A review of pancreatic cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cyst lesions

Optimal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) cutoff values in the diagnosis of neoplastic mucinous pancreatic cysts differ among assays

AIM

Pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a pivotal test in the diagnosis and management of neoplastic mucinous cysts (NMC) of the pancreas. Cyst fluid CEA levels of 192 ng/mL have been widely used to identify NMC. However, CEA values are unique to and significantly differ between individual assays with various optimal cutoffs reported in the literature for NMC. Here, we investigate the optimal CEA cut-off value of pancreatic cysts from two different assays to identify differences in thresholds.

METHODS

Pancreatic cyst fluid CEA levels, CEA assay platform (Beckman Dxl (BD) or Siemens Centaur XP (SC)), and clinical/pathological information were retrospectively collected. Cases were categorised into either NMC or non-NMC. Optimal CEA cut-off values were calculated via a receiver operator characteristic curve. Cut-off values were then identified separately by assay platform.

RESULTS

In total, 149 pancreatic cystic lesions with concurrent CEA values (SC: n=47; BD: n=102) were included. Histological correlation was available for 26 (17%) samples. The optimal CEA cut-off value for all samples at the study institution was 45.9 ng/mL (area under the curve (AUC)=86, Sn=85.7%, Sp=73.8%). When analysed separately by CEA assay, the cut-off values were 45.9 ng/mL (AUC=84.27, Sn=89.7%, Sp=71.4%) for BD and 24.4 ng/mL (AUC=77, Sn=81.8%, Sp=75%) for SC (p=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed an optimal pancreas cyst CEA cut-off threshold of 45.9 ng/mL, which is lower than commonly cited literature with different cutoffs on the two separate platforms (BD: 45.9 ng/mL, SC: 24.4 ng/mL).

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and cyst fluid tumor markers in diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are common in clinical practice. The accurate classification and diagnosis of these lesions are crucial to avoid unnecessary treatment of benign lesions and missed opportunities for early treatment of potentially malignant lesions.

AIM

To evaluate the role of cyst fluid analysis of different tumor markers such as cancer antigens [e.g., cancer antigen (CA)19-9, CA72-4], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 1 (SPINK1), interleukin 1 beta (IL1-β), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)], amylase, and mucin stain in diagnosing pancreatic cysts and differentiating malignant from benign lesions.

METHODS

This study included 76 patients diagnosed with PCLs using different imaging modalities. All patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for characterization and sampling of different PCLs.

RESULTS

The mean age of studied patients was 47.4 ± 11.4 years, with a slight female predominance (59.2%). Mucin stain showed high statistical significance in predicting malignancy with a sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 95.56%. It also showed a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.1% and 91.49%, respectively (P < 0.001). We found that positive mucin stain, cyst fluid glucose, SPINK1, amylase, and CEA levels had high statistical significance (P < 0.0001). In contrast, IL-1β, CA 72-4, VEGF-A, VEGFR2, and PGE2 did not show any statistical significance. Univariate regression analysis for prediction of malignancy in PCLs showed a statistically significant positive correlation with mural nodules, lymph nodes, cyst diameter, mucin stain, and cyst fluid CEA. Meanwhile, logistic multivariable regression analysis proved that mural nodules, mucin stain, and SPINK1 were independent predictors of malignancy in cystic pancreatic lesions.

CONCLUSION

EUS examination of cyst morphology with cytopathological analysis and cyst fluid analysis could improve the differentiation between malignant and benign pancreatic cysts. Also, CEA, glucose, and SPINK1 could be used as promising markers to predict malignant pancreatic cysts.

Co-analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and glucose with novel cut-off levels better distinguishes between mucinous and non-mucinous neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cyst fluid analysis plays an important role in distinguishing between mucinous and non-mucinous cyst lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, and glucose in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) and determine the best cut-off levels.

METHODS

Patients' data were evaluated retrospectively. 102 patients' PCLs were grouped as non-neoplastic (n = 25), non-mucinous neoplastic (n = 20), mucinous neoplastic (n = 47) and pancreatic adenocarcinomas with cystic degeneration (n = 10); and CEA, CA 19-9, and glucose levels were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the ideal cut-off values were determined.

