1
|
Vallée A, Rahmouni K, Ponnambalam M, Issa H, Ruel M. Left main revascularization guidelines: navigating the data. Curr Opin Cardiol 2024; 39:437-443. [PMID: 38904280 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article explores recent developments in left main revascularization, with a focus on appraising the latest American and European guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS Recent pooled data analysis from four major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for left main coronary artery stenosis indicate an advantage for CABG over PCI in regard to freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events, despite no significant difference in mortality observed at 5 years. Additional data support the use of CABG for patients with left ventricular dysfunction, complex left main lesions, diffuse coronary disease, and diabetes. SUMMARY The data underpinning the guidelines on each revascularization modality (PCI versus CABG) must consider factors such as lesion complexity, diabetes, and left ventricular dysfunction. Additionally, the findings of the four major RCTs upon which the guidelines are based must be ascertained in light of the latest advancements in these revascularization techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelien Vallée
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Department, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, GHPSJ, Le Plessis Robinson, France
| | - Kenza Rahmouni
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Menaka Ponnambalam
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hugo Issa
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Ruel
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhuang B, Li S, Wang H, Chen W, Ren Y, Zhang H, Sun Z, Xu L. Incremental prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING 2024:10.1007/s10554-024-03198-5. [PMID: 39093366 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03198-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant global health issue, particularly when complicated by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%. Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended for such cases, the unclear prognosis necessitates further investigation. METHOD This retrospective study aimed to determine whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides additional prognostic value in guiding effective clinical management. The study included patients with CAD and LVEF < 35% who underwent CABG surgery after enhanced CMR between March 2016 and March 2023. CMR was performed using a 3.0T scanner with steady-state free precession and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences. Prognostic analysis of clinical and CMR data was conducted, with the endpoint defined as cardiovascular death, revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, or stroke. Statistical analysis included Student's t-test, chi-squared test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic analysis, Harrell C statistical analysis, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis. RESULT The study included 152 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 9.7 years; 138 men). During a mean follow-up of 2.0 years, 8 patients experienced cardiovascular death, while 1 case had revascularization, 13 had hospitalization for heart failure, and 11 had a stroke. Left atrial diameter index (LADi) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.15]; P = 0.04) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) mass (HR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.01-1.06]; P < 0.001) were associated with the endpoint, even after adjusting for multiple clinical variables. Adding LADi and LGE mass improved risk prediction for adverse events, as indicated by the C-index (0.738, p < 0.01), IDI (0.36), and NRI (0.13). CONCLUSION Left atrial diameter index (LADi) and scar burden are valuable prognostic indicators in patients with LVEF < 35% undergoing CABG. They offer enhanced risk stratification beyond traditional clinical factors, highlighting their importance in guiding clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baiyan Zhuang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Ren
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongkai Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhonghua Sun
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Science, Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Lei Xu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno-Angarita A, Peña D, de León JDLP, Estacio M, Vila LP, Muñoz MI, Cadavid-Alvear E. Current indications and surgical strategies for myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a scoping review. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19:469. [PMID: 39068469 PMCID: PMC11282776 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02844-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) accounts for more than 60% of congestive heart failure cases and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% aims to improve survival and quality of life and reduce complications associated with heart failure and coronary artery disease. The majority of randomized clinical trials have consistently excluded those patients, resulting in evidence primarily derived from observational studies. MAIN BODY We performed a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology in five stages: 1) formulating the research question; 2) locating relevant studies; 3) choosing studies; 4) organizing and extracting data; and 5) compiling, summarizing, and presenting the findings. This literature review covers primary studies and systematic reviews focusing on surgical revascularization strategies in adult patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or lower. Through an extensive search of Medline and the Cochrane Library, a systematic review was conducted to address three questions regarding myocardial revascularization in these patients. These questions outline the current knowledge on this topic, current surgical strategies (off-pump vs. on-pump), and graft options (including hybrid techniques) utilized for revascularization. Three independent reviewers (MAE, DP, and AM) applied the inclusion criteria to all the included studies, obtaining the full texts of the most relevant studies. The reviewers subsequently assessed these articles to make the final decision on their inclusion in the review. Out of the initial 385 references, 156 were chosen for a detailed review. After examining the full articles were examined, 134 were found suitable for scoping review. CONCLUSION The literature notes the scarcity of surgical revascularization in LVD patients in randomized studies, with observational data supporting coronary revascularization's benefits. ONCABG is recommended for multivessel disease in LVD with LVEF < 35%, while OPCAB is proposed for older, high-risk patients. Strategies like internal thoracic artery skeletonization harvesting and postoperative glycemic control mitigate risks with BITA in uncontrolled diabetes. Total arterial revascularization maximizes long-term survival, and hybrid revascularization offers advantages like shorter hospital stays and reduced costs for significant LAD lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Moreno-Angarita
- Fundación Valle del Lili - Departamento de Cirugía - Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Carrera 98 No. 18-49, Cali, Valle del Cauca, 760032, Colombia
- Fundación Valle del Lili - Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Cali, Colombia
| | - Diego Peña
- Fundación Valle del Lili - Departamento de Cirugía - Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Carrera 98 No. 18-49, Cali, Valle del Cauca, 760032, Colombia.
| | | | - Mayra Estacio
- Fundación Valle del Lili - Departamento de Medicina Interna, Cali, Colombia
| | - Lidy Paola Vila
- Universidad Icesi - Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Cali, Colombia
| | - Maria Isabel Muñoz
- Universidad Icesi - Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Cali, Colombia
| | - Eduardo Cadavid-Alvear
- Fundación Valle del Lili - Departamento de Cirugía - Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Carrera 98 No. 18-49, Cali, Valle del Cauca, 760032, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Du J, Yang L, Hao Z, Li H, Yang C, Wang X, Zhang Z, Du Y, Zhang Y. Development and validation of a nomogram for major adverse cardiovascular events after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention for ischemic heart failure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2024. [PMID: 39033330 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) is an available means of revascularization in patients with ischemic heart failure (IHF). However, the prognosis of IHF patients undergoing CTO-PCI remains unclear due to the lack of reliable clinical predictive tools. AIM This study aimed to establish a nomogram for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after CTO-PCI in IHF patients. METHODS Sixty-seven potential predictive variables for MACE in 560 IHF patients undergoing CTO-PCI were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. A nomogram was constructed based on multivariable Cox regression to visualize the risk of MACE, and then evaluation was carried out using the concordance index (C-index), time-independent receiver operating characteristic (timeROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS During a median follow-up of 32.0 months, there were 208 MACE occurrences. Seven variables were selected for nomogram construction: age, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, N-terminal precursor B-type diuretic peptide, bending, and use of intravascular ultrasound and beta-blockers. The C-index was 0.715 (0.680-0.750) and the internal validation result was 0.715 (0.676-0.748). The timeROC area under the curve at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 0.750 (0.653-0.846), 0.747 (0.690-0.804), and 0.753 (0.708-0.798), respectively. The calibration curves and DCA showed the nomogram had acceptable calibration and clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS We developed a simple and efficient nomogram for MACE after CTO-PCI in IHF patients, which helps in early risk stratification and postoperative management optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqi Du
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lulu Yang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhengyang Hao
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huan Li
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chunlei Yang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xing Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhaozhi Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Youyou Du
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yanzhou Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krittanawong C, Rizwan A, Khawaja M, Newman N, Escobar J, Virk HUH, Alam M, Al-Azzam F, Yong CM, Jneid H. The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Curr Cardiol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11886-024-02090-x. [PMID: 38985226 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02090-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. RECENT FINDINGS Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Affan Rizwan
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Muzamil Khawaja
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Noah Newman
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Johao Escobar
- Division of Cardiology, Harlem Cardiology, NY, 10035, USA
| | - Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk
- Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | - Mahboob Alam
- Division of Cardiology, The Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Fu'ad Al-Azzam
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Celina M Yong
- VA Palo Alto Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford, University and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Palo AltoStanford, CACA, USA
| | - Hani Jneid
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farhan S, Freilich M, Giustino G, Vogel B, Baber U, Sartori S, Kamran H, Mehran R, Dangas G, Krishnan P, Kini A, Sharma SK. Change in left ventricular function and outcomes following high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella-guided hemodynamic support. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1416613. [PMID: 39036507 PMCID: PMC11258011 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1416613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI) are a potential treatment option for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary artery disease. The extent to which such intervention is coupled with improvement in LVEF and associated with favorable outcomes is unknown. Methods We aimed to characterize the incidence and correlates of LVEF improvement after Impella-guided HRPCI, and compare clinical outcomes in patients with versus without LVEF improvement. Data on consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from a single center registry were analyzed. LVEF-improvement was defined as an absolute increase of LVEF of ≥10% measured at ≥30-days after intervention. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization within 1-year. Results Out of 161 consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from June 2008 to December 2017, 43% (n = 70) demonstrated LVEF-improvement (baseline LVEF of 25.09 ± 6.19 to 33.30 ± 11.98 post intervention). Patients without LVEF-improvement had higher frequency of previous MI (61.5% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.0021), Q-waves on ECG (17.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.024) and higher SYNTAX scores (30.8 ± 17.6 vs. 25.2 ± 12.2; p = 0.043). After correction of these confounders by multivariable analysis, no significant differences were found regarding the composite endpoint in patients with versus without LVEF-improvement (34.9% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.48). Discussion In this single-center retrospective analysis, we report the following findings. First, LVEF improvement of at least 10% was documented in over 40% of patients undergoing Impella supported high-risk PCI. Second, a history of MI, Q-waves on admission ECG, and higher baseline SYNTAX scores were independent correlates of no LVEF improvement. Third, one year rates of adverse CV events were substantial and did not vary by the presence or absence of LVEF improvement Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to elucidate the impact of LVEF improvement on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Farhan
