1
|
Kotake K, Matsunuma S, Kitamura N, Noritake Y, Kawakami Y. Preventive effects of first-generation antihistamine on emergence agitation or delirium: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2024:10.1007/s00228-024-03748-9. [PMID: 39264446 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The effects of first-generation antihistamines in preventing postoperative emergence agitation or delirium are unclear. Determining the postoperative effects of first-generation antihistamines may provide important insights into the management of patient safety. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of postoperative first-generation antihistamines. METHODS Patients who used first-generation antihistamines in the intensive care unit or operating room were included. Primary outcomes were assessed postoperative emergence agitation or delirium with binary and continuous variables. The secondary outcome was any adverse event. RESULTS Nine studies were included. The frequency of postoperative emergence agitation, measured using binary variables, tended to be lower in patients receiving chlorpheniramine or diphenhydramine than those receiving saline. However, evaluation using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale as a continuous variable revealed that only chlorpheniramine was effective at lowering postoperative emergence agitation. Only one study assessed delirium but found no benefit of first-generation antihistamines. Adverse events for first-generation antihistamines did not differ from that of other drugs. CONCLUSION Our results provide limited evidence that some first-generation antihistamines may prevent postoperative emergence agitation and are safe. To further verify this possibility, new RCTs with clear and universal assessment criteria for postoperative emergence agitation or delirium should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazumasa Kotake
- Department of Pharmacy, Zikei Hospital, Zikei Institute of Psychiatry, 100-2 Urayasu Honmachi, Minami-Ku, Okayama-shi, Okayama, 702-8508, Japan.
| | - Satoru Matsunuma
- Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 193-0988, Japan
| | - Naoya Kitamura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama-shi, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Yumi Noritake
- Department of Pharmacy, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama-shi, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kawakami
- Department of Pharmacy, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutaicho, Kita-ku, Okayama-shi, Okayama, 700-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng L, Zhao X, Sun Y, Cheng S, Bao L, Fang K, Yu Q, Zheng Y, Wang J, Luo M, Gunderman D, Vuckovic N, Sidhu AS, Li J, Li G, Wolfe JW, Liu Z, Adams DC. Characteristics associated with effectiveness in postoperative delirium research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-regression and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133:565-583. [PMID: 38969535 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium remains prevalent despite extensive research through randomised trials aimed at reducing its incidence. Understanding trial characteristics associated with interventions' effectiveness facilitates data interpretation. METHODS Trial characteristics were extracted from eligible trials identified through two systematic literature searches. Multivariable meta-regression was used to investigate trial characteristics associated with effectiveness estimated using odds ratios. Meta-analysis was used to investigate pooled effectiveness. RESULTS We identified 201 eligible trials. Compared with China, trials from the USA/Canada (ratio of odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.45) and Europe/Australia/New Zealand (1.67; 1.29-2.18) had an 89% and 67% higher odds ratio, respectively, suggesting reduced effectiveness. The effectiveness was enhanced when the incidence of postoperative delirium increased (0.85; 0.79-0.92, per 10% increase). Trials with concerns related to deviations from intended interventions reported increased effectiveness compared with those at low risk (0.69; 0.53-0.90). Compared with usual care, certain interventions appeared to have reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium in low-risk trials with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. However, these findings should be considered inconclusive because of challenges in grouping heterogeneous interventions, the limited number of eligible trials, the prevalence of small-scale studies, and potential publication bias. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of postoperative delirium trials varied based on the region of trial origin, the incidence of delirium, and the risk of bias. The limitations caution against drawing definitive conclusions from different bodies of evidence. These findings highlight the imperative need to improve the quality of research on a global scale. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL PROSPERO (CRD42023413984).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingzhong Meng
- Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Xu Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanhua Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Shufen Cheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lin Bao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kaiyun Fang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Qiong Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yueying Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Mengqiang Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - David Gunderman
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nikola Vuckovic
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Angad S Sidhu
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - John W Wolfe
- Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ziyue Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - David C Adams
