Clinicopathological patterns and survival outcomes of colorectal cancer among young adults in Malaysia: an institutional cohort study

Red Flag Signs and Symptoms for Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as a diagnosis at younger than age 50 years, is increasing, and so-called red flag signs and symptoms among these individuals are often missed, leading to diagnostic delays. Improved recognition of presenting signs and symptoms associated with EOCRC could facilitate more timely diagnosis and impact clinical outcomes.

Objective

To report the frequency of presenting red flag signs and symptoms among individuals with EOCRC, to examine their association with EOCRC risk, and to measure variation in time to diagnosis from sign or symptom presentation.

Data Sources

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through May 2023.

Study Selection

Studies that reported on sign and symptom presentation or time from sign and symptom presentation to diagnosis for patients younger than age 50 years diagnosed with nonhereditary CRC were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently in duplicate for all included studies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to measure risk of bias. Data on frequency of signs and symptoms were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of interest were pooled proportions of signs and symptoms in patients with EOCRC, estimates for association of signs and symptoms with EOCRC risk, and time from sign or symptom presentation to EOCRC diagnosis.

Results

Of the 12 859 unique articles initially retrieved, 81 studies with 24 908 126 patients younger than 50 years were included. The most common presenting signs and symptoms, reported by 78 included studies, were hematochezia (pooled prevalence, 45% [95% CI, 40%-50%]), abdominal pain (pooled prevalence, 40% [95% CI, 35%-45%]), and altered bowel habits (pooled prevalence, 27% [95% CI, 22%-33%]). Hematochezia (estimate range, 5.2-54.0), abdominal pain (estimate range, 1.3-6.0), and anemia (estimate range, 2.1-10.8) were associated with higher EOCRC likelihood. Time from signs and symptoms presentation to EOCRC diagnosis was a mean (range) of 6.4 (1.8-13.7) months (23 studies) and a median (range) of 4 (2.0-8.7) months (16 studies).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with EOCRC, nearly half of individuals presented with hematochezia and abdominal pain and one-quarter with altered bowel habits. Hematochezia was associated with at least 5-fold increased EOCRC risk. Delays in diagnosis of 4 to 6 months were common. These findings highlight the need to identify concerning EOCRC signs and symptoms and complete timely diagnostic workup, particularly for individuals without an alternative diagnosis or sign or symptom resolution.

Epidemiological trends of colorectal cancer cases in young population of Eastern India: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease of the older population in developed countries where the incidence among the young is rising despite the decline in the overall incidence. Contrary to this, in India, which is a low-incidence country for CRCs, the incidence among all age groups including the young is rising. This study aimed at describing the clinico-demographic profile of young CRC cases and the epidemiological trend of the proportion of young cases from 2014 to 2021 in a tertiary cancer center in Eastern India.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at Department of Radiation Oncology, State Cancer Institute, IGIMS Patna, India a prominent tertiary cancer care center of Bihar. All histopathologically confirmed CRC cases in the 0-39 years age group were considered young and evaluated for the clinical, demographic profile as well as yearly trends in proportion out of total CRC cases. Microsoft Excel (2021) was used for statistical analysis. A P value of 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Young colorectal (less than 40 years) patients constituted a third (n = 344, 33.4%) of total colorectal (n = 1028) cases. The median age among the young CRC cases was 30 years (range: 12 to 39 years). Rectum was the most common subsite noted (n = 255,74.1%) among this group of young patients. The most commonly encountered stage of the disease was III (n = 107, 31.1%) and chemotherapy was the most common treatment offered (n = 153, 44.5%). The proportion of young (0-39 years) CRC cases ranged between 29.4 and 37.4 (mean 33.5 ± 2.77, P value = 0.725) over the calendar years of the study period.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of young (<40 years of age) cases out of total CRC cases in our study is higher than that in developed countries. However, the trends of this proportion have been consistent over the study period, i.e., from 2014 to 2021 without any significant change in our hospital-based cancer registry. Rectal cancer affected nearly three out of every four CRC patients in this age group. More advanced disease at presentation emphasizes the need for measures of screening, early diagnosis, and adequate infrastructure for treatment.

Younger patients with colorectal cancer may have better long-term survival after surgery: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between postoperative long-term prognosis and age in colorectal cancer patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study based on a Chinese CRC cohort is to determine the disparity in long-term survival outcomes between younger and older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery using a propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

Data for this study was derived from the CRC cohort of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2007 to September 2022. The long‑term prognoses were compared between younger and older groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2374 CRC patients were evaluated in this study, including 1039 older patients and 1335 younger ones. After 1:1 ratio PSM, each group contained 784 CRC patients. There was no significant difference in baseline information after PSM (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age was an independent predictor of better overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.750, 95% CI = 1.407-2.177) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.369-2.157). In terms of different tumor pathological stages after PSM, in comparison to older group, younger group had better OS in stage II (p < 0.001), stage III (p = 0.0085), and stage IV (p = 0.0014) and better DSS in stage II (p = 0.0035), stage III (p = 0.0081), and stage IV (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger CRC patients have better prognosis than older CRC patients after surgery, especially, and have better OS and DSS in stages II, III, and IV CRC. Younger CRC patient may gain greater benefit from CRC resection and combined therapy. As for the cut-off age, it may be determined by a specific model suitable for local patients.

