Evolution of a US County System for Acute Comprehensive Stroke Care

Network analysis of stroke systems of care in Korea

Background

The landscape of stroke care has shifted from stand-alone hospitals to cooperative networks among hospitals. Despite the importance of these networks, limited information exists on their characteristics and functional attributes.

Methods

We extracted patient-level data on acute stroke care and hospital connectivity by integrating national stroke audit data with reimbursement claims data. We then used this information to transform interhospital transfers into a network framework, where hospitals were designated as nodes and transfers as edges. Using the Louvain algorithm, we grouped densely connected hospitals into distinct stroke care communities. The quality and characteristics in given stroke communities were analysed, and their distinct types were derived using network parameters. The clinical implications of this network model were also explored.

Results

Over 6 months, 19 113 patients with acute ischaemic stroke initially presented to 1009 hospitals, with 3114 (16.3%) transferred to 246 stroke care hospitals. These connected hospitals formed 93 communities, with a median of 9 hospitals treating a median of 201 patients. Derived communities demonstrated a modularity of 0.904 , indicating a strong community structure, highly centralised around one or two hubs. Three distinct types of structures were identified: single-hub (n=60), double-hub (n=22) and hubless systems (n=11). The endovascular treatment rate was highest in double-hub systems, followed by single-hub systems, and was almost zero in hubless systems. The hubless communities were characterised by lower patient volumes, fewer hospitals, no hub hospital and no stroke unit.

Conclusions

This network analysis could quantify the national stroke care system and point out areas where the organisation and functionality of acute stroke care could be improved.

Performance of Thrombectomy-Capable, Comprehensive, and Primary Stroke Centers in Reperfusion Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report From the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND

The thrombectomy-capable stroke center (TSC) is a recently introduced intermediate tier of accreditation for hospitals at which patients with acute ischemic stroke receive care. The comparative quality and clinical outcomes of reperfusion therapies at TSCs, primary stroke centers (PSCs), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) have not been well delineated.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational, cohort study from 2018 to 2020 that included patients with acute ischemic stroke who received endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis reperfusion therapies at CSCs, TSCs, or PSCs. Participants were recruited from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Study end points included timeliness of intravenous thrombolysis and EVT, successful reperfusion, discharge destination, discharge mortality, and functional independence at discharge.

RESULTS

Among 84 903 patients, 48 682 received EVT, of whom 73% were treated at CSCs, 22% at PSCs, and 4% at TSCs. The median annual EVT volume was 76 for CSCs, 55 for TSCs, and 32 for PSCs. Patient differences by center status included higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, longer onset-to-arrival time, and higher transfer-in rates for CSCs, TSCs, and PSCs, respectively. In adjusted analyses, the likelihood of achieving the goal door-to-needle time was higher in CSCs compared with PSCs (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17-1.66]) and in TSCs compared with PSCs (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.08-1.96]). Likewise, the odds of achieving the goal door-to-puncture time were higher in CSCs compared with PSCs (OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.13-2.21]). CSCs and TSCs also demonstrated better clinical efficacy outcomes compared with PSCs. The odds of discharge to home or rehabilitation were higher in CSCs compared with PSCs (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.06-1.31]), whereas the odds of in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice were lower in both CSCs compared with PSCs (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.94]) and TSCs compared with PSCs (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]). There were no significant differences in any of the quality-of-care metrics and clinical outcomes between TSCs and CSCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study representing national US practice, CSCs and TSCs exceeded PSCs in key quality-of-care reperfusion metrics and outcomes, whereas TSCs and CSCs demonstrated a similar performance. With more than one-fifth of all EVT procedures during the study period conducted at PSCs, it may be desirable to explore national initiatives aimed at facilitating the elevation of eligible PSCs to a higher certification status.

Performance of Thrombectomy-Capable, Comprehensive, and Primary Stroke Centers in Reperfusion Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report from the Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry: Stroke Outcomes Per Hospital Certification Status

Background

The thrombectomy-capable stroke center (TSC) is a recently introduced intermediate tier of accreditation for hospitals caring for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The comparative quality and clinical outcomes of reperfusion therapies at TSCs, primary stroke centers (PSCs), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) has not been well delineated.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational, cohort study from 2018-2020 that included patients with AIS who received endovascular (EVT) and/or intravenous (IVT) reperfusion therapies at CSC, TSC, or PSC. Participants were recruited from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Study endpoints included timeliness of IVT and EVT, successful reperfusion, discharge destination, discharge mortality, and functional independence at discharge.

