Involvement of the period gene in developmental time-memory: effect of the perShort mutation on phase shifts induced by light pulses delivered to Drosophila larvae

Light exposure during development affects physiology of adults in Drosophila melanogaster

Light is one of most important factors synchronizing organisms to day/night cycles in the environment. In Drosophila it is received through compound eyes, Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet, ocelli, using phospholipase C-dependent phototransduction and by deep brain photoreceptors, like Cryptochrome. Even a single light pulse during early life induces larval-time memory, which synchronizes the circadian clock and maintains daily rhythms in adult flies. In this study we investigated several processes in adult flies after maintaining their embryos, larvae and pupae in constant darkness (DD) until eclosion. We found that the lack of external light during development affects sleep time, by reduction of night sleep, and in effect shift to the daytime. However, disruption of internal CRY- dependent photoreception annuls this effect. We also observed changes in the expression of genes encoding neurotransmitters and their receptors between flies kept in different light regime. In addition, the lack of light during development results in decreasing size of mushroom bodies, involved in sleep regulation. Taking together, our results show that presence of light during early life plays a key role in brain development and affects adult behavior.

Impact of disabled circadian clock on yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti fitness and behaviors

Like other insects, Aedes aegypti displays strong daily patterns in host seeking and mating. Much of these behaviors are believed to be under the control of a circadian clock, an endogenous timekeeping mechanism relying on transcriptional/translational negative feedback loops that drive rhythmic physiology and behavior. To examine the connection between the circadian clock and various Ae. aegypti behaviors, we knocked out the core clock gene cycle using CRISPR/Cas9. We found that the rhythmic pattern and intensity of mRNA expression of seven circadian genes, including AeCyc^−/−, were altered across the day/night cycle as well as in constant darkness conditions. We further show that the mutant CYC protein is incapable of forming a dimer with CLK to stimulate per expression and that the endogenous clock is disabled in AeCyc^−/− mosquitoes. AeCyc^−/− do not display the bimodal locomotor activity pattern of wild type, have a significantly reduced response to host odor, reduced egg hatching rates, delayed embryonic development and reduced adult survival and mating success. Surprisingly however, the propensity to blood feed in AeCyc^−/− females is significantly higher than in wildtype females. Together with other recent work on the circadian clock control of key aspects of mosquito biology, our data on how cycle KO affects mosquito behavior and fitness provides a basis for further work into the pathways that connect the mosquito endogenous clock to its vector competence.

The Development and Decay of the Circadian Clock in Drosophila melanogaster

The way in which the circadian clock mechanism develops and decays throughout life is interesting for a number of reasons and may give us insight into the process of aging itself. The Drosophila model has been proven invaluable for the study of the circadian clock and development and aging. Here we review the evidence for how the Drosophila clock develops and changes throughout life, and present a new conceptual model based on the results of our recent work. Firefly luciferase lines faithfully report the output of known clock genes at the central clock level in the brain and peripherally throughout the whole body. Our results show that the clock is functioning in embryogenesis far earlier than previously thought. This central clock in the fly remains robust throughout the life of the animal and only degrades immediately prior to death. However, at the peripheral (non-central oscillator level) the clock shows weakened output as the animal ages, suggesting the possibility of the breakdown in the cohesion of the circadian network.

Development of the Molecular Circadian Clock and Its Light Sensitivity in Drosophila Melanogaster

The importance of the circadian clock for the control of behavior and physiology is well established but how and when it develops is not fully understood. Here the initial expression pattern of the key clock gene period was recorded in Drosophila from embryos in vivo, using transgenic luciferase reporters. PERIOD expression in the presumptive central-clock dorsal neurons started to oscillate in the embryo in constant darkness. In behavioral experiments, a single 12-h light pulse given during the embryonic stage synchronized adult activity rhythms, implying the early development of entrainment mechanisms. These findings suggest that the central clock is functional already during embryogenesis. In contrast to central brain expression, PERIOD in the peripheral cells or their precursors increased during the embryonic stage and peaked during the pupal stage without showing circadian oscillations. Its rhythmic expression only initiated in the adult. We conclude that cyclic expression of PERIOD in the central-clock neurons starts in the embryo, presumably in the dorsal neurons or their precursors. It is not until shortly after eclosion when cyclic and synchronized expression of PERIOD in peripheral tissues commences throughout the animal.

Circadian Synchronization and Rhythmicity in Larval Photoperception-Defective Mutants of Drosophila

A single light episode during the first larval stage can set the phase of adult Drosophila activity rhythms, showing that a light-sensitive circadian clock is functional in larvae and is capable of keeping time throughout development. These behavioral data are supported by the finding that neurons expressing clock proteins already exist in the larval brain and appear to be connected to the larval visual system. To define the photoreceptive pathways of the larval clock, the authors investigated circadian synchronization during larval stages in various visual systems and/or cryptochrome-defective strains. They show that adult activity rhythms cannot be entrained by light applied to larvae lacking both cryptochrome and the visual system, although such rhythms were entrained by larval stage-restricted temperature cycles. Larvae lacking either pathway alone were light entrainable, but the phase of the resulting adult rhythm was advanced relative to wild-type flies. Unexpectedly, adult behavioral rhythms of the glass60jand norpAP24visual system mutants that were entrained in the same conditions were found to be severely impaired, in contrast to those of the wild type. Extension of the entrainment until the adult stage restored close to wild-type behavioral rhythms in the mutants. The results show that both cryptochrome and the larval visual system participate to circadian photoreception in larvae and that mutations affecting the visual system can impair behavioral rhythmicity.