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Freilich
- Moses Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Gennaro Giustino
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Birgit Vogel
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Usman Baber
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Samantha Sartori
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haroon Kamran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - George Dangas
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Prakash Krishnan
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Annapoorna Kini
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Samin K. Sharma
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rao T, Tong H, Li J, Huang J, Yin Y, Zhang J. Exploring the role and mechanism of hyperoside against cardiomyocyte injury in mice with myocardial infarction based on JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. PHYTOMEDICINE : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOTHERAPY AND PHYTOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 128:155319. [PMID: 38518637 DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most deadly diseases in the world. Hyperoside (Hyp) has been shown to have a protective effect on cardiovascular function through various signaling pathways, but whether it can protect myocardial infarction by regulating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is unknown. AIM OF THE STUDY To investigate whether Hyp could protect the heart against myocardial infarction injury in mice by modulating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway and its potential mechanism. METHODS In vivo experiments, the myocardial infarction model was established by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) of male C57BL/6 mice permanently. The mice were divided into seven groups: sham group, MI group, MI+Hyp (9 mg/kg), MI+Hyp (18 mg/kg) group, MI+Hyp (36 mg/kg) group, MI+Captopril group (15 mg/kg) group and MI+Hyp (36 mg/kg)+AG490 (7.5 mg/kg) group. Each group of animals were given different concentrations of hyperoside, positive control drug or inhibitor of JAK2/STAT3 singaling. After 14 days of administration, the electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography and serum myocardial injury markers were examined; Slices of mouse myocardial tissue were assessed for histopathological changes by HE, Masson and Sirius Red staining. TTC and TUNEL staining were used to evaluate the myocardial infarction area and cardiomyocytes apoptosis respectively. The expression of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, apoptosis and autophagy-related proteins were detected by western blot. In vitro experiments, rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes were deprived of oxygen and glucose (OGD) to stimulate myocardial ischemia. The experiment was divided into seven groups: Control group, OGD group, OGD+Hyp (20 μM) group, OGD+Hyp (40 μM) group, OGD+Hyp (80 μM), OGD+Captopril (10 μM) group and OGD+Hyp (80 μM)+AG490 (100 μM) group. Myocardial cell damage and redox index were measured 12 h after OGD treatment. ROS content in cardiomyocytes was detected by immunofluorescence. Cardiomyocytes apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. The expressions of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway-related proteins, apoptosis and autophagy related proteins were detected by western blot. RESULTS In vivo, hyperoside could ameolirate ECG abnormality, increase cardiac function, reduce myocardial infarction size and significantly reduce myocardial fibrosis level and oxidation level. The experimental results in vitro showed that Hyp could reduce the ROS content in cardiomyocytes, decrease the level of oxidative stress and counteract the apoptosis induced by OGD injury . Both in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that hyperoside could increase phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT3, indicating that hyperoside could play a cardioprotective role by activating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. It was also shown that hyperoside could increase the autophagy level of cardiomyocytes in vivo and in vitro. However the cardiomyocyte-protective effect of Hyp was abolished in combination with JAK2/ STAT3 signaling pathway inhibitor AG490. These results indicated that the protective effect of Hyp on cardiomyocyte injury was at least partially achieved through the activation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. CONCLUSION Hyp can significantly improve cardiac function, ameliorate myocardial hypertrophy and myocardial remodeling in MI mice. The mechanism may be related to improving mitochondrial autophagy of cardiomyocytes to maintain the advantage of autophagy, and blocking apoptosis pathway through phagocytosis, thus suppressing apoptosis level of cardiomyocytes. These effects of Hyp are achieved, at least in part, by activating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingcai Rao
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China; Department of School of Pharmacy, Chongqing Health Vocational College, NO.99 Xirong Road, Dazu, 404100, PR China
| | - Hua Tong
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China; Department of Fuyang fifth People's Hospital, NO.227 Taihe Road, Yingquan District, Anhui Fuyang, 236000, PR China
| | - Jiahao Huang
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China
| | - Yanyan Yin
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China
| | - Junyan Zhang
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, No.81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmitt A, Behnes M, Rusnak J, Akin M, Reinhardt M, Abel N, Forner J, Müller J, Weidner K, Abumayyaleh M, Akin I, Schupp T. Characteristics Associated with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and Their Prognostic Impact in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2665. [PMID: 38731194 PMCID: PMC11084292 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias represents an established risk factor of mortality in heart failure (HF). However, data concerning their prognostic impact in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is limited. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate patient characteristics associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and their prognostic impact in patients with HFmrEF. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49% and signs and/or symptoms of HF) were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognosis of patients with HFmrEF and different types of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (i.e., non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT), sustained VT (sVT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was investigated for the primary endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 30 months. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality and long-term HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months. Results: From a total of 2184 patients with HFmrEF, 4.4% experienced ventricular tachyarrhythmias (i.e., 2.0% nsVT, 0.7% sVT, and 1.6% VF). The occurrence of nsVT was associated with higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, whereas the incidence of sVT/VF was associated with acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease. However, nsVT (25.0%; HR = 0.760; 95% CI 0.419-1.380; p = 0.367) and sVT/VF (28.8%; HR = 0.928; 95% CI 0.556-1.549; p = 0.776) were not associated with a higher risk of long-term all-cause mortality compared to patients with HFmrEF without ventricular tachyarrhythmias (31.5%). In-hospital cardiovascular mortality was more frequently observed in patients with HFmrEF and sVT/VF compared to those with HFmrEF but without sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (7.7% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.004). Finally, the risk of rehospitalization for worsening HF was not affected by the presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Conclusions: The occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients hospitalized with HFmrEF was low and not associated with long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schmitt
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Behnes
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jonas Rusnak
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69047 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Muharrem Akin
- Department of Cardiology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany
| | - Marielen Reinhardt
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Noah Abel
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan Forner
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julian Müller
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Kathrin Weidner
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mohammad Abumayyaleh
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tobias Schupp
- First Department of Medicine, Section for Invasive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang CW, Kohan S, Liu ILA, Lee JS, Baghdasaryan NC, Park JS, Vallejo JD, Subject CC, Nguyen H, Lee MS. Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Testing in Patients with New-Onset Heart Failure and Heart Failure Readmission and Mortality. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:747-755. [PMID: 38236317 PMCID: PMC11043252 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08599-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with new-onset heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD) testing remains underutilized. Whether widespread CAD testing in patients with new-onset HF leads to improved outcomes remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine whether CAD testing, and its timing, among patients hospitalized with new-onset HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is associated with improved outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Adult (≥ 18 years) non-pregnant patients with new-onset HFrEF hospitalized within one of 15 Kaiser Permanente Southern California medical centers between 2016 and 2021. Key exclusion criteria included history of heart transplant, hospice, and a do-not-resuscitate order. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcome was a composite of HF readmission or all-cause mortality through end of follow-up on 12/31/2022. KEY RESULTS Among 2729 patients hospitalized with new-onset HFrEF, 1487 (54.5%) received CAD testing. The median age was 66 (56-76) years old, 1722 (63.1%) were male, and 1074 (39.4%) were White. After a median of 1.8 (0.6-3.4) years, the testing group had a reduced risk of HF readmission or all-cause mortality (aHR [95%CI], 0.71 [0.63-0.79]). These results were consistent across subgroups by history of atrial fibrillation, diabetes, renal disease, myocardial infarction, and elevated troponin during hospitalization. In a secondary analysis where CAD testing was further divided to early (received testing before discharge) and late testing (up to 90 days after discharge), there was no difference in late vs early testing (0.97 [0.81-1.16]). CONCLUSIONS In a contemporary and diverse cohort of patients hospitalized with new-onset HFrEF, CAD testing within 90 days of hospitalization was associated with a lower risk of HF readmission or all-cause mortality. Testing within 90 days after discharge was not associated with worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Wei Huang
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
| | - Siamak Kohan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - In-Lu Amy Liu
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Janet S Lee
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Nicole C Baghdasaryan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joon S Park
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Jessica D Vallejo
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Christopher C Subject
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Huong Nguyen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Ming-Sum Lee
- Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
- Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mukherjee D. Is There a Role for Routine Stress Testing After Multivessel or Left Main PCI? J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:901-903. [PMID: 38418003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Debabrata Mukherjee
