Adjunctive metformin for antipsychotic-related hyperprolactinemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The Association between Vitamin D Status and the Impact of Metformin on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis Activity in Women with Subclinical Hypothyroidism

Metformin inhibits enhanced secretion of anterior pituitary hormones. Its impact on prolactin and gonadotropin concentrations is absent in individuals with hypovitaminosis D. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate whether vitamin D status determines the effect of metformin on hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis activity in levothyroxine-naïve women. The study included three groups of women of reproductive age with subclinical non-autoimmune hypothyroidism, which were matched for age, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration, and insulin sensitivity: untreated women with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency (group A), women effectively supplemented with exogenous calciferol (group B), and untreated women with normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (25OHD) (group C). Owing to concomitant type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, all subjects were treated with metformin. Concentrations of 25OHD, TSH, total and free thyroid hormones, glucose, insulin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), prolactin, and peripheral markers of thyroid hormone action were assayed before metformin treatment and six months later. Based on hormone concentration, structure parameters of thyroid homeostasis were calculated. Except for 25OHD concentrations, there were no between-group differences in baseline values of the measured variables. Metformin reduced glucose, the homeostatic model assessment 1 of insulin resistance ratio (HOMA1-IR), and HbA1c in all study group, but these effects were less pronounced in group A than in the remaining groups. The reduction in TSH and Jostel's index was observed only in groups B and C, and its degree correlated with baseline TSH concentrations, baseline 25OHD concentrations, and the degree of improvement in HOMA1-IR. The drug did not affect circulating levels of 25OHD, free and total thyroid hormones, prolactin, other structure parameters of thyroid homeostasis, and markers of thyroid hormone action. The obtained results allow us to conclude that low vitamin D status in young women mitigates the impact of metformin on thyrotroph secretory function.

Autoimmune Thyroiditis Mitigates the Effect of Metformin on Plasma Prolactin Concentration in Men with Drug-Induced Hyperprolactinemia

Metformin inhibits the secretory function of overactive anterior pituitary cells, including lactotropes. In women of childbearing age, this effect was absent if they had coexisting autoimmune (Hashimoto) thyroiditis. The current study was aimed at investigating whether autoimmune thyroiditis modulates the impact of metformin on the plasma prolactin concentration in men. This prospective cohort study included two groups of middle-aged or elderly men with drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, namely subjects with concomitant Hashimoto thyroiditis (group A) and subjects with normal thyroid function (group B), who were matched for baseline prolactin concentration and insulin sensitivity. Titers of thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin antibodies, levels of C-reactive protein, markers of glucose homeostasis, concentrations of pituitary hormones (prolactin, thyrotropin, gonadotropins, and adrenocorticotropic hormone), free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, testosterone, and insulin growth factor-1 were measured before and six months after treatment with metformin. Both study groups differed in titers of both antibodies and concentrations of C-reactive protein. The drug reduced the total and monomeric prolactin concentration only in group B, and the impact on prolactin correlated with the improvement in insulin sensitivity and systemic inflammation. There were no differences between the follow-up and baseline levels of the remaining hormones. The results allow us to conclude that autoimmune thyroiditis mitigates the impact of metformin on prolactin secretion in men.

Treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Background

Hyperprolactinemia is a common antipsychotic-induced adverse event in psychiatric patients, and the quality of clinical studies investigating the best treatments has varied. Thus, to better summarize the clinical evidence, we performed an umbrella review of overlapping systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia.

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE were searched, and reviews and meta-analyses meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Relevant data were extracted, and an umbrella review was conducted of all included meta-analyses. The quality of included meta-analyses was assessed by using PRISMA scores and AMSTAR 2 quality evaluation. Finally, the clinical evidence for appropriate treatments was summarized and discussed.

