1
|
Kim H. Anesthetic management of the traumatic brain injury patients undergoing non-neurosurgery. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2023; 18:104-113. [PMID: 37183278 PMCID: PMC10183618 DOI: 10.17085/apm.23017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This article describes the anesthetic management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) undergoing non-neurosurgery, primarily targeting intraoperative management for multiple-trauma surgery. The aim of this review is to promote the best clinical practice for patients with TBI in order to prevent secondary brain injury. Based on the current clinical guidelines and evidence, anesthetic selection and administration; maintenance of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, oxygenation and ventilation; coagulation monitoring; glucose control; and temperature management are addressed. Neurological recovery, which is critical for improving the patient's quality of life, is most important; therefore, future research needs to be focused on this aspect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunjee Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cao J, Xie N, Qian P, Hu M, Tu J. Feasibility analysis of high pitch cervical spine CT in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spine trauma: An initial experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30785. [PMID: 36181071 PMCID: PMC9524935 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical computed tomography (CT) often suffers from examination failure in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spinal trauma. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using high-pitch cervical CT (HP-CT) in such populations. A total of 95 patients with acute neck/head-neck trauma who underwent HP-CT (n = 29) or standard cervical CT (SD-CT, n = 66) from October 2020 to June 2021 were included in this study. Differences in patient characteristics between the HP-CT group and the SD-CT group were firstly compared. Then, the objective image quality based on the mean score of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/contrast noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated, while double-blind five-point scoring was adopted for the subjective evaluation. Finally, radiation doses in HP-CT and SD-CT were compared. Furthermore, the Student t test and/or Mann-Whitney U test were performed to analyze differences in patient characteristics, image quality, and radiation dose between the two regimes. A total of 17 cases of cervical spine fractures were found in 95 patients, including 6 cases in the HP-CT group and 11 cases in the SD-CT group. The average age of patients who received HP-CT was higher than that of those who received SD-CT, and the scan time using HP-CT was shorter than that SD-CT. The differences were statistically significant (both, P < .05). In addition, there was no significant difference between HP-CT and SD-CT in terms of sex, body mass index, field of view (FOV), and scan length (all P > .05). The SNR/CNR at the middle and upper neck was not significantly different between HP-CT and SD-CT (all P > .05). However, the SNR/CNR at the lower neck in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). There was no significant difference in the subjective scores between HP-CT and SD-CT images in both the soft tissue and bone window (P = .129 and 0.649, respectively). The radiation dose in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). With a scan time reduction of 73%, radiation dose reduction of 10%, and similar image quality, high-pitch cervical CT was of feasibility to evaluate cervical spine injury in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spine trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juntao Cao
- Department of Radiology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Na Xie
- Department of Medical Imaging, Kunshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, China
| | - Pingkang Qian
- Trauma Center, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
| | - Ming Hu
- Department of Radiology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jianchun Tu
- Department of Radiology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China
- *Correspondence: Jianchun TU, Department of Radiology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. No. 189, Chaoyangxi Road, Kunshan City 215300, Jiangsu Province, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ng C, Feldstein E, Spirollari E, Vazquez S, Naftchi A, Graifman G, Das A, Rawanduzy C, Gabriele C, Gandhi R, Zeller S, Dominguez JF, Krystal JD, Houten JK, Kinon MD. Management and outcomes of adult traumatic cervical spondyloptosis: A case report and systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 103:34-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
4
|
Tribble DR, Spott MA, Shackleford SA, Gurney JM, Murray BCK. Department of Defense Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module Impact on Clinical Practice. Mil Med 2022; 187:7-16. [PMID: 35512379 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Joint Trauma System (JTS) is a DoD Center of Excellence for Military Health System trauma care delivery and the DoD's reference body for trauma care in accordance with National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017. Through the JTS, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed and subsequently refined to standardize and improve combat casualty care. Data are amassed through a single, centralized DoD Trauma Registry to support process improvement measures with specialty modules established as the registry evolved. Herein, we review the implementation of the JTS DoD Trauma Registry specialty Infectious Disease Module and the development of infection-related CPGs and summarize published findings on the subsequent impact of the Infectious Disease Module on combat casualty care clinical practice and guidelines. METHODS The DoD Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module was developed in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP) Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS). Infection-related information (e.g., syndromes, antibiotic management, and microbiology) were collected from military personnel wounded during deployment June 1, 2009 through December 31, 2014 and medevac'd to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany before transitioning to participating military hospitals in the USA. RESULTS To