Interaction of light regimes and circadian clocks modulate timing of pre-adult developmental events in Drosophila

Background

Circadian clocks have been postulated to regulate development time in several species of insects including fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. Previously we have reported that selection for faster pre-adult development reduces development time (by ~19 h or ~11%) and clock period (by ~0.5 h), suggesting a role of circadian clocks in the regulation of development time in D. melanogaster. We reasoned that these faster developing flies could serve as a model to study stage-specific interaction of circadian clocks and developmental events with the environmental light/dark (LD) conditions. We assayed the duration of three pre-adult stages in the faster developing (FD) and control (BD) populations under a variety of light regimes that are known to modulate circadian clocks and pre-adult development time of Drosophila to examine the role of circadian clocks in the timing of pre-adult developmental stages.

Results

We find that the duration of pre-adult stages was shorter under constant light (LL) and short period light (L)/dark (D) cycles (L:D = 10:10 h; T20) compared to the standard 24 h day (L:D = 12:12 h; T24), long LD cycles (L:D = 14:14 h; T28) and constant darkness (DD). The difference in the duration of pre-adult stages between the FD and BD populations was significantly smaller under the three LD cycles and LL compared to DD, possibly due to the fact that clocks of both FD and BD flies are driven at the same pace in the three LD regimes owing to circadian entrainment, or are rendered dysfunctional under LL.

Conclusions

These results suggest that interaction between light regimes and circadian clocks regulate the duration of pre-adult developmental stages in fruit flies D. melanogaster.

Environmentally-induced modulations of developmental rates do not affect the selection-mediated changes in pre-adult development time of fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster

In a previous study we had shown that 55 generations of selection for faster egg-to-adult development in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster results in shortening of pre-adult duration by ~29-h (~12.5%) and speeding-up of circadian clock period (τ) by ~0.5-h, implying a positive correlation between development time and τ. In Drosophila, change in ambient temperature is known to alter the rate of pre-adult development but not the speed of circadian clocks whereas 12:12-h warm/cold (WC) cycles are likely to alter both pre-adult development rate and τ (via entrainment). To study the effect of overall speeding-up/slowing-down of pre-adult development and circadian clocks on the selection-mediated difference in pre-adult development time, we subjected developing flies to the following conditions: (i) different ambient temperatures (18, 25 and 29°C) under constant darkness (DD) to alter the rate of pre-adult development, or (ii) cyclic WC conditions (WC1-25:18 or WC2-29:25°C) to alter rate of development and τ. The results revealed that the selected (FD) stocks develop faster than controls (BD) by ~52, 28 and 21-h, at 18, 25 and 29°C, respectively, and by 28 and 26-h under WC1 and WC2, respectively. The τ of activity/rest rhythm decreased considerably at 18°C but it did not differ between the FD and BD flies, which suggests a break-down of correlation between development time and τ, seen under their normal rearing conditions (constant darkness--DD at 25°C). While the absolute difference in development time between FD and BD stocks increased or decreased under cooler or warmer conditions, the relative difference in their pre-adult development time remained largely unaltered. These results suggest that manipulations in ambient conditions independently changes development time and τ, resulting in a break-down of the genetic correlation between them.

Identifying specific light inputs for each subgroup of brain clock neurons in Drosophila larvae

In Drosophila, opsin visual photopigments as well as blue-light-sensitive cryptochrome (CRY) contribute to the synchronization of circadian clocks. We focused on the relatively simple larval brain, with nine clock neurons per hemisphere: five lateral neurons (LNs), four of which express the pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) neuropeptide, and two pairs of dorsal neurons (DN1s and DN2s). CRY is present only in the PDF-expressing LNs and the DN1s. The larval visual organ expresses only two rhodopsins (RH5 and RH6) and projects onto the LNs. We recently showed that PDF signaling is required for light to synchronize the CRY(-) larval DN2s. We now show that, in the absence of functional CRY, synchronization of the DN1s also requires PDF, suggesting that these neurons have no direct connection with the visual system. In contrast, the fifth (PDF(-)) LN does not require the PDF-expressing cells to receive visual system inputs. All clock neurons are light-entrained by light-dark cycles in the rh5(2);cry(b), rh6(1) cry(b), and rh5(2);rh6(1) double mutants, whereas the triple mutant is circadianly blind. Thus, any one of the three photosensitive molecules is sufficient, and there is no other light input for the larval clock. Finally, we show that constant activation of the visual system can suppress molecular oscillations in the four PDF-expressing LNs, whereas, in the adult, this effect of constant light requires CRY. A surprising diversity and specificity of light input combinations thus exists even for this simple clock network.

A role for blind DN2 clock neurons in temperature entrainment of the Drosophila larval brain

Circadian clocks synchronize to the solar day by sensing the diurnal changes in light and temperature. In adult Drosophila, the brain clock that controls rest-activity rhythms relies on neurons showing Period oscillations. Nine of these neurons are present in each larval brain hemisphere. They can receive light inputs through Cryptochrome (CRY) and the visual system, but temperature input pathways are unknown. Here, we investigate how the larval clock network responds to light and temperature. We focused on the CRY-negative dorsal neurons (DN2s), in which light-dark (LD) cycles set molecular oscillations almost in antiphase to all other clock neurons. We first showed that the phasing of the DN2s in LD depends on the pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) neuropeptide in four lateral neurons (LNs), and on the PDF receptor in the DN2s. In the absence of PDF signaling, these cells appear blind, but still synchronize to temperature cycles. Period oscillations in the DN2s were stronger in thermocycles than in LD, but with a very similar phase. Conversely, the oscillations of LNs were weaker in thermocycles than in LD, and were phase-shifted in synchrony with the DN2s, whereas the phase of the three other clock neurons was advanced by a few hours. In the absence of any other functional clock neurons, the PDF-positive LNs were entrained by LD cycles but not by temperature cycles. Our results show that the larval clock neurons respond very differently to light and temperature, and strongly suggest that the CRY-negative DN2s play a prominent role in the temperature entrainment of the network.

