Predictors of Placement of Inpatient Palliative Care Consult Orders Among Patients With Breast, Lung, and Colon Cancer in a Safety Net Hospital System

Naming racism as a root cause of inequities in palliative care research: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic inequities in palliative care are well-established. The way researchers design and interpret studies investigating race- and ethnicity-based disparities has future implications on the interventions aimed to reduce these inequities. If racism is not discussed when contextualizing findings, it is less likely to be addressed and inequities will persist.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the characteristics of 12 years of academic literature that investigates race- or ethnicity-based disparities in palliative care access, outcomes and experiences, and determine the extent to which racism is discussed when interpreting findings.

METHODS

Following Arksey & O'Malley's methodology for scoping reviews, we searched bibliographic databases for primary, peer reviewed studies globally, in all languages, that collected race or ethnicity variables in a palliative care context (January 1, 2011 to October 17, 2023). We recorded study characteristics and categorized citations based on their research focus-whether race or ethnicity were examined as a major focus (analyzed as a primary independent variable or population of interest) or minor focus (analyzed as a secondary variable) of the research purpose, and the interpretation of findings-whether authors directly or indirectly discussed racism when contextualizing the study results.

RESULTS

We identified 3000 citations and included 181 in our review. Of these, most were from the United States (88.95%) and examined race or ethnicity as a major focus (71.27%). When interpreting findings, authors directly named racism in 7.18% of publications. They were more likely to use words closely associated with racism (20.44%) or describe systemic or individual factors (41.44%). Racism was directly named in 33.33% of articles published since 2021 versus 3.92% in the 10 years prior, suggesting it is becoming more common.

CONCLUSION

While the focus on race and ethnicity in palliative care research is increasing, there is room for improvement when acknowledging systemic factors - including racism - during data analysis. Researchers must be purposeful when investigating race and ethnicity, and identify how racism shapes palliative care access, outcomes and experiences of racially and ethnically minoritized patients.

Impact of Referring Team Characteristics on Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation Rate at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Background: No prior study addresses the impact of admitting team characteristics on inpatient palliative care (PC) consultation rate in cancer patients. Understanding consultation rate differences among admitting service types may reveal PC access disparities for patients who would benefit from consultation. Aim: To determine the impact of admitting service characteristics (teaching vs. nonteaching and surgical vs. medical) on inpatient PC consultation rates. Methods: A six-month cross-sectional study was performed at an academic comprehensive cancer center. Inpatient PC consultations and follow-up visits were compared to total admissions by admitting service category. Results: Five thousand six hundred ninety-seven admissions resulted in 710 new PC consultations and 2494 follow-up visits. Patients admitted to medical services had highest odds of PC consultation, while data for teaching services were mixed. There was no difference in follow-up visits. Conclusions: Significant differences between medical and surgical service PC consultation rates may indicate specialty PC access disparities solely based on their admitting service.

Disparities in Palliative and Hospice Care and Completion of Advance Care Planning and Directives Among Non-Hispanic Blacks: A Scoping Review of Recent Literature

OBJECTIVES

Published research in disparities in advance care planning, palliative, and end-of-life care is limited. However, available data points to significant barriers to palliative and end-of-life care among minority adults. The main objective of this scoping review was to summarize the current published research and literature on disparities in palliative and hospice care and completion of advance care planning and directives among non-Hispanc Blacks.

METHODS

The scoping review method was used because currently published research in disparities in palliative and hospice cares as well as advance care planning are limited. Nine electronic databases and websites were searched to identify English-language peer-reviewed publications published within last 20 years. A total of 147 studies that addressed palliative care, hospice care, and advance care planning and included non-Hispanic Blacks were incorporated in this study. The literature review include manuscripts that discuss the intersection of social determinants of health and end-of-life care for non-Hispanic Blacks. We examined the potential role and impact of several factors, including knowledge regarding palliative and hospice care; healthcare literacy; communication with providers and family; perceived or experienced discrimination with healthcare systems; mistrust in healthcare providers; health care coverage, religious-related activities and beliefs on palliative and hospice care utilization and completion of advance directives among non-Hispanic Blacks.

DISCUSSION

Cross-sectional and longitudinal national surveys, as well as local community- and clinic-based data, unequivocally point to major disparities in palliative and hospice care in the United States. Results suggest that national and community-based, multi-faceted, multi-disciplinary, theoretical-based, resourceful, culturally-sensitive interventions are urgently needed. A number of practical investigational interventions are offered. Additionally, we identify several research questions which need to be addressed in future research.

