Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Changing Paradigm for Its Evaluation

The qualitative experiences of otolaryngologists with genetic services in pediatric hearing loss evaluation

Genetic testing is one of the most high-yield diagnostic tests in the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss, leading to a genetic diagnosis in 40-65% of patients. Previous research has focused on the utility of genetic testing in pediatric SNHL and otolaryngologists' general understanding of genetics. This qualitative study examines otolaryngologists' perceptions about facilitators and barriers when ordering genetic testing in the workup of pediatric hearing loss. Potential solutions for overcoming barriers are also explored. Eleven (N = 11) semi-structured interviews were conducted with otolaryngologists in the USA. Most participants were currently practicing in a southern, academic, urban setting and had completed a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship. Insurance was one of the main barriers to testing, and increased genetics provider accessibility was the most frequently cited solution to increase utilization of genetic services. Difficulty acquiring insurance coverage and unfamiliarity with the genetic testing process were the most common reasons otolaryngologists referred patients to genetics clinics for genetic testing, as opposed to ordering testing themselves. This study suggests that otolaryngologists recognize the importance and utility of genetic testing, but a lack of genetics-specific skills, knowledge, and resources makes it difficult for them to facilitate testing. Multidisciplinary hearing loss clinics that include genetics providers may increase the overall accessibility of genetic services.

Single Versus Multigene Testing for Hereditary Hearing Loss: Use and Costs in a Commercially Insured Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to describe trends in single-gene GJB2/6 (connexin 26/30) and multigene hearing loss panel (HLP) testing for hereditary hearing loss using real-world evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study using insurance claims data.

SETTING

Optum Data Mart database from 2015 to 2020.

METHODS

Rates of overall and hearing-specific genetic testing and costs to insurers and patients were reported. Linear regression models were used to assess the proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing over time. Additional linear regression models were used to assess changes in costs over time.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2020, 91,986 children received genetic testing for any indication, of which 601 (0.65%) received hearing-specific tests. The proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained similar over time (mean difference [MD]: -1.3% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.3%, 1.7%), while multigene HLP use increased over time (MD: 4.0% per year; 95% CI: 0.4%, 7.5%). The median charge for single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained constant during the study period (MD: -$34; 95% CI: -$86, $18), while the median charge for multigene HLP decreased during the study period (MD: -$145 per year; 95% CI: -$278, -$12).

CONCLUSION

Compared to molecular testing for GJB2/6, HLPs are becoming more common for hereditary hearing loss. The comprehensiveness of HLP and decreasing costs provide justification for its more widespread adoption moving forward.

Comprehensive medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) should undergo a comprehensive medical evaluation to determine the underlying etiology and help guide treatment and counseling. In this article, we review the indications and rationale for medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral SNHL, including history and physical examination, imaging, genetic testing, specialist referrals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing, and other laboratory tests. Workup begins with a history and physical examination, which can provide clues to the etiology of SNHL, particularly with syndromic causes. If SNHL is diagnosed within the first 3 weeks of life, CMV testing should be performed to identify patients that may benefit from antiviral treatment. If SNHL is diagnosed after 3 weeks, testing can be done using dried blood spots samples, if testing capability is available. Genetic testing is oftentimes successful in identifying causes of hearing loss as a result of recent technological advances in testing and an ever-increasing number of identified genes and genetic mutations. Therefore, where available, genetic testing should be performed, ideally with next generation sequencing techniques. Ophthalmological evaluation must be done on all children with SNHL. Imaging (high-resolution computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) should be performed to assess for anatomic causes of hearing loss and to determine candidacy for cochlear implantation when indicated. Laboratory testing is indicated for certain etiologies, but should not be ordered indiscriminately since the yield overall is low.

