1
|
Davis TA, Gyawali CP. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Diagnosis and Management. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 30:17-28. [PMID: 38173155 PMCID: PMC10774805 DOI: 10.5056/jnm23145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, with increasing worldwide disease prevalence and high economic burden. A significant number of patients will remain symptomatic following an empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Persistent symptoms despite PPI therapy are often mislabeled as refractory GERD. For patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD), testing is performed off antisecretory therapy to identify objective evidence of pathologic reflux using criteria outlined by the Lyon consensus. In proven GERD, differentiation between refractory symptoms (persisting symptoms despite optimized antisecretory therapy) and refractory GERD (abnormal reflux metrics on ambulatory pH impedance monitoring and/or persistent erosive esophagitis on endoscopy while on optimized PPI therapy) can direct subsequent management. While refractory symptoms may arise from esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn, proven refractory GERD requires personalization of the management approach, tapping from an array of non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, endoscopic, and surgical interventions. Proper diagnosis and management of refractory GERD is critical to mitigate undesirable long-term complications such as strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review outlines the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with refractory GERD symptoms, describes the distinction between unproven and proven GERD, and provides a comprehensive review of the current treatment strategies available for the management of refractory GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor A Davis
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valdovinos Díaz MA, Amieva-Balmori M, Carmona-Sánchez R, Coss-Adame E, Gómez-Escudero O, González-Martínez M, Huerta-Iga F, Morel-Cerda E, Remes-Troche JM, Tamayo-de la Cuesta JL, Torres-Villalobos G, Valdovinos-García LR, Vázquez-Elizondo G, Villar-Chávez AS, Arenas-Martínez JA. Good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. An expert review from the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024; 89:121-143. [PMID: 38580493 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very prevalent in the general population, with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, requiring accurate diagnosis and treatment. AIM The aim of this expert review is to establish good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and personalized treatment of GERD. METHODS The good clinical practice recommendations were produced by a group of experts in GERD, members of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (AMG), after carrying out an extensive review of the published literature and discussing each recommendation at a face-to-face meeting. This document does not aim to be a clinical practice guideline with the methodology such a document requires. RESULTS Fifteen experts on GERD formulated 27 good clinical practice recommendations for recognizing the symptoms and complications of GERD, the rational use of diagnostic tests and medical treatment, the identification and management of refractory GERD, the overlap with functional disorders, endoscopic and surgical treatment, and GERD in the pregnant woman, older adult, and the obese patient. CONCLUSIONS An accurate diagnosis of GERD is currently possible, enabling the prescription of a personalized treatment in patients with this condition. The goal of the good clinical practice recommendations by the group of experts from the AMG presented in this document is to aid both the general practitioner and specialist in the process of accurate diagnosis and treatment, in the patient with GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Amieva-Balmori
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Intestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas de la Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - R Carmona-Sánchez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Práctica privada, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | - E Coss-Adame
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - O Gómez-Escudero
- Clínica de Gastroenterología, Endoscopia y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Endoneurogastro, Hospital Ángeles Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - M González-Martínez
- Departamento de Endoscopia, Hospital de Especialidades del CMN Siglo XXI IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - F Huerta-Iga
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ángeles Torreón, Torreón, Mexico
| | - E Morel-Cerda
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - J M Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Intestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas de la Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - J L Tamayo-de la Cuesta
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
| | - G Torres-Villalobos
- Cirugía Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - G Vázquez-Elizondo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas ONCARE, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - A S Villar-Chávez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ángeles Acoxpa, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J A Arenas-Martínez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiappetta S, de Falco N, Lainas P, Kassir R, Valizadeh R, Kermansaravi M. Safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as revisional bariatric surgery after failed anti-reflux surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:1317-1325. [PMID: 37507338 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on weight loss and anti-reflux outcomes when used as a revisional bariatric surgical procedure after failed anti-reflux surgery. A systematic literature search next to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed for articles published by 30 Mar 2022. After examining 416 papers, 23 studies were included (n = 874 patients). Primary anti-reflux surgery included mainly Nissen fundoplication (16 studies). Reasons for revisional surgery included predominantly gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (reported by 18 studies), obesity (reported by 6 studies), and hiatal hernia (reported by 6 studies). Interval to surgical revision was 5.58 ± 2.46 years (range, 1.5-9.4 yr). Upper endoscopy at revision was performed for all patients; esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were reported in 6 and 4 studies, respectively. Mean body mass index (BMI) at revision was 37.56 ± 5.02 kg/m2 (range, 31.4-44 kg/m2). Mean excess weight loss was 69.74% reported by 12 studies. Delta BMI reported by 7 studies was 10.41 kg/m2. The rate of perioperative complications was 16.7%, including mostly stenosis, leakage, ventral hernia, and small bowel obstruction. Mean improvement rate of GERD was 92.62% with a mean follow-up of 25.64 ± 16.59 months reported in 20 studies. RYGB seems to be an efficient surgical treatment option in failed anti-reflux procedures, but should be performed in experienced centers for selected patients, since the rate of perioperative and long-term complications must be minimized. Cooperation between bariatric and reflux surgeons is essential to offer patients with obesity and GERD the best long-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Chiappetta
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy.
