Cardioprotection During Therapeutic Radiation Treatment

Association of cancer treatment with excess heart age among five-year young breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Data evaluating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk by cancer treatment among young women (≤ 40 years) with breast cancer are limited.

METHODS

Among 372 five-year breast cancer survivors aged 30-40 years from the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, we assessed the association of cancer treatments (anthracyclines, trastuzumab, radiation/laterality, endocrine therapy) and excess heart age (difference between predicted 10-year CVD risk as assessed by adapted Framingham Risk Score and chronological age), prevalent elevated excess heart age (≥ 2 years), and worsening excess heart age (change of ≥ 2 excess heart age years) at breast cancer diagnosis and two- and five-year follow-up using multivariable linear and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Most women had stage I or II (79%), ER + (71%), or PR + (65%) breast cancer. At diagnosis, women had little excess heart age by treatment receipt (range of means = -0.52,0.91 years). Left-sided radiation (β = 2.49,SE = 0.96,p = 0.01) was associated with higher excess heart age at five-year follow-up. For prevalent elevated excess heart age (two-year = 26%;five-year = 27%), women treated with right-sided radiation had increased risk at two-years (OR = 2.17,95%CI = 1.12-4.19), yet at five-years, associations were observed after any radiation (OR = 1.92,95%CI = 1.09-3.41), especially after left-sided (OR = 2.13,95%CI = 1.09-3.41) radiation. No associations were observed between systemic treatments and prevalent elevated excess heart age or any treatments with worsening excess heart age.

CONCLUSIONS

Among young breast cancer survivors, radiation, but not other cancer treatments, was associated with elevated excess heart age.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

CVD risk tools that incorporate cancer treatment, such as radiation, are needed to identify high risk young breast cancer survivors given the long survivorship and long latency of cardiovascular disease.

Comparison of cardiovascular disease risk in women with and without breast cancer: secondary data analysis with the 2014-2018 korean national health and nutrition examination survey

BACKGROUND

Aging breast cancer survivors may be at an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but little is known about CVD risk assessment and breast cancer in Korean women. We hypothesized that Korean breast cancer survivors would have higher risks of future CVD within the next 10 years (i.e., Framingham Risk Score [FRS]) than women without cancer.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To compare FRS-based CVD risks in women with and without breast cancer based on propensity score matching; and (2) To explore adiposity-related measures in relation to FRS in Korean women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Using the cross-sectional data from the 2014-2018 Korean National Health and National Survey (KNHANES), we identified 136 women with breast cancer aged 30-74 years who had no other cancer and no CVD. The comparison group of 544 women with no cancer were selected by 1:4 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching based on breast cancer diagnosis. CVD risk was assessed by FRS based on multiple traditional risk factors (e.g., cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking). Adiposity was measured by physical examination, including body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Physical activity and health behaviors were assessed by self-reports.

RESULTS

Women with breast cancer (mean age of 57 years) had similar FRS levels at a low-risk category (< 10%) to women with no cancer (4.9% vs. 5.5%). Breast cancer survivors (mean 8.5 survival years) presented at significantly lower levels of total cholesterol, BMI, and WHtR (all p values < 0.05) than their counterpart. Within the breast cancer group, WHtR ≥ 0.5 was associated with higher FRS, compared to WHtR < 0.5. FRS was not different by survival < 5 years or ≥ 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

FRS-based CVD risks were not different in Korean, mostly postmenopausal, women by breast cancer status. Whereas breast cancer survivors had even lower levels of lipid and adiposity measures than women without cancer, those values indicating borderline cardiometabolic risk suggest continued screening and management efforts for these aging women. Future studies are needed to examine longitudinal trajectories of CVD risk factors and CVD outcomes among Korean breast cancer survivors.

Trends in heart disease mortality among breast cancer survivors in the US, 1975-2017

Purpose

Heart disease is a significant concern among breast cancer survivors, in part due to cardiotoxic treatments including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Long-term trends in heart disease mortality have not been well characterized. We examined heart disease mortality trends among US breast cancer survivors by treatment type.

Methods

We included first primary invasive breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1975 and 2016 (aged 18–84; survived 12 + months; received initial chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery) in the SEER-9 Database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 10-year cumulative heart disease mortality estimates accounting for competing events were calculated by calendar year of diagnosis and initial treatment regimen. P_trends were assessed using Poisson regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

Of 516,916 breast cancer survivors, 40,812 died of heart disease through 2017. Heart disease SMRs declined overall from 1975–1979 to 2010–2016 (SMR 1.01 [95%CI: 0.98, 1.03] to 0.74 [0.69, 0.79], p_trend < 0.001). This decline was also observed for survivors treated with radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. A sharper decline in heart disease SMRs was observed from 1975 to 1989 for left-sided radiotherapy, compared to right-sided. In contrast, there was a non-significant increasing trend in SMRs for chemotherapy alone, and significant by regional stage (p_trend = 0.036). Largest declines in 10-year cumulative mortality were observed from 1975–1984 to 2005–2016 among surgery only: 7.02% (95%CI: 6.80%, 7.23%) to 4.68% (95%CI: 4.39%, 4.99%) and radiotherapy alone: 6.35% (95%CI: 5.95%, 6.77%) to 2.94% (95%CI: 2.73%, 3.16%).

Conclusions

We observed declining heart disease mortality trends by most treatment types yet increasing for regional stage patients treated with chemotherapy alone, highlighting a need for additional studies with detailed treatment data and cardiovascular management throughout cancer survivorship.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06515-5.

What Does a Cardio-oncology Service Offer to the Oncologist and the Haematologist?

Cardio-oncology is an emerging subspecialty arising from the need for multidisciplinary collaboration to address the increasing prominence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among cancer patients. This overview outlines the case for establishing cardio-oncology services and defines the ways in which these services benefit cancer patients. The primary objective of cardio-oncology is to manage CVDs in order to allow cancer patients to complete the best cancer treatments safely and with minimal interruption. In the decades since the first discovery of heart failure induced by anthracycline chemotherapy, both cardiovascular and oncological science have advanced considerably. Cardio-oncology services aim to bring together expertise from these two fast moving fields in order to provide optimal evidence-based care for cancer patients with CVDs. Here we discuss the basis of cardio-oncology services by presenting their rationale and key components, as well as their essential roles in education, training and research. At each stage of the cancer care pathway, a cardio-oncology service can add value by ensuring cancer patients have timely access to specialist care backed up by cutting edge diagnostic tools and treatment options, as well as holistic supports. We highlight areas of recent and upcoming developments in the field that are likely to change established clinical practice. Improved cardiac imaging modalities can detect chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction earlier and are also essential for the prompt diagnosis of an expanding range of cardiovascular effects complicating newer cancer therapeutics, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted therapies. Modern cancer therapy has dramatically improved cancer survival and as such CVD is becoming one of the principal determinants of overall outcome for cancer patients. A dedicated cardio-oncology service can facilitate the optimisation of cardiovascular treatment and enable the completion of cancer therapy. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach is key to achieving these objectives.