ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training

Videourodynamics - role, benefits and optimal practice

Videourodynamics (VUDS) is an advanced diagnostic procedure that simultaneously combines functional and anatomical evaluation of the lower urinary tract. The goal of this synchronous assessment is to promote accurate diagnosis of the aetiology responsible for patient symptoms, improving therapeutic decision-making. Overall, high-quality VUDS is advocated when other tests such as traditional urodynamics might not provide sufficient data to guide therapy, particularly in patients with complex, persistent or recurrent dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract. Additionally, VUDS is often crucial in the follow-up monitoring of many patients with these dysfunctions. A VUDS study is frequently considered a gold standard in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, female bladder outlet obstruction or congenital anomalies of the lower urinary tract. Nevertheless, this specialized test should be limited to patients in whom VUDS data add value. Particularly, reliable studies comparing the effect of diagnosis with and without imaging on management outcomes are lacking, and no standardized procedures for undertaking VUDS are available. Additionally, patients should be carefully selected for VUDS evaluation, considering the increased cost and risks associated with radiological imaging. In routine practice, clinicians should balance the additional value of synchronous imaging and the enhanced diagnostic precision of VUDS against the limitations of this approach, which mainly include an uncertain effect of VUDS on final treatment outcomes.

Radiation dose reduction during venous access port implantation: the importance of upgrading equipment and radiation-protection training

BACKGROUND

Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0 mGy.cm2 vs. 24.0 mGy.cm2, p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners.

Potential risk assessment: a model for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures

This study presented a model applied for potential risk assessment in an interventional radiology setting. The model of potential risk assessment (MARP) consisted of the creation of a scale of indicators ranging from 0 to 5. The radiation levels were categorized according to gender, kind of procedure, value of kerma air product (Pka), and accumulated radiation dose (mGy). The MARP model was applied in 121 institutions over 8 y. A total of 201 656 patient radiation doses (Dose-area product and accumulated kerma) data were launched into the system over time, with an average of 22 406 doses per year. In the context of the workers (cardiologists, radiographers, and nurses) monitored during the MARP application, 8007 cases (with an average of 890 per year) of occupational radiation doses were recorded. This study showed a strategy for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy using a model with a compulsory information system for monitoring safety.

A dual-centre study on the radioprotective effect of a novel X-ray protection device during coronary intervention

AIM

To investigate the shielding efficiency of a novel X-ray protection device (NPD) compared with the traditional lead clothing (TLC) during coronary intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed prospectively in two centres. A total of 200 coronary interventions were included and assigned equally into the NPD or TLC group. The NPD is a floor-standing X-ray protection device, which mainly composes of a barrel-like frame and two layers of lead rubber. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were adopted to detect the cumulative absorbed doses, and were attached outside the NPD or TLC or body of the first operator at four different height levels in four directions during the procedure.

RESULTS

The cumulative doses outside the NPD were comparable to that of the TLC (2,398.33 ± 2,341.64 versus 1,624.09 ± 1,732.20 μSv, p=0.366), and the cumulative doses inside the NPD were significantly lower than those inside the TLC (40 ± 0 versus 732.28 ± 919.83 μSv, p<0.001). As the TLC did not cover the calf segment of the operator, the area at 50 cm height from the floor in the TLC group was unshielded. The shielding efficiency of NPD was significantly higher than that of the TLC (98.2 ± 0.63% versus 52.11 ± 38.97%, p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

The NPD has a significantly higher shielding efficacy than that of the TLC, in particular, it protects the operators' lower limb, liberates their lower body from wearing heavy lead apron, and may consequently reduce the radiation or body-load associated complications.

Trial of a Novel Radiation Shielding Device to Protect Staff in the Cardiac Catheter Laboratory

Continuous exposure to low-level scattered radiation to staff performing cardiac angiography and intervention is of concern. A novel shielding solution (NSS) (Rampart IC M1128) has the potential to provide greater shielding for staff present at the table-side. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the NSS compared with a traditional shielding solution (TSS) in a randomized controlled trial that enrolled 100 patients who underwent cardiac angiography and/or intervention which were randomized to the NSS or TSS. Baseline patient characteristics and radiation dose data were collected. Staff who were scrubbed at the table-side wore 5 real-time dosimeters on the head, collar, waist, ankle, and under the apron. The median primary operator radiation dose was significantly lower (p <0.001) for all dosimeter locations with the NSS when compared with the TSS, being reduced by 86%, 80.0%, 100%, and 50.0% for the head, collar, waist, and leg respectively. Median under-apron dose was 0.0 µSv for both NSS and TSS. Median second operator dose was reduced by 100%, 100%, and 100% for the head, collar, and waist respectively (p <0.001). Median NSS and TSS dose at the ankle and under apron was 0.0 µSv. Median scrub nurse dose was reduced by 50% and 100% for the head and collar respectively (p <0.001). Median NSS and TSS dose at the waist, ankle, and under apron was 0.0 µSv. In conclusion, the NSS tested in this study demonstrates a significant decrease in radiation dose to operators and scrub nurses when compared with traditional radiation protection measures.

Therapeutic targets and signaling mechanisms of dasatinib activity against radiation skin ulcer

Objective

To reveal the potential targets and signaling pathways of dasatinib in the treatment of radiation ulcers through network pharmacology and molecular docking technology.

Methods

Pathological targets of radiation ulcers were screened using GeneCards database. At the same time, the pharmacological targets of dasatinib were obtained through SwissTargetPrediction (STP), Binding DB and Drugbank databases. Subsequently, the potential targets of dasatinib for anti-radiation ulcers were obtained after intersection by Venn diagram. Next, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed through the STRING database and core targets were screened. Finally, the identified core targets were subjected to GO and KEGG enrichment analysis, co-expression network analysis, and molecular docking technology to verify the reliability of the core targets.

Results

A total of 76 potential targets for anti-radiation ulcer with dasatinib were obtained, and 6 core targets were screened, including EGFR, ERBB2, FYN, JAK2, KIT, and SRC. These genes were mainly enriched in Adherens junction, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, Focal adhesion, Bladder cancer and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Molecular docking results showed that dasatinib binds well to the core target.

Conclusion

Dasatinib may play a role in the treatment of radiation ulcers by regulating EGFR, ERBB2, FYN, JAK2, KIT, and SRC. These core targets may provide new insights for follow-up studies of radiation ulcers.