Results

Five meta-analyses published between 2013 and 2020 met the requirements for inclusion in this umbrella review. The PRISMA scores of the included meta-analyses ranged from 19.5-26. AMSTAR 2 quality evaluation showed that 2 of the 5 included meta-analyses were of low quality and 3 were of very low quality. The included meta-analyses provide clinical evidence that adding aripiprazole or a dopamine agonist can effectively and safely improve antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Two meta-analyses also showed that adjunctive metformin can reduce serum prolactin level, but more clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Conclusion

Adjunctive dopamine agonists have been proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. Among the researched treatments, adding aripiprazole may be the most appropriate.

Impaired Prolactin-Lowering Effects of Metformin in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

The effect of metformin on prolactin concentration seems to be sex-dependent. The aim of this study was to determine whether the androgen status modulates the impact of metformin on plasma prolactin levels in women. This study included two matched groups of prediabetic women with hyperprolactinemia: 25 with PCOS and 25 control subjects with androgen levels within the reference range and with normal ovarian morphology. Glucose homeostasis markers, prolactin, the remaining anterior pituitary hormones, sex hormones, SHBG and IGF-1 were determined before and after six months of metformin treatment. At baseline, both groups differed in LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, FAI, DHEA-S, androstenedione and estradiol. Although metformin improved insulin sensitivity and increased SHBG in both study groups, these effects were more pronounced in control subjects than in women with PCOS. In control subjects, the drug decreased total and monomeric prolactin and increased LH. In women with PCOS, metformin reduced LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone and FAI. In the control group, the impact on total and monomeric prolactin positively correlated with their baseline levels and with the degree of improvement in insulin sensitivity, as well as negatively correlated with testosterone and FAI. In women with PCOS, treatment-induced changes in testosterone and FAI positively correlated with the changes in LH and LH/FSH ratio. The obtained results suggest that the prolactin-lowering properties of metformin are less pronounced in women with coexisting PCOS than in women with elevated prolactin levels, probably owing to the increased production of endogenous testosterone.

Metformin attenuates the production and proliferative effects of prolactin induced by medroxyprogesterone acetate during fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer

Background

Progestin is used for fertility-sparing treatment in cases of endometrial cancer (EC). Progestin can induce hyperprolactinemia by increasing pituitary secretion and endometrial decidualization. However, progestin induces prolactin (PRL) secretion, which stimulates cell proliferation and deleteriously affects treatment. To date, the detrimental effect of PRL, the secretion of which is induced by medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) during fertility-sparing treatment, has not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effects of PRL on EC cells during combined treatment with progestin and metformin.

Methods

In total, 71 patients with EC/endometrial atypical hyperplasia who underwent fertility-sparing treatment at our institution from 2009–2019 were enrolled. Serum PRL levels were determined using enzyme immunoassays; mRNA levels in endometrial tissues were determined using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR. To evaluate MPA-induced decidualization, cancer-associated stromal cells were enzymatically released from surgically removed specimens of six patients with EC. To examine PRL-induced cell proliferation, the EC cell lines Ishikawa, HEC1B, and HEC265 were used. In vitro cell proliferation was evaluated using the WST assay; protein levels of signaling molecules were determined using western blotting.

Results

MPA administration significantly increased serum PRL levels at 3 and 6 months and upregulated IGFBP-1 and PRL mRNA expression in tissues at 3 months of fertility-sparing treatment. Metformin significantly reduced MPA-induced IGFBP-1 and PRL mRNA expression during fertility-sparing treatment and significantly inhibited the upregulation of IGFBP-1 and PRL mRNA and PRL levels due to decidualization induced by MPA and cAMP treatment in primary cultured EC stromal cells. In vitro, PRL increased cell proliferation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation levels, whereas metformin attenuated these increases.

Conclusions

MPA upregulated PRL levels in serum and endometrial tissues during fertility-sparing treatment. Metformin co-administration reduced PRL production and attenuated PRL-induced cell-proliferation activity. This study may provide valuable insights on the application of metformin to improve the outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09858-w.

