Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes

Examining the Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are commonly used in oncology clinical practice and have shown benefits for patients and health resource use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the isolated effect of administering ePROs to patients with cancer versus a control condition.

METHODS

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating ePRO interventions that aimed to improve health-related outcomes among patients with cancer were included. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and the secondary outcomes were symptoms, hospital admissions, unplanned visits, chemotherapy completion, survival, and satisfaction with care. The effect sizes of ePROs on health-related outcomes were analyzed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The search identified 10,965 papers, of which 19 (0.17%) from 15 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed an improvement in HRQOL at 3 months, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (SMD 0.28, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.78), and at 6 months, assessed using various HRQOL measures (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -1.24 to 1.39). The results should be interpreted with caution, given the wide 95% CIs. Of the 15 studies, 9 (60%) reported a positive signal on HRQOL, with two-thirds of the studies (n=6, 67%) including tailored patient advice and two-thirds (n=6, 67%) using clinician alert systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed a potential improvement in HRQOL at 6 months and in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores at 3 months for studies that included tailored advice and clinician alerts, suggesting that these elements may improve ePRO effectiveness. The findings will provide guidance for future use and help health care professionals choose the most suitable ePRO features for their patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020175007; https://tinyurl.com/5cwmy3j6.

Remote symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcome measures in outpatients with chronic kidney disease (PROKID): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority study

Background

The increasing incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is straining the capacity of outpatient clinics. Remote healthcare delivery might improve CKD follow-up compared with conventional face-to-face follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to empower remote follow-up and patient engagement. The consequences of shifting from face-to-face follow-up to remote outpatient follow-up on kidney function, health resource utilisation and quality of life remain unknown.

Methods

We conducted a multicentre pragmatic non-inferiority trial at three outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region. A total of 152 incident outpatients with CKD were randomised (1:1:1) to either PRO-based, PRO-telephone follow-up or standard of care (SoC). The primary outcome was the annual change in kidney function measured by the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The non-inferiority margin was an eGFR of 2.85 ml/min/1.73 m2/year. Mean differences were estimated using intention-to-treat (ITT), per protocol and random coefficient models.

Results

Mean eGFR slope differences between PRO-based and SoC were -0.97 ml/min/1.73 m2/year [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.00-1.07] and -1.06 ml/min/1.73 m2/year (95% CI -3.02-0.89) between PRO-telephone and SoC. Non-inferiority was only established in the per-protocol analysis due to CIs exceeding the margin in the ITT group. Both intervention groups had fewer outpatient visits: -4.95 (95% CI -5.82 to -4.08) for the PRO-based group and -5.21 (95% CI -5.95 to -4.46) for the PRO-telephone group. We found no significant differences in quality of life, illness perception or satisfaction.

Conclusion

Differences in the eGFR slope between groups were non-significant and results on non-inferiority were inconclusive. Thus, transitioning to remote PRO-based follow-up requires close monitoring of kidney function. Reducing patients' attendance in the outpatient clinic was possible without decreasing either quality of life or illness perception.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03847766.

Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, and to support self-management, repeated consultations in specialist outpatient care are often required. The emergence of new digital solutions has revolutionized how health care services can be patient centered, providing unprecedented opportunities for flexible, high-quality care. However, there is a lack of studies exploring how the use of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for flexible specialist care affects diabetes self-management. To provide new knowledge on the relevance of using PROMs in standard care, we have designed a multimethod prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The overall aim of this protocol is to describe our prospective multimethod observational study designed to investigate digital PROMs in a routine specialist outpatient setting for flexible patient-centered diabetes care (DigiDiaS).

METHODS

This protocol outlines the design of a multimethod prospective observational cohort study that includes data from electronic health records, self-reported questionnaires, clinical consultation field observations, and individual in-depth interviews with patients and diabetes health care personnel. All patients with type 1 diabetes at a designated outpatient clinic were invited to participate and use the digital PROM implemented in clinical care. Both users and nonusers of the digital PROM were eligible for the prospective study, allowing for a comparison of the two groups. Data were collected at baseline and after 12 months, including self-management as the primary outcome assessed using the Patient Activation Measure, along with the secondary outcomes of digital health literacy, quality of life, health economy, and clinical variables such as glycated hemoglobin.

RESULTS

The digital solution was implemented for routine clinical care in the department in November 2021, and data collection for the prospective study started in October 2022. As of September 6, 2023, 84.6% (186/220) of patients among those in the digital PROM and 15.5% (34/220) of patients among the nonusers have consented to participate. We expect the study to have enough participants by the autumn of 2023. With 1 year of follow-up, the results are expected by spring 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a multimethod prospective observational cohort study can offer valuable insights into the relevance, effectiveness, and acceptability of digital tools using PROMs in diabetes specialist care. Such knowledge is crucial for achieving broad and successful implementation and use of these tools in a large diabetes outpatient clinic.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/52766.

The effects of community interventions on unplanned healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the impact of community-based interventions for multimorbid patients on unplanned healthcare use. The prevalence of multimorbidity (co-existence of multiple chronic conditions) is rapidly increasing and affects one-third of the global population. Patients with multimorbidity have complex healthcare needs and greater unplanned healthcare usage. Community-based interventions allow for continued care of patients outside hospitals, but few studies have explored the effects of these interventions on unplanned healthcare usage.

DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library online databases were searched. Studies were screened and underwent risk of bias assessment. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis.

SETTING

Community-based interventions.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with multimorbidity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Unplanned healthcare usage.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies, including a total of 6148 participants, were included. All included studies came from high-income settings and had elderly populations. All studies measured emergency department attendances as their primary outcome. Risk of bias was generally low. Most community interventions were multifaceted with emphasis on education, self-monitoring of symptoms and regular follow-ups. Four studies looked at improved care coordination, advance care planning and palliative care. All 13 studies found a decrease in emergency department visits post-intervention with risk reduction ranging from 0 (95% confidencec interval [CI]: -0.37 to 0.37) to 0.735 (95% CI: 0.688-0.785).

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based interventions have potential to reduce emergency department visits in patients with multimorbidity. Identification of specific successful components of interventions was challenging given the overlaps between interventions. Policymakers should recognise the importance of community interventions and aim to integrate aspects of these into existing healthcare structures. Future research should investigate the impact of such interventions with broader participant characteristics.