Randomized comparison of atrioventricular node re-entry tachycardia and atrial flutter catheter ablation with and without fluoroscopic guidance: ZeroFluoro study

AIMS

Interventional cardiology procedures may expose patients and staff to considerable radiation doses. We aimed to assess whether exposure to ionizing radiation during catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) can be completely avoided.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective randomized study, patients with SVT (atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia n = 94, typical atrial flutter n = 29) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to catheter ablation with conventional fluoroscopic guidance (CF group) or with the EnSite Precision mapping system [zerofluoro (ZF) group]. Acute procedural parameters, increased stochastic risk of cancer incidence and 6-month follow-up data were assessed. Between May 2019 and August 2020, 123 patients were enrolled. Clinical parameters were comparable. Median procedural time was 60.0 and 58.0 min, median fluoroscopy time and estimated median effective dose were 240 s vs. 0 and 0.38 mSv vs. 0 and arrhythmia recurrence was 5% and 7.9% in the CF and ZF groups, respectively. The acute success rate was 98.4% in both groups. No procedure-related complications were reported. At an average age of 55.5 years and median radiation exposure of 0.38 mSv, the estimate of increased incidence was approximately 1 in 14 084. The estimated mortality rate was 1 per 17 857 exposed persons.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedural safety and efficacy of the zero-fluoroscopic approach are similar to those of conventional fluoroscopy-based ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and atrial flutter. Under the assumption of low radiation dose, the excessive lifetime risk of malignancy in the CF group due to electrophysiology procedure is reasonably small, whilst totally reduced in zero fluoroscopy procedures.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Associated With Infertility Treatment

Assisted conception involving hormonals is a risk factor for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), and pregnant women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection are more likely to have had treatment for subfertility. Increasingly, there is a risk of maternal death in women after assisted conception, and so, the need to assess the cardiovascular sequelae after assisted conception is imperative. This is an illustrative case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection shortly after a repeat cycle of in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

The aetiology of spontaneous coronary artery dissection is believed to be multi-factorial, affecting mostly young women, a population similar to women requiring assisted conception. The oestrogen and progesterone used in in vitro fertilisation are believed to trigger structural weakening in the coronary blood vessels, leading to vascular rupture. Repeat in vitro fertilisation cycles and successful conception are thought to increase spontaneous coronary artery dissection risk by increasing hormonal exposure.

The management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection is dependent on if pregnancy has been achieved or not, and a multi-disciplinary approach to its management is essential.

More research is needed to identify women at higher risk of this life-threatening event.

Impact of Simulation-Based Training on Radiation Exposure of Young Interventional Cardiologists

Reducing radiation exposure during cardiovascular catheterization is of paramount importance to ensure patient and staff safety. Our study aimed to assess the transferability of acquired skills from virtual reality to the real world, including radioprotection measures during mentored simulation training (ST) in coronary angiography. A total of 10 cardiology residents were evaluated during real-life cases in the catheterization laboratory before (group A) and after mentored ST. The educational effect of mentored simulator training on real-life case performance was evaluated at 2 different time points: within the first week (group B) and after 12 weeks (group C). Compared with group A, the total dose area product (DAP) (µGy•m²) and total air kerma (mGy) were lower after ST: group A: 2,633 (1,723 to 3,617) versus group B: 1,618 (1,032 to 2,562), p <0.05 and 214 (136 to 297) versus 135 (84 to 222), p <0.05, respectively. Concerning operator radiation exposure (µSv), left finger dose: 1,090 (820 to 1,460) versus 635 (300 to 900), p = 0.028; left leg dose 80 (0 to 110) versus 0 (0 to 0), p = 0.027; left eye lens dose: 39 (24 to 69) versus 11 (8 to 20), p <0.0001; and chest dose outside the lead apron: 50 (34 to 88) versus 29 (21 to 50), p <0.003 were significantly lower in the group B than group A. A total of 12 weeks after ST, the total DAP and total air kerma remained stable along with operator exposure except left eye lens dose (µSv): group B: 11 (8 to 20) versus group C: 16 (12 to 27), p = 0.02. In addition, left eye lens dose, left wrist dose, and chest dose outside the lead apron were significantly correlated with total DAP (rs = 0.635, rs = 0.729, and rs = 0, 629, respectively) and total air kerma (rs = 0.488, rs = 0.514, and rs = 0.548, respectively) at 12 weeks. In conclusion, ST for coronary angiography may improve radioprotection learning and should be incorporated into training curricula.

A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Although a growing amount of literature that suggests robots are safe and can achieve comparable outcomes to conventional techniques, much of this literature is limited by small sample sizes and single-surgeon or single center series. Furthermore, it is unclear what the impact of robotic technology has made on operative and clinical outcomes over time. This is the first and largest multicenter study to examine the trends in outcomes and complications after robot-assisted spine surgery over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent spine surgery with robot-assistance between 2015 and 2019 at four unique spine centers. The robotic systems used included the Mazor Renaissance, Mazor X, and Mazor Stealth Edition. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from this study. The minimum follow-up was 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 722 adult patients were included (117 Renaissance, 477 X, 128 Stealth). Most patient and operative factors (e.g., sex, tobacco status, total instrumented levels, and pelvic fixation,) were similar across the years. Mean ± standard deviation Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 1.5±1.5. The most commonly reported diagnoses included high grade spondylolisthesis (40.6%), degenerative disc disease (18.4%), and degenerative scoliosis (17.6%). Mean (standard deviation) number of instrumented levels was 3.8±3.4. From 2015 to 2019, average robot time per screw improved from 7.2 to 5.5 minutes (P=0.004, R²=0.649). Average fluoroscopy time per screw improved from 15.2 to 9.4 seconds (P=0.002). Rates of both intraoperative screw exchange for misplaced screw (2015-2016: 2.7%, 2019: 0.8%, P=0.0115, R²=0.1316) and robot abandonment (2015-2016: 7.1%, 2019: 1.1%, P=0.011, R²=0.215) improved significantly over time. The incidence of other intraoperative complications (e.g., dural tear, loss of motor/sensory function, blood transfusion) remained consistently low, but similar throughout the years. The length of stay (LOS) decreased by nearly 1 day from 2015 to 2019 (P=0.007, R²=0.779). 90-day reoperation rates did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

At four institutions among seven surgeons, we demonstrate robot screw accuracy, reliability, operative efficiency, and radiation exposure improved significantly from 2015 to 2019. 90-day complication rates remained low and LOS decreased significantly with time. These findings further validate continued usage of robot-assisted spine surgery and the path toward improved value-based care.

Zero-Fluoroscopy Cardiac Ablation: Technology Is Moving Forward in Complex Procedures—A Novel Workflow for Atrial Fibrillation

Simple Summary

Electrophysiological procedures are mainly performed using fluoroscopy, exposing both healthcare staff and patients to a non-negligible dose of radiation. To date, simple ablation procedures have often been approached with zero fluoroscopy. In complex ablation procedures, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, zero fluoroscopy is still challenging mainly because of transseptal puncture. We report a workflow to perform a complete zero-fluoroscopy AF ablation using a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system, intracardiac echocardiography and a novel steerable guiding sheath visible on the mapping system. We describe two cases, one with paroxysmal AF and the other with persistent AF during which this novel workflow was successfully applied with complete zero-fluoroscopy exposure and achieving pulmonary vein isolation.

