1
|
Kero J, Koivisto JM, Kuusisto A, Kesonen P, Haavisto E. Nursing interventions for dyspnoea management among inpatients with cancer in palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs 2024; 30:87-98. [PMID: 38407153 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.2.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyspnoea, a commonly reported symptom among patients with cancer, necessitates the need for appropriate non-pharmacological interventions for its management and suitable assessment scales. AIMS To explore the nursing interventions and assessment scales for managing dyspnoea in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. METHODS Systematic review. Five databases (CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched, and seven studies were identified. Only studies that comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials or quasi-experimental settings were included. FINDINGS Nursing interventions, that support a patient's physical breathing and mental functioning, are effective in managing dyspnoea. It is crucial to use both subjective and physical assessment methods to accurately measure the outcomes of these interventions. CONCLUSION These interventions have been proven to be effective, with outcomes centred on changes in physiological measurements and patients' subjective expressions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Kero
- PhD Candidate, Department of Nursing Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jaana-Maija Koivisto
- Associate Professor, Department of Health Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anne Kuusisto
- Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Wellbeing Services County, Satakunta, Satasairaala Central Hospital Pori, Finland
| | - Pauliina Kesonen
- PhD Candidate, Department of Health Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Elina Haavisto
- Professor, Department of Health Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Pirkanmaa Wellbeing Services County, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kako J, Morikawa M, Kobayashi M, Kanno Y, Kajiwara K, Nakano K, Matsuda Y, Shimizu Y, Hori M, Niino M, Suzuki M, Shimazu T. Nursing support for breathlessness in patients with cancer: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075024. [PMID: 37827741 PMCID: PMC10582874 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify nursing support provided for the relief of breathlessness in patients with cancer. DESIGN A scoping review following a standard framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. STUDY SELECTION Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Ichushi-Web of the Japan Medical Abstract Society Databases) were searched from inception to 31 January 2022. Studies reporting on patients with cancer (aged ≥18 years), intervention for relief from breathlessness, nursing support and quantitatively assessed breathlessness using a scale were included. RESULTS Overall, 2629 articles were screened, and 27 were finally included. Results of the qualitative thematic analysis were categorised into 12 nursing support components: fan therapy, nurse-led intervention, multidisciplinary intervention, psychoeducational programme, breathing technique, walking therapy, inspiratory muscle training, respiratory rehabilitation, yoga, acupuncture, guided imagery and abdominal massage. CONCLUSIONS We identified 12 components of nursing support for breathlessness in patients with cancer. The study results may be useful to understand the actual state of nursing support provided for breathlessness in patients with terminal cancer and to consider possible support that can be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Kako
- Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Miharu Morikawa
- Palliative Nursing, Course of Advanced Nursing Sciences, Department of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Kobayashi
- Graduate of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kanno
- Graduate School of Health Care Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Kajiwara
- Faculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kimiko Nakano
- Clinical Research Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Tokushima University Hospital, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoichi Shimizu
- School of Nursing, National College of Nursing, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Megumi Hori
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Shizuoka, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mariko Niino
- Center for Cancer Registries, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center Japan, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miho Suzuki
- Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University-Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Taichi Shimazu
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drury A, Goss J, Afolabi J, McHugh G, O’Leary N, Brady AM. A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service. EVALUATION REVIEW 2023; 47:820-870. [PMID: 37014066 PMCID: PMC10492442 DOI: 10.1177/0193841x231162402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires (n = 10), medical record audit (n = 14) and a post-discharge interview (n = 8). Caregivers (n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to (n = 2) and delivery of (n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Drury
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Julie Goss
- Our Lady’s Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jide Afolabi
- Our Lady’s Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Norma O’Leary
- Our Lady’s Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Brady
- Trinity Centre Practice & Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Volpato E, Farver-Vestergaard I, Brighton LJ, Peters J, Verkleij M, Hutchinson A, Heijmans M, von Leupoldt A. Nonpharmacological management of psychological distress in people with COPD. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:32/167/220170. [PMID: 36948501 PMCID: PMC10032611 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0170-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Psychological distress is prevalent in people with COPD and relates to a worse course of disease. It often remains unrecognised and untreated, intensifying the burden on patients, carers and healthcare systems. Nonpharmacological management strategies have been suggested as important elements to manage psychological distress in COPD. Therefore, this review presents instruments for detecting psychological distress in COPD and provides an overview of available nonpharmacological management strategies together with available scientific evidence for their presumed benefits in COPD. Several instruments are available for detecting psychological distress in COPD, including simple questions, questionnaires and clinical diagnostic interviews, but their implementation in clinical practice is limited and heterogeneous. Moreover, various nonpharmacological management options are available for COPD, ranging from specific cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to multi-component pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes. These interventions vary substantially in their specific content, intensity and duration across studies. Similarly, available evidence regarding their efficacy varies significantly, with the strongest evidence currently for CBT or PR. Further randomised controlled trials are needed with larger, culturally diverse samples and long-term follow-ups. Moreover, effective nonpharmacological interventions should be implemented more in the clinical routine. Respective barriers for patients, caregivers, clinicians, healthcare systems and research need to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Volpato
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
- Shared first authorship
| | | | - Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jeannette Peters
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Verkleij
- Department of Paediatric Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stefan MS, Knee AB, Ready A, Rastegar V, Burgher Seaman J, Gunn B, Shaw E, Bannuru RR. Efficacy of models of palliative care delivered beyond the traditional physician-led, subspecialty consultation service model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:bmjspcare-2021-003507. [PMID: 35440488 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of non-physician provider-led palliative care (PC) interventions in the management of adults with advanced illnesses on patient-reported outcomes and advance care planning (ACP). METHODS We included randomised trials and cluster trials published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov searched until July 2021 that examined individuals ≥18 years with a diagnosis of advanced, life-limiting illness and received a PC intervention led by a non-physician (nurse, advance practitioner or social worker). Our primary outcome was quality of life (QOL), which was extracted as unadjusted or adjusted estimates and measures of variability. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression and ACP. RESULTS Among the 21 studies (2370 subjects), 13 included patients with cancer, 3 with heart failure, 4 with chronic respiratory disease and 1 with chronic kidney disease. The interventions were diverse and varied with respect to team composition and services offered. For QOL, the standardised mean differences suggested null effects of PC interventions compared with usual care at 1-2 months (0.04; 95% CI=-0.14 to 0.23, n=10 randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) and 6-7 months (0.10; 95% CI=-0.15 to 0.34, n=6 RCTs). The results for anxiety and depression were not significant also. For the ACP, there was a strong benefit for the PC intervention (absolute increase of 0.32% (95% CI=0.06 to 0.57). CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis, PC interventions delivered by non-physician were not associated with improvement in QOL, anxiety or depression but demonstrated an impact on the ACP discussion and documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela S Stefan
- Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander B Knee
- Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, Office of Research, Baystate Medical Ctr, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Audrey Ready
- Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vida Rastegar
- Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, Office of Research, Baystate Medical Ctr, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Burgher Seaman
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bridget Gunn
- Library & Knowledge Services, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ehryn Shaw
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raveendhara R Bannuru
- Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bernhardt V, Stickford JL, Bhammar DM, Balmain BN, Babb TG. Repeatability of dyspnea measurements during exercise in women with obesity. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2021; 297:103831. [PMID: 34922000 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
While the 0-10 Borg scale to rate perceived breathlessness (RPB) is widely used to assess dyspnea on exertion, the repeatability of RPB in women with obesity is unknown. We examined the repeatability of RPB in women with obesity during submaximal constant-load cycling following at least 10 weeks of normal daily life. Seventeen women (37 ± 7 yr; 34.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2) who rated their breathlessness as 3 on the Borg scale (i.e., "moderate") during 60 W submaximal cycling repeated the same test following 19 ± 9 weeks of normal living. Mean body weight (93.8 ± 16.1 vs. 93.6 ± 116.8 kg, p = 0.94) and RPB (3.0 ± 0.0 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.80) did not differ between pre- and post-normal living periods. We demonstrate that subjective ratings of breathlessness are repeatable for the majority of subjects and can be used to accurately assess DOE during submaximal constant-load cycling in women with obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bryce N Balmain
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tony G Babb
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Howell D. Enabling patients in effective self-management of breathlessness in lung cancer: the neglected pillar of personalized medicine. Lung Cancer Manag 2021; 10:LMT52. [PMID: 34899992 PMCID: PMC8656340 DOI: 10.2217/lmt-2020-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, engagement of patients in the self management of disease and symptom problems has become a health policy priority to improve health outcomes in cancer. Unfortunately, little attention has been focused on the provision of self-management support (SMS)in cancer and specifically for complex cancer symptoms such as breathlessness. Current management of breathlessness, which includes treatment of underlying disease, pharmacological agents to address comorbidities and opiates and anxiolytics to change perception and reduce the sense of breathing effort, is inadequate. In this perspective paper, we review the rationale and evidence for a structured, multicomponent SMS program in breathlessness including four components: breathing retraining, enhancing positive coping skills, optimizing exertional capacity and reducing symptom burden and health risks. The integration of SMS in routine lung cancer care is essential to improve breathlessness, reduce psychological distress, suffering and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Howell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Campbell ML, Donesky D, Sarkozy A, Reinke LF. Treatment of Dyspnea in Advanced Disease and at the End of Life. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2021; 23:406-420. [PMID: 33883525 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Dyspnea is a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations, varies in intensity, and can only be known through the patient's report. Dyspnea is akin to suffocation and is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced illness and at the end of life. Common approaches to dyspnea management, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, breathing strategies, or supplemental oxygen, have become accepted through pragmatic use or because studies do not include dyspnea as a measured outcome. Patients and clinicians urgently need evidence-based treatments to alleviate this frightening symptom. To fill this gap, a group of dyspnea researchers with expertise to conduct a literature review of evidence-based interventions for dyspnea in patients with serious illness produced these guidelines. We present the evidence from the strongest recommendations for practice to the weakest recommendations and include practical considerations for clinical nurses.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hui D, Bohlke K, Bao T, Campbell TC, Coyne PJ, Currow DC, Gupta A, Leiser AL, Mori M, Nava S, Reinke LF, Roeland EJ, Seigel C, Walsh D, Campbell ML. Management of Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1389-1411. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide guidance on the clinical management of dyspnea in adult patients with advanced cancer. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) systematic review provided the evidence base for nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to alleviate dyspnea. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with a concurrent comparison group published through early May 2020. The ASCO Expert Panel also wished to address dyspnea assessment, management of underlying conditions, and palliative care referrals, and for these questions, an additional systematic review identified RCTs, systematic reviews, and guidelines published through July 2020. RESULTS The AHRQ systematic review included 48 RCTs and two retrospective cohort studies. Lung cancer and mesothelioma were the most commonly addressed types of cancer. Nonpharmacologic interventions such as fans provided some relief from breathlessness. Support for pharmacologic interventions was limited. A meta-analysis of specialty breathlessness services reported improvements in distress because of dyspnea. RECOMMENDATIONS A hierarchical approach to dyspnea management is recommended, beginning with dyspnea assessment, ascertainment and management of potentially reversible causes, and referral to an interdisciplinary palliative care team. Nonpharmacologic interventions that may be offered to relieve dyspnea include airflow interventions (eg, a fan directed at the cheek), standard supplemental oxygen for patients with hypoxemia, and other psychoeducational, self-management, or complementary approaches. For patients who derive inadequate relief from nonpharmacologic interventions, systemic opioids should be offered. Other pharmacologic interventions, such as corticosteroids and benzodiazepines, are also discussed. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hui
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kari Bohlke
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Ting Bao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Arjun Gupta
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Aliza L. Leiser
- Rutgers RWJ Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Masanori Mori
- Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Stefano Nava
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater University, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gupta A, Sedhom R, Sharma R, Zhang A, Waldfogel JM, Feliciano JL, Day J, Gersten RA, Davidson PM, Bass EB, Dy SM. Nonpharmacological Interventions for Managing Breathlessness in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:290-298. [PMID: 33211072 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Breathlessness is a frequent and debilitating symptom in patients with advanced cancer. Often, in the context of breathlessness, aggressive cancer treatment is not beneficial, feasible, or aligned with goals of care. Targeted symptom-focused interventions may be helpful in this scenario. Objective To evaluate the advantages and harms of nonpharmacological interventions for managing breathlessness in adults with advanced cancer. Evidence Review PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through May 2020 for published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), nonrandomized controlled trials, and observational studies of the advantages and/or harms of nonpharmacological interventions on alleviating breathlessness in adults with advanced cancer. Only English-language studies were screened for eligibility, titles, abstracts, and full text. Risk of bias and strength of evidence (SOE) were independently assessed. The key outcomes reported in studies were breathlessness, anxiety, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and harms. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. Findings A total of 29 RCTs (2423 participants) were included. These RCTs evaluated various types of interventions, such as respiratory (9 RCTs), activity and rehabilitation (7 RCTs), behavioral and psychoeducational (3 RCTs), integrative medicine (4 RCTs), and multicomponent (6 RCTs). Several nonpharmacological interventions were associated with improved breathlessness, including fan therapy (standardized mean difference [SMD], -2.09; 95% CI, -3.81 to -0.37; I2 = 94.3%; P for heterogeneity = .02; moderate SOE) and bilevel ventilation (estimated slope difference, -0.58; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.23; low SOE), lasting for a few minutes to hours, in the inpatient setting. In the outpatient setting, nonpharmacological interventions associated with improved breathlessness were acupressure and reflexology (integrative medicine) (low SOE) and multicomponent interventions (combined activity and rehabilitation, behavioral and psychoeducational, and integrative medicine) (low SOE) lasting for a few weeks to months. Five of the 29 RCTs (17%) reported adverse events, although adverse events and study dropouts were uncommon. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this review include the safety and association with improved breathlessness of several nonpharmacological interventions for adults with advanced cancer. Guidelines and clinical practice should evolve to incorporate nonpharmacological interventions as first-line treatment for adults with advanced cancer and breathlessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Gupta