First glance at the molecular etiology of hearing loss in French-Canadian families from Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean's founder population

The French-Canadian population of Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean is known for its homogenous genetic background. The hereditary causes of hearing loss were previously unexplored in this population. Individuals with hearing loss were referred from the otorhinolaryngology, pediatrics and family physicians' clinics to the medical genetics service at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean between June 2015 and March 2021. A regional clinical evaluation strategy was developed. Samples from 63 individuals belonging to 41 families were sent independently to different molecular clinical laboratories and index cases were analyzed through comprehensive multigene panels, with a diagnostic rate of 54%. Sixteen hearing loss causal variants were identified in 12 genes, with eight of these variants not been previously reported in the literature. Recurrent variants were present in four genes, suggesting a possible founder effect, while GJB2 gene variants were scarce. A comprehensive multigene panel approach as part of the proposed clinical evaluation strategy offers a high diagnostic yield for this population.

Evaluating parental genetic knowledge of hearing loss with and without pre-test genetic counseling in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic

This study evaluated parental knowledge of genetics of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and satisfaction following pre-test consult with and without genetic counseling (GC). A survey evaluating parents' knowledge of genetics for SNHL with and without GC was administered to parents of children with SNHL who were offered genetic testing. The survey also inquired about satisfaction, and decision to pursue genetic testing. Statistical tests included Fisher-Freeman-Halton test and Mann-Whitney test. Forty-nine participants completed the survey and were seen by both otolaryngology and GC intern (ENT + GC) (n = 24) or by otolaryngology (ENT) only (n = 25). Participation groups were not randomized. There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. Participants in the ENT + GC group had higher average genetics knowledge score of 72% correct (range 22%-100%), compared to the ENT only group with 44% (range 22%-78%) (p < .001). Participants in the ENT + GC group were more likely to know the different test result possibilities (p = .002), the most common form and pathogenic variant associated with SNHL (p < .001), that only a subset of genes are evaluated (p = .004), and that genetic testing may not explain SNHL etiology (p = .013), in comparison with the ENT only group. There was no significant difference in parental satisfaction or ultimate decision to undergo testing between groups. Obtaining genetic testing plays an integral role in the diagnosis and management of SNHL in the pediatric population. Our results suggest that the addition of GC increases parent knowledge of genetics and SNHL. This knowledge allows the family to make a more informed decision as to whether or not to pursue genetic testing.

Use of Diagnostic Testing and Intervention for Sensorineural Hearing Loss in US Children From 2008 to 2018

Importance

Early detection and intervention of pediatric hearing loss is critical for language development and academic achievement. However, variations in the diagnostic workup and management of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) exist.

Objective

To identify patient and clinician factors that are associated with variation in practice on a national level.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used the Optum claims database to identify 53 711 unique children with SNHL between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

National use rates and mean costs for diagnostic modalities (electrocardiogram, cytomegalovirus testing, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and genetic testing) and interventions (speech-language pathology, billed hearing aid services, and cochlear implant surgery) were reported. The associations of age, sex, SNHL laterality, clinician type, race/ethnicity, and household income with diagnostic workup and intervention use were measured in multivariable analyses.

Results

Of 53 711 patients, 23 735 (44.2%) were girls, 2934 (5.5%) were Asian, 3797 (7.1%) were Black, 5626 (10.5%) were Hispanic, 33 441 (62.3%) were White, and the mean (SD) age was 7.3 (5.3) years. Of all patients, 32 200 (60.0%) were seen by general otolaryngologists, while 7573 (14.10%) were seen by pediatric otolaryngologists. Diagnostic workup was received by 14 647 patients (27.3%), while 13 482 (25.1%) received intervention. Use of genetic testing increased (odds ratio, 1.22 per year; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24), whereas use of computed tomography decreased (odds ratio, 0.93 per year; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94) during the study period. After adjusting for relevant covariables, children who were seen by pediatric otolaryngologists and geneticists had the highest odds of receiving workup and intervention. Additionally, racial/ethnic and economic disparities were observed in the use of most modalities of diagnostic workup and intervention for pediatric SNHL.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study identified factors associated with disparities in the diagnostic workup and intervention of pediatric SNHL, thus highlighting the need for increased education and standardization in the management of this common sensory disorder.

