Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cohort study

Rethinking the use of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are at high risk for recurrent thrombosis, and indefinite anticoagulation is recommended. Patients with APS merit indefinite anticoagulation, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have historically been the standard treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present an appealing alternative to VKAs. Due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, DOACs offer advantages over VKAs, namely the lack of need for laboratory monitoring, the usage of a fixed dosage, and the absence of significant interaction with dietary components and drugs. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with APS have been studied in four phase II/III clinical trials (three with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban). These studies showed DOACs' inferiority compared to VKAs in preventing recurrent thrombosis. Recurrence was significantly greater in patients with arterial thrombotic events and a triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies. No differences were observed in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between both groups. Major bleeding was similar in patients treated with DOACs or VKAs. Several observational studies have reported similar results. This review aims to analyse the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in patients with APS.

Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Current guidelines recommend that direct anticoagulants should not be used in prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, except for triple-positive APS and rivaroxaban use, little evidence supports such recommendation. In a real-life cohort study, we evaluated the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with APS on apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We enrolled 152 patients with APS (aged 44 years [interquartile range 36-56], 83% women), including 66 patients treated with apixaban 5 mg bid and 86 with warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR] 2-3). During a median follow-up of 53 months, we recorded venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding. We observed 4 thrombotic events (6.1%, 3 venous thromboembolism and 1 ischemic stroke) in patients on apixaban and 12 events (14%, 9 venous thromboembolism, 2 ischemic strokes and 1 myocardial infarction) in VKA patients. Patients with APS on apixaban had similar risk of recurrent thromboembolism compared with those on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.327, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.104-1.035). Thromboembolic events occurred less commonly in statin users (8% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and more frequently in triple-positive APS (50% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.028) and in patients with higher D-dimer at baseline ( P = 0.023); the latter difference was present in the apixaban group ( P = 0.02). Patients on apixaban had similar risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.201-1.448). In real-life patients with APS, apixaban appears to be similar to VKA for the prevention of thromboembolism and risk of bleeding, which might suggest that some patients with APS could be treated with apixaban.

Direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of venous thrombosis: illustrated review of appropriate use

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the preferred option for treatment of venous thromboembolism due to their favorable profile compared with other agents such as vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin. However, findings from randomized controlled trials suggest efficacy and/or safety concerns with DOAC use in some clinical contexts. This illustrated review will summarize indications where DOACs have proven efficacy and safety, situations where they fall short, and situations where uncertainty remains compared with other treatments for venous thromboembolism.

A young woman with acute coronary syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome. Is it the antiphospholipid syndrome or COVID-19 vaccination or classical risk as the risk factor? a case report

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in young women is poorly understood due to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. One of the possible risk factors for ACS in young women is antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination also emerged as one of the possible risk factors for ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our patient, a 39-year-old Batak woman with dyslipidemia and family history of cardiovascular disease, experienced chest pain slightly improved at rest accompanied by autonomic symptoms. She was diagnosed with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on her clinical features, dynamic electrocardiogram changes, troponin elevation, and multislice computed tomography angiography confirmed with diagnostic catheterization. The patient was managed by percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents. On follow-up, the patient was diagnosed with APS based on history of preeclampsia with severe features in the first and third pregnancy, spontaneous abortion in the second pregnancy, history of transient ischemic attack, moderately positive lupus anticoagulant on two occasions with an interval of 12 weeks, and ACS. Further investigation revealed a history of COVID-19 vaccination with Sinovac four and six weeks before presentation. The patient was recommended for lifelong warfarin and short-term dual antiplatelet (aspirin and ticagrelor).

CONCLUSIONS

Young women are not completely immune to ACS as evident in this case of ACS in a young woman with classical risk factors (dyslipidemia and family history of cardiovascular disease) and APS. Further studies are required to fill the knowledge gap on whether COVID-19 vaccination had any contribution to the ACS in the young woman.

Antithrombotic therapy in antiphospholipid syndrome with arterial thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction

The optimal secondary thromboprophylactic strategies for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and arterial thrombosis remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of various antithrombotic strategies in APS with arterial thrombosis.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception until 30 September 2022, with no language restrictions. The inclusion criteria for eligible studies were as follows: inclusion of APS patients with arterial thrombosis, treatment with either antiplatelet agents, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), or a combination of these therapies, and reporting of recurrent thrombotic events.