Abstract

Background and Rationale. A fluoroscopy-based approach to an electrophysiological procedure is widely validated and has been recognized as the gold standard for a long time. The use of fluoroscopy exposes both the healthcare staff and the patient to a non-negligible dose of radiation. To minimize the risks associated with the use of fluoroscopy, it would be reasonable to perform ablation procedures with zero fluoroscopy. This approach is widely used in simple ablation procedures, but not in complex procedures. In atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures, fluoroscopy remains the main technology used, in particular to guide the transseptal puncture. Main results and Implications. We present a workflow to perform a complete zero-fluoroscopy ablation for AF ablation procedures using a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system, intracardiac echocardiography and a novel steerable guiding sheath that can be visualized on the mapping system. We present two cases, one with paroxysmal AF and the other one with persistent AF during which we applied this novel workflow achieving a successful pulmonary vein isolation without complications and complete zero-fluoroscopy exposure.

Comparison of patient and staff temple dose during fluoroscopically guided coronary angiography, implantable cardiac devices, and electrophysiology procedures

There is a paucity of literature comparing patient and staff dose during coronary angiography (CA), implantable cardiac devices, permanent pacemakers (PPM) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures and little noting dose to staff other than cardiologists. This study sought to compare patient and occupational dose during a range of fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures. Radiation dose levels for the patients (n = 1651), cardiologists (n = 24), scrub (n = 32) and scout nurses (n = 35) were measured in a prospective single-centre study between February 2017 and August 2019. A comparison of dose during CA, device implantation, PPM insertion and EP studies was performed. Three angiographic units were used, with dosimeters worn on the temple of staff. Results indicated that occupational dose during PPM was significantly higher than other procedures. The cardiologist had the highest mean dose during biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; levels were approximately five times that of 'normal' pacemaker insertions. Transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) were associated with relatively high mean doses for both staff and patients and had a statistically significant higher (>2 times) mean patient dose area product than all other categories. TAVI workups were also related to higher mean cardiologist and scrub nurse dose. It was observed that the mean scrub nurse dose can exceed that of the cardiologist. The highest mean dose for Scout nurses were recorded during EP studies. Given the significantly higher temple dose associated with PPM insertion, cardiologists should consider utilizing ceiling mounted lead shields, lead glasses and/or skull caps where possible. Efforts should also be made to minimize the use of DSA during TAVI and TAVI workups to reduce cardiologist, nurse and patient dose.

Impact of Patient BMI on Patient and Operator Radiation Dose During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

AIMS

This study sought to investigate patient and operator radiation dose in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the impact of body mass index (BMI) on patient and operator dose.

METHODS

In patients undergoing PCI, radiation dose parameters, baseline characteristics and procedural data were collected in a tertiary centre for 3.5 years. Operators wore real time dosimeters. Patients were grouped by BMI. Dose area product (DAP) and operator radiation dose were compared across patient BMI categories. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the impact of patient BMI and other procedural variables on patient and operator dose.

RESULTS

2,043 patients underwent 2,197 PCI procedures. Each five-unit increase in BMI increased patient dose (expressed as DAP) by an average 31% (95% CI: 29-33%) and operator dose by 27% (95% CI: 20-33%). Patient dose was 2.3 times higher and operator dose was 2.4 times higher in patients with a BMI>40 than for normal BMI patients. Multivariable analysis indicated that there were many procedural factors that were predictors for increasing operator dose and patient dose but that patient BMI was a major contributor for both operator dose and patient dose.

CONCLUSION

Increasing BMI increases the DAP and operator dose for PCI procedures and BMI is demonstrated to be a major factor that contributes to both patient and operator radiation dose.

INCREASED EXPOSURE TO X-RAYS DURING CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE MEASUREMENT AND ENDOCORONARY IMAGING TECHNIQUES

Growing use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intracoronary imaging techniques by optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound has raised concerns about additional exposure during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Using data from the prospective CRAC-France PCI Prospective Multicentre registry, we sought to evaluate the effect of these new techniques on the radiation dose to patients undergoing coronary procedures. Data on Kerma Area Product (PKA), total air kerma (KAr) and fluoroscopy time from 42 182 coronary procedures were retrospectively compared, using multivariable linear regression, according to whether they included FFR and intracoronary imaging. In coronary angiography, FFR was associated with longer fluoroscopy time and higher PKA (21.0 vs. 18.9 Gy.cm2) and KAr (372 vs. 299 mGy) (all p < 0.001). Intracoronary imaging was associated with longer fluoroscopy time, higher contrast volume (both p < 0.001), lower PKA (18.3 vs. 19.0 Gy.cm2, p = 0.02) and similar KAr. In PCI, FFR was associated with a moderate increase in KAr (682 vs. 626 mGy, p < 0.01) but not PKA (35.9 vs. 33.7 Gy.cm2, p = 0.34). For intracoronary imaging, there were no differences between groups, except for contrast volume. Increased patient exposure associated with FFR and intracoronary imaging is moderate in diagnostic coronary angiography and minimal or none in PCI, provided optimization techniques are used. It should not be a limitation on the use of these techniques given the important additional information they provide.

Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Interventional cardiovascular medicine has seen constant progress over the last few decades. Since the first angiograms and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were carried out, this progress has been tremendous and has led to a substantial decline in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to report and review the latest developments and evidence in robotics-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (rPCI) and its potential future applications, opportunities, and limitations. Contemporary evidence shows that rPCI can lead to a significant reduction in radiation exposure as well as medical hazards for cardiologists. Rates of device and procedural success remain high and there is no evidence of a disadvantage for the patient. The accuracy of implantation with a reduced geographic mismatch is a further advantage that can result in a higher quality of treatment. Even in complex coronary lesions and procedures, rPCI seems to be safe and efficient. The latest developments include telestenting over hundreds of kilometers from a remote platform. Currently, the main limitations are the absence of large-scale randomized trials for the valid assessment of the benefits and disadvantages of rPCI as well as the technical limitations of the currently available rPCI systems. rPCI is a forward-looking innovation in cardiology that is applicable to a wide range of coronary interventions. Despite the present lack of knowledge and the limited data concerning the outcome for the patient, the available literature reveals promising results that should lead to improvements for physicians and patients.

Radiation awareness in an Italian multispecialist sample assessed with a web-based survey

INTRODUCTION

The awareness of radiation doses and risks, also during interventional cardiology procedures, is essential today in order to apply the risk-benefit assessment and to reinforce the principles of justification and optimisation in clinical practice.