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ramy Sedhom
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ritu Sharma
- Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Allen Zhang
- Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Julie M Waldfogel
- Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Josephine L Feliciano
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeff Day
- Department of Art as Applied to Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rebecca A Gersten
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Eric B Bass
- Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sydney M Dy
- Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haidl P, Jany B, Geiseler J, Andreas S, Arzt M, Dreher M, Frey M, Hauck RW, Herth F, Hämäläinen N, Jehser T, Kenn K, Lamprecht B, Magnet F, Oldenburg O, Schenk P, Schucher B, Studnicka M, Voshaar T, Windisch W, Woehrle H, Worth H. [Guideline for Long-Term Oxygen Therapy - S2k-Guideline Published by the German Respiratory Society]. Pneumologie 2020; 74:813-841. [PMID: 33291162 DOI: 10.1055/a-1252-1492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Long-term oxygen therapy is of great importance both for reducing mortality and for improving performance in patients with chronic lung diseases. The prerequisites for Long-term oxygen therapy are adequate diagnostics and clearly defined indication. A causal distinction into chronic hypoxaemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure is reasonable, from which the differential indication for non-invasive ventilation results.The revised guideline covers the diagnostics and indication of chronic lung and heart diseases, the role of oxygen in terminal illness and gives a detailed description of available oxygen devices. The guideline is intended to help avoid undersupply, oversupply and false prescriptions. Furthermore, the chapter "Postacute Oxygen Therapy" discusses the procedure, relevant in everyday life, but not yet clearly defined, for prescribing oxygen therapy for the home at the end of an inpatient stay. Another important point, the correct prescription of mobile oxygen systems, is also presented in the guideline. This document is a revised version of the guideline for longterm oxygen therapy and replaces the version of 2008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Haidl
- Fachkrankenhaus Kloster Grafschaft GmbH, Abteilung Pneumologie II, Schmallenberg
| | - B Jany
- Klinikum Würzburg Mitte (KWM), Klinik für Innere Medizin, Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Standort MissioKlinik, Würzburg
| | - J Geiseler
- Klinikum Vest, Medizinische Klinik IV: Pneumologie, Beatmungs- und Schlafmedizin, Marl
| | - S Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Immenhausen
| | - M Arzt
- Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Regensburg
| | - M Dreher
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Klinik für Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Aachen
| | - M Frey
- Klinik Barmelweid, Rombach, Schweiz
| | - R W Hauck
- Klinikum Altötting, Klinik für Pneumologie, Beatmungs- und Schlafmedizin, Altötting
| | - F Herth
- Thoraxklinik, Abteilung für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | | | - T Jehser
- Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Palliativstation, Berlin
| | - K Kenn
- Philips Universität Marburg, Lehrstuhl für pneumologische Rehabilitation, Marburg
| | - B Lamprecht
- Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Med Campus III, Linz, Österreich
| | - F Magnet
- Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit - Department für Humanmedizin, Köln
| | - O Oldenburg
- Clemenshospital, Klinik für Kardiologie, Münster
| | - P Schenk
- Landesklinikum Hochegg, Abteilung für Pulmologie, Grimmenstein, Österreich
| | - B Schucher
- LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Großhansdorf
| | - M Studnicka
- Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Universitätsklinikum der PMU, Universitätsklinik für Pneumologie, Salzburg, Österreich
| | - T Voshaar
- Krankenhaus Bethanien Lungenzentrum, Medizinische Klinik III, Moers
| | - W Windisch
- Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Universität Witten-Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit - Department für Humanmedizin, Köln
| | | | - H Worth
- Facharztzentrum Fürth, Fürth
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hashimoto H, Kanda K. Development and validation of the Total Dyspnea Scale for Cancer Patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 41:120-125. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
13
|
Bausewein C, Schumacher P, Bolzani A. Integrated breathlessness services for people with chronic conditions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019; 12:227-231. [PMID: 29927755 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Optimal management of breathlessness requires generally more than one component. Breathlessness services aim to provide specific interventions and support for patients suffering from breathlessness due to any advanced disease and their carers. This review aims to describe recent studies evaluating the effects of breathlessness services for patients with advanced chronic conditions. RECENT FINDINGS Various breathlessness services have been tested and vary regarding structure, duration, frequency and professionals involved. Four randomized controlled trials demonstrated a positive and significant effect on distress due to breathlessness or mastery of breathlessness or breathlessness severity. In the fifth randomized controlled trial, quantitative results were NS, but in the qualitative interviews, patients stressed the positive experience with the breathlessness service and the benefits they gained. The caring, holistic, respectful and integrated approaches were valued by patients. SUMMARY Breathlessness services combine a variety of evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions and some services also pharmacological interventions when physicians are involved. As the prevalence of breathlessness due to advanced disease is high and increasing, more such services should be provided to support patients throughout the course of their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, München, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maddocks M, Brighton LJ, Farquhar M, Booth S, Miller S, Klass L, Tunnard I, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Higginson IJ. Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom of many advanced diseases, affecting around 2 million people in the UK. Breathlessness increases with disease progression and often becomes chronic or refractory. Breathlessness-triggered services that integrate holistic assessment and specialist palliative care input as part of a multiprofessional approach have been developed for this group, offering tailored interventions to support self-management and reduce distress.
Objectives
The aim was to synthesise evidence on holistic breathlessness services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness. The objectives were to describe the structure, organisation and delivery of services, determine clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability, identify predictors of treatment response, and elicit stakeholders’ evidence-based priorities for clinical practice, policy and research.
Design
The mixed-methods evidence synthesis comprised three components: (1) a systematic review to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of holistic breathlessness services; (2) a secondary analysis of pooled individual data from three trials to determine predictors of clinical response; and (3) a transparent expert consultation (TEC), comprising a stakeholder workshop and an online consensus survey, to identify stakeholders’ priorities.
Results
Thirty-seven papers reporting on 18 holistic breathlessness services were included in the systematic review. Most studies enrolled people with thoracic cancer, were delivered over 4–6 weeks, and included breathing training, relaxation techniques and psychological support. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) distress due to breathlessness, significant reductions in the Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS) depression scores, and non-significant reductions in the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery and HADS anxiety, favouring the intervention. Recipients valued education, self-management interventions, and expertise of the staff in breathlessness and person-centred care. Evidence for cost-effectiveness was limited and inconclusive. The responder analysis (n = 259) revealed baseline CRQ mastery and NRS distress to be strong predictors of the response to breathlessness services assessed by these same measures, and no significant influence from baseline breathlessness intensity, patient diagnosis, lung function, health status, anxiety or depression. The TEC elicited 34 priorities from stakeholders. Seven priorities received high agreement and consensus, reflecting stakeholders’ (n = 74) views that services should be person-centred and multiprofessional, share their breathlessness management skills with others, and recognise the roles and support needs of informal carers.
