Electrophysiological effects of dronedarone (SR33589), a noniodinated benzofuran derivative, in the rabbit heart : comparison with amiodarone

Exploring the interplay between extracellular pH and Dronedarone's pharmacological effects on cardiac function

Dronedarone (DRN) is a clinically used drug to mitigate arrhythmias with multichannel block properties, including the sodium channel Nav1.5. Extracellular acidification is known to change the pharmacological properties of several antiarrhythmic drugs. Here, we explore how modification in extracellular pH (pHe) shapes the pharmacological profile of DRN upon Nav1.5 sodium current (INa) and in the ex vivo heart preparation. Embryonic human kidney cells (HEK293T/17) were used to transiently express the human isoform of Nav1.5 α-subunit. Patch-Clamp technique was employed to study INa. Neurotoxin-II (ATX-II) was used to induce the late sodium current (INaLate). Additionally, ex vivo Wistar male rat preparations in the Langendorff system were utilized to study electrocardiogram (ECG) waves. DRN preferentially binds to the closed state inactivation mode of Nav1.5 at pHe 7.0. The recovery from INa inactivation was delayed in the presence of DRN in both pHe 7.0 and 7.4, and the use-dependent properties were distinct at pHe 7.0 and 7.4. However, the potency of DRN upon the peak INa, the voltage dependence for activation, and the steady-state inactivation curves were not altered in both pHe tested. Also, the pHe did not change the ability of DRN to block INaLate. Lastly, DRN in a concentration and pH dependent manner modulated the QRS complex, QT and RR interval in clinically relevant concentration. Thus, the pharmacological properties of DRN upon Nav1.5 and ex vivo heart preparation partially depend on the pHe. The pHe changed the biological effect of DRN in the heart electrical function in relevant clinical concentration.

Indane-1,3-Dione: From Synthetic Strategies to Applications

Indane-1,3-dione is a versatile building block used in numerous applications ranging from biosensing, bioactivity, bioimaging to electronics or photopolymerization. In this review, an overview of the different chemical reactions enabling access to this scaffold but also to the most common derivatives of indane-1,3-dione are presented. Parallel to this, the different applications in which indane-1,3-dione-based structures have been used are also presented, evidencing the versatility of this structure.

In vivo and cellular antiarrhythmic and cardiac electrophysiological effects of desethylamiodarone in dog cardiac preparations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to study the antiarrhythmic effects and cellular mechanisms of desethylamiodarone (DEA), the main metabolite of amiodarone (AMIO), following acute and chronic 4-week oral treatments (25-50 mg·kg^-1 ·day^-1 ).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The antiarrhythmic effects of acute iv. (10 mg·kg^-1 ) and chronic oral (4 weeks, 25 mg·kg^-1 ·day^-1 ) administration of DEA were assessed in carbachol and tachypacing-induced dog atrial fibrillation models. Action potentials were recorded from atrial and right ventricular tissue following acute (10 μM) and chronic (p.o. 4 weeks, 50 mg·kg^-1 ·day^-1 ) DEA application using the conventional microelectrode technique. Ionic currents were measured by the whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique in isolated left ventricular myocytes. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed following a single intravenous dose (25 mg·kg^-1 ) of AMIO and DEA intravenously and orally. In chronic (91-day) toxicological investigations, DEA and AMIO were administered in the oral dose of 25 mg·kg^-1 ·day^-1 ).

KEY RESULTS

DEA exerted marked antiarrhythmic effects in both canine atrial fibrillation models. Both acute and chronic DEA administration prolonged action potential duration in atrial and ventricular muscle without any changes detected in Purkinje fibres. DEA decreased the amplitude of several outward potassium currents such as I_Kr , I_Ks , I_K1 , I_to , and I_KACh , while the I_CaL and late I_Na inward currents were also significantly depressed. Better drug bioavailability and higher volume of distribution for DEA were observed compared to AMIO. No neutropenia and less severe pulmonary fibrosis was found following DEA compared to that of AMIO administration.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Chronic DEA treatment in animal experiments has marked antiarrhythmic and electrophysiological effects with better pharmacokinetics and lower toxicity than its parent compound. These results suggest that the active metabolite, DEA, should be considered for clinical trials as a possible new, more favourable option for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation.

Predictors of dronedarone plasma drug concentrations and effect on atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter recurrence: Analyses from the EURIDIS and ADONIS studies

BACKGROUND

In this post hoc analysis, we assessed patient characteristics as predictors of dronedarone trough concentrations and characterized the relationship of trough concentrations of dronedarone with its efficacy and safety.

HYPOTHESIS

Dronedarone is recommended as a 400 mg twice daily dose taken orally with meals. We hypothesize that drug concentration/bioavailability of dronedarone, measured as above- and below-median trough concentrations, does not impact the efficacy outcomes.