Goals-of-Care Consultations Are Associated with Lower Costs and Less Acute Care Use among Propensity-Matched Cohorts of African Americans and Whites with Serious Illness

Background: African Americans receive more aggressive end-of-life care than Whites. Little is known about how palliative care consultation to discuss goals-of-care ("PCC") is associated with acute care utilization and costs by race. Objective: To compare future acute care costs and utilization between propensity-matched cohorts of African Americans with and without PCC, and Whites with and without PCC. Design: Secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Thirty-five thousand one hundred and fifty-four African Americans and Whites age 18+ admitted for conditions other than childbirth or rehabilitation, who were not hospitalized at the end of the study, and did not die during index hospitalization (hospitalization during which the first PCC occurred). Measurements: Accumulated mean acute care costs and utilization (30-day readmissions, future hospital days, future intensive care unit [ICU] admission, future number of ICU days) after discharge from index hospitalization. Results: No significant difference between African Americans with or without PCC in mean future acute care costs ($11,651 vs. $15,050, p = 0.09), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.58), future hospital days (p = 0.34), future ICU admission (p = 0.25), or future ICU days (p = 0.30). There were significant differences between Whites with PCC and those without PCC in mean future acute care costs ($8,095 vs. $16,799, p < 0.001), 30-day readmissions (10.2% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.0001), and future days hospitalized (3.7 vs. 6.3 days, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: PCC decreases future acute care costs and utilization in Whites and, directionally but not significantly, in African Americans. Research is needed to explain why utilization and cost disparities persist among African Americans despite PCC.

Incidence, Trends, and Predictors of Palliative Care Consultation After Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States

Aim:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have become a reasonably safe procedure with acceptable morbidity and mortality rate. However, little is known regarding the incidence, trends, and predictors of palliative care (PC) consult in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients. The main purpose of this analysis was to assess the incidence, trends, and predictors of PC consultation in AVR recipients using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

Materials and Methods:

We queried the NIS database from 2005 to September 2015 to identify those who underwent TAVR or SAVR and had PC referral during the index hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was calculated to identify patient demographic, social and hospital characteristics, and procedural characteristics associated with PC consult using multivariable regression analysis. We also reported the trends of PC referral in AVR recipients.

Results:

A total of 522 765 admissions (mean age: 75.3 ± 7.8 years, 40.3% female) who had TAVR (1.7% transapical and 9.2% endovascular approach) and SAVR (89.2%) were identified. Inpatient mortality was 3.96%, and 0.5% patients of the total admissions had PC consultation. The PC referral for SAVR increased from 0.90 to 7.2 per 1000 SAVR from 2005 to 2015 ( P = .011), while it remained stable ranging from 9.30 to 13.3 PC consults per 1000 TAVR ( P = .86). Age 80 to 89 (aOR: 1.93), age ≥90 years (aOR: 2.57), female sex (aOR: 1.36), electrolyte derangement (aOR: 1.90), weight loss (aOR: 1.88), and do not resuscitate status (aOR: 44.4) were associated with PC consult. West region (aOR: 1.46) and Medicaid (aOR: 3.05) were independently associated with PC consult. Endovascular (aOR: 1.88) and transapical TAVR (aOR: 2.80) had higher PC referral rates compared with SAVR.

Conclusions:

There was an increase in trends for utilization of PC service in SAVR admissions while it remained unchanged in TAVR cohort, but the overall PC referral rate was low in AVR recipients during the index hospitalization.

Examining the Association between Healthcare Utilization and Clinical Characteristics among Cancer Patients in a Safety Net Health System

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine the association between available patient and clinical characteristics and healthcare utilization in a cohort of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients within a safety-net hospital system.

METHODS

Data for 979 breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients admitted to a large, urban hospital for the year 2010 were extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between relevant independent variables that were able to be captured from the EMR in discrete fields, emergency room (ER) utilization, and hospitalizations among members of the cohort. Spearman correlation coefficients to test the correlations between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and opioid prescriptions and healthcare utilization were also calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 979 patients, 22% were 65 years and older, 43% were non-Hispanic black, 42% had Medicare, and 56% had colorectal cancer. Patient and clinical characteristics that were associated with increased ER utilization, included Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio; AOR: 2.21, 95% confidence interval; CI: 1.52-3.21), non-Hispanic black race (AOR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.43-2.82), and referral to palliative care (AOR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.36-3.41). Referral to palliative care (AOR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.47-10.0), low albumin (AOR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.20-4.89), and presence of metastases (AOR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.29-3.06) were associated with greater odds of hospitalization. Number of opioids prescribed strongly correlated with number of hospitalizations (ρ correlation = 0.74). Only 10.6% of patients had been referred to outpatient palliative care during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patient and clinical characteristics associated with increased ER visits and hospitalizations in this cohort include race/ethnicity, palliative care referral, markers of advanced disease, and number opioids prescribed. Increasing knowledge of palliative care and access to palliative care among the underserved should be a focus of future research.