2019 George Lyman Duff Memorial Lecture: Three Decades of Examining DNA in Patients With Dyslipidemia

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with chylomicronemia syndromes

BACKGROUND

Chylomicronemia syndrome is a form of severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) caused by the familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) or multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been associated with components of the metabolic syndrome and is more prevalent in subjects with elevated triglycerides.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare the prevalence of hepatic steatosis assessed by conventional imaging between HTG groups (FSC, MCS and moderate HTG (mHTG)). The secondary objective was to determine the difference in the prevalence of liver fibrosis.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study was performed on adult patients from the lipid clinic of the Montreal Clinical Research Institute (IRCM). We retrospectively reviewed the imaging reports available in the patients' files for signs of NAFLD. We also used the FIB-4 index as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

We reviewed the medical files of 300 patients; 22 with FCS, 82 with MCS and 196 with mHTG. There was significantly more hepatic steatosis in the MCS group compared to the mHTG and FCS groups (79%, 66% and 43% respectively p=0.02). There was a significantly higher prevalence of subjects within the "unlikely fibrosis" category in the mHTG group (91%) compared to the MCS (84%) and FCS groups (59%), p=0.0004.

CONCLUSION

We found that the prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 3-, 2.5-, and 2-fold higher in MCS, mHTG and FCS patients than in the general population. This suggests that patients with elevated triglycerides, regardless of the underlying etiology, are at higher risk of hepatic steatosis and NAFLD.

Role of lipoprotein lipase activity measurement in the diagnosis of familial chylomicronemia syndrome

BACKGROUND

Activity assays for lipoprotein lipase (LPL) are not standardised for use in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to define and validate a cut-off points based on a ROC curve for the diagnosis of patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS). We also evaluated the role of LPL activity in a comprehensive FCS diagnostic workflow.

METHODS

A derivation cohort (including an FCS group (n = 9), a multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) group (n = 11)), and an external validation cohort (including an FCS group (n = 5), a MCS group (n = 23) and a normo-triglyceridemic (NTG) group (n = 14)), were studied. FCS patients were previously diagnosed by the presence of biallelic pathogenic genetic variants in the LPL and GPIHBP1 genes. LPL activity was also measured. Clinical and anthropometric data were recorded, and serum lipids and lipoproteins were measured. Sensitivity, specificity and cut-offs for LPL activity were obtained from a ROC curve and externally validated.

RESULTS

All post-heparin plasma LPL activity in the FCS patients were below 25.1 mU/mL, that was cut-off with best performance. There was no overlap in the LPL activity distributions between the FCS and MCS groups, conversely to the FCS and NTG groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in addition to genetic testing, LPL activity in subjects with severe hypertriglyceridemia is a reliable criterium in the diagnosis of FCS when using a cut-off of 25.1 mU/mL (25% of the mean LPL activity in the validation MCS group). We do not recommend the NTG patient based cut-off values due to low sensitivity.

The advantages and pitfalls of genetic analysis in the diagnosis and management of lipid disorders

The increasing affordability of and access to next-generation DNA sequencing has increased the feasibility of incorporating genetic analysis into the diagnostic pathway for dyslipidaemia. But should genetic diagnosis be used routinely? DNA testing for any medical condition has potential benefits and pitfalls. For dyslipidaemias, the overall balance of advantages versus drawbacks differs according to the main lipid disturbance. For instance, some patients with severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels have a monogenic disorder, namely heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In these patients, DNA diagnosis can be definitive, in turn yielding several benefits for patient care that tend to outweigh any potential disadvantages. In contrast, hypertriglyceridaemia is almost always a polygenic condition without a discrete monogenic basis, except for ultrarare monogenic familial chylomicronaemia syndrome. Genetic testing in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia is therefore predominantly non-definitive and evidence for benefit is presently lacking. Here we consider advantages and limitations of genetic testing in dyslipidaemias.

Genetic testing in dyslipidaemia: An approach based on clinical experience

We have used DNA sequencing in our lipid clinic for >20 years. Dyslipidaemia is typically ascertained biochemically. For moderate deviations in the lipid profile, the etiology is often a combination of a polygenic susceptibility component plus secondary non-genetic factors. For severe dyslipidaemia, a monogenic etiology is more likely, although a discrete single-gene cause is frequently not found. A severe phenotype can also result from strong polygenic predisposition that is aggravated by secondary factors. A young age of onset plus a family history of dyslipidaemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease can suggest a monogenic etiology. With severe dyslipidaemia, clinical examination focuses on detecting manifestations of monogenic syndromic conditions. For all patients with dyslipidaemia, secondary causes must be ruled out. Here we describe an experience-based practical approach to genetic testing of patients with severe deviations of low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein and also combined hyperlipidaemia and dysbetalipoproteinemia.

A Modern Approach to Dyslipidemia

Lipid disorders involving derangements in serum cholesterol, triglycerides, or both are commonly encountered in clinical practice and often have implications for cardiovascular risk and overall health. Recent advances in knowledge, recommendations, and treatment options have necessitated an updated approach to these disorders. Older classification schemes have outlived their usefulness, yielding to an approach based on the primary lipid disturbance identified on a routine lipid panel as a practical starting point. Although monogenic dyslipidemias exist and are important to identify, most individuals with lipid disorders have polygenic predisposition, often in the context of secondary factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. With regard to cardiovascular disease, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is essentially causal, and clinical practice guidelines worldwide have recommended treatment thresholds and targets for this variable. Furthermore, recent studies have established elevated triglycerides as a cardiovascular risk factor, whereas depressed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol now appears less contributory than was previously believed. An updated approach to diagnosis and risk assessment may include measurement of secondary lipid variables such as apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a), together with selective use of genetic testing to diagnose rare monogenic dyslipidemias such as familial hypercholesterolemia or familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The ongoing development of new agents-especially antisense RNA and monoclonal antibodies-targeting dyslipidemias will provide additional management options, which in turn motivates discussion on how best to incorporate them into current treatment algorithms.