Circadian modulation of short-term memory in Drosophila

Endogenous biological clocks are widespread regulators of behavior and physiology, allowing for a more efficient allocation of efforts and resources over the course of a day. The extent that different processes are regulated by circadian oscillators, however, is not fully understood. We investigated the role of the circadian clock on short-term associative memory formation using a negatively reinforced olfactory-learning paradigm in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that memory formation was regulated in a circadian manner. The peak performance in short-term memory (STM) occurred during the early subjective night with a twofold performance amplitude after a single pairing of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. This rhythm in memory is eliminated in both timeless and period mutants and is absent during constant light conditions. Circadian gating of sensory perception does not appear to underlie the rhythm in short-term memory as evidenced by the nonrhythmic shock avoidance and olfactory avoidance behaviors. Moreover, central brain oscillators appear to be responsible for the modulation as cryptochrome mutants, in which the antennal circadian oscillators are nonfunctional, demonstrate robust circadian rhythms in short-term memory. Together these data suggest that central, rather than peripheral, circadian oscillators modulate the formation of short-term associative memory and not the perception of the stimuli.

Rhythm defects caused by newly engineered null mutations in Drosophila's cryptochrome gene

Much of the knowledge about cryptochrome function in Drosophila stems from analyzing the cryb mutant. Several features of this variant's light responsiveness imply either that CRYb retains circadian-photoreceptive capacities or that additional CRY-independent light-input routes subserve these processes. Potentially to resolve these issues, we generated cry knock-out mutants (cry0's) by gene replacement. They behaved in an anomalously rhythmic manner in constant light (LL). However, cry0 flies frequently exhibited two separate circadian components in LL, not observed in most previous cryb analyses. Temperature-dependent circadian phenotypes exhibited by cry(0) flies suggest that CRY is involved in core pacemaking. Further locomotor experiments combined cry0 with an externally blinding mutation (norpAP24), which caused the most severe decrements of circadian photoreception observed so far. cryb cultures were shown previously to exhibit either aperiodic or rhythmic eclosion in separate studies. We found cry0 to eclose in a solidly periodic manner in light:dark cycles or constant darkness. Furthermore, both cry0 and cryb eclosed rhythmically in LL. These findings indicate that the novel cry0 type causes more profound defects than does the cryb mutation, implying that CRYb retains residual activity. Because some norpAP24 cry0 individuals can resynchronize to novel photic regimes, an as-yet undetermined light-input route exists in Drosophila.

Clock-gated photic stimulation of timeless expression at cold temperatures and seasonal adaptation in Drosophila

Numerous lines of evidence indicate that the initial photoresponse of the circadian clock in Drosophila melanogaster is the light-induced degradation of TIMELESS (TIM). This posttranslational mechanism is in sharp contrast to the well-characterized pacemakers in mammals and Neurospora, where light evokes rapid changes in the transcriptional profiles of 1 or more clock genes. The authors show that light has novel effects on D. melanogaster circadian pacemakers, acutely stimulating the expression of tim at cold but not warm temperatures. This photoinduction occurs in flies defective for the classic visual phototransduction pathway or the circadian-relevant photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY). Cold-specific stimulation of tim RNA abundance is regulated at the transcriptional level, and although numerous lines of evidence indicate that period (per) and tim expression are activated by the same mechanism, light has no measurable acute effect on per mRNA abundance. Moreover, light-induced increases in the levels of tim RNA are abolished or greatly reduced in the absence of functional CLOCK (CLK) or CYCLE (CYC) but not PER or TIM. These findings add to a growing number of examples where molecular and behavioral photoresponses in Drosophila are differentially influenced by "positive" (e.g., CLK and CYC) and "negative" (e.g., PER and TIM) core clock elements. The acute effects of light on tim expression are temporally gated, essentially restricted to the daily rising phase in tim mRNA levels. Because the start of the daily upswing in tim expression begins several hours after dawn in long photoperiods (day length), this gating mechanism likely ensures that sunrise does not prematurely stimulate tim expression during unseasonally cold spring/summer days. The results suggest that the photic stimulation of tim expression at low temperatures is part of a seasonal adaptive response that helps advance the phase of the clock on cold days, enabling flies to exhibit preferential daytime activity despite the (usually) earlier onset of dusk. Taken together with prior findings, the ability of temperature and photoperiod to adjust trajectories in the rising phases of 1 or more clock RNAs constitutes a major mechanism contributing to seasonal adaptation of clock function.

The circadian system of Drosophila melanogaster and its light input pathways

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been a grateful object for circadian rhythm researchers over several decades. Behavioral, genetic, and molecular studies in the little fly have aided in understanding the bases of circadian time keeping and rhythmic behaviors not only in Drosophila, but also in other organisms, including mammals. This review summarizes our present knowledge about the fruit fly's circadian system at the molecular and neurobiological level, with special emphasis on its entrainment by environmental light-dark cycles. The results obtained for Drosophila are discussed with respect to parallel findings in mammals.

Start the clock! Circadian rhythms and development

The contribution of timing cues from the environment to the coordination of early developmental processes is poorly understood. The day-night cycle represents one of the most important, regular environmental changes that animals are exposed to. A key adaptation that allows animals to anticipate daily environmental changes is the circadian clock. In this review, we aim to address when a light-regulated circadian clock first emerges during development and what its functions are at this early stage. In particular, do circadian clocks regulate early developmental processes? We will focus on results obtained with Drosophila and vertebrates, where both circadian clock and developmental control mechanisms have been intensively studied.

