Clinical Effect of Isolated Lateral Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Compared to Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for the Correction of Varus Malalignment: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

[Biomechanical study of three-dimensional printed filler block design in open wedge high tibial osteotomy]

The use of a filling block can improve the initial stability of the fixation plate in the open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), and promote bone healing. However, the biomechanical effects of filling block structures and materials on OWHTO remain unclear. OWHTO anatomical filling block model was designed and built. The finite element analysis method was adopted to study the influence of six filling block structure designs and four different materials on the stress of the fixed plate, tibia, screw, and filling block, and the micro-displacement at the wedge gap of the OWHTO fixation system. After the filling block was introduced in the OWHTO, the maximum von Mises stress of the fixation plate was reduced by more than 30%, the maximum von Mises stress of the tibia decreased by more than 15%, and the lateral hinge decreased by 81%. When the filling block was designed to be filled in the posterior position of the wedge gap, the maximum von Mises stress of the fixation system was 97.8 MPa, which was smaller than other filling methods. The minimum micro-displacement of osteotomy space was -2.9 μm, which was larger than that of other filling methods. Compared with titanium alloy and tantalum metal materials, porous hydroxyapatite material could obtain larger micro-displacement in the osteotomy cavity, which is conducive to stimulating bone healing. The results demonstrate that OWHTO with a filling block can better balance the stress distribution of the fixation system, and a better fixation effect can be obtained by using a filling block filled in the posterior position. Porous HA used as the material of the filling block can obtain a better bone healing effect.

Around-the-knee osteotomies part 1: definitions, rationale and planning-state of the art

Knee osteotomies are essential orthopedic procedures with the ability to preserve the joint and correct ligament instabilities. Literature supports the correlation between lower limb malalignment and outcomes after knee ligament reconstruction and cartilage procedures. Concepts such as joint line obliquity, posterior tibial slope angle, and intra-articular deformity correction are integral components of both preoperative planning and postoperative evaluations. The concept of preserving and/or restoring joint line congruence during simultaneous correction of varus or valgus deformity can be achieved through several different approaches. With advancements in osteotomy research and surgical planning technology, the surgical decision-making has increased in complexity. Based upon a patient's specific deformity, decisions need to be made whether to perform a single-level (proximal tibia or distal femur) versus double-level (both proximal tibia and distal femur) osteotomy, and whether to correct deformity in a single plane (coronal or sagittal) or perform a biplanar osteotomy, correcting two of the malalignments in either coronal, sagittal, or axial planes. Osteotomy procedures prioritize safety, reproducibility, precision, and meticulous planning. Equally important is the proactive management of possible complications and the implementation of preventive strategies for complications such as hinge fractures and unintentional changes to alignment in other planes. This review navigates the intricate landscape of lower limb alignment, commencing with foundational definitions and rationale for performing osteotomies, progressing through the planning phase, and addressing the critical aspect of complication prevention, all while looking ahead to anticipate future advancements in this field. However, rotational osteotomies and tibial tubercle osteotomies in isolation or as an adjunct procedure are beyond the scope of this review.

Outcomes of Medial Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy for Femoral- and Tibial-Based Valgus Deformity

BACKGROUND

In carefully selected patients with an arthritic valgus knee, distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) can improve symptoms at medium- to long-term follow-up, reducing osteoarthritis progression. To date, there is no clear evidence in the current literature regarding the role of postoperative joint line obliquity (JLO) in valgus deformity correction.

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial closing-wedge DFO (MCW-DFO) for the treatment of valgus knees, considering both tibial- and femoral-based deformities, as well as to verify the efficacy and safety of MCW-DFO according to JLO boundaries (≤4°).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with valgus knees. Patients were divided into 2 groups: femoral-based valgus (FB-V) and tibial-based valgus (TB-V). Knee radiographs were collected before surgery and at the last follow-up. The clinical outcome was evaluated through several validated scores (International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Society Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner, Numeric Rating Scale, Crosby-Insall).

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (34 knees) with a mean age of 49.3 ± 9.1 years were included in the study. The overall mean follow-up was 9.4 ± 5.9 years. The mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle was 187.6°± 3.3° (range, 181.5°-191°) and the postoperative angle was 180°± 3.1° (range, 176°-185°). Most postoperative JLOs were within the safe zone of ≤4° in both groups (the postoperative JLO was >4° in 4 patients in the TB-V group and 1 patient in the FB-V group), although FB-V knees exhibited significant superior JLO correction (postoperative JLO in the TB-V group: mean, 4.0°± 2.5° [P = .1]; postoperative JLO in the FB-V group: mean, 2.4°± 1.4° [P = .5]). Significant improvements in all clinical scores were observed in both groups (P < .01). Additionally, the severity of the osteoarthritis did not worsen at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MCW-DFO is an effective procedure for treating pathological valgus knees, regardless of the site of the deformity. Both FB-V and TB-V groups showed comparable improvements in the clinical scores, development of osteoarthritis, and the restoration of a neutral mechanical axis. Notably, FB-V knees achieved more JLO correction compared with the TB-V ones.

Comparison of antegrade and retrograde cross pin fixation in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures: A biomechanical study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare biomechanical stability of Kirschner wires (K-wires) sent with antegrade and retrograde technique in the fixation of pediatric supracondylar femur fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A transverse fracture model was created two centimeters above the physis in 24 synthetic bone models suitable for the pediatric femur bone structure. The models were randomly divided into two groups as 12 bones each. In the first group (Group 1), 12 bone fracture models were retrogradely fixed with two cross K-wires. In the second group (Group 2), the fracture was fixed antegradely. In Group 2, both wire ends were allowed to protrude three millimeters from the femoral condyles. The stability of the groups was tested biomechanically by exposing them to varus and extension forces. The forces corresponding to 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm displacement and failure loads were calculated in two groups.

RESULTS

According to the test results regarding displacements and failure loads, the retrograde group was found to be significantly stronger than the antegrade group against varus loads (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of extension strength, the results of the two groups were similar and there was no statistical difference between them (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Retrograde cross K-wires fixation provides a more stable fixation against varus forces. This is important to prevent varus deformity, which is a clinically less tolerable deformity. However, considering that full-weight mobilization of patients is not allowed after surgery in pediatric supracondylar femur fractures, the surgeon should consider that K-wires can also be sent antegrade to decrease the risk of septic arthritis.

Effect of lateral hinge fractures for bone union and clinical outcomes following opening-wedge distal tibial tubercle osteotomy in comparison with opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

Although the effects of lateral hinge fractures (LHF) on bone union and clinical outcomes after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) have been established, the effects of LHF after opening-wedge distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (OWDTO) are unclear. We hypothesised that LHF after OWDTO would be associated with delayed bone union and result in poorer clinical outcomes than expected for LHF after OWHTO.

METHODS

This study enrolled 100 patients, with 50 OWDTO patients (18 men; mean age, 63.2 years) and 50 OWHTO patients compared based on the propensity score matched analysis. The effect of LHF on bone union was compared between the groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at the mean follow-up of 28 months.

RESULTS

There was no between-group difference in the incidence rate of LHF. However, the rate of bone union at the anterior flange in the presence of an LHF was significantly lower in the OWDTO (26%) than in the OWHTO (80%) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed 12 months postoperatively. The Lysholm score was significantly lower for patients with LHF following OWDTO than for OWDTO patients without LHF or OWHTO patients with/without LHF 3 and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001); Lysholm score and KOOS were not different at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

LHF after OWDTO was associated with delayed bone union and poor clinical outcomes until 12 months. This information can guide decisions regarding the indications and the management of patients after OWDTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.