Limitations
The evidence synthesis draws predominantly from UK services and may not be generalisable to other settings. Some meta-analyses were restricted by reporting biases and statistical heterogeneity.
Conclusions
Despite heterogeneity in composition and delivery, holistic breathlessness services are highly valued by recipients and can lead to significant improvements in the distress caused by breathlessness and depression. Outcomes of improved mastery and reduced distress caused by breathlessness are not influenced by patient diagnosis, lung function or health status. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved access to person-centred, multiprofessional breathlessness services and support for informal carers.
Future work
Our research suggests that key therapeutic components of holistic breathlessness services be considered in clinical practice and models of delivery and educational strategies to address stakeholders’ priorities tested.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017057508.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery programme. Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao and Irene J Higginson are supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London; Matthew Maddocks is supported by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-009), William D-C Man is supported by the NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London and Irene J Higginson holds a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator Award.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lara Klass
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - William D-C Man
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Patients with COPD and their families experience a range of stresses and suffering from a variety of sources throughout the disease's progression. COPD is the fourth leading cause of death in the world. It exists as a significant contributor to global morbidity and mortality, and it results in substantial economic and social burden. This review provides some key facts regarding disease burden and encourages clinician to familiarize themselves and use both conventional and palliative approach early in the disease progression for a better quality of life.
Collapse
|
16
|
Booth S, Moffat C, Farquhar M, Higginson IJ, Burkin J. Developing A Breathlessness Intervention Service for Patients with Palliative and Supportive Care Needs, irrespective of Diagnosis. J Palliat Care 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/082585971102700106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Booth
- S Booth (corresponding author) University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College, London, UK, and Addenbrookes Palliative Care Team, Elsworth House, Box 63, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK CB2
| | | | - Morag Farquhar
- General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy, and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Julie Burkin
- Addenbrookes Palliative Care Team, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maddocks M, Reilly CC, Jolley C, Higginson IJ. What Next in Refractory Breathlessness? Breathlessness? Research Questions for Palliative Care. J Palliat Care 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/082585971403000405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Maddocks
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Charles C. Reilly
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Jolley
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brighton LJ, Miller S, Farquhar M, Booth S, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2018; 74:270-281. [PMID: 30498004 PMCID: PMC6467249 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breathlessness is a common, distressing symptom in people with advanced disease and a marker of deterioration. Holistic services that draw on integrated palliative care have been developed for this group. This systematic review aimed to examine the outcomes, experiences and therapeutic components of these services. METHODS Systematic review searching nine databases to June 2017 for experimental, qualitative and observational studies. Eligibility and quality were independently assessed by two authors. Data on service models, health and cost outcomes were synthesised, using meta-analyses as indicated. Data on recipient experiences were synthesised thematically and integrated at the level of interpretation and reporting. RESULTS From 3239 records identified, 37 articles were included representing 18 different services. Most services enrolled people with thoracic cancer, involved palliative care staff and comprised 4-6 contacts over 4-6 weeks. Commonly used interventions included breathing techniques, psychological support and relaxation techniques. Meta-analyses demonstrated reductions in Numeric Rating Scale distress due to breathlessness (n=324; mean difference (MD) -2.30, 95% CI -4.43 to -0.16, p=0.03) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores (n=408, MD -1.67, 95% CI -2.52 to -0.81, p<0.001) favouring the intervention. Statistically non-significant effects were observed for Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery (n=259, MD 0.23, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.55, p=0.17) and HADS anxiety scores (n=552, MD -1.59, 95% CI -3.22 to 0.05, p=0.06). Patients and carers valued tailored education, self-management interventions and expert staff providing person-centred, dignified care. However, there was no observable effect on health status or quality of life, and mixed evidence around physical function. CONCLUSION Holistic services for chronic breathlessness can reduce distress in patients with advanced disease and may improve psychological outcomes of anxiety and depression. Therapeutic components of these services should be shared and integrated into clinical practice. REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017057508.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - William D-C Man
- NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, Harefield, UK.,Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Booth S, Chin C, Spathis A, Maddocks M, Yorke J, Burkin J, Moffat C, Farquhar M, Bausewein C. Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in people with cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/23809000.2018.1524708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Booth
- Associate Lecturer University of Cambridge, Cambridge Breathlessness Intervention Service (CBIS), Cambridge, UK
| | - Chloe Chin
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Camden, Islington, ELiPSE and UCLH & HCA
| | | | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Janelle Yorke
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julie Burkin
- Associate Lecturer University of Cambridge, Cambridge Breathlessness Intervention Service (CBIS), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Palliativmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bayly J, Wakefield D, Hepgul N, Wilcock A, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Changing health behaviour with rehabilitation in thoracic cancer: A systematic review and synthesis. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1675-1694. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Bayly
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation; King's College London; London UK
| | - Dominique Wakefield
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation; King's College London; London UK
| | - Nilay Hepgul
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation; King's College London; London UK
| | - Andrew Wilcock
- University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham UK
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation; King's College London; London UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation; King's College London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
To cope with cancer and its treatment-related side effects and toxicities, people are increasingly using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Consequently, integrative oncology, which combines conventional therapies and evidence-based CAM practices, is an emerging discipline in cancer care. The use of yoga as a CAM is proving to be beneficial and increasingly gaining popularity. An electronic database search (PubMed), through December 15, 2016, revealed 138 relevant clinical trials (single-armed, nonrandomized, and randomized controlled trials) on the use of yoga in cancer patients. A total of 10,660 cancer patients from 20 countries were recruited in these studies. Regardless of some methodological deficiencies, most of the studies reported that yoga improved the physical and psychological symptoms, quality of life, and markers of immunity of the patients, providing a strong support for yoga's integration into conventional cancer care. This review article presents the published clinical research on the prevalence of yoga's use in cancer patients so that oncologists, researchers, and the patients are aware of the evidence supporting the use of this relatively safe modality in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ram P Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Adi Maroko-Afek
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Maeda T, Hayakawa T. Corticosteroids for alleviating dyspnea in patients with terminal cancer. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2017.1392674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Maeda
- Department of Pharmacy, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, 1-1-1, Takaki-cho, Kasugai, Aichi 486-8510, Japan
| | - Toru Hayakawa
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, Hokkaido Pharmaceutical University School of Pharmacy, 7-15-4-1 Maeda, Teine, Sapporo Hokkaido 006-8590, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Aristodemou PA, Speck PW. Palliative care service in Cyprus, a population-based needs assessment based on routine mortality data. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2017.1361627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pansemni A. Aristodemou
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation (PAA, PWS), King’s College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| | - Peter W. Speck
