Epirubicin in the Treatment of Malignant Mesothelioma: A Phase II Cooperative Study

Combined chemotherapy with cytotoxic and targeted compounds for the management of human malignant pleural mesothelioma

Human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM) is an aggressive asbestos-associated cancer, the incidence of which is increasing and which, despite progress in diagnosis and therapy, continues to have a poor prognosis. Asbestos fibers induce aberrant cell signaling, leading to proto-oncogene activation and chemoresistance. In this review, we discuss the evolution of pharmacological management of hMPM up to the most recent advances. Monotherapy with single cytotoxic drugs achieves modest objective response rates, seldom reaching 30%. However, combination regimens using novel drugs and standard molecules are showing gradually improving responses and clinical benefits. Phase II/III studies have identified pemetrexed, a multitarget folate pathway inhibitor in combination with platinum derivatives, and the cisplatin/gemcitabine association as front-line chemotherapy for hMPM. Detailed knowledge of molecular mechanisms of signal transduction and neoangiogenesis in hMPM should aid in the design and screening of other promising compounds such as more efficacious receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

OPINION STATEMENT

All MPM patients with a good performance status should be considered for enrollment on clinical trials. With that said, the standard frontline therapy for fit MPM patients remains an antifolate/platinum doublet, based on large, well powered randomized clinical trials that showed not only a survival benefit for antifolate/platinum regimens but also improvements in quality of life and/or symptoms. For less fit patients, single agents can be used as frontline therapy. In the second line setting, there is benefit from retreatment with single agent pemetrexed after prior exposure to that agent, as well as after exposure to other chemotherapeutic agents. Other single chemotherapy agents and combinations are viable options for fit patients who have had relatively long time to progression after their frontline therapy. Additionally, several prognostic scales designed for MPM (CALGB and EORTC) provide additional means to better select patients for frontline and second line chemotherapy.

Current options for systemic therapy in mesothelioma

Systemic therapy options for patients with mesothelioma remain limited. Although many conventional chemotherapeutic agents have shown modest activity in this disease, only the combination of cisplatin plus pemetrexed has demonstrated an improvement in clinical outcomes in a phase III trial when compared with single modality therapies. Clinical investigations of the use of targeted therapies in mesothelioma are ongoing, as investigators attempt to inhibit critical pathways in this disease. This article surveys the current clinical landscape of systemic therapies in mesothelioma and explores the impact of both conventional and targeted agents.

Hyperthermia combined with intra-thoracic chemotherapy and radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Prognosis for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains poor and such patients require intensive treatment. Few studies have examined hyperthermia for MPM. The present study investigated the feasibility of hyperthermia combined with weekly chemo-radiotherapy for patients with MPM and estimated the efficacy of this regimen.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients (median patient age was 67 and all had pleural effusion) with MPM were enrolled in this study. The treatment regimen comprised of weekly thermo-radiotherapy with intra-thoracic chemotherapy 2-5 times at initiation of treatment. Hyperthermia was performed once per week for approximately 60 min. Hemithorax external radiotherapy was administered once weekly on the same day as hyperthermia and just before thermochemotherapy. Median total radiation dose was 6 Gy (range, 2-10 Gy). Chemotherapy was administered into the thoracic cavity through a tube. Chemotherapeutic agents administered were CDDP for seven patients, carboplatinum (CBDCA) for three patients and both CDDP and CBDCA for one patient. Dose of CDDP was 50 mg/body and dose of CBDCA was 200-300 mg m-2. Response rate and median survival time (MST) and palliative effect were investigated.