- Department of Anesthesia, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Aceto P, Audisio R, Cherubini A, Cunningham C, Dabrowski W, Forookhi A, Gitti N, Immonen K, Kehlet H, Koch S, Kotfis K, Latronico N, MacLullich AMJ, Mevorach L, Mueller A, Neuner B, Piva S, Radtke F, Blaser AR, Renzi S, Romagnoli S, Schubert M, Slooter AJC, Tommasino C, Vasiljewa L, Weiss B, Yuerek F, Spies CD. Update of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium in adult patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:81-108. [PMID: 37599617 PMCID: PMC10763721 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Postoperative delirium (POD) remains a common, dangerous and resource-consuming adverse event but is often preventable. The whole peri-operative team can play a key role in its management. This update to the 2017 ESAIC Guideline on the prevention of POD is evidence-based and consensus-based and considers the literature between 01 April 2015, and 28 February 2022. The search terms of the broad literature search were identical to those used in the first version of the guideline published in 2017. POD was defined in accordance with the DSM-5 criteria. POD had to be measured with a validated POD screening tool, at least once per day for at least 3 days starting in the recovery room or postanaesthesia care unit on the day of surgery or, at latest, on postoperative day 1. Recent literature confirmed the pathogenic role of surgery-induced inflammation, and this concept reinforces the positive role of multicomponent strategies aimed to reduce the surgical stress response. Although some putative precipitating risk factors are not modifiable (length of surgery, surgical site), others (such as depth of anaesthesia, appropriate analgesia and haemodynamic stability) are under the control of the anaesthesiologists. Multicomponent preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative preventive measures showed potential to reduce the incidence and duration of POD, confirming the pivotal role of a comprehensive and team-based approach to improve patients' clinical and functional status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Aldecoa
- From the Department of Anaesthesia and Postoperative Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain (CA), Department of Biomedical Studies, University of the Republic of San Marino, San Marino (GB), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy (FB, AF, LM), Specialty of Anaesthetics & NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney & Department of Anaesthetics and Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RDS), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, and Campus Virchow Klinikum (CDS, SK, AM, BN, LV, BW, FY), Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA), Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA), Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden (RA), Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy (AC), School of Biochemistry and Immunology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland (CC), First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medical University of Lublin, Poland (WD), Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (KI), Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (HK), Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Acute Intoxications, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland (KK), Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia (NG, NL, SP, SR), Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy (NL, SP), Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (AMJM), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nykoebing Hospital; University of Southern Denmark, SDU (SK, FR), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia (ARB), Center for Intensive Care Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland (ARB), Department of Health Science, Section of Anesthesiology, University of Florence (SR), Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy (SR), School of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Science, Winterthur, Switzerland (MS), Departments of Psychiatry and Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (AJCS), Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium (AJCS) and Dental Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Polo Universitario Ospedale San Paolo, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Odontoiatric Sciences, University of Milano, Milan, Italy (CT)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Preoperative Risk Factors Associated with Increased Incidence of Postoperative Delirium: Systematic Review of Qualified Clinical Studies. Geriatrics (Basel) 2023; 8:geriatrics8010024. [PMID: 36826366 PMCID: PMC9956273 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics8010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative delirium (POD) is an acute alteration of mental state, characterized by reduced awareness and attention, occurring up to five postoperative days after recovery from anesthesia. Several original studies and reviews have identified possible perioperative POD risk factors; however, there is no comprehensive review of the preoperative risk factors in patients diagnosed with POD using only validated diagnostic scales. The aim of this systematic review was to report the preoperative risk factors associated with an increased incidence of POD in patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-brain surgery. The reviewed studies included original research papers that used at least one validated diagnostic scale to identify POD occurrence for more than 24 h. A total of 6475 references were retrieved from the database search, with only 260 of them being suitable for further review. Out of the 260 reviewed studies, only 165 that used a validated POD scale reported one or more preoperative risk factors. Forty-one risk factors were identified, with various levels of statistical significance. The extracted risk factors could serve as a preoperative POD risk assessment workup. Future studies dedicated to the further evaluation of the specific preoperative risk factors' contributions to POD could help with the development of a weighted screening tool.