METHODS

Average trough concentrations (Ctrough_avg ) across multiple timepoints were calculated for each patient, and patient Ctrough_avg values were categorized as below-median or above-median concentrations. The effect of patient baseline characteristics on dronedarone Ctrough_avg was assessed in the below-median versus above-median groups. The effect of dronedarone in each Ctrough_avg group versus placebo on risk of first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) recurrence and safety was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 1795 plasma samples were available from 507 dronedarone-treated patients. An above-median Ctrough_avg was associated with age ≥75 years, female sex, lower weight, higher pacemaker use, and higher oral anticoagulant use. The risk of adjudicated first AF/AFL recurrence was significantly lower with dronedarone versus placebo in the below-median (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.91; p = .0054) and above-median groups (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50-0.81; p = .0002). No difference in risk of AF/AFL recurrence was observed between the above- and below-median groups. Safety and tolerability of dronedarone were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Significant reduction in AF/AFL recurrence was observed in patients treated with dronedarone versus placebo, regardless of dronedarone concentrations above or below the median value.

Dronedarone hydrochloride enhances the bioactivity of endothelial progenitor cells via regulation of the AKT signaling pathway

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Because of the side effects and incomplete recovery from current therapy, stem cell therapy emerges as a potential therapy for CVD treatment, and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) is one of the key stem cells used for therapeutic applications. The effect of this therapy required the expansion of EPC function. To enhance the EPC activation, proliferation, and angiogenesis using dronedarone hydrochloride (DH) is the purpose of this study. DH received approval for atrial fibrillation treatment and its cardiovascular protective effects were already reported. In this study, DH significantly increased EPC proliferation, tube formation, migration, and maintained EPCs surface marker expression. In addition, DH treatment up-regulated the phosphorylation of AKT and reduced the reactive oxygen species production. In summary, the cell priming by DH considerably improved the functional activity of EPCs, and the use of which might be a novel strategy for CVD treatment.

Current Drug Treatment Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation and TASK-1 Inhibition as an Emerging Novel Therapy Option

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with a prevalence of up to 4% and an upwards trend due to demographic changes. It is associated with an increase in mortality and stroke incidences. While stroke risk can be significantly reduced through anticoagulant therapy, adequate treatment of other AF related symptoms remains an unmet medical need in many cases. Two main treatment strategies are available: rate control that modulates ventricular heart rate and prevents tachymyopathy as well as rhythm control that aims to restore and sustain sinus rhythm. Rate control can be achieved through drugs or ablation of the atrioventricular node, rendering the patient pacemaker-dependent. For rhythm control electrical cardioversion and pharmacological cardioversion can be used. While electrical cardioversion requires fasting and sedation of the patient, antiarrhythmic drugs have other limitations. Most antiarrhythmic drugs carry a risk for pro-arrhythmic effects and are contraindicated in patients with structural heart diseases. Furthermore, catheter ablation of pulmonary veins can be performed with its risk of intraprocedural complications and varying success. In recent years TASK-1 has been introduced as a new target for AF therapy. Upregulation of TASK-1 in AF patients contributes to prolongation of the action potential duration. In a porcine model of AF, TASK-1 inhibition by gene therapy or pharmacological compounds induced cardioversion to sinus rhythm. The DOxapram Conversion TO Sinus rhythm (DOCTOS)-Trial will reveal whether doxapram, a potent TASK-1 inhibitor, can be used for acute cardioversion of persistent and paroxysmal AF in patients, potentially leading to a new treatment option for AF.

Cardioprotective Effects of Dronedarone Mediated by the Influence on the Expression of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor

PURPOSE

Dronedarone is a multichannel-blocking antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Observational data hypothesized a cardioprotective effect. In an in vitro endothelial cell-platelet model, we evaluated the molecular atheroprotective effects of dronedarone.

METHODS

Following a 24-h incubation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with dronedarone (concentration 50, 100, and 150 ng/mL), they were then stimulated for 1 h with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and were subsequently incubated in direct contact with thrombin-activated platelets. After incubation, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets, and the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) on endothelial cells were measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Preincubation with 150 ng/mL of dronedarone reduced the expression of uPAR on endothelial cells after proinflammatory stimulation with LPS and also by direct endothelial contact with activated platelets (p = 0.0038). In contrast, the expression of CD40L and CD62P on platelets after proinflammatory stimulation with thrombin was significantly increased through direct preincubation with 50/100/150 ng/mL of dronedarone. However, dronedarone had no effects on the expression of MT1-MMP and ICAM-1 in HUVECs.

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro analysis, dronedarone directly increased platelet activation but showed significant direct effects on endothelial cells and indirect effects on platelets on selected markers of atherosclerosis.