RESULTS

Complete response was not achieved in any of the 11 patients. Partial response was achieved in three of 11 patients (27.3%), SD in six patients (54.5%) and PD in two patients (18.2%). There was no correlational relationship between thermal parameters and response. MST was 27.1 months. Pleural fluid decreased in all patients after therapy, while all patients displayed improved performance status and could be discharged from hospital. Patients with partial response had a relatively longer survival time than SD or PD. All patients underwent the complete course of treatment and only one of 11 patients developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

It was therefore concluded that hyperthermia combined with intra-thoracic chemotherapy using cisplatinum or carboplatinum may be tolerable. This approach appears effective and more acceptable for patients with MPM with pleural effusion than other multi-modality therapy.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: medical treatment update

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease usually unaffected by current therapeutic strategies, but for the majority of patients, the use of systemic chemotherapeutic drugs remains the only therapeutic option available. During the past 15-20 years, many phase II and a few phase III clinical trials have studied a large variety of drugs such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, platinum compounds, taxanes, vinka alkaloids, and antifolates as single agents and in combination, with the aim to increase responses and survival. The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin tested in the largest phase III randomized trial of malignant pleural mesothelioma ever conducted has become the current standard of care. New targeted therapeutic approaches with a variety of anti-growth factor drugs are currently undergoing investigation worldwide.

Recent advances in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma clinically manifests after decades of initial exposure to etiologic agents, such as asbestos, and presents with nonspecific symptoms such as dyspnea, pain, or weight loss. In patients with limited, resectable disease, surgical therapy with extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy is recommended, although, it is unclear which approach is superior. Radiation has a limited role and is used primarily for palliation. The palliative efficacy of traditional chemotherapeutic agents and combination regimens is modest at best. The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed, a novel multitargeted antifolate agent, is the approved "standard of care" for patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. A number of molecularly targeted agents are currently under evaluation for mesothelioma such as the Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors that have demonstrated promising anticancer activity. Vorinostat, a small molecule inhibitor of HDAC, which targets select members of class I and II HDACs, has shown early evidence of activity and is currently being evaluated in a randomized study for patients who progress with standard therapy for advanced mesothelioma. It is hoped that the HDAC inhibitors and other novel targeted agents will pave the way for improved outcomes for patients with this disease.

Phase II Study of Vinflunine in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Purpose

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease of increasing incidence for which treatment options are limited. This study reports the clinical efficacy data for vinflunine, a novel microtubule inhibitor, in MPM.

Patients and Methods

Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of MPM were eligible for enrollment onto this multicenter phase II trial if they had not received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy and had measurable lesions by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Vinflunine 320 mg/m2 by 10-minute intravenous infusion was administered on day 1 of 21-day cycles. Modifications of dose and schedule were made according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Efficacy was assessed by an external, independent radiologist. The one-sample multiple testing procedure of Fleming was applied at the predetermined recruitment stages of 20 and 40 assessable patients.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. Five patients were not assessable for tumor response. The response rate was 13.8% (95% CI, 6.5% to 24.7%). The median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 12.0 months). The most common adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, constipation, and nausea. Of grade 3 and 4 toxicities, neutropenia and constipation were the most common (45% and 9% of patients, respectively).

Conclusion

Vinflunine can be delivered with high-dose intensity in patients with MPM. The response rate and median survival are encouraging for a single agent. These data suggest that vinflunine should be further evaluated in the management of MPM.

Four-Modality Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment approaches in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients range from mere palliation to aggressive anticancer therapy, and there is currently no consensus on the optimal therapeutic strategy. In 1999, we began a phase II study to investigate four-modality treatment of advanced stage MPM.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2004, 49 patients with International Mesothelioma Interest Group stage II-III MPM underwent four-modality treatment with intrapleural preoperative interleukin-2 (18 x 10(6) UI/day for 3 days), pleurectomy/decortication, intrapleural postoperative epidoxorubicin (25 mg/m2 for 3 days), interleukin-2 (18 x 10(6) UI/day for 3 days), adjuvant radiotherapy (30 Gy), systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1, gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 for up to six courses) and long-term subcutaneous interleukin-2 (3 x 10(6) UI/day on 3 days per week).

RESULTS

Patients included 41 men and eight women with a median age of 61 years (range, 41-77). All patients were diagnosed with MPM by thoracoscopy before inclusion. There was no postoperative mortality. Postoperative morbidity included bleeding (n = 1) and arrhythmias (n = 3). After a median follow-up of 59 months (range, 14-81), 13 patients are still alive and the median actuarial survival is 26 months (31 and 21 months for stages II and III, respectively). The 2- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 60.2% and 23.3%, respectively. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status significantly influenced survival time (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The four-modality treatment that we adopted for advanced-stage MPM was feasible, well tolerated by most of the patients, and produced a favorable median survival. This treatment approach warrants further investigation.