| | - Nadia de Falco
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, HEAL Academy, Athens, Greece; Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Béclère Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Clamart, France
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Digestive Surgery Unit, University Hospital of La Réunion -Félix Guyon Hospital, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France; Diabète athérothrombose Thérapies Réunion Océan Indien (DéTROI), INSERM, UMR 1188, Université de La Réunion, Saint Denis, France
| | | | - Mohammad Kermansaravi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ceccarelli G, Valeri M, Amato L, De Rosa M, Rondelli F, Cappuccio M, Gambale FE, Fantozzi M, Sciaudone G, Avella P, Rocca A. Robotic revision surgery after failed Nissen anti-reflux surgery: a single center experience and a literature review. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1517-1524. [PMID: 36862348 PMCID: PMC9979125 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01546-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) worldwide prevalence is increasing maybe due to population aging and the obesity epidemic. Nissen fundoplication is the most common surgical procedure for GERD with a failure rate of approximately 20% which might require a redo surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic redo procedures after anti-reflux surgery failure including a narrative review. METHODS We reviewed our 15-year experience from 2005 to 2020 including 317 procedures, 306 for primary, and 11 for revisional surgery. RESULTS Patients included in the redo series underwent primary Nissen fundoplication with a mean age of 57.6 years (range, 43-71). All procedures were minimally invasive and no conversion to open surgery was registered. The meshes were used in five (45.45%) patients. The mean operative time was 147 min (range, 110-225) and the mean hospital stay was 3.2 days (range, 2-7). At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range, 18-192), one patient suffered for persistent dysphagia and one for delayed gastric emptying. We had two (18.19%) Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa complications, consisting of postoperative pneumothoraxes treated with chest drainage. CONCLUSION Redo anti-reflux surgery is indicated in selected patients and the robotic approach is safe when it is performed in specialized centers, considering its surgical technical difficulty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Manuel Valeri
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lavinia Amato
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Elvira Gambale
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Guido Sciaudone
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhat S, Dubey N, Gan SW, Frampton C, Stranz C, Prasad S, Barazanchi AWH, Kanhere H. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in symptomatic patients following fundoplication failure: a meta-analysis. Esophagus 2023; 20:184-194. [PMID: 36348250 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-022-00969-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Revisional surgery may be required in a subset of patients who remain symptomatic despite undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While revisional LF (RLF) is feasible in these patients, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) may serve as an alternative, although its efficacy and safety remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of LRYGB in symptomatic patients following failed LF for GERD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for studies reporting LRYGB outcomes in symptomatic adults despite undergoing LF for GERD. Postoperative symptom resolution, recurrence of heartburn and dysphagia, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and body mass index (BMI) reduction were assessed to determine LRYGB efficacy. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were used to evaluate LRYGB safety. Twenty-two studies with 1523 patients were included. Pooled rates of symptom resolution, recurrence of heartburn and dysphagia, PPI use, morbidity, and mortality were 71.6% (95% CI 59.4-86.4), 15.6% (8.9-27.3), 20.7% (12.5-34.3), 29.6% (18.8-46.5), 39.5% (29.9-52.3), and 2.2% (1.2-4.0), respectively, following LRYGB. Similar rates were observed after RLF. However, BMI reduction was significantly greater after LRYGB compared with RLF (mean difference 6.1 kg/m2, 4.8-7.4; p < 0.0001). LRYGB resulted in symptom relief in a majority of patients, and proved comparable to RLF regarding symptom recurrence and PPI use. Morbidity and mortality following LRYGB also did not differ from RLF. However, LRYGB was associated with considerably greater weight loss relative to RLF. Therefore, LRYGB is efficacious and an acceptable revisional procedure in symptomatic GERD patients who have previously undergone LF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Bhat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - Nandini Dubey
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - Siang Wei Gan
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | | | - Conrad Stranz
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Shalvin Prasad
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Ahmed W H Barazanchi
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Harsh Kanhere