Atria-selective antiarrhythmic drugs in need of alliance partners

Atria-selective antiarrhythmic drugs in need of alliance partners. Guideline-based treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) comprises prevention of thromboembolism and stroke, as well as antiarrhythmic therapy by drugs, electrical rhythm conversion, ablation and surgical procedures. Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs are burdened with unwanted side effects including a propensity of triggering life-threatening ventricular fibrillation. In order to solve this therapeutic dilemma, 'atria-selective' antiarrhythmic drugs have been developed for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. These drugs are designed to aim at atrial targets, taking advantage of differences in atrial and ventricular ion channel expression and function. However it is not clear, whether such drugs are sufficiently antiarrhythmic or whether they are in need of an alliance partner for clinical efficacy. Atria-selective Na⁺ channel blockers display fast dissociation kinetics and high binding affinity to inactivated channels. Compounds targeting atria-selective K⁺ channels include blockers of ultra rapid delayed rectifier (Kv1.5) or acetylcholine-activated inward rectifier K⁺ channels (Kir3.x), inward rectifying K⁺ channels (Kir2.x), Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels of small conductance (SK), weakly rectifying two-pore domain K⁺ channels (K_2P), and transient receptor potential channels (TRP). Despite good antiarrhythmic data from in-vitro and animal model experiments, clinical efficacy of atria-selective antiarrhythmic drugs remains to be demonstrated. In the present review we will briefly summarize the novel compounds and their proposed antiarrhythmic action. In addition, we will discuss the evidence for putative improvement of antiarrhythmic efficacy and potency by addressing multiple pathophysiologically relevant targets as possible alliance partners.

Influence of Amiodarone and Dronedarone on the Force-Interval Dependence of Rat Myocardium

The antiarrhythmic effect of amiodarone and its analogue dronedarone is caused by their direct actions on several cardiomyocyte sarcolemmal ion currents. However, whether their effects are related to intracellular calcium levels is not exactly known. Ca²⁺ cycling refers to the release and reuptake of intracellular Ca²⁺, which induces muscle contraction and relaxation and determines the force-interval dependence. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of amiodarone and dronedarone on the force-interval relationship. Materials and Results. The work was performed on the papillary muscles of the left ventricle of male Wistar rats. Muscle perfusion was performed at 36.5°C with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit solution with baseline stimulation 0.5 Hz. The postrest test (4-60 s) and the extrasystolic exposure (0.2-1.5 s) were evaluated. Inotropic reaction to the test exposure was evaluated before and after muscle perfusion with solution containing amiodarone (10⁻⁶ M) or dronedarone (10⁻⁶ M) during 10 min. Amiodarone or dronedarone led to decrease of the amplitude of extrasystolic contractions of the papillary muscles. The amplitude of postextrasystolic contractions after short extrasystolic intervals on the background of the drugs was increased. Amiodarone and dronedarone led to increase of the amplitude of postrest contractions. Conclusions. Dronedarone reduces the excitability of cardiomyocyte sarcolemma to a greater extent than amiodarone. Amiodarone and dronedarone are able to increase postextrasystolic and postrest potentiation. The effect of amiodarone on postextrasystolic and postrest potentiation is more pronounced in comparison with dronedarone.

Emerging pharmacotherapies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The main aim of current research on the field of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment is to find new antiarrhythmic drugs with less side effects. Areas covered: Dronedarone and vernakalant showed promising result in term of efficacy and safety in selected patients. Ranolazine and colchicine are obtaining a role as a potential antiarrhythmic drug. Ivabradine is used in experimental studies for the rate control of AF. Moreover, new compounds (vanoxerine, moxonidine, budiodarone) are still under investigation. Monoclonal antibodies or selective antagonist of potassium channel are under investigation for long term maintenance of sinus rhythm. Clinical evidence and new pharmacological investigation on new drugs will be accurately reviewed in this article. Expert opinion: Dronedarone use is not recommended in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), NYHA class III-IV, depressed ventricular function and permanent AF, especially in patients assuming a concomitant therapy with digoxin. Vernakalant had superior efficacy than amiodarone, flecainide and propafenone in single studies and similar efficacy to direct current cardioversion. Several of the developing drugs examined in this paper show an interesting potential, in particular the research on selective ionic channel inhibition and on compounds which reduce the inflammation state, especially after ablation or surgery.

Effect of dronedarone on the pharmacokinetics of carvedilol following oral administration to rats

Dronedarone is a CYP2D6 inhibitor; therefore, it is prudent to exercise caution when concurrently administering CYP2D6-metabolized β-blockers because of a lack of published data on potential drug interactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dronedarone on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered carvedilol in rats. Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups and 10mg/kg carvedilol was administered to the rat with or without dronedarone pretreatment in a parallel design. Blood samples were collected before and after 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h of drug administration. The plasma concentration of carvedilol was determined using LC-MS/MS. The systemic exposure to carvedilol was significantly increased and elimination of carvedilol was significantly decreased in the dronedarone-pretreated rats than in the vehicle-pretreated rats. The one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was sufficient to explain the pharmacokinetic characters after single oral administration of carvedilol to both vehicle-pretreated and dronedarone-pretreated rats. This study suggests that dronedarone inhibits CYP2D6-mediated carvedilol metabolism, and dose adjustment is needed in carvedilol and dronedarone combination therapy. Further studies are needed to clarify the effect of dronedarone on carvedilol and CYP2D6 substrates in clinical use.