Membrane electrical excitability is necessary for the free-running larval Drosophila circadian clock

Drosophila larvae and adult pacemaker neurons both express free-running oscillations of period (PER) and timeless (TIM) proteins that constitute the core of the cell-autonomous circadian molecular clock. Despite similarities between the adult and larval molecular oscillators, adults and larvae differ substantially in the complexity and organization of their pacemaker neural circuits, as well as in behavioral manifestations of circadian rhythmicity. We have shown previously that electrical silencing of adult Drosophila circadian pacemaker neurons through targeted expression of either an open rectifier or inward rectifier K(+) channel stops the free-running oscillations of the circadian molecular clock. This indicates that neuronal electrical activity in the pacemaker neurons is essential to the normal function of the adult intracellular clock. In the current study, we show that in constant darkness the free-running larval pacemaker clock-like that of the adult pacemaker neurons they give rise to-requires membrane electrical activity to oscillate. In contrast to the free-running clock, the molecular clock of electrically silenced larval pacemaker neurons continues to oscillate in diurnal (light-dark) conditions. This specific disruption of the free-running clock caused by targeted K(+) channel expression likely reflects a specific cell-autonomous clock-membrane feedback loop that is common to both larval and adult neurons, and is not due to blocking pacemaker synaptic outputs or disruption of pacemaker neuronal morphology.

Circadian pacemaker neurons transmit and modulate visual information to control a rapid behavioral response

Circadian pacemaker neurons contain a molecular clock that oscillates with a period of approximately 24 hr, controlling circadian rhythms of behavior. Pacemaker neurons respond to visual system inputs for clock resetting, but, unlike other neurons, have not been reported to transmit rapid signals to their targets. Here we show that pacemaker neurons are required to mediate a rapid behavior. The Drosophila larval visual system, Bolwig's organ (BO), projects to larval pacemaker neurons to entrain their clock. BO also mediates larval photophobic behavior. We found that ablation or electrical silencing of larval pacemaker neurons abolished light avoidance. Thus, circadian pacemaker neurons receive input from BO not only to reset the clock but also to transmit rapid photophobic signals. Furthermore, as clock gene mutations also affect photophobicity, the pacemaker neurons modulate the sensitivity of larvae to light, generating a circadian rhythm in visual sensitivity.

Quantitative trait loci for sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana

Sexual isolating mechanisms that act before fertilization are often considered the most important genetic barriers leading to speciation in animals. While recent progress has been made toward understanding the genetic basis of the postzygotic isolating mechanisms of hybrid sterility and inviability, little is known about the genetic basis of prezygotic sexual isolation. Here, we map quantitative trait loci (QTL) contributing to prezygotic reproductive isolation between the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. We mapped at least seven QTL affecting discrimination of D. mauritiana females against D. simulans males, three QTL affecting D. simulans male traits against which D. mauritiana females discriminate, and six QTL affecting D. mauritiana male traits against which D. simulans females discriminate. QTL affecting sexual isolation act additively, are largely different in males and females, and are not disproportionately concentrated on the X chromosome: The QTL of greatest effect are located on chromosome 3. Unlike the genetic components of postzygotic isolation, the loci for prezygotic isolation do not interact epistatically. The observation of a few QTL with moderate to large effects will facilitate positional cloning of genes underlying sexual isolation.

Systems approaches to biological rhythms in Drosophila

The chronobiological system of Drosophila is considered from the perspective of rhythm-regulated genes. These factors are enumerated and discussed not so much in terms of how the gene products are thought to act on behalf of circadian-clock mechanisms, but with special emphasis on where these molecules are manufactured within the organism. Therefore, with respect to several such cell and tissue types in the fly head, what is the "systems meaning" of a given structure's function insofar as regulation of rest-activity cycles is concerned? (Systematic oscillation of daily behavior is the principal overt phenotype analyzed in studies of Drosophila chronobiology). In turn, how do the several separate sets of clock-gene-expressing cells interact--or in some cases act in parallel--such that intricacies of the fly's sleep-wake cycles are mediated? Studying Drosophila chrono-genetics as a system-based endeavor also encompasses the fact that rhythm-related genes generate their products in many tissues beyond neural ones and during all stages of the life cycle. What, then, is the meaning of these widespread gene-expression patterns? This question is addressed with regard to circadian rhythms outside the behavioral arena, by considering other kinds of temporally based behaviors, and by contemplating how broadly systemic expression of rhythm-related genes connects with even more pleiotropic features of Drosophila biology. Thus, chronobiologically connected factors functioning within this insect comprise an increasingly salient example of gene versatility--multi-faceted usages of, and complex interactions among, entities that set up an organism's overall wherewithal to form and function. A corollary is that studying Drosophila development and adult-fly actions, even when limited to analysis of rhythm-systems phenomena, involves many of the animal's tissues and phenotypic capacities. It follows that such chronobiological experiments are technically demanding, including the necessity for investigators to possess wide-ranging expertise. Therefore, this chapter includes several different kinds of Methods set-asides. These techniques primers necessarily lack comprehensiveness, but they include certain discursive passages about why a given method can or should be applied and concerning real-world applicability of the pertinent rhythm-related technologies.

Noncircadian regulation and function of clock genes period and timeless in oogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster

Circadian clock genes are ubiquitously expressed in the nervous system and peripheral tissues of complex animals. While clock genes in the brain are essential for behavioral rhythms, the physiological roles of these genes in the periphery are not well understood. Constitutive expression of the clock gene period was reported in the ovaries of Drosophila melanogaster; however, its molecular interactions and functional significance remained unknown. This study demonstrates that period (per) and timeless (tim) are involved in a novel noncircadian function in the ovary. PER and TIM are constantly expressed in the follicle cells enveloping young oocytes. Genetic evidence suggests that PER and TIM interact in these cells, yet they do not translocate to the nucleus. The levels of TIM and PER in the ovary are affected neither by light nor by the lack of clock-positive elements Clock (Clk) and cycle (cyc). Taken together, these data suggest that per and tim are regulated differently in follicle cells than in clock cells. Experimental evidence suggests that a novel fitness-related phenotype may be linked to noncircadian expression of clock genes in the ovaries. Mated females lacking either per or tim show nearly a 50% decline in progeny, and virgin females show a similar decline in the production of mature oocytes. Disruption of circadian mechanism by either the depletion of TIM via constant light treatment or continuous expression of PER via GAL4/UAS expression system has no adverse effect on the production of mature oocytes.