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Division of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weis JJ, Pryor A, Alseidi A, Tellez J, Goldblatt MI, Mattar S, Murayama K, Awad M, Scott DJ. Defining benchmarks for fellowship training in foregut surgery: a 10-year review of fellowship council index cases. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8856-8862. [PMID: 35641699 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical treatment of foregut disease is a complex field that demands advanced expertise to ensure favorable outcomes for patients. To address the growing need for foregut surgeons, leaders within several national societies have become interested in developing a foregut fellowship. The aim of this study was to develop data-driven benchmarks that will aid in defining appropriate accreditation criteria for these fellowships. METHODS We obtained case log data for Fellowship Council fellows trained from 2009-2019. We identified 78 complex foregut (non-bariatric) case codes and divided them into 5 index case categories including (1) hiatal/paraoesophageal hernia repair, (2) fundoplication, (3) esophageal myotomy, (4) major organ resection, and (5) minor organ resection. Median volumes in each index category were compared over time using Kruskall-Wallis tests. The share of cases done using open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches were analyzed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS For the 10 years analyzed, 1362 fellows logged 82,889 operations and 111,799 endoscopies. Median foregut cases per fellow grew significantly from 42 (IQR = 24-74) cases in 2010 to 69 (IQR = 33-106) cases in 2019. Median endoscopy volumes also grew significantly from 42 (IQR = 7-88) in 2010 to 69 (IQR 32-123) in 2019.The volume of hiatal/paraoesophageal hernia repairs increased significantly over time while volumes in the remaining 4 index categories remained stable. The share of robotic cases exhibited near perfect linear growth from 2.2% of all foregut cases in 2010 to 14.4% in 2019 (R = 0.99, p < 0.0001). Open cases exhibited linear decay from 7.2% of cases in 2010 to 4.7% of cases in 2019 (R = 0.92, p = 0.0001). Laparoscopic/thoracoscopic cases also exhibited linear decay from 90.6% of cases in 2010 to 80.9% of cases in 2019 (R = 0.98, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS FC fellows are exposed to robust volumes of foregut cases. This rich data set provides an evidence-based guide for establishing criteria for potential foregut fellowships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Weis
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
| | | | | | - Juan Tellez
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael Awad
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Daniel J Scott
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Türkçapar AG, Şen O. Combined Partial Toupet Fundoplication With Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients With Morbid Obesity and Symptomatic GERD: Preliminary Results of the T-sleeve Technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2022; 32:324-328. [PMID: 35258016 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study to reveal preliminary results of our Toupet-sleeve technique in morbid obese patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and compare their outcomes with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) patients' outcomes. METHODS The study included 103 patients who underwent primary LSG between March 2018 and October 2020 and 18 patients who underwent partial T-sleeve. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to the surgical technique. All of the patients had preoperative symptomatic GERD. Patients were reevaluated with regard to GERD symptoms and weight loss in the postoperative period. Two groups' data were compared. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 39.2±10.2 years (63% female), and the mean body mass index was 43.2±6.4 kg/m2. The median operative time was 93 minutes (75 to 110 min) in group A (primary LSG) and 110 minutes (90 to 120 min) in group B (partial T-sleeve). The mean body mass index decreased to 28±4.5 kg/m2 in group A and 25.8±3.5 kg/m2 in group B at 12 months after the surgery. At the 12th month, the patients were reevaluated for GERD symptoms. Reflux symptoms were found to be resolved in 62% of the patients (n=64) in group A, while 32% of the patients (n=39) had persistent GERD symptoms. In group B, all of the patients had discontinued proton pump inhibitors postoperatively, and GERD symptoms were completely resolved in 94% of these patients (n=17). CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that T-sleeve provides a very good weight loss and reflux control in patients with symptomatic GERD with morbid obesity in the short-term period. This technique can be proposed in some cases as a primary treatment modality. High numbers of patients and longer follow-up are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ozan Şen
- Obesity Center, Türkçapar Bariatrics
- Faculty of Medicine, Nişantaşi University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:27-56. [PMID: 34807007 PMCID: PMC8754510 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 308] [Impact Index Per Article: 154.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.
