End of life care of hospitalized patients with Parkinson disease: a retrospective analysis and brief review

Background

Towards the end of life (EOL), persons with parkinsonism (PwP) have complex needs and can present with unique palliative care (PC) challenges. There are no widely accepted guidelines to aid neurologists, hospitalists, or PC clinicians in managing the symptoms of PwP at EOL. We examined a population of PwP at EOL, aiming to describe trends of in-hospital management and utilization of PC services.

Methods

All PwP admitted to two hospitals during 2018 (N = 727) were examined retrospectively, assessing those who died in hospital or were discharged with hospice (EOL group, N = 35) and comparing them to the main cohort. Their demographics, clinical data, engagement of multidisciplinary and palliative services, code status changes, invasive care, frequency of admissions, and medication administration were assessed.

Results

Among the EOL group, 8 expired in hospital, and 27 were discharged to hospice. Forty-six percent of EOL patients received a PC consultation during their admission. The median interval from admission to death was 37 days. Seventy-seven percent had a full code status on admission. Compared to hospice patients, those who expired in hospital had higher rates of invasive procedures and intensive care unit transfers (41% vs. 75%, in both variables), and lower rates of PC involvement (52% vs. 25%). The transition of code status change for the EOL group from Full code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) occurred at a median 4-5 days from admission. For patients that passed in the hospital, the median days from transition of code status to death was 0(IQR 0-1). Levodopa dose deviations were frequent in both EOL and non-EOL group, but contraindicated medications were infrequently administered (11% in EOL group vs. 9% in non-EOL group).

Conclusion

Our data suggest a low utilization of PC services and delayed discussions of goals of care. More work is needed to raise awareness of inpatient teams managing PwP regarding the unique but common challenges facing PwP with advanced disease. A brief narrative review summarizing the suggested management of symptoms common to hospitalized PwP near EOL is provided.

Referral criteria to palliative care for patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to identify the referral criteria for palliative care in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search for publications on referral criteria for palliative care in patients with Parkinson's disease in six electronic databases. The articles were thoroughly reviewed by two independent reviewers for inclusion using a predefined data extraction list. The referral criteria were thematically classified using a coding methodology.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 36 publications. We identified 14 referral criteria themes. The most common referral indicators were functional decline (n = 11 [31%]), needs assessment tools (n = 11 [31%]), physical or emotional symptoms (n = 10[28%]), need for palliative care (n = 10 [28%]), decision support (n = 9 [25%]), advanced Parkinson's disease (n = 7[19%]), and diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (n = 7 [19%]). However, there was a lack of consensus on symptom assessment tools. In addition, there were no agreed cut-offs or defined time for palliative care referral for patients with Parkinson's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The 14 themes identified in this systematic review were categorized into disease- and needs-based criteria. These themes show the wide range of referral timing and procedures. Further studies should be conducted to reveal standardized referral criteria.

Palliative care in Parkinson disease and related disorders

Although neuropalliative care is a relatively new field, there is increasing evidence for its use among the degenerative parkinsonian syndromes, including idiopathic Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, dementia with Lewy bodies, and corticobasal syndrome. This chapter outlines the current state of evidence for palliative care among individuals with the degenerative parkinsonian syndromes with discussion surrounding: (1) disease burden and needs across the conditions; (2) utility, timing, and methods for advance care planning; (3) novel care models for the provision of palliative care; and 4) end-of-life care issues. We also discuss currently unmet needs and unanswered questions in the field, proposing priorities for research and the assessment of implemented care models.

Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives

To systematically review the literature for the most suitable trigger criteria for referral to specialist palliative care services in life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical conditions.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-December 2020). To be included, studies must have trigger/referral criteria clearly outlined, a ≥75% nononcology neurosciences population, and consensus or guidelines documents regarding palliative neurosciences or trigger/referral criteria. We excluded studies that had an oncologic or non-neurosciences population as the main focus of study, trigger and referral criteria not clearly outlined, and no primary or duplicative data. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202013579), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guidelines Process Manual was used to assess for risk of bias.

Results

Our search identified 1,748 publications, of which 22 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were considered in 2 main groups: (A) studies designed specifically to identify trigger criteria for referral to specialized neuropalliative care services (n = 9) and (B) studies that retrospectively reported the reason for referral to specialized palliative care or reflected a consensus statement among people with advanced neurologic illness (n = 13). Overall, the results suggest that several published referral triggers for specialized neuropalliative care are based on expert consensus. However, there is a growing body of literature providing evidence-based condition-specific triggers for multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia.