Novel features of cryptochrome-mediated photoreception in the brain circadian clock of Drosophila

In Drosophila, light affects circadian behavioral rhythms via at least two distinct mechanisms. One of them relies on the visual phototransduction cascade. The other involves a presumptive photopigment, cryptochrome (cry), expressed in lateral brain neurons that control behavioral rhythms. We show here that cry is expressed in most, if not all, larval and adult neuronal groups expressing the PERIOD (PER) protein, with the notable exception of larval dorsal neurons (DN2s) in which PER cycles in antiphase to all other known cells. Forcing cry expression in the larval DN2s gave them a normal phase of PER cycling, indicating that their unique antiphase rhythm is related to their lack of cry expression. We were able to directly monitor CRY protein in Drosophila brains in situ. It appeared highly unstable in the light, whereas in the dark, it accumulated in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, including some neuritic projections. We also show that dorsal PER-expressing brain neurons, the adult DN1s, are the only brain neurons to coexpress the CRY protein and the photoreceptor differentiation factor GLASS. Studies of various visual system mutants and their combination with the cry(b) mutation indicated that the adult DN1s contribute significantly to the light sensitivity of the clock controlling activity rhythms, and that this contribution depends on CRY. Moreover, all CRY-independent light inputs into this central behavioral clock were found to require the visual system. Finally, we show that the photoreceptive DN1 neurons do not behave as autonomous oscillators, because their PER oscillations in constant darkness rapidly damp out in the absence of pigment-dispersing-factor signaling from the ventral lateral neurons.

Splicing of the period gene 3'-terminal intron is regulated by light, circadian clock factors, and phospholipase C

The daily timing of circadian ( congruent with 24-h) controlled activity in many animals exhibits seasonal adjustments, responding to changes in photoperiod (day length) and temperature. In Drosophila melanogaster, splicing of an intron in the 3' untranslated region of the period (per) mRNA is enhanced at cold temperatures, leading to more rapid daily increases in per transcript levels and earlier "evening" activity. Here we show that daily fluctuations in the splicing of this intron (herein referred to as dmpi8) are regulated by the clock in a manner that depends on the photoperiod (day length) and temperature. Shortening the photoperiod enhances dmpi8 splicing and advances its cycle, whereas the amplitude of the clock-regulated daytime decline in splicing increases as temperatures rise. This suggests that at elevated temperatures the clock has a more pronounced role in maintaining low splicing during the day, a mechanism that likely minimizes the deleterious effects of daytime heat on the flies by favoring nocturnal activity during warm days. Light also has acute inhibitory effects, rapidly decreasing the proportion of dmpi8-spliced per transcript, a response that does not require a functional clock. Our results identify a novel nonphotic role for phospholipase C (no-receptor-potential-A [norpA]) in the temperature regulation of dmpi8 splicing.

Acetylcholine increases intracellular Ca2+ via nicotinic receptors in cultured PDF-containing clock neurons of Drosophila

Light entrains the biological clock both in adult and larval Drosophila melanogaster. The Bolwig organ photoreceptors most likely constitute one substrate for this light entrainment in larvae. Acetylcholine (ACh) has been suggested as the neurotransmitter in these photoreceptors, but there is no evidence that ACh signaling is involved in photic input onto circadian pacemaker neurons. Here we demonstrate that the putative targets of the Bolwig photoreceptors, the PDF-containing clock neurons (LNs), in the larval brain express functional ACh receptors (AChRs). With the use of GAL4-UAS-driven expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP), we were able to identify LNs in dissociated cell culture. After loading with the Ca(2+)-sensitive dye fura-2, we monitored changes in intracellular Ca(2+) levels ([Ca(2+)](i)) in GFP-marked LNs while applying candidate neurotransmitters. ACh induced transient increases in [Ca(2+)](i) at physiological concentrations. These increases were dependent on extracellular Ca(2+) and Na(+) and were likely caused by activation of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels. Application of nicotinic and muscarinic agonists and antagonists showed that the AChRs on cultured LNs have a nicotinic pharmacology. Antibodies to several subunits of nicotinic AChRs (nAChRs) labeled the putative contact site of the Bolwig organ axon terminals with the dendrites of LNs, as well as dissociated LNs in culture. Our findings support a role of ACh as input factor onto the LNs and suggest that Ca(2+) is used as a second messenger mediating cholinergic input within the LNs. Experiments using a more general GAL4-UAS-driven expression of GFP showed that functional expression of nAChRs is a widespread phenomenon in peptidergic neurons.

The neuroarchitecture of the circadian clock in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster

Neuroethologists try to assign behavioral functions to certain brain centers, if possible down to individual neurons and to the expression of specific genes. This approach has been successfully applied for the control of circadian rhythmic behavior in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Several so-called "clock genes" are expressed in specific neurons in the lateral and dorsal brain where they generate cell-autonomous molecular circadian oscillations. These clusters are connected with each other and contribute differentially to the control of behavioral rhythmicity. This report reviews the latest work on characterizing individual circadian pacemaker neurons in the fruit fly's brain that control activity and pupal eclosion, leading to the questions by which neuronal pathways they are synchronized to the external light-dark cycle, and how they impose periodicity on behavior.