support process improvements and reduce variation in practice patterns, data collected through the Infectious Disease Module have been utilized in TIDOS analyses focused on assessing compliance with post-trauma antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations detailed in JTS CPGs. Analyses examined compliance over three time periods: 6 months, one-year, and 5 years. The five-year analysis demonstrated significantly improved adherence to recommendations following the dissemination of the 2011 JTS CPG, particularly with open fractures (34% compliance compared to 73% in 2013-2014). Due to conflicting recommendations regarding use of expanded Gram-negative coverage with open fractures, infectious outcomes among patients with open fractures who received cefazolin or expanded Gram-negative coverage (cefazolin plus fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides) were also examined in a TIDOS analysis. The lack of a difference in the proportion of osteomyelitis (8% in both groups) and the significantly greater recovery of Gram-negative organisms resistant to aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolones among patients who received expanded Gram-negative coverage supported JTS recommendations regarding the use of cefazolin with open fractures. Following recognition of the outbreak of invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) among blast casualties injured in Afghanistan, the ID Module was refined to capture data (e.g., fungal culture and histopathology findings, wound necrosis, and antifungal management) needed for the TIDOS team to lead the DoD outbreak investigation. These data captured through the Infectious Disease Module provided support for the development of a JTS CPG for the prevention and management of IFIs, which was later refined based on subsequent TIDOS IFI analyses. CONCLUSIONS To improve combat casualty care outcomes and mitigate high-consequence infections in future conflicts, particularly in the event of prolonged field care, expansion, refinement, and a mechanism for sustainability of the DoD Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module is needed to include real-time surveillance of infectious disease trends and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Tribble
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Mary Ann Spott
- Joint Trauma System, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wick J, Le H, Wick K, Peddada K, Bacon A, Han G, Carroll T, Swinford S, Javidan Y, Roberto R, Martin A, Ebinu J, Kim K, Klineberg E. Patient Characteristics, Injury Types, and Costs Associated with Secondary Over-Triage of Isolated Cervical Spine Fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:414-422. [PMID: 34366413 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To aim of this study was to identify patient variables, injury characteristics, and costs associated with operative and non-operative treatment following inter-facility transfer of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patients with isolated cervical spine fractures are subject to inter-facility transfer for surgical assessment, yet are often treated nonoperatively. The American College of Surgeons' benchmark rate of "secondary over-triage" is <50%. Identifying patient and injury characteristics as well as costs associated with treatment following transfer of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures may help reduce rates of secondary over-triage and healthcare expenditures. METHODS Patients transferred to a Level-1 trauma center with isolated cervical spine fractures between January 2015 and September 2020 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance data, injury characteristics, imaging workup, treatment, and financial data were collected for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify patient and injury characteristics associated with surgical treatment. RESULTS Nearly 75% of patients were treated non-operatively. Over 97% of transfers were accepted by the general surgery trauma service. Multivariable modeling found that higher BMI, presence of any neurologic deficit including spinal cord or isolated spinal nerve root injuries, present smoking status, or cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging obtained post-transfer, were associated with surgical treatment for isolated cervical spine fractures. Among patients with type II dens fractures, increased fracture displacement was associated with surgical treatment. Median charges to patients treated operatively and nonoperatively were $380,890 and $90,734, respectively. Median hospital expenditures for patients treated operatively and nonoperatively were $55,115 and $12,131, respectively. CONCLUSION A large proportion of patients with isolated cervical spine fractures are subject to over-triage. Injury characteristics are important for determining need for surgical treatment, and therefore interfacility transfer. Improving communication with spine surgeons when deciding to transfer patients may significantly reduce health care costs and resource use.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Wick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Hai Le
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Katherine Wick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Kranti Peddada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Adam Bacon
- University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Gloria Han
- University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Trevor Carroll
