Angiotensin II receptor blockade: is there truly a benefit of adding an ACE inhibitor?

Fish oil replacement prevents, while docosahexaenoic acid-derived protectin DX mitigates end-stage-renal-disease in atherosclerotic diabetic mice

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) remains the major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We used high-fat/high-sucrose (HFHS)-fed LDLr^-/- /ApoB^100/100 mice with transgenic overexpression of IGFII in pancreatic β-cells (LRKOB100/IGFII) as a model of ESRD to test whether dietary long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids LCω3FA-rich fish oil (FO) could prevent ESRD development. We further evaluated the potential of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-derived pro-resolving lipid mediators, 17-hydroxy-DHA (17-HDHA) and Protectin DX (PDX), to reverse established ESRD damage. HFHS-fed vehicle-treated LRKOB100/IGFII mice developed severe kidney dysfunction leading to ESRD, as revealed by advanced glomerular fibrosis and mesangial expansion along with reduced percent survival. The kidney failure outcome was associated with cardiac dysfunction, revealed by reduced heart rate and prolonged diastolic and systolic time. Dietary FO prevented kidney damage, lean mass loss, cardiac dysfunction, and death. 17-HDHA reduced podocyte foot process effacement while PDX treatment alleviated kidney fibrosis and mesangial expansion as compared to vehicle treatment. Only PDX therapy was effective at preserving the heart function and survival rate. These results show that dietary LCω3FA intake can prevent ESRD and cardiac dysfunction in LRKOB100/IGFII diabetic mice. Our data further reveals that PDX can protect against renal failure and cardiac dysfunction, offering a potential new therapeutic strategy against ESRD.

Renal outcomes of treatment with telmisartan in patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial (JINNAGA)

Objectives:

Although angiotensin II receptor blockers are effective for patients with chronic kidney disease, dose-dependent renoprotective effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease with non-nephrotic proteinuria are not known. Our aim was to elucidate the dose-dependent renoprotective effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers on such patients.

Methods:

A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was conducted from 2009 to 2014. Patients with non-nephrotic stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease were randomized for treatment with either 40 or 80 mg telmisartan and were observed for up to 104 weeks. Overall, 32 and 29 patients were allocated to the 40 and 80 mg telmisartan groups, respectively. The composite primary outcome was renal death, doubling of serum creatinine level, transition to stage 5 chronic kidney disease, and death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included the level of urinary proteins and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Results:

There was no difference in the primary outcome (p = 0.78) and eGFR (p = 0.53) between the two groups; however, after 24 weeks, urinary protein level was significantly lower in the 80 mg group than in the 40 mg group (p < 0.05). No severe adverse events occurred in either group, and the occurrence of adverse events did not significantly differ between them (p = 0.56).

Conclusion:

Our findings do not demonstrate a direct dose-dependent renoprotective effect of telmisartan. The higher telmisartan dose resulted in a decrease in the amount of urinary protein. Even though high-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers may be preferable for patients with stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease, the clinical importance of the study results may be limited. The study was registered in the UMIN-CTR (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr) with the registration number UMIN000040875.

Potential of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Modulations in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Old Players to New Hope!

Due to a tragic increase in the incidences of diabetes globally, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has emerged as one of the leading causes of end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). Hyperglycaemia-mediated overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is key to the development and progression of DKD. Consequently, RAAS inhibition by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is the first-line therapy for the clinical management of DKD. However, numerous clinical and preclinical evidences suggested that RAAS inhibition can only halt the progression of the DKD to a certain extent, and they are inadequate to cure DKD completely. Recent studies have improved understanding of the complexity of the RAAS. It consists of two counter-regulatory arms, the deleterious pressor arm (ACE/angiotensin II/AT1 receptor axis) and the beneficial depressor arm (ACE2/angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas receptor axis). These advances have paved the way for the development of new therapies targeting the RAAS for better treatment of DKD. In this review, we aimed to summarise the involvement of the depressor arm of the RAAS in DKD. Moreover, in modern drug discovery and development, an advance approach is the bispecific therapeutics, targeting two independent signalling pathways. Here, we discuss available reports of these bispecific drugs involving the RAAS as well as propose potential treatments based on neurohormonal balance as credible therapeutic strategies for DKD.

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). However, evidence suggests that the combined use of RAAS blockers may be associated with increased rates of adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to examine the efficacy and safety of dual blockade of the RAAS in patients with DKD.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and January 2018 sourced via the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. RCTs were included if they investigated the efficacy and safety of dual blockade therapy compared with monotherapy in patients with DKD. Random effects models were used in meta-analysis to account for heterogeneities in effect sizes across the reviewed studies. Analyses were stratified by blood pressure and albuminuria. We further conducted subgroup analyses by considering various combinations of RAAS inhibitors.

