Practical considerations for the dosing and adjustment of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit

Familiarity with the initiation, dosing, adjustment, and termination of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a core skill for contemporary intensivists. Guidelines for how to administer CRRT in the intensive care unit are not well documented. The purpose of this review is to discuss the modalities, terminology, and components of CRRT, with an emphasis on the practical aspects of dosing, adjustments, and termination. Management of electrolyte and acid-base derangements commonly encountered with acute renal failure is emphasized. Knowledge regarding the practical aspects of managing CRRT in the intensive care unit is a prerequisite for achieving desired physiological end points.

Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD

Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD). The application of convective therapies to the outpatient setting may improve outcomes, including intradialytic hypotension. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, we randomly assigned 146 long-term dialysis patients to HD (n = 70), online predilution hemofiltration (HF; n = 36), or online predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF; n = 40). The primary end point was the frequency of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension (ISH). Compared with the run-in period, the frequency of sessions with ISH during the evaluation period increased for HD (7.1 to 7.9%) and decreased for both HF (9.8 to 8.0%) and HDF (10.6 to 5.2%) (P < 0.001). Mean predialysis systolic BP increased by 4.2 mmHg among those who were assigned to HDF compared with decreases of 0.6 and 1.8 mmHg among those who were assigned to HD and HF, respectively (P = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant risk reductions in ISH for both HF (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) and HDF (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.63). There was a trend toward higher dropout for those who were assigned to HF (P = 0.107). In conclusion, compared with conventional HD, convective therapies (HDF and HF) reduce ISH in long-term dialysis patients.

Concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin B12 and folic acid in patients treated with hemodialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration or hemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

Uncertainty has arisen as to whether vitamin supplements are needed by dialysis patients, in particular those treated by means of hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration using highly permeable (high-flux) filters. We therefore measured the concentrations of vitamin C, cobalamin (vitamin B12) and folic acid in conventional (low-flux) dialysis patients and in those receiving on-line treatment (hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plasma (P-)ascorbate, serum (S-)cobalamin and S-folate concentrations were measured before and after a treatment session in 15 patients treated with low-flux hemodialysis and in 14 treated with on-line hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration. The patients' vitamin supplementations were also recorded.

RESULTS

P-ascorbate concentrations were lowered by 51% and 53% in the hemodialysis and on-line groups, respectively after treatment and this reduction was significant (p<0.001). Concentrations below the reference values were found in 12/14 patients not receiving vitamin C supplementation. S-cobalamin did not decrease in the hemodialysis or on-line groups. S-folates did not change significantly in the hemodialysis or filtration groups. Patients without folacin supplementation had low values.

CONCLUSIONS

P-ascorbate was reduced by both dialysis and filtration treatments. Neither S-cobalamin nor S-folate were reduced by dialysis or filtration treatments.

Convective and adsorptive removal of beta2-microglobulin during predilutional and postdilutional hemofiltration

BACKGROUND

Beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2-m) removal in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is maximal with convective techniques, such as hemofiltration (HF) or hemodiafiltration (HDF). Although the infusion mode of the replacement solution (predilution or postdilution) is expected to influence the efficiency of HF, experimental data in this respect are scanty. We therefore investigated the impact of the fluid reinfusion mode on the efficiency of HF in 11 ESRD patients who underwent both treatments.

METHODS

The dialyzer (AK 200 ULTRA) was equipped with a 3-layer polyamide membrane (Poliflux 21 S, surface 2.1 m(2)) and blood flow was kept between 300 and 400 mL/min. beta2-m concentrations were measured in plasma water and ultrafiltrate at appropriate times during a 240-minute treatment. The following dialytic parameters were calculated: total amount of beta2-m removed (A(tot)), beta2-m removed by convection (A(con)) and by adsorption (A(ads)), percent reduction in beta2-m plasma water concentration (% Cpw(in)), total plasma water clearance (CLpw(tot)), convective plasma water clearance (CLpw(con)), adsorptive plasma water clearance (CLpw(ads)), and sieving coefficient (SC).

RESULTS

CLpw(tot), CLpw(ads), and% Cpw(in) were similar in pre- and postdilutional conditions, whereas CLpw(con) and SC were higher and CLpw(ads) was lower in postdilution than in predilution HF. Since a significant inverse correlation was found between A(ads) and SC, predilution probably determines greater protein fouling than postdilution.

CONCLUSION

The 2 techniques appear to be equivalent in terms of total beta2-m removal, although this final result is obtained by different contributions of convective and adsorptive elimination.

Kinetics and dosing predictions for daily haemofiltration

BACKGROUND

Thrice-weekly haemofiltration affords excellent outcome when it is used to treat chronic renal failure patients. Daily haemofiltration (DHF) has recently been proposed as a more intensive therapy option, but the total ultrafiltration or exchange volume (replacement volume plus net ultrafiltration volume) requirements for adequate solute clearances during this novel therapy are unknown.

