Pediatric videonasoendoscopy for speech and voice evaluation

Analysis of speech characteristics in children with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) and children with phenotypic overlap without VCFS

OBJECTIVE

To address two questions of theoretical importance regarding the profile and course of communication impairment associated with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS): (1) do speech characteristics of children with VCFS differ from a group of children with some of the phenotypic characteristics of VCFS who do not have the syndrome, and (2) do younger children with VCFS demonstrate speech patterns that differ from older children with VCFS?

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study comparing two groups of children at two age levels.

PATIENTS

Thirteen children with VCFS and eight children with some of the phenotypic features of VCFS who did not have the syndrome. Children ranged in age from 3 to 10 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

(1) Broad phonetic transcription of speech yielding measures of number of consonant types, Percent Consonant Correct, and percentage of glottal stops used; and (2) composite ratings of velopharyngeal function made from perceptual, aerodynamic, and endoscopic evaluations.

RESULTS

Younger children with VCFS demonstrated greater speech impairment than older children with VCFS or the children without VCFS, such as smaller consonant inventories, greater number of developmental errors, greater severity of articulation disorder, and higher frequency of glottal stop use. The relationship between ratings of velopharyngeal function and the speech variables analyzed was not straightforward.

CONCLUSIONS

Some young children with VCFS demonstrated speech impairment that is qualitatively and quantitatively different from older children with VCFS or children without VCFS. This finding supports the hypothesis that some children with VCFS demonstrate a profile of speech production that is different from normal but also may be specific to the syndrome.

Medical and surgical treatment of pediatric dysphonia

The production of sound for communication is the last of the prime functions of the larynx, yet it is its most salient feature. Pediatric dysphonia may be caused by a variety of general causes. These causes may be classified as infectious, anatomic, congenital, inflammatory, neoplastic, neurologic, and iatrogenic. When a child presents with hoarseness, a complete assessment is necessary. Fine points during the history and physical may help distinguish between those pathologic conditions found in these general categories.

The evaluation of velopharyngeal function using flexible nasendoscopy

Nasendoscopy is an essential tool in assessing the dynamic function and structure of the velopharyngeal sphincter during speech and swallowing. Flexible fibre-optic nasendoscopy has been used by the cleft palate team at Withington Hospital, Manchester since 1989. Seventy-six patients were referred between 1989 and 1994 for evaluation of velopharyngeal function during speech. Flexible nasendoscopic evaluation was attempted in 50 patients, and successfully carried out in 43 patients. The age range was four years to 77 years (mean 21 years). The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisting of patients with cleft palate and Group 2 comprised of patients with non-overt cleft palate-related velopharyngeal dysfunction of various aetiologies; such as, submucous cleft, post-tonsillectomy, post-adenoidectomy, neurological and post-traumatic. Based on the findings on nasendoscopy, videofluoroscopy and clinical speech/voice analysis the following treatment options were recommended: 17 (40 per cent) for pharyngoplasty, five (11 per cent) for revision pharyngoplasty, 15 (35 per cent) for speech therapy, four for an obturator and one for tonsillectomy. Two previously undetected submucous clefts were diagnosed.

Voice disorders in children

Pediatric patients with voice or speech problems usually should receive a team assessment in which communication between the pediatrician or primary care physician, the otolaryngologist, and speech pathologist occurs. Although speech or voice problems may prompt an otolaryngologic evaluation, the voice or speech problem simply may be the manifestation or symptom of a larger or more complex disease process. Whether that is the case of hypernasal speech, eventually leading to the diagnosis of velocardiofacial syndrome, or bilateral vocal fold paralysis, eventually leading to the diagnosis of hydrocephalus, it is apparent that patients with speech or voice disorders may eventually require multidisciplinary evaluation. The outlook for children with speech and voice difficulties is better than ever. Recent equipment advances, such as flexible laryngoscopy, video stroboscopy, and nasometry, for detection, evaluation, and management of speech problems have created a better environment than ever existed for care of these problems. Much research is being performed in the area of pediatric voice and speech problems. The National Institute of Deafness and Communicative Disorders and the National Institute of Dental Research have funded and currently fund many projects in these areas. Many pediatric hospitals now have voice or speech disorder clinics in which multiple disciplines are brought together to evaluate children with these problems. Children benefit best when speech and voice problems are managed in an interdisciplinary setting when necessary and by professionals who have experience and training in these specialized pediatric problems. Given the local, professional, and national resources that are expended toward recognition and treatment of speech disorders in children, it is truly a tragedy when those resources cannot be brought to assist children with voice and speech problems. Although voice and speech problems usually are recognized by parents or concerned family members, this task may rest on the pediatrician or other primary caregiver.