RESULTS

Based on 42 RCTs with 14,576 patients, dual RAAS blockade therapy was associated with significant decreases in blood pressure, albuminuria, and proteinuria. However, dual therapy was not superior to monotherapy in terms of reductions in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Significant increases in serum potassium and rates of hyperkalemia and hypotension were more common in patients treated with dual therapy. However, glomerular filtration rates (GFR) did not decrease significantly with dual therapy. In subgroup analysis, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) plus an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) or a direct renin inhibitor (DRI) plus an ACEI/ARB did not significantly increase the risk of hyperkalemia, hypotension, and adverse events, and the risk of hypotension increased significantly within the normotensive subgroup but not within the hypertensive subgroup. The risk of hyperkalemia increased significantly in patients with DKD with macroalbuminuria but not in those with microalbuminuria.

CONCLUSION

Dual inhibition therapy is superior to monotherapy for blood pressure control and urine protein reduction, though such superiority does not translate into improvements in longer-term outcomes, such as reduced progression to ESRD, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. An ACEI plus an ARB or a DRI plus an ACEI/ARB may be a safe and effective therapy for patients with DKD, and combination therapy may be suitable for patients with DKD and hypertension and microalbuminuria.

Interactions Between PPARG and AGTR1 Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Hypertension in Chinese Han Population

AIMS

To explore the interactions between PPARG and AGTR1 polymorphisms and their associations with hypertension in the Chinese Han population.

METHODS

Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the PPARG gene and five SNPs of the AGTR1 gene were selected and genotyped in 1591 unrelated Chinese Han adults. The SNPAssoc package of R was used to analyze the associations between the selected SNPs and hypertension. The potential gene-gene interactions between PPARG and AGTR1 genes were tested by model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction (MB-MDR).

RESULTS

The frequencies of the C allele of rs3856806 and the G allele of rs13433696 in the PPARG gene were significantly lower in hypertensive subjects, whereas the A allele of rs9817428 in the PPARG gene was much higher in hypertensives. In addition, individuals with T allele of rs2933249 in the AGTR1 gene displayed a significantly decreased risk of hypertension. MB-MDR analyses suggested that the two-locus model (rs9817428 and rs2933249) and the three-locus model (rs9817428, rs3856806, and rs2933249) were significantly associated with a decreased risk of hypertension. Moreover, among the eight SNPs not individually associated with hypertension (rs12631819, rs2920502, rs1175543, and rs2972164 in the PPARG gene, and rs2638360, rs1492100, rs5182, and rs275646 in the AGTR1 gene), the two-locus model involving rs12631819 and rs5182 demonstrated increased susceptibility to hypertension, and the five-locus model involving rs12631819, rs2920502, rs2972164, rs5182, and rs2638360 demonstrated a significantly decreased risk of hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Polymorphisms in both the PPARG and AGTR1 genes were found to be significantly associated with hypertension. Moreover, there were significant gene-gene interactions identified between the PPARG and AGTR1 genes in relation to hypertension susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.

24-Hour blood pressure response to lower dose (30 mg) fimasartan in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Fimasartan is an angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) which has comparable efficacy and tolerability with other ARBs. The aim of this study was to evaluate 24-hour blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy and the tolerability of the low dose fimasartan compared with valsartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

METHODS

This study was a phase II, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-grouped trial. A total of 75 hypertensive patients, whose mean ambulatory BP monitoring values were ≥ 135/85 mmHg, were randomized to either fimasartan 30 mg or valsartan 80 mg daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) values from the baseline and at the week 8. Secondary endpoints included the change in the mean 24-hour diastolic BP values, the daytime and the nighttime mean BP values at week 8, the trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio and the smoothness index.

RESULTS

At week 8, the mean 24-hour SBP values significantly decreased in both groups; -10.5 ± 11.9 mmHg (p < 0.0001) in the fimasartan group and -5.5 ± 11.6 mmHg (p = 0.0307) in the valsartan group. The difference between two groups was 4.3 ± 2.9 mmHg but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.1392). The global T/P ratio in the fimasartan 30 mg groups were 0.48 and 0.40 in the valsartan 80 mg group, respectively (p = 0.3411). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were acute pharyngitis and there were no cases of severe AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients, low dose (30 mg) fimasartan showed comparable 24-hour BP lowering efficacy compared with valsartan (80 mg). There was no difference in tolerability between two groups.

Dual Blockade of the Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System in Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease

Objective:

To examine the efficacy and safety of dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) among patients with type 2 diabetic kidney disease.

Data Sources:

We searched the major literature repositories, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE, for randomized clinical trials published between January 1990 and October 2015 that compared the efficacy and safety of the use of dual blockade of the RAAS versus the use of monotherapy, without applying any language restrictions. Keywords for the searches included “diabetic nephropathy,” “chronic kidney disease,” “chronic renal insufficiency,” “diabetes mellitus,” “dual therapy,” “combined therapy,” “dual blockade,” “renin-angiotensin system,” “angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor,” “angiotensin-receptor blocker,” “aldosterone blockade,” “selective aldosterone blockade,” “renin inhibitor,” “direct renin inhibitor,” “mineralocorticoid receptor blocker,” etc.

Study Selection:

The selected articles were carefully reviewed. We excluded randomized clinical trials in which the kidney damage of patients was related to diseases other than diabetes mellitus.