Genetics and molecular biology of rhythms in Drosophila and other insects

Application of generic variants (Sections II-IV, VI, and IX) and molecular manipulations of rhythm-related genes (Sections V-X) have been used extensively to investigate features of insect chronobiology that might not have been experimentally accessible otherwise. Most such tests of mutants and molecular-genetic xperiments have been performed in Drosophila melanogaster. Results from applying visual-system variants have revealed that environmental inputs to the circadian clock in adult flies are mediated by external photoreceptive structures (Section II) and also by direct light reception chat occurs in certain brain neurons (Section IX). The relevant light-absorbing molecuLes are rhodopsins and "blue-receptive" cryptochrome (Sections II and IX). Variations in temperature are another clock input (Section IV), as has been analyzed in part by use of molecular techniques and transgenes involving factors functioning near the heart of the circadian clock (Section VIII). At that location within the fly's chronobiological system, approximately a half-dozen-perhaps up to as many as 10-clock genes encode functions that act and interact to form the circadian pacemaker (Sections III and V). This entity functions in part by transcriptional control of certain clock genes' expressions, which result in the production of key proteins that feed back negatively to regulate their own mRNA production. This occurs in part by interactions of such proteins with others that function as transcriptional activators (Section V). The implied feedback loop operates such that there are daily variations in the abundances of products put out by about one-half of the core clock genes. Thus, the normal expression of these genes defines circadian rhythms of their own, paralleling the effects of mutations at the corresponding genetic loci (Section III), which are to disrupt or apparently eliminate clock functioning. The fluctuations in the abundance of gene products are controlled transciptionally and posttranscriptionally. These clock mechanisms are being analyzed in ways that are increasingly complex and occasionally obscure; not all panels of this picture are comprehensive or clear, including problems revolving round the biological meaning or a given features of all this molecular cycling (Section V). Among the complexities and puzzles that have recently arisen, phenomena that stand out are posttranslational modifications of certain proteins that are circadianly regulated and regulating; these biochemical events form an ancillary component of the clock mechanism, as revealed in part by genetic identification of Factors (Section III) that turned out to encode protein kinases whose substrates include other pacemaking polypeptides (Section V). Outputs from insect circadian clocks have been long defined on formalistic and in some cases concrete criteria, related to revealed rhythms such as periodic eclosion and daily fluctuations of locomotion (Sections II and III). Based on the reasoning that if clock genes can regulate circadian cyclings of their own products, they can do the same for genes that function along output pathways; thus clock-regulated genes have been identified in part by virtue of their products' oscillations (Section X). Those studied most intensively have their expression influenced by circadian-pacemaker mutations. The clock-regulated genes discovered on molecular criteria have in some instances been analyzed further in their mutant forms and found to affect certain features of overt whole-organismal rhythmicity (Sections IV and X). Insect chronogenetics touches in part on naturally occurring gene variations that affect biological rhythmicity or (in some cases) have otherwise informed investigators about certain features of the organism's rhythm system (Section VII). Such animals include at least a dozen insect species other than D. melanogaster in which rhythm variants have been encountered (although usually not looked for systematically). The chronobiological "system" in the fruit fly might better be graced with a plural appellation because there is a myriad of temporally related phenomena that have come under the sway of one kind of putative rhythm variant or the other (Section IV). These phenotypes, which range well beyond the bedrock eclosion and locomotor circadian rhythms, unfortunately lead to the creation of a laundry list of underanalyzed or occult phenomena that may or may not be inherently real, whether or not they might be meaningfully defective under the influence of a given chronogenetic variant. However, such mutants seem to lend themselves to the interrogation of a wide variety of time-based attributes-those that fall within the experimental confines of conventionally appreciated circadian rhythms (Sections II, III, VI, and X); and others that consist of 24-hr or nondaily cycles defined by many kinds of biological, physiological, or biochemical parameters (Section IV).

Genetic analysis of the circadian system in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been a grateful object for circadian rhythm researchers over several decades. Behavioral, genetic, and molecular studies helped to reveal the genetic bases of circadian time keeping and rhythmic behaviors. Contrary, mammalian rhythm research until recently was mainly restricted to descriptive and physiologic approaches. As in many other areas of research, the surprising similarity of basic biologic principles between the little fly and our own species, boosted the progress of unraveling the genetic foundation of mammalian clock mechanisms. Once more, not only the basic mechanisms, but also the molecules involved in establishing our circadian system are taken or adapted from the fly. This review will try to give a comparative overview about the two systems, highlighting similarities as well as specifics of both insect and murine clocks.

The extraretinal eyelet of Drosophila: development, ultrastructure, and putative circadian function

Circadian rhythms can be entrained by light to follow the daily solar cycle. In Drosophila melanogaster a pair of extraretinal eyelets expressing immunoreactivity to Rhodopsin 6 each contains four photoreceptors located beneath the posterior margin of the compound eye. Their axons project to the region of the pacemaker center in the brain with a trajectory resembling that of Bolwig's organ, the visual organ of the larva. A lacZ reporter line driven by an upstream fragment of the developmental gap gene Krüppel is a specific enhancer element for Bolwig's organ. Expression of immunoreactivity to the product of lacZ in Bolwig's organ persists through pupal metamorphosis and survives in the adult eyelet. We thus demonstrate that eyelet derives from the 12 photoreceptors of Bolwig's organ, which entrain circadian rhythmicity in the larva. Double labeling with anti-pigment-dispersing hormone shows that the terminals of Bolwig's nerve differentiate during metamorphosis in close temporal and spatial relationship to the ventral lateral neurons (LN(v)), which are essential to express circadian rhythmicity in the adult. Bolwig's organ also expresses immunoreactivity to Rhodopsin 6, which thus continues in eyelet. We compared action spectra of entrainment in different fly strains: in flies lacking compound eyes but retaining eyelet (so(1)), lacking both compound eyes and eyelet (so(1);gl(60j)), and retaining eyelet but lacking compound eyes as well as cryptochrome (so(1);cry(b)). Responses to phase shifts suggest that, in the absence of compound eyes, eyelet together with cryptochrome mainly mediates phase delays. Thus a functional role in circadian entrainment first found in Bolwig's organ in the larva is retained in eyelet, the adult remnant of Bolwig's organ, even in the face of metamorphic restructuring.

