Radiomics and stacking regression model for measuring bone mineral density using abdominal computed tomography

Explainable machine-learning-based prediction of QCT/FEA-calculated femoral strength under stance loading configuration using radiomics features

Finite element analysis can provide precise femoral strength assessment. However, its modeling procedures were complex and time-consuming. This study aimed to develop a model to evaluate femoral strength calculated by quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) under stance loading configuration, offering an effective, simple, and explainable method. One hundred participants with hip QCT images were selected from the Hong Kong part of the Osteoporotic fractures in men cohort. Radiomics features were extracted from QCT images. Filter method, Pearson correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method were employed for feature selection and dimension reduction. The remaining features were utilized as inputs, and femoral strengths were calculated as the ground truth through QCT/FEA. Support vector regression was applied to develop a femoral strength prediction model. The influence of various numbers of input features on prediction performance was compared, and the femoral strength prediction model was established. Finally, Shapley additive explanation, accumulated local effects, and partial dependency plot methods were used to explain the model. The results indicated that the model performed best when six radiomics features were selected. The coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error, the normalized root mean square error, and the mean squared error on the testing set were 0.820, 1016.299 N, 10.645%, and 750.827 N, respectively. Additionally, these features all positively contributed to femoral strength prediction. In conclusion, this study provided a noninvasive, effective, and explainable method of femoral strength assessment, and it may have clinical application potential.

Different MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor of the parotid gland: a multicenter study

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of MRI-based radiomics models in distinguishing between Warthin tumors (WT) and misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma (PA).

Methods

Data of patients with PA and WT from two centers were collected. MR images were used to extract radiomic features. The optimal radiomics model was found by running nine machine learning algorithms after feature reduction and selection. To create a clinical model, univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis and multivariate LR were used. The independent clinical predictors and radiomics were combined to create a nomogram. Two integrated models were constructed by the ensemble and stacking algorithms respectively based on the clinical model and the optimal radiomics model. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

There were 149 patients included in all. Gender, age, and smoking of patients were independent clinical predictors. With the greatest average AUC (0.896) and accuracy (0.839) in validation groups, the LR model was the optimal radiomics model. In the average validation group, the radiomics model based on LR did not have a higher AUC (0.795) than the clinical model (AUC = 0.909). The nomogram (AUC = 0.953) outperformed the radiomics model in terms of discrimination performance. The nomogram in the average validation group had a highest AUC than the stacking model (0.914) or ensemble model (0.798).

Conclusion

Misdiagnosed or ambiguous PA and WT can be non-invasively distinguished using MRI-based radiomics models. The nomogram exhibited excellent and stable diagnostic performance. In daily work, it is necessary to combine with clinical parameters for distinguishing between PA and WT.

A computed tomography radiomics-based model for predicting osteoporosis after breast cancer treatment

Many treatments against breast cancer decrease the level of estrogen in blood, resulting in bone loss, osteoporosis and fragility fractures in breast cancer patients. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate a novel opportunistic screening for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in breast cancer patients using CT radiomics. Between 2011 and 2021, a total of 412 female breast cancer patients who received treatment and were followed up in our institution, had post-treatment dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination of the lumbar vertebrae and had post-treatment chest CT scan that encompassed the L1 vertebra, were included in this study. Results indicated that the T-score of L1 vertebra had a strongly positive correlation with the average T-score of L1-L4 vertebrae derived from DXA (r = 0.91, p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, four clinical variables (age, body weight, menopause status, aromatase inhibitor exposure duration) and three radiomic features extracted from the region of interest of L1 vertebra (original_firstorder_RootMeanSquared, wavelet.HH_glcm_InverseVariance, and wavelet.LL_glcm_MCC) were selected for building predictive models of L1 T-score and bone health. The predictive model combining clinical and radiomic features showed the greatest adjusted R2 value (0.557), sensitivity (83.6%), specificity (74.2%) and total accuracy (79.4%) compared to models that relied solely on clinical data, radiomic features, or Hounsfield units. In conclusion, the clinical-radiomic predictive model may be used as an opportunistic screening tool for early identification of breast cancer survivors at high risk of CTIBL based on non-contrast CT images of the L1 vertebra, thereby facilitating early intervention for osteoporosis.