Results

Among 84,903 included patients, 48,682 received EVT, of whom 73% were treated at CSCs, 22% at PSCs, and 4% at TSCs. The median annual EVT volume was 76 for CSCs, 55 for TSCs, and 32 for PSCs. Patient differences by center status included higher NIHSS, longer onset-to-arrival time, and higher transfer-in rates for CSC/TSC/PSC, respectively. In adjusted analyses, the likelihood of achieving the goal door-to-needle time was higher in CSCs compared to PSCs (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.17-1.66) and in TSCs compared to PSCs (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.08-1.96). Similarly, the odds of achieving the goal door-to-puncture time were higher in CSCs compared to PSCs (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13-2.21). CSCs and TSCs also demonstrated better clinical efficacy outcomes compared to PSCs. The odds of discharge to home or rehabilitation were higher in CSCs compared to PSCs (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06-1.31), while the odds of in-hospital mortality/discharge to hospice were lower in both CSCs compared to PSCs (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and TSCs compared to PSCs (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.98). There were no significant differences in any of the quality-of-care metrics and clinical outcomes between TSCs and CSCs.

Conclusions

In this study representing national US practice, CSCs and TSCs exceeded PSCs in key quality-of-care reperfusion metrics and outcomes, whereas TSCs and CSCs demonstrated similar performance. Considering that over one-fifth of all EVT procedures during the study period were conducted at PSCs, it may be desirable to explore national initiatives aimed at facilitating the elevation of eligible PSCs to a higher certification status.

Effect of multidimensional comprehensive intervention on medication compliance, social function and incidence of MACE in patients undergoing PCI

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of multidimensional comprehensive intervention on medication compliance, social function and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who underwent PCI in our hospital were selected and divided into the regular group (n=46, receiving regular nursing intervention) and the comprehensive group (n=52, receiving multidimensional comprehensive nursing intervention) according to the different nursing intervention methods. The medication compliance, social function, quality of life, and incidence of MACE were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The comprehensive group showed significantly higher rates of taking medication on time, taking medication according to the proper amount, taking medication at the recomended times, no increase or decrease in the amount of medication, and taking medication without interruption than the regular group (P < 0.05). The comprehensive group exhibited significantly higher scores of medication compliance than the regular group (P < 0.05). The Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) scores of both groups during intervention for 8 weeks were lower than those before intervention and after intervention for 2 and 4 weeks (P < 0.05). The SDSS scores of intervention for 2, 4, and 8 weeks in the comprehensive group were significantly lower than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). After intervention, the comprehensive group showed significantly higher scores of physiological function, psychological function, cognitive function, emotional function, role function, and total quality of life than the regular group (P < 0.05). The incidence of MACE in the comprehensive group was significantly lower than that in the regular group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of multidimensional comprehensive intervention for patients undergoing PCI can effectively improve patients' medication compliance, social function and quality of life, and reduce the incidence of MACE.

Effect of PDCA-based nursing intervention on activities of daily living, neurological function and self-management in acute cerebral stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study explored and analyzed the effects of PDCA-based nursing intervention on the activities of daily living, neurological function and self-management of patients with acute cerebral stroke.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients with acute cerebral stroke who were hospitalized from March 2018 to March 2020 were enrolled and divided into the observation-group (n = 70) and the control-group (n = 67). The control-group was given routine care, while those subjects in the observation group were provided with nursing intervention under the optimization of PDCA cycling. The activities of daily living (ADL), NIHSS score, self-management ability and life quality were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

ADL scores of the two groups after intervention were much higher than those without intervention (P<0.05), and the observation-group had apparently higher scores than the control-group (P<0.05). After intervention, the NIHSS scores of the two groups were much lower than before intervention (P<0.05), and the score of the observation-group was remarkably lower than the control-group (P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of each dimension of self-management behavior in both groups increased substantially compared to prior-intervention, and the score was higher in observation-group than in control-group (P<0.05). In addition, the two groups had increased scores in each dimension of life quality in post-intervention (P<0.05), and the observation-group had evidently higher scores than the control-group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

PDCA-based nursing intervention can substantially enhance the daily living ability, neurological function, and self-management ability of patients, thus contributing to improve the clinical prognosis of patients and as such is worth popularizing.