Discussion

There is a growing body of research that outlines evidence-based referral triggers for neuropalliative care. The ambiguity of nomenclature surrounding referral triggers in the current literature and field of neuropalliative care was a limitation to this study. We suggest that condition-specific triggers are likely to be the most effective for identifying the appropriate patients and timing for referral to specialist palliative care. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020135791, crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

When to initiate palliative care in neurology

Life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic conditions often progress slowly. Patients live with a substantial symptom burden over a long period of time, and there is often a high degree of functional and cognitive impairment. Because of this, the most appropriate time to initiate neuropalliative care is often difficult to identify. Further challenges to the incorporation of neuropalliative care include communication barriers, such as profound dysarthria or language impairments, and loss of cognitive function and decision-making capacity that prevent shared decision making and threaten patient autonomy. As a result, earlier initiation of at least some components of palliative care is paramount to ensuring patient-centered care while the patient is still able to communicate effectively and participate as fully as possible in their medical care. For these reasons, neuropalliative care is also distinct from palliative care in oncology, and there is a growing evidence base to guide timely initiation and integration of neuropalliative care. In this chapter, we will focus on when to initiate palliative care in patients with life-limiting, life-threatening, and advanced neurologic conditions. We will address three main questions, which patients with neurologic conditions will benefit from initiation of palliative care, what aspects of neurologic illness are most amenable to neuropalliative care, and when to initiate neuropalliative care?

End-of-life and hospice care for neurologic illness

Systems for end of life care around the world vary in availability, structure, and funding. When available, most end of life care is in the hospice model with an interdisciplinary team approach to care of people who are expected to die within months and whose primary goal is to maximize quality of life. Symptom management near the end of life is guided by prognosis and individual priorities. People dying with neurologic disease are likely to have impaired communication or mobility that adds to the complexity of prognostication and symptom management. Neurologic specialists have important roles to play in end of life care due to their unique understanding of disease prognosis as well as end of life symptom burden and management. Neurologic specialists need to become strong advocates for the importance of end of life care by being actively involved in the hospice movement and by addressing current disparities in access to care.

Integration of palliative care in Parkinson's disease management

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that negatively impacts the lives of affected people. The therapeutic benefits of treatment only decrease going forward from the time of diagnosis. Motor and non-motor symptoms alike create a heavy burden for patients and those involved in their care. Palliative care is utilized for patients with serious illnesses and when integrated into patients with Parkinson's disease, improves quality of life by addressing symptoms of discomfort, which ultimately reduces symptom burden to patients and alleviates caregiver stress.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to assess the efficacy of palliative care in the management of Parkinson's disease by exploring the benefits of palliative care integration throughout multiple relevant themes to demonstrate the optimal care delivery.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches on the role of palliative care in Parkinson's disease patients within MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Embase, and BioMed Central, considering publications between March 2010 - February 2020 were performed. A grey literature search was also performed for additional information.

RESULTS

Analysis of various existing literature has demonstrated promise in timely palliative care integration for patients with Parkinson's disease, which has shown improvement in the quality of life of Parkinson's disease patients. It also strives to alleviate caregivers' stress and improve their quality of life, although insufficient research exists to support this. Palliative care in Parkinson's disease is a growing area of interest, evidently demonstrating the potential to expand among the current approaches.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the connections between the themes surrounding palliative care is crucial for successful integration in Parkinson's disease management. It is determined that integration of palliative care in patients with Parkinson's disease help to not only improve patients' experiences but also their caregiver's experiences throughout the disease trajectory. Further research should be conducted to address how palliative care will focus on alleviating caregiver burden and establish specific prognostication tools for Parkinson's disease patients.

Managing Advanced Parkinson Disease

Advanced Parkinson disease (PD) is associated with treatment-related motor fluctuations and reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Progression of non-motor symptoms and medication-induced adverse effects complicate focused approach to motor symptom management, frequently accelerating reduced quality of life. It is thus critical for clinicians to consider disease progression versus therapeutic contributions when balancing management decisions. Such an approach requires careful recognition of inflection points resulting from therapeutic decisions and should prompt consideration of reduced pharmacologic burden and increased reliance on non-pharmacologic strategies in advanced disease. The successful approach to advanced PD requires a multidisciplinary effort focused on improving the patient's and family's quality of life, sometimes requiring sacrifice of motor symptom benefit. Here, we emphasize management strategies in advanced PD, focusing on the need to balance the therapeutic approach across advancing motor symptoms, progressive non-motor features, and potential pharmacologic adverse effects.