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Steven Swinford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Yashar Javidan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Rolando Roberto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Allan Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Julius Ebinu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Kee Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hauser BM, McNulty J, Zaki MM, Gupta S, Cote DJ, Bernstock JD, Lu Y, Chi JH, Groff MW, Khawaja AM, Smith TR, Zaidi HA. Predictors of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in patients with TBI: A nationwide analysis. Injury 2022; 53:1087-1093. [PMID: 34625238 PMCID: PMC8863622 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical spine injury screening is common practice for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. However, risk factors for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma remain unknown. We characterized epidemiology and clinical risk for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma in TBI. METHODS We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort analysis of TBI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011-2014 using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Out of 768,718 TBIs, 46,654 (6.1%) and 42,810 (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, respectively. Only 11% of thoracic and 7% of lumbar spine fracture patients had an accompanying spinal cord injury at any level. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (67% of thoracic and 71% and lumbar fractures). Predictors for both thoracic and lumbar fractures included moderate (thoracic: OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.21-1.31; lumbar: OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.08-1.18) and severe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.67-1.75; OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.13-1.20) compared to mild; epidural hematoma (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.28-1.44; OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.04-1.19); lower extremity injury (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.35-1.41; OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.45-2.55); upper extremity injury (OR 2.19, 95%CI 2.14-2.23; OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.13-1.18); smoking (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.12; OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.09-1.15); and obesity (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.34-1.45; OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.24-1.35). Thoracic injuries (OR 4.45; 95% CI 4.35-4.55) predicted lumbar fractures, while abdominal injuries (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.97-2.07) predicted thoracic fractures. CONCLUSIONS We identified GCS, smoking, upper and lower extremity injuries, and obesity as common risk factors for thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake M. Hauser
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John McNulty
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark M. Zaki
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Saksham Gupta
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David J. Cote
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua D. Bernstock
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Yi Lu
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John H. Chi
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ayaz M. Khawaja
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Hasan A. Zaidi
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khurana B, Keraliya A, Velmahos G, Maung AA, Bono CM, Harris MB. Clinical significance of "positive" cervical spine MRI findings following a negative CT. Emerg Radiol 2021; 29:307-316. [PMID: 34850316 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01992-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review and analyze the clinical significance of positive acute traumatic findings seen on MRI of the cervical spine (MRCS) following a negative CT of the cervical spine (CTCS) for trauma. METHODS We performed a sub-cohort analysis of 54 patients with negative CTCS and a positive MRCS after spine trauma from the previous multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT). Both CTCS and MRCS were independently reviewed by two emergency radiologists and two spine surgeons. The surgeons also commented on the clinical significance of the traumatic findings seen on MRCS and grouped them into unstable, potentially unstable, and stable injuries. RESULTS Among 35 unevaluable patients, MRCS showed one unstable (hyperextension) and two potentially unstable (hyperflexion) injuries. Subtle findings were seen on CTCS in 2 of 3 patients upon careful retrospective review that would have suggested these injuries. Of 19 patients presenting with cervicalgia, 2/5 (40%) patients with neurological deficit demonstrated clinically significant findings on MRCS with predisposing factors seen on CT. None of the 14 patients with isolated cervicalgia and no neurological deficit had clinically significant findings on their MRCS. CONCLUSION While CTCS is adequate for clearing the cervical spine in patients with isolated cervicalgia, MRCS can play a critical role in patients with neurological deficits and normal CTCS. Clinically significant traumatic findings were seen in 8.5% of unevaluable patients on MRCS, though these injuries in fact could be identified on the CT in 2 of 3 patients upon careful retrospective review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharti Khurana
- Trauma Imaging Research and Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., MA, 02115, Boston, USA.
| | - Abhishek Keraliya
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - George Velmahos
- Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Surgery Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Adrian A Maung
- Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, USA.,Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Christopher M Bono
- Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, 02114, Boston, USA
| | - Mitchel B Harris
- Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, 02114, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sutherland M, Bourne M, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Utilization of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of traumatic C-Spine injuries at a level 1 trauma center: A retrospective Cohort analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 68:102566. [PMID: 34336197 PMCID: PMC8318846 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Computerized tomography (CT) is a common imaging modality for trauma patients, but there is debate regarding the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical (C)-spine clearance. We aim to investigate the utilization of CT and MRI imaging in traumatic C-spine clearance and associated outcomes on patients who undergo both imaging modalities. Methods A 4-year retrospective review was performed to evaluate the trauma patient imaging algorithm at our institution. The algorithm required CT as a screening examination for traumatic injury patients who are unexaminable because of distracting injury, altered mental status, an abnormal neurological examination, and/or central neck pain. MRI was performed