CTA Protocols in a Telestroke Network Improve Efficiency for Both Spoke and Hub Hospitals

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Telestroke networks support screening for patients with emergent large-vessel occlusions who are eligible for endovascular thrombectomy. Ideal triage processes within telestroke networks remain uncertain. We characterize the impact of implementing a routine spoke hospital CTA protocol in our integrated telestroke network on transfer and thrombectomy patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A protocol-driven CTA process was introduced at 22 spoke hospitals in November 2017. We retrospectively identified prospectively collected patients who presented to a spoke hospital with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ≥6 between March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017 (pre-CTA), and March 1, 2018 and March 1, 2019 (post-CTA). We describe the demographics, CTA utilization, spoke hospital retention rates, emergent large-vessel occlusion identification, and rates of endovascular thrombectomy.

RESULTS

There were 167 patients pre-CTA and 207 post-CTA. The rate of CTA at spoke hospitals increased from 15% to 70% (P < .001). Despite increased endovascular thrombectomy screening in the extended window, the overall rates of transfer out of spoke hospitals remained similar (56% versus 54%; P = .83). There was a nonsignificant increase in transfers to our hub hospital for endovascular thrombectomy (26% versus 35%; P = .12), but patients transferred >4.5 hours from last known well increased nearly 5-fold (7% versus 34%; P < .001). The rate of endovascular thrombectomy performed on patients transferred for possible endovascular thrombectomy more than doubled (22% versus 47%; P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of CTA at spoke hospitals in our telestroke network was feasible and improved the efficiency of stroke triage. Rates of patients retained at spoke hospitals remained stable despite higher numbers of patients screened. Emergent large-vessel occlusion confirmation at the spoke hospital lead to a more than 2-fold increase in thrombectomy rates among transferred patients at the hub.

Recovery After Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article describes restorative therapies to improve patient outcomes after stroke. These therapies contrast with acute stroke treatments such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and thrombectomy that target clots, aim to salvage threatened brain tissue to limit injury, and have a time window measured in hours. Restorative therapies target the brain, aim to promote plasticity within surviving brain tissue, and have a time window measured in days to weeks or longer.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of drugs are under study. Preclinical studies are providing attractive therapeutic candidates for translation, such as the C-C chemokine receptor 5 inhibitor maraviroc. Some drug studies have used a pragmatic approach, which is premature for the nascent field of neural repair. Substantial data support the utility of activity-dependent therapies, including constraint-induced movement therapy, with recent studies supporting the need for very high doses to generate the best functional gains. While stem cell therapies are at an early stage, mounting preclinical evidence supports the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells; some initial human studies are supportive. Several types of brain stimulation have been examined, and in some cases initial studies are promising.

SUMMARY

Improved insights into stroke recovery and its treatment have the potential to reduce disability in a large segment of stroke survivors.

Routing to Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Korea: Recognition of Need for Process Improvement

BACKGROUND

To track triage, routing, and treatment status regarding access to endovascular treatment (EVT) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) at a national level.

METHODS

From national stroke audit data, potential candidates for EVT arriving within 6 hours with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥ 7 were identified. Acute care hospitals were classified as thrombectomy-capable hospitals (TCHs, ≥ 15 EVT cases/year) or primary stroke hospital (PSH, < 15 cases/year), and patients' initial routes and subsequent inter-hospital transfer were described. Impact of initial routing to TCHs vs. PSHs on EVT and clinical outcomes were analyzed using multilevel generalized mixed effect models.

RESULTS

Out of 14,902 AIS patients, 2,180 (14.6%) were EVT candidates. Eighty-one percent of EVT candidates were transported by ambulance, but only one-third were taken initially to TCHs. Initial routing to TCHs was associated with greater chances of receiving EVT compared to initial routing to PSHs (33.3% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-2.92) and favorable outcome (38.5% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001; aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16-2.00). Inter-hospital transfers to TCHs occurred in 17.4% of those initially routed to a PSH and was associated with the greater chance of EVT compared to remaining at PSHs (34.8% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001), but not with better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of EVT candidates were initially routed to PSHs despite greater chance of receiving EVT and having favorable outcomes if routed to a TCH in Korea. Process improvement is needed to direct appropriate patients to TCHs.

Endovascular Treatment for Stroke in a Single Center in a Developing Country: Permanent Training is the Key

Objective

In Mexico, the systematic implementation of mechanical thrombectomy has been delayed due to several factors, such as the conditions of the healthcare system. The objective of this report is to explain the experience in our center going through these circumstances, how we have overcome them, our results, and our pending challenges.