Machine Learning in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) can offer revolutionary advances in their application to the field of spine surgery. Within the past 5 years, novel applications of ML have assisted in surgical decision-making, intraoperative imaging and navigation, and optimization of clinical outcomes. ML has the capacity to address many different clinical needs and improve diagnostic and surgical techniques. This review will discuss current applications of ML in the context of spine surgery by breaking down its implementation preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Ethical considerations to ML and challenges in ML implementation must be addressed to maximally benefit patients, spine surgeons, and the healthcare system. Areas for future research in augmented reality and mixed reality, along with limitations in generalizability and bias, will also be highlighted.

Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography

Osteoporosis, marked by low bone mineral density (BMD) and a high fracture risk, is a major health issue. Recent progress in medical imaging, especially CT scans, offers new ways of diagnosing and assessing osteoporosis. This review examines the use of AI analysis of CT scans to stratify BMD and diagnose osteoporosis. By summarizing the relevant studies, we aimed to assess the effectiveness, constraints, and potential impact of AI-based osteoporosis classification (severity) via CT. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 39 articles were retrieved from the databases, and the key findings were compiled and summarized, including the regions analyzed, the type of CT imaging, and their efficacy in predicting BMD compared with conventional DXA studies. Important considerations and limitations are also discussed. The overall reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI in classifying osteoporosis using CT images ranged from 61.8% to 99.4%, 41.0% to 100.0%, and 31.0% to 100.0% respectively, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.582 to 0.994. While additional research is necessary to validate the clinical efficacy and reproducibility of these AI tools before incorporating them into routine clinical practice, these studies demonstrate the promising potential of using CT to opportunistically predict and classify osteoporosis without the need for DEXA.

Different multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating stage IA endometrial cancer from benign endometrial lesions: A multicenter study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of different multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models in differentiating stage IA endometrial cancer (EC) from benign endometrial lesions.

Methods

The data of patients with endometrial lesions from two centers were collected. The radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (LCE-T1WI). After data dimension reduction and feature selection, nine machine learning algorithms were conducted to determine which was the optimal radiomics model for differential diagnosis. The univariate analyses and logistic regression (LR) were performed to reduce valueless clinical parameters and to develop the clinical model. A nomogram using the radscores combined with clinical parameters was developed. Two integrated models were obtained respectively by the ensemble strategy and stacking algorithm based on the clinical model and optimal radiomics model. The area under the curve (AUC), clinical decisive curve (CDC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI) were used to evaluate the performance and clinical benefits of the models.

Results

A total of 371 patients were incorporated. The LR model was the optimal radiomics model with the highest average AUC (0.854) and accuracy (0.802) in the internal and external validation groups (AUC = 0.910 and 0.798, respectively), and outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.739 and 0.592, respectively) or the radiologist (AUC = 0.768 and 0.628, respectively). The nomogram (AUC = 0.917 and 0.802, respectively) achieved better discrimination performance than the optimal radiomics model in two validation groups. The stacking model (AUC = 0.915) and ensemble model (AUC = 0.918) had a similar performance compared with the nomogram in the internal validation group, whereas the AUCs of the stacking model (AUC = 0.792) and ensemble model (AUC = 0.794) were lower than those of the nomogram and radiomics model in the external validation group. According to the CDC, NRI, and IDI, the optimal radiomics model, nomogram, stacking model, and ensemble model achieved good net benefits.

Conclusions

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models can non-invasively differentiate stage IA EC from benign endometrial lesions, and LR is the best machine learning algorithm. The nomogram presents excellent and stable diagnostic efficiency.