Collapse
|
9
|
Assessment and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease following bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1919-1925. [PMID: 34620566 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease in patients with obesity. The incidence of de novo GERD and the effect of bariatric surgery on patients with pre-existing GERD remain controversial. Management of GERD following bariatric surgery is complicated and can range from medical therapy to non-invasive endoscopic options to invasive surgical options. To address these issues, we performed a systematic review of the literature on the incidence of GERD and the various modalities of managing GERD in patients following bariatric surgery. Given the increased number of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedures being performed and the high incidence of GERD following LSG, bariatric surgeons should be familiar with the options available to manage GERD following LSG as well as other bariatric procedures.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fass R, Boeckxstaens GE, El-Serag H, Rosen R, Sifrim D, Vaezi MF. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:55. [PMID: 34326345 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in adults and children. The global prevalence of GERD is high and increasing. Non-erosive reflux disease is the most common phenotype of GERD. Heartburn and regurgitation are considered classic symptoms but GERD may present with various atypical and extra-oesophageal manifestations. The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial and different mechanisms may result in GERD symptoms, including gastric composition and motility, anti-reflux barrier, refluxate characteristics, clearance mechanisms, mucosal integrity and symptom perception. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of GERD is commonly established on the basis of response to anti-reflux treatment; however, a more accurate diagnosis requires testing that includes upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy and reflux monitoring. New techniques and new reflux testing parameters help to better phenotype the condition. In children, the diagnosis of GERD is primarily based on history and physical examination and treatment vary with age. Treatment in adults includes a combination of lifestyle modifications with pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical intervention. In refractory GERD, optimization of proton-pump inhibitor treatment should be attempted before a series of diagnostic tests to assess the patient's phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie Fass
- The Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Guy E Boeckxstaens
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hashem El-Serag
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel Rosen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zerbib F, Bredenoord AJ, Fass R, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Vaezi M, Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP. ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14075. [PMID: 33368919 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Zerbib
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Ronnie Fass
- Digestive Health Center, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Digestive Physiology, Université de Lyon, Inserm U1032, LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric diversion after failed surgical fundoplication in a large cohort and a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:161-169. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
13
|
Yerdel MA, Özgen G, Çalıkoğlu İ. Letter to the Editor Concerning: Bures C, Benzing C, Marchesini JC, Sobottka WH, Sadowski JA, Marchesini JB, Zorron R. The "Hug" Technique-Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass with Preservation of the Posterior Wrap in Patients with Nissen Fundoplication: a Simple Solution for a Complex Problem. Obes Surg 2020; 31:1344-1346. [PMID: 33011922 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05019-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Yerdel
- İstanbul Bariatrics, Obesity and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad, Yeşil Çimen sok, Polat Tower, Şişli, 34394, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - Görkem Özgen
- İstanbul Bariatrics, Obesity and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad, Yeşil Çimen sok, Polat Tower, Şişli, 34394, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - İsmail Çalıkoğlu
- İstanbul Bariatrics, Obesity and Advanced Laparoscopy Center, Hakkı Yeten Cad, Yeşil Çimen sok, Polat Tower, Şişli, 34394, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shao JM, Elhage SA, Prasad T, Gersin K, Augenstein VA, Colavita PD, Heniford BT. Best reoperative strategy for failed fundoplication: redo fundoplication or conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric diversion? Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3865-3873. [PMID: 32676728 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07800-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failed fundoplication is a difficult reoperative challenge, with limited evidence differentiating outcomes of a redo fundoplication versus conversion to Roux-en-Y anatomy with a gastric diversion (RYGD). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these reoperative strategies on symptom resolution. METHODS A retrospective single institution study of patients with failed fundoplications undergoing conversion to RYGD or redo fundoplication between 2006 and 2019 was conducted. Patient characteristics, preoperative evaluation, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS 180 patients with symptomatic, failed fundoplications were identified: 101 patients (56.1%) underwent conversion to RYGD, and 79 patients (43.9%) underwent redo fundoplication. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher for the patients undergoing RYGD with mean BMI of 34.3 ± 6.9 vs 27.7 ± 3.9 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing conversion to RYGD were also more comorbid than their counterparts, with higher rates of obstructive sleep apnea (17.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.01), but similar rates of hypertension (54.5% vs 44.3%, p = 0.18, asthma/COPD (25.7% vs 16.5%, p = 0.13), diabetes (10.9% vs 10.1%, p = 0.87), and hyperlipidemia (29.7% vs 36.7%, p = 0.32). Mean operative times were significantly higher for the RYGD (359.6 ± 90.4 vs 238.8 ± 75.6 min, p < 0.0001), as was mean estimated blood loss (168.8 ± 207.5 vs 81.0 ± 145.4, p < 0.0001). Conversion rates from minimally invasive to open were similar (10.