Intracranial Hemorrhage, Outcome, and Mortality After Intra-Arterial Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Under Oral Anticoagulants

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants: Results From the MR CLEAN Registry

Background and Purpose- The use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) is considered a contra-indication for intravenous thrombolytics as acute treatment of ischemic stroke. However, little is known about the risks and benefits of endovascular treatment in patients on prior OAC. We aim to compare outcomes after endovascular treatment between patients with and without prior use of OAC. Methods- Data of patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by an intracranial anterior circulation occlusion, included in the nationwide, prospective, MR CLEAN Registry between March 2014 and November 2017, were analyzed. Outcomes of interest included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score). Outcomes between groups were compared with (ordinal) logistic regression analyses, adjusted for prognostic factors. Results- Three thousand one hundred sixty-two patients were included in this study, of whom 502 (16%) used OAC. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between patients with and without prior OACs (5% versus 6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.38-1.06]). Patients on OACs had worse functional outcomes than patients without OACs (common odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.47-0.66]). However, this observed difference in functional outcome disappeared after adjustment for prognostic factors (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.74-1.13]). Conclusions- Prior OAC use in patients treated with endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke is not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or worse functional outcome compared with no prior OAC use. Therefore, prior OAC use should not be a contra-indication for endovascular treatment.

Endovascular Stroke Treatment and Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Anticoagulated Patients

Background and Purpose- We aimed to determine the safety and mortality after mechanical thrombectomy in patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Methods- In a multicenter observational cohort study, we used multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate associations of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) with VKA or DOAC prescription before thrombectomy as compared with no anticoagulation. The primary outcomes were the rate of sICH and all-cause mortality at 90 days, incorporating sensitivity analysis regarding confirmed therapeutic anticoagulation. Additionally, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on this topic. Results- Altogether, 1932 patients were included (VKA, n=222; DOAC, n=98; no anticoagulation, n=1612); median age, 74 years (interquartile range, 62-82); 49.6% women. VKA prescription was associated with increased odds for sICH and mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.55 [95% CI, 1.35-4.84] and 1.64 [95% CI, 1.09-2.47]) as compared with the control group, whereas no association with DOAC intake was observed (aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.29-3.35] and 1.35 [95% CI, 0.72-2.53]). Sensitivity analyses considering only patients within the confirmed therapeutic anticoagulation range did not alter the findings. A study-level meta-analysis incorporating data from 7462 patients (855 VKAs, 318 DOACs, and 6289 controls) from 15 observational cohorts corroborated these observations, yielding an increased rate of sICH in VKA patients (aOR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.22-2.17]) but not in DOAC patients (aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.60-1.80]). Conclusions- Patients taking VKA have an increased risk of sICH and mortality after mechanical thrombectomy. The lower risk of sICH associated with DOAC may also be noticeable in the acute setting. Improved selection might be advisable in VKA-treated patients. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03496064. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: CRD42019127464.

MT in anticoagulated patients

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is one of the main treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients on effective anticoagulation. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) has increased, given their efficacy and safety profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of MT in patients on DOA and VKA treatment before stroke onset. We analyzed 2 groups from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke prospective registry: patients on DOA and patients on VKA treated by MT without thrombolysis. Generalized linear mixed models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at end of procedure, number of passes >2, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to anticoagulation subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission NIH Stroke Scale score) as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences. Among 221 patients included, more DOA-treated patients (n = 115, 52%) achieved successful (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score [mTICI] 2b/3) or near complete (mTICI 2c/3) reperfusion at the procedure end than did VKA-treated patients, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DOA vs VKA of 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–7.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.08–3.73), respectively. DOA-treated patients had a lower 90-day mortality risk with an adjusted OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.24–0.89) and a better excellent outcome OR of 2.40 (1.10–5.27). There was no significant between-group difference in hemorrhagic or procedural complications. The study highlights the benefits of DOA compared to VKA. Regarding mortality, excellent outcomes, and recanalization rate, DOA appears to provide a favorable setting for MT treatment in AIS.