Dronedarone: An Amiodarone Analog for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

Objective:

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Data Sources:

A literature search was conducted using the search terms dronedarone, SR 33589, atrial fibrillation, and antiarrhythmic medication in MEDLINE (1966–February 2007), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–February 2007), and EMBASE (1990–February 2007). References from the identified trials and selected review articles were evaluated. Additional information, including abstracts and posters, was obtained from Sanofi-Aventis.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Published studies and meeting abstracts evaluating the effects of dronedarone in humans and animals were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Dronedarone is a novel antiarrhythmic medication to treat atrial fibrillation. Dronedarone has a multifaceted mechanism of action similar to that of amiodarone. Dronedarone works by blocking potassium, sodium, and calcium channels and exhibits antiadrenergic properties. The drug has been evaluated at doses of 400, 600, and 800 mg twice daily. It prolonged the time to atrial fibrillation recurrence to 60–158 days compared with 5–59 days with placebo and decreased heart rate during atrial fibrillation by 12–25 beats/min in clinical trials. Major adverse events include gastrointestinal side effects and risk of proarrhythmia. Dronedarone may increase the risk of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

Conclusions:

Dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to better define dronedarone's safety profile and place in therapy.

Antiarrhythmic and Proarrhythmic Properties of QT-Prolonging Antianginal Drugs

In recent years there has been a major reorientation of drug therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, its changing role, and above all, a radical change in the class of arrhythmia drugs because of their impact on mortality. The decline in the use of sodium-channel blockers has led to an expanding use of β-blockers and simple or complex class III agents for controlling cardiac arrhythmias. Success with these agents in the context of their side effects has spurred the development of compounds with simpler ion-channel blocking properties that have less complex adverse reactions. The resulting so-called pure class III agents, such as dofetilide or ibutilide, were found to have antifibrillatory effects in atrial fibrillation and flutter and in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Such agents are effective and have diversity, but they have come into therapeutics with a price: the sometimes-fatal torsades de pointes. The drug amiodarone, a complex compound that was synthesized as an antianginal agent, has been an exception in this regard. Its therapeutic use is associated with a negligibly low incidence of torsades de pointes, even though the drug produces significant bradycardia and QT lengthening to 500 to 700 msec. Recent electrophysiologic studies suggest that this paradox is likely due to the differential block of ion channels in endocardium, epicardium, midmyocardial (M) cells, and Purkinje fibers in the ventricular myocardium. There is also clinical evidence suggesting that amiodarone reduces the “torsadogenic” effects of pure class III agents. Ranolazine was also synthesized for the development of antianginal properties that stem from a partial inhibition of fatty acid oxidation; it too has been found to have electrophysioloigic properties. These are somewhat similar to those of amiodarone on ion channels in endocardium, epicardium, M cells, and Purkinje fibers in the ventricular myocardium, but the drug does not prolong the QT interval to the same extent as amiodarone does. Thus, the drug produces modest increases in repolarization as judged by its effects on the action potential duration (APD) without the potential for the development of torsades de pointes. By virtue of its suppressant action on early afterdepolarizations and triggered activity in Purkinje fibers and M cells, the drug appears to have a powerful potential for reducing the torsadogenic proclivity of conventional class III antiarrhythmic compounds. The rationale for the therapeutic niche for amiodarone, and especially in the case of ranolazine, in the prevention of drug-induced torsades de pointes is discussed.

Discovery of 5-Phenyl-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-2-(pyrimidin-5-yl)quinazolin-4-amine as a Potent I Kur Inhibitor

A new series of phenylquinazoline inhibitors of Kv 1.5 is disclosed. The series was optimized for Kv 1.5 potency, selectivity versus hERG, pharmacokinetic exposure, and pharmacodynamic potency. 5-Phenyl-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)-2-(pyrimidin-5-yl)quinazolin-4-amine (13k) was identified as a potent and ion channel selective inhibitor with robust efficacy in the preclinical rat ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) model and the rabbit atrial effective refractory period (AERP) model.

Dronedarone: Basic Pharmacology and Clinical Use

Dronedarone is the newest antiarrhythmic drug approved for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is a multi-channel blocker with diverse electrophysiologic properties. Dronedarone decreases the incidence of AF recurrence and the ventricular rate during recurrence. Dronedarone decreases rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Dronedarone increases mortality in patients with permanent AF and those with moderate-severe heart failure, and should thus be avoided in these populations. Dronedarone is less effective than amiodarone but also has less toxicity. Direct comparison with other antiarrhythmic drugs is not available.

