremia compared to those without (two-year rates: 4.7% versus 0.4%; P-value = 0.035). This difference was more pronounced in recipients developing high-level viremia (6.3% versus 0.7%, respectively; P-value = 0.013). After multivariate adjustment for age, pre-transplant cardiovascular risk, antiplatelet and statin therapy and graft function, however, associations were not maintained either for any-level (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-7.05) or high-level CMV viremia (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 0.78-10.36). No significant differences were found in the remaining landmark analyses (days 30 or 360) or for the outcome of PTE either.

Conclusions

Our study does not support that CMV infection independently contributes to the risk of PAE or PTE after KT.

Thrombosis Associated With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common infectious complication after kidney transplantation. Indirect effects of CMV infection include an increased risk of secondary infections, increased risk of acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction. However, it is not well known that CMV may also increase the risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Here, we present a case of acute deep venous thromboembolism associated with acute CMV disease in a kidney transplant recipient. We also performed a literature review of cytomegalovirus-associated thrombosis in immunocompromised individuals.

Donor Graft Cytomegalovirus Serostatus and the Risk of Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events in Seronegative Recipients After Non-Thoracic Solid Organ Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic pathogen, following solid organ transplantation (SOT), that leads to direct and indirect effects. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CMV exposure at transplantation on the rate of posttransplant thrombotic events (TEs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients transplanted at the University of Alberta Hospital between July 2005 and January 2018. We included adult SOT CMV-seronegative recipients at transplantation who received an allograft from either a seropositive donor (D+/R-) or a seronegative donor (D-/R-).

RESULTS

A total of 392 SOT recipients were included: 151 (39%) liver, 188 (48%) kidney, 45 (11%) pancreas, and 8 (2%) other transplants. The mean age was 47 years, 297 (76%) were males, and 181 (46%) had a CMV D+/R- donor. Patients in the CMV D+/R- cohort were slightly older (51 years versus 48 years in the D-/R- cohort; P = .036), while other variables, including cardiovascular risk factors and pretransplant TEs, were not different between groups. Overall, TEs occurred in 35 (19%) patients in the CMV D+/R- group, versus 21 (10%) in the CMV D-/R- group, at 5 years of follow-up (P = .008); the incidence rates per 100 transplant months were 5.12 and 1.02 in the CMV D+/R- and CMV D-/R- groups, respectively (P = .003). After adjusting for potential confounders with a Cox regression model, a CMV D+/R- transplantation was independently associated with an increased risk of a TE over 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.027; 95% confidence interval, 1.669-5.488).

CONCLUSIONS

A CMV D+/R- transplantation is associated with an increased risk of a TE posttransplantation.

Venous Thrombosis Secondary to Acute Cytomegalovirus Infection in an Immunocompetent Host: Consideration for New Screening Guidelines

Serious thrombotic complications associated with an acute cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients are becoming increasingly recognized. While typically asymptomatic and self-limiting, an acute CMV infection appears to demonstrate a rare propensity for a vascular thrombosis, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), thrombophlebitis, and pulmonary embolism (PE). It remains unclear whether other predisposing factors play a role in its pathogenesis. We report the case of a young, immunocompetent male with extensive lower extremity DVT who was coincidentally found to be CMV-immunoglobulin M (IgM) seropositive. In light of the increasing prevalence of CMV-associated thrombotic events, we reviewed the current literature on its incidence, pathophysiology, clinical features, and thrombophilia screening to consider the possibility of CMV seropositivity as an independent risk factor for vascular events. This may have repercussions for screening guidelines and preventive strategies in those with active CMV infection.

Active CMV and EBV infections in renal transplant recipients with unexplained fever and elevated serum creatinine

Proper identification of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections are helpful for monitoring antiviral treatment in transplant recipients. Qualitative and quantitative CMV, EBV DNA PCR techniques in the context of serological tests are performed for early detection and differentiation of active and latent CMV and EBV infections in renal transplantation. Basically, 129 renal transplanted recipients monitored carefully and hospitalized for unexplained elevated creatinine levels or high fever and 21 of their donors were studied. CMV DNA was detected in 63.5% of the febrile episodes following transplantation and in 46.42% of readmitted patients using qualitative PCR method. In the first group, 15% of the patients and in the second group 42.85% of the patients had copy numbers more than cutoff point (900 copies/mL). Cutoff point had 100% sensitivity and 82.5% specificity for active and symptomatic CMV infection. Only 15.5% of the subjects were positive for EBV infection by qualitative PCR method. Among them 5% had >2000 copies/mL and were symptomatic. One subject with a history of three times hospitalization had higher EBV viral load and developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. CMV load was significantly correlated with elevated creatinine levels (OR = 3.1, p = 0.006), abnormal heart sounds (OR = 4.7; p = 0.02) and hypertension (OR = 3.6; p = 0.03). Only qRT-PCR could differentiate between latent and active infections and might be clinically useful for monitoring symptomatic CMV and EBV infections and initiation of the antiviral therapy. Elevated creatinine levels, hypertension, and abnormal heart sounds could be considered as main manifestations of HCMV infection in kidney recipients.

