Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Heart Failure And Atrial Fibrillation

Milvexian vs apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: The LIBREXIA atrial fibrillation trial rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter; however, bleeding remains a significant concern, limiting their use. Milvexian is an oral Factor XIa inhibitor that may offer similar anticoagulant efficacy with less bleeding risk.

METHODS

LIBREXIA AF (NCT05757869) is a global phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven trial to compare milvexian with apixaban in participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Participants are randomly assigned to milvexian 100 mg or apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg per label indication) twice daily. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate if milvexian is noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety objective is to evaluate if milvexian is superior to apixaban in reducing the endpoint of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding events and the composite endpoint of ISTH major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding events. In total, 15,500 participants from approximately 1,000 sites in over 30 countries are planned to be enrolled. They will be followed until both 430 primary efficacy outcome events and 530 principal safety events are observed, which is estimated to take approximately 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The LIBREXIA AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of the oral Factor XIa inhibitor milvexian compared with apixaban in participants with either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757869.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients on chronic dialysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

METHODS

Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA.

RESULTS

A total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage 4 chronic kidney disease: a real-world experience

It is still uncertain whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) perform better than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in subjects with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of the study was to compare safety and effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs in patients with NVAF and stage 4 CKD (creatinine clearance 15-29 mL/min). We searched the hospital databases of two academic centers to retrospectively identify patients with stage 4 CKD who were on treatment with DOACs or VKAs for NVAF. Safety was the primary outcome of the study and was assessed in terms of incidence of major bleeding (MB). Secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and death for any cause. A total of 176 patients (102 on DOACs and 74 on VKAs) were found and included in the analysis. The incidence rate of MB was not statistically different between groups (8.6 per 100 patients-year in the DOAC group and 5.6 per 100 patients-year in the VKA group). Rates of IS/SSE and CRNMB were statistically similar in the two treatment groups, as well. There were less deaths for any cause in the DOAC group than in the VKA group (8.6 and 15.8 per 100 patients-year, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant. This study found no difference in terms of safety and effectiveness between patients with NVAF and stage 4 CKD treated with DOACs and VKAs. Larger prospective or randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Milvexian: An Oral, Bioavailable Factor XIa Inhibitor

Direct oral anticoagulants have a dose-dependent increased bleeding risk which limits use in certain populations. Studies in both animals and humans with inherited variations in factor XI levels provide a theoretical basis for a drug target capable of addressing current unmet needs. Milvexian is an oral factor XIa inhibitor that has the potential to provide robust anticoagulant effect without increased bleeding compared with current standard of care. Several key studies in the preclinical, phase I, and phase II stages have reported promising safety data in venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention without compromising hemostasis. The planned phase III trials will examine the efficacy of milvexian for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and atrial fibrillation.

Best anticoagulation strategy with and without appendage occlusion for stroke-prophylaxis in postablation atrial fibrillation patients with cardiac amyloidosis

INTRODUCTION

Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and amyloidosis increase stroke risk. We evaluated the best anticoagulation strategy in AF patients with coexistent amyloidosis.

METHODS

Consecutive AF patients with concomitant amyloidosis were divided into two groups based on the postablation stroke-prophylaxis approach; group 1: left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in eligible patients and group 2: oral anticoagulation (OAC). Group 1 patients were further divided into Gr. 1A: LAAO + half-does NOAC (HD-NOAC) for 6 months followed by aspirin 81 mg/day and Gr. 1B: LAAO + HD-NOAC. In group 1 patients, with complete occlusion at the 45-day transesophageal echocardiogram, patients were switched to aspirin, 81 mg/day at 6 months. In case of leak, or dense "smoke" in the left atrium (LA) or enlarged LA, they were placed on long-term half-dose (HD) NOAC. Group 2 patients remained on full-dose NOAC during the whole study period.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were included in the analysis; group 1: 56 and group 2: 36. After the 45-day TEE, 31 patients from group 1 remained on baby-aspirin and 25 on HD NOAC. At 1-year follow-up, four stroke, one TIA and six device-thrombus were reported in group 1A, compared to none in patients in group 1B (5/31 vs. 0/25, p = .03). No bleeding events were reported in group 1, whereas group 2 had five bleeding events (one subdural hematoma, one retinal hemorrhage, and four GI bleedings). Additionally, one stroke was reported in group 2 that happened during brief discontinuation of OAC.