METHODS

A voluntary survey with 10 questions and multiple-choice answers was run on a popular cardiology website (www.cardiolink.it) independently by a scientific publisher, in order to evaluate the contemporary level of radiation awareness in a multi-speciality sample of physicians in Italy.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred and sixty-one physicians completed the test. The survey showed good results since both prescribers and practitioners (mostly cardiologists) working in Italy are largely aware of the cancer and non-cancer risks of medical radiation use, regardless of their subspecialty background.

CONCLUSION

Physicians are largely aware of the cancer and non-cancer risks of medical radiation use, regardless of their subspecialty background. However, there is still broad space for improvement; in the future, the awareness of radiation risk is a prerequisite to create a culture of respect for radiation hazard and a commitment to minimise exposure and maximise protection.

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) estimated retrospectively by conventional radiation saving X-ray angiography

BACKGROUND

Angiography derived FFR reveals good performance in assessing intermediate coronary stenosis. However, its performance under contemporary low X-ray frame and pulse rate settings is unknown. We aim to validate the feasibility and performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) under such angiograms.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, single center cohort study. 134 vessels in 102 patients, with angiograms acquired under 7.5fps and 7pps mode, were enrolled. QFR (fQFR and cQFR) and vFFR were validated with FFR as the gold standard. A conventional manual and a newly developed algorithmic exclusion method (M and A group) were both evaluated for identification of poor-quality angiograms.

RESULTS

Good agreement between QFR/vFFR and FFR were observed in both M and A group, except for vFFR in the M group. The correlation coefficients between fQFR/cQFR/vFFR and FFR were 0.6242, 0.5888, 0.4089 in the M group, with rvFFR significantly lower than rfQFR (p = 0.0303), and 0.7055, 0.6793, 0.5664 in the A group, respectively. AUCs of detecting lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80 were 0.852 (95% CI 0.722-0.913), 0.858 (95% CI 0.778-0.917), 0.682 (95% CI 0.586-0.768), for fQFR/cQFR/vFFR in the M group, while vFFR performed poorer than fQFR (p = 0.0063) and cQFR (p = 0.0054). AUCs were 0.898 (95% CI 0.811-0.945), 0.892 (95% CI 0.803-0.949), 0.843 (95% CI 0.746-0.914) for fQFR/cQFR/vFFR in the A group. AUCvFFR was significantly higher in the A group than that in the M group (p = 0.0399).

CONCLUSIONS

QFR/vFFR assessment is feasible under 7.5fps and 7pps angiography, where cQFR showed no advantage compared to fQFR. Our newly developed algorithmic exclusion method could be a better method of selecting angiograms with adequate quality for angiography derived FFR assessment.

Radiation Exposure Reduction and Patient Outcome by Using Very Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy Protocol (3.8 + 7.5 fps) During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objectives: In this study, we intend to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of very low frame rate fluoroscopy (VLFF) protocol using a combination of 3.8 and 7.5 fps while performing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

Methods: A retrospective cohort including 193 patients undergoing PCI under the VLFF protocol (Post-VLFF group) was compared with a retrospective cohort of 133 patients, who underwent PCI prior to implementation of VLFF protocol (Pre-VLFF group). In the Pre-VLFF group, all PCIs were performed using fluoroscopy frame rate of 15 fps. In the Post-VLFF group, 3.8 fps was used to guide catheter engagement, coronary lesion wiring, pre-and post-dilation, and 7.5 fps was used for lesion assessment and stent placement. Increasing use of fluoroscopic storage in place of cineangiography was also encouraged. Cine acquisition in both groups was performed at 15 fps. Primary endpoint was radiation exposure measured by Air Kerma. Secondary endpoints were procedure related outcomes and patient related outcomes (Major Adverse Cardiac Events including all-cause mortality, Target Lesion Failure, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke).

RESULTS: Post-VLFF group showed 74.7% reduction in Air Kerma as compared to Pre-VLFF group (433 ± 27 mGy vs. 1,714 ± 140 mGy; p < 0.0001), with no increase in the fluoroscopy time (15.38 ± 0.98 min Post-VLFF vs. 17.06 ± 1.29 min Pre-VLFF; p = 0.529) and contrast volume (116.5 ± 4.9 ml Post-VLFF vs. 116.7 ± 6 ml Pre-VLFF; p = 0.700). Both groups had comparable procedural success and complications rates as well as incidence of MACE.

Conclusions: The very low frame rate fluoroscopy protocol is a feasible, effective, and safe method to significantly reduce the radiation exposure during PCI without any compromise on procedural and patient outcomes.

Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping guided procedures

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopic imaging involves exposure of the patients and the laboratory staff to ionizing radiation. One of the strategies that reduce such exposure in an electrophysiology laboratory is using a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D EAM) system for performing these procedures. In this analysis, we have analyzed the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on the radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all the ablation procedures performed under 3D EAM guidance at our institute from September 2015 to December 2018. The procedures were divided into two groups based on whether the procedures were performed before (pre) or after (post) January 26, 2018. After January 2018, fluoroscopy was used at a frame rate of 3.75 frames per second (fps). Radiation exposure indices and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ablation procedures included in the analysis were ventricular arrhythmias (n = 192), atrial flutter (115), atrial tachycardia (AT) (43), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (30). Over the study period, there was a significant reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose (ED) (P < .001). Except for AT and AF ablation procedures, there was a significant reduction in the radiation exposure indices when the "post" group was compared with the "pre" group (P ≤ .02). The decrease in the frame rate had no significant effect on in-hospital outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3D EAM combined with decreasing the fluoroscopy frame rate significantly reduced the total radiation exposure without adversely affecting in-hospital outcomes.

Health Care System-Wide Analysis Identifies High Radiation Use Factors and Behaviors in Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Usage of radiation among various surgical specialists has not been comprehensively evaluated. A systems-based analysis evaluating intraoperative radiation can help identify high use factors and dose reduction behaviors leading to quality improvement initiatives.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all operative fluoroscopic-guided procedures from 2010 to 2017 from 4 hospitals in a tertiary academic health care system was performed.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred fifty-two cases were analyzed, and notable trends in metrics including type of equipment, procedures, surgical field, surgical specialty, and dose reduction techniques were demonstrated. Higher radiation exposures were correlated with fixed vs. mobile C-arm usage (1229 mGy vs. 331 mGy, P = .001), abdominal/pelvic procedures (429.2 mGy vs. 274.0 mGy, P = .002), and embolization (2450.6 mGy vs. 328.2 mGy, P = .019). Vascular surgery averaged 40 times higher radiation exposure per patient than other specialties (613.3 mGy vs. 15.6 mGy, P = .001). Notably, vascular surgeons utilized dose reduction techniques less frequently than urology (21.5% vs. 70%, P = .001) but more than neurosurgery and orthopedics (21.5% vs. 1.3% and 0%, P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A system-wide health care analysis identified vascular surgery procedures, use of a fixed C-arm, abdominal/pelvic procedures, and embolization cases as having the highest radiation exposure. These data can serve as baseline information for future quality improvement initiatives regarding fluoroscopy usage by surgeons.