Results

We conducted a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) involving 13 studies with a total of 719 participants, comprising six randomized and seven non-randomized studies. In comparison to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), the combined use of antiplatelet and warfarin demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent overall thrombosis, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.41 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.85). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) showed a lower risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis compared to SAPT although the difference did not reach statistical significance, with an RR of 0.29 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.07). DOAC was associated with a significant increase in the risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis, with an RR of 4.06 (95% CI 1.33 to 12.40) when compared to SAPT. There was no significant difference in major bleeding among various antithrombotic strategies.

Discussion

Based on this NMA, the combination of warfarin and antiplatelet therapy appears to be an effective approach in preventing recurrent overall thrombosis in APS patients with a history of arterial thrombosis. While DAPT may also show promise in preventing recurrent arterial thrombosis, further studies are needed to confirm its efficacy. Conversely, the use of DOACs was found to significantly increase the risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review

The objective of the systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the prophylaxis of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We searched for clinical trials, cohort studies and meta-analyses published from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2022. Articles that analyzed the efficacy of DOAC in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence, with or without comparison with antivitamin K (VKA) drugs, were selected. DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban and apixaban, were significantly less effective than VKAs in preventing recurrence of thrombosis in patients with APS and prior arterial thrombosis or the concomitant presence of two or three different antiphospholipid antibodies. The proportion of patients with severe bleeding as side effect are similar in those treated with DOAC and with VKA. The results argue against the use of DOAC in the treatment of patients with thrombotic APS.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndromes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through April 9, 2022. The 2 main efficacy outcomes were a composite of arterial thrombotic events and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). The main safety outcome was major bleeding. Random effects models with inverse variance were used.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 253 studies. Four open-label randomized controlled trials involving 472 patients were included (mean control-arm time-in-therapeutic-range 60%). All had proper random sequence generation and adequate allocation concealment. Overall, the use of DOACs compared with VKAs was associated with increased odds of subsequent arterial thrombotic events (OR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.87-15.75; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%), especially stroke, and the composite of arterial thrombotic events or VTE (OR: 4.46; 95% CI: 1.12-17.84; P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). The odds of subsequent VTE (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.31-4.55; P = 0.79, I2 = 0%), or major bleeding (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.42-2.47; P = 0.97; I2 = 0%) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Most findings were consistent within subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome randomized to DOACs compared with VKAs appear to have increased risk for arterial thrombosis. No significant differences were observed between patients randomized to DOACs vs VKAs in the risk of subsequent VTE or major bleeding.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus Vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thromboprophylaxis is the cornerstone strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Data comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in APS patients remain contentious. We aim to review and analyse literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs in treating patients with APS. A literature search was performed from inception to 31 December 2021. Subgroups were analysed based on the risk stratification of APS profiles and different DOAC types. A total of nine studies with 1131 patients were included in the meta-analysis. High-risk APS patients (triple positive APS) who used DOACs displayed an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis [risk ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-8.93; I2  = 29%, P  = 0.005] compared with those taking VKAs. Similar risk of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding was noted in low-risk APS patients (single or double antibody-positive) upon administering DOACs or VKAs. The utilization of Rivaroxaban was associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboses (RR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.56-4.42; I2  = 0, P  = 0.0003), particularly recurrent arterial thromboses (RR = 4.52; 95% CI: 1.99-10.29; I2  = 0, P  = 0.18) in overall APS patients. Comparisons of the rate of recurrent thrombosis events and major bleeding events when using dabigatran or apixaban versus VKAs yielded no statistical differences. In the absence of contraindications, this meta-analysis suggests that VKAs remain the first-choice treatment for high-risk APS patients, with DOACs a more appropriate option for low-risk APS patients. Different DOACs may exhibit different levels of efficacy and safety for thromboprophylaxis in APS patients and require further exploration.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Due to a high risk of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), long-term anticoagulation is recommended. For decades, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the gold standard for thromboprophylaxis in these patients. Due to the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in various thromboembolic conditions and their potential advantages compared to VKAs, several studies have been conducted to evaluate their safety and efficacy in APS. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing DOACs to VKAs in patients with APS. Relative risk (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for recurrent thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality. A total of 1437 patients pooled from 12 studies were analyzed. The risk of recurrent thrombosis, especially arterial thrombosis, doubled with DOACs compared to VKAs (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.44-4.71; p=0.001). The risk further increased in patients with a triple-positive antiphospholipid antibody profile (RR 4.50, 95% CI 1.91-10.63; p=0.0006) and with the use of rivaroxaban (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.45; p=0.02). The risk of major bleeding and mortality were not significantly different between the two arms. A trend favoring DOACs compared to VKAs was observed for all bleeding events.  This meta-analysis comes in agreement with previous studies and supports the use of VKAs in APS. Our study revealed that VKAs remain the gold standard for the management of APS, especially triple-positive APS. DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, are not as effective in preventing recurrent thromboembolism in high-risk APS patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of DOACs apart from rivaroxaban with a focus on their efficacy in the management of isolated or double-positive APS.