Safety of Recanalization Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Anticoagulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis treatment (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT) have been proved as fist-line beneficial option for eligible patients who have acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with major safety concern of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Unfortunately, the emergency management of patients with AIS taking vitamin K antagonists and with international normalized ratio higher than 1.7 or taking new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represents a great challenge. We aim to comprehensively determine the safety of EVT in patients under prior-stroke anticoagulants and IVT in patients under NOAC use.

METHODS

Clinical researches published in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases up to December 2017 were identified for analysis. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted to evaluate the robustness of the conclusions.

RESULTS

Overall, 9 studies involving 3885 patients met the inclusion criteria. The rate of sICH (risk ratio [RR] = .94, 95% CI = .61-1.47, P = .799), mortality (P = .495), and recanalization (P = .655) after EVT did not differ between patients under and those who were not under anticoagulants, although patients under anticoagulants were less likely to achieve good functional outcome (P < .001) than those who were not. Moreover, prior NOAC therapy was not significantly associated with increasing sICH in patients with AIS after IVT (RR = .79, 95% CI = .41-1.53, P = .492).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients under anticoagulation appear to be safe after EVT with relatively lower rate of good outcome; furthermore, prior NOAC therapy was not associated with an increasing sICH rate after IVT. This offered a practical information to select appropriate therapeutic strategies for patients under anticoagulation, although the level of evidence seems to be quite shaky.

Safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke of anticoagulated patients

Background

Anticoagulated patients (APs) are currently excluded from acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapy with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA); however, these patients could benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Evidence for MT in this condition remains scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of MT in APs.

Methods

We analyzed three patient groups from two prospective registries: APs with MT (AP-MT group), non-anticoagulated patients treated with MT (NAP-MT group), and non-anticoagulated patients treated with IV-rtPA and MT (NAP-IVTMT group). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate treatment efficacy with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 and safety (radiologic intracranial hemorrhage (rICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and death rate at 3 months) between groups.

Results

333 patients were included in the study, with 44 (12%) in the AP-MT group, 105 (31%) in the NAP-MT group, and 188 (57%) in the NAP-IVTMT group. Univariate analysis showed that the AP-MT group was older (P<0.001), more often had atrial fibrillation (P<0001), and had a higher ASPECTS (P<0.006 and P<0.002) compared with the NAP-MT group and NAP-IVTMT groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the AP-MT group had a lower risk of rICH (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.01 to 7.61, P=0.05) but a higher risk of death at 3 months (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.76, P=0.01) compared with the NAP-IVTMT group. No difference was found between the AP-MT and NAP-MT groups.

Conclusions

With regard to intracranial bleeding and functional outcome at 3 months, MT in APs seems as safe and efficient as in NAPs. However, there is a higher risk of death at 3 months in the AP-MT group compared with the NAP-IVTMT group.

Challenges in the Anesthetic and Intensive Care Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a devastating condition with high morbidity and mortality. In the past 2 decades, the treatment of AIS has been revolutionized by the introduction of several interventions supported by class I evidence-care on a stroke unit, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, aspirin commenced within 48 hours of stroke onset, and decompressive craniectomy for supratentorial malignant hemispheric cerebral infarction. There is new class I evidence also demonstrating benefits of endovascular therapy on functional outcomes in those with anterior circulation stroke. In addition, the importance of the careful management of key systemic physiological variables, including oxygenation, blood pressure, temperature, and serum glucose, has been appreciated. In line with this, the role of anesthesiologists and intensivists in managing AIS has increased. This review highlights the main challenges in the endovascular and intensive care management of AIS that, in part, result from the paucity of research focused on these areas. It also provides guidelines for the management of AIS based upon current evidence, and identifies areas for further research.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Stroke Taking Rivaroxaban Using Drug Specific Plasma Levels: Experience with a Standard Operation Procedure in Clinical Practice

Background and Purpose

Standard operating procedures (SOP) incorporating plasma levels of rivaroxaban might be helpful in selecting patients with acute ischemic stroke taking rivaroxaban suitable for IVthrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT).