Collapse
|
5
|
Burry LD, Cheng W, Williamson DR, Adhikari NK, Egerod I, Kanji S, Martin CM, Hutton B, Rose L. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:943-960. [PMID: 34379152 PMCID: PMC8356549 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06490-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the effects of prevention interventions on delirium occurrence in critically ill adults. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Prospero, and WHO international clinical trial registry were searched from inception to April 8, 2021. Randomized controlled trials of pharmacological, sedation, non-pharmacological, and multi-component interventions enrolling adult critically ill patients were included. We performed conventional pairwise meta-analyses, NMA within Bayesian random effects modeling, and determined surface under the cumulative ranking curve values and mean rank. Reviewer pairs independently extracted data, assessed bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and evidence certainty with GRADE. The primary outcome was delirium occurrence; secondary outcomes were durations of delirium and mechanical ventilation, length of stay, mortality, and adverse effects. RESULTS Eighty trials met eligibility criteria: 67.5% pharmacological, 31.3% non-pharmacological and 1.2% mixed pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. For delirium occurrence, 11 pharmacological interventions (38 trials, N = 11,993) connected to the evidence network. Compared to placebo, only dexmedetomidine (21/22 alpha2 agonist trials were dexmedetomidine) probably reduces delirium occurrence (odds ratio (OR) 0.43, 95% Credible Interval (CrI) 0.21-0.85; moderate certainty). Compared to benzodiazepines, dexmedetomidine (OR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.08-0.51; low certainty), sedation interruption (OR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.06-0.69; very low certainty), opioid plus benzodiazepine (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.10-0.76; very low certainty), and protocolized sedation (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.09-0.80; very low certainty) may reduce delirium occurrence but the evidence is very uncertain. Dexmedetomidine probably reduces ICU length of stay compared to placebo (Ratio of Means (RoM) 0.78, CrI 0.64-0.95; moderate certainty) and compared to antipsychotics (RoM 0.76, CrI 0.61-0.98; low certainty). Sedative interruption, protocolized sedation and opioids may reduce hospital length of stay compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain. No intervention influenced mechanical ventilation duration, mortality, or arrhythmia. Single and multi-component non-pharmacological interventions did not connect to any evidence networks to allow for ranking and comparisons as planned; pairwise comparisons did not detect differences compared to standard care. CONCLUSION Compared to placebo and benzodiazepines, we found dexmedetomidine likely reduced the occurrence of delirium in critically ill adults. Compared to benzodiazepines, sedation-minimization strategies may also reduce delirium occurrence, but the evidence is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa D. Burry
- Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 18-377, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
- Department Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA
| | - David R. Williamson
- Pharmacy Department, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Pharmacy Department and Research Centre, CIUSSS-NIM Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Neill K. Adhikari
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ingrid Egerod
- Intensive Care Unit 4131, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Salmaan Kanji
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Claudio M. Martin
- Division of Critical Care, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
- Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee JM, Cho YJ, Ahn EJ, Choi GJ, Kang H. Pharmacological strategies to prevent postoperative delirium: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2021; 16:28-48. [PMID: 33445233 PMCID: PMC7861905 DOI: 10.17085/apm.20079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a condition of cerebral dysfunction and a common complication after surgery. This study aimed to compare and determine the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for preventing POD using a network meta-analysis. Methods We performed a systematic and comprehensive search to identify and analyze all randomized controlled trials until June 29, 2020, comparing two or more pharmacological interventions, including placebo, to prevent or reduce POD. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. We performed a network meta-analysis and used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and rankograms to present the hierarchy of the pharmacological interventions evaluated. Results According to the SUCRA value, the incidence of POD decreased in the following order: the combination of propofol and acetaminophen (86.1%), combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine (86.0%), combination of diazepam, flunitrazepam, and pethidine (84.8%), and olanzapine (75.6%) after all types of anesthesia; combination of propofol and acetaminophen (85.9%), combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine (83.2%), gabapentin (82.2%), and combination of diazepam, flunitrazepam, and pethidine (79.7%) after general anesthesia; and ketamine (87.1%), combination of propofol and acetaminophen (86.0%), and combination of dexmedetomidine and acetaminophen (66.3%) after cardiac surgery. However, only the dexmedetomidine group showed a lower incidence of POD than the control group after all types of anesthesia and after general anesthesia. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine reduced POD compared with the control group. The combination of propofol and acetaminophen and the combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine seemed to be effective in preventing POD. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal pharmacological intervention to prevent POD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Mo Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye Jin Cho
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jin Ahn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geun Joo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,The Institute of Evidence Based Clinical Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,The Institute of Evidence Based Clinical Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hughes CG, Boncyk CS, Culley DJ, Fleisher LA, Leung JM, McDonagh DL, Gan TJ, McEvoy MD, Miller TE. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Postoperative Delirium Prevention. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:1572-1590. [PMID: 32022748 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative delirium is a geriatric syndrome that manifests as changes in cognition, attention, and levels of consciousness after surgery. It occurs in up to 50% of patients after major surgery and is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased hospital length of stay, higher cost of care, higher rates of institutionalization after discharge, and higher rates of readmission. Furthermore, it is associated with functional decline and cognitive impairments after surgery. As the age and medical complexity of our surgical population increases, practitioners need the skills to identify and prevent delirium in this high-risk population. Because delirium is a common and consequential postoperative complication, there has been an abundance of recent research focused on delirium, conducted by clinicians from a variety of specialties. There have also been several reviews and recommendation statements; however, these have not been based on robust evidence. The Sixth Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI-6) consensus conference brought together a team of multidisciplinary experts to formally survey and evaluate the literature on postoperative delirium prevention and provide evidence-based recommendations using an iterative Delphi process and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Criteria for evaluating biomedical literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Hughes