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation (PAA, PWS), King’s College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hunter EG, Gibson RW, Arbesman M, D'Amico M. Systematic Review of Occupational Therapy and Adult Cancer Rehabilitation: Part 1. Impact of Physical Activity and Symptom Management Interventions. Am J Occup Ther 2017; 71:7102100030p1-7102100030p11. [PMID: 28218585 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2017.023564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This article is the first part of a systematic review of evidence for the effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation interventions within the scope of occupational therapy that address the activity and participation needs of adult cancer survivors. This article focuses on the importance of physical activity and symptom management. Strong evidence supports the use of exercise for cancer-related fatigue and indicates that lymphedema is not exacerbated by exercise. Moderate evidence supports the use of yoga to relieve anxiety and depression and indicates that exercise as a whole may contribute to a return to precancer levels of sexual activity. The results of this review support inclusion of occupational therapy in cancer rehabilitation and reveal a significant need for more research to explore ways occupational therapy can positively influence the outcomes of cancer survivors. Part 2 of the review also appears in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G Hunter
- Elizabeth G. Hunter, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington;
| | - Robert W Gibson
- Robert W. Gibson, PhD, MS, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor and Director of Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Marian Arbesman
- Marian Arbesman, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Consultant, Evidence-Based Practice Project, American Occupational Therapy Association, Bethesda, MD; President, ArbesIdeas, Inc., Williamsville, NY; and Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Mariana D'Amico
- Mariana D'Amico, EdD, OTR/L, BCP, FAOTA, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Froggatt K, Corner J, Bredin M. Dissemination and utilization of an intervention to manage breathlessness: Letting go or letting down? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/136140960200700311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The relationship between research and practice development has not always been a close one. Researchers focus upon the production of new knowledge to create the evidence base upon which the development of practice is taken forward, usually by other people within the clinical area. Work being undertaken at the Macmillan Practice Development Unit (MPDU) in London about the dissemination and utilisation of evidence concerning the management of breathlessness has raised a number of issues. These concern the confidence of practitioners to take on new approaches within the practice sphere, their desire for accredited education, and questions about responsibility for, and ownership of, the dissemination process. Different values about the nature of learning are explored here, which may explain the dissonance between practitioner and researcher expectations about the dissemination and utilisation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Froggatt
- Macmillan Practice Development Unit, The Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Studies, The Institute o f Caner Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - Jessica Corner
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Plant H, Bredin M, Krishnasamy M, Corner J. Working with resistance, tension and objectivity: Conducting a randomised controlled trial of a nursing intervention for breathlessness. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/136140960000500606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
It is vital that nurses wishing to recommend or introduce new strategies are able to provide supporting evidence that is acceptable to their colleagues. The methodology from which to derive such evidence remains to be clearly defined, as the research process is complex, demanding and, to a certain extent, uncharted. This paper examines the experience of nurses collaborating in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial which evaluated a nursing intervention for the management of breathlessness in patients with lung cancer. The study raised several important methodological issues: resistance among colleagues to innovative nursing practice; the difficulty of measuring well-being in patients whose physical condition is deteriorating; maintaining uniformity of practice within a diverse group of collaborating nurse researchers; and the tension between the nursing role and the necessity of an ethically demanding research design. Analysis of the process of conducting a randomised controlled trial produced valuable insights which indicated the kind of support required to undertake research and successfully implement a new intervention into clinical practice. The study also highlighted the problems associated with asking ill people to complete standard measurement tools, particularly when such instruments might not be sensitive to the reality of the patient(s) problem, in this case, the experience of breathlessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Plant
- Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London
| | - Mary Bredin
- Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Macmillan practice Development unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London
| | - Meinir Krishnasamy
- Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Macmillan practice Development unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London
| | - Jessica Corner
- Centre of Cancer and Palliative Care studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reilly CC, Bausewein C, Pannell C, Moxham J, Jolley CJ, Higginson IJ. Patients' experiences of a new integrated breathlessness support service for patients with refractory breathlessness: Results of a postal survey. Palliat Med 2016; 30:313-22. [PMID: 26311570 PMCID: PMC4778380 DOI: 10.1177/0269216315600103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed a new single point of access to integrated palliative care, respiratory medicine and physiotherapy: the breathlessness support service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness. This study aimed to describe patients' experiences of the service and identify the aspects valued. DESIGN We attempted to survey all patients who had attended and completed the 6-week breathlessness support service intervention by sending them a postal questionnaire to self-complete covering experience, composition, effectiveness of the BSS and about participation in research. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of free text comments. RESULTS Of the 70 postal questionnaires sent out, 25 (36%) returned. A total of 21 (84% (95% confidence interval: 69%-98%)) responding patients reported that they definitely found the breathlessness support service helpful and 13 (52% (95% confidence interval: 32%-72%)) rated the breathlessness support service as excellent. A total of 21 (84% (95% confidence interval: 69%-98%)) patients reported that the breathlessness support service helped with their management of their breathlessness along with additional symptoms and activities (e.g. mood and mobility). Four key themes were identified: (1) personalised care, (2) caring nature of the staff, (3) importance of patient education to empower patients and (4) effectiveness of context-specific breathlessness interventions. These were specific aspects that patients valued. CONCLUSION Patients' satisfaction with the breathlessness support service was high, and identified as important to this was a combination of personalised care, nature of staff, education and empowerment, and use of specific interventions. These components would be important in any future breathlessness service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C Reilly
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK Department for Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Caty Pannell
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Moxham
- Department of Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline J Jolley
- Department of Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Johnson MJ, Kanaan M, Richardson G, Nabb S, Torgerson D, English A, Barton R, Booth S. A randomised controlled trial of three or one breathing technique training sessions for breathlessness in people with malignant lung disease. BMC Med 2015; 13:213. [PMID: 26345362 PMCID: PMC4562360 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0453-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 90 % of patients with intra-thoracic malignancy experience breathlessness. Breathing training is helpful, but it is unknown whether repeated sessions are needed. The present study aims to test whether three sessions are better than one for breathlessness in this population. METHODS This is a multi-centre randomised controlled non-blinded parallel arm trial. Participants were allocated to three sessions or single (1:2 ratio) using central computer-generated block randomisation by an independent Trials Unit and stratified for centre. The setting was respiratory, oncology or palliative care clinics at eight UK centres. Inclusion criteria were people with intrathoracic cancer and refractory breathlessness, expected prognosis ≥3 months, and no prior experience of breathing training. The trial intervention was a complex breathlessness intervention (breathing training, anxiety management, relaxation, pacing, and prioritisation) delivered over three hour-long sessions at weekly intervals, or during a single hour-long session. The main primary outcome was worst breathlessness over the previous 24 hours ('worst'), by numerical rating scale (0 = none; 10 = worst imaginable). Our primary analysis was area under the curve (AUC) 'worst' from baseline to 4 weeks. All analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS Between April 2011 and October 2013, 156 consenting participants were randomised (52 three; 104 single). Overall, the 'worst' score reduced from 6.81 (SD, 1.89) to 5.84 (2.39). Primary analysis [n = 124 (79 %)], showed no between-arm difference in the AUC: three sessions 22.86 (7.12) vs single session 22.58 (7.10); P value = 0.83); mean difference 0.2, 95 % CIs (-2.31 to 2.97). Complete case analysis showed a non-significant reduction in QALYs with three sessions (mean difference -0.006, 95 % CIs -0.018 to 0.006). Sensitivity analyses found similar results. The probability of the single session being cost-effective (threshold value of £20,000 per QALY) was over 80 %. CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence that three sessions conferred additional benefits, including cost-effectiveness, over one. A single session of breathing training seems appropriate and minimises patient burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry: ISRCTN; TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN49387307; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN49387307 ; registration date: 25/01/2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam J Johnson
- Hull York Medical School, Hertford Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
| | - Mona Kanaan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
| | | | - Samantha Nabb
- Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Anne English
- Dove House Hospice, Hull, UK. .,Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Willerby, UK.
