Low-Dose Tirofiban Treatment Improves Neurological Deterioration Outcome After Intravenous Thrombolysis

Clinical and Prognostic Characteristics of Acute BAD-Related Stroke: A Multicenter MRI-Based Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke has emerged as a meaningful subtype of ischemic stroke yet remained understudied. We aimed to investigate the demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of BAD-related stroke.

METHODS

The BAD-study was a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in 20 Chinese hospitals from June 2021 to June 2023, enrolling patients aged 18 to 80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 hours of onset. Eligible single subcortical infarct in the territory of lenticulostriate artery and paramedian pontine artery was included. Clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected at baseline. The primary outcome was a proportion of good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at 90 days. Main secondary outcomes included early neurological deterioration (END), cerebrovascular event, major bleeding, and excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) during 90-day follow-up.

RESULTS

We finally enrolled 476 patients, with a median age of 60 (interquartile range, 53-68) years, and 70.2% were male. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-6) at enrollment. Involvement of the lenticulostriate artery was more common than the paramedian pontine artery (60.7% versus 39.3%). END occurred in 14.7% of patients, with a median time from onset of 38 (interquartile range, 22-62) hours. The rates of good and excellent outcomes were 86.5% and 72%, respectively. Its 90-day stroke recurrence rate was 1.9%. Acute-phase therapy (from onset to 7 days of enrollment) showed heterogeneity and was not associated with prognosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 at admission and END as negative predictors and extracranial artery stenosis as a positive predictor of good outcomes. Age ≥60 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥4 at admission, and END were negative predictors of excellent outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

With distinct demographic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics, along with a high incidence of END and a low risk of stroke recurrence, BAD-related stroke could be categorized as a separate disease entity. Moreover, its acute-phase treatment strategies were undetermined, awaiting further high-quality studies.

Cangrelor for emergent carotid stenting during stroke thrombectomy: a comparative analysis versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural antiplatelet treatment is a key determinant for the risk-benefit balance of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) during stroke endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy profile of cangrelor compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry, a prospective nationwide observational registry of stroke EVT in France. Included patients were treated with eCAS for anterior circulation tandem lesions between January 2015 and June 2023 and received periprocedural treatment with cangrelor, GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 90 days, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes included intracranial recanalization, hemorrhagic transformation and carotid stent patency at day 1.

RESULTS

Of the 1687 patients treated, 384 met the inclusion criteria: 91 received cangrelor, 77 received GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and 216 aspirin monotherapy. Cangrelor was associated with a negative shift in the distribution of mRS scores compared with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.94, P=0.033). Compared with aspirin, cangrelor improved carotid stent patency at day 1 (aOR 4.00, 95% CI 1.19 to 14.29, P=0.025) but showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes. There were no differences in outcomes between full dose and low dose cangrelor. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors demonstrated higher odds of functional independence (aOR 2.56, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.25, P=0.033) compared with aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry-based study indicates a potential trend towards lower odds of favorable clinical outcomes with cangrelor treatment compared with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to potential selection bias and warrant further research for validation.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in ischemic stroke patients without endovascular therapy: A meta-analysis

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have been employed in selective patients after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), yet application in patients without EVT is debated. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies on AIS patients without EVT assessed the effectiveness and safety of platelet GP IIb/IIIa antagonists compared with traditional antiplatelet or thrombolysis therapy. Articles were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The risk of bias and certainty level of evidence were assessed. Fifteen studies were included. GP IIb/IIIa antagonists increased the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 (odd ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.81, p = 0.03), mRS 0-2 (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.46, p = 0.0004), and Barthel Index (BI) 95-100 (OR 1.25, p = 0.005); decreased the proportion of stroke progression within 5 days (OR 0.66, p = 0.006); and lowered the mean mRS score at 90 days (mean difference [MD] -0.43, p = 0.002) and the National Institute of Health stroke scale score at 7 days (MD -1.64, p < 0.00001) compared with conventional treatment. Proportions of stroke recurrence within 90 days (OR 1.20, p = 0.60), any intracranial hemorrhage (aICH) (OR 1.20, p = 0.12), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.91, p = 0.88), and death (OR 0.87, p = 0.25) had no statistical difference between both groups. This meta-analysis finds that compared with traditional antiplatelet or thrombolysis therapy, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists administered within 24-96 h of ischemic stroke onset significantly improve functional prognosis of patients with AIS not receiving EVT, as indicated by mRS and BI at 90 days, and do not increase the incidence of aICH, sICH, and death.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute branch atheromatous disease-related stroke (BRANT): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke is increasingly becoming a clinical entity and prone to early neurological deterioration (END) and poor prognosis. There are no effective regimens to reduce the disability caused by BAD-related stroke in acute phase. Recent studies have indicated the efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischaemic stroke; however, its efficacy has not been validated in patients with BAD-related stroke. Thus, we aim to test whether intravenous tirofiban initiated within 48 hours after the onset would improve the functional outcome in patients with acute BAD-related stroke, in comparison with the standard antiplatelet therapy based on the current guideline.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

BRANT is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel-controlled, phase III trial conducted in 21 hospitals in China. Participants aged 18-75 years with acute BAD-related stroke within 48 hours after the stroke onset are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the tirofiban or control group. The treatment period is 48 hours in both groups. The primary outcome is the excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale Score: 0-1) at 90 days. The secondary outcomes include END, major bleeding, stroke, death, functional status, serious adverse events and change in bleeding-related markers. Assuming the rates of the primary outcome to be 74% in the tirofiban group and 62% in the control group, a total of 516 participants are needed for 0.8 power (two-sided 0.05 alpha).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

BRANT study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (I-23PJ1242). Written informed consent is required for all the patients before enrolment. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037889).

Effects of Tirofiban on Neurological Deterioration in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Evidence supports using antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, neurological deterioration remains common under the currently recommended antiplatelet regimen, leading to poor clinical outcomes.

Objective

To determine whether intravenous tirofiban administered within 24 hours of stroke onset prevents early neurological deterioration in patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke compared with oral aspirin.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial with blinded end-point assessment was conducted at 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China between September 2020 and March 2023. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years with acute noncardioembolic stroke within 24 hours of onset and had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 4 to 20.