Methods

This was a single-center explorative analysis using data from the Novel-Oral-Anticoagulants-in-Stroke-Patients-registry (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02353585) including acute stroke patients taking rivaroxaban (September 2012 to November 2016). The SOP included recommendation, consideration, and avoidance of IVT if rivaroxaban plasma levels were <20 ng/mL, 20‒100 ng/mL, and >100 ng/mL, respectively, measured with a calibrated anti-factor Xa assay. Patients with intracranial artery occlusion were recommended IVT+EVT or EVT alone if plasma levels were ≤100 ng/mL or >100 ng/mL, respectively. We evaluated the frequency of IVT/EVT, door-to-needle-time (DNT), and symptomatic intracranial or major extracranial hemorrhage.

Results

Among 114 acute stroke patients taking rivaroxaban, 68 were otherwise eligible for IVT/EVT of whom 63 had plasma levels measured (median age 81 years, median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 6). Median rivaroxaban plasma level was 96 ng/mL (inter quartile range [IQR] 18‒259 ng/mL) and time since last intake 11 hours (IQR 4.5‒18.5 hours). Twenty-two patients (35%) received IVT/EVT (IVT n=15, IVT+EVT n=3, EVT n=4) based on SOP. Median DNT was 37 (IQR 30‒60) minutes. None of the 31 patients with plasma levels >100 ng/mL received IVT. Among 14 patients with plasma levels ≤100 ng/mL, the main reason to withhold IVT was minor stroke (n=10). No symptomatic intracranial or major extracranial bleeding occurred after treatment.

Conclusions

Determination of rivaroxaban plasma levels enabled IVT or EVT in one-third of patients taking rivaroxaban who would otherwise be ineligible for acute treatment. The absence of major bleeding in our pilot series justifies future studies of this approach.

Low risk of ICH after reperfusion therapy in acute stroke patients treated with direct oral anti-coagulant

BACKGROUND

The safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients treated with DOAC is unclear. We investigated whether recanalization therapy in patients treated with DOAC is safe.

METHODS

A nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the: (1) frequency of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after recanalization therapy in patients treated with DOAC; (2) independent factors related to ICH; (3) relationship between last intake time of DOAC and ICH; and (4) comparison of ICH frequency between patients treated with DOAC, vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and no-anticoagulation (no-ACT) (control).

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen stroke centers returned the questionnaire and 100 patients (56 IVT alone, 29 EVT alone, and 15 both IVT and EVT) on DOAC were registered. The frequency of asymptomatic and symptomatic (≥4-point NIHSS score increase) ICH within 24h in DOAC patients were 18% and 2%, and were not different compared with the VKA and no-ACT groups (p=0.728; and p=0.626). On multivariate analysis, systolic blood pressure (OR, 1.04; p<0.001) and blood glucose (OR, 1.02; p=0.019) were independent factors for ICH. Among the 52 patients with a known last intake time of DOAC, the rate of ICH was higher in patients ≤4h from last intake than those >4h (38% vs. 10%, p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of ICH after reperfusion therapy in patients treated with DOAC should be low. Systolic blood pressure, glucose level, and DOAC intake time appear to be factors for ICH.

Hemorrhagic Transformations after Thrombectomy: Risk Factors and Clinical Relevance

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a major complication of acute ischemic stroke, potentially associated with clinical deterioration. We attempted to identify risk factors and evaluated clinical relevance of minor and major HTs following endovascular thrombectomy (ET) in isolated middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 409 patients with isolated MCA occlusion treated with ET. Patients' and procedural characteristics, severity of HT according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression models with standard retention criteria (p < 0.1) were used to determine risk factors and clinical relevance of HT. Results are shown as adjusted OR (aOR) and respective 95% CIs. Good neurologic short-term outcome was defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <5 at the day of discharge.