| | | | - Sara Booth
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Palliative Care Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, Cooper B, Evans A, Freeman D, Green A, Hippolyte S, Knowles V, MacNee W, McDonnell L, Pye K, Suntharalingam J, Vora V, Wilkinson T. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 2015; 70 Suppl 1:i1-43. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
30
|
Farquhar MC, Prevost AT, McCrone P, Brafman-Price B, Bentley A, Higginson IJ, Todd C, Booth S. Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 2014; 12:194. [PMID: 25358424 PMCID: PMC4222435 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-014-0194-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breathlessness is common in advanced cancer. The Breathlessness Intervention Service (BIS) is a multi-disciplinary complex intervention theoretically underpinned by a palliative care approach, utilising evidence-based non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions to support patients with advanced disease. We sought to establish whether BIS was more effective, and cost-effective, for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care. METHODS A single-centre Phase III fast-track single-blind mixed-method randomised controlled trial (RCT) of BIS versus standard care was conducted. Participants were randomised to one of two groups (randomly permuted blocks). A total of 67 patients referred to BIS were randomised (intervention arm n = 35; control arm n = 32 received BIS after a two-week wait); 54 completed to the key outcome measurement. The primary outcome measure was a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale for patient distress due to breathlessness at two-weeks. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Client Services Receipt Inventory, EQ-5D and topic-guided interviews. RESULTS BIS reduced patient distress due to breathlessness (primary outcome: -1.29; 95% CI -2.57 to -0.005; P = 0.049) significantly more than the control group; 94% of respondents reported a positive impact (51/53). BIS reduced fear and worry, and increased confidence in managing breathlessness. Patients and carers consistently identified specific and repeatable aspects of the BIS model and interventions that helped. How interventions were delivered was important. BIS legitimised breathlessness and increased knowledge whilst making patients and carers feel 'not alone'. BIS had a 66% likelihood of better outcomes in terms of reduced distress due to breathlessness at lower health/social care costs than standard care (81% with informal care costs included). CONCLUSIONS BIS appears to be more effective and cost-effective in advanced cancer than standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION RCT registration at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00678405 (May 2008) and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04119516 (December 2008).
Collapse
|
31
|
Sigurdardottir KR, Oldervoll L, Hjermstad MJ, Kaasa S, Knudsen AK, Løhre ET, Loge JH, Haugen DF. How are palliative care cancer populations characterized in randomized controlled trials? A literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014; 47:906-914.e17. [PMID: 24018205 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Revised: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 06/14/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The difficulties in defining a palliative care patient accentuate the need to provide stringent descriptions of the patient population in palliative care research. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic literature review with the aim of identifying which key variables have been used to describe adult palliative care cancer populations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS The data sources used were MEDLINE (1950 to January 25, 2010) and Embase (1980 to January 25, 2010), limited to RCTs in adult cancer patients with incurable disease. Forty-three variables were systematically extracted from the eligible articles. RESULTS The review includes 336 articles reporting RCTs in palliative care cancer patients. Age (98%), gender (90%), cancer diagnosis (89%), performance status (45%), and survival (45%) were the most frequently reported variables. A large number of other variables were much less frequently reported. CONCLUSION A substantial variation exists in how palliative care cancer populations are described in RCTs. Few variables are consistently registered and reported. There is a clear need to standardize the reporting. The results from this work will serve as the basis for an international Delphi process with the aim of reaching consensus on a minimum set of descriptors to characterize a palliative care cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Sunniva Centre for Palliative Care, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Line Oldervoll
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Røros Rehabilitation Centre, Røros, Norway
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Regional Centre for Excellence in Palliative Care, South Eastern Norway, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Kari Knudsen
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erik Torbjørn Løhre
- Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jon Håvard Loge
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; National Resource Centre for Late Effects After Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kako J, Sakai T. The study of recognition of non-pharmacological interventions provided by nurses of palliative care units for dyspnea in terminally ill cancer patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.2512/jspm.9.2_101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Kako
- School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo
| | - Tomoko Sakai
- School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roulston A, Wilkinson P, Haynes T, Campbell J. Complementary therapy: perceptions of older people with lung or colorectal cancer. Int J Palliat Nurs 2013; 19:333-9. [PMID: 24273810 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.7.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM To explore how older people with lung and colorectal cancer view registered complementary therapy (CT) services in Northern Ireland. BACKGROUND A literature review highlighted gaps around information, access, and communication between patients and health professionals regarding CT services. METHODS Using structured interviews, a survey of 68 patients in one hospital and one hospice was conducted in Belfast, Northern Ireland. RESULTS All respondents felt that CT services should be better promoted and more easily accessible to older people with cancer. Some patients were concerned about the lack of written information provided regarding CT services, which they believed led to poorer uptake and uncertainty regarding the potential benefits. Others were concerned that engaging in or disclosing CT usage might negatively affect existing relationships with medical professionals. CONCLUSION Patients should be offered high quality written information on CT services to enable choice, improve knowledge, and promote wider access. Increased physician education may facilitate provision of such information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Roulston
- School of Sociology, Social Policy & Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bausewein C, Booth S, Gysels M, Higginson IJ. WITHDRAWN: Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD005623. [PMID: 24272974 PMCID: PMC6564079 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005623.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
This review is now out of date although it is correct as of the date of publication [Issue 2, 2008]. The authors are developing a new protocol which will replace this review. Publication of the protocol is expected in 2014, and serves to update the existing review and incorporate the latest evidence into a new Cochrane Review. The latest version of this review (available in 'Other versions' tab on The Cochrane Library) may still be useful to readers until the new review is published. In 2016, the replacement review titled 'Non‐pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non‐malignant diseases' was deregistered and split into four separate reviews of individual interventions: Respiratory interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Physical interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Cognitive‐emotional interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases; Multi‐dimensional interventions for breathlessness in adults with advanced diseases. At September 2020, these replacement titles were deregistered (Multi‐dimensional interventions) or the protocols withdrawn (Cognitive‐emotional interventions; Multi‐dimensional interventions; Respiratory interventions) as they did not meet Cochrane standards or expectations. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, Kings College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London, UK, SE5 9PJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Patients with lung cancer have high mortality and high morbidity. Lung cancer-related symptoms and problems such as dyspnea, fatigue, pain, and cachexia that begin in the early phase later result in poor physical functioning, psychosocial, and quality of life status. In addition, advancing age is associated with significant comorbidity. These patients may benefit from multidisciplinary therapy to reduce the perceived severity of dyspnea and fatigue and increase physical functioning and quality of life. Based on management of symptoms and problems such as dyspnea, physical inactivity, cancer-related fatigue, respiratory secretions, pain, and anxiety–depression of these patients, it is thought that physiotherapy techniques can be used on advanced lung cancer patients following a comprehensive evaluation. However, well-designed, prospective, and randomized-controlled trials are needed to prove the efficacy of physiotherapy and pulmonary rehabilitation in general for patients with advanced lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevgi Ozalevli