Intervention

Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive intravenous tirofiban or oral aspirin for 72 hours using a central, web-based, computer-generated randomization schedule; all patients then received oral aspirin.

Main Outcome

The primary efficacy outcome was early neurological deterioration (increase in NIHSS score ≥4 points) within 72 hours after randomization. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 72 hours after randomization.

Results

A total of 425 patients were included in the intravenous tirofiban (n = 213) or oral aspirin (n = 212) groups. Median (IQR) age was 64.0 years (56.0-71.0); 124 patients (29.2%) were female, and 301 (70.8%) were male. Early neurological deterioration occurred in 9 patients (4.2%) in the tirofiban group and 28 patients (13.2%) in the aspirin group (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.65; P = .002). No patients in the tirofiban group experienced intracerebral hemorrhage. At 90-day follow-up, 3 patients (1.3%) in the tirofiban group and 3 (1.5%) in the aspirin group died (adjusted RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.27-8.54; P = .63), and the median (IQR) modified Rankin scale scores were 1.0 (0-1.25) and 1.0 (0-2), respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.90-1.83; P = .17).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with noncardioembolic stroke who were seen within 24 hours of symptom onset, tirofiban decreased the risk of early neurological deterioration but did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or systematic bleeding.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04491695.

Early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (ADVENT): Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of patients with acute ischemic stroke who undergo intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) fail to achieve excellent functional outcomes. Early administration of tirofiban after IVT may improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early tirofiban administration after intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The ADVENT trial is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. A total of 1084 patients undergoing IVT without subsequent endovascular treatment will be recruited from multiple hospitals in China. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tirofiban or placebo, which will be infused within 6 h after IVT until 24 h after IVT, at 0.4 μg/kg/min for 30 min and then at 0.1 μg/kg/min. The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ⩽ 1) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with favorable functional outcomes (mRS ⩽ 2) at 90 days and neurological functional assessments evaluated during hospitalization. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage will be the primary safety outcome. Mortality and other adverse events will be recorded.

DISCUSSION

This pivotal trial will provide important data on the early administration of antiplatelet therapy after IVT and may promote progress in treatment standards.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06045156).

Predictive value of serum MDA and 4-HNE levels on the occurrence of early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the predictive value of serum MDA and 4-HNE levels on early neurological deterioration (END) after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.

METHODS

This study analyzed 287 AIS patients with standard-dose rt-PA IVT. Clinical baseline and pathological data were recorded before rt-PA IVT, and neurologic deficit was assessed by NIHSS. AIS patients were classified into Non-END and END groups. Serum MDA and 4-HNE levels were determined by ELISA and their correlations with NIHSS scores were evaluated. AIS patients were allocated into groups with high and low MDA or 4-HNE expression, and post-IVT END incidence was compared. Independent risk indexes for post-IVT END and the predictive value of serum MDA+4-HNE levels on post-IVT END were assessed.

RESULTS

Serum MDA and 4-HNE were higher in AIS patients with post-IVT END. NIHSS score showed a positive correlation with serum MDA and 4-HNE levels. MDA levels were positively correlated with 4-HNE levels in AIS patients. END after IVT was increased in AIS patients with high MDA/4-HNE expression. FBG, lymphocyte percentage, PLR, NIHSS score, serum MDA, and 4-HNE levels were independent risk factors for END after IVT. The diagnostic efficacy of MDA+4-HNE in assessing post-IVT END in AIS patients (sensitivity 92.00 %, specificity 82.70 %) was higher than MDA or 4-HNE alone.

CONCLUSION

Serum MDA and 4-HNE levels were higher in AIS patients with post-IVT END than in those with non-END, and MDA+4-HNE possessed a higher predictive value for post-IVT END in AIS patients.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in preventing neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke (TREND): Protocol for an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, masked endpoint trial

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy prevents adverse ischemic events following acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Intravenous tirofiban provides desirable antiplatelet effects, especially in patients who are vulnerable to neurological deterioration (ND).

AIM

The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that intravenous administration of tirofiban, initiated within 24 h of ictus and continued for consecutive 72 h, would be more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of ND within 72 h of enrollment among patients with potentially atherothrombotic ischemic stroke.

METHODS

The Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban in Preventing Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREND) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, masked endpoint study. Its eligibility criteria included AIS secondary to potential atherosclerosis, a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ranging from 4 to 20 points, ineligibility for recanalization therapy, and administration within 24 h postsymptom onset. Randomization was performed at a 1:1 ratio to allocate 420 patients into two groups to receive an intravenous tirofiban bridge to oral antiplatelet drugs or direct oral antiplatelet drugs.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score within 72 h of intervention compared to the score at enrollment. The key secondary outcomes include changes in NIHSS score, modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days, and dichotomized mRS scores (0-2 vs. 3-6 and 0-1 vs. 2-6) at 90 days. The safety variables are symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any intracerebral hemorrhage, and systemic hemorrhage within 72 h after randomization and 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The TREND trial may identify the suitability of intravenous tirofiban as a routine clinical strategy to prevent ND in patients with AIS within 24 h of the onset of symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT04491695).

Cost-effectiveness of tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion: A Markov modelling analysis from the Chinese and United States perspectives

BACKGROUND

The RESCUE BT2 trial recently showcased the efficacy of tirofiban in treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion. To further assess the value of tirofiban from the perspectives of Chinese and US healthcare system, a study was conducted to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A hybrid model, integrating a short-term decision tree with a long-term Markov model, was developed to assess cost-effectiveness between tirofiban and aspirin for stroke patients without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion. Efficacy data for tirofiban was sourced from the RESCUE BT2 trial, while cost information was derived from published papers. Outcomes measured included respective cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We conducted a one-way sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the results. Additionally, we performed probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) through 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the uncertainties associated with the results.

RESULTS

The study revealed that tirofiban treatment in AIS patients without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion led to a considerable reduction of 2141 Chinese Yuan (CNY) in total cost, along with a lifetime gain of 0.14 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the US settings, tirofiban also exhibited a lower cost ($197,055 versus $201,984) and higher effectiveness (4.15 QALYs versus 4.06 QALYs) compared to aspirin. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that post-stroke care costs and stroke utility had the greatest impact on ICER fluctuation in both Chinese and US settings. However, these variations did not exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold. PSA demonstrated tirofiban's superior acceptability over aspirin in over 95% of potential scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Tirofiban treatment for AIS without large or medium-sized vessel occlusion appeared dominant compared to aspirin in both China and the US.