Molecular motions that shape the cardiac action potential: Insights from voltage clamp fluorometry

Very recently, voltage-clamp fluorometry (VCF) protocols have been developed to observe the membrane proteins responsible for carrying the ventricular ionic currents that form the action potential (AP), including those carried by the cardiac Na(+) channel, NaV1.5, the L-type Ca(2+) channel, CaV1.2, the Na(+)/K(+) ATPase, and the rapid and slow components of the delayed rectifier, KV11.1 and KV7.1. This development is significant, because VCF enables simultaneous observation of ionic current kinetics with conformational changes occurring within specific channel domains. The ability gained from VCF, to connect nanoscale molecular movement to ion channel function has revealed how the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) control ion flux through channel pores, mechanisms of post-translational regulation and the molecular pathology of inherited mutations. In the future, we expect that this data will be of great use for the creation of multi-scale computational AP models that explicitly represent ion channel conformations, connecting molecular, cell and tissue electrophysiology. Here, we review the VCF protocol, recent results, and discuss potential future developments, including potential use of these experimental findings to create novel computational models.

New anthyarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Different studies have shown no significant difference between rhythm and rate control strategies in terms of mortality. Moreover, the use of antiarrhythmic drugs is afflicted by cardiac and extracardiac toxicity and related costs of hospitalization. Nevertheless, some patients require a rhythm-control strategy and new anti-AF agents are being sought. Only few novel agents showed promising results in term of efficacy and safety. Dronedarone and vernakalant are two of these compounds, respectively introduced for the chronic and acute rhythm control of AF. This article will review pharmacology and clinical evidence on the use of dronedarone and vernakalant and will mention currently investigated new antiarrhythmic drugs.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study to assess the effects of dronedarone 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks on atrial fibrillation burden in subjects with permanent pacemakers

Purpose

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative with a pharmacological profile similar to amiodarone but has a more rapid onset of action and a much shorter half-life (13–19 h). Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of dronedarone in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients using dual-chamber pacemakers capable of quantifying atrial fibrillation burden.

Methods

Pacemakers were adjusted to optimize AF detection. Patients with AF burden >1 % were randomized to dronedarone 400 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. Pacemakers were interrogated after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in AF burden from baseline over the 12-week treatment period. Patients with permanent AF, severe/recently decompensated heart failure, and current use of antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded. AF burden was assessed by a core laboratory blinded to treatment assignment.

Results

From 285 patients screened, 112 were randomized (mean age 76 years, 60 % male, 84 % hypertensive, 65 % with sick sinus syndrome, 26 % with diabetes mellitus type II, 15 % with heart failure). Baseline mean (SEM) AF burden was 8.77 % (0.16) for placebo and 10.14 % (0.17) for dronedarone. Over the 12-week study period, AF burden compared to baseline decreased by 54.4 % (0.22) (P = 0.0009) with dronedarone and trended higher by 12.8 % (0.16) (P = 0.450) with placebo. The absolute change in burden was decreased by 5.5 % in the dronedarone group and increased by 1.1 % in the placebo group. Heart rate during AF was reduced to approximately 4 beats/min with dronedarone (P = 0.285). Adverse events were higher with dronedarone compared to placebo (65 vs 56 %).

Conclusions

Dronedarone reduced pacemaker-assessed the relative AF burden compared to baseline and placebo by over 50 % during the 12-week observation period.

Evaluation of dronedarone as a therapeutic option for patients with atrial fibrillation

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the predominant dysrhythmia affecting approximately 2·4 million people in the United States and over 6 million Europeans. Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative of amiodarone newly approved in 2009 for the treatment of AF. Here, we comment on the efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with AF.

COMMENT

Eight randomized controlled trials were analysed in this article. Several trials showed that dronedarone therapy delayed AF recurrence, controlled ventricular rate and reduced incidences of hospitalization or death. However, some of the studies were terminated early due to an excess mortality rate. Further studies on long-term safety and trials on direct comparison to rate controlling medications are suggested to obtain additional insight of dronedarone.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Dronedarone reduces the incidence of AF recurrences, hospitalization and death in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. However, dronedarone should not be used in high-risk patients with permanent AF or patients with unstable chronic heart failure (HF) due to safety concerns.

Efficacy of dronedarone versus propafenone in the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

PURPOSE

Our objective was to compare the efficacy of dronedarone and propafenone in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after electrical cardioversion.

METHODS

In this single-center, open-label, randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients with AF after electrical cardioversion to receive dronedarone 400 mg BID or propafenone 150 mg TID. Follow-up clinical evaluations were conducted at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months of treatment. The primary end point was the time to the first recurrence of AF.