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.92). The incidence of recurrent reflux symptoms was not significantly different (p = 0.46) between RYGD (16.8%) and redo fundoplication (12.8%), at an average follow-up of 50.6 ± 140.7 vs 34.7 ± 39.2 months, (p = 0.03). For the RYGD cohort, patients also had resolution of other comorbidities including obesity 35.6%, OSA 16.7%, hyperlipidemia 10.0%, hypertension 9.1%, and diabetes 9.1%. On average, patients decreased their BMI by 6.8 ± 5.5 kg/m2 and lost 69.6% of their excess body weight. Mean length of stay was higher in patients undergoing RYGD (5.3 ± 7.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.9 days, p = 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar (9.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.12). The reoperation rate was higher in the RYGD cohort (17.8% vs 2.5%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS RYBG and redo fundoplication are equivalent in terms of resolution of reflux. RYGD resulted in significant loss of excess body weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny M Shao
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Sharbel A Elhage
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Tanu Prasad
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Keith Gersin
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Vedra A Augenstein
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Paul D Colavita
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - B Todd Heniford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Naeem Z, Yang J, Park J, Wang J, Docimo S, Pryor AD, Spaniolas K. A Step in the Right Direction: Trends over Time in Bariatric Procedures for Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Obes Surg 2020; 30:4243-4249. [PMID: 32562133 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04776-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently emerged as the predominant surgery type for the national bariatric cohort, the literature suggests that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) may be more effective in normalizing gastroesophageal physiology for the subset of patients with GERD. This study explored practice patterns over time for patients with GERD or hiatal hernia, a related comorbidity, undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS Data for LSG and LRYGB were extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) datasets for 2015-2018. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of pre-existing GERD or concomitant hiatal hernia repair on surgery type. RESULTS A total of 130,772 patients underwent LRYGB (30.5%) or LSG (69.5%) in 2015, which increased year-to-year to 161,275 patients in 2018 (74.61% LSG). A total of 38.4% LRYGB patients had pre-existing GERD vs. 27.55% LSG patients. Patients with pre-existing GERD were increasingly likely to undergo LRYGB vs. those without GERD (OR 1.205 [95% CI 1.17-1.24] in 2015 vs. OR 1.510 [95% CI 1.47-1.55] in 2018, p < 0.0001 across years). Concomitant hiatal hernia repair was less common among LRYGB patients across all years (OR 0.413 [95% CI 0.4-0.43] for 2015; OR 0.381 [95% CI 0.37-0.4] for 2016; OR 0.403 [95% CI 0.39-0.42] for 2017, OR 0.464 [95% CI 0.45-0.48] for 2018, p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION Bariatric patients with pre-existing GERD are increasingly likely to undergo LRYGB, consistent with the literature. LSG is presently more common in the overall cohort and among those undergoing concomitant hiatal hernia repair. Despite the growing recognition of GERD in bariatric patients, a significant discrepancy persists in hiatal hernia management per bariatric procedure type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaina Naeem
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center T18-040, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Junying Wang
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center T18-040, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center T18-040, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA
| | - Konstantinos Spaniolas
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center T18-040, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carandina S, Soprani A, Montana L, Murcia S, Valenti A, Danan M, d’Agostino J, Rivkine E, Nedelcu M. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: results of a multicenter study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:732-737. [PMID: 32222432 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
17
|
Long-term consequences of one anastomosis gastric bypass on esogastric mucosa in a preclinical rat model. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7393. [PMID: 32355175 PMCID: PMC7192900 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64425-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although bariatric surgery is proven to sustain weight loss in morbidly obese patients, long-term adverse effects have yet to be fully characterized. This study compared the long-term consequences of two common forms of bariatric surgery: one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in a preclinical rat model. We evaluated the influence of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length, malabsorption, and bile acid (BA) reflux on esogastric mucosa. After 30 weeks of follow-up, Wistar rats operated on RYGB, OAGB with a short BPL (15 cm, OAGB-15), or a long BPL (35 cm, OAGB-35), and unoperated rats exhibit no cases of esogastric cancer, metaplasia, dysplasia, or Barrett’s esophagus. Compared to RYGB, OAGB-35 rats presented higher rate of esophagitis, fundic gastritis and perianastomotic foveolar hyperplasia. OAGB-35 rats also revealed the greatest weight loss and malabsorption. On the contrary, BA concentrations were the highest in the residual gastric pouch of OAGB-15 rats. Yet, no association could be established between the esogastric lesions and malabsorption, weight loss, or gastric bile acid concentrations. In conclusion, RYGB results in a better long-term outcome than OAGB, as chronic signs of biliary reflux or reactional gastritis were reported post-OAGB even after reducing the BPL length in a preclinical rat model.