Subtyping treatment response of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke based on neuroimaging features

In a previously published clinical trial, we demonstrated that tirofiban was effective and safe in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who did not undergo early recanalization treatments. We aimed to evaluate neuroimaging characteristics and their clinical significance to guide tirofiban treatment. In this post hoc analysis, location of infarcts (anterior circulation stroke [ACS] vs. posterior circulation stroke [PCS]), degree of cerebral artery stenosis (≤69% vs. ≥70% or occlusion), total infarct volume, and ASPECTS were used to predict the treatment effects of tirofiban, defined as the proportions of excellent and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-1, 0-2) at 90 days. ACS patients were more likely to achieve excellent (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.25-3.45; p = 0.004) and favorable functional outcome (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.24-4.22; p = 0.008) when treated with tirofiban. However, there was no significant difference in PCS patients between tirofiban and the control group. For patients with severe stenosis (≥70% or occlusion), tirofiban treatment improved the proportion of good outcomes (OR 2.84; 95% CI 1.44-5.60; p = 0.002 for mRS 0-1; OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.22-4.77; p = 0.011 for mRS 0-2). Meanwhile, we found that tirofiban improved outcome in patients with ASPECTS 8-10 and was independent of total infarct volume. These findings support the hypothesis that patients with ACS and severe stenosis may be recommended for tirofiban treatment, which can be predicted independent of total infarct volume.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in the management of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

About 30 % of stroke patients have experienced unsuccessful reperfusion following endovascular therapy. Mechanical thrombectomy instruments may contribute to this by stimulating platelet aggregation. Tirofiban is a selective and rapidly activated antagonist of the platelets nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors that can reversibly suppress platelet aggregation. But, data from the medical literature are conflicting regarding its safety and efficacy for stroke patients. Hence, this study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in stroke patients.

METHODS

Five major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library) were searched till December 2022. The Cochrane tool was used for risk of bias assessment, and the RevMan 5.4 was utilized for data analysis.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 2088 stroke patients were included. Tirofiban significantly increased the number of patients with mRS 0 score after 90 days than control; RR= 1.39, 95 %CI [1.15, 1.69]; p = 0.0006. Additionally, it reduced the NIHSS score after seven days; MD= -0.60, 95 %CI [-1.14, -0.06]; p = 0.03. However, tirofiban increased the incidence of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH); RR= 1.22, 95 %CI [1.03, 1.44]; p = 0.02. Other assessed outcomes showed insignificant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban was associated with a higher mRS 0 score after three months and a lower NIHSS score after seven days. However, it is associated with higher ICH. Multicentric trials are required to provide more convincing proof of its utility.

Tirofiban for Stroke without Large or Medium-Sized Vessel Occlusion

BACKGROUND

The effects of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke but who have no evidence of complete occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels have not been extensively studied.

METHODS

In a multicenter trial in China, we enrolled patients with ischemic stroke without occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels and with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or more and at least one moderately to severely weak limb. Eligible patients had any of four clinical presentations: ineligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy and within 24 hours after the patient was last known to be well; progression of stroke symptoms 24 to 96 hours after onset; early neurologic deterioration after thrombolysis; or thrombolysis with no improvement at 4 to 24 hours. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous tirofiban (plus oral placebo) or oral aspirin (100 mg per day, plus intravenous placebo) for 2 days; all patients then received oral aspirin until day 90. The primary efficacy end point was an excellent outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. Secondary end points included functional independence at 90 days and a quality-of-life score. The primary safety end points were death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

A total of 606 patients were assigned to the tirofiban group and 571 to the aspirin group. Most patients had small infarctions that were presumed to be atherosclerotic. The percentage of patients with a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 29.1% with tirofiban and 22.2% with aspirin (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.53, P = 0.02). Results for secondary end points were generally not consistent with the results of the primary analysis. Mortality was similar in the two groups. The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 1.0% in the tirofiban group and 0% in the aspirin group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial involving heterogeneous groups of patients with stroke of recent onset or progression of stroke symptoms and nonoccluded large and medium-sized cerebral vessels, intravenous tirofiban was associated with a greater likelihood of an excellent outcome than low-dose aspirin. Incidences of intracranial hemorrhages were low but slightly higher with tirofiban. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; RESCUE BT2 Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2000029502.).

Analysis of risk factors for the efficacy of tirofiban in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the risk factors for tirofiban efficacy in the early treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

The clinical data of 204 patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with tirofiban were retrospectively analysed. The early efficacy of tirofiban was assessed by a ≥ 4-point decline in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score or via the complete disappearance of neurological deficits at the end of ischemic stroke treatment, and patients were divided into an effective groupand an ineffective group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare the differences in clinical data between the two groups.

RESULTS

 Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that heavy drinking (OR 0.477, 95% CI 0.249-0.899, P = 0.023), elevated total cholesterol (OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.141-0.734, P = 0.008), NIHSS score at initiation of treatment (OR 1.130, 95% CI 1.026-1.253, P = 0.016) and time from onset to treatment (OR 0.839, 95% CI 0.700-0.979, P = 0.038) were independent risk factors affecting the early efficacy of tirofiban.

CONCLUSION

 The early curative effect of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with a heavy drinking history and elevated total cholesterol was poor. In patients with acute ischemic stroke, the higher the NIHSS score was within a certain range (8 < NIHSS ≤15 and the Org 10,172 Trial in the Treatment of Acute Stroke (TOAST) belongs to small-artery occlusion lacunar) at the initiation of treatment and the shorter the time from onset to treatment, the better the early curative effect was.

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration and Risk Classification of Acute Ischemic Stroke

This study aimed to create machine learning models for predicting early neurological deterioration and risk classification in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) before intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The study included 704 AIS patients categorized into END and non-END groups. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to select the best predictors from clinical indicators, leading to the creation of Model 1. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent predictive factors for END from inflammatory cell ratios. These factors were combined with clinical indicators, forming Model 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the models' predictive performance. Key variables for Model 1 included the NIHSS score, systolic blood pressure, and lymphocyte percentage. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-Neutrophil ratio, and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio independently predicted END. Model 1 exhibited moderate predictive ability (AUC 0.721 in training, AUC 0.635 in test). Model 2, which integrated clinical indicators and inflammatory cell ratios, demonstrated strong performance in both training (AUC 0.862) and test (AUC 0.816). Machine learning models, combining clinical indicators and inflammatory cell ratios before IVT, accurately predict END and associated risk in AIS.

Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tirofiban has been used as a rescue when thrombectomy is not successful in endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the use of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with IVT in AIS compared with not receiving tirofiban.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for all relevant studies published up to August 31, 2021. The safety endpoints included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and mortality. The efficacy endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Seven articles (1,036 patients) were included. Of these, 444 patients received tirofiban, and 592 patients did not. Meta-analysis showed that tirofiban did not increase the risk of sICH (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.50-1.93; p = 0.96), any ICH (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63-1.39; p = 0.75) or mortality (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.39-1.15; p = 0.15) and tended to be associated with a favorable functional outcome (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.99-1.78; p = 0.06) in patients with AIS. Subgroup analysis showed that bridging therapy combined with tirofiban could reduce mortality (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.98; p = 0.04). Tirofiban significantly improved the favorable functional outcome in patients with IVT only (non-EVT) (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30-3.02; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous tirofiban could be safe for patients with AIS undergoing IVT, regardless of receiving EVT. Intravenous tirofiban may reduce mortality rates for patients undergoing bridging therapy. It also could increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, especially for patients receiving IVT only.

Study protocol of Branch Atheromatous Disease-related stroke (BAD-study): a multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

As a meaningful subtype of ischemic stroke in Asians, Branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke is associated with high early neurological deterioration (END) and disability, but is understudied and without recommended therapy. The mechanism of END still remains unclear. Branch atheromatous disease-related stroke study (BAD-study) therefore aims to investigate demographic, clinical and radiological features, and prognosis of BAD-related stroke in Chinese patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

BAD-study is a nationwide, multicenter, consecutive, prospective, observational cohort study enrolling patients aged 18-80 years with BAD-related stroke within 72 h after symptom onset. Initial clinical data, laboratory tests, and imaging data are collected via structured case report form, and follow-ups will be performed at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months after enrollment. The primary outcome is the score on modified Rankin Scale at 90-day follow-up with single-blinded assessment. Secondary outcomes include END within 7 days, and National institute of health stroke scale score, Barthel index, cerebrovascular events, major bleeding complications, and all-cause mortality during 90-day follow-up. Characteristics of penetrating and parent artery will be assessed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging combined with other imaging techniques.

DISCUSSION

BAD-study can provide demographic, clinical, radiological, and prognostic characteristics of BAD-related stroke, and thereby potentially figure out the vascular mechanism of early neurological deterioration and optimize therapy strategy with the aid of advanced imaging technique. Baseline data and evidence will also be generated for randomized controlled trials on BAD-related stroke in the future.

Clinical safety and possible efficacy of tirofiban in combination with intravenous thrombolysis by recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for early treatment of capsular warning syndrome (CWS)

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in treating patients with capsular warning syndrome (CWS) who failed to respond to the treatment of intravenous thrombolysis alone. Tirofiban was approved for the treatment of CWS patients with fluctuating symptoms or no substantial improvement after intravenous thrombolysis within 24 h in our hospital from October 2019 to June 2021. Patients were evaluated with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, at 72 h post-thrombolysis, at 1-week, and at 3-months with the modified Rankin Scales (MRS) score. A total of 12 patients received tirofiban and eight patients received control treatment with a history of CWS in our cohort. Among the patients, 13 patients smoked more than one pack of cigarettes a day, 17 had hypertension, 17 had hypercholesterolemia, 7 had diabetes, 1 had the history of cerebral infarction, 2 had atrial fibrillation, 7 had mild big vascular stenosis, 13 had lesions of the perforating branch by imaging, and 19 had acute capsular infarction. In both the tirofiban and control groups, NIHSS scores were significantly reduced after intravenous thrombolysis or 1-week after onset compared with before intravenous thrombolysis (P &lt; 0.001). Before and after intravenous thrombolysis, there were no differences between the tirofiban group and control group (P = 0.970, P = 0.384, respectively). The tirofiban group, however, showed remarkably lower scores in both 1-week NIHSS and 3-month MRS than the control (P = 0.012, P = 0.003, respectively). Our study revealed that tirofiban did not increase the risk of hemorrhage and had favorable clinical efficacy as a remedial treatment for CWS patients with poor prognosis for intravenous thrombolysis, therefore indicating great potential for broader use.

Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

Background

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a standard procedure for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Improving the therapeutic efficacy of IVT is an important task for neurologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early low-dose tirofiban treatment in AIS patients with early neurological deterioration (END) after IVT.

Methods

In this prospective and randomized pilot study, 73 AIS patients with END were recruited from a local hospital in China. Of these, 14 patients were treated with regular antiplatelet agents (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and 59 patients were treated with tirofiban within 24 h of IVT, followed by regular antiplatelet therapy. Neurological deficits and functional recovery were assessed with NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 7 and 90 days. During the 90-day follow-up period, both hemorrhagic (e.g., intracerebral hemorrhage) and non-hemorrhagic (e.g., pneumonia) events were recorded.

Results

Treatment with tirofiban compared with regular antiplatelet therapy: (1) improved functional recovery of AIS patients to mRS (≤2) at both 7 and 90 days (odds ratios [ORs], 1.37 and 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.61 and 1.26–2.12; P = 0.008 and < 0.001, respectively), and (2) reduced NIHSS scores from 11.14 ± 2.38 to 5.95 ± 3.48 at day 7 (P < 0.001) and from 8.14 ± 2.74 to 4.08 ± 3.50 at day 90 (P < 0.001). Tirofiban treatment did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Multivariate regression analysis showed that tirofiban treatment independently predicted a favorable functional outcome (P ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Early treatment with low-dose tirofiban in AIS patients with neurologic deterioration after IVT potentially improved functional recovery and attenuated neurologic deficits as early as 7 days and did not increase the risk of various hemorrhagic complications. However, the therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban treatment in END patients needs to be determined by future randomized clinical trials with a large study population.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/, Identifier ChiCTR2200058513.