A New Era in Zero X-ray Ablation

In this article, the authors focus on the importance of the zero X-ray ablation approach in electrophysiology. Radiation exposure related to conventional transcatheter ablation carries small but non-negligible stochastic and deterministic effects on health. Non-fluoroscopic mapping systems can significantly reduce, or even completely avoid, radiological exposure. The zero X-ray approach determines potential clinical benefits in terms of reduction of ionising radiation exposure, as well as safe technical advantages. The use of this method can result in similar outcomes when compared to the conventional fluoroscopic technique. These results are achieved without altering the duration, or compromising the effectiveness and safety, of the procedure. The zero X-ray ablation approach is a feasible and safe alternative to fluoroscopy, which is often only used in selected cases for troubleshooting. The non-fluoroscopic approach is considered a milestone for cancer prevention in ablation procedures.

Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Disease: A Brief Review of Risk Assessment and Management

Cardiac disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. An increased prevalence of the cardiovascular disease has been found in women of childbearing age, in which the responsibility of the treating physician extends to the mother and to the unborn fetus. As a result, care of these high-risk pregnant women with cardiovascular disease including those with congenital heart disease (CHD) require a team approach including specialists in maternal-fetal medicine, adult congenital cardiology, and obstetrical anesthesia. The human body undergoes significant amounts of physiological changes during this period of time and the underlying cardiac disease can affect both the mother and the fetus. Today, most female children born with CHD will reach childbearing age. For many women with complex CHD, carrying a pregnancy has a moderate to high risk for both the mother and her fetus. This chapter will review the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation including common signs and symptoms, physiological changes in pregnancy, and the medical approach including cardiac medications, percutaneous interventions, and surgical procedures for pregnant women with CHD.

Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice

The technique of catheter ablation has been improved within the past few decades, especially by three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. 3D mapping system has reduced radiation exposure but ablation procedures still require fluoroscopy. Our previous study showed the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation based on intracardiac echogram combined with CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 system, however fluoroscopy use for an average of 16 min is required for this procedure. The present study was aimed to reduce radiation exposure to zero and establish a radiation free catheter ablation method with the goal of utilizing it in routine clinical practice. We conducted single center, retrospective study during 2019 April to 2020 February. Consecutive 76 patients were enrolled. In the first 18 cases, the previously reported procedure (CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 method) was used. The remaining 58 cases were transitioned to fluoroless catheter ablation. The procedure time, success rates and complication rates were analyzed. Not only AF patients but atrial flutter (AFL), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and ventricular arrhythmia patients were included. Catheter positioning, catheter visualization and collecting the geometry of each camber of the heart were conducted by using contact force and ICE based geometry on CARTO system without either prior computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI). In fluoroless group, all catheter ablations were successfully performed without lead aprons. No complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences in procedure time in any type of procedure (Total procedure time Fluoro-group; 149 ± 51 min vs. Fluoroless-group; 162 ± 43 min, N.S.), (PSVT 170 ± 53 min vs. 162 ± 29 min, N.S.), (AFL 110 ± 70 min vs. 123 ± 43 min, N.S.), (AF 162 ± 43 min vs. 163 ± 32 min, N.S.). The total radiation time was reduced to zero in fluoroless group. Catheter ablation with ICE and 3D mapping system guide without fluoroscopy could be safely performed with a high success rate, without any prior CT/MRI 3D images. Radiation was reduced completely for patients and staff, negating the need for protective wear for operators.

A randomized comparison of estimated radiation exposure between Low and conventional dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography (ERICA trial): Pilot study

PURPOSE

Radiation exposure during coronary angiography is potentially harmful to patients and operators. However, there are limited data on the effects of a low-dose radiation angiography. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a reduced radiation dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

One hundred three consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography were enrolled and randomized to low- or conventional dose protocols (LDP versus CDP). The LDP consists of 10 frames per second during fluoroscopy and half the radiation dose of CDP during cineangiography. Image quality was assessed using a Likert rating scale by an independent radiologist. The radiation dose was estimated with dose-area product (DAP) and air-kerma (AK).

RESULTS

Body weight and waist circumference are well correlated with the level of DAP and AK. Exposure time and total images and frame counts in cineangiography were similar in both groups. There was a marked reduction of the estimated radiation dose (DAP and AK) in the LDP group compared to the CDP group without significant compromise in image quality (total DAP: LDP 1980.1 ± 1163.7 vs. CDP 3434.2 ± 2188.1 μGym² p = 0.001; total AK: 279.6 ± 159.3 vs. 493.8 ± 280.6 mGy, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The LDP reduced the total estimated radiation dose compared to the CDP without a significant loss of diagnostic information. A LDP may be a viable strategy to protect patients and medical staff from the hazards of radiation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Primary operator radiation dose in the cardiac catheter laboratory

OBJECTIVES

Radiation from cardiac angiography procedures is harmful to patients and the staff performing them. This study sought to investigate operator radiation dose for a range of procedures and different operators in order to investigate trends and optimise dose.

METHODS

Real-time dosemeters (RTDs) were worn by operators for angiography procedures for 3 years. Dose-area product (DAP) and RTD were collected. RTD was normalised to DAP (RTD/DAP) to compare radiation dose and radiation protection measures. Comparisons were made across procedure categories and individual operators.

RESULTS

In 7626 procedures, median and 75th percentile levels were established for operator dose for 8 procedure categories. There was a significant difference in all operator dose measures and DAP across procedure categories (p<0.001). DAP, RTD, and RTD/DAP were significantly different across 22 individual operators (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DAP was significantly different across procedure categories and a higher RTD was seen with higher DAP. RTD/DAP can demonstrate radiation protection effectiveness and identified differences between procedures and individual operators with this measure. Procedures and individuals were identified where further optimisation of radiation protection measures may be beneficial. A reference level for operator dose can be created and audited against on a regular basis.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study demonstrates that operator dose can be easily and routinely measured on a case by case basis to investigate dose trends for different procedures. Normalising the operator dose to DAP demonstrates radiation protection effectiveness for the individual operator which can then be optimised as part of an ongoing audit program.