Collapse
|
18
|
Spann MD, Harrison NJ, English WJ, Bolduc AR, Aher CV, Williams DB, Hawkins AT. Efficacy and Safety of Recurrent Paraesophageal Hernia Repair with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313482008600336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been explored as a revisional option to failed paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair with fundoplication, particularly in patients suffering from obesity. However, few studies have assessed long-term outcomes of RYGB with revisional PEH repairin regard to acid-suppressing medication use. We retrospectively identified 19 patients who underwent revisional PEH repair with RYGB between 2011 and 2018. The median operative time was 232 minutes with a median hospital length of stay of two days. The median length of follow-up was 24 months. Two patients (10.5%) had complications in the first 30 days, and five patients (26.3%) had complications within one year. Of the 12 patients on preoperative acid suppression, 6 (50%) were either off medication or on reduced dose at 12 months. The median BMI decrease was 14.4 kg/m2at 12 months and did not change significantly afterward. Although rates of acid-suppression medication use did not change overall after revisional PEH repair with RYGB, patients experienced successful long-term management of morbid obesity and sustained weight loss. Revisional PEH repair with RYGB is a safe and effective option, with a complication rate comparable with the reported rates after revisional foregut procedures such as revisional Nissen fundoplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Spann
- Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Noah J. Harrison
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; and
| | - Wayne J. English
- Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Aaron R. Bolduc
- Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chetan V. Aher
- Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - D. Brandon Williams
- Department of Surgery, Section of Bariatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alexander T. Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Letter to the Editor Concerning: Petrucciani N, Sebastianelli L, Frey S, Iannelli A. From Nissen Fundoplication to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Treat Both GERD and Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg 2020; 30:2413-2414. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04492-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
20
|
Petrucciani N, Sebastianelli L, Frey S, Iannelli A. From Nissen Fundoplication to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Treat Both GERD and Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg 2019; 30:790-792. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04271-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
21
|
Bakhos CT, Patel SP, Petrov RV, Abbas AES. Management of Paraesophageal Hernia in the Morbidly Obese Patient. Thorac Surg Clin 2019; 29:379-386. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Şen O, Çalıkoğlu İ, Özgen G, Toydemir T, Türkçapar AG, Yerdel MA. Sleeve gastrectomy in patients with previous antireflux surgery. Preliminary results of the “no-touch to posterior wrap” technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:1668-1674. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
23
|
Braghetto I, Csendes A. FAILURE AFTER FUNDOPLICATION: RE-FUNDOPLICATION? IS THERE A ROOM FOR GASTRECTOMY? IN WHICH CLINICAL SCENARIES? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 32:e1440. [PMID: 31460600 PMCID: PMC6713057 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Background: Re-fundoplication is the most often procedure performed after failed fundoplication, but re-failure is even higher. Aim: The objectives are: a) to discuss the results of fundoplication and re-fundoplication in these cases, and b) to analyze in which clinical situation there is a room for gastrectomy after failed fundoplication. Method: This experience includes 104 patients submitted to re-fundoplication after failure of the initial operation, 50 cases of long segment Barrett´s esophagus and 60 patients with morbid obesity, comparing the postoperative outcome in terms of clinical, endoscopic, manometric and 24h pH monitoring results. Results: In patients with failure after initial fundoplication, redo-fundoplication shows the worst clinical results (symptoms, endoscopic esophagitis, manometry and 24 h pH monitoring). In patients with long segment Barrett´s esophagus, better results were observed after fundoplication plus Roux-en-Y distal gastrectomy and in obese patients similar results regarding symptoms, endoscopic esophagitis and 24h pH monitoring were observed after both fundoplication plus distal gastrectomy or laparoscopic resectional gastric bypass, while regarding manometry, normal LES pressure was observed only after fundoplication plus distal gastrectomy. Conclusion: Distal gastrectomy is recommended for patients with failure after initial fundoplication, patients with long segment Barrett´s esophagus and obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett´s esophagus. Despite its higher morbidity, this procedure represents an important addition to the surgical armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Italo Braghetto
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico "Dr. José J. Aguirre", Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago Chile
| | - Attila Csendes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico "Dr. José J. Aguirre", Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago Chile
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects millions of people worldwide. Many patients with medically refractory symptoms ultimately undergo antireflux surgery, most often with a laparoscopic fundoplication. Symptoms related to GERD may persist or recur. Revisional surgery is necessary in some patients. RECENT FINDINGS A reoperative fundoplication is the most commonly performed salvage procedure for failed fundoplication. Although redo fundoplication has been reported to have increased risk of morbidity compared with primary cases, increasing experience with the minimally invasive approach to reoperative surgery has significantly improved patient outcome with acceptable resolution of reflux symptoms in the majority of patients. Recurrence of reflux symptoms after an initial fundoplication requires a thorough work-up and a thoughtful approach. While reoperative fundoplication is the most common procedure performed, there are other options and the treatment should be tailored to the patient, their history, and the mechanism of fundoplication failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semeret Munie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Hassan Nasser