Thrombosis associated with acute cytomegalovirus infection: a narrative review

Thrombosis associated with acute cytomegalovirus infection has been reported many times in the literature since the mid 1980s - mainly in case reports and in small case series, but also in four controlled studies. Still, many physicians are unaware of this association although acute cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in a thrombosis patient may warrant antiviral therapy and may affect anticoagulation therapy duration. Accordingly, the clinical characteristics of patients with thrombosis and acute cytomegalovirus infection are reviewed, and the current knowledge concerning this unique association is presented herein. We believe it is time to add acute cytomegalovirus infection to the list of thrombosis triggers.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis following renal transplantation: a case report

Background

Recurrent episodes of venous thrombosis have been closely correlated with JAK2 V617F mutation. Upto date, JAK2 gene mutation has not been defined as a prothrombic risk factor in renal transplant recipients. Herein; we present a case of portosplenic vein thrombosis in a primary renal transplant recipient with JAK2 V617F mutation who had no history of prior venous thromboembolism or thrombophilia.

Case presentation

A 59 year old female caucasian patient with primary kidney transplant admitted with vague abdominal pain at left upper quadrant. Abdominal doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging angiography demonstrated splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). The final diagnosis was SVT due to MPD (essential thrombocytosis, ET) with JAK2 V617F mutation. After 3 months of treatment with warfarin (≥5 mg/day, to keep target INR values of 1.9-2.5), control MRI angiography and doppler USG demonstrated partial (>%50) resolution of thrombosis with recanalization of hepatopedal venous flow. The patient is still on the same treatment protocol without any complication.

Conclusion

JAK2 V617F mutation analysis should be a routine procedure in the diagnosis and treatment of kidney transplant patients with thrombosis in uncommon sites.

Review: Viral infections and mechanisms of thrombosis and bleeding

Viral infections are associated with coagulation disorders. All aspects of the coagulation cascade, primary hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis, can be affected. As a consequence, thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemorrhage, or both, may occur. Investigation of coagulation disorders as a consequence of different viral infections have not been performed uniformly. Common pathways are therefore not fully elucidated. In many severe viral infections there is no treatment other than supportive measures. A better understanding of the pathophysiology behind the association of viral infections and coagulation disorders is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies. This is of special importance in case of severe complications, such as those seen in hemorrhagic viral infections, the incidence of which is increasing worldwide. To date, only a few promising targets have been discovered, meaning the implementation in a clinical context is still hampered. This review discusses non‐hemorrhagic and hemorrhagic viruses for which sufficient data on the association with hemostasis and related clinical features is available. This will enable clinicians to interpret research data and place them into a perspective. J. Med. Virol. 84:1680–1696, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Infections and inflammatory diseases as risk factors for venous thrombosis. A systematic review

Inflammation and venous thrombosis are intertwined. Only in the recent 15 years clinical epidemiological studies have focussed on inflammatory or infectious diseases as risk factors for venous thrombosis. Although a few reviews and many case reports or studies on these topic has been written, a review reporting relative or absolute risks for venous thrombosis has not been published yet. We performed a systematic review using Medline, Pubmed and Embase and found 31 eligible articles. Inflammatory bowel disease, ANCA-associated vasculitis, infections in general and more specifically, human immunodeficiency virus, pneumonia and urinary tract infections are associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis.

Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with venous thromboembolism of immunocompetent adults--a case-control study

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seems to contribute to the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in immunocompromised patients whereas literature data on the role in immunocompetent individuals are mainly limited to case reports. This study aimed to investigate if cytomegalovirus infection contributes to the development of VTE in immunocompetent individuals. CMV-IgG and CMV-IgM antibody titres, CMV-IgG avidity and CMV-DNA were identified in samples from 166 VTE patients and from 166 healthy blood donors matched for gender and age. CMV-IgG antibodies were found more frequently in VTE patients compared to controls [57.8% vs. 44.0%; adjusted OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.13-2.70); p = 0.016]. Accordingly, median CMV-IgG titres were significantly higher in the case group (89.4 vs. 1.8 AU/ml; p = 0.002). Although the overall rate was low, CMV-IgM antibodies were detected more often among cases than controls. The difference was significant in patients with an unprovoked VTE event [7.4% vs. 0.6%; adjusted OR 5.26 (95% CI 1.35-20.8); p = 0.017]. CMV-IgG antibodies of almost all VTE patients (98.9%) and controls (98.6%) were found to be of high avidity. The rate of positive CMV-DNA samples was low and not different between cases and controls. With the exception of age, no association was found between CMV seropositivity and established VTE risk factors within the VTE group. CMV infection seems to play a role in the development of VTE in immunocompetent patients. Recurrent infection might be more important than acute CMV infection.