The Clinicopathological Characteristics of Young-Onset Versus Adult-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Tertiary Hospital-Based Study

Background

The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among young individuals is rising worldwide, especially in Malaysia. Investigations are currently employed to distinguish the features of young-onset CRC (YOCRC) from adult-onset CRC (AOCRC). This study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with YOCRC and AOCRC diagnosed at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of CRC cases from January 2013 to December 2021. The details of YOCRC (< 50 years old) and AOCRC (≥ 50 years old) patients were retrieved from the laboratory system and medical records. The Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression were used to compare the AOCRC and YOCRC cases. Statistical significance was defined at a P-value of ≤ 0.05.

Results

The AOCRC (254/319, 79.6%) was more prevalent than YOCRC (65/319, 20.4%), with a predominance of males (53.9%) and Malay sub-population (90.2%). AOCRC and YOCRC shared similarities in left-sided location, high occurrence of adenocarcinoma with moderately differentiated histology and advanced stage of diagnosis. More patients with YOCRC (23.1%) had a family history of cancer than patients with AOCRC. YOCRC also differed from AOCRC by having more specific histological subtypes, such as mucinous adenocarcinoma (15.4%) and signet ring carcinoma (6.2%). In addition, patients with YOCRC commonly presented with a low density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (60%). Multiple logistic regression showed a family history of CRC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.75, P = 0.003) and histological type (AOR = 15.21, P < 0.001) are more likely to cause YOCRC than diabetes (AOR = 0.06, P < 0.001) and hypertension (AOR = 0.14, P < 0.001) comorbidities, which are associated with AOCRC.

Conclusion

Our descriptive study presented the epidemiological and histopathological characteristics of AOCRC and YOCRC in HUSM, providing current information on distinguishing features between the groups.

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to summarize the prognostic information extracted by the investigators, including overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare patients' long-term prognoses in different age subgroups.

Results

After 694 reports were screened, 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 448,781 CRC cases. In the meta-analysis of the 5-year OS, EOCRC had a better prognosis compared to LOCRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI, 0.78-0.89). No difference in prognosis was found between the two groups in terms of 5-year CSS (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), 5-year DFS (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.09), and short-term OS. In the NMA, patients aged <30 years had the worst outcome (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 15.8%) in 5-year OS; consistent results were observed in the analysis of 5-year CSS (<30 years, SUCRA 4.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Although patients with early-onset CRC had better OS than those with later-onset CRC, there was no difference in the CSS. Meanwhile, the trend for survival was worse in younger patients, especially in those ages 18-29 years. Thus, more attention should be paid to early diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Registration

The systematic review and Meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334697).

The Prediction of Survival Outcome and Prognosis Factor in Association with Comorbidity Status in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Research-Based Study

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is rising exponentially in Asia, representing 11% of cancer worldwide. This study analysed the influence of CRC on patients’ life expectancy (survival and prognosis factors) via clinicopathology data and comorbidity status of CRC patients. Methodology: A retrospective study performed in HUSM using clinical data from the Surgery unit from 2015 to 2020. The demographic and pertinent clinical data were retrieved for preliminary analyses (data cleansing and exploration). Demographics and pathological characteristics were illustrated using descriptive analysis; 5-year survival rates were calculated using Kaplan−Meier methods; potential prognostic variables were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression analysis conducted via the Cox proportional hazards model, while the Charlson Comorbidity Scale was used to categorize patients’ disease status. Results: Of a total of 114 CRC patients, two-thirds (89.5%) were from Malay tribes, while Indian and Chinese had 5.3% each. The 50−69.9 years were the most affected group (45.6%). Overall, 40.4% were smokers (majorly male (95.7%)), 14.0% ex-smokers, and 45.6% non-smokers (p-value = 0.001). The Kaplan−Meier overall 5-year median survival time was 62.5%. From the outcomes, patients who were male and >70 years had metastasis present, who presented with per rectal bleeding and were classified as Duke C; and who has tumour in the rectum had the lowest survival rate. Regarding the prognosis factors investigated, “Gender” (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.62; 95% CI: 1.56−7.81, p-value = 0.040), “Presence of metastases” (HR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.89−7.32, p-value = 0.010), “Metastasis site: Liver” (HR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.71−19.05, p-value = 0.039), “Lymphovascular permeation” (HR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.99−5.92, p-value = 0.021), and “CEA-level” (HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.49−5.80, p-value = 0.001) remained significant in the final model for multiple Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. There was a significant mean association between tumour grades and the patient’s comorbidity status. Conclusions: Histopathological factors (gender, metastases presence, site of metastases, CEA level, and lymphovascular permeation) showed the best prognosis-predicting factors in CRC.

The short-term and oncologic outcomes of younger VS older colorectal cancer patients undergoing primary surgery: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study is to analyze the difference of short-term and oncologic outcomes between younger and older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent primary CRC surgery using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected CRC patients who underwent primary surgery in a single clinical database from Jan 2011 to Jan 2020. The short-term and oncologic outcomes were compared between younger aged group and older aged group.

RESULTS

A total of 4599 patients were included in this study, and there were 4196 patients in older aged group and 403 patients in younger aged group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 401 patients in each group. No significant difference was found in terms of baseline information after PSM (p>0.05). Younger aged group had larger retrieved lymph nodes before (p<0.001) and after PSM (p=0.001) than older aged group. In multivariate analysis, younger age was an independent predictor of better overall survival (OS) (p<0.001, HR=2.303, 95% CI=1.658-3.199) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.008, HR=1.425, 95% CI=1.098-1.850). In terms of different tumor stage after PSM, younger aged group had better OS than older group in stage II (p<0.001) and stage IV (p=0.028) CRC, and younger aged group had better DFS than older group in stage II (p=0.016) CRC.

CONCLUSION

Younger CRC patients had larger retrieved lymph nodes and better prognosis than older CRC patients after primary CRC surgery.