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu R, Song L, Zhang C, Jiang L, Tian J, Xu L, Feng X, Wan L, Zhao X, Xu O, Li C, Gao R, Hui R, Zhao W, Yuan J. Implications of left atrial volume index in patients with three-vessel coronary disease: A 6.6-year follow-up cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024; 137:441-449. [PMID: 37262047 PMCID: PMC10876251 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk assessment and treatment stratification for three-vessel coronary disease (TVD) remain challenging. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of left atrial volume index (LAVI) with the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score II, and its association with the long-term prognosis after three strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], and medical therapy [MT]) in patients with TVD. METHODS This study was a post hoc analysis of a large, prospective cohort of patients with TVD in China, that aimed to determine the long-term outcomes after PCI, CABG, or optimal MT alone. A total of 8943 patients with TVD were consecutively enrolled between 2004 and 2011 at Fuwai Hospital. A total of 7818 patients with available baseline LAVI data were included in the study. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Secondary endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, revascularization, and stroke. Long-term outcomes were evaluated among LAVI quartile groups. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 6.6 years, a higher LAVI was strongly associated with increased risk of MACCE (Q3: hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.37, P = 0.005; Q4: HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.64-2.09, P <0.001), all-cause death (Q3: HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.69, P <0.001; Q4: HR 2.54, 95%CI 2.16-3.00, P <0.001), and cardiac death (Q3: HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.39-2.37, P <0.001; Q4: HR 3.47, 95%CI 2.71-4.43, P <0.001). Moreover, LAVI significantly improved discrimination and reclassification of the SYNTAX score II. Notably, there was a significant interaction between LAVI quartiles and treatment strategies for MACCE. CABG was associated with lower risk of MACCE than MT alone, regardless of LAVI quartiles. Among patients in the fourth quartile, PCI was associated with significantly increased risk of cardiac death compared with CABG (HR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.97-14.03, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS LAVI is a potential index for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in patients with three-vessel coronary disease. CABG is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with MT alone, regardless of LAVI quartiles. When LAVI is severely elevated, PCI is associated with higher risk of cardiac death than CABG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
- Department of Respiratory and Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650102, China
| | - Lei Song
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Ce Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Lin Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Jian Tian
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Lianjun Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Xinxing Feng
- Department of Endocrinology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Linyuan Wan
- Department of Echocardiography, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Xueyan Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Ou Xu
- Department of Respiratory and Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan 650102, China
| | - Chongjian Li
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Runlin Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Rutai Hui
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- Information Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| | - Jinqing Yuan
- Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Del Portillo JH, Farjat-Pasos J, Galhardo A, Avvedimento M, Mas-Peiro S, Mengi S, Nuche J, Mohammadi S, Rodés-Cabau J. Aortic Stenosis With Coronary Artery Disease: SAVR or TAVR-When and How? Can J Cardiol 2024; 40:218-234. [PMID: 37758014 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increased the interest in the concomitant presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic stenosis (AS), prompting the need to define the appropriate revascularization strategy for each case. The reported prevalence of concurrent AS and CAD has varied over the years on the basis of the CAD definition and the population evaluated. Revascularization for treating CAD in patients with severe AS involves additional interventions that could impact outcomes. The addition of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has demonstrated favourable effects on long-term prognosis, while the impact of adding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to TAVR may depend on the CAD complexity and the feasibility of achieving complete or reasonably incomplete revascularization. Furthermore, the comparison between SAVR+CABG and TAVR+PCI in low-intermediate surgical risk and low-intermediate complex CAD patients did not reveal differences in all-cause mortality or stroke between the groups. However, there is some evidence showing a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events with the SAVR+CABG strategy for patients with complex CAD. Thus, SAVR+CABG seems to be the best option for patients with low-intermediate surgical risk and complex CAD, and TAVR+PCI for high surgical risk patients seeking complete and/or reasonable incomplete revascularization. After deciding between TAVR+PCI or SAVR+CABG, factors such as timing for PCI, low ejection fraction, coronary reaccess, and valve durability must be considered. Finally, alternative methods for assessing CAD severity are currently under evaluation to ascertain their real value for guiding revascularization in patients with severe AS with CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julio Farjat-Pasos
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Attilio Galhardo
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marisa Avvedimento
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Silvia Mas-Peiro
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Siddhartha Mengi
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jorge Nuche
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matta A, Ohlmann P, Nader V, Levai L, Kang R, Carrié D, Roncalli J. A review of the conservative versus invasive management of ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Curr Probl Cardiol 2024; 49:102347. [PMID: 38103822 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Heart failure is increasing in terms of prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates. Clinical trials and studies are focusing on heart failure as it is the destiny end-stage for several cardiovascular disorders. Recently, medical therapy has dramatically progressed with novel classes of medicines providing better quality of life and survival outcomes. However, heart failure remains a heavy impactful factor on societies and populations. Current guidelines from the American and European cardiac societies are not uniform with respect to the class and level of treatment recommendations for coronary artery disease patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The discrepancy among international recommendations, stemming from the lack of evidence from adequately powered randomized trials, challenges physicians in choosing the optimal strategy. Hybrid therapy including optimal medical therapy with revascularization strategies are commonly used for the management of ischemic heart failure. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has proved its efficacy on improving long term outcome and prognosis while no large randomized clinical trials for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are still available. Regardless of the lack of data and recommendations, the trends of performing PCI in ischemic heart failure prevailed over CABG whereas lesion complexity, chronic total occlusion and complete revascularization achievement are limiting factors. Lastly, regenerative medicine seems a promising approach for advanced heart failure enhancing cardiomyocytes proliferation, reverse remodeling, scar size reduction and cardiac function restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Matta
- Department of Cardiology, Civilian Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France.
| | - Patrick Ohlmann
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vanessa Nader
- Department of Cardiology, Civilian Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Laszlo Levai
- Department of Cardiology, Civilian Hospital of Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - Ryeonshi Kang
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Didier Carrié
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jerome Roncalli
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lu SR, Zhu Y, Zhou W, Zhang J, Deng YB, Liu YN. Incremental prognostic utility of left ventricular and left atrial strains in coronary artery disease patients with reduced systolic function. Echocardiography 2024; 41:e15740. [PMID: 38284688 DOI: 10.1111/echo.15740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) on adverse events in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with reduced systolic function. METHODS A total of 192 consecutive patients clinically diagnosed with chronic CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% were finally included. Multiple strain parameters were analyzed with speckle tracking echocardiography. The composite endpoint included all-cause mortality, rehospitalization due to heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. RESULTS Patients experiencing the endpoint showed lower LVEF, lower absolute GLS and LARS than those without events. Both GLS (AUC = 0.82 [GLS] vs. 0.58 [LVEF], p < 0.001) and LARS (AUC = 0.71 [LARS] vs. 0.58 [LVEF], p = 0.033) were superior to LVEF in predicting adverse events. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that both GLS (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.79; p < 0.001) and LARS (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for the endpoint. The addition of LARS (global chi-squared, 35.7 vs. 17.4; p < 0.05), GLS (global chi-squared, 58.6 vs. 17.4; p < 0.05) or both LARS and GLS (global chi-squared, 79.6 vs. 17.4; p < 0.05) to LVEF in the prediction model significantly improved its performance. The same significant improvement was also shown in the subgroups of mild (30% < LVEF ≤ 50%) and severe (LVEF ≤ 30%) reduced systolic function. CONCLUSIONS Regarding CAD patients with reduced LVEF, both GLS and LARS are superior to LVEF in predicting adverse events, providing significant incremental value to LVEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Rui Lu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ying Zhu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - You-Bin Deng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ya-Ni Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maigrot JLA, Weiss AJ, Tong MZY, Bakaeen F, Soltesz EG. Programmatic approach to patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy: Integrating microaxial support into strategies for the modern era. Artif Organs 2024; 48:6-15. [PMID: 38013239 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy manifesting as left ventricular dysfunction exist along a spectrum of severity and risk, and thus decision-making surrounding optimal management is challenging. Treatment pathways can include medical therapy as well as revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Additionally, temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support, as well as heart transplantation, may be optimal for select patients. Given this spectrum of risk and the complexity of treatment pathways, patients may not receive appropriate therapy given their perceived risk, which can lead to sub-satisfactory outcomes. In this review, we discuss the identification of high-risk ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, along with our programmatic approach to patient evaluation and perioperative optimization. We also discuss our strategies for therapeutic decision-making designed to optimize both short- and long-term patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Luc A Maigrot
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron J Weiss
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Z Y Tong
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Faisal Bakaeen
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Edward G Soltesz