Results:

Combination treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor supplemented by an angiotensin II receptor blocking agent is expected to provide a more complete blockade of the RAAS and a better control of hypertension. However, existing literature has presented mixed results, in particular, related to patient safety. In view of this, we conducted a comprehensive literature review in order to explain the rationale for dual blockade of the RAAS, and to discuss the pros and cons.

Conclusions:

Despite the negative results of some recent large-scale studies, it may be immature to declare that the dual blockade is a failure because of the complex nature of the RAAS surrounding its diversified functions and utility. Further trials are warranted to study the combination therapy as an evidence-based practice.

Anti-diabetic and renoprotective effects of aliskiren in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in female rats

Since chronic kidney disease due to diabetic nephropathy (DN) is becoming an ever larger health burden worldwide, more effective therapies are desperately needed. In the present study, the anti-diabetic and renoprotective effects of aliskiren have been evaluated in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DN in rats. DN was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ (65 mg/kg). Three weeks after STZ, rats were divided into four groups; normal, diabetic, diabetic treated with gliclazide (10 mg/kg/day) for 1 month, and diabetic treated with aliskiren (50 mg/kg/day) for 1 month. At the end of the experiment, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Rats were then euthanized and serum was separated for determination of glucose, insulin, kidney function tests, superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), adiponectin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). One kidney was used for estimation of malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH), and nitric oxide (NO) contents. Other kidney was used for histopathological study and immunohistochemical measurement of caspase-3 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). In addition, islets of Langerhans were isolated from normal rats by collagenase digestion technique for in vitro study. Aliskiren normalized STZ-induced hyperglycemia, increased insulin level both in vivo and in vitro, normalized kidney function tests and blood pressure, and alleviated STZ-induced kidney histopathological changes. This could be related to the ability of aliskiren toward preserving hemodynamic changes and alleviating oxidative stress and inflammatory and apoptotic markers induced by STZ in rats. However, aliskiren was more effective than gliclazide in relieving STZ-induced DN. These findings support the beneficial effect of aliskiren treatment in DN which could be attributed to its anti-diabetic, renoprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects. Moreover, clinical studies are required to establish the effectiveness of aliskiren treatment in patients suffering from hypertension and diabetes.

Combined Treatment With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: A Review of the Current Evidence

Several studies have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers are useful in the treatment of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic heart failure, and some types of nephropathy. In this context, dual renin-angiotensin system blockade with both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers may be more effective than treatment with each agent alone. Many clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effect of this combined treatment on proteinuria, hypertension, heart failure, and cardiovascular events. Moreover, these studies demonstrated that dual renin-angiotensin system blockade is generally safe and well tolerated. Long-term studies are under way to confirm these effects and also investigate the effectiveness of dual reninangiotensin system blockade on cerebrovascular disease and prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These studies are expected to define the optimal use of combination treatment in everyday clinical practice. This review considers the most important clinical trials that evaluated the effect of dual renin-angiotensin system blockade on blood pressure, heart failure, and renal function.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Candesartan-controlled, Parallel Group Comparison Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

PURPOSE

A new antihypertensive drug that selectively blocks angiotensin II receptor type 1, fimasartan, has a potent and rapidly acting antihypertensive effect. We investigated the antihypertensive effects of fimasartan 60 and 120 mg and its safety in comparison to 8 mg of candesartan.

METHODS

This clinical trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator, and parallel group study. Three hundred sixty-two individuals were screened, and 290 patients aged 19 to 75 years with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP], 90-110 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to 60 to 120 mg/d of fimasartan or 8 mg/d of candesartan after a 2-week placebo run-in period. Treatments were administered for 12 weeks without dosage adjustment. The primary end point was the differences in DBP changes at week 12.

FINDINGS

After 12 weeks of treatment, DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly in all 3 groups. The decrease in DBP at week 12 was larger but not statistically significant in the fimasartan 60 mg compared with the candesartan 8 mg group with a mean (SD) difference of 1.72 (8.32) mm Hg (95% CI, -0.71 to 4.15 mm Hg; P = 0.17). The lower margin of the CI (-0.71 mm Hg) exceeded the noninferiority margin (-3.5 mm Hg). The DBP-lowering effect of fimasartan 120 mg was also nonsignificantly larger than candesartan 8 mg (difference, 1.58 [8.27] mm Hg; P = 0.20). The decrease in SBP was also nonsignificantly larger in the fimasartan 60 mg group compared with the candesartan 8 mg group (difference, 3.50 [12.63] mm Hg; P = .06). The SBP-lowering effect of fimasartan 120 mg was statistically larger than candesartan 8 mg (difference, 4.98 [13.99] mm Hg; P = .02). Response rate (DBP <90 mm Hg or DBP lowering >10 mm Hg at week 12) was also nonsignificantly greater in both fimasartan groups (Fimasartan 60 mg, 81%; fimasartan 120 mg, 72%; candesartan 8 mg, 71%). The safety profile of the fimasartan 60 mg and 120 mg was similar to candesartan 8 mg, with a slightly higher, but statistically not significant, incidence of hepatic enzyme elevation in fimasartan 120 mg.