Reproductive outcomes and Y chromosome instability in radiation-exposed male workers in cardiac catheterization laboratory

Occupational radiation exposure may impact the reproductive outcome of male workers in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (cath Lab) who receive a dose of ~1-10 mSv/year. An increased copy number variation (CNV) in azoospermia factor region c (AZFc) of the Y chromosome is a marker of spermatogenic failure, previously associated with radiation exposure. This study sought to investigate the association between paternal exposure in the Cath Lab and adverse reproductive outcomes as well as to assess the induction of CNV in the AZFc region. In a case-control study, we enrolled 193 catheterization lab workers (Group I) and 164 age-matched unexposed controls (Group II). Reproductive outcomes were assessed through a structured questionnaire. Two sequence-tagged sites (SY1197 and SY579) in AZFc region were evaluated by qRT-PCR in 83 exposed and 47 unexposed subjects. Exposed workers had a higher prevalence of low birth weight in offspring (Group I = 13% vs. II = 5.3%, P = 0.02; OR_adjusted = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.1-6.3; P = 0.02). The mean of CNV (microdeletion and microduplication) for SY1197 was significantly higher in the exposed workers (Group I = 1.53 ± 0.85 vs. Group II = 1.02 ± 0.41; P = 0.0005). Despite the study design limitations, our findings show that chronic occupational radiation exposure of male workers is correlated with higher prevalence of low birth weight in offspring and instability in the Y chromosome AZFc region. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:361-368, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Is Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Radiation Dose Reduction Achievable in a Population with 100% Suspected Coronary Artery Disease? A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown a reduction in radiation dose and contrast volume using dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA), but this has not been replicated in a population with 100% coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVE

To find if DARCA dose reduction is achievable in this population, we sought to compare the radiation dose, contrast volume, and procedure time between DARCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) techniques in a setting characterized by a prevalence of 100% suspected coronary artery disease.

METHODS

An all-comer, prospective, randomized, open-label trial was conducted. Cine acquisition dose-area product (DAP), cumulative air kerma (AK), effective dose (E), fluoroscopic time, contrast volume, AK, cine acquisition DAP (CADAP), fluoroscopic DAP (F-DAP), and total DAP were compared between DARCA and CCA groups.

RESULTS

We included 503 consecutive patients with suspected CAD. 252 were assigned to DARCA and 251 to CCA. Stable coronary artery disease was reported in 465 cases and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in 38. Mean age: 61.88 ± 11.2 years, male gender 70.2%. DARCA arm patients showed lower total E dose (6.85 [4.55-10.83] vs. 7.91 [5.58-11.94] Sv; P = .0023), and cine E (3.00 [2.00-4.00] vs. 4.00 [3.00-5.00] Sv; P < .0001). Total DAP was also lower (40.3 [26.8-63.7] vs. 46.5 [32.8-70.2] Gycm²; P = .0023), as a consequence of a lower CADAP (16.3 [10.5-22.9] vs. 23.4 [17.4-32.0] Gycm²; P < .0001), with lower AK (367 [248-1497] vs. 497 [381-1827] mGy; P < .0001), with less contrast medium used (90 [60.0-106.0] vs. 100 [75.0-120.0] mL; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

In a population with 100% suspected coronary artery disease, DARCA provides accurate information required in CAD, is safe, and results in a significant decrease in contrast material volume and radiation dose compared with CCA. The required extra projections did not neutralize the DARCA radiation dose and contrast volume reduction achievements.

Achieving contrast-free ultra-low radiation exposure without compromising safety and acute efficacy through evolving AF cryoballoon ablation procedure techniques

INTRODUCTION

In general, early experience with the first-generation cryoballoon introduced an increase in radiation exposure as compared to traditional radiofrequency ablations for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, through operator vigilance and the incorporation of various techniques and technologies, procedural radiation exposure can be managed to an exceptionally low level while maintaining the safety and efficacy of the cryoballoon procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective chart review of all consecutive AF ablation procedures performed by a single operator at a single high-volume center with the second-generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance) was performed between 2014 and 2017. Procedural and radiation exposure data were collected and analyzed year-over-year. 307 cases were reviewed with the majority as index procedures (95%) and patients presenting in paroxysmal AF (87%). The observed median absorbed dose was 2.4 mGy (interquartile range (IQR) = 1.0,6.2) and decreased significantly from 6.7 mGy (IQR = 1.6,6.2) in 2014 to 2.0 mGy (IQR = 1.5,4.5) in 2017 (P < 0.001). Median fluoroscopy time was 0.4 min (IQR = 0.25,0.75) and demonstrated reductions from 0.75 min (IQR = 0.40,1.4) in 2014 to 0.20 min (IQR = 0.10,0.40) in 2017 (P < 0.001). No radiopaque contrast agent was used in any procedure. A complication rate of 2% (6 total events) was observed, and no cases resulted in stroke, death, permanent phrenic nerve injury, or pulmonary vein stenosis. In total, 304 of 307 (99%) procedures resulted in complete isolation of all pulmonary veins.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-low radiation doses and contrast-free procedures can be achieved as part of an overall "safety-first" approach during cryoballoon AF ablation without compromising safety or acute efficacy.

IMPACT OF PELVIC AND RAD-BOARD LEAD SHIELDS ON OPERATOR AND PATIENT RADIATION DOSE IN TRANS-RADIAL CORONARY PROCEDURES

BACKGROUND

Trans-radial approach for cardiac catheterisation procedures has long been associated with high operator and patient radiation dose. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of pelvic and radial shields on decreasing coronary procedure radiation doses.

METHODS

A total of 418 patients randomly underwent diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac procedures with and without the pelvic and rad-board lead shields during the procedures. The operator and patient doses were then determined by means of a personal dosimeter and dose area product (DAP), respectively.

RESULTS

The shields decreased the operator radiation dose by 40% in coronary angiography (CA) and by 45% during angioplasty (PCI). These results were achieved at the cost of increased patient radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic lead shields combined with rad-board shields are highly effective in reducing operator radiation dose in trans-radial approach, but it is only achieved at the cost of increased patient DAP.

An Economic Analysis of the Systematic Use of Mapping Systems during Catheter Ablation Procedures: Single Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

In this study we estimated the cost-effectiveness of adopting 3D Nonfluoroscopic Mapping Systems (NMSs) for catheter ablation (CA).

METHODS

This study includes patients who underwent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) CA and atrial fibrillation (AF) CA from 2007 to 2016. A comparison was conducted between a reference year (2007) and the respective years for the two types of procedure in which the maximum optimization of patients' exposure using NMSs was obtained. We compared the data of all SVT CA performed solely using fluoroscopy in 2007 (Group I) and all SVT CA procedures performed using fluoroscopy together with an NMS in 2011 (Group II). There was also an important comparison made between AF CA procedures performed in 2007 (Group III) and AF CA in 2012 (Group IV), where patients' treatment in both years included the use of an NMS but where the software and hardware versions of the NMS were different. Two cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out. The first method was based on the alpha value (AV): the AV is a monetary reference value of avoided unit of exposure and is expressed as $/mansievert. The second one was based on the value of a statistical life (VSL): the VSL does not represent the cost value of a person's life, but the amount that a community would be willing to pay to reduce the risk of a person's death. The costs estimated from these two methods were compared to the real additional cost of using an NMS during that type of procedure in our EP Lab.