Genetic and Non-genetic Workup for Pediatric Congenital Hearing Loss

Hearing loss is one of the most common concerns for presentation for a geneticist. Presentation prior to the age of one (congenital hearing loss), profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and bilateral hearing loss are sensitive and should raise concern for genetic causes of hearing loss and prompt referral for genetic testing. Genetic testing particularly in this instance offers the opportunity for anticipatory guidance including possible course of the hearing loss over time and also connection and evaluation for additional congenital anomalies that may be associated with an underlying syndrome vs. isolated genetic hearing loss.

The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review

As genetics becomes increasingly integrated into all areas of health care and the use of complex genetic tests continues to grow, the clinical genetics workforce will likely face greatly increased demand for its services. To inform strategic planning by health-care systems to prepare to meet this future demand, we performed a scoping review of the genetics workforce in high-income countries, summarizing all available evidence on its composition and capacity published between 2010 and 2019. Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PAIS, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and gray literature sources were searched, resulting in 162 unique studies being included in the review. The evidence presented includes the composition and size of the workforce, the scope of practice for genetics and nongenetics specialists, the time required to perform genetics-related tasks, case loads of genetics providers, and opportunities to increase efficiency and capacity. Our results indicate that there is currently a shortage of genetics providers and that there is a lack of consensus about the appropriate boundaries between the scopes of practice for genetics and nongenetics providers. Moreover, the results point to strategies that may be used to increase productivity and efficiency, including alternative service delivery models, streamlining processes, and the automation of tasks.

Diagnostic Yield of MRI for Sensorineural Hearing Loss - An Audit

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) of the head is frequently employed in investigations of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The yield of these studies is perceptibly low and seemingly at odds with the aims of wise resource allocation and risk reduction within the Canadian healthcare system. The purpose of our study was to audit the use and diagnostic yield of CEMRI for the clinical indication of SNHL in our institution and to identify characteristics that may be leveraged to improve yield and optimize resource utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of 500 consecutive patients who underwent CEMRI of internal auditory canal for SNHL were categorized as cases with relevant positive findings on CEMRI and those without relevant findings. Demographics, presenting symptoms, interventions and responses, ordering physicians, and investigations performed prior to CEMRI testing were recorded. Chi-squared test and t-test were used to compare proportions and means, respectively.

RESULTS

CEMRI studies revealed relevant findings in 20 (6.2%) of 324 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. Pre-CEMRI testing beyond audiometry was conducted in 35% of those with relevant positive findings compared to 7.3% of those without (p < 0.001). Auditory brainstem response/vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials were abnormal in 35% of those with relevant CEMRI findings compared to 6.3% of those without (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEMRI is a valuable tool for assessing potential causes of SNHL, but small diagnostic yield at present needs justification for contrast injection for this indication. Our findings suggest preferred referral from otolaryngologists exclusively, and implementation of a non-contrast MRI for SNHL may be a better diagnostic tool.

Medical Referral Patterns and Etiologies for Children With Mild-to-Severe Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

To (1) identify the etiologies and risk factors of the patient cohort and determine the degree to which they reflected the incidence for children with hearing loss and (2) quantify practice management patterns in three catchment areas of the United States with available centers of excellence in pediatric hearing loss.