METHODS

We calculated theoretical solute kinetic profiles during six times per week DHF for comparison with those during thrice-weekly haemodialysis using a high-flux dialyser (HFHD) or during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). HFHD and CAPD were chosen for comparison because K/DOQI guidelines have defined adequate treatment doses for these therapies. Steady-state concentrations were calculated using a two-compartment model of an anuric patient with 35 l of total body water for five solutes: urea, creatinine, vitamin B(12), inulin and beta(2)-microglobulin. Solute distribution volumes and generation rates were taken from the literature, and excess fluid (1 l/day) was assumed to accumulate in and be removed from the extracellular fluid compartment. Theoretical predictions of solute clearance were compared for a 15-l exchange volume/session during DHF, urea Kt/V of 3.6/week during HFHD and urea Kt/V of 2.0/week during CAPD as solute-specific values of the equivalent renal clearance (EKR) and standard Kt/V (stdKt/V) recently defined by Gotch. Additional comparisons of solute clearances were performed between DHF and other daily therapies including six times per week short daily haemodialysis (SDHD) and six times per week nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).

RESULTS

The calculated results predict that: (i) urea clearance during DHF with an exchange volume of 90 l/week (6x15 l) is equivalent to those during HFHD and CAPD based on urea stdKt/V; and (ii) middle molecule clearances during DHF exceed those achieved during HFHD and CAPD based on either EKR or stdKt/V. As expected, DHF therapy was inferior regarding the clearance of urea and other small solutes to SDHD and NHD; however, DHF therapy was superior to SDHD regarding the clearance of larger middle molecules, approaching the clearances achieved by NHD.

CONCLUSIONS

We predict that an exchange volume of approximately 40% of total body water (15/35 l=43%) per session will provide adequate clearance of small solutes and substantial clearance of middle molecules during six times per week DHF therapy. These theoretical predictions require clinical validation.

The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative--part VII: fluid composition and management in CRRT

Fluid composition and management are important parts of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Most commercially available CRRT solutions are able to reestablish electrolyte homeostasis provided some phosphate supplementation is given. Supraphysiologic glucose concentrations should be avoided. Predilution fluid replacement allows higher ultrafiltration rates and can be considered as an adjunct to the anticoagulation regimen. Lactate is an effective buffer in most CRRT patients. Bicarbonate is preferred in patients with lactic acidosis and/or liver failure. When citrate is used as anticoagulant, frequent monitoring of pH is required. The clinical consequences of CRRT-induced decreases of body temperature are not clear. Substitution fluid should be sterile, but the bacteriologic requirements for CRRT dialysate are less clear. There is no consensus on the optimal parameters to monitor fluid management. Integrated balancing systems have theoretical advantages over adaptive use of intravenous fluid pumps. Although there is evidence that volume overload is associated with adverse outcome, there is no evidence that fluid removal per se improves outcome in critically ill patients with or without acute renal failure.

On-line hemodiafiltration: technique and therapy

On-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides the largest amount of blood purification over a wide molecular weight spectrum achievable with present renal replacement therapies. When used with state of the art dialysis membranes and treatment systems, the biocompatibility of on-line HDF is as high as can presently be defined. From an economic perspective, the added cost of the ultrafilters used to prepare the substitution solution is balanced by the therapeutic benefits of HDF. For optimal HDF, the ultrafiltration rate must be maximized with respect to the blood flow rate. In on-line HDF systems, the excess volume ultrafiltered, approximately 20 to 30 liters per treatment, is automatically replaced, preferably in postdilution mode, by a substitution solution that is continuously generated by stepwise ultrafiltration of dialysate. When properly prepared, this fluid fulfills the quality demands of commercially available infusion solutions; that is, it can be referred to as sterile and pyrogen-free. The most important factors in preparing substitution solution are the quality of the water, of the concentrates, of the ultrafilters, and the microbiological status of the entire flow path. The clinical safety of substitution solution prepared on-line has been documented by long-term users of on-line systems. Results from clinical studies with on-line HDF confirm the overall increased clearance of solutes in relation to high-flux dialysis using the same membrane.

Principles and practice of hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration

There is growing interest in the convective dialysis therapies, hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Both require dialysis membranes which are highly permeable to solutes as well as fluid, and in both cases large volumes of ultrafiltration are the condition for convective transport. In HDF the convection is combined with diffusion, and as a consequence, maximum clearance over the entire molecular weight spectrum is achieved. Optimal forms of HDF provide urea clearance 10-15% higher than the corresponding diffusive mode. The larger the solute, the greater is the impact of convection, and beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) levels may be up to 70% reduced. Traditional postdilution HF provides high clearance of medium sized and large molecules. Satisfactory clearance of small solutes requires blood flows in excess of 500 ml/min. With access to practically unlimited volumes of substitution solution through on-line ultrafiltration, predilution HF can now be used. This increases the clearance of small solutes to an acceptable range. For HDF as well as HF, large patient populations consistently treated for longer periods of time are needed to make valid outcome comparisons with other therapies.