New perspectives in mental health services in Shanghai

Person-centered care in Chinese residential care facilities: a preliminary measure

OBJECTIVES

Person-centered care (PCC) is one of the most desirable approaches for elderly with dementia. However, it has not been initiated and systematically studied in China, on which lacking of reliable and valid measurement tools is one of the key barriers. This paper aims to validate person-centered care assessment tools (P-CAT) in a Chinese context.

METHOD

The original 13-item was translated and back translated. And 11 items were added based on literature review and expert consultation. The resulting 24-item P-CAT-C was validated among a sample of formal caregivers (n = 330) in all 34 residential care facilities in urban Xi'an, a representative city in north-western China. Chinese versions of staff-based measures of individualized care for institutionalized persons with dementia (IC) and caregiver psychological elder abuse behavior (CPEAB) scale were used to test the criterion validity.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that a three-factor 15-item solution provided adequate fit indices to the data (χ(2) = 145.691, df = 81, p < 0.001, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.926, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.905, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050). Four new items were identified and two original items were excluded. The three factors are named as (1) individualized care (6-item); (2) organizational support (6-item); and (3) environmental accessibility (3-item). The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's α = 0.684) is satisfactory. The interscale correlation among P-CAT-C, IC, and CPEAB showed good criterion validity.

CONCLUSION

P-CAT-C is a culturally adapted version of the original P-CAT, which showed satisfactory reliability and validity for evaluating PCC in Chinese residential care facilities. It also provides insight to other developing countries.

Storytelling of co-operative team meetings in acute psychiatric care

BACKGROUND

One of the goals of co-operative psychiatric nursing and co-operative team meetings is to improve patients' and significant others' participation and thus, to enhance patients' resources outside the hospital. The objective of this paper is to describe the different expert interventions that either enabled or prevented patient and his/her significant others participation in co-operative team meetings in acute psychiatric wards.

METHODS

The data consisted of 11 videotaped team meetings. The participants were voluntary patients, significant others and experts in health and social care. A narrative approach focused on the storytelling of all members in the meetings. The method of modified dialogue analysis was used to identify the ideas of the stories.

FINDINGS

The same topic of discussion was shared in active participation. The experts asked open-ended questions, the patient and his/her significant others' were free to express their viewpoints and the experts' interpretation was based on their stories. The experts presented the reasons for their questions, and the contents of the questions were verbalized. In passive participation, the experts questions were based on their own point of view, and the patient and his significant others merely answered these questions. If the expert opinion appeared too dominating at the co-operative team meeting, the patient's and his/her significant others' participation was in jeopardy.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician either dominates the storytelling or gives space for free expressions of various viewpoints during the co-operative team meetings.