Methods

This is a single-center, independent, and retrospective study of prospectively collected data destined to record consecutive patients treated with endovascular techniques at a Mexican hospital that implemented a mechanical thrombectomy program for large vessel occlusion (LVO). Patient selection began in February 2017 and ended in January 2020. Patients selected were between the ages of 18 and 80, and could be treated within 8 hours after onset of symptoms. The timeline of the analysis was divided in half (i.e., 18 months). We prognosticate that our concept of permanent training could have an impact on clinical outcomes.

Results

In all, 73 patients gathered, of which 60.3% were women and 39.7% were men, with an average patient age of 62 years old. The average Onset-Door time was 248 minutes, and mean Door-Recanalization time was 91.7 minutes, where 29.6% (27.2 min) were used in the endovascular procedure per se. The results obtained were as follows: five (6%) patients with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) <2B and nine patients (12.3%) with a TICI 2B. TICI 2C and 3 were considered optimal results and found in 59 (80.8%) patients. It was found that 17 (23%) patients treated in the first 18 months had favorable outcomes (modified Ranking Scale [mRS] <3), and in the last 18 months, 45 (33%) patients had favorable outcomes (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Developing countries such as Mexico usually present particular conditions that are not part of the algorithms generated in developed countries. Nevertheless, with logistic adaptation, creativity, and above all, permanent training, similar results to those in other parts of the world can be achieved.

Three easily-implementable changes reduce median door-to-needle time for intravenous thrombolysis by 23 minutes

Background

The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke is time dependent. Despite great effort, the median door-to-needle time (DNT) was 60 min at the United States stroke centers. We investigated the effect of a simple quality improvement initiative on DNT for IVT.

Methods

This is a single-center study of patients treated with IVT between 2013 and 2017. A simple quality improvement initiative was implemented in January 2015 to allow the Stroke team to manage hypertension in the emergency room, to make decision for IVT before getting blood test results unless patients were taking oral anticoagulants, and to give IVT in the CT suite. Baseline characteristics, DNT and outcomes at hospital discharge were compared between pre- and post-intervention groups.

Results

Ninety and 136 patients were treated with IVT in pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. The rate of IVT was significantly higher in the post-intervention group (20% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.007). The median DNT with interquartile range (IQR) was reduced significantly by 23 min (63[53–81] vs. 40[29–53], p < 0.001) with more patients in the post-intervention group receiving IVT within 60 min (81.6% vs. 46.7%) and 45 min (64.0% vs.17.8%). There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rate (1.5% vs. 1.1%), modified Rankin Scale 0–1 (29.4% vs. 23.3%), and hospital mortality (7.4% vs. 6.7%) between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Three easily-implementable quality improvement initiative increases IVT rate and reduces DNT significantly without increasing the rate of IVT-related complications in our comprehensive stroke center.

Electroencephalography Measures are Useful for Identifying Large Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of stroke optimizes reperfusion therapies, but behavioral measures have incomplete accuracy. Electroencephalogram (EEG) has high sensitivity for immediately detecting brain ischemia. This pilot study aimed to evaluate feasibility and utility of EEG for identifying patients with a large acute ischemic stroke during Emergency Department (ED) evaluation, as these data might be useful in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

A 3-minute resting EEG was recorded using a dense-array (256-lead) system in patients with suspected acute stroke arriving at the ED of a US Comprehensive Stroke Center.

RESULTS

An EEG was recorded in 24 subjects, 14 with acute cerebral ischemia (including 5 with large acute ischemic stroke) and 10 without acute cerebral ischemia. Median time from stroke onset to EEG was 6.6 hours; and from ED arrival to EEG, 1.9 hours. Delta band power (P = .004) and the alpha/delta frequency band ratio (P = .0006) each significantly distinguished patients with large acute ischemic stroke (n = 5) from all other patients with suspected stroke (n = 19), with the best diagnostic utility coming from contralesional hemisphere signals. Larger infarct volume correlated with higher EEG power in the alpha/delta frequency band ratio within both the ipsilesional (r = -0.64, P = .013) and the contralesional (r = -0.78, P = .001) hemispheres.

CONCLUSIONS

Within hours of stroke onset, EEG measures (1) identify patients with large acute ischemic stroke and (2) correlate with infarct volume. These results suggest that EEG measures of brain function may be useful to improve diagnosis of large acute ischemic stroke in the ED, findings that might be useful to pre-hospital applications.