after CT in patients with C-spine injuries identified on CT, those who remained unexaminable, had an abnormal neurological examination, or experienced persistent central neck tenderness. Univariate analyses and adjusted multivariate logistic regression were performed with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results 805 patients were analyzed. Compared to MRI, CT had a sensitivity of 50.2%, specificity of 76.6%, positive predictive value of 69.7%, and negative predictive value of 59.0% in detecting C-spine injuries. CT and MRI differed significantly in their ability to detect C-spine soft tissue injuries and C1 vertebral fractures (p < 0.05). Conclusions MRI is more capable of detecting soft tissue injuries whereas CT is superior in detecting vertebral fractures. Our findings support the need to utilize CT and MRI in conjunction to detect both bony and soft tissue C-spine injuries in traumatically injured patients, who are either unexaminable, have an abnormal neurologic examination, or ongoing central neck tenderness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mason Sutherland
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mitchell Bourne
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mark McKenney
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Adel Elkbuli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Endler CH, Ginzburg D, Isaak A, Faron A, Mesropyan N, Kuetting D, Pieper CC, Kupczyk PA, Attenberger UI, Luetkens JA. Diagnostic Benefit of MRI for Exclusion of Ligamentous Injury in Patients with Lateral Atlantodental Interval Asymmetry at Initial Trauma CT. Radiology 2021; 300:633-640. [PMID: 34184931 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Cervical spine CT is regularly performed to exclude cervical spine injury during the initial evaluation of trauma patients. Patients with asymmetry of the lateral atlantodental interval (LADI) often undergo subsequent MRI to rule out ligamentous injuries. The clinical relevance of an asymmetric LADI and the benefit of additional MRI remain unclear. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of additional MRI in patients with blunt trauma who have asymmetry of the LADI and no other cervical injuries. Materials and Methods Patients who underwent cervical spine CT during initial trauma evaluation between March 2017 and August 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Those who underwent subsequent MRI because of LADI asymmetry of 1 mm or greater with no other signs of cervical injury were identified and reevaluated by two readers blinded to clinical data and initial study reports regarding possible ligamentous injuries. Results Among 1553 patients, 146 (9%) had LADI asymmetry of 1 mm or greater. Of these, 46 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 39 years ± 22; 28 men; median LADI asymmetry, 2.4 mm [interquartile range, 1.8-3.1 mm]) underwent supplementary MRI with no other signs of cervical injury at initial CT. Ten of the 46 patients (22%) showed cervical tenderness at clinical examination, and 36 patients (78%) were asymptomatic. In two of the 46 patients (4%), MRI revealed alar ligament injury; both of these patients showed LADI asymmetry greater than 3 mm, along with cervical tenderness at clinical examination, and underwent treatment for ligamentous injury. In 13 of the 46 patients (28%), signal intensity alterations of alar ligaments without signs of rupture were observed. Four of these 13 patients (31%) were subsequently treated for ligamentous injury despite being asymptomatic. Conclusion Subsequent MRI following CT of the cervical spine in trauma patients with lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry may have diagnostic benefit only in symptomatic patients. In asymptomatic patients without proven cervical injuries, subsequent MRI showed no diagnostic benefit and may even lead to overtreatment. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph H Endler
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Daniel Ginzburg
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Alexander Isaak
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Anton Faron
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Narine Mesropyan
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Daniel Kuetting
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Claus C Pieper
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Patrick A Kupczyk
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Ulrike I Attenberger
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| | - Julian A Luetkens
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., D.G., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., C.C.P., P.A.K., U.I.A., J.A.L.); and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory Bonn (QILaB), Bonn, Germany (C.H.E., A.I., A.F., N.M., D.K., P.A.K., J.A.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang R, Ryu RC, Kim TT, Alban RF, Margulies DR, Ley EJ, Barmparas G. Is magnetic resonance imaging becoming the new computed tomography for cervical spine clearance? Trends in magnetic resonance imaging utilization at a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 89:365-370. [PMID: 32744833 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing evidence supports the limited use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical spine (C-spine) clearance following blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the utilization of MRI of the C-spine at a Level I trauma center. METHODS All blunt trauma patients undergoing a computed tomography (CT) of the C-spine between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. The CT and MRI results, demographics, clinical presentation, subspecialty consultations, and interventions were recorded. The MRI results were considered clinically significant if they resulted in cervical thoracic orthosis/halo placement or surgical intervention. Linear regression models were utilized to identify trends. RESULTS There were 9,101 patients that underwent a CT of the C-spine, with 513 (5.6%) being positive for an acute injury. MRI was obtained for 375 (4.1%) of patients. A linear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing an MRI was noted, from 0.9% in 2009 to 5.6% in 2018 (p < 0.01). Of the 513 patients with a positive CT, 290 (56.5%) had an MRI. In 40 (13.8%) of them, the CT demonstrated a minor injury. Clinically significant MRI findings were noted only in two (5.0%) of the 40 patients, and both had a neurologic deficit on initial examination. Of the 8,588 patients with a negative CT, 85 (1.0%) underwent an MRI. Of those, 9 (10.6%) had a clinically significant MRI with all but one presenting with a neurological deficit. CONCLUSION MRI is increasingly utilized for C-spine clearance following blunt trauma. MRI was exceedingly unlikely to demonstrate a clinically significant finding in the absence of a neurological deficit, when the CT was negative or included minor injuries. Trauma centers are encouraged to constantly evaluate their own practices and intervene with education and collaboration to limit the excessive use of unnecessary resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level III or IV. Diagnostic test, level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Huang