CONCLUSION

In patients with coexistent AF and amyloidosis, half-dose NOAC following LAAO was observed to be the safest stroke-prophylaxis strategy.

Current Gaps in the Provision of Safe and Effective Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation and the Potential for Factor XI-Directed Therapeutics

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation is rapidly increasing, in large part due to the aging of the population. Atrial fibrillation is known to increase the risk of thromboembolic stroke by 5 times, but it has been evident for decades that well-managed anticoagulation therapy can greatly attenuate this risk. Despite advances in pharmacology (such as the shift from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants) that have increased the safety and convenience of chronic oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, a preponderance of recent observational data indicates that protection from stroke is poorly achieved on a population basis. This outcomes deficit is multifactorial in origin, stemming from a combination of underprescribing of anticoagulants (often as a result of bleeding concerns by prescribers), limitations of the drugs themselves (drug-drug interactions, bioaccumulation in renal insufficiency, short half-lives that result in lapses in therapeutic effect, etc), and suboptimal patient adherence that results from lack of understanding/education, polypharmacy, fear of bleeding, forgetfulness, and socioeconomic barriers, among other obstacles. Often this adherence is not reported to treating clinicians, further subverting efforts to optimize care. A multidisciplinary, interprofessional panel of clinicians met during the 2023 International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress to discuss these gaps in therapy, how they can be more readily recognized, and the potential for factor XI-directed anticoagulants to improve the safety and efficacy of stroke prevention. A full appreciation of this potential requires a reevaluation of traditional teaching about the "coagulation cascade" and decoupling the processes that result in (physiologic) hemostasis and (pathologic) thrombosis. The panel discussion is summarized and presented here.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Saudi Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly heightens stroke risk, which can be mitigated through anticoagulation therapy. Although warfarin was traditionally employed for this purpose, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is on the rise.

METHODS

This retrospective study, which spanned from June 2016 to January 2018, focused on adult patients diagnosed with AF. Their treatments, either via warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran), were evaluated. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 21; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin in preventing thromboembolic complications among Saudi patients with AF.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients with AF, averaging 66 ± 14 years of age, were part of the study. Among them, there were slightly more female patients (205 or 51.8%). The majority of patients (223 or 56.3%) were treated with a DOAC, while the rest (173 or 43.7%) received warfarin. Furthermore, 93 patients (23.5%) were taking anti-platelet drugs. Statistically, the rate of ischemic stroke was significantly higher among patients treated with DOACs than with warfarin (p=0.005), but bleeding rates were similar in both groups. Specifically, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban showed a significant association with the occurrence of stroke when compared to warfarin (p=0.012 and p=007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, both DOACs and warfarin presented similar results regarding hemorrhagic complications when treating AF patients. However, the DOACs apixaban and rivaroxaban displayed higher risks of ischemic stroke compared to warfarin.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgical resection of primary lower extremity bone or soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) following resection of lower extremity primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 2083 patients from the PearlDiver database who underwent resection of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity from January 2010 to October 2021 and prescribed LMWH or DOAC within 90-days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were comparison of postoperative incidence and odds of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and bleeding complications within 90-days following resection.

RESULTS

Patients prescribed DOACs had a greater odds of DVT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.41; p = 0.024) and PE (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.96-5.86; p < 0.001) within 90-days following resection of bone sarcoma when compared with the LMWH cohort. Patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcomas also had greater odds DVT (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09-2.49; p = 0.016) and PE (OR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.52-4.54; p < 0.001) in the DOAC cohort. There was no difference in the odds of bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated an increased incidence and odds of VTE, but not bleeding complications, when using DOACs versus LMWH after primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Factor XI/XIa inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism: A narrative review

During the past decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have advanced and simplified the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there remains a high incidence of bleeds, which calls for agents that have a reduced risk of bleeding. Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is associated with lower rates of venous thrombosis and stroke compared to the general population with a lower risk of bleeding. In conjunction with this, phase 2 studies have demonstrated safety and the potential for reduced thrombotic events with FXI inhibitors as compared to currently available medications. The aim of this review is to summarize key data on the clinical pharmacology of FXI, the latest developments in clinical trials of FXI inhibitors, and to describe the efficacy and safety profiles of FXI inhibitors for the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolism.

Clinical Features and Impact on One Year Prognosis of Prescribing Low Doses of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Agents in a Middle Eastern Population with Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis from the Jordan Atrial Fibrillation Study

Introduction

Direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) are indicated for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Reduced doses of DOACs are indicated in patients who have renal impairment and according to age and weight criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency, clinical factors, and impact on 1-year prognosis of underdosing DOACs.