Thromboembolic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS): Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulants-Results of the APSantiCO Registry

Background: The particular challenge in dealing with patients with thromboembolic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is to establish an adequate therapy regime, as patients suffer from an increased risk of relapse despite antithrombotic treatment (ATT). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the standard medication of choice. The current data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in APS patients remain limited. Methods: The results of the retrospective APSantiCO registry are presented. In 80 patients with APS, the efficacy and safety of different ATT regimens were analyzed. Results: At the time of inclusion, 43.8% of patients were treated with VKA and 36.3% with DOAC. Medication regimes changed several times and 279 treatment phases were further analyzed with a total treatment length of 7529 months. The incidence of recurrent arterial thrombosis was significantly larger in the DOAC group compared with the VKA group (p < 0.001), while the incidence of recurrent venous thrombosis was comparable between both groups, as was the incidence of bleedings. Heavy menstrual bleeding was the most frequently observed bleeding complication. Conclusions: The data suggest that DOAC may be an alternative to VKA for APS patients with venous thromboembolism, while VKA should be used in APS-related arterial thrombosis.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with single antibody-positive anti-phospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) remains unclear. Warfarin has been shown to be superior to DOACs among high-risk APLS patients (particularly those with triple-positive APLS). However, it remains unknown whether DOACs may be appropriate for lower-risk patients such as those with single-positive APLS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the risk of recurrent thrombosis among single-positive APLS patients treated with DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban), and those treated with warfarin.

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-three single-positive APLS patients, newly started on anticoagulation following a first thrombotic event, were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (IQR 29-73 months). Ninety-one patients (64%) received warfarin and 52 patients (36%) received a DOAC. Six patients (6.6%) who received warfarin experienced a recurrent thrombotic event compared with 3 of 52 (5.8%) patients who received a DOAC (p = .845). There was no difference in event-free survival between groups (HR DOAC:Warfarin = 0.952, 95% CI 0.232 - 3.908). Major bleeding was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that DOACs may be a safe and effective option for patients with single-positive APLS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a remaining challenge

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which affects a wide range of organs with variable clinical features. Involvement of the nervous system is a challenging and multifaceted manifestation of the disease, presenting with a broad range of symptoms. Neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE) encompasses seven syndromes of the peripheral and 12 of the central nervous system, associated with a high disease burden. Despite advances in the management of SLE, NP manifestations still pose a challenge to clinicians. First, diagnosis and attribution to SLE is difficult due to the lack of specific biomarkers or imaging modalities. Second, therapeutic options are limited, and evidence is mainly based on case reports and expert consensus, as clinical trials are sparse. Moreover, no validated outcome measure on disease activity exists. Current recommendations for treatment include supportive as well as immunosuppressive medication, depending on the type and severity of manifestations. As NPSLE manifestations are increasingly recognized, a broader spectrum of therapeutic options can be expected.