Pharmacological treatment strategies for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia (AP-induced HPRL) occurs overall in up to 70% of patients with schizophrenia, which is associated with hypogonadism and sexual dysfunction. We summarized the latest evidence for the benefits of prolactin-lowering drugs. We performed network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and applied Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation frameworks (GRADE) to rate the certainty of evidence, categorize interventions, and present the findings. The search identified 3,022 citations, 31 studies of which with 1999 participants were included in network meta-analysis. All options were not significantly better than placebo among patients with prolactin (PRL) less than 50 ng/ml. However, adjunctive aripiprazole (ARI) (5 mg: MD = -64.26, 95% CI = -87.00 to -41.37; 10 mg: MD = -59.81, 95% CI = -90.10 to -29.76; more than 10 mg: MD = -68.01, 95% CI = -97.12 to -39.72), switching to ARI in titration (MD = -74.80, 95% CI = -134.22 to -15.99) and adjunctive vitamin B6 (MD = -91.84, 95% CI = -165.31 to -17.74) were associated with significant decrease in AP-induced PRL among patients with PRL more than 50 ng/ml with moderated (adjunctive vitamin B6) to high (adjunctive ARI) certainty of evidence. Pharmacological treatment strategies for AP-induced HPRL depends on initial PRL level. No effective strategy was found for patients with AP-induced HPRL less than 50 ng/ml, while adjunctive ARI, switching to ARI in titration and adjunctive high-dose vitamin B6 showed better PRL decrease effect on AP-induced HPRL more than 50 ng/ml.

Metformin in the Treatment of Amisulpride-Induced Hyperprolactinemia: A Clinical Trial

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin in the treatment of amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia.

Methods

A total of 86 schizophrenic patients who developed hyperprolactinemia after taking amisulpride were screened and randomly assigned to the metformin group (42 patients) and placebo group (44 patients) and followed up for eight weeks. The patients’ serum prolactin levels, blood glucose and lipids were measured at the baseline and the end of the intervention. The treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) was also assessed.

Results

After eight weeks of intervention, serum prolactin levels in the metformin group decreased from (1737.360 ± 626.918) mIU/L at baseline to (1618.625 ± 640.865) mIU/L, whereas serum prolactin levels in the placebo group increased from (2676.470 ± 1269.234) mIU/L at baseline to (2860.933 ± 1317.376) mIU/L. There was a significant difference in prolactin changes (F^covariance = 9.982, P = 0.002) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions (P > 0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Metformin is able to improve amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia with its safety.

Factors influencing prolactin levels in chronic long-term hospitalized schizophrenic patients with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

For long-term hospitalized patients suffering from schizophrenia, metabolic disease and hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) are common comorbidities. This article is aimed at analyzing the factors influencing comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on prolactin (PRL) levels in long-term hospitalized patients suffering from schizophrenia.

METHODS

This study included 378 long-term hospitalized patients with schizophrenia. Common metabolic markers and PRL levels of included samples were collected, and the severity of psychopathology was assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). Based on the patients with or without T2DM, the samples were divided into two groups. The differences in clinical parameters between the two groups were compared, and the effects of the parameters on the PRL levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with non-DM patients, the patients in the DM subgroup had lower PRL levels (P < 0.0001) and rather severe psychiatric symptoms (P = 0.016). Female, treated by risperidone, and high levels of triglyceride (TG) were faced with risk for HPRL (B = 26.31, t = 5.39, P < 0.0001; B = 19.52, t = 4.00, P < 0.0001; B = 2.71, t = 2.31, P = 0.022, respectively). Meanwhile, co-morbid DM and aripiprazole treatment were protective factors (B = 15.47, t = 3.05, P = 0.002; B = -23.77, t = -2.47, P = 0.014; respectively). Ultimately, in the DM subgroup, the dose of metformin was found to be a protective factor for HPRL (B = -0.01, t = -1.46, P = 0.047), while female and aripiprazole were risk factors (B = 16.06, t = 3.26, P = 0.001; B = 20.13, t = 2.57, P = 0.011; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Aripiprazole is a protective factor for HPRL in long-term hospitalized patients, whereas the female is a risk factor. Metformin is beneficial in reducing PRL levels in patients with co-morbid DM. More aggressive and effective interventions are required for preventing adverse drug reactions in women and patients with co-DM.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and sexual functioning in metformin-treated men after discontinuation of testosterone replacement therapy: A pilot study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Metformin was found to reduce elevated gonadotropin levels. The aim of the present study was to determine whether metformin modulates the impact of discontinuation of testosterone therapy on hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activity and sexual function in men with low testosterone levels.