- From the Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (R.H., R.F.A., D.R.M., E.J.L., G.B.), and Department of Orthopedics (R.C.R., T.T.K.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gabrieli A, Nardello F, Geronazzo M, Marchetti P, Liberto A, Arcozzi D, Polati E, Cesari P, Zamparo P. Cervical Spine Motion During Vehicle Extrication of Healthy Volunteers. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2019; 24:712-720. [PMID: 31750763 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1695298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Prehospital spinal motion restriction as a prevention technique for secondary neurological injury is a key principle in emergency medicine. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of different cervical spinal cord motion restriction techniques of awake and cooperative healthy volunteers during extrication.Methods: Twenty-three healthy volunteers were asked to exit a car (unassisted) with a rigid cervical collar (CC condition) or without it (autonomous exit: AE; instructed exit: IE); they were also extricated by two rescuers after setting a rigid cervical collar and by using an extrication device (CC + XT condition). Eight 3 D infrared cameras were calibrated around the vehicle to measure cervical spine angle, angular speed and acceleration in the sagittal plane. Surface wireless EMG electrodes were used to record superior trapezius, erector spinae and rectus abdominis muscle activity. All measures were recorded during two phases: device positioning (maneuver) and vehicle exiting.Results: The lowest range of motion was observed in CC during maneuver and exit (about 17°), the greatest in AE and IE (about 45°); when the extrication device was utilized along with the cervical collar (CC + XT) an increase, rather than a further decrease, in the range of motion was observed (about 25° during maneuver and exit). Larger values of angular speed and acceleration were observed in CC + XT when compared to CC, both during maneuver and exit (p < 0.001). The lowest EMG activity was observed during maneuver in CC and CC + XT; during exit a lower EMG activity was observed in CC + XT compared to CC (p < 0.001). Thus, when an extrication device is utilized (CC + XT), a lower active control of the cervical spine region is associated with faster and more brisk movements of the cervical spine compared to CC alone.Conclusions: Our findings support the idea that spinal motion restriction via rigid cervical collar of awake and cooperative trauma patients is effective in reducing cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane during vehicle extrication.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Following a blunt trauma, the goal of the cervical spine evaluation is to identify any injuries that might require active management: either through continued use of a collar or surgical stabilization. This is achieved through a step-wise approach that considers the nature of the patient's trauma, presenting complaints, distracting injuries and capacity to cooperate with the examination. In the last 15 to 20 years, technological advances in radiographic imaging have improved clinicians' abilities to certify the cervical spine as free of injury following blunt trauma. Within the last decade, the use of CT has supplanted plain radiograph imaging as the standard screening modality. Although MRI is more sensitive than CT in identifying occult cervical injury, particularly ligamentous or soft-tissue trauma, the standard addition of MRI to CT evaluation alone does not significantly increase the detection of clinically important cervical injuries.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cronin PK, Ferrone ML, Marso CC, Stieler EK, Beck AW, Blucher JA, Makhni MC, Simpson AK, Harris MB, Schoenfeld AJ. Predicting survival in older patients treated for cervical spine fractures: development of a clinical survival score. Spine J 2019; 19:1490-1497. [PMID: 31125694 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Emerging literature has identified the importance of pretreatment health and functional status as influential in the prognostication of survival. A comprehensive, accessible, predictive model for survival following cervical spine fracture has yet to be developed. PURPOSE To develop an accessible and intuitive predictive model for survival in individuals aged 50 and older treated for cervical spine fractures. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of records from two tertiary care centers (2009-2016). PATIENT SAMPLE Patients age 50 and older who received operative or nonoperative management for cervical fractures. OUTCOME MEASURES One-year mortality was the primary outcome with 3-month and 2-year mortality considered secondarily. METHODS Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with mortality. The magnitude and precision of the relationship with 1-year mortality for statistically significant variables determined weighting in the scoring system subsequently developed. Score performance was tested through multivariable regression and bootstrap simulation. In a sensitivity test, the performance of the score developed for 1-year mortality was assessed using figures for the 3-month and 2-year time-points. RESULTS We included 1,758 patients. Mortality rates were 12% at 3 months, 17% at 1 year, and 21% at 2 years. Following multivariable testing age, injury severity score and Glasgow coma scale demonstrated the strongest predictive values for a base score, followed by serum albumin and ambulatory status. The resultant composite score ranged from 0 (base score≤4, albumin≤3.5 g/dL, and dependent/nonambulator at presentation) to a maximum of 4 (base score≥5, albumin>3.5 g/dL, and independent ambulator at presentation). Following multivariable analysis, when compared to patients with a score of 4, significantly increased odds of 1-year mortality were appreciated for those with scores of 3 (odds ratio [OR] 7.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.77, 14.32), 2 (OR 8.43; 95% CI 4.66, 15.25), 1 (OR 17.47; 95% CI 9.81, 31.11), and 0 (OR 26.58; 95% CI 13.87, 50.92). Score performance was unchanged in bootstrap testing and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a useful prognostic utility capable of informing survival in individuals age 50 and older, following cervical spine fractures. The score can be applied to adjust patient expectations, anticipate outcomes, and as an adjunct to decision-making in the postinjury period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick K Cronin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Marco L Ferrone