Ribonucleases as a novel pro-apoptotic anticancer strategy: review of the preclinical and clinical data for ranpirnase

Cytotoxic ribonucleases (RNases), such as ranpiranase, represent a novel mechanism-based approach to anticancer therapy. These relatively small proteins selectively attack malignant cells, triggering apoptotic response and inhibiting protein synthesis. Ranpirnase, originally isolated from oocytes of Rana pipiens, is a member of a family of endoribonucleases. The anticancer effects of ranpiranase have been documented in both in vitro and in vivo experimental tumor models. The effects of ranpiranase appear to be selective for cancer cells. Based on Phase I study data, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 960 microg/m2, with the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) characterized by proteinuria with or without azotemia, peripheral edema, and fatigue. Ranpirnase did not induce myelosuppression, mucositis, alopecia, cardiotoxicity, coagulopathy, hepatotoxicity, or adverse metabolic effects. Phase II tumor-specific trials investigated the activity of ranpirnase in malignant mesothelioma, breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell cancer. A Phase III randomized study in malignant mesothelioma patients compares the combination of ranpirnase plus doxorubicin to doxorubicin monotherapy.

Chemotherapy options and new advances in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma continues to be a challenging clinical problem. While traditionally, chemotherapy has been thought to be of only modest benefit to patients with this disease, novel antineoplastic agents and combination regimens incorporating these agents are gradually changing this perception. Early attempts at treatment and palliation with single agents such as doxorubicin met with low response rates and little clinical benefit. However, the recently reported clinical benefits of pemetrexed and raltitrexed in combination with cisplatin are changing the perception about the ability of chemotherapy to affect the natural history of the disease. Other combinations, including cisplatin and gemcitabine, have also shown encouraging response rates and clinical activity. Single-agent therapy with vinorelbine may provide useful palliation with low toxicity. Targeted agents developed through increased understanding of the biology of the disease, used alone or as part of multimodal therapy, may provide major clinical gains in the next few years.

Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: past results and recent developments

This review summarises results of previously conducted clinical trials and subsequently presents data arising from all phase II-III studies on chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) published since the last relevant overview. While response rates exceeding 30% have barely been achieved with established cytotoxic drugs in MPM therapy, novel chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations appear somewhat more promising. This applies especially to the antimetabolites, and in particular to pemetrexed which produced response rates of up to 45% in combination with platinum compounds. Raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin has also been shown to be effective, and gemcitabine--applied as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin--as well as vinorelbine appear to improve quality of life in patients presenting with MPM. Data can now be more precisely analysed by increasingly implemented randomised studies, applying a standardised staging system, and distinguishing prognostic groups. While chemotherapy for MPM remains a challenging task, important steps have clearly been made in the past years to combat this aggressive disease. Publication of results from a phase III trial of pemetrexed with cisplatin in a peer reviewed journal may soon establish a standard of care.

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

The diagnosis and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma are major challenges that often frustrate both patient and clinician alike. Occupational asbestos exposure to crocidolite or amosite forms of the fiber is the most important known risk factor in North America and Western Europe. Other mineral fibers such as erionite, a naturally occurring fibrous zeolite crystal, are associated with mesothelioma in volcanic tuffs of the Cappadocia region of central Anatolia in Turkey. In addition, other possible factors such as the presence of simian virus 40 and genetic susceptibility have been associated recently with the development of mesothelioma in animal models. These latter findings are increasing our understanding of this disease. In addition, the discovery of elevated levels of various markers such as folic acid receptor alpha, cyclooxygenase 2, and multidrug resistance proteins 1 and 2 in mesothelioma tissue have opened up new areas of potential diagnostic and therapeutic importance. However, traditional treatment modalities--surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy--have evolved slowly, and few gains in therapeutic efficacy have occurred. Recently, however, continuing research efforts have led to novel treatment strategies that are changing the way clinicians view a disease that has traditionally been managed with almost universal therapeutic nihilism. This review explores our current knowledge of this disease and presents current and novel therapeutic strategies.