RESULTS

Cyst fluid CEA and CA 19-9, levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) and glucose levels were significantly lower (P = 0.001) in mucinous than in non-mucinous neoplastic PCLs. Area under curve with 95% confidence interval of CEA, glucose and CEA and glucose test combination was 0.939 (95% CI = 0.885-0.993, P = 0.001), 0.809 (95% CI = 0.695-0.924, P < 0.001) and 0.937 (95% CI = 0.879-0.995), respectively. CEA cut-offs to rule-in and rule-out mucinous neoplastic were 135.1 ng/mL (sensitivity = 62%, specificity = 94.7%) and 6.12 ng/mL (sensitivity = 94.1%, specificity = 80.4%), respectively. Glucose cut-off of 2.8 mmol/L was chosen both to rule-in and rule-out mucinous neoplastic PCLs (sensitivity = 78%, specificity = 80%). Co-analysis of CEA and glucose to distinguish mucinous from non-mucinous neoplastic PCLs had sensitivity = 87.8%, specificity = 93.3%, and diagnostic accuracy = 89.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that co-analysis of cyst fluid CEA (cut-off = 135.1 ng/mL) and glucose (cut-off = 2.8 mmol/L) at novel cut-offs had the best testing performance to rule-in mucinous neoplastic PCLs. To rule-out mucinous PCLs co-analysis of CEA (cut-off = 6.12 ng/mL) and glucose (cut-off = 2.8 mmol/L) added value to prediction.

Pancreatic cyst fluid glucose in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous pancreatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, low levels of intracystic glucose acquired with EUS-guided pancreatic cyst fluid sampling have been shown to help to differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous cystic neoplasms. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of pancreatic cyst fluid glucose compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for pancreatic cystic lesions.

METHODS

Individualized searches were developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and meta-analysis analyzed according to Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy working group methodology. A bivariate model was used to compute pooled sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristics curve for intracystic glucose or CEA alone or combination testing.

RESULTS

Eight studies (609 lesions; mean patient age, 63.56 ± 2.75 years; 60.36% women) were included. The pooled sensitivity for pancreatic cyst fluid glucose was significantly higher compared with CEA alone (91% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 88-94; I² = .00] vs 56% [95% CI, 46-66; I² = 537.14]; P < .001) with no difference in specificity (86% [95% CI, 81-90; I² = 24.16] vs 96% [95% CI, 90-99; I² = 38.06]; P > .05). Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for pancreatic cyst fluid glucose versus CEA alone (94% [95% CI, 91-96] vs 85% [95% CI, 82-88]; P < .001). Combination testing with pancreatic cyst fluid glucose and CEA did not improve the diagnostic accuracy compared with glucose alone (97% [95% CI, 95-98] vs 94% [95% CI, 91-96]; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low pancreatic cyst fluid glucose was associated with a high sensitivity and specificity with significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared with CEA alone for the diagnosis of mucinous versus nonmucinous pancreatic cystic lesions.

Updates in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts

Incidental pancreatic cysts are commonly encountered with some cysts having malignant potential. The most common pancreatic cystic neoplasms include serous cystadenoma, mucinous cystic neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Risk stratifying pancreatic cysts is important in deciding whether patients may benefit from endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or surgical resection. Surgery should be reserved for patients with malignant cysts or cysts at high risk for developing malignancy as suggested by various risk features including solid mass, nodule and dilated main pancreatic duct. EUS may supplement magnetic resonance imaging findings for cysts that remain indeterminate or have concerning features on imaging. Various cyst fluid markers including carcinoembryonic antigen, glucose, amylase, cytology, and DNA markers help distinguish mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. This review will guide the practicing gastroenterologist in how to evaluate incidental pancreatic cysts and when to consider referral for EUS or surgery. For presumed low risk cysts, surveillance strategies will be discussed. Managing pancreatic cysts requires an individualized approach that is directed by the various guidelines.

CISTOADENOMA SEROSO DE PÂNCREAS. POR QUE A ACURÁCIA É BAIXA AOS EXAMES DE IMAGEM?

Many patients with serous cystadenoma of the pancreas (SCP) underwent surgery due to diagnostic doubt.

Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: A prospective study on the role of intra-cystic glucose concentration

BACKGROUND

The accuracy and costs of current diagnostic methods in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions still has ample room for improvement.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to confirm the diagnostic yield of intracystic glucose in the diagnosis of pancreatic cyst subtypes.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited all patients who underwent Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration of pancreatic cyst at our Institution.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study. We found that intracystic glucose concentration < 50 mg/dL was significantly more sensitive than a concentration of Carcinoembryonic Antigen > 192 ng/mL (93.6% vs 54.8%; p = 0.003) for the diagnosis of mucinous cysts. In terms of specificity, the two markers were not different (96% vs 100%; p = 1). Regarding the diagnosis of non-mucinous cysts, intracystic glucose concentration ≥ 50 mg/mL showed higher sensitivity than Carcinoembryonic Antigen level < 5 ng/mL (96% vs 72%) although a statistical significance could not be reached (p = 0.07). The two markers were not statistically different in terms of specificity (93.6% vs 87.1%; p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Given its diagnostic performance and ease of measurement, intracystic glucose may replace Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the differential diagnosis of mucinous versus non-mucinous pancreatic cysts.

Molecular Diagnosis of Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas: a Review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of incidental pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) has increased dramatically with advancements in cross-sectional imaging. Diagnostic imaging is limited in differentiating between benign and malignant PCNs. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of biomarkers that can be used to distinguish PCNs.

METHODS

A review of the literature on molecular diagnosis of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas was performed.

RESULTS

Pancreatic cysts can be categorized into inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Inflammatory cysts include pancreatic pseudocysts. Noninflammatory lesions include both mucinous and non-mucinous lesions. Mucinous lesions include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm. Non-mucinous lesions include serous cystadenoma and solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Imaging, cyst aspiration, and histologic findings, as well as carcinoembryonic antigen and amylase are commonly used to distinguish between cyst types. However, molecular techniques to detect differences in genetic mutations, protein expression, glycoproteomics, and metabolomic profiling are important developments in distinguishing between cyst types.

DISCUSSION

Nomograms incorporating common clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings have been developed in a better effort to predict malignant IPMN. The incorporation of top molecular biomarker candidates to nomograms may improve the predictive ability of current models to more accurately diagnose malignant PCNs.

Cyst fluid glucose: An alternative to carcinoembryonic antigen for pancreatic mucinous cysts

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have been increasingly recognized in clinical practice. Although inflammatory cysts (pseudocysts) are the most common PCLs detected by cross-sectional imaging modalities in symptomatic patients in a setting of acute or chronic pancreatitis, incidental pancreatic cysts with no symptoms or history of pancreatitis are usually neoplastic cysts. For these lesions, it is imperative to identify mucinous cysts (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms) due to the risk of their progression to malignancy. However, no single imaging modality alone is sufficient for a definitive diagnosis of all PCLs. The cyst fluid obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration provides additional information for the differential diagnosis of PCLs. Current recommendations suggest sending cyst fluid for cytology evaluation and measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of cytology is greatly limited, and cyst fluid CEA has demonstrated insufficient accuracy as a predictor of mucinous cysts. More recently, cyst fluid glucose has emerged as an alternative to CEA for distinguishing between mucinous and nonmucinous lesions. Herein, the clinical utility of cyst fluid glucose and CEA for the differential diagnosis of PCLs was evaluated.

To resect or not to resect: a review of pancreatic cyst disease management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With recent advances in radiographic testing, there have been increases in the incidental identification of pancreatic cysts. Determining management, specifically, which cysts can be watched versus intervened upon has significant impact on at the patient-physician level as well as globally on resource allocation and healthcare expenditures. This review focuses on the three main guidelines (Fukuoka guidelines, European consensus, and American Gastroenterological Association recommendations) for management of pancreatic cystic disease after incidental identification.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are iterant revisions to each set of recommendations every few years as new data is published on the subject. This review encompasses the most up-to-date recommendations for management while also providing a framework for conceptualizing work-up for varying types of pancreatic cystic disease before and after incidental identification.

SUMMARY

Pancreatic cystic disease should be approached in thoughtful clinical manner, and each cyst should be evaluated in the context of patient's health and healthcare goals. All cysts, however, should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. Applications of different diagnostic modalities like MRI and EUS with FNA can better characterize cystic lesions and assess malignant potential. Resection should always be considered in cysts with concerning features. If deferred, surveillance should be continued indefinitely. Early termination of surveillance risks future malignant progression.