IMPLICATIONS

The antihypertensive effect of fimasartan, a newly available angiotensin II receptor type 1 blocker, is comparable, although not superior, to candesartan with a good safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01135212.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade in Diabetic Nephropathy. Present Evidences

Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease in developed countries and its prevalence has increased dramatically in the past few decades. These patients are at an increased risk for premature death, cardiovascular disease, and other severe illnesses that result in frequent hospitalizations and increased health-care utilization. Although much progress has been made in slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy, renal dysfunction and the development of end-stage renal disease remain major concerns in diabetes. Dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) results in progressive renal damage. RAAS blockade is the cornerstone of treatment of DKD, with proven efficacy in many arenas. The theoretically-attractive option of combining these medications that target different points in the pathway, potentially offering a more complete RAAS blockade, has also been tested in clinical trials, but long-term outcomes were disappointing. This review examines the “state of play” for RAAS blockade in DKD, dual blockade of various combinations, and a perspective on its benefits and potential risks.

Additive effects of cilnidipine, an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, and an angiotensin II receptor blocker on reducing cardiorenal damage in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cilnidipine (Cil), which is an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), has been known to provide renal protection by decreasing the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin–angiotensin system. In this study, we compared the effects of the combination of Cil and amlodipine (Aml), which is an L-type CCB, with an angiotensin (Ang) II receptor blocker on diabetic cardiorenal damage in spontaneously type 2 diabetic rats. Seventeen-week-old Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats were randomly assigned to receive Cil, Aml, valsartan (Val), Cil + Val, Aml + Val, or a vehicle (eight rats per group) for 22 weeks. Antihypertensive potencies were nearly equal among the CCB monotherapy groups and the combination therapy groups. The lowering of blood pressure by either treatment did not significantly affect the glycemic variables. However, exacerbations of renal and heart failure were significantly suppressed in rats administered Cil or Val, and additional suppression was observed in those administered Cil + Val. Although Val increased the renin–Ang system, Aml + Val treatment resulted in additional increases in these parameters, while Cil + Val did not show such effects. Furthermore, Cil increased the ratio of Ang-(1–7) to Ang-I, despite the fact that Val and Aml + Val decreased the Ang-(1–7) levels. These actions of Cil + Val might be due to their synergistic inhibitory effect on the activity of the SNS, and on aldosterone secretion through N-type calcium channel antagonism and Ang II receptor type 1 antagonism. Thus, Cil may inhibit the progression of cardiorenal disease in type 2 diabetes patients by acting as an N-type CCB and inhibiting the aldosterone secretion and SNS activation when these drugs were administered in combination with an Ang II receptor blocker.

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a new fixed dose combination

Many patients with hypertension require two or more antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower their blood pressure and attain the therapeutic goals specified in internationally accepted guidelines. Yet, these latter guidelines offer the choice of fixed dose combinations as possible first-step therapies. The angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist telmisartan and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide are two antihypertensive agents that have a well-recognized clinical efficacy. Their combination was shown in randomized, controlled trials to be more effective than each agent alone in lowering blood pressure, due to a dual and synergistic mechanism. Indeed, combining telmisartan with hydrochlorothiazide enhances the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan in almost two-thirds of hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of the combination are similar to monotherapy, and the addition of hydrochlorothiazide to telmisartan does not modify the excellent tolerability profile of the drug.

The effect of RAAS blockade on the progression of diabetic nephropathy

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has a key role in the regulation of blood pressure, sodium and water balance, and cardiovascular and renal homeostasis. In diabetic nephropathy, excessive activation of the RAAS results in progressive renal damage. RAAS blockade using angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers is the cornerstone of treatment of diabetic renal disease. Alternative RAAS-blockade strategies include renin inhibition and aldosterone blockade. Data from small initial studies of these agents are promising. However, single-agent interventions do not fully block the RAAS and patients treated with these therapies remain at high residual renal risk. Approaches to optimize drug responses include dietary changes and increasing dosages. The theoretically attractive option of combining different RAAS interventions has also been tested in clinical trials but long-term outcomes were disappointing. However, dual RAAS blockade might represent a good therapeutic option for specific patients. A better knowledge of the pathophysiology of the RAAS is crucial to fully understand the mechanisms of action of RAAS blockers and to exploit their renoprotective effects. Moreover, lifestyle interventions or diagnostic tools might be used to optimize RAAS blockade and identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from the therapy.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of losartan

INTRODUCTION

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is one of the major therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with essential hypertension, congestive heart failure and diabetic as well as non-diabetic renal diseases. As the first angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on the market, losartan belongs to the most frequently prescribed ARB.

AREA COVERED

The present review examines the pharmacokinetics of losartan with a special discussion on the dose of losartan that should be used in clinical practice to obtain the maximal benefits of the drug. Readers are provided with arguments suggesting that the dose of 50 mg losartan is probably too low and that losartan should preferably be prescribed at the dose of 100 mg/day or higher.