FINDINGS

A total of 98 patients were enrolled (79 men; mean age, 59.2 years; n = 49 per group). The median times to first recurrence of AF were 31 days in the dronedarone group and 32 days in the propafenone group (P = 0.715). The median (interquartile range) ventricular rates at first recurrence of AF were 76.5 (67.3-86.5) beats/min in the dronedarone group and 83.0 (71.0-96.0) beats/min in the propafenone group (P = 0.059).

IMPLICATIONS

Dronedarone and propafenone had similar efficacies in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF after electrical cardioversion. The ventricular rate at the first recurrence of AF was numerically but not statistically significantly lower in the dronedarone group than in the propafenone group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01991119.

Testosterone replacement increases aged pulmonary vein and left atrium arrhythmogenesis with enhanced adrenergic activity

BACKGROUND

Aging and testosterone deficiency contribute to the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). We determine the effects of testosterone replacement on the electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis of pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA) in aged rabbits.

METHODS

Electrocardiography, heart rate variability, echocardiography, Western blot and conventional microelectrodes were used in aged rabbits (age, >2 years) with and without (control) testosterone treatment (10mg/kg, 12 weeks).

RESULTS

Testosterone-treated aged rabbits had longer corrected QT interval, higher low frequency/high frequency, greater left ventricle (LV) mass but lower LA total emptying fraction and LV ejection fraction than control rabbits. In tissue preparations, the spontaneous rate was faster for testosterone-treated PVs than for control PVs. Angiotensin II concentration-dependently increased the amplitude of delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) in testosterone-treated PVs but only did so at the highest angiotensin II concentration (100 nM) in control PVs. Isoproterenol increased the incidence of early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and DADs in testosterone-treated PVs but not in control PVs. Testosterone-treated PVs had more H2O2-induced burst firing and EADs than control PVs. Testosterone-treated LAs had more isoproterenol-induced DADs and spontaneous activity than did control LAs. However, acetylcholine infusion and rapid atrial pacing (10-20 Hz) induced AF in control LAs but not in testosterone-treated LAs. In addition, as compared with control LAs, testosterone-treated LAs expressed more androgen receptor, β1-adrenergic receptor, and Cav 1.2 and less G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 and Kv 4.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone replacement increased arrhythmogenesis in PV and LA by enhancing adrenergic activity in aged rabbits.

Effect of dronedarone on clinical end points in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease: insights from the ATHENA trial

AIMS

This study aimed to assess safety and cardiovascular outcomes of dronedarone in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with coronary heart disease (CHD). Coronary heart disease is prevalent among AF patients and limits antiarrhythmic drug use because of their potentially life-threatening ventricular proarrhythmic effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This post hoc analysis evaluated 1405 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and CHD from the ATHENA trial. Follow-up lasted 2.5 years, during which patients received either dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) or a double-blind matching placebo. Primary outcome was time to first cardiovascular hospitalization or death due to any cause. Secondary end points included first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. The primary outcome occurred in 350 of 737 (47%) placebo patients vs. 252 of 668 (38%) dronedarone patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.86; P = 0.0002] without a significant increase in number of adverse events. In addition, 42 of 668 patients receiving dronedarone suffered from a first acute coronary syndrome compared with 67 of 737 patients from the placebo group (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46-0.99; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis, dronedarone on top of standard care in AF patients with CHD reduced cardiovascular hospitalization or death similar to that in the overall ATHENA population, and reduced a first acute coronary syndrome. Importantly, the safety profile in this subpopulation was also similar to that of the overall ATHENA population, with no excess in proarrhythmias. The mechanism of the cardiovascular protective effects is unclear and warrants further investigation.

Benefit-risk assessment of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be achieved using pharmacological therapy. Amiodarone is the most efficacious anti-arrhythmic agent; however, its use is limited due to an unfavourable safety profile, including pro-arrhythmia, thyroid, liver, skin and pulmonary complications. Dronedarone, which is structurally similar to amiodarone, was developed to try and achieve a favourable balance of efficacy and risk. Dronedarone has been evaluated in several large clinical trials, which have shown reduced mortality and hospitalization rates in patients with non-permanent AF. In patients with permanent AF and/or heart failure, dronedarone has been shown to cause increased mortality and morbidity and should not be used in these groups. Compared with amiodarone, dronedarone has fewer toxic effects (thyroid, skin, pulmonary) and, although less efficacious, may be used as first-line therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with non-permanent AF. Clinicians must be vigilant in monitoring their patients to ensure they do not develop permanent AF or heart failure.

Cardiac ion channels and mechanisms for protection against atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognised as the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. Ongoing drug development is aiming at obtaining atrial specific effects in order to prevent pro-arrhythmic, devastating ventricular effects. In principle, this is possible due to a different ion channel composition in the atria and ventricles. The present text will review the aetiology of arrhythmias with focus on AF and include a description of cardiac ion channels. Channels that constitute potentially atria-selective targets will be described in details. Specific focus is addressed to the recent discovery that Ca(2+)-activated small conductance K(+) channels (SK channels) are important for the repolarisation of atrial action potentials. Finally, an overview of current pharmacological treatment of AF is included.