The Evolving Story of Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS or type V hyperlipoproteinemia) is the most frequent cause of severe hypertriglyceridemia and is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The estimated prevalence of MCS in the North American population is 1:600–1:250 and is increasing due to the increasing prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Differentiating between familial chylomicronemia syndrome and MCS is crucial due to their very different treatments. In recent years, several cohort studies have helped to differentiate these two conditions, and recent evidence suggests that MCS itself is a heterogeneous condition. This mini-review will summarize recent literature on MCS, with a specific focus on the genetic determinants of the metabolic risk and the latest developments concerning the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for these patients. Possible research directions in this field will also be discussed.

Sortilin enhances secretion of apolipoprotein(a) through effects on apolipoprotein B secretion and promotes uptake of lipoprotein(a)

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Lp(a) is formed in or on hepatocytes from successive noncovalent and covalent interactions between apo(a) and apoB, although the subcellular location of these interactions and the nature of the apoB-containing particle involved remain unclear. Sortilin, encoded by the SORT1 gene, modulates apoB secretion and LDL clearance. We used a HepG2 cell model to study the secretion kinetics of apo(a) and apoB. Overexpression of sortilin increased apo(a) secretion, while siRNA-mediated knockdown of sortilin expression correspondingly decreased apo(a) secretion. Sortilin binds LDL but not apo(a) or Lp(a), indicating that its effect on apo(a) secretion is likely indirect. Indeed, the effect was dependent on the ability of apo(a) to interact noncovalently with apoB. Overexpression of sortilin enhanced internalization of Lp(a), but not apo(a), by HepG2 cells, although neither sortilin knockdown in these cells or Sort1 deficiency in mice impacted Lp(a) uptake. We found several missense mutations in SORT1 in patients with extremely high Lp(a) levels; sortilin containing some of these mutations was more effective at promoting apo(a) secretion than WT sortilin, though no differences were found with respect to Lp(a) internalization. Our observations suggest that sortilin could play a role in determining plasma Lp(a) levels and corroborate in vivo human kinetic studies which imply that secretion of apo(a) and apoB are coupled, likely within the hepatocyte.

Endothelial lipase mediates efficient lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) are circulating reservoirs of fatty acids used as vital energy sources for peripheral tissues. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a predominant enzyme mediating triglyceride (TG) lipolysis and TRL clearance to provide fatty acids to tissues in animals. Physiological and human genetic evidence support a primary role for LPL in hydrolyzing TRL TGs. We hypothesized that endothelial lipase (EL), another extracellular lipase that primarily hydrolyzes lipoprotein phospholipids may also contribute to TRL metabolism. To explore this, we studied the impact of genetic EL loss-of-function on TRL metabolism in humans and mice. Humans carrying a loss-of-function missense variant in LIPG, p.Asn396Ser (rs77960347), demonstrated elevated plasma TGs and elevated phospholipids in TRLs, among other lipoprotein classes. Mice with germline EL deficiency challenged with excess dietary TG through refeeding or a high-fat diet exhibited elevated TGs, delayed dietary TRL clearance, and impaired TRL TG lipolysis in vivo that was rescued by EL reconstitution in the liver. Lipidomic analyses of postprandial plasma from high-fat fed Lipg-/- mice demonstrated accumulation of phospholipids and TGs harboring long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), known substrates for EL lipolysis. In vitro and in vivo, EL and LPL together promoted greater TG lipolysis than either extracellular lipase alone. Our data positions EL as a key collaborator of LPL to mediate efficient lipolysis of TRLs in humans and mice.

Rare Variants in Triglycerides-Related Genes Increase Pancreatitis Risk in Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

CONTEXT

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglycerides [TG] concentration ≥10 mmol/L) can be caused by multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) or familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS). Both conditions are associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. The clinical differences between MCS patients with or without a rare variant in TG-related genes have never been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and biochemical characteristics of FCS, positive-MCS patients, and negative-MCS patients, as well as to investigate the predictors of acute pancreatitis in MCS patients.

METHODS

All patients referred at the clinic for severe hypertriglyceridemia underwent genetic testing for the 5 canonical genes involved in TG metabolism (LPL, APOC2, GPIHBP1, APOA5, and LMF1) using next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 53 variant negative-MCS, 22 variant positive-MCS and 28 FCS subjects were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. A significant difference was observed in the prevalence of pancreatitis (9%, 41%, and 61%) and multiple pancreatitis (6%, 23%, and 46%) in the negative-MCS, the positive-MCS, and the FCS groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Predictors of pancreatitis among MCS subjects included the presence of a rare variant, lower apolipoprotein B, as well as higher gamma-glutamyl transferase, maximal TG value, and fructose consumption.

CONCLUSION

We observed that the MCS individuals who carried a rare variant have an intermediate phenotype between FCS and negative-MCS subjects. Since novel molecules such as the antisense oligonucleotide against APOC3 mRNA showed high efficacy in reducing TG levels in patients with multifactorial chylomicronemia, identification of higher-risk MCS patients who would benefit from additional treatment is essential.