Methods

Data of patients enrolled in the Jordan AF (JoFib) study and who were followed for 1 year was used to compare patients prescribed standard dose with those who were underdosed.

Results

There were 672 patients (76.2%) who were prescribed standard dose and 210 patients (23.8%) who were underdosed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Factors associated with underdosing were enrollment from an outpatient vs hospital site, moderate- or high-risk HAS-BLED score, an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%), a history of heart failure, or current use of diuretics. At 1 year, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 12.2% in standard dose vs 13.3% in the underdose group (P = .82), stroke or systemic embolism was 3.6% in the standard dose vs 3.8% in the underdose group (P = .67), and major bleeding was 2.2% in the standard dose vs 3.3% in the underdose group (P = .35).

Conclusions

About (25%) of patients were underdosed. Factors associated with underdosing were outpatient (vs hospital) center enrollment, moderate- or high-risk HAS-BLED score, abnormal LVEF (<50%), history of heart failure, and current use of diuretics. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events of mortality and major morbidity at 1-year follow-up between the standard dose and the underdose groups.

Temporal trends in admissions for atrial fibrillation and severe bleeding in England: an 18-year longitudinal analysis

Objective. Temporal trends in admissions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and severe bleeding associated with AF vary worldwide. We aimed to explore their temporal trends in England and their relation to the introduction of DOACs in 2014 in the UK. Design. This longitudinal ecological study utilised aggregated data that was extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics database, which captured annual admissions for AF and severe bleeding associated with AF between 2001 and 2018. Trends in admissions over the study period and across age groups, gender and regions in England were assessed. Results. In total, there were 11,292,177 admissions for AF and 324,851 admissions for severe bleeding associated with AF. There was a steady rise in admissions for AF from 2001 to 2017 (204,808 to 1,109,295; p for trend<.001). A similar trend was observed for severe bleeding (4940 to 30,169; p for trend <.001), but the increase dropped slightly between 2013 and 2014 and continued thereafter. Conclusions. There was a rise in admissions for AF and severe bleeding in England between 2001 and 2018. There is little evidence that the slight drop in admissions for severe bleeding between 2013 and 2014 may have been caused by the introduction of DOACs in 2014. Contributors to these trends need urgent exploration.

Comparing U.S. and Canadian treatment patterns on venous thromboembolism outcomes in the GARFIELD-VTE registry

BACKGROUND

Economically developed countries continue to find that venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare baseline risk profiles and patient workflow patterns between the United States (U.S.) and Canadian management of VTE patients from 2014 to 2017.

METHODS

The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD-VTE) is a prospective, observational study of 10,679 patients with objectively confirmed VTE, followed for 3 years. In total 1101 patients enrolled in the U.S. and Canada were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

Median age and body mass index were comparable between the U.S. (60.5; 30.2) and Canadian (59.7; 29) patients. A higher percentage of U.S. patients were black (n = 128, 24.1 %; n = 22, 3.9 %) and had a higher VTE-associated risk profile, including immobilization, hospitalization, and recent surgery. U.S. patients had a higher combined DVT and PE primary diagnoses (20.3 %) and were more likely to be treated in hospitals (77.2 %) than Canadians (13.3 %; 48.1 %). Direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) was nearly two-fold more frequent in Canadian patients (n = 218, 39.2 %) at the end of 3 years in comparison to the U.S. (n = 118, 23.0 %). Adjusted for sex, recent bleed event, heart failure, chronic immobilization, family history of VTE, history of cancer and prior VTE, and renal insufficiency, the risk of all-cause mortality was 51.9 % higher in patients from the U.S. compared to those in Canada after 3 years. Patients from the U.S. also had a higher likelihood of hospitalization, major bleeding, and recurrent VTE after controlling for prior history and comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSION

Higher rates of adverse VTE-associated outcomes in the U.S. may be attributed to different baseline risk profiles, facility care, and distribution of specialists and their subsequent treatment strategies.

TYPE OF RESEARCH

Global, multicentre, non-interventional, prospective registry titled Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - Venous Thromboembolism (GARFIELD-VTE).