Light scattering spectroscopy identifies the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts during endoscopy

Pancreatic cancers are usually detected at an advanced stage and have poor prognosis. About one fifth of these arise from pancreatic cystic lesions. Yet not all lesions are precancerous, and imaging tools lack adequate accuracy for distinguishing precancerous from benign cysts. Therefore, decisions on surgical resection usually rely on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Unfortunately, cyst fluid often contains few cells, and fluid chemical analysis lacks accuracy, resulting in dire consequences, including unnecessary pancreatic surgery for benign cysts and the development of cancer. Here, we report an optical spectroscopic technique, based on a spatial gating fibre-optic probe, that predicts the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic lesions during routine diagnostic EUS-FNA procedures. In a double-blind prospective study in 25 patients, with 14 cysts measured in vivo and 13 postoperatively, the technique achieved an overall accuracy of 95%, with a 95%confidence interval of 78-99%, in cysts with definitive diagnosis.

Prospective validation of microRNA signatures for detecting pancreatic malignant transformation in endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease. Novel biomarkers are required to aid treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are potentially ideal diagnostic biomarkers, as they are stable molecules, and tumour and tissue specific.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed an endoscopic-ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) 2-miRNA classifier (miR-21 + miR-155) capable of distinguishing benign from malignant pancreatic lesions with a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 85.7% (AUC 0.930). Validation FNA cohorts confirmed both miRNAs were overexpressed in malignant disease, while circulating miRNAs performed poorly.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with a suspicious pancreatic lesion on cross-sectional imaging were evaluated by EUS-FNA. At echo-endoscopy, the first part of the FNA was sent for cytological assessment and the second part was used for total RNA extraction. Candidate miRNAs were selected after careful review of the literature and expression was quantified by qRT-PCR. Validation was performed on an independent cohort of EUS-FNAs, as well as formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) and plasma samples.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide further evidence for using miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic malignancy. We demonstrate the feasibility of using fresh EUS-FNAs to establish miRNA-based signatures unique to pancreatic malignant transformation and the potential to enhance risk stratification and selection for surgery.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: radiological predictors of malignant transformation and the introduction of bile duct dilation to current guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current guidelines as a model to predict malignancy and to determine further radiological predictors of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

METHODS

384 patients who had undergone a pancreatic operation with the pathological diagnosis of IPMN as well as applicable pre-operative imaging (CT/MRI) were included in the study. Images were evaluated retrospectively in consensus by two radiologists, using a standardized checklist. Descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression and receiver operator curve analysis were performed to assess the International Consensus Guidelines and other radiological predictors of clinical malignancy (defined as carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma).

RESULTS

The best independent predictors of malignancy (n = 191) were solid components [odds ratio (OR) 3.98], parenchymal atrophy with main pancreatic duct dilation 5-9 mm (OR: 5.1) and common bile duct (CBD) dilation (OR: 31.26). >96% of all cases with CBD dilation were malignant IPMNs (positive-predictive value 96.4%; negative-predictive value 63.1%). Analysis of the current guidelines showed a diagnostic improvement with the addition of CBD dilation on determining the malignancy of IPMNs (sensitivity 82.2%/86.9%; specificity 72.7%/74.6%). Subanalysis of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs; n = 168) also resulted in a diagnostic improvement with the addition of CBD dilation (sensitivity 28.6%/45.2%; specificity 92.9%/92.1%). The best independent predictors of malignancy for BD-IPMNs were parenchymal atrophy (OR: 4.00) and CBD dilation (OR: 29.3). Frequency analysis revealed that even small BD-IPMNs had already undergone malignant transformation (≤1 cm: 15%; 1-2 cm: 26%; 2-3 cm: 20%) with about 10% of those having a dilated bile duct.

CONCLUSION

CBD dilation was a significant positive predictor of malignancy in IPMNs regardless of their size.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Introduction of CBD dilation as a radiological predictor for malignancy might increase the diagnostic accuracy of current imaging-based guidelines.

Clinical approach to incidental pancreatic cysts

The approach to incidentally noted pancreatic cysts is constantly evolving. While surgical resection is indicated for malignant or higher risk cysts, correctly identifying these highest risk pancreatic cystic lesions remains difficult. Using parameters including cyst size, presence of solid components, and pancreatic duct involvement, the 2012 International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines have sought to identify the higher risk patients who would benefit from further evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Not only can EUS help further assess the presence of solid component and nodules, but also fine needle aspiration of cyst fluid aids in diagnosis by obtaining cellular, molecular, and genetic data. The impact of new endoscopic innovations with novel methods of direct visualization including confocal endomicroscopy require further validation. This review also highlights the differences between the 2012 IAP and 2015 AGA guidelines, which include the thresholds for sending patients for EUS and surgery and methods, interval, and duration of surveillance for unresected cysts.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cyst fluid