METHODS

The study included 28 men with late-onset hypogonadism (defined according to the criteria of the European Male Aging Study group) receiving testosterone undecanoate (120 mg in three equal doses), 12 of whom had been treated with oral metformin (1.7-3 g daily). Both testosterone and metformin had been administered for at least six months before enrolment. In all patients, testosterone replacement required to be discontinued. The control group included 16 testosterone- and metformin-treated men with late-onset hypogonadism who during the entire study period continued their treatment. Glucose homeostasis markers, as well as plasma levels of insulin, gonadotropins, testosterone, calculated bioavailable testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate, oestradiol, thyrotropin, free thyroxine, prolactin, insulin-growth factor-1 and cortisol were measured at the beginning of the study and four months later. Moreover, at the beginning and the end of the study, all enrolled patients completed a questionnaire assessing their sexual functioning (IIEF-15).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Discontinuation of testosterone therapy resulted in a decrease in total testosterone and bioavailable testosterone (by 42% and 45% in metformin-treated patients, and by 52% and 54% in metformin-naïve patients), as well as impaired all aspects of male sexual function. Changes in bioavailable testosterone, as well as in erectile function, orgasmic function and sexual desire were less pronounced if subjects received metformin. Only in metformin-naïve men, follow-up FSH and LH levels were higher than at baseline (by 75% and 62%). Moreover, discontinuation of testosterone therapy in metformin-naïve men increased glycated haemoglobin, as well as worsened insulin sensitivity. There were no differences between baseline and follow-up levels of the remaining hormones. In metformin-naïve subjects, the increase in gonadotropin levels correlated with the changes in testosterone levels and insulin sensitivity. No effect on glucose homeostasis markers, hormone levels and sexual functioning was observed in the control group.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The obtained results suggest that metformin treatment mitigates the unfavourable effect of discontinuation of testosterone treatment on hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis activity and sexual function in men with late-onset hypogonadism.

The impact of metformin on prolactin levels in postmenopausal women

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Metformin-induced reduction in prolactin levels is more pronounced in users of hormonal contraception than in non-users. The current study was aimed at investigating whether physiological concentrations of estradiol determine the impact of metformin on lactotrope secretory function.

METHODS

We studied two matched groups of postmenopausal women with elevated prolactin levels. Twenty-three women were on hormone replacement therapy (group 1), while the remaining ones (group 2, n = 23) did not use sex hormones. Because of coexistent prediabetes, all individuals received metformin (2.55-3 g daily) for the following six months. Circulating levels of total prolactin, monomeric prolactin, thyrotropin, gonadotropins, free thyroid hormones and estradiol were determined at the beginning and at the end of the study.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Compared with group 1, group 2 was characterized by higher gonadotropin levels and lower estrogen levels. Although metformin reduced monomeric prolactin levels in both study groups, this effect was more pronounced in group 1 than in group 2. Only in group 1, metformin decreased total prolactin levels, while only in group 2 the drug reduced FSH levels. Metformin treatment did not affect circulating levels of the remaining hormones. The impact of metformin on total and monomeric prolactin levels correlated with baseline prolactin levels and with the degree of improvement in insulin sensitivity.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The obtained results indicate that the impact of metformin on lactotrope secretory function is partially determined by the estrogen status of patients.

Guidance on the treatment of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia when switching the antipsychotic is not an option

Disclaimer

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose

This article aims to evaluate management options for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia and associated treatment considerations such as efficacy, tolerability, drug interactions, contraindications, and dosing regimens.