KEY FINDINGS

531 U.S. and 557 Canadians patients included in study. DOAC use more frequent in Canadian patients after 3 years than U.S. (39.2 % vs. 23.0 %, respectively). Adjusted for sex, recent bleed event, heart failure, chronic immobilization, family history of VTE, history of cancer and prior VTE, and renal insufficiency, all-cause mortality risk remained higher in U.S. patients vs. Canadian patients after 3 years. U.S. patients had higher likelihood of hospitalization, major bleeding, and recurrent VTE.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Higher rates of adverse VTE-associated outcomes in the U.S. may be attributed to different baseline risk profiles, facility care, and composition of specialists and their subsequent treatment strategies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY

Global, multicentre, non-interventional, prospective registry titled Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - Venous Thromboembolism (GARFIELD-VTE). Higher rates of adverse VTE-associated outcomes were observed in U.S. patients vs Canadian patients, which may be attributed to different baseline risk profiles, facility care, and distribution of specialists and their subsequent treatment strategies.

Time Trends in Patient Characteristics, Anticoagulation Treatment, and Prognosis of Incident Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in the Netherlands

Importance

The temporal trend in adverse events regarding stroke prevention for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era was rarely investigated comprehensively, especially taking into account potential changes in patient characteristics and anticoagulation treatment.

Objective

To investigate time trends in patient characteristics, anticoagulation treatment, and prognosis of patients with incident NVAF in the Netherlands.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study assessed patients with incident NVAF initially recognized within a hospitalization between 2014 and 2018, using data from Statistics Netherlands. Participants were followed-up for 1 year from the hospital admission at which the incident NVAF diagnosis was made or until death, whichever occurred first. Data were analyzed from January 15, 2021, to March 8, 2023.

Exposure

Calendar year of the incident NVAF diagnosis, according to which the participants were categorized into 5 cohorts.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were baseline patient characteristics, anticoagulation treatment, and occurrence of ischemic stroke or major bleeding within the 1-year follow-up after incident NVAF.

Results

Between 2014 and 2018, 301 301 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.2 [11.9] years; 169 748 [56.3%] male patients) experienced incident NVAF in the Netherlands, each of whom was categorized into 1 of 5 cohorts by calendar year. Baseline patient characteristics were broadly the same between cohorts with a mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years [doubled], diabetes, stroke [doubled], vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category [female]) score of 2.9 (1.7). The median (IQR) proportion of days covered by OACs (ie, vitamin K antagonists or DOACs) within the 1-year follow-up increased from 56.99% (0%-86.30%) to 75.62% (0%-94.52%), and DOACs increased from 5102 patients (13.5%) to 32 314 patients (72.0%) among those who received OACs, gradually replacing VKAs as the first choice of OACs. Over the course of the study, there were statistically significant decreases in the 1-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke (from 1.63% [95% CI, 1.52%-1.73%] to 1.39% [95% CI, 1.30%-1.48%) and major bleeding (from 2.50% [95% CI, 2.37%-2.63%] to 2.07% [95% CI, 1.96%-2.19%]), and the association was consistent after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics and excluding those with preexisting chronic anticoagulation.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study of patients with incident NVAF diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 in the Netherlands found similar baseline characteristics, increased OAC use with DOACs being favored over time, and improved 1-year prognosis. Comorbidity burden, potential underuse of anticoagulation medications, and specific subgroups of patients with NVAF remain directions for future investigations and further improvement.

Anticoagulation Prescribing Patterns in Intensive Care Unit Patients Admitted with Prehospital Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: A Single Academic Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current prescribing practices of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and the associated clinical outcomes, including the incidence of major bleeding episodes and the need for intervention (endoscopic, surgical, or interventional radiology guided).

DESIGN

Observational, retrospective chart review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Single large academic center study. Participants included patients with critical illness who were admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) at Mayo Clinic from January 1st, 2012, until May 4th, 2018. Adult ICU patients with a DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or edoxaban) listed as one of the active medications at the time of hospital admission were included.