Effects of dronedarone started rapidly after amiodarone discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have shown that amiodarone is effective in treating atrial fibrillation (AF), but is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects; however, due to amiodarone's long elimination half-life (20-100 days), physicians may hesitate to start other drugs until it has fully cleared.

HYPOTHESIS

A rapid switch from amiodarone to dronedarone is feasible.

METHODS

EURIDIS and ADONIS were double-blind, multinational, parallel-group trials comparing the efficacy and safety of dronedarone with placebo over 12 months. This retrospective subanalysis of EURIDIS/ADONIS compared the effects of dronedarone in patients discontinuing amiodarone within 2 days before randomization ("rapid switch") with results in patients who had received no amiodarone during the 2 months preceding randomization.

RESULTS

In total, 1237 patients were enrolled ("rapid switch", n = 154; "no amiodarone", n = 1014). In both the "rapid switch" and the "no amiodarone" groups, dronedarone users had significantly lower AF recurrence than patients receiving placebo (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.44-0.95; P = 0.0224 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.67-0.92; P = 0.0027, respectively). Dronedarone users had a higher incidence of bradyarrhythmic events than placebo-treated patients. A "rapid switch" from amiodarone to dronedarone was associated with a higher incidence of serious heart failure events and heart failure hospitalizations versus all other groups. Overall event rates were low and there was no significant difference in total adverse event rates or deaths between groups.

CONCLUSION

In this patient population, a switch from amiodarone to dronedarone within a 2-day time frame might be feasible in certain patient categories, but further investigation is warranted.

Chronic oral amiodarone but not dronedarone therapy increases ventricular defibrillation threshold during acute myocardial ischemia in a closed-chest animal model

Dronedarone, a recently approved antiarrhythmic drug, has been shown to have fewer side effects than amiodarone, particularly with regard to thyroid and neurologic events. Since the effects of either drug on ventricular defibrillation threshold during ischemia are unknown, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of dronedarone and amiodarone on defibrillation efficacy during ischemia in a closed-chest animal model. Dronedarone (30 mg·kg·d) and amiodarone (20 mg·kg·d) were administered orally for 3 weeks to 19 and 21 pigs, respectively. A control group (no treatment) comprised 19 pigs. A 2-lead endovascular defibrillation system was used. Each biphasic shock was delivered after 8 seconds of ventricular fibrillation. A step-up/step-down protocol was used to calculate mean defibrillation threshold before and 10 minutes after coronary artery occlusion using an angioplasty balloon in the left descending artery. At basal state, defibrillation threshold did not differ between the control (20.8 ± 4.8 J), amiodarone (21.2 ± 2 J), and dronedarone (19.5 ± 3 J) groups. After ischemia, the amiodarone group had a significantly higher defibrillation threshold than the control group (29.6 ± 3 J vs. 21.8 ± 5 J, respectively; P = 0.015), but the dronedarone (22.8 ± 4 J) and control groups had similar defibrillation threshold values. These data indicate that oral dronedarone treatment, unlike oral amiodarone, does not affect defibrillation threshold during ischemia in pigs.

Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes with dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation or heart failure

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration to decrease the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated cardiovascular risk factors who are in sinus rhythm or will undergo cardioversion. There has been recent evidence to suggest that dronedarone may not have a favorable safety profile. We decided to evaluate all available evidence on the cardiovascular safety of this drug. A systematic search was made of the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1966 through 2011 comparing dronedarone to comparators in AF/heart failure. Intervention was dronedarone for AF for some studies and heart failure for others. Comparators included standard medical therapy and/or placebo and amiodarone for 1 study. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, embolic events, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure exacerbations, and hospitalization rates in the intervention versus comparator group at the end of ≥ 3 months of follow up with abstraction of data by 1 author. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. Dronedarone use was associated with a trend toward worse all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations. It also showed numerically higher event rates for all other outcome events except acute coronary syndrome. Our pooled analysis showed increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations with use of dronedarone across a wide spectrum of populations. In conclusion, we recommend exercising caution using dronedarone, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Dronedarone: an overview

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Until recently, a rhythm control strategy for AF has been limited by drug toxicity and side-effects, and landmark AF trials have shown that such a strategy is not superior to a rate control one. New antiarrhythmic drugs, free of undesired effects, would enhance the rhythm control strategy, with the possibility of sinus rhythm restoration and maintenance. One of the promising drugs recently approved for clinical use is dronedarone. This drug has amiodarone-like antiarrhythmic and electrophysiological properties, despite it having a modified structure and lacking an iodine moiety. Thus, dronedarone lacks amiodarone's organ toxicity (including adverse thyroid and pulmonary effects). The efficacy of dronedarone has been investigated in several clinical trials, proving its effect in the prevention of AF recurrence, rate control in paroxysmal/persistent and permanent AF, reduction of cardiovascular hospitalization or death from any cause, and others. Indirect comparisons with amiodarone, as well as one head-to-head study of the two drugs, indicate that the relative safety of dronedarone may be at a cost of its lower antiarrhythmic efficacy compared with amiodarone.