DESIGN

Medical information for 307 children with bilateral, mild-to-severe hearing loss was examined retrospectively. Children were participants in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss (OCHL) study, a 5-year longitudinal study that recruited subjects at three different sites. Children aged 6 months to 7 years at time of OCHL enrollment were participants in this study. Children with cochlear implants, children with severe or profound hearing loss, and children with significant cognitive or motor delays were excluded from the OCHL study and, by extension, from this analysis. Medical information was gathered using medical records and participant intake forms, the latter reflecting a caregiver's report. A comparison group included 134 children with normal hearing. A Chi-square test on two-way tables was used to assess for differences in referral patterns by site for the children who are hard of hearing (CHH). Linear regression was performed on gestational age and birth weight as continuous variables. Risk factors were assessed using t tests. The alpha value was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Neonatal intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, oxygen requirement, aminoglycoside exposure, and family history were correlated with hearing loss. For this study cohort, congenital cytomegalovirus, strep positivity, bacterial meningitis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and loop diuretic exposure were not associated with hearing loss. Less than 50% of children underwent imaging, although 34.2% of those scanned had abnormalities identified. No single imaging modality was preferred. Differences in referral rates were apparent for neurology, radiology, genetics, and ophthalmology.

CONCLUSIONS

The OCHL cohort reflects known etiologies of CHH. Despite available guidelines, centers of excellence, and high-yield rates for imaging, the medical workup for children with hearing loss remains inconsistently implemented and widely variable. There remains limited awareness as to what constitutes appropriate medical assessment for CHH.

Genetic testing for congenital non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 60% of congenital pediatric hearing loss is of genetic etiology. To evaluate non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (NSSNHL), guidelines emphasize the use of comprehensive genetic testing (CGT) with next generation sequencing (NGS), yet these tests have limited accessibility, and potential CGT results may not be well understood. Thus, our objective was to analyze genetic testing practices and results for pediatric patients with NSSNHL.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients (<18 years) diagnosed with NSSNHL from 2014 to 2017 at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Demographics, clinical data, CGT results, genetic testing practices and referral patterns were recorded and descriptively analyzed. Logistic regression models identified patient characteristics associated with pathogenic variants (PV) and variants of unknown significance (VOUS).

RESULTS

430 patients with congenital NSSNHL were included in the study. Genetic testing was ordered for 28% (n = 122) and resulted for 16% (n = 68). Most of the ordered tests (89%, n = 109) were the CGT panel. A majority (62%, n = 97) of the time in which genetic testing was not ordered, a referral for genetics consultation was placed. Amongst those with CGT results, a definitive genetic etiology was identified in 25% (n = 13), with less than half due to variants of GJB2/6. At least one PV was identified for 33% (n = 18), while at least one VOUS for 93% (n = 51). There were no significant differences in PV presence or number of VOUS across any characteristic except race. When compared to Caucasians, African Americans had significantly higher rates of VOUS with a rate ratio and 95% CI of 1.61 [1.11-2.34], p = 0.01, and Asians trended towards higher rates (1.96 [0.95-4.05], p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

CGT is of high utility in the identification of relevant genetic variants and definitive genetic etiologies for pediatric patients with NSSNHL. Though guidelines recommend the early use of CGT, there are many barriers to appropriate testing and counseling, leading to low rates of CGT use at this single institution.

Navigating genetic diagnostics in patients with hearing loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the age of targeted genomic enrichment and massively parallel sequencing, there is no more efficient genetic testing method for the diagnosis of hereditary hearing loss. More clinical tests are on the market, which can make choosing good tests difficult.

RECENT FINDINGS

More and larger comprehensive genetic studies in patients with hearing loss have been published recently. They remind us of the importance of looking for both single nucleotide variation and copy number variation in all genes implicated in nonsyndromic hearing loss. They also inform us of how a patient's history and phenotype provide essential information in the interpretation of genetic data.

SUMMARY

Choosing the most comprehensive genetic test improves the chances of a genetic diagnosis and thereby impacts clinical care.

International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) consensus recommendations: Hearing loss in the pediatric patient

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for the workup of hearing loss in the pediatric patient.

METHODS

Expert opinion by the members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group.

RESULTS

Consensus recommendations include initial screening and diagnosis as well as the workup of sensorineural, conductive and mixed hearing loss in children. The consensus statement discusses the role of genetic testing and imaging and provides algorithms to guide the workup of children with hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

The workup of children with hearing loss can be guided by the recommendations provided herein.