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure and Recovery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Masuda S, Serruys PW, Ninomiya K, Kageyama S, Nozomi K, Gao C, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Morice MC, Thuijs DJFM, Milojevic M, Davierwala PM, Garg S, Onuma Y. Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on 10-year mortality in the SYNTAX trial. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024; 58:7-15. [PMID: 37414612 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS The impact of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on very long-term prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has been debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVEF at baseline on 10-year mortality in the SYNTAX trial. METHODS Patients (n = 1800) were categorized into three sub-groups: reduced (rEF ≤ 40 %), mildly reduced (mrEF 41-49 %), and preserved LVEF (pEF ≥ 50 %). The SYNTAX score 2020 (SS-2020) was applied in patients with LVEF<50 % and ≥ 50 %. RESULTS Ten-year mortalities were 44.0 %, 31.8 %, and 22.6 % (P < 0.001) in patients with rEF (n = 168), mrEF (n = 179), and pEF (n = 1453). Although no significant differences were observed, the mortality with PCI was higher than with CABG in patients with rEF (52.9 % vs 39.6 %, P = 0.054) and mrEF (36.0 % vs. 28.6 %, P = 0.273), and comparable in pEF (23.9 % vs. 22.2 %, P = 0.275). Calibration and discrimination of the SS-2020 in patients with LVEF<50 % were poor, whilst they were reasonable in those with LVEF≥50 %. The proportion of patients eligible for PCI who had a predicted equipoise in mortality with CABG was estimated to be 57.5 % in patients with LVEF≥50 %. CABG was safer than PCI in 62.2 % of patients with LVEF<50 %. CONCLUSIONS Reduced LVEF was associated with an increased risk of 10-year mortality in patients revascularized either surgically or percutaneously. Compared to PCI, CABG was safe revascularization in patients with LVEF≤40 %. In patients with LVEF≥50 % individualized 10-year all-cause mortality predicted by SS-2020 was helpful in decision-making whilst the predictivity in patients with LVEF<50 % was poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- Department of Cardiology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; NHLI, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Kai Ninomiya
- Department of Cardiology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Kotoku Nozomi
- Department of Cardiology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Chao Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, China; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael J Mack
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David R Holmes
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Marie-Claude Morice
- Département of Cardiologie, Hôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Générale de Santé Massy, France
| | - Daniel J F M Thuijs
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Milan Milojevic
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Piroze M Davierwala
- University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scot Garg
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Yoshinobu Onuma
- Department of Cardiology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thuan PQ, Chuong PTV, Nam NH, Dinh NH. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Evidence-Based Practice. Cardiol Rev 2023:00045415-990000000-00183. [PMID: 38112423 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains a pivotal cornerstone, offering established symptomatic alleviation and prognostic advantages for patients grappling with complex multivessel and left main coronary artery diseases. Despite the lucid guidance laid out by contemporary guidelines regarding the choice between CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a notable hesitation persists among certain patients, characterized by psychological reservations, knowledge gaps, or individual beliefs that sway their inclination toward surgical intervention. This comprehensive review critically synthesizes the prevailing guidelines, modern practices, and outcomes pertaining to CABG surgery, delving into an array of techniques and advancements poised to enhance both short-term and enduring surgical outcomes. The exploration encompasses advances in on-pump and off-pump procedures, conduit selection strategies encompassing the bilateral utilization of internal mammary artery and radial artery conduits, meticulous graft evaluation methodologies, and the panorama of minimally invasive approaches, including those assisted by robotic technology. Furthermore, the review navigates the terrain of hybrid coronary revascularization, shedding light on the pivotal roles of shared decision-making and the heart team in shaping treatment pathways. As a comprehensive compendium, this review not only navigates the intricate landscape of CABG surgery but also aligns it with contemporary practices, envisioning its trajectory within the evolving currents of healthcare dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phan Quang Thuan
- From the Department of Adult Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Pham Tran Viet Chuong
- From the Department of Adult Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Hoai Nam
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Hoang Dinh
- From the Department of Adult Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Golukhova EZ, Slivneva IV, Kozlova OS, Berdibekov BS, Skopin II, Merzlyakov VY, Baichurin RK, Sigaev IY, Keren MA, Alshibaya MD, Marapov DI, Arzumanyan MA. Treatment Strategies for Chronic Coronary Heart Disease with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction or Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY 2023; 30:640-658. [PMID: 38133147 PMCID: PMC10747738 DOI: 10.3390/pathophysiology30040046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In this meta-analysis, we examine the advantages of invasive strategies for patients diagnosed with chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) and preserved left ventricular (LV) function, as well as those with significant LV systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction (EF) < 45%). MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a systematic search to identify all randomized trials directly comparing invasive strategies with optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients diagnosed with chronic CHD. Data from these trials were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome assessed was the all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints included cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization. This study was designed to assess the benefits of both invasive strategies and OMT in patients with preserved LV function and in those with LV systolic dysfunction. The statistical analysis of the data was conducted using the Review Manager (RevMan) software, version 5.4.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). RESULTS Twelve randomized studies enrolling 13,912 patients were included in the final analysis. Among the patients with chronic CHD and preserved LV systolic function, revascularization did not demonstrate a reduction in all-cause mortality (8.52% vs. 8.45%, p = 0.45), CV death (3.41% vs. 3.62%, p = 0.08), or the incidence of MI (9.88% vs. 10.49%, p = 0.47). However, the need for unplanned myocardial revascularization was significantly lower in the group following the initial invasive approach compared to patients undergoing OMT (14.75% vs. 25.72%, p < 0.001). In contrast, the invasive strategy emerged as the preferred treatment modality for patients with ischemic LV systolic dysfunction. This approach demonstrated lower rates of all-cause mortality (40.61% vs. 46.52%, p = 0.004), CV death (28.75% vs. 35.82%, p = 0.0004), and MI (8.19% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In individuals diagnosed with chronic CHD and preserved LV EF, the initial invasive approach did not demonstrate a clinical advantage over OMT. Conversely, in patients with ischemic LV systolic dysfunction, myocardial revascularization was found to reduce the risks of CV events and enhance the overall outcomes. These findings hold significant clinical relevance for optimizing treatment strategies in patients with chronic CHD, contingent upon myocardial contractility status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inessa Viktorovna Slivneva
- Department of Cardiovascular and Comorbid Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.K.); (R.K.B.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Olga Sergeevna Kozlova
- Department of Cardiovascular and Comorbid Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.K.); (R.K.B.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Bektur Shukurbekovich Berdibekov
- Department of Non-Invasive Arrhythmology and Surgical Treatment of Combined Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Ivan Ivanovich Skopin
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery of Heart Valves and Coronary Arteries, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Vadim Yuryevich Merzlyakov
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease and Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Renat Kamilyevich Baichurin
- Department of Cardiovascular and Comorbid Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.K.); (R.K.B.); (M.A.A.)
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease and Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Igor Yuryevich Sigaev
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Coronary and Great Arteries Combined Diseases, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (I.Y.S.); (M.A.K.)
| | - Milena Abrekovna Keren
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Coronary and Great Arteries Combined Diseases, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (I.Y.S.); (M.A.K.)
| | - Mikhail Durmishkhanovich Alshibaya
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Damir Ildarovich Marapov
- Department of Public Health, Economics and Health Care Management, Kazan State Medical Academy—Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, 420012 Kazan, Russia;
| | - Milena Artemovna Arzumanyan
- Department of Cardiovascular and Comorbid Pathology, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia; (O.S.K.); (R.K.B.); (M.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kabulski GM, Boughner T, Szymanski TW, Sokos GG, Kido K. Evaluating Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Post-coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. J Pharm Pract 2023; 36:1370-1374. [PMID: 35926866 DOI: 10.1177/08971900221118172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence regarding the use of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is available. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize prescription of HFrEF GDMT use before and after CABG. Methods: A retrospective analysis of adult patients with an ejection fraction ≤40% undergoing CABG was performed. The primary objective was to evaluate patients receiving HFrEF GDMT, defined as a heart failure beta-blocker (HFBB) and a renin-angiotensin inhibitor preoperatively and postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dosing, percent of patients on each individual therapy, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use, and the combination thereof. The follow up period was 1 year. Results: Thirty-eight patients met criteria for inclusion. Prior to CABG, 52.6% of patients were receiving HFrEF GDMT. The prescribing rate of HFrEF GDMT was not significantly higher at any point within 1 year postoperatively (P = .299). The rate of renin-angiotensin inhibitors, HFBB, and aldosterone antagonists use significantly increased from 13.2% preoperatively to 36.8% at 1 year after CABG (P = .022). Doses of individual therapies were not significantly different across all time points preoperatively and postoperatively. Conclusion: HFrEF GDMT use and doses of individual therapies after CABG were not maximized. Collaborative efforts between cardiac surgeons, heart failure cardiologists, and pharmacists could be used to optimize HFrEF GDMT use and dose titration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen M Kabulski
- Department of Pharmacy Services, J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Troy Boughner
- West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Thomas W Szymanski
- Department of Pharmacy Services, J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - George G Sokos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Kazuhiko Kido
- West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, Bittner V, Brewer LC, Demeter SH, Dixon DL, Fearon WF, Hess B, Johnson HM, Kazi DS, Kolte D, Kumbhani DJ, LoFaso J, Mahtta D, Mark DB, Minissian M, Navar AM, Patel AR, Piano MR, Rodriguez F, Talbot AW, Taqueti VR, Thomas RJ, van Diepen S, Wiggins B, Williams MS. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2023; 148:e9-e119. [PMID: 37471501 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 182.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dave L Dixon
- Former Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guideline member; current member during the writing effort
| | - William F Fearon
- Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions representative
| | | | | | | | - Dhaval Kolte
- AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Data Standards
| | | | | | | | - Daniel B Mark
- Former Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guideline member; current member during the writing effort
| | | | | | | | - Mariann R Piano
- Former Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guideline member; current member during the writing effort
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, Bittner V, Brewer LC, Demeter SH, Dixon DL, Fearon WF, Hess B, Johnson HM, Kazi DS, Kolte D, Kumbhani DJ, LoFaso J, Mahtta D, Mark DB, Minissian M, Navar AM, Patel AR, Piano MR, Rodriguez F, Talbot AW, Taqueti VR, Thomas RJ, van Diepen S, Wiggins B, Williams MS. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:833-955. [PMID: 37480922 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.