RESULTS

The use of NMS reduced the effective dose of about 2.3 mSv for SVT and 23.8 mSv for AF CA procedures. The use of NMS, applying directly AV or VSL values, was not cost-effective for SVT CA for the most countries, whereas the use of an NMS during an AF CA seemed to be cost-effective for most of them.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis the cost-effectiveness of the systematic use of NMSs strongly depended on the AV and VSL values considered. Nonetheless, the approach seemed to be cost-effective only during AF CA procedures.

Extensive Use of 3D Nonfluoroscopic Mapping Systems for Reducing Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation Procedures: An Analysis of 10 Years of Activity

Purpose

3D nonfluoroscopic mapping systems (NMSs) are generally used in the catheter ablation (CA) of complex ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term effect of the extended, routine use of NMSs for CA.

Methods

Our study involved 1028 patients who underwent CA procedures from 2007 to 2016. Initially, CA procedures were performed mainly with the aid of fluoroscopy. From October 2008, NMSs were used for all procedures.

Results

The median fluoroscopy time of the overall CA procedures fell by 71%: from 29.2 min in 2007 to 8.4 min in 2016. Over the same period, total X-ray exposure decreased by 65%: from 58.18 Gy⁎cm² to 20.19 Gy⁎cm². This reduction was achieved without prolonging the total procedure time. In AF CA procedures, the median fluoroscopy time fell by 85%, with an 86% reduction in total X-ray exposure. In SVT CA procedures, the median fluoroscopy time fell by 93%, with a 92% reduction in total X-ray exposure. At the end of the follow-up period, the estimated probability of disease-free survival was 67.7% at 12 months for AF CA procedures and 97.2% at 3 months for SVT CA, without any statistically significant difference between years.

Conclusions

Our study shows the feasibility of using NMSs as the main imaging modality to guide CA. The extended, routine use of NMSs dramatically reduces radiation exposure, with only slight fluctuations due to the process of acquiring experience on the part of untrained operators, without affecting disease-free survival.

Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) uses ionising radiation with relatively high doses, which impact on both patients and staff. This study sought to identify which patient and procedural factors impact patient and operator dose the most during CA.

METHODS

Patient and procedure related variables impacting on Kerma area product (PKA ) and operator dose (OD) were collected for 16 months. Procedures were separated into 10 different procedure categories. PKA was used for patient dose and OD was measured with an instantly downloadable dosimeter (IDD) - downloaded at the end of each procedure. High and low radiation dose was defined by binary variables based on the 75th percentile of the continuous measures. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to identify predictors.

RESULTS

Of 3860 patients included, the IDD was worn for 2591 (61.7%). Obesity (BMI > 30 compared to BMI < 25) was the strongest predictor for both a PKA (odds ratio (OR) = 19.1 (95% CI 13.5-26.9) P < 0.001) and OD (OR = 3.3 (2.4-4.4) P < 0.001) above the 75th percentile. Male gender, biplane imaging, the X-ray unit used, operator experience and procedure type also predicted a high PKA . Radial access, male gender, biplane imaging and procedure type also predicted a high OD.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose during CA is multifactorial and is dependent on patient and procedure related variables. Many factors impact on both PKA and OD but obesity is the strongest predictor for both patients and operators to receive a high radiation dose.

Fat volume measurements as a predictor of image noise in coronary computed tomography angiography

Introduction

Image noise can negatively affect the overall quality of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between image noise and fat volumes in the chest wall. We also aimed to compare these with other patient-specific predictors of image noise, such as body weight (BW) and body mass index (BMI).

Methods

We undertook a cross-sectional, single-center study. A tube voltage of 100 kV was used for patients with BW <85 kg and 120 kV for BW ≥85 kg. The image noise in the aortic root, single-slice fat volume (SFV) at the level of the left main coronary artery and the total fat volume of the chest (TFV) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 132 consecutive patients were enrolled (mean age ± standard deviation, 51 ± 11 years; 64% male). The mean image noise was 30.5 ± 11 Hounsfield units (HU). We found that patients with image noise >30 HU had significantly higher SFV (75 ± 33 vs. 51 ± 24, p < 0.0001) and TFV (2206 ± 927 vs. 1815 ± 737, p < 0.01) compared with patients having noise ≤30 HU, whereas BW and BMI showed no significant difference (78 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 14, p < 0.34) and (28.7 ± 4.7 vs. 26.8 ± 3.8, p < 0.19), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed that image noise has better correlation with SFV (R = 0.399; p < 0.0001); and TFV (R = 0, p < 0.009) than BMI (R = 0.154, p < 0.039) and BW (R = -0.102, p = 0.12).

Conclusions

Fat volume measurements of the chest wall can predict CCTA image noise better than other patient-specific predictors, such as BW and BMI.

A Cost-Effective Analysis of Systematically Using Mapping Systems During Catheter Ablation Procedures in Children and Teenagers

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an extended use of 3D non-fluoroscopic mapping systems (NMSs) during paediatric catheter ablation (CA) in an adult EP Lab. This study includes 58 consecutive patients (aged between 8 and 18) who underwent CA from March 2005 to February 2015. We compare the fluoroscopy data of two groups: group I, patients who underwent CA from 2005 to 2008 using only fluoroscopy, and group II, patients who underwent CA from 2008 to 2015 performed also using NMSs. Two cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out: the first method was based on the alpha value (AV), and the second one was based on the value of a statistical life (VSL). For both methods, a children's correction factor was also considered. The reduction cost estimated from all these methods was compared to the real additional cost of using NMSs. The use of an NMS during a CA procedure has led to an effective dose reduction (ΔE) of 2.8 milli-Sievert. All presented methods are based on parameters with a wide range of values. The use of an NMS, applying directly AV values or VSL values, is not cost-effective for most countries. Only considering the children's correction factor, the CA procedure using an NMS seems to be cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of a systematic use of NMSs during CA procedures in children and teenagers remains a challenging task. A positive result depends on which value of AV or VSL is considered and if the children's correction factor is applied or not.

Reduction of radiation exposure associated with renewal of the radiologic systems in coronary interventions

PURPOSE

Interventional coronary procedures are an important source of radiation. This study sought to evaluate the effect of the renewal of the radiologic system on patient exposure during diagnostic coronary angiography (DCA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).

METHODS

DCA and PCIs were obtained from three centres, which renewed their radiologic systems during their participation in the multicentre prospective observational RAY'ACT-2 study. Data were analysed from the months before and after the radiologic system was changed. The primary outcomes were the dose reduction estimated by the kerma.area product (KAP in Gy·cm²) and the ratio of the KAP to fluoroscopy time (Gy·cm²·min^-1).