Branch atheromatous disease and treatment

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a subtype of ischemic stroke caused by perforating arteries occlusion due to proximal atherosclerosis of the arteries. Early neurological deterioration and recurrent stereotyped transient ischemic attacks are typical clinical manifestations of BAD. The optimal treatment for BAD has not been determined. This article explores a possible mechanism of BAD and effective treatment measures to prevent early progression and attack of transient ischemic events. This article explains the current status of intravenous thrombolysis, tirofiban, and argatroban for BAD and subsequent prognosis.

Early tirofiban administration for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of tirofiban administered in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with or without mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between 2001 and 2021 that provided outcomes of AIS patients who underwent IVT alone or IVT bridging with or without tirofiban. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the rates of (1) an excellent outcome defined as a mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, (2) any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (4) mortality, and (5) successful recanalization.

RESULTS

We included 722 patients with IVT bridging therapy in 3 trials; there were 171 patients in the tirofiban group and 551 patients in the nontirofiban group. We included 846 patients with IVT alone in 7 studies; there were 471 patients in the tirofiban group and 375 patients in the nontirofiban group. The patients treated with tirofiban had a reduced risk of mortality compared to the patients treated without tirofiban during IVT bridging (OR, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.24-0.89; p = 0.02), but no significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, ICH, recanalization or efficacy outcomes on modified Rankin scale 0-2 (p > 0.05). Pooled results showed that tirofiban combined with IVT alone did not increase the risks of sICH, ICH or mortality but was significantly associated with excellent (OR, 2.68; 95 % CI, 1.58-4.55; P = 0.0003) and favorable (OR, 2.36; 95 % CI, 1.58-3.52; p < 0.0001) functional outcomes at 90 days.

CONCLUSION

In AIS patients who underwent IVT or bridging therapy, early administration of tirofiban may be effective and safe, but further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy.

RESCUE BT 2, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke: study rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Tirofiban is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. However, it remains unknown whether it improves outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE

This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of tirofiban compared with aspirin for acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours after symptom onset.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Compared with Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke (RESCUE BT 2) Trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter clinical trial. Up to 1158 eligible patients will be consecutively randomized to receive antiplatelet therapy with tirofiban or aspirin in 1:1 ratio across approximately 100 stroke centers in China.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization. Lead safety endpoints include symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 48 hours and mortality at 90 days. Trial registry number: ChiCTR2000029502 (www.chictr.org.cn).

Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not enough and there is still the possibility of re-occlusion. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of infusing tirofiban after IVT.

METHODS

We performed a prospective controlled study of 60 patients with acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke who were hospitalized in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received tirofiban for 24 h after IVT (rt-PA + T group) and those who did not receive postprocedural intravenous tirofiban (rt-PA group). The rt-PA + T group received low-dose rt-PA (0.6 mg/kg). The rt-PA group received standard dose rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg). The main outcome measure were safety, included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality. The secondary outcome measure is curative efficacy which were evaluated by the 7d-NIHSS score and functional outcomes at 90 days. During hospitalization, the deterioration of neurological function was recorded.

RESULTS

All patients completed the follow-up with complete data, there were 30 patients in each of groups. The general characteristics between the two group patients had no statistically significant differences. Compared with the rt-PA + T group and the rt-PA group, in terms of safety, the rates of the sICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality in both groups were 0, and there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of any ICH between the two groups (10.0% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.306). In terms of efficacy, the rate of the early neurological deterioration events (END) was no statistical significance (0 vs. 6.6%, P = 0.246). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS score between the two groups before the IVT, and also at 24 h, however, the 7d-NIHSS score was lower in the rt-PA + T group compared with the rt-PA group (2.33 ± 1.85 vs. 4.80 ± 4.02, P = 0.004). At 90 days, 83.3% of patients in the rt-PA + T group had favorable functional outcomes compared with 60.0% of patients in the rt-PA group (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rt-PA combined with tirofiban in acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke did not increase the risk of ICH, and mortality, and it was associated with neurological improvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at the ChiCTR and identified as ChiCTR1800014666 (28/01/2018).

Meta-Analysis of Predictive Role of Early Neurological Deterioration after Intravenous Thrombolysis

With the popularization of intravenous thrombolysis, more and more people use intravenous thrombolysis to treat related diseases, but problems also arise. There are still a considerable number of patients with early disease after thrombolytic therapy not only not significantly improving, but also progressing, that is, early neurological deterioration (END). In view of this problem, the prediction of END after intravenous thrombolysis becomes very important. With the development of medical technology, research on the prediction of END after intravenous thrombolysis has gradually been carried out. Effective prediction is of great significance for the prevention and treatment of END after intravenous thrombolysis. This article aimed to carry out a meta-analysis of the predictive role of END after intravenous thrombolysis. Through an informed analysis of all studies of this type in this field, this article determines a method for predicting END after intravenous thrombolysis. The actual effect of its role is revealed in this paper, and its purpose is to promote the development of this field. This article addresses the same type of study on the predictive role of neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis. The article performs test and meta-analysis of its role by conditionally searching for literature studies. It is explained using the relevant theoretical formulas. The analysis results show that the prediction of END after intravenous thrombolysis in this paper can effectively help make a preliminary judgment on the possible later neurological deterioration. Although there is an error between the predicted curve and the actual curve, the difference between the two is between 1% and 5%. It can basically effectively predict the occurrence of END. Therefore, the prediction of END after intravenous thrombolysis has a very large preventive effect on the END after intravenous thrombolysis.

Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban During Intravenous Thrombolysis Bridging to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The safety and efficacy of tirofiban in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is unknown. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in IVT bridging to mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) comparing the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups in AIS intravenous thrombolysis bridging to mechanical thrombectomy (Published by November 20, 2021). Our primary safety endpoints were symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), postoperative re-occlusion, and 3-month mortality; the efficacy endpoints were 3-month favorable functional outcome (MRS ≤ 2) and successful recanalization rate (modified thrombolytic therapy in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b or 3).

