Incidence of Early and Late-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection following Appendectomy Compared to Other Common Abdominal Surgical Procedures

Introduction. Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is a major public health issue. The appendix may function as a reservoir for the intestinal microbiome, which may repopulate the intestine following enteric infections including CDAD. Patients/Methods. This retrospective cohort study includes a total of 12,039 patients undergoing appendectomy, hemicolectomy, and cholecystectomy at a single center between 1992 and 2011 who were diagnosed with early and late-onset CDAD and were followed for a minimum of two years. Results. Cumulative CDAD rates were 2.3% after appendectomy, 6.4% after left and 6.8% after right hemicolectomy, and 4% after cholecystectomy with a median onset of 76 (range 1–6011) days after the procedure. Median time to CDAD onset was 76 days after appendectomy, 23 days after left, 54 days after right hemicolectomy, and 122 days after cholecystectomy ( $p<0.05$ ). Late-onset CDAD (>1 year) was significantly more common following appendectomy (37%) and cholecystectomy (39%) than after left (17%) and right (21%) hemicolectomy. Significant differences in age, gender, complication rate, and length of hospitalization between the four groups need to be considered when interpreting the results. Conclusion. The incidence of CDAD after various abdominal surgeries ranged between 2% and 7% in this study. Whereas, hemicolectomy patients had predominantly early onset CDAD, and appendectomy and cholecystectomy may increase the risk for late-onset CDAD. Appendectomy per se does not seem to increase the risk for late-onset CDAD.

A history of Clostridioides difficile infection portends infection recurrence and worse outcomes after stoma reversal

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection is reported to occur after 2.2% of colorectal operations and is associated with longer length of hospital stay, greater overall healthcare cost, and significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection is greatest after elective stoma reversal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior Clostridioides difficile infection on patients undergoing stoma reversal. We hypothesized that patients with a history of Clostridioides difficile infection who underwent stoma reversal will be at an increased risk of postoperative Clostridioides difficile infection compared with patients without a history of Clostridioides difficile infection.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of patients undergoing elective stoma reversal surgery by colorectal surgeons at a single academic institution during a 10-year period. A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried to identify 454 patients who underwent stoma reversal surgery between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were Clostridioides difficile infection after stoma reversal and time to Clostridioides difficile infection after bowel refunctionalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with Clostridioides difficile infection after stoma reversal.

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients were identified who underwent elective stoma reversal, 42 of whom had a history of Clostridioides difficile infection before the stoma reversal. There were no significant differences in patient age, number of days diverted, or use of perioperative antibiotics between patients with and without a history of Clostridioides difficile infection. The incidence of postreversal Clostridioides difficile infection was 23.4% in patients with a history of Clostridioides difficile infection compared with 9.6% in patients with no Clostridioides difficile infection history (P = .004); however, time to Clostridioides difficile infection after reversal did not differ. History of Clostridioides difficile infection was also associated with greater risk of postoperative complications (26.2% vs 9.4%, P < .01), increased length of stay (3 vs 5 days postoperatively, P < .01), increased likelihood of discharge to a skilled-care facility (11.9% vs 6.2%, P < .01), and readmission (13.7 vs 31.0%, P < .01) within 30 days. In a multivariable logistic regression model, history of Clostridioides difficile infection, increased length of hospital stay, and discharge to a skilled facility were associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection after reversal, while proton pump inhibitors use was associated with decreased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a prior history of Clostridioides difficile infection who underwent stoma reversal exhibited higher rates of postoperative Clostridioides difficile infection and were at greater risk of postoperative complications, discharge to a skilled facility, and 30-day readmission. Furthermore, research into interventions aimed at improving outcomes in this unique, high-risk population is needed.

Clostridium difficile Infection After Ileostomy Reversal

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after ileostomy reversal is rare, with few reports available in the available literature describing this condition. The diagnosis of CDI after ileostomy reversal is challenging because symptoms such as diarrhea observed in these patients can occur frequently after surgery. However, CDI can be fatal, so early diagnosis and prompt treatment are important. We discuss 2 patients with positive C. difficile toxin assay results on stool cultures performed after ileostomy reversal. Clinical progression differed between these patients: one patient who presented with severe CDI and shock was successfully treated following a prolonged intensive care unit stay for the management of vital signs and underwent hemodialysis, while another patient showed symptoms of mild colitis but we could not confirm whether diarrhea was associated with CDI or with the usual postoperative state. To our knowledge, these represent 2 of just a few cases reported in the literature describing CDI after ileostomy reversal.

A systematic review of Clostridium difficile infection following reversal of ileostomy

AIM

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been reported to be as high as 4% following ileostomy reversal. CDI can be associated with significant morbidity. A systematic review on this subject has not been previously reported; our aim was to review the literature to establish incidence and to evaluate the factors that may contribute to an increased risk of CDI following ileostomy reversal.

METHOD

A systematic review of Ovid, Embase and Medline was undertaken. Search terms included C. difficile, reversal of ileostomy and ileostomy closure. Articles were included where at least one case of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea following reversal of defunctioning ileostomy was reported. Data extraction for articles was performed by two authors, using predefined data fields. The primary outcome measure was incidence of CDI amongst patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. Secondary outcomes were defunctioning time, antibiotic regime, acid suppression, time to onset of symptoms and study conclusions including colectomy and mortality rate.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included (five case reports and six cohort studies). The overall incidence of CDI was 1.8% (242/13 728). The mean defunctioning time was 8.7 months (range 6-12). A variety of antibiotic regimes were described. Mean time to onset of symptoms was 6 days (range 3-14). Use of acid suppression, colectomy or mortality rate were frequently not reported.

CONCLUSION

CDI should be recognized as a potentially life-threatening complication of ileostomy closure. Careful consideration should be given to peri-operative antibiotic regime, acid suppression, timing of reversal and appropriate preoperative counselling of patients.