Collapse
|
22
|
Li Kam Wa ME, Assar SZ, Kirtane AJ, Perera D. Revascularisation for Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy. Interv Cardiol 2023; 18:e24. [PMID: 37655258 PMCID: PMC10466461 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2023.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Coronary artery bypass grafting appears to provide clinical benefits such as improvements in quality of life, reductions in readmissions and MI, and favourable effects on long-term mortality; however, there is a significant short-term procedural risk when left ventricular function is severely impaired, which poses a conundrum for many patients. Could percutaneous coronary intervention provide the same benefits without the hazard of surgery? There have been no randomised studies to support this practice until recently. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial (NCT01920048) assessed the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and stable coronary artery disease. This review examines the trial results in detail, suggests a pathway for investigation and revascularisation in ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and explores some of the remaining unanswered questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E Li Kam Wa
- Coronary Research Group, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, King's College London London, UK
| | - Saba Z Assar
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, NY, US
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York, NY, US
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY, US
| | - Divaka Perera
- Coronary Research Group, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, King's College London London, UK
- Cardiovascular Division, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fremes SE, Marquis-Gravel G, Gaudino MFL, Jolicoeur EM, Bédard S, Masterson Creber R, Ruel M, Vervoort D, Wijeysundera HC, Farkouh ME, Rouleau JL. STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:e012527. [PMID: 37582169 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here. METHODS The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from ≈45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG. RESULTS The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. CONCLUSIONS STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease. REGISTRATION URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05427370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E Fremes
- Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.E.F., D.V., H.C.W.)
| | | | - Mario F L Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (M.F.L.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY
| | - E Marc Jolicoeur
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (M.F.L.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY
| | - Sylvain Bédard
- Centre d'excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (S.B.)
| | | | - Marc Ruel
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (M.R.)
| | - Dominique Vervoort
- Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.E.F., D.V., H.C.W.)
| | - Harindra C Wijeysundera
- Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.E.F., D.V., H.C.W.)
| | - Michael E Farkouh
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada (M.E.F.)
| | - Jean-Lucien Rouleau
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.M.-G., E.M.J., J.-L.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Popova NV, Popov VA, Revishvili AS. [Myocardial revascularization in chronic coronary artery disease. State of art]. KARDIOLOGIIA 2023; 63:3-13. [PMID: 37470728 DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2023.6.n2263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
The review addresses debatable issues of myocardial revascularization in chronic forms of ischemic heart disease, shows major differences between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in terms of long-term prognosis, and the dependence of the results on the clinical profile of the disease. The review of current publications demonstrates advantages of open surgery in long-term survival and prevention of adverse outcomes in target groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N V Popova
- Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow
| | - V A Popov
- Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow
| | - A S Revishvili
- Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Moscow
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Park H, Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yang DH, Koo HJ, Kang JW, Lee PH, Lee SE, Kim MS, Kang SJ, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Kim HJ, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Myocardial Scar and Revascularization on Mortality in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (from the Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study). Am J Cardiol 2023; 192:212-220. [PMID: 36848690 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
Myocardial viability test to guide revascularization remains uncertain in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. We evaluated the different impacts of revascularization on cardiac mortality according to the extent of myocardial scar assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. A total of 404 consecutive patients with significant coronary artery disease and an ejection fraction ≤35% were assessed by LGE-CMR before revascularization. Of them, 306 patients underwent revascularization and 98 patients received medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was cardiac death. During a median follow-up of 6.3 years, cardiac death occurred in 158 patients (39.1%). Revascularization was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac death than medical treatment alone in the overall population (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.45, p <0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of segments with >75% transmural LGE and revascularization on the risk of cardiac death (p = 0.037 for interaction). In patients with limited myocardial scar (<6 segments with >75% transmural LGE, n = 354), revascularization had a significantly lower risk of cardiac death than medical treatment alone (aHR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.37, p <0.001); in patients with extensive myocardial scar (≥6 segments with >75% transmural LGE, n = 50), there was no significant difference between revascularization and medical treatment alone regarding the risk of cardiac death (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.80, p = 0.60). In conclusion, the assessment of myocardial scar by LGE-CMR may be helpful in the decision-making process for revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanbit Park
- Department of Cardiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Do-Yoon Kang
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Min Ahn
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Dong Hyun Yang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Cardiac Imaging Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hyun Jung Koo
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Cardiac Imaging Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon-Won Kang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Cardiac Imaging Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil Hyung Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Eun Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Seok Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Jin Kang
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Duk-Woo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Whan Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Hak Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Whan Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Jin Kim
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Bum Kim
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Ho Jung
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Jung Choo
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol-Hyun Chung
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Won Lee
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Joong Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Wook Park
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vassiliki’ Cousoumbas G, Casella G, Di Pasquale G. What is the role of coronary revascularization to recover the contractility of the dysfunctional heart? Eur Heart J Suppl 2023; 25:B75-B78. [PMID: 37091666 PMCID: PMC10120954 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is the predominant aetiology of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in industrialized countries. The pathophysiological substrate of hibernating myocardium constitutes the conceptual target of coronary revascularization by coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or coronary angioplasty or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Studies, mainly observational, conducted in the past have demonstrated a prognostic benefit of CABG on survival. These findings were confirmed by the long-term follow-up of the STICH study in which, however, documentation of inducible ischaemia or myocardial viability was not predictive of a prognostic benefit of CABG. Revascularization via PCI in the recent REVIVED-BCIS2 study did not demonstrate a significant benefit in terms of death or heart failure hospitalization compared with optimal medical therapy. Pending the long-term follow-up of the REVIVED-BCIS2 study, optimized medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, where indicated, are the mainstay of treatment in patients with dilated ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The decision for coronary revascularization is made in the individual patient, possibly with a higher bias in patients with angina, three-vessel coronary artery disease, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and cardiac remodelling.
Collapse
|
27
|
Becher PM, Seiffert M. [Interventional treatment of heart failure : Stents and valves]. Herz 2023; 48:101-108. [PMID: 36700948 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-022-05160-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The pharmacotherapy of heart failure has evolved in recent years and with the aid of new classes of drugs symptomatic and prognostic improvements can be achieved in patients with heart failure. Heart failure is particularly frequently associated with coronary artery disease or higher grade, often functional valve defects. In the context of the underlying disease, the operative risk is often increased, so that interventional treatment is preferred over surgical treatment options in interdisciplinary heart teams. Promising approaches with very different challenges are emerging for interventional myocardial revascularization and percutaneous correction of high-grade aortic valve stenosis or functional mitral or tricuspid valve regurgitation. It has consistently been shown that an elaborate diagnostic work-up and differentiated patient selection are decisive to achieve a prognostic or symptomatic benefit in these patients using interventional treatment. While awaiting further study data on this topic, the integration of a multidisciplinary heart team is essential to ensure a complementary and balanced therapeutic approach for patient-centered care in this complex patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Moritz Becher
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. .,Standort Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - Moritz Seiffert
- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Standort Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park S, Park SJ, Park DW. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Korean Circ J 2023; 53:113-133. [PMID: 36914602 PMCID: PMC10011221 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Owing to a large-jeopardized myocardium, left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) represents the substantial high-risk anatomical subset of obstructive coronary artery disease. For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the "gold standard" treatment for LMCAD. Along with advances in CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has also dramatically evolved over time in conjunction with advances in the stent or device technology, adjunct pharmacotherapy, accumulated experiences, and practice changes, establishing its position as a safe, reasonable treatment option for such a complex disease. Until recently, several randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational registries comparing PCI and CABG for LMCAD have shown comparable long-term survival with tradeoffs between early and late risk-benefit of each treatment. Despite this, there are still several unmet issues for revascularization strategy and management for LMCAD. This review article summarized updated knowledge on evolution and clinical evidence on the treatment of LMCAD, with a focus on the comparison of state-of-the-art PCI with CABG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangwoo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Duk-Woo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sun T, Huang X, Zhang B, Ma M, Chen Z, Zhao Z, Zhou Y. Prognostic significance of the triglyceride-glucose index for patients with ischemic heart failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1100399. [PMID: 36814584 PMCID: PMC9939475 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1100399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In previous studies, the TyG index (triglyceride-glucose index) has been proven to be closely associated with the prognosis of cardiovascular disease. However, the impact of TyG index on the prognosis of patients with ischemic HF (heart failure) undergoing PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) is still unclear. METHOD In this study, 2055 patients with ischemic HF were retrospectively enrolled and classified into four groups based on quartiles of the TyG index. The primary endpoint was MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events) consisting of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI (myocardial infarction), and any revascularization. The incidence of the endpoints among the four groups was assessed through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The independent correlation between TyG index and endpoints was analyzed with multivariate Cox regression models. Besides, the RCS (restricted cubic spline) analysis was performed to examine the nonlinear relationship between TyG index and MACE. RESULT The incidence of MACE was significantly higher in participants with a higher TyG index. The positive association between the TyG index and MACE was also confirmed in the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Multivariate cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that the TyG index was independently associated with the increased risk of MACE, regardless of whether TyG was a continuous [TyG, per 1-unit increase, HR (hazard ratio) 1.41, 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.22-1.62, P < 0.001] or categorical variable [quartile of TyG, the HR (95% CI) values for quartile 4 was 1.92 (1.48-2.49), with quartile 1 as a reference]. In addition, the nonlinear association of TyG index with MACE was shown through RCS model and the risk of MACE increased as the TyG index increased in general (Nonlinear p=0.0215). Besides, no obvious interaction was found in the association of TyG with MACE between the DM (diabetes mellitus) group and the no-DM group. CONCLUSION Among patients with ischemic HF undergoing PCI, the TyG index was correlated with MACE independently and positively.