Results

A total of 7 studies with 1,176 patients were included in this meta-analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that the difference between the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups in terms of successful recanalization (OR = 1.19, 95% Cl [0.69, 2.03], p = 0.53, I² = 22%) and favorable functional outcome at 3 months (OR = 1.13, 95% Cl [0.81, 1.60], p = 0.47, I² = 17%) in patients with IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy of AIS was not statistically significant. Also, the differences in the incidence of sICH (OR = 0.97, 95% Cl [0.58, 1.62], p = 0.89) and ICH (OR = 0.83, 95% Cl [0.55, 1.24], p = 0.36) between the two groups were not statistically significant. However, the use of tirofiban during IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy reduced the rate of postoperative re-occlusion (OR = 0.36, 95% Cl [0.14, 0.91], p = 0.03) and mortality within 3 months (OR = 0.54, 95% Cl [0.33, 0.87], p = 0.01) in patients.

Conclusion

The use of tirofiban during IVT bridging mechanical thrombectomy for AIS does not increase the risk of sICH and ICH in patients and reduces the risk of postoperative re-occlusion and mortality in patients within 3 months. However, this result needs to be further confirmed by additional large-sample, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trials.

Systematic Review Registration

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022297441.

Human urinary kallidinogenase may improve the prognosis of acute stroke patients with early neurological deterioration

OBJECTIVES

Some acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients still suffer from early neurological deterioration (END) after receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and these patients often have a poor prognosis. The purpose of our study is to observe the efficacy and safety of human urinary kallidinogenase (HUK) treatment in patients with END.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis and 49 patients with END who met the inclusion criteria were divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients received routine treatment of AIS, while patients in the observation group were treated with HUK within 24 h after IVT and the other group without HUK.

RESULTS

There were 24 patients in the observation group and 25 patients in the control group. After treatment, favorable prognosis (mRS scores ≤2) at 3 months in the observation group with 13 cases (54.17%) was significantly better than that in the control group with four cases (16%) (p = .001), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups in any hemorrhagic complication.

CONCLUSION

HUK is considered to be safe and may improve the prognosis of AIS patients with END after IVT. More clinical trials are needed to validate these results in the future.

Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban in Clinical Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy have been approved for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, only a minority of patients received these treatments in China. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with AIS who were not undergoing early recanalization treatments.

METHODS

Patients with mild-to-moderate stroke [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 4-15] were enrolled in this study. Patients due to cardiogenic embolism were excluded. Eligible patients within 12 h from symptom onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tirofiban (a loading dose of 0.4 μg/kg/min over 30 min and a maintenance dose of 0.1 μg/kg/min up to 48 h) followed by regular treatment or to receive regular treatment (aspirin at a dose of 100 mg per day for 90 days) (control). The primary outcome was the proportion of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days [defined as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2]. The secondary outcomes included a shift in the distribution of the mRS scores at 90 days and the NIHSS score at 24 h and 7 days. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 7 days after tirofiban treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 380 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the tirofiban group (n = 190) or the control group (n = 190). The proportion of favorable functional outcomes was higher in the tirofiban group (79.1%) than that in the control group (67.8%) at 90 days [odds ratio (OR), 1.80; 95% CI, 1.12-2.90; p = 0.0155]. An improvement was also observed in the overall distribution of the 90-day mRS scores (adjusted common OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.58-3.39; p < 0.0001). Additionally, the median NIHSS score was lower in the tirofiban group than in the control group at 7 days (3 vs. 5, p < 0.0001). Next, we observed that the occurrence of sICH did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our trial supports that tirofiban was safe and effective and might be a remedial treatment for patients with AIS who did not receive recanalization treatments.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR2000031297.

Efficacy outcomes and safety measures of intravenous tirofiban or eptifibatide for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

To review the literature for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies investigating the safety and efficacy of tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for available papers published up to September 2021. The efficacy was evaluated based on the 3-month favorable outcome [modified Rankin scale (mRS) = 0-1], functional outcome (mRS = 0-2), and the last available National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score measured in each study. Twelve studies (two RCTs and 10 prospective cohorts) and 2926 patients were included. Treatment with tirofiban or eptifibatide had no effects on the favorable outcome (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.89-1.35, P = 0.411), functional outcome (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.28, P = 0.010), and last available NIHSS (WMD = - 2.32, 95% CI - 5.14 to 0.50, P = 0.106), but might increase mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99, P = 0.121). The sensitivity analyses showed that the meta-analyses were robust. There was no significant publication bias. Tirofiban did not increase the risk of ICH (P = 0. 423) and sICH (P = 0. 990) but increased the risk of fatal ICH (RR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.62-7.96, P = 0.002). Thrombolysis/thrombectomy did not influence any of the outcomes. Adding tirofiban or eptifibatide to thrombolysis/thrombectomy was not significantly associated with a favorable outcome (mRS = 0-1) nor functional outcome (mRS = 0-2) in patients with AIS at 3 months, but might be associated with mortality, possibly due to fatal ICH. The NIHSS was also not significantly different between the intervention and control groups after treatments.

Drug Therapeutic-Use Class Prediction and Repurposing Using Graph Convolutional Networks

An important stage in the process of discovering new drugs is when candidate molecules are tested of their efficacy. It is reported that testing drug efficacy empirically costs billions of dollars in the drug discovery pipeline. As a mechanism of expediting this process, researchers have resorted to using computational methods to predict the action of molecules in silico. Here, we present a way of predicting the therapeutic-use class of drugs from chemical structures only using graph convolutional networks. In comparison with existing methods which use fingerprints or images as training samples, our approach has yielded better results in all metrics under consideration. In particular, validation accuracy increased from 83-88% to 86-90% for single label tasks. Similarly, the model achieved an accuracy of over 88% on new test data. Finally, our multi-label classification model made new predictions which indicated that some of the drugs could have other therapeutic uses other than those indicated in the dataset. We performed a literature-based evaluation of these predictions and found evidence that validates them. This renders the model a potential tool to be used in search of drugs that are candidates for repurposing.