EXPERT OPINION

Losartan is an effective antagonist of angiotensin II AT(1) receptors which has been shown to provide important clinical benefits in patients with hypertension, congestive heart failure and renal diseases. Losartan should be prescribed at the dose of 100 mg/day and the use of higher doses should be reconsidered in future studies to improve its clinical efficacy.

Effects of an N-type calcium antagonist on angiotensin II-renin feedback

BACKGROUND

Interrupting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) has been found to induce RAS overactivation. In this study, we investigated the effect of 2 calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine (L-/N-type CCB) and amlodipine (L-type CCB), on the RAS activation induced by an ARB in a strain of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR/Izm, 10 weeks of age).

METHODS

Rats intravenously catheterized for blood collection were randomly divided into groups that were administered the vehicle, the ARB valsartan or valsartan combined with one of the 2 CCBs. Their blood and kidneys were collected 270 min after administration.

RESULTS

Valsartan increased the plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) level in a dose-dependent manner. Cilnidipine suppressed the increase in plasma renin activity and plasma Ang II levels induced by valsartan, but amlodipine did not. Combined administration of cilnidipine, but not amlodipine, and valsartan significantly reduced the noradrenaline content in the renal cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the suppressive effect of cilnidipine on the valsartan-induced increase in RAS activity can be partly explained by its sympatholytic action mediated by N-type calcium channel blockade, and that combined administration of cilnidipine and valsartan might provide a synergistic therapeutic effect.

Blocking the RAAS at different levels: an update on the use of the direct renin inhibitors alone and in combination

The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), an important regulator of blood pressure and mediator of hypertension-related complications, is a prime target for cardiovascular drug therapy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were the first drugs to be used to block the RAAS. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have also been shown to be equally effective for treatment. Although these drugs are highly effective and are widely used in the management of hypertension, current treatment regimens with ACEIs and ARBs are unable to completely suppress the RAAS. Combinations of ACEIs and ARBs have been shown to be superior than to either agent alone for some, but certainly not all, composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, but dual RAAS blockade with the combination of an ACEI and an ARB is sometimes associated with an increase in the risk for adverse events, primarily hyperkalemia and worsening renal function. The recent introduction of the direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, has made available new combination strategies to obtain a more complete blockade of the RAAS with fewer adverse events. Renin system blockade with aliskiren and another RAAS agent has been, and still is, the subject of many large-scale clinical trials and furthermore, is already available in some countries as a fixed combination.

Current status of dual Renin Angiotensin aldosterone system blockade for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

Clinical and experimental studies have shown that the initial suppression of angiotensin II after the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is later reversed and returns almost to pretreatment levels. This raised the hypothesis of the "escape phenomenon," which was strengthened by the discovery that angiotensin II can also be generated through non-ACEs. Therefore, the addition of angiotensin receptor blockers to ACE inhibitors would produce additional benefits by blocking all angiotensin II at the angiotensin II receptor type 1 level and in addition allowing angiotensin II to stimulate the unoccupied angiotensin II receptor type 2, causing additional vasodilation and antiremodeling effects. However, analysis of various studies including hypertension, heart failure, and renal disease has demonstrated that the gain is modest when combining ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or the renin blocker aliskiren. In conclusion, on the basis of the results of this analysis, dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system should not be used for the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, and renal disease, with perhaps the exception of diabetic nephropathy with albuminuria, until additional information is provided from ongoing studies.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: beyond the ACE inhibitor and angiotensin-II receptor blocker combination

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), an important regulator of blood pressure as well as fluid and electrolyte balance, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and kidney diseases. Blockade of the RAAS with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-II (ANG-II) receptor blockers (ARBs) lowers blood pressure, decreases morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure, and decreases proteinuria and the rate of decline in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Although these drugs are highly effective and are widely used in the management of cardiovascular and kidney diseases, current treatment regimens with ACEIs and ARBs may not completely suppress the RAAS. Combinations of ACEIs and ARBs have been shown to be superior to either agent alone for some, but certainly not all, composite cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. With the growing appreciation of the role of aldosterone in the pathogenesis of cardiorenal diseases and the recent approval of the direct renin inhibitor (DRI), aliskiren, additional combination strategies have emerged that may offer novel ways to more fully suppress the RAAS. This review examines what is presently known about ACEI/ARB combination therapy and explores alternative combination strategies that include DRIs and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers (MRBs).

Efficacy in angiotensin receptor blockade: a comparative review of data with olmesartan

A range of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) is available, and analyses suggest there are differences between agents in terms of antihypertensive efficacy and 24-hour blood pressure control.This review assesses the data comparing olmesartan with other ARBs in terms of blood pressure reductions, goal achievement, 24-hour control and speed of onset. Olmesartan seems to have a more favourable efficacy profile relative to standard doses of the ARBs used in comparative studies; results consistent with the high degree of blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor for olmesartan.Taken together, there might be differences between ARBs regarding their blood pressure lowering efficacy, and these results may provide further support of the benefits of olmesartan therapy since choice of an effective agent is crucial in antihypertensive therapy.