RESULTS

A total of 2148 patients underwent DCA (1575 before and 573 after the system change), and 1563 underwent PCI (1196 before and 367 after). A change in the radiologic system was associated with a KAP reduction of 43% for DCA (median [interquartile range]: 18.1Gy·cm² [10.2-34.0] versus 31.5 [19.0-49.0], P<0.0001), and 38% for PCI (42.2Gy·cm² [23.8-81.7] versus 70.1 [42.0-109.0], P<0.0001). Fluoroscopy time did not vary significantly, and the ratio KAP to fluoroscopy time significantly decreased by 54%. The dose reduction was homogeneous between the three centres and between different manufacturer's systems.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicentre study, the renewal of the radiologic system was associated with a highly significant 40%-50% reduction in radiation dose, irrespective of the manufacturer. A close interaction between manufacturers and operators is needed to optimise the use of new equipment and the effectiveness of radiation reduction tools and techniques.

Patient doses in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE:

Hybrid surgical methods such as remote endarterectomy and endovascular revascularization are fluoroscopy-guided procedures successfully replacing conventional open surgery for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to: (1) evaluate the dose parameters describing exposure of patients undergoing endovascular or hybrid revascularization of the lower limb (below the inguinal ligament); (2) compare the data available in the literature with the evaluations of patients' dose values and related factors for patients undergoing such procedures; (3) examine the correlation of doses with certain parameters; (4) estimate the peak skin dose and assess the potential for radiation-induced skin injuries during the procedures.

METHODS:

Data for 259 patients were extracted retrospectively and analyzed. The procedures were grouped by type of intervention, vascular approach, and level of complexity. The analyses included the correlation of dose values with the operating team.

RESULTS:

The air kerma-area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) values greatly varied depending on the procedure type but also among patients undergoing the same procedure. The type of vascular access has the largest impact on patients' doses. The KAP and FT values for brachial artery were: 347 Gy.cm² and FT: NA; for contralateral common femoral artery (CFA) approach: 207 Gy.cm² and 153 s; e.g. significantly higher than for ipsilateral CFA: 96 Gy.cm² and 78 s; for hybrid surgery: 77 Gy.cm² and 41 s; and for ipsilateral retrograde popliteal approach: 61 Gy.cm² and 53 s. The same tendency is observed for the peak skin dose (PSD) values: the highest are for brachial artery (2053 mGy) and contralateral CFA (1325 mGy) approach, followed by the ipsilateral CFA (748 mGy), hybrid surgery (649 mGy), and ipsilateral retrograde popliteal approach (566 mGy).

CONCLUSION:

Registered dose values and FT for the different procedures do not exceed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) proposed trigger values for patients' follow-up for radiation-induced skin injuries. The type of vascular access has the highest negative impact on radiation dose levels and resultant KAP, PSD, and FT values. There is a significant increase of the dose values with increase of the number of inserted stents and the level of complexity. This should be considered in planning, especially for patients who undergo multiple diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

This study gives a systematic understanding for patient radiation exposure in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of the lower extremities, thus far absent in the literature.

Estimating Fluoroscopic Peak Skin Dose Using Manual Calculations

Not all healthcare providers can afford to purchase commercially available programs that can quickly and easily provide peak skin dose estimations for patients undergoing diagnostic and international fluoroscopic procedures. The air kerma reference point exposure, Ka,r, available on all equipment manufactured after 2006, may over or under estimate the patient's peak skin dose. The total air kerma reference point exposure provided at the end of a case might be on the order of 20 Gy for a patient, indicating that a Joint Commission 'sentinel event' may have occurred. An investigation to determine whether a sentinel event has occurred becomes necessary. This article will introduce information available to the investigating health physicist for data mining, how to process that information, and then how best to interpret the results. I have used this system of data mining and analysis to effectively influence how physicians performing diagnostic and interventional fluoroscopic procedures use fluoroscopic equipment. Arriving at an answer is not simple; it is time consuming, and the methodologies are imperfect. Your effort can result in improved utilization of fluoroscopic equipment at your institution which in turn will lower patient and staff doses.

Trends in Patient Exposure to Radiation in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Over a 10-Year Period

Technological progress has made it possible to reduce the dose of radiation delivered by medical x-ray systems. In parallel, interventional coronary procedures have become increasingly complex and consequently, last longer. This study aimed to compare the estimated dose of radiation received by patients in interventional cardiology at 10 years interval (2006 vs 2016). The study population included all patients who underwent interventional coronary procedures in one of the catheterization laboratories of our institution during 2 periods, namely, period 1 from October 2005 to March 2006, and period 2 from November 2015 to October 2016. The primary end point was the estimated dose of radiation received by the patient as assessed by dose area product. In 2016, the estimated dose of radiation received by patients who underwent interventional coronary procedures was on average 78% lower than that received in 2006 (p <0.0001), whereas the fluoroscopy time increased by 54% on average over the same period (p <0.0001). By multivariate analysis, including age, approach, body mass index, fluoroscopy time, and performance of angioplasty, the reduction in radiation remained significant. The radial approach was significantly associated with an increased estimated dose of radiation received (p <0.0001). In conclusion, the estimated dose of radiation received by patients who underwent interventional cardiology procedures has been reduced by 78% over the last decade.

Time-Course Reduction in Patient Exposure to Radiation From Coronary Interventional Procedures

Background—

The frequency of complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) has increased in the last few years, with a growing concern on the radiation dose received by the patients. Multicenter data from large unselected populations on patients’ radiation doses during coronary angiography (CA) and PCI and temporal trends are lacking. This study sought to evaluate the temporal trends in patients’ exposure to radiation from CA and PCI.

Methods and Results—

Data were taken from the CARDIO-ARSIF registry that prospectively collects data on all CAs and PCIs performed in the 36 catheterization laboratories in the Greater Paris Area, the most populated regions in France with about 12 million inhabitants. Kerma area product and Fluoroscopy time from 152 684 consecutive CAs and 103 177 PCIs performed between 2009 and 2013 were analyzed. A continuous trend for a decrease in median [interquartile range] Kerma area product was observed, from 33 [19–55] Gy cm 2 in 2009 to 27 [16–44] Gy cm 2 in 2013 for CA ( P <0.0001), and from 73 [41–125] to 55 [31–91] Gy cm 2 for PCI ( P <0.0001). Time-course differences in Kerma area product remained highly significant after adjustment on Fluoroscopy time, PCI procedure complexity, change of x-ray equipment, and other patient- and procedure-related covariates.

Conclusions—

In a large patient population, a steady temporal decrease in patient radiation exposure during CA and PCI was noted between 2009 and 2013. Kerma area product reduction was consistent in all types of procedure and was independent of patient-related factors and PCI procedure complexity.