Electrical silencing of Drosophila pacemaker neurons stops the free-running circadian clock

Electrical silencing of Drosophila circadian pacemaker neurons through targeted expression of K+ channels causes severe deficits in free-running circadian locomotor rhythmicity in complete darkness. Pacemaker electrical silencing also stops the free-running oscillation of PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) proteins that constitutes the core of the cell-autonomous molecular clock. In contrast, electrical silencing fails to abolish PER and TIM oscillation in light-dark cycles, although it does impair rhythmic behavior. On the basis of these findings, we propose that electrical activity is an essential element of the free-running molecular clock of pacemaker neurons along with the transcription factors and regulatory enzymes that have been previously identified as required for clock function.

Larval optic nerve and adult extra-retinal photoreceptors sequentially associate with clock neurons during Drosophila brain development

The visual system is one of the input pathways for light into the circadian clock of the Drosophila brain. In particular, extra-retinal visual structures have been proposed to play a role in both larval and adult circadian photoreception. We have analyzed the interactions between extra-retinal structures of the visual system and the clock neurons during brain development. We first show that the larval optic nerve, or Bolwig nerve, already contacts clock cells (the lateral neurons) in the embryonic brain. Analysis of visual system-defective genotypes showed that the absence of the afferent Bolwig nerve resulted in a severe reduction of the lateral neurons dendritic arborization, and that the inhibition of nerve activity induced alterations of the dendritic morphology. During wild-type development, the loss of a functional Bolwig nerve in the early pupa was also accompanied by remodeling of the arborization of the lateral neurons. Approximately 1.5 days later, visual fibers that came from the Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet, a putative photoreceptive organ for the adult circadian clock, were seen contacting the lateral neurons. Both types of extra-retinal photoreceptors expressed rhodopsins RH5 and RH6, as well as the norpA-encoded phospholipase C. These data strongly suggest a role for RH5 and RH6, as well as NORPA, signaling in both larval and adult extra-retinal circadian photoreception. The Hofbauer-Buchner eyelet therefore does not appear to account for the previously described norpA-independent light input to the adult clock. This supports the existence of yet uncharacterized photoreceptive structures in Drosophila.

The regulation of circadian clocks by light in fruitflies and mice

A circadian clock has no survival value unless biological time is adjusted (entrained) to local time and, for most organisms, the profound changes in the light environment provide the local time signal (zeitgeber). Over 24 h, the amount of light, its spectral composition and its direction change in a systematic way. In theory, all of these features could be used for entrainment, but each would be subject to considerable variation or 'noise'. Despite this high degree of environmental noise, entrained organisms show remarkable precision in their daily activities. Thus, the photosensory task of entrainment is likely to be very complex, but fundamentally similar for all organisms. To test this hypothesis we compare the photoreceptors that mediate entrainment in both flies and mice, and assess their degree of convergence. Although superficially different, both organisms use specialized (employing novel photopigments) and complex (using multiple photopigments) photoreceptor mechanisms. We conclude that this multiplicity of photic inputs, in highly divergent organisms, must relate to the complex sensory task of using light as a zeitgeber.

Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour

Genes are understandably crucial to physiology, morphology and biochemistry, but the idea of genes contributing to individual differences in behaviour once seemed outrageous. Nevertheless, some scientists have aspired to understand the relationship between genes and behaviour, and their research has become increasingly informative and productive over the past several decades. At the forefront of behavioural genetics research is the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, which has provided us with important insights into the molecular, cellular and evolutionary bases of behaviour.

Molecular components of the circadian system in Drosophila

Much of our current understanding of how circadian rhythms are generated is based on work done with Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular mechanisms used to assemble an endogenous clock in this organism are now known to underlie circadian rhythms in many other species, including mammals. The genetic amenability of Drosophila has led to the identification of some genes that encode components of the clock (so-called clock genes) and others that either link the clock to the environment or act downstream of it. The clock provides time-of-day cues by regulating levels of specific gene products such that they oscillate with a circadian rhythm. The mechanisms that synchronize these oscillations to light are understood to some extent. However, there are still large gaps in our knowledge, in particular with respect to the mechanisms used by the clock to control overt rhythms. It has, however, become clear that in addition to the brain clock, autonomous or semi-autonomous clocks occur in peripheral tissues where they confer circadian regulation on specific functions.

Circadian photoreception in Drosophila: functions of cryptochrome in peripheral and central clocks