- Dokuz Eylul University, School of Physical Therapy and Re-habilitation, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schofield P, Ugalde A, Gough K, Reece J, Krishnasamy M, Carey M, Ball D, Aranda S. A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology 2013; 22:2445-53. [PMID: 23733720 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Revised: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 04/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. METHODS A randomised controlled trial design was used. The tailored intervention comprised two sessions at treatment commencement and completion. Sessions included a self-completed needs assessment, active listening, self-care education and communication of unmet psychosocial and symptom needs to the multidisciplinary team for management and referral. Outcomes were assessed with the Needs Assessment for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer and European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Q-C30 V2.0. RESULTS One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of inoperable lung or pleural cancer (including mesothelioma) were recruited from a specialist facility before the trial closed prematurely (original target 200). None of the primary contrasts of interest were significant (all p > 0.10), although change score analysis indicated a relative benefit from the intervention for unmet symptom needs at 8 and 12 weeks post-assessment (effect size = 0.55 and 0.40, respectively). CONCLUSION Although a novel approach, the hypothesis that the intervention would benefit perceived unmet needs, psychological morbidity, distress and health-related quality of life was not supported overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; School of Behavioural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; School of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wood H, Connors S, Dogan S, Peel T. Individual experiences and impacts of a physiotherapist-led, non-pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy: a qualitative study. Palliat Med 2013; 27:499-507. [PMID: 23128902 DOI: 10.1177/0269216312464093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-pharmacological breathlessness management programmes have been shown to be beneficial in the management of lung cancer-related dyspnoea for more than 10 years. What is not so clear is how they work. AIM To evaluate how patients with intrathoracic malignancy (lung cancer or pleural mesothelioma) undergoing the non-pharmacological breathlessness management programmes benefited from the programme, using a qualitative methodology. DESIGN AND SETTING Consecutive patients completing the programme were invited to be interviewed (semi-structured and audio-recorded) about their experiences of the programme, what had helped them and how. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS Nine patients were interviewed. Seven major themes emerged, they are summarised as follows: (1) Mixed prior expectations of the programme, (2) flexibility of delivery and additional support needs, (3) physiotherapist attributes and skills in developing an effective helping relationship, (4) adoption of new techniques, (5) the effects and impact of the programme and new techniques, (6) difficulties and barriers to achieving change and (7) facing an uncertain future beyond the programme. CONCLUSION The non-pharmacological breathlessness management programme appears to offer a wide range of benefits to patients, including improving functional capacity, coping strategies and self-control. Such benefits are most likely to be due to a combination of breathing control, activity management and the therapist qualities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Wood
- Department of Clinical Psychology, North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Simoff MJ, Lally B, Slade MG, Goldberg WG, Lee P, Michaud GC, Wahidi MM, Chawla M. Symptom Management in Patients With Lung Cancer. Chest 2013; 143:e455S-e497S. [DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
39
|
Coughlan M. End of Life Care. Lung Cancer 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118702857.ch8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
40
|
Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Küffner R. Effects of Psycho-Oncologic Interventions on Emotional Distress and Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:782-93. [PMID: 23319686 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 496] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer. Methods Literature databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that compared a psycho-oncologic intervention delivered face-to face with a control condition. The main outcome measures were emotional distress, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Outcomes were evaluated for three time periods: post-treatment, ≤ 6 months, and more than 6 months. We applied standard meta-analytic techniques to analyze both published and unpublished data from the retrieved studies. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were used to explore reasons for heterogeneity. Results We retrieved 198 studies (covering 22,238 patients) that report 218 treatment-control comparisons. Significant small-to-medium effects were observed for individual and group psychotherapy and psychoeducation. These effects were sustained, in part, in the medium term (≤ 6 months) and long term (> 6 months). Short-term effects were evident for relaxation training. Studies that preselected participants according to increased distress produced large effects at post-treatment. A moderator effect was found for the moderator variable “duration of the intervention,” with longer interventions producing more sustained effects. Indicators of study quality were often not reported. Small-sample bias indicative of possible publication bias was found for some effects, particularly with individual psychotherapy and relaxation training. Conclusion Various types of psycho-oncologic interventions are associated with significant, small-to-medium effects on emotional distress and quality of life. These results should be interpreted with caution, however, because of the low quality of reporting in many of the trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Faller
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Schuler
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Richard
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Heckl
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roland Küffner
- Hermann Faller, Michael Schuler, Matthias Richard, and Roland Küffner, University of Würzburg, Würzburg; and Ulrike Heckl and Joachim Weis, Tumor Biology Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liu W, Pan YL, Gao CX, Shang Z, Ning LJ, Liu X. Breathing exercises improve post-operative pulmonary function and quality of life in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2013; 5:1194-1200. [PMID: 23599740 PMCID: PMC3628798 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous research has shown that breathing exercises may improve the prognosis and health status in patients with lung cancer by enhancing pulmonary function and quality of life (QOL). However, individually published results are inconclusive. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical value of breathing exercises on post-operative pulmonary function and QOL in patients with lung cancer. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, the Web of Science and CBM databases was conducted from their inception through to October 2012. Crude standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of breathing exercises. A total of eight clinical studies were ultimately included with 398 lung cancer patients. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was a significant difference between the pre-intervention and post-intervention results of breathing exercises on post-operative pulmonary function; forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1): SMD, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.97–4.77; P<0.001; FEV1/FVC: SMD, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.15–3.39; P=0.032). Furthermore, the QOL in patients with lung cancer was significantly improved following the intervention with breathing exercises; there were significant differences between the pre-intervention and post-intervention results on the ability of self-care in daily life (SMD, −1.00; 95% CI, −1.467 to −0.52; P<0.001), social activities (SMD, −0.94; 95% CI, −1.73 to −0.15; P=0.02), symptoms of depression (SMD, −0.91; 95% CI, −1.25 to −0.57; P<0.001) and symptoms of anxiety (SMD, −0.91; 95% CI, −1.20 to −0.63; P<0.001). Results from the present meta-analysis suggest that breathing exercises may significantly improve post-operative pulmonary function and QOL in patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Departments of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110032, P.R. China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ellis J, Wagland R, Tishelman C, Williams ML, Bailey CD, Haines J, Caress A, Lorigan P, Smith JA, Booton R, Blackhall F, Molassiotis A. Considerations in developing and delivering a nonpharmacological intervention for symptom management in lung cancer: the views of patients and informal caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 44:831-42. [PMID: 22672922 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.12.274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2011] [Revised: 11/29/2011] [Accepted: 12/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Few studies consider patient's and caregiver's preferences when developing nonpharmacological interventions. This is important to develop acceptable and accessible nonpharmacological interventions for patients with cancer. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to identify the views of patients with lung cancer and their informal caregivers on the desirable components of a novel nonpharmacological intervention for the management of the symptom cluster of cough, breathlessness, and fatigue, and their needs and preferences regarding uptake and delivery of the intervention. METHODS This study was qualitative in orientation, using semistructured interviews and framework analysis to elicit the views of 37 patients with lung cancer and 23 caregivers regarding the issues that were perceived to be important regarding the development and delivery of a nonpharmacological intervention. RESULTS A number of key issues were identified that carried important implications for patient participation and adherence to the intervention, including the perceived relevance of potential techniques; appreciable benefits in the short term; convenience; variation in patient preferences; timing of the intervention; venue; caregiver involvement; the provider of the intervention, and contact with other patients. CONCLUSION The data from this study have provided insight into the key issues that are likely to influence the development, uptake, and delivery of a nonpharmacological intervention to help manage the respiratory symptom cluster of cough, breathlessness, and fatigue. It is crucial that these findings are considered when developing and modeling a nonpharmacological symptom management intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackie Ellis
- Academic Palliative and Supportive Care Studies Group, Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bausewein C, Jolley C, Reilly C, Lobo P, Kelly J, Bellas H, Madan P, Panell C, Brink E, De Biase C, Gao W, Murphy C, McCrone P, Moxham J, Higginson IJ. Development, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new out-patient Breathlessness Support Service: study protocol of a phase III fast-track randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med 2012; 12:58. [PMID: 22992240 PMCID: PMC3517322 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom affecting many patients with advanced disease both from malignant and non-malignant origin. A combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures is necessary to treat this symptom successfully. Breathlessness services in various compositions aim to provide comprehensive care for patients and their carers by a multiprofessional team but their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness have not yet been proven. The Breathlessness Support Service (BSS) is a newly created multiprofessional and interdisciplinary outpatient service at a large university hospital in South East London. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of this multidisciplinary out–patient BSS for the palliation of breathlessness, in advanced malignant and non-malignant disease. Methods The BSS was modelled based on the results of qualitative and quantitative studies, and systematic literature reviews. A randomised controlled fast track trial (RCT) comprising two groups: 1) intervention (immediate access to BSS in addition to standard care); 2) control group (standard best practice and access to BSS after a waiting time of six weeks). Patients are included if suffering from breathlessness on exertion or at rest due to advanced disease such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF), interstitial lung disease (ILD) or motor neurone disease (MND) that is refractory to maximal optimised medical management. Both quantitative and qualitative outcomes are assessed in face to-face interviews at baseline, after 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is patients' improvement of mastery of breathlessness after six weeks assessed on the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ). Secondary outcomes for patients include breathlessness severity, symptom burden, palliative care needs, service use, and respiratory measures (spirometry). For analyses, the primary outcome, mastery of breathlessness after six weeks, will be analysed using ANCOVA. Selection of covariates will depend on baseline differences between the groups. Analyses of secondary outcomes will include patients’ symptom burden other than breathlessness, physiological measures (lung function, six minute walk distance), and caregiver burden. Discussion Breathlessness services aim to meet the needs of patients suffering from this complex and burdensome symptom and their carers. The newly created BSS is different to other current services as it is run in close collaboration of palliative medicine and respiratory medicine to optimise medical care of patients. It also involves professionals from various medical, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work background. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01165034)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bausewein
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Occupational therapy interventions for breathlessness at the end of life. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2012; 6:138-43. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e3283537d0e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Roulston A, Bickerstaff D, Haynes T, Rutherford L, Jones L. A pilot study to evaluate an outpatient service for people with advanced lung cancer. Int J Palliat Nurs 2012; 18:225-33. [DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.5.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Roulston
- Queen's University Belfast, School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, 6 College Park, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
| | | | | | - Lesley Rutherford
- Palliative Care, Marie Curie Cancer Care/Queen's University Belfast/Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, London
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yorke J, Brettle A, Molassiotis A. Nonpharmacological interventions for managing respiratory symptoms in lung cancer. Chron Respir Dis 2012; 9:117-29. [PMID: 22452974 DOI: 10.1177/1479972312441632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with lung cancer experience significant symptom burden, particularly symptoms of a respiratory nature. Such symptom burden can be distressing for patients and negatively impact their functional status and quality of life. The aim of this review is to evaluate studies of nonpharmacological and noninvasive interventions for the management of respiratory symptoms experienced by patients with lung cancer. In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and included 1383 participants of which 1296 were lung cancer patients. The most frequently assessed and reported symptom was breathlessness (n = 9 studies). Cough and haemoptysis were reported in one study. A variety of outcome measurement tools were used and a broad range of intervention strategies evaluated. Lack of consistency between studies impinged on the ability to combine studies. It is not possible to draw any firm conclusion as to the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for the management of respiratory symptoms in lung cancer. Nonpharmacological interventions may well have an important role to play in the management of some of the respiratory symptoms (or combinations of respiratory symptoms), but more work of higher quality is necessary in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle Yorke
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Considerations in developing and delivering a non-pharmacological intervention for symptom management in lung cancer: the views of health care professionals. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20:2565-74. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1362-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2011] [Accepted: 12/26/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
48
|
Comprehensive Management of Respiratory Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 10:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2011] [Revised: 05/26/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
49
|
Pohl G, Marosi C, Dieckmann K, Goldner G, Elandt K, Hassler M, Schemper M, Strasser-Weippl K, Nauck F, Gaertner J, Watzke H. Evaluation of diagnostic and treatment approaches towards acute dyspnea in a palliative care setting among medical students at the University of Vienna. Wien Med Wochenschr 2012; 162:18-28. [DOI: 10.1007/s10354-011-0046-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2011] [Accepted: 12/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
50
|
Thomas S, Bausewein C, Higginson I, Booth S. Breathlessness in cancer patients – Implications, management and challenges. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2011; 15:459-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Revised: 11/26/2010] [Accepted: 11/30/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|