Summary

Hyperprolactinemia is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics. First-line management includes reducing the dose of the offending antipsychotic, discontinuing the antipsychotic, or switching to another antipsychotic associated with a lower risk of hyperprolactinemia. However, these options are not always practical and are associated with a risk of relapse of the psychiatric illness. Other management options include adjunctive aripiprazole, dopamine agonists (cabergoline and bromocriptine), metformin, and herbal supplements. A search of Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar using key terms such as hyperprolactinemia, prolactin, antipsychotic, treatment guidelines, aripiprazole, dopamine agonist, cabergoline, bromocriptine, metformin, herbals, supplements, and medications was conducted for literature retrieval. Upon evaluation of the available literature we found the following: (1) aripiprazole is safe and effective in lowering prolactin levels within normal limits; (2) adjunctive cabergoline and bromocriptine decrease elevated prolactin levels, while cabergoline may be more effective in reducing prolactin but can also be associated with a more serious adverse effect of cardiac valvular abnormalities; (3) metformin causes a mild reduction of prolactin levels; and (4) there are limited data to support use of herbal medications (chamomile, Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction, and shakuyaku-kanzo-to) in antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia

Conclusion

There are treatments available for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in patients who are unable to alter their current antipsychotic regimen. However, there remains a need for additional short- and long-term studies to determine the efficacy and safety of these treatment strategies, given that patients taking antipsychotics typically require chronic, life-long treatment for their illnesses.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Aripiprazole, Metformin, and Paeoniae-Glycyrrhiza Decoction for Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Aripiprazole, metformin, and paeoniae-glycyrrhiza decoction (PGD) have been widely used as adjunctive treatments to reduce antipsychotic (AP)-induced hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of these medications have not been previously studied. A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety between aripiprazole, metformin, and PGD as adjunctive medications in reducing AP-induced hyperprolactinemia in schizophrenia. Both international (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases) and Chinese (WanFang, Chinese Biomedical, and Chinese National Knowledge infrastructure) databases were searched from their inception until January 3, 2019. Data were analyzed using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations with the WinBUGS software. A total of 62 RCTs with 5,550 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Of the nine groups of treatments included, adjunctive aripiprazole (<5 mg/day) was associated with the most significant reduction in prolactin levels compared to placebo (posterior MD = -65.52, 95% CI = -104.91, -24.08) and the other eight treatment groups. Moreover, adjunctive PGD (>1:1) was associated with the lowest rate of all-cause discontinuation compared to placebo (posterior odds ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.10, 3.13) and adjunctive aripiprazole (>10 mg/day) was associated with fewer total adverse drug events than placebo (posterior OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.65, 1.77) and other eight treatment groups. In addition, when risperidone, amisulpride, and olanzapine were the primary AP medications, adjunctive paeoniae/glycyrrhiza = 1:1, aripiprazole <5 mg/day, and aripiprazole >10 mg/day were the most effective treatments in reducing the prolactin levels, respectively. Adjunctive aripiprazole, metformin, and PGD showed beneficial effects in reducing AP-induced hyperprolactinemia in schizophrenia, with aripiprazole (<5 mg/day) being the most effective one.