RESULTS

Of 299 patients included, hemorrhagic infarction (HI) was detected in 87 patients, while 13 patients developed parenchymal hematoma (PH). Higher age (aOR 0.970, 95% CI 0.947-0.993, p = 0.012), eligibility for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA; aOR 0.512, 95% CI 0.267-0.982, p = 0.044), and complete recanalization (TICI 3, aOR 0.408, 95% CI 0.210-0.789, p = 0.008) were associated with a lower risk of HI. Risk factors for HI included higher admission NIHSS score (aOR 1.080, 95% CI 1.010-1.153, p = 0.024) and higher admission glucose levels (aOR 1.493, 95% CI 1.170-1.904, p = 0.001). Further, female sex tended to be associated with a lower risk of HI (aOR 0.601, 95% CI 0.316-1.143, p = 0.121), while a statistical trend was observable for proximal MCA occlusion (aOR 1.856, 95% CI 0.945-3.646, p = 0.073) and a history of hypertension (aOR 2.176, 95% CI 0.932-5.080, p = 0.072) to increase risk of HI. Longer intervals from symptom onset to first digital subtraction angiography runs (aOR 1.013, 95% CI 1.003-1.022, p = 0.009), lower preinterventional Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (aOR 0.536, 95% CI 0.307-0.936, p = 0.028) and wake-up stroke (aOR 18.540, 95% CI 1.352-254.276, p = 0.029) were associated with PH. Both, PH and HI were independently associated with lower rates of good neurologic outcome (aOR 0.086, 95% CI 0.008-0.902, p = 0.041 and aOR 0.282, 95% CI 0.131-0.606, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Risk of HI following MCA occlusion and subsequent ET is mainly determined by factors influencing infarct severity. Good recanalization results seem to be protective against subsequent HI. Our results support the notion that occurrence of PH after ET is time dependent and risk increases with more extensive early ischemic damage. Both, HI and PH do not seem to be facilitated by bridging therapy with IV rtPA or the use of oral anticoagulants, but were independently associated with more severe neurologic disability. These results support the notion that HI is not a "benign" imaging sign.

Endovascular stroke therapy may be safe in patients with elevated international normalized ratio

Introduction

Endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke is safe and efficient. However, patients receiving oral anticoagulation were excluded in the larger trials.

Objective

To analyze the safety of endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) values.

Methods

Retrospective database review of a tertiary care university hospital for patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Patients with anticoagulation other than vitamin K antagonists were excluded. The primary safety endpoint was defined as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH; ECASS II definition). The efficacy endpoint was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score after 3 months, dichotomized into favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 3–6).

Results

435 patients were included. 90% were treated with stent retriever. 27 (6.2%) patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 and 21 (4.8%) with an INR >1.7. 33 (7.6%) had sICH and 149 patients (34.3%) had a favorable outcome. Patients with an elevated INR did not have an increased risk for sICH or unfavorable outcome in multivariable analysis. The additional use of IV thrombolysis in patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 did not increase the risk of sICH or unfavorable outcome. These results were replicated in a sensitivity analysis introducing an error of the INR of ±5%. They were also confirmed using other sICH definitions (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS), National Institute of neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Heidelberg bleeding classification).

Conclusions

Endovascular therapy in patients with an elevated INR is safe and efficient. Patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 may be treated with combined IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Setting of Anticoagulation

Background and Purpose—

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) plays a major role in atrial fibrillation stroke prevention but represents a contraindication to intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Intra-arterial therapy remains a potential reperfusion strategy in these patients; however, supporting data are scarce.

Methods—

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected consecutive intra-arterial therapies from October 2010 to March 2015 comparing OAC (vitamin-K antagonists and novel oral anticoagulants) versus normal hemostasis versus intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator patients. Primary safety end point is parenchymal hematoma. Secondary safety end point is 90-day mortality. Efficacy end points are successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, 2b-3) and good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2). Logistic regression for predictors of parenchymal hematoma was performed.