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center and the Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Christina S Boncyk
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center and the Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Deborah J Culley
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Penn Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacqueline M Leung
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David L McDonagh
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Neurological Surgery, and Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Matthew D McEvoy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lim R, Arshad W. Underlying Serotonin Syndrome, Masked by Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Myocardial Ischemia. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2020; 21:e924109. [PMID: 32503963 PMCID: PMC7304653 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.924109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serotonin syndrome is a life-threatening condition that involves overstimulation serotonin receptors, which can be caused by medication overdose, drug-drug interactions, and regular doses of medications. It is often an overlooked diagnosis due to the presenting symptoms. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 79-year-old man with a past medical history significant for coronary artery disease status after coronary bypass surgery who presented to the Emergency Department with altered mental status. Vital signs were significant for hyperthermia. On initial assessment, he was only oriented to person and demonstrated shaking rigors. Lab test results were significant for leukocytosis, with troponins 2.94. A chest X-ray revealed left lower-lobe opacification. He was initially treated for community-acquired pneumonia and his elevated troponin required further work up. He was moved to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to worsening respiratory distress, shaking tremors, and confusion. His troponins remained elevated. On his third day of hospitalization, his rigors had improved, but clonus was present. A medication review revealed the patient was on sertraline. He was started on cyproheptadine. The next morning, his mental status had improved to alert and oriented, and his condition returned to baseline. Upon discharge to a rehab facility, sertraline was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS Serotonin syndrome is a condition that is often not initially recognized. Our patient had multiple health problems and presented with altered mental status and tremors, and serotonin syndrome was not recognized until a full neurological exam and medication review had been done. It is important for physicians to be aware of serotonin syndrome as a differential diagnosis, as the symptoms can be masked by other presenting symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Royale Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Magnolia Regional Health Center, Corinth, MS, USA
| | - Waqaar Arshad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Magnolia Regional Health Center, Corinth, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pharmacological Prevention of Postoperative Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2019; 2019:9607129. [PMID: 31001357 PMCID: PMC6437723 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9607129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background The high prevalence of delirium among postoperative patients has increased morbidity and mortality. The kind of drug that can effectively reduce the incidence of delirium has become the focus of discussion in recent years. However, a consensus in this respect has yet to be reached. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase databases from their inception through October 12, 2018. We included RCTs of pharmacological prevention for postoperative delirium in adults (at least 18 years), and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of trials. The primary outcomes were the risk ratios (RRs) of incidence of postoperative delirium, and the secondary outcomes were the RRs of mortality and adverse events in the intervention and control groups. Results Thirty-eight trials, which comprised 20302 patients and 18 different drugs, were included in the analysis. Of the 38 studies, 17 were rated as low risk with respect to methodological quality. Dexmedetomidine administration (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.44-0.76, P<0.01) was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative delirium than the control conditions. However, the findings from the studies with a low risk of bias did not show a significant difference in this beneficial effect (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.39-1.04, P=0.07). The antipsychotic drugs olanzapine (RR 0.44, 95%CI 0.30- 0.65, P<0.01) and risperidone (RR 0.42, 95%CI 0.19-0.92, P=0.03) had promising effects, but there was a lack of sufficient evidence to obtain a definitive conclusion. The beneficial effect of other drugs, including haloperidol, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, gabapentin, ketamine, cyproheptadine, donepezil, hypertonic saline, melatonin, nimodipine, ondansetron, pregabalin, rivastigmine, TJ-54, and tryptophan, was not proven on the basis of present evidence. Conclusion Among the pharmacological prophylactic measures for postoperative delirium, dexmedetomidine, olanzapine, and risperidone showed higher efficacy than other drugs. However, more high-quality evidence is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
10
|
Shimizu K, Iwase A, Sakurai Y, Nakamura T, Osuka S, Takikawa S, Goto M, Kikkawa F. Retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating intraligamentous leiomyomas from subserosal leiomyomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 215:256-257. [PMID: 28689575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Shimizu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Akira Iwase
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan; Department of Maternal and Perinatal Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Sakurai
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Tomoko Nakamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Satoko Osuka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan; Department of Maternal and Perinatal Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Sachiko Takikawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Maki Goto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Fumitaka Kikkawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|