Combination renin-angiotensin system blockade with the renin inhibitor aliskiren in hypertension

Combining an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) lowers blood pressure (BP) by 4/3 mmHg compared to either agent alone, although this additive effect may be abolished with maximal monotherapy dosing. The recent ONTARGET study showed no reduction in primary outcomes when an ACE-I-ARB combination was compared to an ACE-I alone, despite 2.4/1.4 mmHg lower BP in the former group. In proteinuric chronic kidney disease, an ACE-I-ARB combination reduces proteinuria and disease progression more than monotherapy, but the ONTARGET study showed an increase in renal endpoints in the combined group. Aliskiren offers a novel approach to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition. As monotherapy in hypertension, aliskiren is of similar efficacy to thiazides, calcium channel blockers and ARBs. In combination with other RAS inhibitors at maximal dosage aliskiren has a small synergistic effect on BP (additional 4/2 mmHg reduction). Early data suggest a role for aliskiren in preventing end-organ damage but, considering the ONTARGET results with an ACE-I-ARB combination, outcome studies are needed before the use of aliskiren can be recommended in combination with other RAS inhibitors. As monotherapy, aliskiren should probably be reserved for use as an alternative to ACE-Is or ARBs, where these are ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Aliskiren, the first approved renin inhibitor: Clinical application and safety in the treatment of hypertension

Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for, and causes of, cardiovascular disease. The difficulty in achieving a normal blood pressure range in some patients makes the rate of cardiovascular disease high. For some years renin-angiotensin system inhibitors such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockade have been objects of interest for treatment of cardiovascular disease. Aliskiren, the first approved renin inhibitor to reach the market, is a low molecular weight, orally active, hydrophilic nonpeptide molecule, which blocks angiotensin I generation. However it might also become a reasonable therapeutic choice in a broad number of clinical conditions, as stable coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular and cardiorenal disease, diabetes, and peripheral arterial disease. The aim of this review is to describe the effectiveness and safety of aliskerin in the treatment of hypertension.

Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with high-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for nephroprotection: an open, controlled, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

Despite the proven effectiveness of combination therapy with an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) for the prevention and treatment of kidney disease, it has not proved possible to inhibit the progress of chronic nephropathies completely. To improve renal outcome one may consider using increased dosages of ACEI above those usually recommended for hypertension.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized, open, controlled study was conducted to evaluate the influence of two combination therapies on proteinuria, markers of tubular injury and renal fibrosis. A total of 18 patients with a creatinine level of 109+/-36 micromol/l and proteinuria of 0.97+/-0.76 g/24 h were enrolled in the study. In the 8-week run-in period, an ACEI (cilazapril 5 mg once-daily) and an ARB (telmisartan 80 mg once-daily) were administered to achieve the target blood pressure of < or = 130/80 mmHg. Next, the patients were randomly assigned to either an increased dose of cilazapril (10 mg) or the previous dose (5 mg) in two active-treatment periods, each lasting 8 weeks.

RESULTS

A significant increase in renin activity was observed after administration of cilazapril 10 mg (6.46+/-1.12 vs 4.67+/-0.7 ng/ml/h; p=0.028). Proteinuria, urine excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and alpha1-microglobulin and amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

An increased dosage of cilazapril (twice the maximum recommended dose) in addition to combination therapy with telmisartan was associated with increased blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with no additional effect on proteinuria, markers of tubular injury or renal fibrosis.

Review: Renal protection by inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition exerts a renoprotective effect independent of blood pressure reduction. Many studies using an end-point of proteinuria compared the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy with combination ACE-I/ARB therapy. Despite methodological limitations, most studies suggest that combination therapy provides a greater antiproteinuric effect than monotherapy, perhaps because of more prolonged and complete RAAS inhibition. COOPERATE and ONTARGET used more robust end-points to study renoprotective effects. In COOPERATE, combination therapy resulted in significantly longer times to doubling serum creatinine or developing end-stage renal disease than trandolapril or losartan monotherapy. However, a secondary ONTARGET finding was that combination therapy significantly increased the risk for renal dysfunction compared with ramipril or telmisartan alone. Eventually, the VA NEPHRON-D trial should provide definitive data relating to patients with diabetic nephropathy. Results of AVOID suggest the renoprotective benefits of combination therapy extend to the direct renin inhibitors (DRI). In AVOID, combination therapy with aliskiren, a DRI, and losartan resulted in 20% greater protein excretion decrement than losartan monotherapy. Future trials should examine higher RAAS inhibitor doses, facilitate differentiation of renoprotective and antihypertensive effects of RAAS blockade, and use end-points that robustly demonstrate renoprotective effects.

On target to dual block RAS?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are thought to possess cardioprotective, cerebroprotective, and nephroprotective properties. Both classes of agents can prevent or reverse endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis, thereby potentially reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Such a reduction has been shown with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease, but no such data are scarce with angiotensin receptor blockers (Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction study). Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have been shown to reduce damage in target organs, such as the heart and kidney, and to decrease cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with congestive heart failure. These drugs (especially angiotensin receptor blockers) may successfully prevent atrial fibrillation and play a protective role in metabolic syndrome. In some clinical settings, combined therapy angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with angiotensin receptor blocker (double blockade of the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system) may appear the most effective.