Results—

A total of 604 patients were qualified for the study. Baseline and outcomes variables were overall similar for vitamin-K antagonists (n=29) and novel oral anticoagulants (n=17) patients. When compared with normal hemostasis (n=265) and intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (n=297), OAC (n=46) patients were older and had more comorbidities. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of parenchymal hematoma (8% versus 5%; P =0.42), 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (30% versus 40%; P =0.26), and 90-day mortality (32% versus 26%; P =0.46) among OAC and normal hemostasis patients. Similarly, there were no significant differences between OAC and intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator patients in terms of parenchymal hematoma (8% versus 4%; P =0.16), 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (30% versus 43%; P =0.13), and 90-day mortality (32% versus 22%; P =0.18). The use of OAC was not associated with the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions—

Intra-arterial therapy seems to be safe in patients taking OACs; however, our study showed a nonsignificant increase in hemorrhage and mortality with a nonsignificant decrease in good outcomes in comparison with non-OAC patients. Although these nominal differences may have been related to older age and more comorbidities in the OAC group, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings given our limited sample size.

Recanalization Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Background—

We explored the safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in patients with ischemic stroke on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, last intake <48 hours) in comparison with patients (1) taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or (2) without previous anticoagulation (no-OAC).

Methods and Results—

This is a multicenter cohort pilot study. Primary outcome measures were (1) occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in 3 categories: any ICH (ICH any ), symptomatic ICH according to the criteria of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS-II) (sICH ECASS-II ) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) thrombolysis trial (sICH NINDS ); and (2) death (at 3 months). Cohorts were compared by using propensity score matching. Our NOAC cohort comprised 78 patients treated with IVT/IAT and the comparison groups of 441 VKA patients and 8938 no-OAC patients. The median time from last NOAC intake to IVT/IAT was 13 hours (interquartile range, 8–22 hours). In VKA patients, median pre-IVT/IAT international normalized ratio was 1.3 (interquartile range, 1.1–1.6). ICH any was observed in 18.4% NOAC patients versus 26.8% in VKA patients and 17.4% in no-OAC patients. sICH ECASS-II and sICH NINDS occurred in 2.6%/3.9% NOAC patients, in comparison with 6.5%/9.3% of VKA patients and 5.0%/7.2% of no-OAC patients, respectively. At 3 months, 23.0% of NOAC patients in comparison with 26.9% of VKA patients and 13.9% of no-OAC patients had died. Propensity score matching revealed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions—

IVT/IAT in selected patients with ischemic stroke under NOAC treatment has a safety profile similar to both IVT/IAT in patients on subtherapeutic VKA treatment or in those without previous anticoagulation. However, further prospective studies are needed, including the impact of specific coagulation tests.

Safety of intra-arterial treatment in acute ischaemic stroke patients on oral anticoagulants. A cohort study and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An elevated international normalized ratio (INR) of >1.7 is a contraindication for the use of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischaemic stroke. Local intra-arterial therapy (IAT) is considered a safe alternative. The safety and outcome of IAT were investigated in patients with acute ischaemic stroke using oral anticoagulants (OACs).

METHODS

Data were obtained from a large national Dutch database on IAT in acute stroke patients. Patients were categorized according to the INR: >1.7 and ≤1.7. Primary outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), defined as deterioration in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥4 and ICH on brain imaging. Secondary outcomes were clinical outcome at discharge and 3 months. Occurrence of outcomes was compared with risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Further, a systematic review and meta-analysis on sICH risk in acute stroke patients on OACs treated with IAT was performed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty-six patients were included. Eighteen patients had an INR > 1.7 with a median INR of 2.4 (range 1.8-4.1). One patient (6%) in the INR > 1.7 group developed a sICH compared with 53 patients (12%) in the INR ≤ 1.7 group (risk ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.07-3.13). Clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Our meta-analysis showed a first week sICH risk of 8.1% (95% confidence interval 3.9%-17.1%) in stroke patients with elevated INR treated with IAT.