Due to the advances and increased utility of abdominal cross-sectional imaging, the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts continues to increase. Many endosonographers, pancreatologists, and surgeons consider endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to be an essential tool in the management of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). EUS can help distinguish between mucinous and nonmucinous lesions and may identify the specific cyst type. EUS achieves these goals by delineating the cyst morphology, identifying high risk stigmata and worrisome features, and through image-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cyst fluid analysis. However, recent consensus statements have called to question the utility and diminished the role of EUS in this setting. The aim of this review is to assess the role and advances of EUS-FNA in pancreatic cyst fluid analysis, specifically in terms of fluid cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) analysis.

Cyst Features and Risk of Malignancy in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Imaging and Pathology

Background

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) display diverse macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics with typical morphological appearance in magnetic resonance imaging. Depending on those, IPMNs may show progression into invasive carcinomas with variable frequency. Overall, IPMN-associated invasive carcinomas are found in about 30% of all IPMNs, revealing phenotpyes comparable with conventional ductal adenocarcinomas or mucinous (colloid) carcinomas of the pancreas. In Sendai-negative side-branch IPMNs, however, the annual risk of the development of invasive cancer is 2%; thus, risk stratification with regard to imaging and preoperative biomarkers and cytology is mandatory.

Methods and Results

The present study addresses the radiological and interventional preoperative measures including histological features to determine the risk of malignancy and the prognosis of IPMNs.

Conclusion

While preoperative imaging largely relies on the detection of macroscopic features of IPMNs, which are associated with a divergent risk of malignant behavior, in resected specimens the determination of the grade of dysplasia and the detection of an invasive component are the most important features to estimate the prognosis of IPMNs.

Diagnostic approach to pancreatic cysts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diagnosis of pancreatic cysts remains challenging due to limitations of currently available radiologic and endoscopic tools. The diagnostic approach should focus on identifying mucinous and malignant cysts. Mucinous cysts require further differentiation to allow appropriate management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the overall rate of malignant pancreatic cysts is low, it remains higher than the general population. MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the preferred imaging modality for pancreatic cysts. Attempts to improve diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration include performing cyst wall cytology and DNA analysis. The 2012 international consensus guidelines for mucinous cystic neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm are superior to the original 2006 guidelines, although issues include the relatively poor ability to diagnose malignant cysts leading to unnecessary surgeries and the de-emphasis of cyst size. Cyst size remains an important predictor of malignancy. Translational research involving genomics, microRNA, proteomics, and metabolomics holds promise for improved biomarkers. Endoscopic innovations may safely aid in cyst diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Incremental improvements in pancreatic cyst diagnosis have occurred with new biomarkers and endoscopic tools requiring validation in large-scale studies.

Incidental Cystic Lesions in the Pancreas: Resect? EUS? Follow?

Pancreatic cysts challenge clinicians due to their increased incidental identification on radiology imaging, the limitations of currently available diagnostic tools, and potential for malignancy. Following initial identification of an incidental pancreatic cyst, a dedicated pancreatic protocol abdominal CT scan or MRI pancreas with MRCP should be performed. Surgical resection is recommended for all surgical candidates with MD-IPMN, mixed or combined type IPMN, mucinous cystic neoplasm, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasm. Serous cystadenoma may be followed with serial imaging unless the patient develops symptoms, the cyst is larger than 4 cm or rapidly growing, or diagnostic uncertainty remains despite thorough evaluation. Surveillance is also recommended for BD-IPMN without the following features concerning malignancy: obstructive jaundice with a cyst in the head of the pancreas; solid component; nodule; main pancreatic duct ≥10 mm; or cytology suspected or positive for malignancy. BD-IPMN ≥3 cm without concerning features may also be followed carefully, although surgical resection should be considered in surgically fit patients. EUS-FNA for cyst wall cytology, CEA, amylase, and occasionally k-ras mutation are also likely aids in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts beyond radiologic imaging. This author typically recommends EUS-FNA to further evaluate cysts larger than 1 cm without definitive indication for resection. EUS is also appropriate in patients with solid component, nodule, or size ≥3 cm to aid in decision making, especially in older patients who may be less suitable surgical candidates. A multidisciplinary approach with a team of dedicated gastrointestinal radiologists, pancreatic surgeons, gastrointestinal pathologists, and gastroenterologists is essential for managing patients with pancreatic cysts.