Experimental therapy of malignant mesothelioma: new perspectives from anti-angiogenic treatments

We reviewed the published literature of clinical studies in malignant mesothelioma (MM), including phase II as well as older single-agent and combination chemotherapy trials with more than 15 patients. While response rates exceeding 30% have been achieved with established cytotoxic drugs in MM therapy, novel chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations appear more promising. This applies especially to the anti-metabolites (i.e. pemetrexed) that produced response rates of up to 45% in combination with platinum compounds. Moreover, agents targeting novel proliferative and survival pathways in MM are developed to improve treatment outcomes. Here, we focused on the role of several angiogenic growth factors in MM biology and the data of MM-oriented studies on angiostatic agents tested in a phase I-II trial. It seems likely that no single treatment modality will be effective by itself. Studies that use combinations of the newer agents, including angiostatic drugs, with chemotherapy, should be conducted.

Chemotherapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with no known single curative modality. Most patients are candidates for chemotherapy at some point in their treatment, but no standard regimen has been established. Several phase II single-agent and combination chemotherapy studies have been performed over the past 2 decades. Although the true impact of chemotherapy in mesothelioma remains to be determined, agents with consistent antitumor activity include doxorubicin, platinum agents, and antimetabolites. Combination chemotherapy is associated with higher response rates, but not necessarily longer median survivals. Large randomized trials, which are currently ongoing or have been performed in the past few years, will yield important answers in regard to the role of chemotherapy and the efficacy of various single and combination chemotherapy agents. Furthermore, the biologic and genetic studies of mesothelioma have identified several receptor tyrosine kinases that are aberrantly expressed in these tumors. Orally available small molecule inhibitors of several receptor tyrosine kinases have been developed and are now being evaluated in clinical trials.

Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

This paper covers the outcome of previously conducted clinical trials on chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma and presents data from recent phase II and phase III trials. In contrast to conventional cytotoxic drugs, which have barely produced response rates exceeding 30%, recently introduced chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations promise to be more effective. Especially pemetrexed has yielded response rates of up to 45% in combination with platinum compounds. Furthermore, raltitrexed-oxaliplatin has shown promising activity and gemcitabine was found to improve quality of life in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma when applied as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin. Based on robust phase III study results, pemetrexed-cisplatin may soon be considered with chemotherapy for this aggressive disease.

Activity of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis

The role of chemotherapy for unresectable malignant mesothelioma is unclear. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the methodological quality of published papers relative to chemotherapy or immunotherapy in malignant mesothelioma and to aggregate, for trials having a similar methodology, the response rates in order to identify the most active chemotherapeutic drugs and regimens. The literature relative to this topic, published between 1965 and June 2001 was reviewed. A methodological qualitative evaluation was performed according to the European Lung Cancer Working Party scale, specifically designed for phase II trials. A study was considered as potentially positive if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the response rate was greater than 20% and positive if the lower limit of the 95% CI was > 20%. Eighty-three studies (88 treatment arms) were eligible for the systematic review. Fifty-three arms were considered as positive or potentially positive. No statistically significant difference in the methodological quality was observed between negative and positive studies. Studies were aggregated in four groups according to the presence of cisplatin and/or doxorubicin in the treatment regimen. The combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin had the highest response rate (28.5%; P < 0.001). Cisplatin was the most active single-agent regimen. Our systematic qualitative and quantitative overview of the literature suggests that the most active chemotherapeutic regimen, in term of objective response rate, is the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin and the best single-agent is cisplatin. The combination of these two drugs can be recommended as control arm for future randomised phase III trials.