RESULTS

37 249 patients in medical and surgical intensive care units were screened for the study period. After excluding patients who did not qualify, 558 unique encounters were included. The median age was 69 (IQR 59-78) years; most patients were male, white Caucasians, and had a median SOFA score of 4. After excluding the patients who had major bleeding episodes in the first 24 hours, 188 (39%) were continued on the same DOAC therapy, 204 (42%) were discontinued without transitioning to another agent, and 95 (20%) were transitioned to another agent. Finally, 410 (84%) were dismissed on DOAC therapy at the end of hospitalization. The difference in the continuation rate of the same DOAC agent beyond 24 hours, discontinuation without transition to an alternate agent, or discontinuation of DOAC with a transition to an alternate anticoagulation agent was not statistically significant (P = .60). A total of 52 major bleeding events were identified. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common bleeding complication [n (%): 34 (65)], followed by intra-abdominal and peri-procedural bleeding [7 (13.5) and 7 (13.5)]. Thirty-three (65%) patients had a major bleeding complication requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center retrospective study describes the current prescribing practices and preliminary outcomes in ICU patients with prehospital use of DOACs. Up to 20% of the patients were transitioned to a different agent within 24 hours of ICU admission, whereas a significant proportion of patients (42%) had anticoagulation discontinued altogether. Most patients who suffered a major bleeding episode required either endoscopic or surgical intervention to control bleeding.

How we approach the perioperative management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia receiving continuous cancer-directed therapies

Historically, invasive procedures and surgeries were deferred in patients with haematological malignancies including advanced stage chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) because of limited life expectancy. However, novel, and often continuous, treatments have markedly improved outcomes in CLL. Some patients may expect years of treatment response and disease control, overcoming the short life expectancy that deters interventionalists. Such patients now often undergo various invasive procedures including major surgery. To inform peri-operative management, we summarize the relevant side effects and drug interactions of continuous CLL therapies, highlight potential surgical risks, and provide recommendations on withholding specific CLL drugs around invasive procedures.

Risk of Bleeding Among Individuals on Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: An Academic Medical Center Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Previous research has identified risk factors that may affect the risk of bleeding when individuals are exposed to oral anticoagulants. It is unclear if the risk continues to exist with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of bleeding in patients on DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and betrixaban) based on known risk factors including demographics, medical conditions, and concomitant medications. This study was a retrospective analysis using electronic health record data from the University of Utah Hospital (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine) of individuals receiving a DOAC from 2015 to 2020. The primary outcome of interest was bleeding events [gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, other anatomical site bleeding (excluding GI), and any bleeding] recorded in the electronic health record that codes using International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th codes. Known risk factors were used to predict bleeding using multivariate logistic regression. A total of 5492 patients received a DOAC during the study period. Less than half the study population were female (2287, 41.6%). During the follow-up, there were 988 patients (18.0%) experiencing a bleeding event. Of them, 351 patients (35.5%) had a GI bleeding event. Significant risk factors of GI bleeding included clopidogrel [odds ratio (OR) 1.71; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-2.52] and previous GI bleeding episodes (OR 7.73; 95% CI, 5.36-11.16). Exposure to corticosteroids (OR 1.50; 95% CI, 1.20-1.87) and previous GI bleeding (OR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.35) were associated with an increase in bleeding at other anatomical sites (not GI included).

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Milvexian in Participants with Normal Renal Function and Participants with Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of moderate or severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of milvexian.

METHODS

This open-label, parallel-group study assessed the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single oral 60 mg dose of milvexian in participants with normal renal function (n = 8; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and participants with moderate (n = 8; eGFR ≥ 30 to ≤ 59 mL/min/1.73 m2) or severe (n = 8; eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. Regression analysis was performed using linear regression of log-transformed PK parameters versus eGFR.

RESULTS

Milvexian was well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or serious bleeding reported. The maximum milvexian concentration (Cmax) was similar for all groups. Based on a regression analysis of milvexian concentration versus eGFR, participants with eGFR values of 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, had area under the curve (AUC) values that were 41% and 54% greater than in participants with normal renal function. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was similar for the three groups (4.5-5.0 h). The half-life increased for participants with moderate (18.0 h) or severe (17.7 h) renal impairment compared with those with normal renal function (13.8 h).

CONCLUSION

A single dose of milvexian 60 mg was safe and well tolerated in participants with normal renal function and moderate or severe renal impairment. There was a similar increase in milvexian exposure between the moderate and severe renal groups.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03196206, first posted 22 June 2017).