Pharmacological treatment strategies for lowering prolactin in people with a psychotic disorder and hyperprolactinaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Different therapeutic strategies are used for lowering prolactin concentrations in patients with psychotic disorders with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia. We aimed to examine the evidence from open-label studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that studied four prolactin-lowering therapeutic strategies in people with psychotic disorders and hyperprolactinaemia: 1) switching to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics; 2) adding aripiprazole; 3) adding dopamine agonists; and 4) adding metformin. RCTs were included in a meta-analysis. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) of prolactin reductions with each strategy were calculated. Withdrawal rates were also considered. We identified 26 studies. Nine studies explored switching antipsychotic treatment to aripiprazole (n = 4), olanzapine (n = 1), quetiapine (n = 2), paliperidone palmitate (n = 1) or blonanserin (n = 1). Twelve studies tested the addition of aripiprazole. Six studies explored the addition of cabergoline (n = 3), bromocriptine (n = 2) or terguride (n = 1). We also found one meta-analysis testing the addition of metformin to antipsychotic treatment but no other individual studies. A meta-analysis could only be performed for the addition of aripiprazole, the strategy with the best level of evidence. Five RCTs testing the addition of aripiprazole yielded a significant reduction in prolactin concentration compared to placebo (N = 3) or maintaining antipsychotic treatment (N = 2): Hedges' g was -1.35 (CI 95%: -1.93 to -0.76, p < 0.001). The three placebo-controlled RCTs for aripiprazole addition showed similar withdrawal rates for aripiprazole (10.1%) and placebo (11.5%), without significant differences in the meta-analysis. Our study suggests that, in terms of levels of evidence, adding aripiprazole is the first option to be considered for lowering prolactin concentrations in patients with schizophrenia and hyperprolactinaemia.

Antipsychotic-induced Hyperprolactinemia in aging populations: Prevalence, implications, prevention and management

This paper reviews the prevalence, implications, prevention and management of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in aging populations. Antipsychotics are indicated mainly for the treatment of psychotic illness but are also used in other conditions. Complications induced by antipsychotics increase with age, due to age-related changes in drug metabolism and excretion. Almost all antipsychotics lead to hyperprolactinemia by blocking dopamine D2 receptors in the anterior pituitary gland, which counteracts dopamine's inhibitory action on prolactin secretion. The main findings of this narrative review are that, though many of the known side effects of high prolactin levels lose their salience with age, the risk of exacerbating osteoporosis remains critical. Methods of preventing antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in older individuals include using antipsychotic medication (AP) as sparingly as possible and monitoring AP serum levels, regularly measuring prolactin levels, closely monitoring bone density, treating substance abuse, and teaching patients stress management techniques. When hyperprolactinemia symptoms cannot be otherwise managed, adjunctive drugs are available. Potential helpful adjuncts are: dopamine agonists, antipsychotics with partial agonist properties (e.g. aripiprazole), selective estrogen receptor modulators, and metformin. Because a gold standard for prevention/treatment has not been established, clinical decisions need to be made based on safety and individual circumstance.

Current and Novel Approaches to Mitigate Cardiometabolic Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics

Second-generation antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances are a major public health issue given the widespread prescribing of these medications. The lack of clearly known mechanisms of cardiometabolic adverse effects and the relevance of cardiometabolic health for survival make this an important area for research. While nonpharmacologic and some pharmacologic treatments have shown benefits vs control conditions or placebo, the effects are modest and long-term benefits are less clear. Therefore, new approaches to mitigate second-generation antipsychotic-associated cardiometabolic burden are sorely needed.

Adjunctive aripiprazole for antipsychotic-related hyperprolactinaemia in patients with first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

Background

Hyperprolactinaemia is a common antipsychotic (AP)-induced adverse effect, particularly in female patients.

Aims

This meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of adjunctive aripiprazole in preventing AP-related hyperprolactinaemia in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.

Methods

PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, WanFang and China Journal Net databases were searched to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Primary outcomes were the reductions of serum prolactin level and prolactin-related symptoms. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and analysed using RevMan (V.5.3). Weighted/standardised mean differences (WMDs/SMDs)±95% CIs were reported.