Managing Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Current and Future Prospects

Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare acquired multisystem autoimmune thromboinflammatory condition characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic clinical manifestations. APS in children and adolescents typically presents with large-vessel thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, and, rarely, obstetric morbidity. Non-thrombotic clinical manifestations are frequently seen in pediatric APS and may be present even before the vascular thrombotic events occur. We review insights into the pathogenesis of APS and discuss potential targets for therapy. The identification of multiple immunologic abnormalities in patients with APS reveals molecular targets for current or future treatment. Management strategies, especially for APS in adolescents, require screening for additional prothrombotic risk factors and consideration of counseling regarding contraceptive strategies, lifestyle recommendations, treatment adherence, and mental health issues associated with this autoimmune thrombophilia. The main goal of therapy in pediatric APS is the prevention of thrombosis. The management of acute thrombosis events in children and adolescents is the same as for primary APS, which involves isolated occurrences, and secondary APS, which is seen in association with another autoimmune disease, e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus. A pediatric hematologist should be consulted so other differential thrombophilic conditions can be eliminated. Therapy includes unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists. Treatment of catastrophic APS involves triple therapy (anticoagulation, intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, and plasma exchange) and may include intravenous immunoglobulin for children and adolescents with this condition. New drugs such as eculizumab and sirolimus seem to be promising drugs for APS.

Evaluation of Apixaban in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Several guidelines endorsed the indefinite use warfarin or heparin-containing products for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and secondary prevention and discouraged the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, adequate anticoagulation despite warfarin therapy remains a challenge in APS patients. Using DOACs in APS patients is seen in clinical practice, despite the lack of evidence to support their use in this population. In this case series, we aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apixaban use in nine patients with primary or secondary APS at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). All patients presented with APS and received apixaban with or without concomitant antiplatelet. Three patients had double positivity, and two patients had triple positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Some patients tolerated apixaban during the follow-up period, but recurrent VTE and stroke were reported in some of them. Bleeding complications were evident in some cases as well. In conclusion, warfarin remains the best choice to prevent VTE recurrence in patients with APS. On the other side, apixaban use in patients with APS may have some safety and effectiveness concerns evidenced by VTE recurrence and bleeding complications. The safety and effectiveness of utilizing apixaban in APS patients need to be assessed in well-controlled randomized trials.

Venous Thromboembolism for the Practicing Cardiologist

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is encountered commonly. Acute PE may present as a high-risk cardiovascular emergency, and acute DVT can cause acute and chronic vascular complications. The goal of this review is to ensure that cardiologists are comfortable managing VTE-including risk stratification, anticoagulation therapy, and familiarity with primary reperfusion therapy. Clinical assessment and determination of degree of right ventricular dysfunction are critical in initial risk stratification of PE and determination of parenteral versus oral anticoagulation therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants have emerged as preferred first-line oral anticoagulation strategy in VTE scenarios.

National guidelines on the management of venous thromboembolism: Joint guideline of the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society

These evidence-based guidelines from the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society intend to support clinicians in best decisions regarding the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Editor was selected by the three national societies and was tasked with the recruitment of the recognized panel. All financial support was solely derived from the sponsoring societies without the direct involvement of industry or other external stakeholders. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians in terms of VTE. The panel agreed on 42 recommendations under 15 headings for the diagnosis, initial management, secondary prevention of VTE, and treatment of recurrent VTE events. Important recommendations included the use of ultrasonography, preference for home treatment over hospital treatment for uncomplicated VTE, preference for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists for primary treatment of cancer and non-cancer-related VTE, extended or indefinite anticoagulation with DOACs in selected high-risk patients. Early catheter-directed thrombectomy was recommended in only young symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of fresh iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite vitamin K antagonists (VKA) being the gold standard in the prevention of thromboembolic events in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants/direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used off-label.

Objective

We aimed to perform a systematic review comparing DOACs to VKA regarding prevention of thromboembolic events, occurrence of bleeding events and mortality in patients with APS.

Methods

An electronic database search was performed through MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science. After data extraction, we pooled the results using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I². The outcomes considered were all thromboembolic events as primary, and major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality as secondary. Evidence confidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

Results

We included 7 studies and a total of 835 patients for analyses. Thromboembolic events were significantly increased in DOACs arm, compared with VKA—RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.62, I²—24%, n=719, 6 studies. In studies using exclusively rivaroxaban, which was the most representative drug in all included studies, the thromboembolic risk was increased threefold (RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.53 to 7.37). The risks of major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality were not significantly different from control arm. The grade of certainty of our results is very low.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests DOACs use, particularly rivaroxaban, among patients with APS, is less effective than VKA since it is associated with 69% increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Trial registration number

CRD42020216178.