Chemotherapy for malignant mesothelioma: from doxorubicin to vinorelbine

It has been a challenge to find effective chemotherapeutic treatments for malignant mesothelioma. Over the last several decades numerous single-drug and combination regimens have been examined, but no standard treatment with chemotherapy alone has emerged. Possible explanations for this lack of success are the heterogeneity between the different subclasses of mesothelioma and the difficulties experienced in determining responses on computed tomographic (CT) scan. This review will present the results of most chemotherapy trials. An attempt is also been made to overcome the problem of identifying the overall response rate by presenting the median survival time. Other types of response evaluation and guidelines for patient selection are warranted to properly compare chemotherapeutic treatments.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma remains a difficult tumor to treat, much less cure. Currently, the best chance for long-term survival lies with early diagnosis and aggressive surgical extirpation, but given the typically long delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, this is only possible with a high index of suspicion and an aggressive diagnosis workup. Early referral to a tertiary center experienced in the treatment of MPM may be important for several reasons: (1) decreased risk of tumor spread along multiple thoracenesis/biopsy tracts, (2) the availability of specialized pathologic assays for definitive diagnosis, (3) the availability of critical staging modalities (aggressive mediastinoscopy +/- thoracoscopy, MRI scans performed according to specific mesothelioma protocols, and perhaps PET scans), (4) surgical experience with pleurectomy/decortication and/or extrapleural pneumonectomy, that may decrease morbidity and mortality, and (5) the availability of novel adjuvant protocols. Single-modality therapy is unlikely to result in long-term survival. Aggressive surgery is required for optimal debulking, and extrapleural pneumonectomy may offer better local control compared with pleurectomy/ecortication. Delivery of optimal radiation schedules, which may involve large fractions as well as large total doses, is limited by the presence of nearby dose-limiting structures. Current chemotherapy is severely lacking in producing objective responses and improved survival although gemcitabine and IL-2 may be active agents to be combined with radiation and/or other agents. Hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, intracavitary therapy, and gene therapy are all relatively new techniques under active investigation that should be supported by enrollment in on-going protocols. Predictably, many of these techniques provide greater benefit when used in the setting of adjuvant protocols or minimal residual disease, emphasizing the importance of multimodality therapy.

A review of chemotherapy trials for malignant mesothelioma

Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma continues to be frustrating regardless of the modality employed. Numerous trials of chemotherapeutic agents have been performed, but until recently, these studies were small and subject to inaccuracies of disease measurement. To our knowledge, no chemotherapeutic regimen has emerged as a standard of care. A review of the literature reveals that small activity against this disease has been shown by the anthracyclines, platinum compounds, and alkylating agents, whereas higher activity has been reported with the antimetabolites. The plant alkaloids have not demonstrated any activity against mesothelioma. Dose-escalated chemotherapeutic regimens may offer an advantage, whereas combination chemotherapy has not shown any benefit over single-agent therapy. Favorable responses have been reported with the administration of intrapleural biological response modifiers. Further trials and the investigation of new agents in the treatment of this disease are necessary.

Clinical features and current treatment of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an uncommon cancer for which the major risk factor is prior asbestos exposure. During the past decade, there has been progress in the diagnosis, staging and biology of mesothelioma. Treatment remains controversial and ranges from supportive care alone to aggressive multimodality therapy. Prospective clinical trials in carefully staged patients are needed to determine what approaches to treatment may confer a survival benefit.

Current approach to malignant mesothelioma of the pleura

Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura occurs primarily in individuals who were exposed to asbestos either in the workplace or home. The incidence of malignant mesothelioma is rising and, reflective of the malignancy's long latency period, is expected to continue to increase into the next century. Current treatment measures, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, intrapleural therapy, and combined-modality therapies, have had varying impacts on survival. This paper explores current trends in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Treatment of malignant mesothelioma with epirubicin and ifosfamide: a phase II cooperative study

From May 1988 to March 1990, 17 consecutive patients with histologically proven malignant mesothelioma were treated with epirubicin 75 mg/sqm i.v. on day 1 and ifosfamide 1.8 gr/sqm/day i.v. from day 1-5. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until progression. Fifty-three chemotherapy cycles were administered to the 17 patients treated (median, 3 cycles/patient). No complete responses, 1 partial response, 8 stable diseases and 8 progressions were noted. Toxocity was acceptable and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Actuarial median survival was 6 months. In this study, a combination of full doses of epirubicin and ifosfamide did not prove to be active in malignant mesothelioma.