Prognostic predictors relevant to end-of-life palliative care in Parkinson's disease and related disorders: a systematic review

Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PDRD) are the second most common neurodegenerative disease and a leading cause of death. However, patients with PDRD receive less end-of-life palliative care (hospice) than other illnesses, including other neurologic illnesses. Identification of predictors of PDRD mortality may aid in increasing appropriate and timely referrals. To systematically review the literature for causes of death and predictors of mortality in PDRD to provide guidance regarding hospice/end-of-life palliative care referrals. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases (1970-2020) of original quantitative research using patient-level, provider-level or caregiver-level data from medical records, administrative data or survey responses associated with mortality, prognosis or cause of death in PDRD. Findings were reviewed by an International Working Group on PD and Palliative Care supported by the Parkinson's Foundation. Of 1183 research articles, 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. We found four main domains of factors associated with mortality in PDRD: (1) demographic and clinical markers (age, sex, body mass index and comorbid illnesses), (2) motor dysfunction and global disability, (3) falls and infections and (4) non-motor symptoms. We provide suggestions for consideration of timing of hospice/end-of-life palliative care referrals. Several clinical features of advancing disease may be useful in triggering end-of-life palliative/hospice referral. Prognostic studies focused on identifying when people with PDRD are nearing their final months of life are limited. There is further need for research in this area as well as policies that support need-based palliative care for the duration of PDRD.

Palliative Care in Movement Disorders: an Evolving Field

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current state of evidence for palliative care (PC) in movement disorders, describes the application of PC to clinical practice, and suggests future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

PC needs are common in persons living with movement disorders and their families from the time of diagnosis through end-of-life and contribute to quality of life. Early advance care planning is preferred by patients, impacts outcomes and is promoted by PC frameworks. Systematic assessment of non-motor symptoms, psychosocial needs and spiritual/existential distress may address gaps in current models of care. Several complementary and emerging models of PC may be utilized to meet the needs of this population. A PC approach may identify and improve important patient and caregiver-centered outcomes. As a relatively new application of PC, there is a need for research to adapt, develop and implement approaches to meet the unique needs of this population.

Palliative Care for Parkinson Disease

Palliative care (PC) is an approach to the care of persons affected by serious illness that focuses on reducing suffering by addressing medical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs. Persons living with Parkinson disease have PC needs that begin at the time of diagnosis and continue throughout the course of the illness including nonmotor symptom burden, caregiver distress, grief, and increased mortality. Primary PC refers to essential PC skills that may be practiced by nonpalliative medicine specialists to improve outcomes for their patients.

Dementia and Parkinson's Disease: Similar and Divergent Challenges in Providing Palliative Care

Dementia and Parkinson's disease are incurable neurological conditions. Patients often experience specific, complex, and varying needs along their disease trajectory. Current management typically employs a multidisciplinary team approach. Recognition is growing that this team approach should also address palliative care issues to optimize quality of life for patient and family caregivers, but it remains unclear how palliative care is best delivered. To inspire future service development and research, we compare the trajectories and conceptualization of palliative care between dementia and Parkinson's disease. Both Parkinson's disease and dementia are characterized by a protracted course, with progressive but fairly insidious development of disability. However, patients with Parkinson's disease may experience relatively stable periods initially but with time, a wide range of debilitating symptoms develops, many of which do not respond well to treatment. Eventually, dementia develops in most Parkinson patients, while motor disability develops in many dementia patients. In both diseases, symptoms such as pain, apathy, sleeping problems, falls, and a high caregiver burden are prevalent. Advance care planning has benefits in terms of being prepared before the disease progresses into a stage with communication problems or severe cognitive impairment. However, for both conditions, the protracted disease trajectories complicate conceptualization of palliative care through different stages of the disease, with pertinent questions such as when to offer what interventions pro-actively. Given the similarities and differences, we should develop palliative approaches that are partially generic and partially disease-specific. These should be integrated seamlessly with disease-specific care. Substantial research is already being performed on dementia palliative care. This may also inform the further development of palliative care for Parkinson's disease, including an evaluation of palliative interventions and services.