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the International Guidelines

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) requires long-term anticoagulation to prevent recurrent thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used in APS patients, but contradictory guidelines recommendations on their use do exist. We performed a systematic review of literature including studies investigating the role of DOACs in APS patients. At this aim, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 14 studies which investigated the use of DOACs in patients with APS, of which 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 post-hoc analysis of 3 RCTs, 7 case series and 3 cohort studies (2 prospective and 1 retrospective). Among DOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used (n = 531), followed by dabigatran (n = 90) and apixaban (n = 46). Regarding guidelines indications, the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend against the use of DOACs in all APS patients. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), British Society for Haematology (BSH), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance provided more detailed indications stating that warfarin should be the first-choice treatment but DOACs may be considered in patients (1) already on a stable anticoagulation with a DOAC, (2) with low-quality anticoagulation by warfarin, (3) unwilling/unable to undergo INR monitoring, (4) with contraindications or serious adverse events under warfarin. Patients with arterial APS or triple positivity should be treated with warfarin while venous APS with single or double positivity may be candidate to DOACs, but high-quality studies are needed.

Arterial Thrombosis in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review and Meta-Analysis

There is a scarcity of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antithrombotic regimens for secondary prevention of arterial thrombosis (AT) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We reviewed different antithrombotic regimens used for this purpose. We searched for studies on management of AT in APS on PubMed and Web of Science. Eleven studies (5 RCTs, 3 prospective, and 3 retrospective cohort studies) comparing different regimens and reporting outcomes specifically for patients with index AT events were identified. Treatments were vitamin K antagonists (VKA; 9 studies), non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC; 3 studies), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT; 7 studies), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; 2 studies), and VKA combined with SAPT (4 studies). We performed a meta-analysis for the outcomes: recurrent AT, any (arterial or venous) recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Recurrent AT was reduced with VKA plus SAPT versus VKA (risk ratio [RR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.85) and with DAPT versus SAPT (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.99). Any recurrent thromboembolism was reduced with VKA plus SAPT versus VKA alone (RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.69) and versus SAPT alone (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.96). There were no significant differences between other treatments for thromboembolism and for none of the comparisons regarding major bleeding. In a sensitivity analysis, excluding low-quality studies, VKA was more effective than NOAC to prevent recurrent AT (RR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07-0.93). Combined antithrombotic therapy might be more effective than single agents as secondary prophylaxis in APS with AT, and does not seem to compromise with safety, but the quality of evidence is generally low. NOACs should be avoided for patients with APS and AT.

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS): Two-year outcomes after the study closure

BACKGROUND

Trial of Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome was a prospective randomized, open-label, noninferiority study conducted in 14 centers in Italy. Rivaroxaban was compared with warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in high-risk, triple-positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to report the events during the 2-year follow-up after the study closure.

METHODS

On January 28, 2018, the trial was prematurely stopped by adjudication and safety committee for an excess of events in the rivaroxaban group. Randomized patients were advised on trial results and those randomized to rivaroxaban were solicited to switch to warfarin. All 14 participating centers were asked and accepted to follow their patients for clinical events. This report describes the rate of events that occurred between January 28, 2018, and January 28, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 120 randomized patients, 115 were available for follow-up. Outcome events were two in six (33.3%) patients who remained on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and six in 109 (5.7%) patients on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-34.5, P = .018). The two patients on DOACs (one taking dabigatran and one taking rivaroxaban) suffered from thromboembolic events, whereas of the six patients with composite outcomes on warfarin, three had thromboembolic events (HR for thrombosis 13.3; 95% CI 2.2-79.9, P = .005).

CONCLUSION

These data further support the use of warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Treatment of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome in adults and children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), more common than once believed, is an autoimmune disease best known for its high risk of incident and recurrent thrombotic events. The approach to treatment potentially differs from treatment of thrombosis in the general population, and this article endeavors to review the latest updates on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

The epidemiology of APS is being increasingly elucidated by large population-based studies, with APS perhaps affecting as many as 1 in 2000 individuals. Vitamin K antagonists, aspirin, and heparinoids continue to have obvious roles in the management of patients with APS. There has recently been intensive study of direct oral anticoagulants in APS, with the most recent randomized studies raising concerns about their inferiority to vitamin K antagonists, at least in some subgroups. Other approaches to treating APS beyond anticoagulants and antiaggregants are also receiving increased attention in mechanistic and preclinical studies with an eye toward future roles in patients with refractory and/or microvascular disease. Pediatric APS is identified as an area in desperate need of additional prospective research.