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Chase C Marso
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Evan K Stieler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Aaron W Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Justin A Blucher
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Melvin C Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mitchel B Harris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02214, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Investigation Performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Färkkilä EM, Peacock ZS, Tannyhill RJ, Petrovick L, Gervasini A, Velmahos GC, Kaban LB. Frequency of cervical spine injuries in patients with midface fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 49:75-81. [PMID: 31301924 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the frequency and risk factors for cervical spine injury (CSI) in patients with midface fractures. Patients ≥18 years of age entered in the Massachusetts General Hospital Trauma Registry from 2007 to 2017 were identified. Those with a midface fracture, computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, and complete medical records were included. There were 23,394 patients in the registry; 3950 (16.9%) had craniomaxillofacial fractures and 1822 (7.8%) had a CSI. Craniomaxillofacial fractures included fractures of the midface (n=2803, 71.0%), mandible (n=873, 22.1%), and midface plus mandible (n=274, 6.9%). The overall frequency of CSI in patients with midface fractures was 11.4% (350/3077). Patients with midface fractures had a higher risk for CSI compared to patients without a midface fracture (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 2.1-2.4, P<0.001). In a multivariate model, nasal and orbital fractures, chest injuries, age, injury severity score, and motor vehicle crash or fall as the etiology were independent risk factors for CSI. Mortality was two times higher in subjects with CSI. Early and accurate diagnosis of CSI is a critical factor when planning the treatment of patients with these fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Färkkilä
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Z S Peacock
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R J Tannyhill
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - L Petrovick
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - A Gervasini
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - G C Velmahos
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - L B Kaban
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Galganski LA, Cox JA, Greenhalgh DG, Sen S, Romanowski KS, Palmieri TL. Cervical Spine Injury in Burned Trauma Patients: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes. J Burn Care Res 2019; 40:263-268. [PMID: 30801641 DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Cervical spine injuries (CIs) carry significant morbidity and mortality; hence, cervical spine immobilization is used liberally in trauma patients, including burns. The incidence, predictors, and outcomes of CI in burn patients are unknown. A retrospective cohort from the National Trauma Data Bank between 2007 and 2012 included all burned patients with and without CI. Predictors of CI were identified by logistic regression. Outcomes with and without CI were compared with Wilcoxon rank sum test. A total of 94,964 patients were identified with burn injuries. The incidence of CI was 0.79% (n = 745). Mechanism of injury, age, and injury severity score (ISS) were significant predictors of CI. Odds of CI were 109.4 (95% CI: 61.2-195.3, P < .0001) for motor vehicle injury, 87.8 (95% CI: 47.0-164.0, P < .0001) for falls, 1.2 (95% CI: 0.6-2.3, P = .66) for fire/flame, and 2.4 (95% CI: 1.0-5.5, P < .0001) for explosion compared with reference of hot object/substance. For every year increase in age, there were 1.02 higher odds of CI (95% CI: 1.01-1.02, P < .0001). For each point increase in ISS, there were 1.05 higher odds of CI (95% CI: 1.04-1.05, P < .0001). Patients with CI had higher mortality (10.3% vs 2.9%, P < .0001), longer total length of stay (12.0 vs 2.0 days, P < .0001), intensive care unit length of stay (4.0 vs 0.0 days, P < .001), and ventilator days (1.0 vs 0.0 days, P < .0001). The incidence of CI in burn patients is low, especially when due to fire, flame, or scalds; however, CI is associated with higher mortality and worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Galganski
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| | - Jessica A Cox
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| | - David G Greenhalgh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| | - Soman Sen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| | - Kathleen S Romanowski
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| | - Tina L Palmieri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.,Shriners Hospital for Children - Northern California, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boban J, Thurnher MM, Van Goethem JW. Spine and Spinal Cord Trauma. Clin Neuroradiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68536-6_28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
17
|
Novick D, Wallace R, DiGiacomo JC, Kumar A, Lev S, George Angus L. The cervical spine can be cleared without MRI after blunt trauma:A retrospective review of a single level 1 trauma center experience over 8 years. Am J Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
18
|