- Department of General Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Jon C Gould
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Minimally invasive Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a salvage operation after failed nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:2211-2218. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07010-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
26
|
Raj PP, Bhattacharya S, Misra S, Kumar SS, Khan MJ, Gunasekaran SC, Palanivelu C. Gastroesophageal reflux-related physiologic changes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:1261-1269. [PMID: 31279562 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a major concern as it affects the quality of life of the patients and potentially exposes them to the complications of GERD. The reported incidence of GERD after LSG is up to 35%. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is considered the procedure of choice for patients with morbid obesity with GERD but objective evidence based on physiologic studies for the same are limited. OBJECTIVE The objectives of the study were to determine the physiologic changes related to gastroesophageal reflux based on symptoms index, 24-hour pH study, impedance, and manometry after LSG and LRYGB. SETTINGS Tertiary care teaching hospital, India. METHODS This registered study (CTRI/2017/06/008834) is a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the incidence of GERD after LSG and LRYGB. In this study, non-GERD patients were evaluated for GERD based on clinical questionnaires, 24-hour pH study, and impedance manometry preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS Thirty patients underwent LSG, and 16 patients underwent LRYGB. The mean DeMeester score increased from 10.9 ± 11.8 to 40.2 ± 38.6 (P = .006) after LSG. The incidence of GERD after LSG was 66.6%. The increase in DeMeester score from 9.5 ± 4.6 to 12.2 ± 17.2 after LRYGB was not significant (P = .7). There was a significant increase in the nonacid reflux both after LSG and LRYGB. CONCLUSION The incidence of GERD after LSG is high, making it a contraindication for LSG. LRYGB remains the preferred procedure for patients with GERD. However, more studies are needed to understand the physiologic changes in patients with preexisting GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Praveen Raj
- Department of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.
| | - Siddhartha Bhattacharya
- Department of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| | - Shivanshu Misra
- Department of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| | - S Saravana Kumar
- Department of Bariatric & Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| | - Mohd Juned Khan
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| | | | - C Palanivelu
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in prevalence and associated with numerous metabolic complications leading to increased mortality and costs. Metabolic surgery, or surgery to treat T2DM and obesity, is effective at achieving remission from T2DM. This review discusses the most commonly used surgical options including the adjustable gastric band, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the sleeve gastrectomy, and the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and their ability to treat and prevent T2DM. RECENT FINDINGS There is an increasing body of literature that justifies the inclusion of metabolic surgery into the treatment algorithm for patients with obesity and T2DM. Metabolic procedures should be performed at centers that offer comprehensive treatment of metabolic disorders and have expertise in gastrointestinal surgery. The incremental improvement in the quality and safety of metabolic surgery has significantly reduced the risk of serious post-operative complications. Metabolic surgery is a safe and effective treatment option for obese patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Rachlin
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Carlos Galvani
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 390, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). As more surgeons recommend RYGB to treat GERD in patients with obesity, there are concerns about this approach in patients with previous non-bariatric foregut surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effect of previous non-bariatric foregut surgery on subsequent RYGB. METHODS Retrospective review of 2089 patients undergoing RYGB between January 1985 and June 2015 was conducted to identify all patients with previous non-bariatric foregut surgery. Perioperative and postoperative data was collected by retrospective chart review. RESULTS A total of 11 patients with prior non-bariatric foregut surgery underwent RYGB with median time between operations of 95.6 months. Of note, 7/11 (63.6%) had previous Nissen fundoplication. Conversion to open operation was required in 3/7 (42.9%) with previous Nissen compared to 1/4 (25%) in those without previous Nissen. The average length of stay (LOS) was 3.9 ± 0.9 days, significantly longer than our institutional average for RYGB of 3.2 ± 3.2 days (p = 0.02). Mean percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) was 64.7 ± 23.5 at 4-year median follow-up, comparable to our institution's previously reported data. No mortalities were attributed to RYGB and the overall complication rate was 18.2%, compared to our institutional complication rate for RYGB of 8.5% (p = 0.253). CONCLUSION Despite increased technical difficulty and increase perioperative morbidity, patients undergoing RYGB with previous non-bariatric foregut surgery had long-term symptom resolution and robust weight loss. This indicates that in the right hands, RYGB after non-bariatric foregut surgery may be performed safely and effectively.
