Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea with Adaptive Servoventilation in Chronic Heart Failure

The SERVE-HF safety notice in clinical practice - experiences of a tertiary sleep center

BACKGROUND

In May 2015, the results of the SERVE-HF trial - addressing adaptive servoventilation (ASV) in chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with central sleep apnea (CSA) - prompted a field safety notice. It was recommended to identify CHF patients treated with ASV and to advise the discontinuation of the treatment. We aimed to analyze the identification process and effect of ASV discontinuation on affected patients.

METHODS

126 patients treated with ASV on May 13th, 2015 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment decisions, effect of ASV discontinuation and clinical course were followed for a year. Patients on ASV with CHF were compared to those without CHF.

RESULTS

The risk criteria of the safety notice were fulfilled by 10.3% of patients (13/126). Additional echocardiographies were performed in 38%. ASV was discontinued in 93% of patients without adverse events (emergency hospitalization in n = 1). CSA reappeared immediately. Day- or nighttime symptoms were reported by 61%. Symptomatic patients were started on alternative treatments. CHF and non-CHF patients differed in cardiac function and type of SDB. CHF patients had shorter overall treatment duration. Compliance to ASV was similar in both groups with a median usage of 412 min (269; 495)/night in the CHF group and 414.5 min (347; 480) in the non-CHF group.

CONCLUSION

Identification of patients "at risk" is feasible but outcome of discontinuation of ASV cannot be evaluated based on these data. ASV withdrawal in patients with stable chronic CHF and CSA leads to an immediate return of sleep disordered breathing. Symptomatic patients may ask for alternative treatment options.

Clinical Use of Loop Gain Measures to Determine Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Efficacy in Patients with Complex Sleep Apnea. A Pilot Study

RATIONALE

Measures of unstable ventilatory control (loop gain) can be obtained directly from the periodic breathing duty ratio on polysomnography in patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration/central sleep apnea and can predict the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy.

OBJECTIVES

In this pilot study, we aimed to determine if this measure could also be applied to patients with complex sleep apnea (predominant obstructive sleep apnea, with worsening or emergent central apneas on CPAP). We hypothesized that loop gain was higher in patients whose central events persisted 1 month later despite CPAP treatment versus those whose events resolved over time.

METHODS

We calculated the duty ratio of the periodic central apneas remaining on the CPAP titration (or second half of the split night) while patients were on optimal CPAP with the airway open (obstructive apnea index < 1/h). Loop gain was calculated by the formula: LG = 2π/[(2πDR - sin(2πDR)]. Patients were followed on CPAP for 1 month. Post-treatment apnea-hypopnea index and compliance data were recorded from smart cards.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with complex sleep apnea were identified, and 17 patients had full data sets. Eight patients continued to have a total of more than five events per hour (11.8 ± 0.5/h) (nonresponders). The remaining nine patients had an apnea-hypopnea index less than 5/h (2.2 ± 0.4/h) (responders). Loop gain was higher in the nonresponders versus responders (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.7 ± 0.2, P = 0.026). Loop gain and the residual apnea-hypopnea index 1 month after CPAP were associated (r = 0.48, P = 0.02). CPAP compliance was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, loop gain was higher for patients with complex sleep apnea in whom central apneas persisted after 1 month of CPAP therapy (nonresponders). Loop gain measurement may enable an a priori determination of those who need alternative modes of positive airway pressure.