Predicting prognosis in patients with stroke treated with intravenous alteplase through the 24-h trajectory of blood pressure changes

Blood pressure (BP) monitored within 24 h from the beginning of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase, is one of the important factors affecting the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to explore longitudinal BP trajectory patterns and determine their association with stroke prognosis after thrombolysis. From November 2018 to September 2019, a total of 391 patients were enrolled consecutively during the study period, and 353 patients were ultimately analyzed. Five systolic (SBP) and four diastolic blood pressure (DBP) trajectory subgroups were identified. The regression analysis showed that when compared with the rapidly moderate stable group, the continuous fluctuation‐very high level SBP group (odds ratio [OR]: 2.743, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.008–7.467) was associated with early neurological deterioration (END). Both the rapid drop‐high level SBP (OR: 0.448, 95% CI: 0.219–0.919) and DBP groups (OR: 0.399, 95% CI: 0.219–0.727) were associated with early neurological improvement (ENI). Moreover, there was a U‐shaped correlation between the OR value of SBP trajectory group and favorable outcome (the modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0–2) at 3 months: the slow drop‐low level SBP group represent a well‐established unfavorable outcome risk factor (OR:5.239, 95% CI: 1.271–21.595), and extremely high SBP—the continuous fluctuation‐very high level SBP group, are equally associated with elevated unfavorable outcome risk (OR:3.797, 95% CI: 1.486–9.697). The continuous fluctuation‐very high level DBP group was statistically significant in mRS (OR: 3.387, CI: 1.185–9.683). The BP trajectory groups show varying clinical features and risk of neurological dysfunction. The findings may help identify potential candidates for clinical BP monitoring, control, and specialized care.

The safety and effectiveness of early anti-platelet therapy after alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For acute ischemic stroke patients, there is a risk of reocclusion after intravenous thrombolysis. In theory, early anti-platelet therapy can reduce the risk of vessel reocclusion. Although current guidelines do not recommend routine anti-platelet therapy within 24 h of intravenous thrombolytic therapy, many studies disagreed with it, especially after the emergence of new anti-platelet drugs. It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis based on high-quality randomized controlled studies to re-evaluate this treatment strategy.

METHODS

Literature retrieval was systematically conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of sicence, clinical trials, CNKI and Wanfang Data, for searching randomized controlled trials (published between January 1, 2000 and April 30, 2020 with no language restrictions) comparing early (within 24 h) with routine (after 24 h) anti-platelet-aggregation therapy after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis. The primary safety endpoint and primary efficacy indicator are the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and a good prognosis at 90-day (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 or return to baseline mRS), respectively. We assessed pooled data by use of a random-effects model.

FINDINGS

Of the 378 identified studies, only 3 were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 1008 participants). Compared with routine treatment, early anti-platelet-aggregation therapy after rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients did not affect the 90-day efficacy (95% CI 0.97 - 1.32). In terms of safety assessment, the early use of anti-platelet-aggregation drugs after thrombolysis has a neutral effect on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and bleeding from other systemic sites.

CONCLUSION

Early anti-platelet therapy after alteplase did not benefit the acute ischemic stroke patients based on the current evidence. However, more clinical trials and statistical evidence are still needed.

Association between tirofiban monotherapy and efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke

Background

Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods

In this prospective non-randomized study, 255 AIS patients were recruited from 4 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2017 and May, 2018. Among them,169 patients were treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel and 86 patients were treated with tirofiban. The primary functional outcome was the distribution of the 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcomes included the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at discharge and mortality at 3 months.

Results

In the propensity score matched cohort, tirofiban alone was noninferior to the dual antiplatelet with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 2.04; P = 0.93). Mortality at 90 days was 10% in the dual antiplatelet group and 8% in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.08 to 7.40, p = 0.81). There was no difference of the ICH rate between two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.48, p = 0.18). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar differences were found for functional and safety outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that tirofiban use appears to be safe as monotherapy in AIS treatment compared with common dual antiplatelet therapy, however, no improvement in functional outcomes was found.

Trial registration

Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2000034443, 05/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Tirofiban Combined With Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Matched-Control Analysis From a Nationwide Registry

Purpose: Tirofiban administration to acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with preceding intravenous thrombolysis remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy in patients with preceding intravenous thrombolysis.

Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and preceding intravenous thrombolysis were derived from “ANGEL-ACT,” a multicenter, prospective registry study. The patients were dichotomized into tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups based on whether tirofiban was administered. Propensity score matching was used to minimize case bias. The primary safety endpoint was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), defined as an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with clinical deterioration as determined by the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. All ICHs and hemorrhage types were recorded. Clinical outcomes included successful recanalization, dramatic clinical improvement, functional independence, and mortality at the 3-month follow-up timepoint. Successful recanalization was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score of 2b or 3. Dramatic clinical improvement at 24 h was defined as a reduction in NIH stroke score of ≥10 points compared with admission, or a score ≤1. Functional independence was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 3-months.

Results: The study included 201 patients, 81 in the tirofiban group and 120 in the non-tirofiban group, and each group included 68 patients after propensity score matching. Of the 201 patients, 52 (25.9%) suffered ICH, 15 (7.5%) suffered sICH, and 18 (9.0%) died within 3-months. The median mRS was 3 (0–4), 99 (49.3%) achieved functional independence. There were no statistically significant differences in safety outcomes, efficacy outcomes on successful recanalization, dramatic clinical improvement, or 3-month mRS between the tirofiban and non-tirofiban groups (all p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained after propensity score matching.

Conclusion: In acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and preceding intravenous thrombolysis, low-dose tirofiban was not associated with increased risk of sICH or ICH. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the effects of tirofiban in patients undergoing bridging therapy.