SUMMARY

Progress continues to be made in pursuit of improving the lives of individuals afflicted with APS. The most important future directions would seem to involve leveraging modern molecular technologies in order to improve subphenotyping of antiphospholipid antibody-positive individuals. This will help personalize risk profiles and ideally define the optimal approach to therapy based on future risk, rather than past morbid events.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with severe inherited thrombophilia: a single-center cohort study

We investigated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with severe inherited thrombophilia. In this single-center cohort study, we enrolled 56 consecutive VTE patients with severe inherited thrombophilia, defined as the presence of antithrombin (n = 18), protein C (n = 12) and protein S (n = 12) deficiencies, homozygous Factor V Leiden (n = 3) and prothrombin G20210AA (n = 4) mutations, or combined defects (n = 7). During a median follow-up of 44.5 (IQR 30-52.5) months, rivaroxaban was used in 30 (53.6%), apixabanin 14 (25%), and dabigatran in 12 (21.4%) subjects. Recurrent nonfatal VTE was observed in 5 (8.9%) patients (2.4 per 100 patient-years), treated with rivaroxaban (n = 4) and apixaban (n = 1). Major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) occurred in 2 (3.5%) and 4 (7%) subjects, respectively (0.96 per 100 patient-years and 1.92 per 100 patient-years, respectively), including 4 patients on rivaroxaban. The event-free survival analysis showed that the use of rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding, compared with apixaban or dabigatran (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.26-3.92, p = 0.039). In conclusion, the results of our cohort study indicate that full-dose dabigatran or apixaban are effective and safe in patients with severe inherited thrombophilia.

16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on Antiphospholipid Syndrome Treatment Trends

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an acquired autoimmune thrombophilia, is characterised by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. The 16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force on APS Treatment Trends reviewed the current status with regard to existing and novel treatment trends for APS, which is the focus of this Task Force report. The report addresses current treatments and developments since the last report, on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with APS, antiplatelet agents, adjunctive therapies (hydroxychloroquine, statins and vitamin D), targeted treatment including rituximab, belimumab, and anti-TNF agents, complement inhibition and drugs based on peptides of beta-2-glycoprotein I. In addition, the report summarises potential new players, including coenzyme Q10, adenosine receptor agonists and adenosine potentiation. In each case, the report provides recommendations for clinicians, based on the current state of the art, and suggests a clinical research agenda. The initiation and development of appropriate clinical studies requires a focus on devising suitable outcome measures, including a disease activity index, an optimal damage index, and a specific quality of life index.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Clarity and guidance is required with regard to the use of direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, within the confines of the recent European Medicines Agency recommendations, discrepant recommendations in other international guidelines and the limited evidence base. To address this, the Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) chair and co-chairs together with SSC Control of Anticoagulation members propose guidance for healthcare professionals to help them manage APS patients. Uncertainty in this field will be addressed. This guidance will also serve as a call and focus for research.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology position statement on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

BACKGROUND

The term Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) refers to a group of drugs that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. Even though their use for treating different thrombotic or prothrombotic conditions is increasing recently, there is no compelling evidence indicating that those medications are safe in all antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients.

METHODOLOGY

To address this issue, specialists from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding DOACs use in APS to answer the three following questions: (1) potential mechanisms of action of these drugs that could be relevant to APS pathogenesis, (2) DOACs interference on lupus anticoagulant testing, and (3) the efficacy of DOACs in APS.

POSITION STATEMENT

After critically reviewing the relevant evidence, the authors formulated 8 Position Statements about DOACs use in APS.

CONCLUSION

DOACs should not be routinely used in APS patients, especially in those with a high-risk profile (triple positivity to aPL, arterial thrombosis, and recurrent thrombotic events). In addition, DOACs interferes with LA testing, leading to false-positive results in patients investigating APS.