Aliskiren fails to lower blood pressure in patients who have either low PRA levels or whose PRA falls insufficiently or reactively rises

BACKGROUND

Suppressed baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) levels or large reactive increases in renin secretion are two possible reasons for treatment failure with antirenin system drugs.

METHODS

To investigate their prevalence we reanalyzed data from three published clinical trials of the renin inhibitor aliskiren.

RESULTS

Aliskiren failed to lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) by at least 10 mm Hg in half of all patients. It was very effective in two-thirds of medium- to high-renin patients (-19 mm Hg). But BP did not fall in most low-renin patients, or in 30% of medium- to high-renin patients. BP actually rose by >10 mm Hg in 5% of patients taking aliskiren and in >10% of patients when aliskiren was added to an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). PRA changed in parallel with BP. Although PRA fell in most patients, it actually rose in 5% and in up to 30% when aliskiren was added to an ARB or ACEI.

CONCLUSIONS

There are two reasons for treatment failure with aliskiren. Many hypertensive patients have large BP falls. But, BP does not fall in most low-renin patients or in medium- to high-renin patients whose PRA levels do not fall sufficiently. If the concept of that treatment resistance is caused by excessive reactive increases in renin secretion is confirmed, then a PRA determination during treatment could be used to guide subsequent addition or subtraction of either natriuretic or antirenin drug types, to thereby correct BP and reduce cardiovascular risk.

Current possibilities of ACE inhibitor and ARB combination in arterial hypertension and its complications

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a crucial role in blood pressure regulation and hypertension-related complications. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were the first to be used to block the RAAS and now have many compelling indications in the treatment of hypertension and its cardiovascular and renal complications. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), introduced 20 years later, have been shown to be equally as effective as antihypertensive treatment and are also associated with a lower number of side effects. Furthermore, in clinical trials ARBs and ACEIs were associated with comparable benefits for their most typical indications. This was confirmed in the 2007 New European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines for the management of hypertension by comparable specific recommendations for ARB and ACEI treatment. There is sufficient theoretical background and, in some cases, also clinical evidence that combination therapy with ACEIs and ARBs may be more beneficial than monotherapy with either of the groups alone, both in uncomplicated hypertension and with concomitant heart failure or renal dysfunction. However, the combination of ACEI and ARB was not recommended in the ESH/ESC 2007 Guidelines. This may change after the publication of the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End point Trial (ONTARGET) study, the preliminary results of which have just been presented. In heart failure, recent studies have shown that the combination of ACEI and ARB decreases cardiovascular mortality and the number of hospitalizations due to aggravation of heart failure. These results have been reflected in the newest ESC guidelines of the heart failure treatment. Nephroprotective properties of the combination of ACEs and ARBs have been proved both in studies on nondiabetic and diabetic nephropathy. The potential benefits, indications in prespecified groups of patients, the most recent data from clinical trials and latest research regarding dual blockade of RAAS will be reviewed in this article.

Aldosterone and TGF-beta1 synergistically increase PAI-1 and decrease matrix degradation in rat renal mesangial and fibroblast cells

Aldosterone is thought to modulate renal fibrosis, in part, through increasing plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), a major inhibitor of ECM degradation. The present study investigated aldosterone effects on PAI-1 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta(1) and asked whether PAI-1 effects were TGF-beta mediated and whether aldosterone and TGF-beta(1) acted synergistically to increase PAI-1 and decrease ECM degradation. Rat mesangial cells (MCs) and fibroblast cells [normal rat kidney (NRK)-49F] were used. (3)H-labeled ECM was produced by MCs. The effect of aldosterone and TGF-beta on ECM degradation by newly plated MCs or NRK-49F was measured by the release of (3)H into medium. Aldosterone markedly increased PAI-1 mRNA and protein in both cell types, increases completely blocked by spironolactone and partially blocked by TGF-beta neutralizing antibody. Adding both aldosterone and TGF-beta(1) produced PAI-1 mRNA and protein increases higher than the sum of increases seen with either compound alone. Aldosterone or TGF-beta(1) alone inhibited matrix degradation by 39 and 49% in MCs and 21 and 23% in NRK-49F, respectively. When both compounds were added, matrix degradation was further decreased by 93% in MCs and 61% in NRK-49F. The results indicate that aldosterone-induced PAI-1 increases are partially mediated by TGF-beta(1) and lead to decreased ECM degradation. While aldosterone alone induced TGF-beta(1) weakly, aldosterone and TGF-beta(1) added together produced dramatic synergistic effects on PAI-1 production and subsequent ECM accumulation. Thus the elevated aldosterone induced by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation may amplify renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system profibrotic actions.

Are two better than one? Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors plus angiotensin receptor blockers for reducing blood pressure and proteinuria in kidney disease

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers each reduce proteinuria and blood pressure. Several studies have compared the antiproteinuric and antihypertensive effects of combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers with those of therapy with either drug class alone. This article reviews those trials as well as evidence suggesting a mechanism for the benefits observed with combination therapy.