Palliative medicine and end-of-life care

Palliative care is an approach to the care of patients, affected by serious illness, and their families that aims to reduce suffering through the management of medical symptoms, psychosocial issues, spiritual well-being, and setting goals of care. Patients and families affected by a neurodegenerative illness have significant palliative care needs beginning at the time of diagnosis and extending through end-of-life care and bereavement. We advocate an approach to addressing these needs where the patient's primary care provider or neurologist plays a central role. Key skills in providing effective palliative care to this population include providing the diagnosis with compassion, setting goals of care, anticipating safety concerns, caregiver assessment, advance care planning, addressing psychosocial concerns, and timely referral to a hospice. Managing distressing medical and psychiatric symptoms is critical to improving quality of life throughout the disease course as well as at end-of-life. Many symptoms are common across illnesses; however, there are issues that are specific to the most common classes of neurodegenerative illness, namely dementia, parkinsonism, and motor neuron disease. Incorporating a palliative approach to care, although challenging in many ways, empowers physicians to provide greater support and guidance to patients and families in making the difficult journey through a neurodegenerative illness.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders

Parkinson's disease (PD) affects 1%-2% of individuals older than 60 years and is the 14th leading cause of death in the United States. People with PD, across all stages of the disease, suffer from a significant symptom burden that includes many nonmotor symptoms (such as depression, fatigue, pain, and dementia), and most will ultimately die from complications of this degenerative and incurable illness. Even at diagnosis, a palliative care (PC) approach can help the patient adjust to his or her diagnosis and maintain an optimal quality of life. We brought together a team of PD and PC experts to assemble practical tips for the care of people with PD. The "Top 10" format emphasizes the most relevant issues to enable PC clinicians to provide optimal care for those suffering with this complex neurodegenerative disease.

Parkinson Disease

Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects one million people in the United States. This article reviews the etiology and pathophysiology of PD, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of this common disease. Implications for home care clinicians are included.

Severely Affected by Parkinson Disease: The Patient's View and Implications for Palliative Care

INTRODUCTION

People severely affected by Parkinson disease (PD)/atypical parkinsonism (AP) comprise a heterogeneous group with distinct needs, which so far remain largely unexamined. The aim of our study was to analyze reasons for feeling severely affected and document unmet needs in a patient subgroup severely affected by PD/AP using solely a subjective inclusion criterion.

METHODS

Patients feeling severely affected by PD/AP were recruited via a magazine published by the German Parkinson Association. A questionnaire was sent out nationwide. Besides analyzing the closed-ended questions, a subsample of 40% was analyzed regarding the open-ended questions using content analysis. Correlations between subjectively felt severe affectedness and objective criteria were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fourteen questionnaires were analyzed. Sample characteristics were: mean age 70 years; 60.3% male; time since diagnosis up to 37 years; and Hoehn and Yahr score (if known) 3 (44.6%), followed by 4 (23.9%). Significant associations were observed between subjectively felt severe affectedness and Hoehn and Yahr ( P ≤ .05), poorer health ( P ≤ .01), higher nursing care level ( P ≤ 0.01), and having no children ( P ≤ .05). Most common reasons for feeling severely affected were mobility impairment (34.9%), coordination problems (17.0%), speech problems (12.2%), and limited day-to-day activities (7.8%). Most often expressed unmet needs were support in everyday life (28.1%), medical treatment (15.2%), help with financial services (11.6%), and social integration (9.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

To meet the complex needs, an integrated multidisciplinary and multiprofessional approach is indicated befitting palliative care principles. Herein, home-based services seem of special importance for patients in advanced disease stages.

The Impact of Hospice Patient Disease Type and Length of Stay on Caregiver Utilization of Grief Counseling: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

This investigation explored the relationship between hospice patient disease type, length of stay (LOS) in hospice, and caregiver utilization of grief counseling in bereavement. A 10-year retrospective study was conducted utilizing data from caregivers associated with hospice patients who died between 2004 and 2014. A threshold of inclusion for disease type (≥1.00% of hospice admissions) resulted in a sample size of 3704 patients, comprising 19 different disease types and 348 associated caregivers who received counseling. Replicating a previous study, brain cancer, lung cancer, and renal failure were among the top 4 disease types associated with higher-than-average utilization of bereavement services among caregivers, regardless of the patient’s LOS. This finding may be related to factors such as the duration of the disease, the deterioration of the patient, the absence of symptom control, and secondary losses. LOS as a predictor of whether counseling will be utilized by hospice caregivers was unsupported by this study, as the percentage of caregivers receiving counseling closely paralleled the patient’s LOS across 4 cohorts (1-30 days, 31-60 days, 61-90 days, and 91+ days). However, among the caregivers who utilized counseling, the LOS was a statistically significant predictor of the number of counseling sessions utilized. For caregivers who utilized only 1 counseling session, the associated patient median LOS was 21.5 days. For caregivers who utilized 5 or more counseling sessions, the associated patient median LOS dropped to 12 days, suggesting an inverted relationship between hospice patient LOS and the duration of counseling in bereavement.