Collapse
|
29
|
Roux-En-Y gastric bypass following failed fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3517-3524. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
30
|
Gyawali CP, Fass R. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:302-318. [PMID: 28827081 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 07/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) commonly starts with an empiric trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and complementary lifestyle measures, for patients without alarm symptoms. Optimization of therapy (improving compliance and timing of PPI doses), or increasing PPI dosage to twice daily in select circumstances, can reduce persistent symptoms. Patients with continued symptoms can be evaluated with endoscopy and tests of esophageal physiology, to better determine their disease phenotype and optimize treatment. Laparoscopic fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and endoscopic therapies can benefit patients with well-characterized GERD. Patients with functional diseases that overlap with or mimic GERD can also be treated with neuromodulators (primarily antidepressants), or psychological interventions (psychotherapy, hypnotherapy, cognitive and behavioral therapy). Future approaches to treatment of GERD include potassium-competitive acid blockers, reflux-reducing agents, bile acid binders, injection of inert substances into the esophagogastric junction, and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Obeid NR, Altieri MS, Yang J, Park J, Price K, Bates A, Pryor AD. Patterns of reoperation after failed fundoplication: an analysis of 9462 patients. Surg Endosc 2017; 32:345-350. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5682-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
32
|
De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, Busetto L, Scopinaro N, Weiner R, Sartori A, Stier C, Lakdawala M, Bhasker AG, Buchwald H, Dixon J, Chiappetta S, Kolberg HC, Frühbeck G, Sarwer DB, Suter M, Soricelli E, Blüher M, Vilallonga R, Sharma A, Shikora S. Indications for Surgery for Obesity and Weight-Related Diseases: Position Statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg 2016; 26:1659-96. [PMID: 27412673 PMCID: PMC6037181 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2271-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio De Luca
- Director Department of Surgery, Montebelluna Treviso Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy.
| | | | - Jacques Himpens
- The European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Alberto Sartori
- Director Department of Surgery, Montebelluna Treviso Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - John Dixon
- Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Michel Suter
- University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Mattias Blüher
- Department of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Arya Sharma
- Obesity Research Management, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Praveenraj P, Gomes RM, Kumar S, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Palanivelu C. Laparoscopic Undo of Fundoplication with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Morbidly Obese Patient with Prior Nissen's Fundoplication: A Video Report. Obes Surg 2015; 26:241. [PMID: 26581484 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1957-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be a better option for morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) for long-term reflux control. It is recommended after fundoplication if a patient is morbidly obese with GERD with failed fundoplication or if bariatric surgery is planned with a prior successful fundoplication (Kim et al., Am Surg 80(7):696-703, 2014; Kambiz Zainabadi, Surg Endosc. 22(12):2737-40, 2008). Complete takedown of the wrap to avoid stapling over the fundoplication creating an obstructed, septated pouch is needed (Kambiz Zainabadi, Surg Endosc. 22(12):2737-40, 2008). The aim of this video was to demonstrate the technical aspect of dissection and undo of Nissen's fundoplication followed by performance of a RYGB in a morbidly obese patient with GERD with prior successful Nissen's fundoplication opting for bariatric surgery after a year. METHODS We present a case of a 50-year-old woman with a BMI of 36.14 with previous laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication for severe GERD (controlled after surgery) and a prior laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair who presented for bariatric surgery 1 year after fundoplication. She was successfully treated by laparoscopic undo of the fundoplication with RYGB. RESULTS In this multimedia high-definition video, we present step-by-step the laparoscopic undo of a Nissen's fundoplication followed by RYGB. The procedure included lysis of all adhesions between the liver and the stomach, dissection of the diaphragmatic crura, complete takedown of the wrap, repair of the hiatal hernia, creation of a gastric pouch, creation of an antecolic Roux limb, gastrojejunal anastomosis, and jejuno-jejunal anastomosis. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic RYGB after fundoplication in morbidly obese patients with GERD is a technically difficult but feasible option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palanivelu Praveenraj
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India.
| | - Rachel M Gomes
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| | - Saravana Kumar
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| | - Palanisamy Senthilnathan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| | - Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| | - Subbiah Rajapandian
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, 45, Pankaja Mill Road, Gem Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, 641045, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Thereaux J, Roche C, Bail JP. Conversion of Nissen fundoplication to laparoscopic gastric bypass: video case report and literature review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11:973-4. [PMID: 26003900 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Thereaux
- Department of General, Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, La Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France; University of Bretagne Occidentale (UBO), Brest, France.
| | - Charles Roche
- Department of General, Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, La Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Bail
- Department of General, Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, La Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France; University of Bretagne Occidentale (UBO), Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Friedman DT, Moran-Atkin E. Management of the “Failed Nissen”. TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2015.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|