Färkkilä EM, Peacock ZS, Tannyhill RJ, Petrovick L, Gervasini A, Velmahos GC, Kaban LB. Risk Factors for Cervical Spine Injury in Patients With Mandibular Fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 77:109-117. [PMID: 30172763 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with mandibular fractures are known to be at risk of concomitant cervical spine injuries (CSIs). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for CSIs in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients with mandibular fractures from June 1, 2007, through June 30, 2017. Patients were identified through the Massachusetts General Hospital trauma registry and were included as study patients if they had a mandibular fracture and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine. The primary predictor variable was the site of the mandibular fracture; the primary outcome variables were the presence of CSIs and death. The other variables were demographic characteristics (age, gender, alcohol use, and drug use), Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, presence of midface and extra-craniofacial injuries, and etiology. Data analysis consisted of univariate correlations and construction of a multivariate model to determine independent risk factors for CSIs. RESULTS Of 23,394 patients in the trauma registry, 3,950 (17%) had craniomaxillofacial fractures and 1,822 (7.7%) had CSIs. The frequency of CSIs in the overall cohort of mandibular fracture patients (n = 1,147) was 4.4%, and for admitted patients (n = 495), it was 10%. The mean age of patients with mandibular fractures plus CSIs was 40 years (range, 19 to 93 years); 84% were men. Patients with a ramus-condyle unit fracture, mandibular fracture plus any midface fracture, non-craniomaxillofacial injury, and motor vehicle crash etiology had the highest frequency of CSIs. Ramus-condyle unit fractures and chest injuries were independent risk factors for CSIs in the multivariate model (P = .0334 and P = .0013, respectively). The mortality rate was 4-fold higher in patients with CSIs versus those without CSIs. CONCLUSIONS The presence of ramus-condyle unit fractures and the presence of chest injuries were independent risk factors for CSIs. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons should be diligent in ruling out CSIs in mandibular fracture patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esa M Färkkilä
- Research Fellow, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zachary S Peacock
- Assistant Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - R John Tannyhill
- Instructor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laurie Petrovick
- Program Manager, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alice Gervasini
- Nurse Director, Trauma & Emergency Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George C Velmahos
- Professor of Surgery and Chief, Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leonard B Kaban
- Walter C. Guralnick Distinguished Professor, Chief, Emeritus, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cervical spinal cord injury after blunt assault: Just a pain in the neck? Am J Surg 2018; 217:648-652. [PMID: 30665737 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) after blunt assault. METHODS The ACS National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) 2012 Research Data Set was used to identify victims of blunt assault using the ICD-9 E-codes 960.0, 968.2, 973. ICD-9 codes 805.00, 839.00, 806.00, 952.00 identified cervical vertebral fractures/dislocations and CSCI. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of CSCI. RESULTS 14,835 (2%) out of 833,311 NTDB cases were blunt assault victims and thus included. 217 (1%) had cervical vertebral fracture/dislocation without CSCI; 57 (0.4%) had CSCI. Age ≥55 years was independently predictive of CSCI; assault by striking/thrown object, facial fracture, and intracranial injury predicted the absence of CSCI. 25 (0.02%) patients with CSCI underwent cervical spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS CSCI is rare after blunt assault. While the odds of CSCI increase with age, facial fracture or intracranial injury predicts the absence of CSCI. SUMMARY The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) after blunt assault was investigated. 14,835 blunt assault victims were identified; 217 had cervical vertebral fracture/dislocation without CSCI; 57 had CSCI. Age ≥55 years was found to independently predict CSCI, while assault by striking/thrown object, facial fracture, and intracranial injury predicted the absence of CSCI.
Collapse
|
20
|
A New Craniothoracic Mattress for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine in Critical Care Patients. J Trauma Nurs 2018; 24:261-269. [PMID: 28692625 DOI: 10.1097/jtn.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Current immobilization techniques of the cervical spine are associated with complications including pressure ulcers, discomfort, and elevated intracranial pressures with limited access to the thorax and airway. In this study, a newly developed craniothoracic immobilizer (Pharaoh mattress) for critical care patients with cervical injury was tested for its restriction of cervical movement, peak interface pressures, comfort, and radiolucency, and compared with headblocks strapped to a spineboard. Cervical movement was measured by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in 5 fresh frozen cadavers. Peak interface and discomfort pressures were measured in 10 healthy volunteers. Radiographic absorption was calculated by measuring the total emission radiation with and without immobilizer. The Pharaoh mattress caused a mean restriction of 59% (SD: 15) flexion-extension, 77% (SD: 14) lateral bending, and 93% (SD: 3) rotation, compared with the unrestricted situation. No significant differences in restriction of cervical movement were found between headblocks strapped to a spineboard and the Pharaoh mattress. The mean peak pressures on the Pharaoh mattress were significantly lower than on the spineboard. Healthy volunteers gave significantly lower numeric discomfort scores on the Pharaoh mattress than on the spineboard. The Pharaoh mattress absorbed more x-rays than the spineboard. The Pharaoh mattress provides similar restriction of cervical movement compared with headblocks strapped to a spineboard but with lower interface pressures and increased comfort. This new mattress could be useful for immobilization of the cervical spine in critical care patients with mechanically instable spinal fractures.