Collapse
|
30
|
Daoulah A, Naser MJ, Hersi AS, Alshehri M, Garni TA, Abuelatta R, Yousif N, Almahmeed W, Alasmari A, Aljohar A, Alzahrani B, Abumelha BK, Ghani MA, Amin H, Hashmani S, Hiremath N, Kazim HM, Refaat W, Selim E, Jamjoom A, El-Sayed O, Al-Faifi SM, Feteih MN, Dahdouh Z, Aithal J, Ibrahim AM, Elganady A, Qutub MA, Alama MN, Abohasan A, Hassan T, Balghith M, Hussien AF, Abdulhabeeb IAM, Ahmad O, Ramadan M, Alqahtani AH, Alshahrani SS, Qenawi W, Shawky A, Ghonim AA, Elmahrouk A, Alhamid S, Maghrabi M, Haddara MM, Iskandar M, Shawky AM, Hurley WT, Elmahrouk Y, Ahmed WA, Lotfi A. Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes after left main revascularization: g-LM Registry. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2023; 24:23-35. [PMID: 36219153 DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000001383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The impact of left ventricular dysfunction on clinical outcomes following revascularization is not well established in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes of patients with ULMCA requiring revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHODS The details of the design, methods, end points, and relevant definitions are outlined in the Gulf Left Main Registry: a retrospective, observational study conducted between January 2015 and December 2019 across 14 centres in 3 Gulf countries. In this study, the data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through PCI or CABG were stratified by LVEF into three main subgroups; low (l-LVEF <40%), mid-range (m-LVEF 40-49%), and preserved (p-LVEF ≥50%). Primary outcomes were hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality and follow-up MACCE and mortality. RESULTS A total of 2137 patients were included; 1221 underwent PCI and 916 had CABG. During hospitalization, MACCE was significantly higher in patients with l-LVEF [(10.10%), P = 0.005] and m-LVEF [(10.80%), P = 0.009], whereas total mortality was higher in patients with m-LVEF [(7.40%), P = 0.009] and p-LVEF [(7.10%), P = 0.045] who underwent CABG. There was no mortality difference between groups in patients with l-LVEF. At a median follow-up of 15 months, there was no difference in MACCE and total mortality between patients who underwent CABG or PCI with p-LVEF and m-LVEF. CONCLUSION CABG was associated with higher in-hospital events. Hospital mortality in patients with l-LVEF was comparable between CABG and PCI. At 15 months' follow-up, PCI could have an advantage in decreasing MACCE in patients with l-LVEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Daoulah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Maryam Jameel Naser
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ahmad S Hersi
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University, Riyadh
| | - Mohammed Alshehri
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait
| | - Turki Al Garni
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh
| | - Reda Abuelatta
- Department of Cardiology, Madinah Cardiac Center, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Nooraldaem Yousif
- Department of Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Center, Awali, Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Wael Almahmeed
- Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Abdulaziz Alasmari
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Alwaleed Aljohar
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University, Riyadh
| | - Badr Alzahrani
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh
| | - Bader K Abumelha
- Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh
| | - Mohamed Ajaz Ghani
- Department of Cardiology, Madinah Cardiac Center, Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Haitham Amin
- Department of Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Center, Awali, Kingdom of Bahrain
| | | | | | | | - Wael Refaat
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Al Hassa
| | - Ehab Selim
- Department of Cardiology, Alhada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif
| | - Ahmed Jamjoom
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama El-Sayed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Salem M Al-Faifi
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
| | - Maun N Feteih
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
| | - Ziad Dahdouh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Jairam Aithal
- Department of Cardiology, Yas Clinic, Khalifa City A, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | | - Mohammed A Qutub
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah
| | - Mohamed N Alama
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah
| | | | - Taher Hassan
- Department of Cardiology, Bugshan General Hospital, Jeddah
| | - Mohammed Balghith
- King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh
| | | | | | - Osama Ahmad
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Ramadan
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Al Hassa
| | | | - Saif S Alshahrani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Wael Qenawi
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait
| | - Ahmed Shawky
- Department of Cardiology, Prince Khaled Bin Sultan Cardiac Center, Khamis Mushait
| | - Ahmed A Ghonim
- Cardiology Center of Excellence, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah
| | - Ahmed Elmahrouk
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Sameer Alhamid
- Department of Emergency Medicine, King Fahad Medical City
| | | | - Mamdouh M Haddara
- Department of Anesthesia, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mina Iskandar
- Department of Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Abeer M Shawky
- Department of Cardiology, Dr Erfan and Bagedo General Hospital
| | - William T Hurley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Waleed A Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Security Forces Hospital, Mecca, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Amir Lotfi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jalava MP, Savontaus M, Ahvenvaara T, Laakso T, Virtanen M, Niemelä M, Tauriainen T, Maaranen P, Husso A, Kinnunen E, Dahlbacka S, Jaakkola J, Rosato S, D’Errigo P, Laine M, Mäkikallio T, Raivio P, Eskola M, Valtola A, Juvonen T, Biancari F, Airaksinen J, Anttila V. Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 17:322. [PMID: 36529781 PMCID: PMC9759878 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-02061-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction have a poor prognosis, and this may result in inferior survival also after aortic valve replacement. The outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement were investigated in this comparative analysis. METHODS The retrospective nationwide FinnValve registry included data on patients who underwent transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis for severe aortic stenosis. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the outcomes for baseline covariates of patients with reduced (≤ 50%) left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS Within the unselected, consecutive 6463 patients included in the registry, the prevalence of reduced ejection fraction was 20.8% (876 patients) in the surgical cohort and 27.7% (452 patients) in the transcatheter cohort. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with decreased survival (adjusted hazards ratio 1.215, 95%CI 1.067-1.385) after a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Among 255 propensity score matched pairs, 30-day mortality was 3.1% after transcatheter and 7.8% after surgical intervention (p = 0.038). One-year and 4-year survival were 87.5% and 65.9% after transcatheter intervention and 83.9% and 69.6% after surgical intervention (restricted mean survival time ratio, 1.002, 95%CI 0.929-1.080, p = 0.964), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with increased morbidity and mortality after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Thirty-day mortality was higher after surgery, but intermediate-term survival was comparable to transcatheter intervention. Trial registration The FinnValve registry ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03385915.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maina P. Jalava
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, P. O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Mikko Savontaus
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, P. O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Tuomas Ahvenvaara
- grid.412326.00000 0004 4685 4917Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Teemu Laakso
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marko Virtanen
- grid.502801.e0000 0001 2314 6254Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Matti Niemelä
- grid.412326.00000 0004 4685 4917Department of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuomas Tauriainen
- grid.412326.00000 0004 4685 4917Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pasi Maaranen
- grid.502801.e0000 0001 2314 6254Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Annastiina Husso
- grid.410705.70000 0004 0628 207XHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eve Kinnunen
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sebastian Dahlbacka
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Jaakkola
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, P. O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Stefano Rosato
- grid.416651.10000 0000 9120 6856National Centre of Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola D’Errigo
- grid.416651.10000 0000 9120 6856National Centre of Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Mika Laine
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Mäkikallio
- grid.412326.00000 0004 4685 4917Department of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Peter Raivio
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku Eskola
- grid.502801.e0000 0001 2314 6254Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Valtola
- grid.410705.70000 0004 0628 207XHeart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tatu Juvonen
- grid.412326.00000 0004 4685 4917Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ,grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Heart Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fausto Biancari
- Clinica Montevergine, GVM Care and Research, Mercogliano, Italy
| | - Juhani Airaksinen
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, P. O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Vesa Anttila
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XHeart Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, P. O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mori M, Mark DB, Khera R, Lin H, Jones P, Huang C, Lu Y, Geirsson A, Velazquez EJ, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM. Identifying quality of life outcome patterns to inform treatment choices in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 2022; 254:12-22. [PMID: 35932911 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial found that routine use of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) improved mean quality of life (QoL) scores relative to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, mean differences in QoL scores do not provide what patients want to know when facing a high-risk/high-benefit treatment choice. METHODS We analyzed Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary scores in CABG and GDMT patients over 36 months using a combination of statistical methods to group QoL data into clinically relevant outcome patterns (phenotype trajectories) and to then identify the main baseline predictors of each phenotype. QoL outcome phenotypes were developed using mixture models to define the dominant phenotype trajectories present in STICH QoL data. Logistic regression models were used to predict each patient's probability of achieving each outcome pattern with each treatment. RESULTS In STICH, 592 patients underwent CABG and 607 were managed with GDMT. Our analyses identified 3 phenotype trajectory patterns in both treatment groups. Two of the 3 trajectories showed improving patterns, and were classified as "good QoL trajectories," seen in 498 (84.1%) CABG and 449 (73.9%) GDMT patients. Defining a consequential CABG-GDMT treatment difference as a >10% higher absolute predicted probability of belonging to good QoL trajectories, 277 (23.5%) patients were more likely to have good outcome with CABG while 45 (3.8%) patients were more likely to have a good outcome with GDMT. For 644 (54.7%) patients, CABG and GDMT probabilities of a good outcome were within 5% of each other. CONCLUSIONS The pattern of QoL outcomes after CABG compared with GDMT in STICH followed 3 main phenotypic trajectories, which could be predicted based on individual baseline features. Patient-specific predictions about expected QoL outcomes with different treatment choices provide an intuitive framework for personalizing patient decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Mori
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, YaleNew Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Daniel B Mark
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Rohan Khera
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, YaleNew Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Haiqun Lin
- Division of Nursing Science, School of Nursing & Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ
| | - Philip Jones
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO
| | - Chenxi Huang
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, YaleNew Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Yuan Lu
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, YaleNew Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Eric J Velazquez
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - John A Spertus
- Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, YaleNew Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Weiting H, Yaoxian AZ, Keong YK, Lam SW, How LY, Sahlén AO, Pourghaderi A, Che M, Terrance CSJ, Graves N. The clinical value and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with coronary artery disease. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2022; 12:56. [PMID: 36348165 PMCID: PMC9644580 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00401-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical value and cost-effectiveness of invasive treatments for patients with coronary artery disease is unclear. Invasive treatments such as coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention are frequently used as a starting treatment, yet they are much more costly than optimal medical therapy. While patients may transition into other treatments over time, the choices of starting treatments are likely important determinants of costs and health outcomes. The aim is to predict by how much costs and health outcomes will change from a decision to use different starting treatments for patients with coronary artery disease in an Asian setting. METHODS A cost-effectiveness study using a Markov model informed by data from Singapore General Hospital was done. All patients with initial presentations of stable coronary disease and no acute coronary syndromes who received medical treatments and interventional therapies were included. We compare existing practice, where the starting treatment can be medical therapy or stent percutaneous coronary interventions or coronary artery bypass grafting, with alternate starting treatment strategies. RESULTS When compared to 'existing practice' a policy of starting 14% of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting and 86% with optimal medical therapy showed savings of $1,743 per patient and 0.23 additional quality adjusted life years. A change to policy nationwide would save $10 million and generate 1,380 quality adjusted life years. CONCLUSIONS Increasing coronary artery bypass grafting and use of medical therapy in the setting of coronary artery disease is likely to saves costs and improve health outcomes. A definitive study to address the question we investigate would be very difficult to undertake and so using existing data to model the expected outcomes is a useful tool. There are likely to be large and complex barriers to the implementation of any policy change based on the findings of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shao Wei Lam
- Duke NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, 169857 Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lau Yee How
- Health Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Matthew Che
- Health Services Research Centre, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Nicholas Graves
- Duke NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, 169857 Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Coronary artery disease (CAD) is responsible for >50% of heart failures cases. Patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (iLVSD) are known to have poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to patients with a normal ejection fraction. Nevertheless, <1% of patients in coronary revascularization trials to date had iLVSD. The purpose of this review is to describe coronary revascularization modalities in patients with iLVSD and highlight the need for randomized controlled trial evidence comparing these treatments in this patient population. RECENT FINDINGS Network meta-analytic findings of observational studies suggest that PCI is associated with higher rates of mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization but not stroke compared to CABG in iLVSD. In recent years, outcomes for patients undergoing PCI have improved as a result of advances in technologies and techniques. SUMMARY The optimal coronary revascularization modality in patients with iLVSD remains unknown. In observational studies, CABG appears superior to PCI; however, direct randomized evidence is absent and developments in PCI techniques have improved post-PCI outcomes in recent years. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure 3.0 consortium of trials will seek to address the clinical equipoise in coronary revascularization in patients with iLVSD.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Traditionally, the treatment of left main coronary artery disease is recommended coronary artery bypass grafting because of its superior long-term outcomes compared with medical treatment and plain old balloon angioplasty. However, improvement of percutaneous coronary intervention technique and introduction of drug-eluting stent led to change of treatment strategy of left main coronary artery disease through cumulative data for revascularization that based on clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinho Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
| | - Duk-Woo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea.
