Gabapentin for treatment of thalamic pain syndrome

Pharmacotherapy to Manage Central Post-Stroke Pain

Central post-stroke pain is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome following a cerebrovascular accident. The development of central post-stroke pain is estimated to occur in 8 to 55% of stroke patients and is described as constant or intermittent neuropathic pain accompanied by dysesthesia of temperature and/or pressure sensations. These pain and sensory deficits are within the area of the body corresponding to the stroke lesion. The onset of pain is usually gradual, though it can develop either immediately after stroke or years after. Given the diversity in its clinical presentation, central post-stroke pain is a challenging diagnosis of exclusion. Furthermore, central post-stroke pain is often resistant to pharmacological treatment options and a clear therapeutic algorithm has not been established. Based on current evidence, amitriptyline, lamotrigine, and gabapentinoids should be used as first-line pharmacotherapy options when central post-stroke pain is suspected. Other drugs, such as fluvoxamine, steroids, and Intravenous infusions of lidocaine, ketamine, or even propofol, can be considered in intractable cases. In addition, interventional therapies such as motor cortex stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation have been shown to provide relief in difficult-to-treat patients.

Pain anticipatory phenomena in patients with central poststroke pain: a magnetoencephalography study

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is characterized by hemianesthesia associated with unrelenting chronic pain. The final pain experience stems from interactions between sensory, affective, and cognitive components of chronic pain. Hence, managing CPSP will require integrated approaches aimed not only at the sensory but also the affective-cognitive spheres. A better understanding of the brain's processing of pain anticipation is critical for the development of novel therapeutic approaches that target affective-cognitive networks and alleviate pain-related disability. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize the neural substrates of pain anticipation in patients suffering from intractable CPSP. Simple visual cues evoked anticipation while patients awaited impending painful (PS), nonpainful (NPS), or no stimulus (NOS) to their nonaffected and affected extremities. MEG responses were studied at gradiometer level using event-related fields analysis and time-frequency oscillatory analysis upon source localization. On the nonaffected side, significantly greater responses were recorded during PS. PS (vs. NPS and NOS) exhibited significant parietal and frontal cortical activations in the beta and gamma bands, respectively, whereas NPS (vs. NOS) displayed greater activation in the orbitofrontal cortex. On the affected extremity, PS (vs. NPS) did not show significantly greater responses. These data suggest that anticipatory phenomena can modulate neural activity when painful stimuli are applied to the nonaffected extremity but not the affected extremity in CPSP patients. This dichotomy may stem from the chronic effects of pain on neural networks leading to habituation or saturation. Future clinically effective therapies will likely be associated with partial normalization of the neurophysiological correlates of pain anticipation.

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

PURPOSE

The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke.

METHODS

Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation and underlie this entire guideline. Without communication and coordination, isolated efforts to rehabilitate the stroke survivor are unlikely to achieve their full potential.

CONCLUSIONS

As systems of care evolve in response to healthcare reform efforts, postacute care and rehabilitation are often considered a costly area of care to be trimmed but without recognition of their clinical impact and ability to reduce the risk of downstream medical morbidity resulting from immobility, depression, loss of autonomy, and reduced functional independence. The provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resources, dose, and duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priority in these redesign efforts. (Stroke.2016;47:e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.).

Touch me not

Central Poststroke Pain syndrome (CPSP) can occur due to disruption of the somatosensory pathways of the brain at any level such as the thalamus, medulla, or cerebral cortex. It is characterized by sensory abnormalities and hyperesthesia in the part of the body correlating to the central lesion. The treatment of this pain syndrome is often difficult, and it does not usually respond to traditional analgesics. The first line of treatment is drugs aimed at lowering neuronal hyperexcitability, for example, amitriptyline or lamotrigine, with gabapentin considered a second line.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Central Post-Stroke Pain

OBJECTIVES

Almost 100 years after the first report of the thalamic syndrome, the scientific basis for the treatment of central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is remarkably small. Therefore, the authors aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of CPSP.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature on the pharmacologic treatment of CPSP. All studies and case series were included and evaluated according to their level of evidence. Only CPSP was considered, not other types of central pain.

RESULTS

Amitriptyline and lamotrigine are the only oral drugs proven to be effective in the treatment of CPSP in a placebo-controlled study. IV drugs such as lidocaine, propofol, and ketamine have shown efficacy for short-term control of CPSP, but their application and potential side effects make them unsuitable for long-term treatment. The novel antiepileptic drug gabapentin has been reported to control CPSP in a few patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Amitriptyline, lamotrigine, and gabapentin provide a more favorable efficacy and safety profile than the classic antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin, for which no placebo-controlled evidence of efficacy was found. Clinical trials are urgently needed to optimize pharmacologic treatment of CPSP.

Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain

This paper reviews the pharmacology and clinical effectiveness of gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Gabapentin has antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic properties but does not have significant actions as an anti-nociceptive agent. Its mechanisms of action appear to be a complex synergy between increased GABA synthesis, non-NMDA receptor antagonism and binding to the alpha2delta subunit of voltage dependent calcium channels. The latter action inhibits the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Clinically, several large randomized controlled trials have demonstrated its effectiveness in the treatment of a variety of neuropathic pain syndromes. Patients with neuropathic pain can expect a mean reduction in pain score of 2.05 points on an 11 point numerical rating scale compared with a reduction of 0.94 points if they had taken the placebo. Around 30% of patients can expect to achieve more than 50% pain relief and a similar number will also experience minor adverse events; the most common of which are somnolence and dizziness. In patients with neuropathic pain due to cancer, higher response rates might be observed with gabapentin when administered with opioids because of a synergistic interaction.

Strategies for optimizing antiepileptic drug therapy in elderly people

The elderly take more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than all other adults. This extensive use directly correlates with an increased prevalence of epilepsy in a growing population of older people, as well as other neuropsychiatric conditions such as neuropathic pain and behavioral disorders associated with dementia and for which AEDs are administered. The agents account for nearly 10% of all adverse drug reactions in the elderly and are the fourth leading cause of adverse drug reactions in nursing home residents. Numerous factors associated with advanced age contribute to the high frequency of untoward drug effects in this population; however, strategies are available to ensure optimal outcomes.