Analysis of Adverse Events in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation with Oral Anticoagulants: Data from the "ANTEY" Observational Study

Rationale. Therapy with oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is based on finding the optimal balance of efficacy and safety of these drugs. Data from observational studies are an additional source of information for the adverse events (AEs) of pharmacotherapy. Objective: To investigate pharmacotherapy AEs with OACs in the “ANTEY” prospective observational study in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Material and Methods: A total of 201 people were enrolled (83 (41.3%) were women). The age of subjects was 71.1 ± 8.7 years (data presented as mean with standard deviation). The study protocol included two face-to-face visits (contacts V0 and V1) and one follow-up (FU) phone contact which were made with the patient at an interval of 6 months. At V0, all patients were recommended to take one of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs); starting from V1, warfarin could have been prescribed or NOAC could have been changed. Information about AEs and OACsadministration was collected at V0, V1, and FU. Results. During 1 year of observation, 15 out of 201 patients refused to take OACs, and 186 initiated the recommended drug. Rivaroxaban was initiated in 93 patients, dabigatran in 46, apixaban in 40, and warfarin in 7 patients. There were 55 AEs, 25 of which were serious (SAEs), including 4 deaths. Of the 30 AEs, there were 18 bleedings: eight (8.6%) occurred with the administration of rivaroxaban; four (8.5%) with dabigatran, three (7.5%) with apixaban, and three (42.9%) with warfarin. Differences in the incidence of bleeding events between NOACs and warfarin are statistically significant (p = 0.025). Any AEs increased the chance of nonadherence to treatment nine-fold: OR = 9.2 (CI95%: 3.6−23.5), p < 0.0001. Conclusions. The most typical and common AEs in real-world clinical practice settings treatment with OACs were bleedings, the incidence of which was approximately 8% to 9% in the treatment with NOACs and was much higher with warfarin, bleedings in the treatment with OACs are statistically significantly associated with nonadherence to the use of these drugs in the future.

A systematic review of statistical methodology used to evaluate progression of chronic kidney disease using electronic healthcare records

BACKGROUND

Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are a useful resource to study chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression prior to starting dialysis, but pose methodological challenges as kidney function tests are not done on everybody, nor are tests evenly spaced. We sought to review previous research of CKD progression using renal function tests in EHRs, investigating methodology used and investigators' recognition of data quality issues.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched for studies investigating CKD progression using EHRs in 4 databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health and Web of Science) available as of August 2021. Of 80 articles eligible for review, 59 (74%) were published in the last 5.5 years, mostly using EHRs from the UK, USA and East Asian countries. 33 articles (41%) studied rates of change in eGFR, 23 (29%) studied changes in eGFR from baseline and 15 (19%) studied progression to binary eGFR thresholds. Sample completeness data was available in 44 studies (55%) with analysis populations including less than 75% of the target population in 26 studies (33%). Losses to follow-up went unreported in 62 studies (78%) and 11 studies (14%) defined their cohort based on complete data during follow up. Methods capable of handling data quality issues and other methodological challenges were used in a minority of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies based on renal function tests in EHRs may have overstated reliability of findings in the presence of informative missingness. Future renal research requires more explicit statements of data completeness and consideration of i) selection bias and representativeness of sample to the intended target population, ii) ascertainment bias where follow-up depends on risk, and iii) the impact of competing mortality. We recommend that renal progression studies should use statistical methods that take into account variability in renal function, informative censoring and population heterogeneity as appropriate to the study question.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure and preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patient prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) is increasing, and anticoagulation for patients from heterogeneous backgrounds with both conditions remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we are aiming to compare the effectiveness and safety of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in AF patients with HF and preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction.

Methods and results

We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases until January 2022. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding, respectively. We abstracted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compiled them using a random-effects model. We analyzed data of 266,291 patients from 10 studies. By comparing NOACs with warfarin, patients with AF and HF have reduced the risk of SSE (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.80–0.91), major bleeding (RR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.90), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.46–0.63). Further analyses based on the HF subtypes showed that NOACs reduced the chances of SSE (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.53–0.94) in the HFrEF group and major bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.95) in HFmrEF and HFpEF groups. There were no differences regarding SSE (RR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.76–1.09) in HFmrEF and HFpEF groups and major bleeding (RR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.79–1.23) in the HFrEF group.

Conclusion

For patients with AF and HF, NOACs have better or similar effectiveness and safety than warfarin, but the stroke prevention superiority of NOACs over warfarin varies in different HF subtypes.

Treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may lead to the development of chronic heart failure (CHF). Each condition predisposes to the other, requiring a careful choice of the treatment strategy. This article is devoted to the prevalence and prognostic implications of both diseases. The article presents data from meta-analyzes related to the management of this group of patients. The aspects of rhythm control strategy in AF and concomitant CHF are described according to the recent studies and clinical guidelines. The features of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF and CHF are outlined. Much attention is given to the importance of the safety profile of the anticoagulant therapy in terms of the bleeding risk in patients with concomitant AF and CHF.