Collapse
|
21
|
Utility of MRI for cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma patients after a negative CT. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:2823-2829. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5285-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Traumatic Fractures of the Cervical Spine: Analysis of Changes in Incidence, Cause, Concurrent Injuries, and Complications Among 488,262 Patients from 2005 to 2013. World Neurosurg 2018; 110:e427-e437. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Cervical spine evaluation and clearance in the intoxicated patient: A prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-Institutional Trial and Survey. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017; 83:1032-1040. [PMID: 28723840 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intoxication often prevents clinical clearance of the cervical spine (Csp) after trauma leading to prolonged immobilization even with a normal computed tomography (CT) scan. We evaluated the accuracy of CT at detecting clinically significant Csp injury, and surveyed participants on related opinions and practice. METHODS A prospective multicenter study (2013-2015) at 17 centers. All adult blunt trauma patients underwent structured clinical examination and imaging including a Csp CT, with follow-up thru discharge. alcohol- and drug-intoxicated patients (TOX+) were identified by serum and/or urine testing. Primary outcomes included the incidence and type of Csp injuries, the accuracy of CT scan, and the impact of TOX+ on the time to Csp clearance. A 36-item survey querying local protocols, practices, and opinions in the TOX+ population was administered. RESULTS Ten thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent CT Csp during the initial trauma evaluation. The majority were men (67%), had vehicular trauma or falls (83%), with mean age of 48 years, and mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 11. The overall incidence of Csp injury was 10.6%. TOX+ comprised 30% of the cohort (19% EtOH only, 6% drug only, and 5% both). TOX+ were significantly younger (41 years vs. 51 years; p < 0.01) but with similar mean Injury Severity Score (11) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (13). The TOX+ cohort had a lower incidence of Csp injury versus nonintoxicated (8.4% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.01). In the TOX+ group, CT had a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 99.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% for all Csp injuries. For clinically significant injuries, the NPV was 99.9%, and there were no unstable Csp injuries missed by CT (NPV, 100%). When CT Csp was negative, TOX+ led to longer immobilization versus sober patients (mean, 8 hours vs. 2 hours; p < 0.01), and prolonged immobilization (>12 hrs) in 25%. The survey showed marked variations in protocols, definitions, and Csp clearance practices among participating centers, although 100% indicated willingness to change practice based on these data. CONCLUSION For intoxicated patients undergoing Csp imaging, CT scan was highly accurate and reliable for identifying clinically significant spine injuries, and had a 100% NPV for identifying unstable injuries. CT-based clearance in TOX+ patients appears safe and may avoid unnecessary prolonged immobilization. There was wide disparity in practices, definitions, and opinions among the participating centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic tests or criteria, level II.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cervical spine MRI in patients with negative CT: A prospective, multicenter study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017; 82:263-269. [PMID: 27893647 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although cervical spine CT (CSCT) accurately detects bony injuries, it may not identify all soft tissue injuries. Although some clinicians rely exclusively on a negative CT to remove spine precautions in unevaluable patients or patients with cervicalgia, others use MRI for that purpose. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of abnormal MRI after a negative CSCT. METHODS Blunt trauma patients who either were unevaluable or had persistent midline cervicalgia and underwent an MRI of the C-spine after a negative CSCT were enrolled prospectively in eight Level I and II New England trauma centers. Demographics, injury patterns, CT and MRI results, and any changes in cervical spine management as a result of MRI imaging were recorded. RESULTS A total of 767 patients had MRI because of cervicalgia (43.0%), inability to evaluate (44.1%), or both (9.4%). MRI was abnormal in 23.6% of all patients, including ligamentous injury (16.6%), soft tissue swelling (4.3%), vertebral disc injury (1.4%), and dural hematomas (1.3%). Rates of abnormal neurological signs or symptoms were not different among patients with normal versus abnormal MRI. (15.2 vs. 18.8%, p = 0.25). The c-collar was removed in 88.1% of patients with normal MRI and 13.3% of patients with an abnormal MRI. No patient required halo placement, but 11 patients underwent cervical spine surgery after the MRI results. Six of the eleven had neurological signs or symptoms. CONCLUSIONS In a select population of patients, MRI identified additional injuries in 23.6% of patients despite a normal CSCT. It is uncertain if this is a true limitation of CT technology or represents subtle injuries missed in the interpretation of the scan. The clinical significance of these abnormal MRI findings cannot be determined from this study group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.
Collapse
|