Biomarkers of Unfavorable Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Successful Recanalization by Endovascular Thrombectomy

<b><i>Background:</i></b> We aimed to identify plasma markers of unfavorable outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after recanalization by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From November 2017 to May 2019, we prospectively collected 61 AIS patients due to anterior large vessel occlusion who achieved recanalization by EVT. Plasma samples were obtained between 18 and 24 h after recanalization. Unfavorable outcomes included futile recanalization at 90 days and overall early complications within 7 days after EVT. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After adjustment for age and initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tenascin-C, thioredoxin, ADAMTS13, and gelsolin were independently associated with both futile recanalization and overall early complications significantly (all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05), while C-reactive protein (CRP) was independently associated with overall early complications (<i>p</i> = 0.031) but at the limit of significance for futile recanalization (<i>p</i> = 0.051). The baseline clinical model (BCM) (including age and initial NIHSS) demonstrated discriminating ability to indicate futile recanalization (area under the curve [AUC] 0.807, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.693–0.921) and overall early complications (AUC 0.749, 95% CI 0.611–0.887). BCM+MMP-9+thioredoxin enhanced discrimination (AUC 0.908, 95% CI 0.839–0.978, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement [NRI] 67.2%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) to indicate futile recanalization. With respect to overall early complications, BCM+MMP-9+tenascin-C, BCM+MMP-9+CRP, BCM+MMP-9+ADAMTS13, BCM+tenascin-C+ADAMTS13, and BCM+CRP+ADAMTS13, all improved discrimination (AUC [95% CI]: 0.868 [0.766–0.970], 0.882 [0.773–0.990], 0.886 [0.788–0.984], 0.880 [0.783–0.977], and 0.863 [0.764–0.962], respectively, all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05 by the DeLong method) and reclassification (NRI 59.1%, 71.8%, 51.1%, 67.4%, and 38.3%, respectively, all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The increased levels of MMP-9, tenascin-C, CRP, thioredoxin, and decreased levels of ADAMTS13 and gelsolin were independent predictors of futile recanalization in AIS patients after recanalization by EVT.

Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant

Objective

To compare the antiplatelet effect and major adverse cerebrovascular events of Pipeline for intracranial aneurysms using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (GPI) eptifibatide and tirofiban.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of relevant data of patients using GPIs combined with oral antiplatelet therapy in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from December 2017 to December 2019. The study was approved by the ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University. According to the random use of GPIs drugs, they were assigned to the eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. Basic data, platelet inhibition rates at baseline, 24h and 72h after administration, short-term major adverse cerebrovascular events, and bleeding complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 47 patients were included in this study, including 24 patients in eptifibatide group and 23 patients in tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in average age (53.75 vs. 53.91 years) and body mass index (BMI) (24.39 vs. 22.73 ​kg/m2) between eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in coagulation factor function (R), fibrinogen function (K), fibrinolysis function (EPL), comprehensive coagulation index (Cl), arachidonic acid pathway inhibition rate (AA%) and adenosine diphosphate inhibition rate (ADP%). However, the baseline level of residual platelet function MA (ADP) in eptifibatide group was significantly higher than that in tirofiban group (50.79 vs. 35.29 ​mm, P ​= ​0.0026). There was a statistical difference in the platelet aggregation function MA (65.38 vs. 62.54 ​mm, p ​= ​0.0442), the rate of spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke (4.3% vs. 0%) and the rate of asymptomatic minor bleeding (26.08% vs. 4.1%) in the two groups (P ​< ​0.05).

Conclusion

Both eptifibatide and tirofiban can effectively inhibit platelets, but the effect of etifeptide is better than that of tirofiban in preventing intracranial microhemorrhage and asymptomatic cerebral infarction.

A novel nomogram to predict early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is a vital cause of mortality and morbidity in China. Many AIS patients develop early neurological deterioration (END). This study aimed to construct a nomogram to predict END in AIS patients.

METHODS

Acute ischaemic stroke patients in Nanjing First Hospital were recruited as the training cohort. Additional patients in Nantong Third People's Hospital were enrolled as the validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to establish the nomogram. Discrimination and calibration performance of the nomogram were tested by concordance index and calibration plots. Decision curve analysis was employed to assess the utility of the nomogram.

RESULTS

In all, 1889 and 818 patients were recruited in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.075; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.059-1.091], diabetes mellitus (OR 1.673; 95% CI 1.181-2.370), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.297; 95% CI 2.005-5.421), previous antiplatelet medication (OR 0.473; 95% CI 0.301-0.744), hyper-sensitive C-reactive protein (OR 1.049; 95% CI 1.036-1.063) and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR 1.071; 95% CI 1.045-1.098) were associated with END and incorporated in the nomogram. The concordance index was 0.826 (95% CI 0.785-0.885) and 0.798 (95% CI 0.749-0.847) in the training and validation cohorts. By decision curve analysis, the model was relevant between thresholds of 0.06 and 0.90 in the training cohort and 0.08 and 0.77 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram composed of hyper-sensitive C-reactive protein, age, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, previous antiplatelet medication and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale may predict the risk of END in AIS patients.

Early administration of tirofiban after urokinase-mediated intravenous thrombolysis reduces early neurological deterioration in patients with branch atheromatous disease

Objectives

To investigate the effects of early administration of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis on early neurological deterioration in patients with branch atheromatous disease.

Methods

We analyzed clinical data from patients with branch atheromatous disease. We enrolled seven cases into the urokinase-only (UO) control group and 10 cases into the urokinase + tirofiban (UT) treatment group. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were obtained at admission and on days 3 and 5 after admission. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were obtained 3 months after admission.

Results

Significant differences between the UO and UT groups were evident on days 3 and 5 after admission. In the UT group, there was a significant difference between NIHSS scores at admission and on day 5, while there were no significant differences in scores in the UO group. The early neurological deterioration rates were not significantly different between the two groups. However, there were significant differences in these rates at 72 and 120 hours. Both the mRS scores and the prognoses at 3 months differed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Early administration of tirofiban after urokinase-mediated intravenous thrombolysis reduces early neurological deterioration and improves the long-term prognosis of patients with branch atheromatous disease.

Safety and Efficacy of Intra-arterial Tirofiban Injection During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Artery Occlusion

Objective:

The safety and effect of intra-arterial (IA) tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during the stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was investigated.

Methods:

From January 2015 to May 2019, a total of 327 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy of large artery occlusions (LAO). Patients were classified into two groups: MT with IA tirofiban (MTT) group and MT only (MTO, without IA tirofiban) group. Clinical outcomes, radiological results, and various complications, such as post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding, and hemorrhagic transformation of infarct were evaluated by comparing the MTT group and MTO group. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent MT with prior intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA).

Results:

The MTT group needed a lower mean number of stent passes and showed a re-occlusion rate as compared with the MTO group (P=0.038 and 0.022, respectively). Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding complications, or hemorrhagic transformation of infarct (P = 0.511, 0.397, 0.429, and 0.355, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, similar findings were observed.

Conclusion:

The use of IA tirofiban during MT seems to be safe and potentially more effective than only MT without IA tirofiban, even in patients who used IV t-PA before MT.