Rationale for Combining Blockers of the Renin-Angiotensin System

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT1-receptor (AT1R) blockers has become one of the most successful therapeutic approaches in medicine. The question is no longer whether RAS inhibition helps, but rather how we can optimize inhibition to achieve optimal cardiovascular and renal protection. Indeed, numerous data have shown that the RAS is not blocked fully over 24 hours with current doses of RAS blockers because they trigger a counter-regulatory renin release that can offset pharmacologic inhibition of the RAS. This absence of full blockade may have clinical implications. Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and AT1R antagonists thus has been proposed to inhibit the biological effects of the reactive renin release triggered by single-site RAS inhibition. By using this approach, numerous experimental and clinical studies have suggested that this combination therapy has additive or synergistic effects on blood pressure and on the prevention of cardiovascular and renal lesions. Although similar intensity of RAS blockade can be achieved by either combination therapy or by using high doses of an AT1-receptor antagonist given alone, the ACE inhibitor present in the combination interferes with the bradykinin-nitric oxide pathway and the N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro metabolism, which both may have additional biological effects.

Functional renin receptors in renal mesangial cells

Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and generation of angiotensin II (Ang II) play a crucial role in fibrotic renal disease beyond this system's hemodynamic actions. Ang II blockade was a great therapeutic breakthrough for renal and cardiovascular diseases; however, this slows, but does not stop, disease progression. These limitations leave other molecules unopposed to sustain disease progression. One is renin, which is markedly elevated by Ang II blockade. Recently, a new renin receptor was cloned in renal mesangial cells. This receptor acts as a renin/prorenin cofactor on the cell surface, enhancing efficiency of angiotensinogen cleavage by renin and unmasking prorenin catalytic activity. Unexpectedly, the receptor induces angiotensin-independent cellular effects in renal mesangial cells, suggesting that renin has novel receptor-mediated actions that could play a role in renal fibrosis. Proof of this could lead to a pharmacological compound blocking renin/prorenin binding and activity as an alternative or adjunct to classical inhibitors of the RAS.

Effect of dual blockade of renin–angiotensin system on TGFβ1 and left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients

The effects of 24 weeks losartan and ramipril treatment, both alone and in combination, on left ventricular mass (LVM), circulating transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1), procollagen type I (PIP) and III (PIIIP), have been evaluated in hypertensive (HT) patients. A total of 57 HT with stage 1 and 2 essential hypertension were included. After 4 weeks run in, a randomized double-blind, three arms, double dummy, independent trial was used. All HT patients were randomly allocated to three treatment arms consisting of losartan (50 mg/daily), ramipril (5 mg/ daily) and combined (losartan 50 mg/daily + ramipril 5 mg/daily) for 24 weeks. TGFbeta1, PIP and PIIIP, LVM, LVM/h(2.7) and other echocardiographic measurements, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and clearance and potassium were determined after run in and after 24 weeks. All groups were comparable for gender, age, body mass index, blood pressure and LVM. The prevalence of baseline left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was not significantly different among three groups. At the end of treatment, a significant (P<0.05) reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), TGFbeta1, PIP, PIIIP, LVM and LVM/h(2.7) was observed in all groups. The absolute and percent reduction in TGFbeta1 and LVM/h(2.7) were significantly higher in combined than losartan or ramipril groups and also in HT patients with LVH. No significant change in absolute and percent reduction of SBP, DBP and MBP were found. Our data indicate an additional cardioprotective effect of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin in HT patients.

Renin inhibition with aliskiren: where are we now, and where are we going?

With the development of aliskiren, blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at the level of the interaction of renin with a substrate has become a clinical reality. This review covers the specific features of the first agent likely to achieve widespread clinical exposure, aliskiren. The potential of renin inhibition must be viewed in the context of the remarkable efficacy of both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The implications of blockade of the renin system at its rate-limiting step are reviewed, with the therapeutic implications for both the renin inhibitor employed alone or the renin inhibitor combined with an ACE inhibitor or ARB. The relevant and necessary studies are ongoing.

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a key therapeutic strategy to reduce renal and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes

Diabetes (particularly type 2 diabetes) represents a global health problem of epidemic proportions. Individuals with diabetes are not only more likely to develop hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, but are also at a significantly higher risk for coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Angiotensin II plays a key pathophysiological role in the progression of diabetic renal disease, and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II antagonists has therefore become an important therapeutic strategy to reduce renal and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Several studies have demonstrated the effects of angiotensin II antagonists on the reduction of albuminuria and the progression of renal disease from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria. More importantly, several endpoint trials have shown that the antiproteinuric effects of losartan and irbesartan translate into cardiovascular and renoprotective benefits beyond blood pressure lowering, thereby delaying the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation by several years. These and other studies indicate that angiotensin II antagonists not only improve survival and quality of life of patients with diabetic nephropathy, but also have the potential to reduce the substantial healthcare burden associated with managing these patients. ACEi also appear to exert similar beneficial effects in diabetic patients, but whether clinically significant differences in renoprotection or mortality exist between angiotensin II antagonists and ACEi in patients with type 2 diabetes remains to be fully investigated in appropriate head-to-head studies.