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dąbrowski EJ, Kożuch M, Dobrzycki S. Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Current Management and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195745. [PMID: 36233613 PMCID: PMC9573137 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to its anatomical features, patients with an obstruction of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) have an increased risk of death. For years, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered as a gold standard for revascularization. However, notable advancements in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) led to its acknowledgement as an important treatment alternative, especially in patients with low and intermediate anatomical complexity. Although recent years brought several random clinical trials that investigated the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous approach in LMCA, there are still uncertainties regarding optimal revascularization strategies. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods of LMCA disease, focusing on percutaneous methods.
Collapse
|
37
|
Gallinoro E, Paolisso P, Di Gioia G, Bermpeis K, Fernandez-Peregrina E, Candreva A, Esposito G, Fabbricatore D, Bertolone DT, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Sonck J, Collet C, De Bruyne B, Barbato E. Deferral of Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Based on Physiological Assessment: Impact on Long-Term Survival. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e026656. [PMID: 36129045 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.026656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Deferring revascularization in patients with nonsignificant stenoses based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes up to 15 years. Whether this holds true in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether FFR provides adjunctive clinical benefit compared with coronary angiography in deferring revascularization of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤50%) undergoing coronary angiography between 2002 and 2010 were screened. We included patients with at least 1 intermediate coronary stenosis (diameter stenosis ≥40%) in whom revascularization was deferred based either on angiography plus FFR (FFR guided) or angiography alone (angiography guided). The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of all-cause death at 10 years. The secondary end point (incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events) was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, any revascularization, and stroke. A total of 840 patients were included (206 in the FFR-guided group and 634 in the angiography-guided group). Median follow-up was 7 years (interquartile range, 3.22-11.08 years). After 1:1 propensity-score matching, baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. All-cause death was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group (94 [45.6%] versus 119 [57.8%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.49-0.85]; P<0.01). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was lower in the FFR-guided group (123 [59.7%] versus 139 [67.5%]; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.95]; P=0.02). Conclusions In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, deferring revascularization of intermediate coronary stenoses based on FFR is associated with a lower incidence of death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Gallinoro
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Translational Medical Sciences University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Naples Italy
| | - Pasquale Paolisso
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Gioia
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | | | | | - Alessandro Candreva
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Cardiology Zurich University Hospital Zurich Switzerland.,PoliToBIO Med Lab Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Politecnico di Torino Italy
| | - Giuseppe Esposito
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Davide Fabbricatore
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Dario Tino Bertolone
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Jozef Bartunek
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | - Marc Vanderheyden
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | - Eric Wyffels
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | - Jeroen Sonck
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | - Carlos Collet
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium
| | - Bernard De Bruyne
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Cardiology Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
| | - Emanuele Barbato
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst Belgium.,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Brings Better Benefits to Heart Failure Hospitalization for Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Ejection Fraction. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092233. [PMID: 36140634 PMCID: PMC9497955 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We compared the outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for revascularization in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and severe coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Between February 2006 and February 2020, a total of 797 patients received coronary angiograms due to left ventricular EF ≤ 40% at our hospital. After excluding diagnoses of dilated cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, prior CABG, acute ST-segment myocardial infarction, and CAD with low Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (≤22), 181 patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) with SYNTAX score >22 underwent CABG or PCI for revascularization. Vascular characteristics as well as echocardiographic data were compared between CABG (n = 58) and PCI (n = 123) groups. Results: A younger age (62 ± 9.0 vs. 66 ± 12.1; p = 0.016), higher new EuroSCORE II (8.6 ± 7.3 vs. 3.2 ± 2.0; p < 0.001), and higher SYNTAX score (40.5 ± 9.8 vs. 35.4 ± 8.3; p < 0.001) were noted in the CABG group compared to those in the PCI group. The CABG group had a significantly higher cardiovascular mortality rate at 1-year (19.6% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.005) and 3-year (25.0% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.027) follow-ups but a lower incidence of heart failure (HF) hospitalization at 1-year (11.1% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.023) and 3-year (3.6% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.001) follow-ups compared to those of the PCI group. Conclusions: Compared with PCI, revascularization with CABG was related to a lower incidence of HF hospitalization but a worse survival outcome in patients with severe CAD and reduced EF. CABG-associated reduction in HF hospitalization was more notable when SYNTAX score ≥33.
Collapse
|
39
|
Brynjarsdottir HB, Johnsen A, Heimisdottir AA, Heidarsdottir SR, Jeppsson A, Sigurdsson MI, Gudbjartsson T. Long-term outcome of surgical revascularization in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction—a population-based cohort study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6571814. [PMID: 35445696 PMCID: PMC9419690 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Helga B Brynjarsdottir
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Landspitali University Hospital , Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Arni Johnsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Landspitali University Hospital , Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | - Anders Jeppsson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martin I Sigurdsson
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Landspitali University Hospital , Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland , Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Tomas Gudbjartsson
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Landspitali University Hospital , Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland , Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ferrell MC, Elizabeth Garrett B, Alicia Tomlin D, Cole Wayant D, Vassar M. Editorial conflicts of interest related to the Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Int J Cardiol 2022; 362:1-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
41
|
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heyman S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CS, Lyon AR, McMurray JJ, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GM, Ruschitzka F, Skibelund AK. Guía ESC 2021 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y crónica. Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
42
|
Velagaleti RS, Vetter J, Parker R, Kurgansky KE, Sun YV, Djousse L, Gaziano JM, Gagnon D, Joseph J. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Coronary Artery Revascularization and Subsequent Risk for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:e011284. [PMID: 35411780 PMCID: PMC10103079 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.121.011284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary revascularization is recommended to treat ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the relations of revascularization-associated ejection fraction (EF) change to subsequent outcomes have not been elucidated. METHODS In 10 071 veterans (mean age 67 years; 1% women; 15% non-White) who underwent a first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2010, and had prerevascularization and postrevascularization EF measured, we calculated delta-EF (postprocedure EF-preprocedure EF). We related delta-EF as a continuous measure and as categories (≤-5, -5<delta-EF<0, delta-EF=0, 0<delta-EF<5, and delta-EF≥5) to death (using Cox regression) and heart failure hospitalization days (using negative binomial regression) in multivariable-adjusted models, for total sample, and PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting strata. RESULTS Over follow-up (mean/maximum 5/14 years) 56% died. Each 5% improvement in delta-EF was associated with statistically significant reductions in death and heart failure hospitalization days of 5% (95% CI, 3%-7%) and 10% (95% CI, 5%-15%), respectively, in the total sample and 6% (95% CI, 4%-8%) and 10% (95% CI, 5%-16%), respectively, in the PCI subgroup. Patients in the highest delta-EF category had 27% (95% CI, 19%-34%) lower mortality (30% [95% CI, 21%-37%] lower in PCI stratum) and ≈40% lower heart failure hospitalization days in total sample and PCI stratum, compared with those in the lowest category. Relations of delta-EF and outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting subgroup did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Revascularization-associated EF improvement was associated with significant reductions in mortality and heart failure hospitalization burden, particularly in the PCI subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghava S Velagaleti
- Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine (R.S.V., J.J.), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Joy Vetter
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Rachel Parker
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Katherine E Kurgansky
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Yan V Sun
- Emory School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (Y.V.S.).,Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA (Y.V.S.)