Safety and efficacy of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter

Dronedarone is an amiodarone analog but differs structurally from amiodarone in that the iodine moiety was removed and a methane-sulfonyl group was added. These modifications reduced thyroid and other end-organ adverse effects and makes dronedarone less lipophilic, shortening its half-life. Dronedarone has been shown to prevent atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFl) recurrences in several multi-center trials. In addition to its rhythm control properties, dronedarone has rate control properties and slows the ventricular response during AF. Dronedarone is approved in Europe for rhythm and rate control indications. In patients with decompensated heart failure, dronedarone treatment increased mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. However, when dronedarone was used in elderly high risk AF/AFl patients excluding such high risk heart failure, cardiovascular hospitalizations were significantly reduced and the drug was approved in the USA for this indication in 2009 by the Food and Drug Administration. Updated guidelines suggest dronedarone as a front-line antiarrhythmic in many patients with AF/Fl but caution that the drug should not be used in patients with advanced heart failure. In addition, the recent results of the PALLAS trial suggest that dronedarone should not be used in the long-term treatment of patients with permanent AF.

Suppression of ventricular tachycardia with dronedarone: a case report

 

INTRODUCTION

Dronedarone is a multichannel blocker with similar electrophysiological properties to amiodarone. Dronedarone has not been studied in humans as an agent to suppress ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

This case report describes the dramatic antiarrhythmic effects of dronedarone in a patient with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular tachycardia, which was resistant to multiple antiarrhythmic agents and endocardial catheter ablation.

RESULTS

Dronedarone was effective in completely suppressing ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to establish a potential larger role for dronedarone in controlling ventricular arrhythmias in humans.

A new agent for atrial fibrillation: electrophysiological properties of dronedarone

Although originally synthesized as an antianginal compound, amiodarone has emerged as an effective antiarrhythmic for both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Over the decades, the properties, the effectiveness, the merits as well as the shortcomings of the compound have been well established. The major limitations of this agent are mainly due to the systemic side effects seen with prolonged therapy. Many of the toxic effects observed are primarily caused by the high iodine content present in the amiodarone molecule. Dronedarone, the first noniodinated amiodarone congener, has been developed largely to obtain the antiarrhythmic efficacy in the control of atrial fibrillation without the known adverse side effects of dronedarone. In this part of the supplement, the focus is the electrophysiological effects of dronedarone with the characterization in normal cardiac cells, in animal models of disease, as well as in human studies.

[New developments in the antiarrhythmic therapy of atrial fibrillation]

Atrial fibrillation, which is associated with a worsening of congestive heart failure symptoms, an increased rate of stoke, and increased mortality, is still difficult to treat. New therapies must not only increase effectiveness, but also have to have an improved safety profile, in order to avoid sodium channel block in the ventricle of older patients with atrial fibrillation, and also prevent electrical and morphological remodeling. Dronedarone is less effective compared to amiodarone, but has a better side effect profile which leads to fewer discontinuations of treatment. The atrial ion channels are specifically blocked by a number of prospective antiarrhythmic substances. The most advanced is the testing of vernakalant (RSD1235), which primarily suppresses the I(Kur) current. Ranolazine is a new antianginal substance which influences the atrial ion channels and leads to a significant reduction of atrial and more specifically ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A number of other drugs are in development. They will lead to a better understanding of which form of atrial fibrillation can be best treated with which antiarrhythmic agent.

Augmenting Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm in the Control of Atrial Fibrillation by Antiarrhythmic Drug Combinations

In recent years, a major development in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the use of catheter ablation, and a significant number of patients may benefit from this mode of therapy. On a global scale, it may not be feasible to deal with most patients solely on the basis of ablation. Therefore, it is likely that much of the therapy for AF will continue to rely on antiarrhythmic agents for maintaining sinus rhythm. For many years, amiodarone and sotalol have been the dominant antiarrhythmic agents, with amiodarone being the most effective antiarrhythmic in suppressing AF; however, amiodarone use is limited due to concerns of end-organ toxicity. Upstream therapies, such as statins, fish oil, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers may also provide additive efficacy to these and other membrane-active antiarrhythmics. In recent years, a number of new agents are being developed and the first successful congener of amiodarone, dronedarone, has been shown to be effective in controlling AF and reducing cardiovascular hospitalization. This paper explores the possibility of augmenting the extent of controlling AF by combining multiple potent antiarrhythmic agents old and new.