CONCLUSION

The use of OACs, leading to an INR > 1.7, did not seem to increase the risk of an sICH in patients with an acute stroke treated with IAT.

Stroke unit management and revascularisation in acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke affects one in six people throughout their lifetimes and is the most frequent cause of disability in adults. Several recanalization therapies have emerged and the management of patients in stroke units has improved over the last decades.

SUMMARY

This article examines the current treatment options for stroke patients, summarizing the key clinical evidence, as well as listing the complications and practical issues related to each of these main treatment options.

KEY MESSAGES

Recent advances in the treatment of acute stroke include developments in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), intra-arterial treatment and bridging therapies.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Treatment within a stroke unit reduces mortality and disability regardless of age, sex and stroke severity. IVT is widely available and reduces disability when initiated within 4.5 h after the onset of symptoms. The major limitations of IVT are the low recanalization rates and the narrow time frame. Intra-arterial treatment, especially when using newly developed stent-retrievers, achieves very high recanalization rates. It is restricted by its limited availability and by the longer time span required to initiate therapy. Bridging both therapies is a promising approach that combines the advantages of both therapies, but the superiority of this approach remains to be proven. Future strategies to reduce the burden of acute stroke in Europe should focus on immediate access to acute stroke care and dedicated stroke units for all patients.

Republished: Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care expert consensus statement: Anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke

Literature on the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. Anesthetic management during these procedures is still mostly dependent on individual or institutional preferences. Thus, the Society of Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC) created a task force to provide expert consensus recommendations on anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS. The task force conducted a systematic literature review (up to August 2012). Because of the limited number of research articles relating to this subject, the task force solicited opinions from experts in this area. The task force created a draft consensus statement based on the available data. Classes of recommendations and levels of evidence were assigned to articles specifically addressing anesthetic management during endovascular treatment of stroke using the standard American Heart Association evidence rating scheme. The draft consensus statement was reviewed by the Task Force, SNACC Executive Committee and representatives of Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) reaching consensus on the final document. For this consensus statement the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment of AIS was subdivided into 12 topics. Each topic includes a summary of available data followed by recommendations. This consensus statement is intended for use by individuals involved in the care of patients with acute ischemic stroke, such as anesthesiologists, interventional neuroradiologists, neurologists, neurointensivists and neurosurgeons.

Acute stroke management in patients with known or suspected atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important cause of ischemic stroke, especially in older individuals. Strokes attributed to AF are often large and result in a high rate of fatality. The new oral anticoagulants offer advantages over warfarin in terms of dosing, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage, but pose new management questions for physicians treating these patients. The management of acute stroke is not modified by the presence of AF, but is unique with respect to management of anticoagulation in the hyperacute and acute phases. We will review and discuss acute treatment options in anticoagulated patients with ischemic stroke, anticoagulation discontinuation, and timing of initiation with old and new oral anticoagulants, and managing intracranial hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients. We will end by briefly discussing investigations of stroke patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke.

The Use of Hypothermia Therapy in Traumatic Ischemic / Reperfusional Brain Injury: Review of the Literatures

Therapeutic mild hypothermia has been used widely in brain injury. It has evaluated in numerous clinical trials, and there is strong evidence for the use of hypothermia in treating patients with several types of ischemic / reperfusional (I/R) injuries, examples being cardiac arrest and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.In spite of many basic research projects demonstrating effectiveness, therapeutic hypothermia has not been proven effective for the heterogeneous group of traumatic brain injury patients in multicenter clinical trials. In the latest clinical trial, however, researchers were able to demonstrate the significant beneficial effects of hypothermia in one specific group; patients with mass evacuated lesions. This suggested that mild therapeutic hypothermia might be effective for I/R related traumatic brain injury.In this article we have reviewed much of the previous literature concerning the mechanisms of I/R injury to the protective effects of mild therapeutic hypothermia.