| | - Luc Djousse
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System.,Division of Aging (L.D., J.M.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System.,Division of Aging (L.D., J.M.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David Gagnon
- Massachusetts VA Epidemiology Research and Information Center (J.V., R.P., K.E.K., L.D., J.M.G., D.G.), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Jacob Joseph
- Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine (R.S.V., J.J.), VA Boston Healthcare System.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.J.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Park S, Park SJ, Park DW. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: ASIA 2022; 2:119-138. [PMID: 36339118 PMCID: PMC9627854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting has been regarded as the standard choice of revascularization for significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. However, in conjunction with remarkable advancement of device technology and adjunctive pharmacology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a more expeditious approach with rapid recovery and is a safe and effective alternative in appropriately selected patients with LMCA disease. Several landmark randomized clinical trials showed that PCI with drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease is a safe option with similar long-term survival rates to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, especially in those with low and intermediate anatomic risk. Although it is expected that the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will determine the next guidelines for the foreseeable future, there are still unresolved and unmet issues of LMCA revascularization and PCI strategy. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the evolution and an update on the management of LMCA disease. With advancements in PCI, clinical outcomes after left main PCI have progressively improved. Unmet needs still exist between clinical practice and the current evidence for left main PCI. Better decision making of revascularization choice and PCI optimization should be emphasized to improve outcomes of LMCA disease. Further research will provide further evidence to resolve conflicting issues on left main PCI.
Collapse
|
44
|
Gu J, Pan JA, Zhang JF, Wang CQ. Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Artery Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:822248. [PMID: 35369292 PMCID: PMC8971278 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.822248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and coronary artery disease (CAD), whether adopting an initial invasive strategy benefits better in clinical outcomes compared with those who received an initial conservative strategy remains inconclusive. Methods With data from the heart failure (HF) cohort study, we analyzed patients who had HFpEF and CAD amenable to the invasive intervention using propensity score matching of 1:1 ratio to compare the initial invasive strategy and the initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was the composite endpoints of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization. Results Of 1,718 patients, 706 were treated with the invasive strategy and 1,012 with the conservative strategy initially. Propensity score matching was used to assemble a matched cohort of 1,320 patients receiving the invasive intervention (660 patients) or the medical therapy alone (660 patients). With a follow-up of 5 years, 378 (57.3%) in the invasive-strategy group and 403 (61.1%) in the conservative-strategy group reached the primary endpoint, and there was no significant difference in the rate of the primary endpoint (P = 0.162). The initial invasive strategy only improved the secondary outcome of cardiovascular hospitalization (P = 0.035). Also, the multivariable Cox regression model revealed that antiplatelet therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB), or statin prescription was associated with a decreased risk of the primary outcome. Conclusion In this well-profiled, propensity-matched cohort of patients with HFpEF and CAD, the addition of invasive intervention to medical therapy did not improve the long-term composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization.
Collapse
|
45
|
Januzzi JL, Ohman EM. Underdiagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease in New-Onset Heart Failure: A Call to Action. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:861-863. [PMID: 35241219 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James L Januzzi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - E Magnus Ohman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang K, Wang L, Cong H, Zhang J, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Li W, Qi W. A comparison of drug-eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting in mildly to moderately ischemic heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2022; 9:1749-1755. [PMID: 35194977 PMCID: PMC9065860 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The best revascularization strategy for patients with ischaemic heart failure (IHF) remains unclear. Current evidence and guidelines mainly focus on patients with severe ischaemic heart failure (ejection fraction [EF] < 35%). There are limited data comparing clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with implantation of drug‐eluting stents (DESs) in patients with mild to moderate ischaemic heart failure (EF 35–50%). It is therefore unknown whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES implantation can provide comparable outcomes to CABG in these patients. Methods and results From January 2016 to December 2017, we enrolled patients with mildly to moderately reduced EF (35–50%) who had undergone PCI with DESs or CABG. Patients with a history of CABG, presented with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or acute heart failure, and patients who had undergone CABG concomitant valvular or aortic surgery were excluded. Propensity score‐matching analysis was performed between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were applied to assess all‐cause mortality and individual end points. A total of 2050 patients (1330 PCIs and 720 CABGs) were included, and median follow‐up was 45 months (interquartile range 40 to 54). There were significant differences in all‐cause death between the two groups: 77 patients in the PCI group and 27 in the CABG group (DES vs. CABG: 5.8% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.045). After propensity score matching for the entire population, 601 matched pairs were obtained. The long‐term cumulative rate of all‐cause death was significantly different between the two groups (DES vs. CABG: 5.8% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.006). No differences were found in the rates of cardiac death (DES vs. CABG: 4.8% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.096), recurrent MI (DES vs. CABG: 4.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.234), and stroke (DES vs. CABG: 6.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.163). The rate of repeat coronary revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (12.1% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.000). Conclusions Considering the higher long‐term survival rate and lower repeat‐revascularization rate, CABG may be superior to DES implantation in patients with mildly to moderately reduced EF (35–50%) and significant CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Wang
- Tianjin Medical University Graduate School, Tianjin, China
| | - Le Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongliang Cong
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingxia Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuecheng Hu
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yingyi Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wenyu Li
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Qi
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:4-131. [PMID: 35083827 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 889] [Impact Index Per Article: 444.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Coordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Coordinator) (Germany), Magdy Abdelhamid (Egypt), Victor Aboyans (France), Stamatis Adamopoulos (Greece), Stefan D. Anker (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Riccardo Asteggiano (Italy), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Antoni Bayes-Genis (Spain), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Werner Budts (Belgium), Maja Cikes (Croatia), Kevin Damman (Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Polychronis Dilaveris (Greece), Heinz Drexel (Austria), Justin Ezekowitz (Canada), Volkmar Falk (Germany), Laurent Fauchier (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Alan Fraser (United Kingdom), Norbert Frey (Germany), Chris P. Gale (United Kingdom), Finn Gustafsson (Denmark), Julie Harris (United Kingdom), Bernard Iung (France), Stefan Janssens (Belgium), Mariell Jessup (United States of America), Aleksandra Konradi (Russia), Dipak Kotecha (United Kingdom), Ekaterini Lambrinou (Cyprus), Patrizio Lancellotti (Belgium), Ulf Landmesser (Germany), Christophe Leclercq (France), Basil S. Lewis (Israel), Francisco Leyva (United Kingdom), AleVs Linhart (Czech Republic), Maja-Lisa Løchen (Norway), Lars H. Lund (Sweden), Donna Mancini (United States of America), Josep Masip (Spain), Davor Milicic (Croatia), Christian Mueller (Switzerland), Holger Nef (Germany), Jens-Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Michel Noutsias (Germany), Steffen E. Petersen (United Kingdom), Anna Sonia Petronio (Italy), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Evgeny Schlyakhto (Russia), Petar Seferovic (Serbia), Michele Senni (Italy), Marta Sitges (Spain), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Carlo G. Tocchetti (Italy), Rhian M. Touyz (United Kingdom), Carsten Tschoepe (Germany), Johannes Waltenberger (Germany/Switzerland) All experts involved in the development of these guidelines have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and published in a supplementary document simultaneously to the guidelines. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines For the Supplementary Data which include background information and detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis for the guidelines see European Heart Journal online.
Collapse
|
48
|
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW, Fremes SE, Gaudino MF, Goldberger ZD, Grant MC, Jaswal JB, Kurlansky PA, Mehran R, Metkus TS, Nnacheta LC, Rao SV, Sellke FW, Sharma G, Yong CM, Zwischenberger BA. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:e21-e129. [PMID: 34895950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 558] [Impact Index Per Article: 279.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The guideline for coronary artery revascularization replaces the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines, providing a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. STRUCTURE Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Coronary revascularization is an important therapeutic option when managing patients with coronary artery disease. The 2021 coronary artery revascularization guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with coronary artery disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW, Fremes SE, Gaudino MF, Goldberger ZD, Grant MC, Jaswal JB, Kurlansky PA, Mehran R, Metkus TS, Nnacheta LC, Rao SV, Sellke FW, Sharma G, Yong CM, Zwischenberger BA. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022; 145:e18-e114. [PMID: 34882435 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
50
|
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW, Fremes SE, Gaudino MF, Goldberger ZD, Grant MC, Jaswal JB, Kurlansky PA, Mehran R, Metkus TS, Nnacheta LC, Rao SV, Sellke FW, Sharma G, Yong CM, Zwischenberger BA. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 145:e4-e17. [PMID: 34882436 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM The executive summary of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions coronary artery revascularization guideline provides the top 10 items readers should know about the guideline. In the full guideline, the recommendations replace the 2011 coronary artery bypass graft surgery guideline and the 2011 and 2015 percutaneous coronary intervention guidelines. This summary offers a patient-centric approach to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization, as well as the supporting documentation to encourage their use. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2019 to September 2019, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, CINHL Complete, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2021, were also considered. Structure: Recommendations from the earlier percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery guidelines have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians in caring for patients undergoing coronary revascularization. This summary includes recommendations, tables, and figures from the full guideline that relate to the top 10 take-home messages. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, supportive text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in the development of this guideline.
Collapse
|