The developing role of a paediatric voice clinic: a review of our experience

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience in developing a paediatric voice clinic within a tertiary otolaryngology department and describe the emerging role of this specialized clinic.

MATERIALS

Currently our referral base is divided between other otolaryngologists within our department who require voice assessment as part of the pre- or post-operative management of laryngeal disorders (e.g. cysts, webs, vocal fold palsies, laryngo-tracheal reconstruction) and other professionals within our hospital who require characterisation of voice within the broader task of defining medical conditions in which voice abnormalities exist (e.g. mucopolysaccharidoses, functional dysphonias).

METHODS

The patients were assessed by a team consisting of a paediatric laryngologist and a speech and language therapist. Each patient underwent a perceptual voice assessment and qualitative voice assessment using electrolaryngography. Direct visualisation was attempted and methods of and suitability for, such examination are discussed.

RESULTS

Our experience is reviewed and guidelines for the establishment of a paediatric voice clinic are presented.

Successful nasoendoscopic and aerodynamic examinations of children with speech/voice disorders

An 8-year retrospective analysis of aerodynamic and nasoendoscopic examinations of children with a variety of speech and voice disorders shows that these examinations can be completed with a high rate of success. Moreover, the examinations were achieved with relative ease in children as young as 2 years old. Several clinicians were involved in the examinations, illustrating the viability of the methods. It is suspected that the failures to complete the examinations relate more to the examiners' methods and skills than to the child's tolerance of the instrumentation.

Voice problems after pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: videolaryngostroboscopic, acoustic, and perceptual assessment

Children with laryngotracheal stenosis undergo laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) to permit tracheostomy decannulation. We conducted voice assessments of 8 pediatric LTR patients with voice problems. Perceptual ratings and acoustic measures were taken in 5 patients and videolaryngoscopy/laryngostroboscopy was conducted in all 8. Results of perceptual evaluation were abnormal for hoarseness, breathiness and pitch. Acoustic analysis revealed a markedly decreased fundamental frequency of phonation, diminished frequency range, decreased vocal intensity, and shortened maximum phonation time. Videolaryngostroboscopic findings are summarized as follows: 2 patients had severe glottal insufficiency, 3 patients had vocal fold asymmetry in stiffness and position, and 3 patients demonstrated phonation using supraglottal structures. Use of the stroboscope contributed to diagnosis in 3 of 8 patients. Reverse (inhalatory) phonation was observed in three patients. Concomitant articulation problems were exhibited frequently. Sentence production was shortened by the decreased phonatory duration. When coupled with the abnormal voice quality, speech intelligibility was significantly affected. Voice problems following decannulation were observed to persist as a long-term difficulty in some LTR patients.

Experience with surgical management of velopharyngeal incompetence

Accurate mapping of the defect of velopharyngeal closure in patients with velopharyngeal incompetence is paramount to the planning of an operative procedure that will have a successful outcome. Nasoendoscopy and videonasoendoscopy are valuable tools for examination of the abnormal pattern of velopharyngeal movement in patients with velopharyngeal incompetence. On the basis of the knowledge of the observed defect in velopharyngeal closure for the particular patient, a pharyngeal flap operation is planned. The flap width, level of placement of the flap base, and control of the lateral port size vary to suit each individual velopharyngeal closure defect. Postoperative speech results in 86 patients are reported.