In Drosophila melanogaster, disruption of night by even short light exposures results in degradation of the clock protein TIMELESS (TIM), leading to shifts in the fly molecular and behavioral rhythms. Several lines of evidence indicate that light entrainment of the brain clock involves the blue-light photoreceptor cryptochrome (CRY). In cryptochrome-depleted Drosophila (cry(b)), the entrainment of the brain clock by short light pulses is impaired but the clock is still entrainable by light-dark cycles, probably due to light input from the visual system. Whether cryptochrome and visual transduction pathways play a role in entrainment of noninnervated, directly photosensitive peripheral clocks is not known and the subject of this study. The authors monitored levels of the clock protein TIM in the lateral neurons (LNs) of larval brains and in the renal Malpighian tubules (MTs) of flies mutant for the cryptochrome gene (cry(b)) and in mutants that lack signaling from the visual photopigments (norpA(P41)). In cry(b) flies, light applied during the dark period failed to induce degradation of TIM both in MTs and in LNs, yet attenuated cycling of TIM was observed in both tissues in LD. This cycling was abolished in LNs, but persisted in MTs, of norpA(P41);cry(b) double mutants. Furthermore, the activity of the tim gene in the MTs of cry(b) flies, reported by luciferase, seemed stimulated by lights-on and suppressed by lights-off, suggesting that the absence of functional cryptochrome uncovered an additional light-sensitive pathway synchronizing the expression of TIM in this tissue. In constant darkness, cycling of TIM was abolished in MTs; however, it persisted in LNs of cry(b) flies. The authors conclude that cryptochrome is involved in TIM-mediated entrainment of both central LN and peripheral MT clocks. Cryptochrome is also an indispensable component of the endogenous clock mechanism in the examined peripheral tissue, but not in the brain. Thus, although neural and epithelial cells share the core clock mechanism, some clock components and light-entrainment pathways appear to have tissue-specific roles.

Cryptochromes: sensory reception, transduction, and clock functions subserving circadian systems

Cryptochromes (CRYs) are blue-light-absorbing proteins involved in a variety of biological phenomena. In animals, CRYs exhibit a certain versatility with regard to these organisms' circadian rhythms, as has been revealed by the effects of mutations and molecular manipulations. The rhythm system of Drosophila uses one gene's worth of CRY protein to transmit light into a circadian clock within the brain, which controls the fly's sleep-wake cycles. In fact, the relevant pacemaking neurons are themselves circadian photoreceptive structures. In peripheral tissues and others located posterior to the brain, Drosophila CRY may be a photoreceptive molecule and also part of the pacemaker mechanism. Mice have two CRY-encoding genes. They are expressed in many tissues, including the retina and a clock structure within the brain. In the former location, mouse CRY may play a circadian-photoreceptive role, along with that mediated by rhodopsins found elsewhere in the retina. In the latter tissue, the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus, mouse CRYs are closely connected to the multimolecule murine clock mechanism.

Disruption of synaptic transmission or clock-gene-product oscillations in circadian pacemaker cells of Drosophila cause abnormal behavioral rhythms

To study the function of clock-gene-expressing neurons, the tetanus-toxin light chain (TeTxLC), which blocks chemical synaptic transmission, was expressed under the control of promoters of the clock genes period (per) and timeless (tim), each fused to GAL4-encoding sequences. Although TeTxLC did not affect cycling of a clock-gene product at the gross level, it disrupted the rhythmic behavior of adult Drosophila. In constant darkness, the proportion of rhythmic flies was reduced in flies expressing active TeTxLC compared to controls, including those expressing inactive toxin. The behavior of TeTxLC-expressing flies was less synchronized to light:dark cycles than that of controls. To determine which neurons are responsible for these effects on behavior, the toxin was also expressed in restricted subsets of per/tim-expressing, laterally located pacemaker neurons by expressing TeTxLC under the control of a driver in which GAL4-encoding sequences are fused to the promoter of the pigment dispersing factor (pdf) gene. pdf-gal4-driven TeTxLC expression had relatively little effect on behavioral rhythms, implying that per/tim neurons other than pdf-expressing lateral neurons participate in the generation of rhythmic behavior. In another set of experiments, period gene products were expressed under the control of per-gal4 or tim-gal4. This resulted in an increased level of PER protein in many brain cells and reduction of bioluminescence cycling reported by a per-luciferase transgene, especially in the case of per expression affected by tim-gal4. This indicates a disruption of the transcriptional feedback loop that is a part of the oscillatory mechanism underlying Drosophila's circadian rhythms. Consistent with this molecular defect, the proportion of rhythmic individuals in constant darkness was subnormal in flies expressing PER under the control of tim-gal4, and their behavior in light:dark cycles was abnormal.

Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila

Regulation of the Drosophila pigment-dispersing factor (pdf) gene products was analyzed in wild-type and clock mutants. Mutations in the transcription factors CLOCK and CYCLE severely diminish pdf RNA and neuropeptide (PDF) levels in a single cluster of clock-gene-expressing brain cells, called small ventrolateral neurons (s-LN(v)s). This clock-gene regulation of specific cells does not operate through an E-box found within pdf regulatory sequences. PDF immunoreactivity exhibits daily cycling, but only within terminals of axons projecting from the s-LN(v)s. This posttranslational rhythm is eliminated by period or timeless null mutations, which do not affect PDF staining in cell bodies or pdf mRNA levels. Therefore, within these chronobiologically important neurons, separate elements of the central pacemaking machinery regulate pdf or its product in novel and different ways. Coupled with contemporary results showing a pdf-null mutant to be severely defective in its behavioral rhythmicity, the present results reveal PDF as an important circadian mediator whose expression and function are downstream of the clockworks.

Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila

Regulation of the Drosophila pigment-dispersing factor (pdf) gene products was analyzed in wild-type and clock mutants. Mutations in the transcription factors CLOCK and CYCLE severely diminish pdf RNA and neuropeptide (PDF) levels in a single cluster of clock-gene-expressing brain cells, called small ventrolateral neurons (s-LN(v)s). This clock-gene regulation of specific cells does not operate through an E-box found within pdf regulatory sequences. PDF immunoreactivity exhibits daily cycling, but only within terminals of axons projecting from the s-LN(v)s. This posttranslational rhythm is eliminated by period or timeless null mutations, which do not affect PDF staining in cell bodies or pdf mRNA levels. Therefore, within these chronobiologically important neurons, separate elements of the central pacemaking machinery regulate pdf or its product in novel and different ways. Coupled with contemporary results showing a pdf-null mutant to be severely defective in its behavioral rhythmicity, the present results reveal PDF as an important circadian mediator whose expression and function are downstream of the clockworks.