Results

In the five RCTs (n=400), the adjunctive aripiprazole (n=197) and the control groups (n=203) with a mean of 11.2 weeks of treatment duration were compared. The aripiprazole group had a significantly lower endpoint serum prolactin level in all patients (five RCTs, n=385; WMD: −50.43 ng/mL (95% CI: −75.05 to −25.81), p<0.00001; I²=99%), female patients (two RCTs, n=186; WMD: −22.58 ng/mL (95% CI: −25.67 to −19.49), p<0.00001; I²=0%) and male patients (two RCTs, n=127; WMD: −68.80 ng/mL (95% CI: −100.11 to −37.49), p<0.0001). In the sensitivity analysis for the endpoint serum prolactin level in all patients, the findings remained significant (p<0.00001; I²=96%). The aripiprazole group was superior to the control group in improving negative symptoms as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (three RCTs, n=213; SMD: −0.51 (95% CI: −0.79 to −0.24), p=0.0002; I²=0%). Adverse effects and discontinuation rates were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Adjunctive aripiprazole appears to be associated with reduced AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia and improved prolactin-related symptoms in first-episode schizophrenia. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

The Impact of Ethinyl Estradiol on Metformin Action on Prolactin Levels in Women with Hyperprolactinemia

Background Metformin reduced prolactin levels only in women with hyperprolactinemia.

Objective The purpose of this case-control study was to compare metformin action on lactoctrope function between women receiving oral contraceptive pills and women not using hormonal contraception.

Methods The study included two groups of matched women with elevated prolactin levels and new-onset prediabetes or diabetes. The first group consisted of 20 women using oral contraceptive pills for at least 12 months before entering the study, while the second group included 20 patients not using any hormonal contraception. Over the whole study period, all women were treated with metformin (1.7–3 g daily). Circulating levels of glucose, insulin, prolactin, thyrotropin, free thyroid hormones, adrenocorticotropic hormone, gonadotropins and insulin-like growth factor-1 were measured at the beginning and at the end of the study (16 weeks later).

Results Thirty-eight patients completed the study. Metformin reduced plasma glucose levels and improved insulin sensitivity but the latter effect was stronger in women receiving oral contraceptive pills than in women not using any contraception. Although metformin treatment decreased plasma prolactin levels in both study groups, this effect was stronger in women taking oral contraceptive pills. Only in this group of women, metformin increased plasma luteinizing hormone levels. The changes in plasma prolactin correlated with their baseline insulin sensitivity and the effect of metformin on insulin sensitivity. Metformin did not affect plasma levels of thyrotropin, free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, follicle-stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1.

Conclusions The obtained results suggest that the effect of metformin on overactive lactotropes depends on estrogen levels.

Adjunctive Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinaemia is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics (APs). The results of Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction (PGD) as a potentially useful adjunctive treatment for hyperprolactinaemia are inconsistent.

AIM

This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examined the efficacy and safety of adjunctive PGD therapy for AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia.

METHODS

English (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO) and Chinese (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data) databases were systematically searched up to 10 June 2018. The inclusion criteria were based on PICOS-Participants: adult patients with schizophrenia; Intervention: PGD plus APs; Comparison: APs plus placebo or AP monotherapy; Outcomes: efficacy and safety; Study design: RCTs. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR) along with their 95% CIs were calculated using Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.3 software.

RESULTS

Five RCTs (n=450) were included and analysed. Two RCTs (n=140) were double-blind and four RCTs (n=409) reported 'random' assignment with specific description. The PGD group showed a significantly lower serum prolactin level at endpoint than the control group (n=380, WMD: -32.69  ng/mL (95%  CI -41.66 to 23.72), p<0.00001, I 2 =97%). Similarly, the superiority of PGD over the control groups was also found in the improvement of hyperprolactinaemia-related symptoms. No difference was found in the improvement of psychiatric symptoms assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (n=403, WMD: -0.62 (95% CI -2.38 to 1.15), p=0.49, I 2 =0%). There were similar rates of all-cause discontinuation (n=330, RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.37), p=0.71, I 2 =0%) and adverse drug reactions between the two groups. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the level of evidence of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from 'very low' (14.3%), 'low' (42.8%), 'moderate' (14.3%), to 'high' (28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports the adjunctive use of PGD to suppress elevated prolactin and improve prolactin-induced symptoms without significant adverse events in adult patients with AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia. High-quality RCTs with longer duration are needed to confirm these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

42016037017.